Terrible Quality issue with MPEG 2 (DVD- encode plz HELP!!!
Hello,
I edited something short in FCP 5 and wanted to make a DVD but the resulted mpeg-2 file has grabage all over. Not just square artefacts but a lot of problems like an old VHS maybe (but it isn't video noise either). It's more like a DV tape that would be ******.
I tried to recompress in DV and the resulting quicktime .mov file is fine. But every time I encode it in any of the DVD presets it is terrible. Also tried MPEG-1. Same.
As for the 2 pass encodes they crash my computer...
Please help Obi-Wan Compressor you are my only hope.
If you're running some flavor of Compressor 2, then try using the One Pass setting (but not the One-Pass VBR setting) at 6.5 Mbps. If you're still having issues, other things to try:
up the One Pass bit rate to 7.5 Mbps
Alter GOP to Open (from the default Closed)
Alter GOP structure to IP (from the default IBBP)
If I'm having issues with Compressor 2's Two Pass encodes, I can usually save my hide with a One Pass 7.5 Mbps Open IBBP GOP encode. If that doesn't work, Plan B is to do a One Pass 6.5 Mbps Closed IP GOP encode.
Or are you using Compressor 1?
Similar Messages
-
Hi Guys
I am having some real issues with Adobe Media Encoder (AME) at the moment. It appears that I am unable to encode an h.264 for Vimeo from a Premiere Pro Project file at the moment without at least some weird image issues that are not supposed to be there. These include weird flickering, colour changes, artefacts etc. This is if I am lucky...often I am unable to get the process to complete as the application either crashes and tells me there has been a problem or it simply freezes and I have to force quit the application and often restart my machine.
The problem seems to not to just be with h.264 for the web encodes but also with BluRay h.264 as well. As yet I haven't seen if there is a problem with MPEG-2 for DVD so I will check this out too!
Does anyone else see this happening or does anyone know what might be the problem?
I thought the Premiere Pro project might have been corrupt so tried a different project but the same issues were happening here too.
Any help would be really gratefully received.
Cheers
EDIT - I have just found this online which is exactly the problem I am having! Thanks a bloody bunch Apple! 10.9.3 causing headaches for Mac Pro users | MacIssues
Message was edited by: Alex CameronAgreed, I now have a project to GET OUT, and AME crashes consistently 1/3 into the render. It appears to halt all processing after (real time) 00:02:30
Am seriously considering uninstalling CC as I am beginning to find other issues in some apps, and going back to CS6/MC just so I can get work out. Durn it Adobe this is AWFUL!!
Alright, let's try to be constructive instead of throwing rocks... but the frustration level is high, and I have material on deadline. Let's get with this, guys...
What OS Win7, 64-bit
What version of AME/PPro (Please be specific by getting the full version number in the About Adobe Media Encoder screen) 8.2.0.54 Ppro: 8.2.0 (65)
When is it crashing (Again, the more detail here about where it was in the encoding process the better) roughly 1/3 into the sequence, always on exactly the same frame - tried replacing the clip with something different to see if it was a timeline error, and NO EFFECT.
What is your source (PPro project or media file (what kind?)) PPro
If the source if a PPro project, does it work when exporting directly from PPro? NO
What format are you exporting to? H.264, QT, WM, tried everything my client can play.
Do other formats work? MPEG2, QuickTime, etc? NO
Have you tried with GPU rendering on? How about turning it off by switching to Software-only mode? Mine doesn't have any choice, it's software-only.
Have you tried disabling Native Sequence Loading? (AME Preferences: General > Enable Native Sequence Loading) No effect
Other things I tried: uninstalling/reinstalling AME, setting cache to a fast local disk. -
Quality issues with IDVD solved
Hi All
RE. Best looking IDVD playback.
May this help all those stuggling with quality issues with perfect looking Qtime files encoded by IDVD coming out looking crap.
Simply this: instead of exporting your media from your FCP timeline in H.264 - instead select Motion JPEG A. This is found under your setting options in your Qtime movie/settings export window.
Your files will export much, much faster than Apple's default setting of H.264, you will also get very smooth playback wihtout any jaggies or nasty artifacts. Files are a larger but, hey, it just looks great.
Let me know if this works for you - it took me ages to figure this out!
Best regards
PostGuy40
Imac 2.16Ghz intel dual core Mac OS X (10.4.8) 17"Good info. I'll keep this in mind next time.
-
on windows 8 and itunes I have importing problems the DVD is only reading the music cd from 1.5x to 4.0x for 95% of the time, it does hit speeds of 30x for the other 5% of the time. Is it a driver issue with the DVD or is it a windows 8 issue?
No. You have no alternative but to plug it into a computer running iTunes and restore it.
-
Photo Quality Issues with Pixma MG6220
I am frustrated. The first photo printed from this printer was of poor quality. It was very 'grainy' and 'noisey'. I printed from the printer itself (put camera card into printer). I then printed from Picasa, same problem, very poor quality. It was then a couple of months before I attempted printing again. I printed from PS Elements 11. The quality was much improved but not what I expected from this printer. I finally called tech support, after tweaking every setting I could find. They essentially blamed my computer, wanted to reinstall the drivers and I need to buy new ink cartridges. It's NOT my computer. I'm curious as to why they think it's the drivers. It very well could be bad cartridges. The printer was purchased in December (six months ago). I'm wondering why the photo software would make a difference. I'm irritated that the people I spoke with seemed completely incurious as to what, exactlly, was wrong with the photos. It would appear that no on else has had this issue. The reviews for this printer were very good. I can't imagine reviewing these images and stating that they are "excellent" as I have read from many reviews. I'll be more than happy to attach scanned images for review (scanner works fine). Thank you.
Hi,
Check this for scanned images and originals for reference:
http://flickr.com/gp/skital/Y9615F
(you can download full-res versions there as well - it's a bit hidden if you don't know flickr)
This was using Canon Glossy II photo paper and NOT Canon Ink. I was trying different replacement inks over the time and I had similar results.
I'm a little bit hesitant with spending more money on this printer, esp. that I had never have this kind of quality issues with my previous Canon printer (MP600) when using non canon inks - I had color issues but never grainess.
Well, I may try original inks again, but it breaks a deal for this printer. -
TS2681 quality issues with I pad 3, now on my 4th in 3 weeks
Quality issues with the new Ipad 3 , now on my 4th in 3 weeks , each time marks / scraches in the metal case are evident, not what i expect from apple , unable to e mail direct,
One of two things is happening.
1) You have had an unusual run of bad luck. So, return it and try again.
2) With all respect, you may be so picky, you'll never be satisfied.
Matt -
Recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p
Good afternoon to all forumers,
I am trying to find out if anyone besides me have the same recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p? Although these issues have all been resolved by HP. I find it very inconvenient since this is a business notebook and these issues have cause me a lot of down time and grievances. A list of my Elite book issues.
Warped LCD panel causing the latch not to work. (1 time)
Dead pixels on new LCD panel replacement (1 time).
Deteriorated touch pad rubber left button, which I don't use. (1 time)
Keyboard not working. (2 times)
Screw holding the top sdie switch panel came off on one corner. Reason being, the screw holder cracked (1 time).
Reading lack cover on the LCD panel cracked on its own. I rarely use this. (1 time).
Notebook overheating. The cooling element not working properly. (1 time).
Defective power adapter, loose contact at adapter (1 time). Replaced within warranty period.
I do not know whether to term this as` unlucky' or to say that today's HP business notebook has not got the `Quality' a business notebook should have. I have used other business notebook from HP, namely 2 models from the nx series but they are not as bad as the Elitebook except for the same high operating temperature issue.
Is there any course of action that I can take up with HP Malaysia? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
-Keith CK LooHi, Keith:
I have a 6930p and was leery about getting one, after reading this link below from the business support forum, but I only paid $499 for it brand new. I couldn't pass up a deal like that.
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebook-HP-ProBook-Compaq-Slate/6930p-Quality-Issues/m-p/1066713#M1505...
I heard that many of the issues you and the others that posted were improved/fixed by HP later on in production. My notebook was built in December of 2010, so it was pretty much the last of the line.
I have not experienced any problems with mine thus far, after 8 months of light use. I have tested every component at least once. I know the latch issue was fixed on later models.
Paul -
Quality issues with slideshows
Hi,
I'm a long term user of PE v9 (basic editing & burning of home vids & slideshows), but I've just bought a new computer & upgraded to Photoshop & PE v11.
The first slideshow I created (created in Photoshop & exported to PE for adding music, titles etc) had a lot of issues:
Some of the photos were rotated 90 degrees & stretched (which I noticed & cut out prior to burning), but more importantly,
The end product once burned to DVD is of terrible quality.
I seem to recall that when I first set up PE 9 I set a project quality standard that all future projects would follow unless I changed it. I've looked everywhere in PE 11 & I can't find where this is set. I'm not overly technical and I'm out of ideas re: where to look to fix these quality issues.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Cozzie.Hi Apple Miga,
I've spent literally hours on this trying all sorts of combinations of settings and ways & means of initiating a slideshow. To my surprise & absolute elation, I finally had a partial win late last night. I finally got the quality of the slides to be as good as I've been getting for years with PrE v7. I haven't been able to work out the rotation & stretching of some photos yet, but I'm at least I've got good quality on the photos that didn't rotate (which is the bulk of them).
Here's what I did, triggered by a comment above by VDOSurfer (thankyou VDOSurfer). I had actually already tried setting the project settings to DV-PAL (instead of AVCHD-PAL which I'd been using successfully with PrE v7) a couple of times with the same poor results, but I tried it again in a different order as follows:
Open PrE11.
Select 'New Project' (ie not existing project)
Once the new project opens up, select File, New Project (from the file menu at the top of the screen)
Click on 'Change Settings' at the bottom of the dialog box. I noticed here that my settings were always defaulting to NTSC/AVCHD 1080p60. So I changed this to PAL/DV Widescreen 48kHz (I live in Australia, so if you're in the US, I guess you'd select NTSC/DV Widescreen 48kHz).
Click on the checkbox 'Force selected project settings on this project'.
Click on Add Media
I added my slideshow from Photoshop because I'd already prepared it in that product, but you should be able to add it from wherever your photos live.
Click on Publish+Share, select DVD & Disk, ensure PAL_DOLBY_Widescreen DVD is selected. (If you're in the US, this would be NTSC).
Burn as normal.
This worked very well for me. Hope it helps. Please let me know how you go.
If anyone has any thoughts on how to stop the random rotation & stretching, I'd love to hear. Note that photos that are rotated & stretched start off in the correct rotation in Photoshop Elements v11 prior to exporting to PrE 11.
Thanks,
Cozzie. -
Quality Issues with Drop Zones - Newbie ALERT!
Hello!
First post for me here...
Just started working with Final Cut Studio 5.1 and I have some issues that I have been running into. In DVD Studio, I am grabbing a menu template (Panes Blue) and I am creating a simple text animation in Motion (720x480) NTSC and saving the Motion file then importing the Motion file into DVD studio and setting up the drop zone asset to my motion file. When I preview, the text quality is very poor! At first I thought it was just the preview, but it still looks horrible on the TV when I burn.
How do I get the best quality when creating an animation in Motion that I would like to use in a DVD studio Drop Zone?
Please let me know if you need further info!
Jasonhere's the issue:
DVDSP doesn't encode progressive scan. it doesn't matter what your encode settings are. I've done extensive testing on this issue. here's what happens:
I made an element that fits perfectly into a specified drop zone. the menu Background image or movie is rendered progressive scan (not interlaced). I drop the element into the drop zone and hit Simulate. Since the Drop zone and it's element need to be encoded to Mpeg2 in order to play properly, DVDSP interlaces it to make it work. Result: bad image compression and the drop zone area is badly interlaced while the rest of the image isn't.
This was something that frustrated me for weeks while i was trying to find a solution. As far as I know there is only one solution; Since DVDSP uses Compressor to encode files on build, there must be a way of intercepting the process and changing the settings that DVDSP uses to encode it's files. There is no preference for this and since the encoding takes place in the background, there is no way of changing this without getting a programmer to figure out how to do it, and even then, i don't know if it's possible. If someone can figure out how do do this, there'll be a lot of Happy people wanting it. -
Quality issues with VGA port on Type 2504 docking station
Hi,
I see quality issues on the VGA output of the Type 2504 docking station with a T61. The monitor image is blurred, not much, but enough to be irritating. When I compare the DVI output with the VGA output on two equal NEC MultiSync LCD 2170NX monitors it is a clear difference. If I connect the LCD monitor to the VGA output of the T61 itself, the picture is clean. I have tried both monitors with different cables in different configurations and also adjusted monitors manually, and my conclusion is that it must be the VGA output of the 2504 that generates the un-sharpness. I have got several 2504 docking stations from the IT department to test and all attempts show the same unsharp picture on the LCD connected to the VGA port of any 2504. Recently a colleague got a new laptop and docking station. He also used DVI and VGA on the old setup and had no visible difference between the two monitors. His new setup is a different T but his new dock is also a 2504. Now he has clear difference between his monitors. He also tried several 2540 docks and cables but the difference is still present.
The unsharpness is not immediately present when just looking at a dual head setup. But after a while it becomes tiresome to look at text, specially black on white, on the monitor connected to the VGA port. There is a slight shadow on the right side of all letters. When looking at non-aliased fonts, they look as if aliased on the VGA connected monitor. Already aliased fonts tend to "smear" and I have the unpleasant feeling that my eyes are not focusing correctly.
My question is: Is there a different VGA DAC on the docking station, or are the analog signals just wired through from the laptop VGA DAC? Older IBM docks do not have this problem, we have a lot of them at work in dual head configuration with DVI + VGA to compare, and we only see this problem with the 2504.VGA is an analogue signal... so it can be affected by the quality of DAC chip used by the GPU associated electronics, the quality of connectors on the vga out and dock (that is why good analgoue audio equipment use gold plated stuffs) and the quality of copper wire and shiedling used in the cable (i.e. Low Oxygen Content Copper wire).
The above is general description for all people to use <---- so please don't feel offended if i repeat something that is already said.
There is NO conversion electronics on the dock per se, they are just passthrough, so no conversion.
I guess the problem lies with improper shielding somewhere. I have the same problem with my T61/60 and dock and my T40,41,42,43 on five different docks.
So i have ended up using lenovo usb2dvi converter on T61 and have two dvi output and bypassed the vga altogether.
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft -
Quality issues with calls from US to Korea
I've always been a big fan of Skype. I have a premium account and I use "Skype to go" to call from the US to South Korea. Starting about 5 months ago, the quality of these calls has severely degraded. It is almost not worth the call. It is very difficult for me to hear the people I've called and for them to hear me as well. There is no Skype customer support contact phone number listed anywhere on the Skype website that I can find. Otherwise, I'd be addressing this issue with a real person. Is there a reason for this call quality degradation? Is there a fix in work? Is there a customer service number I can call? Is it time for me to leave Skype?
rates are available on http://www.skype.com/en/rates/ just enter Itay in the destination and check the rates lower down the page.
If you are going to make a lot of calls - check the subscriptions available too...
There are subscriptions that include landlines and mobiles as well -
Quality issues with inserted video file
Hello,
can anyone help me with a video problem in Captivate 6.1, please!
I’m currently working on a Captivate project where I need to include a movie file.
I have the same movie in two different formats .mov and .wmv, which are both looking just great when I watch them with any player on my Windows7 system or on the Mac of my colleagues.
When inserting the movie the encoding to .flv takes place by the Media Encoder, which also seems to be working just fine.
But when playing the project in Captivate, the inserted video shows such a bad quality, that I’m not able to use it like this.
I already have tried different things (inserted as event video or multi-slide synchronized video; changed the slide quality to high; encoded the movies to .f4v files with the Media Encoder; installed a new windows codec package) but nothing leads to an acceptable result.
Which settings do I need to change in Captivate/in the Media Encoder to receive a good video quality?
What else could I do to improve the quality of movies for Captivate projects?
Is there any minimum requirements for movies concerning file format, encoding, or anything else?
Thank you so much in advance for your help,
SabineHello Varun,
thank you very much for your reply.
I tried unchecking the compression options, doesn’t help
I haven’t yet published the project, the problems occur already when playing the project in Captivate.
The project resolution is 1280x720.
The resolution of the .mov-file of the video is 1920x1080 (12000Kbps, if this information is any helpful…)
The resolution of the .wmv-file of the video is 1280x720 (3000Kbps…)
Maybe the problem occurs already during encoding, the .flv that is created by the Media Encoder doesn’t look that good anymore, I just played it separately (not in a Captivate project).
Are there any settings I could check for the Media Encoder?
Thanks,
Sabine -
Image Quality issue with script
So I recently wrote a simple script to output an image at a bunch of different resolutions. However, I am running into an image quality issue that I don't run into when I do the same thing manually.
Here is an example image showcasing the image: http://terminalvelocity.ca/temp/notworking.jpg
As you can see along the top of the model's forhead there is destinct color fragmentation. Which seems very strange.
Here is the script, it is pretty simple, it asks for a few simple config options. (the above image was created using default settings). It then figures out the correct ratios and loops through doing each resize, saving the image, then reverting the history so each iteration uses the original image data and not the resized version:
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
primary = doc.width;
secondary = doc.height;
}else{
primary = doc.height;
secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
var p = i
var s = i * ratio;
size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
if(doc.width > doc.height){
w = n = size[i][0];
h = size[i][1];
}else{
w = size[i][1];
n= h = size[i][0];
if(doc.width >= w && doc.height >= h){
doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);
doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
In comparison, here is an example of an image of the exact same resolution that does not exhibit this issue at all:
The steps taken to save this image were as follows: http://photography.terminalvelocity.ca/content/images/2012/avery_konrad_6/horizontal/1500. jpg
Image > Resize > Bicubic Sharper (1500px);
Save For Web
Jpeg
Quality 75
Optimzed: true
Progressive: false
Blur: 0
Convert to sRGB: true
Anyway, as you can see, The manually exported image does not have any of the quality issues that are present within the scripted image. I am pretty new to photoshop scriping so am assuming it has something to do with me missing some sort of option in the save settings. Any help would be swell.
Also note, this doesn't occur on all images, I usually don't see an issue when using the script, however, something about the tones of this particular photo make it really obvious.
I am using the latest version of Photoshop CS6 (creative cloud) on Max OSX
thanks so much!I'm on windows find the bicubicsharper does not work well it the image being resized has been highly sharpened all ready. Because of my Photoshop preferences I had to make minor modification to your script. I'm also a bit colorblind so i don't see many color issues so I include a screen capture if what windows does with your image and script.
var orig_ruler_units = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS; // Set the ruler units to PIXELS
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
primary = doc.width;
secondary = doc.height;
}else{
primary = doc.height;
secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
var p = i
var s = i * ratio;
size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
if(doc.width > doc.height){
w = n = size[i][0];
h = size[i][1];
}else{
w = size[i][1];
n= h = size[i][0];
if(doc.width.value >= w && doc.height.value >= h){
doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);
doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
app.preferences.rulerUnits = orig_ruler_units; // Reset units to original settings -
Issue with Weblogic character encoding
I have struts2 based web application which works fine with tomcat server but when i deployed the application to weblogic 10.3 server it is creating following issue-
1) when i enter data in application forms with £ (pound sign), £ gets converted to ?
My Jsp Page is using ISO-8859-1 charset. please look at the snapshot from jsp page.
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" />
I have debug the application and came to know that this data (£ sign) is converted to ? before being assigned to corresponding property in action class.
this seems to be issue with encoding of characters with weblogic server.
I have also tried to fix this issue by defining the charset in weblogic.xml file in my application as follows but it does'nt solve this issue. please see the snapshot from weblogic.xml file.
<wls:weblogic-version>10.3</wls:weblogic-version>
<wls:context-root>APMApplication</wls:context-root>
<wls:charset-params>
<wls:input-charset>
<wls:resource-path>/*</wls:resource-path>
<wls:java-charset-name>ISO-8859-1</wls:java-charset-name>
</wls:input-charset>
</wls:charset-params>
Please suggest some solution to fix this issue. thanking you in advance."I can not change the charset in jsp pages i.e i have to use ISO-8859-1 in my jsp page which is a must have requirment."
You are right here as the pound sign is not included in UTF-8 (did not know that sorry).
Could you try setting the page directive of the JSP to
<%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" language="java" %>or when you are working with jspx
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="2.0">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"/>
</jsp:root> -
Has Apple addressed poor sound quality issues with new 160GB iPod classic?
I just bought a new 160GB iPod classic, replacing a perfectly good 80GB iPod Video (5.5), thinking that the newer one would be superior to my 3 year old model. I discovered that the sound of the new unit was flat and muddy compared to the older model. I found that the 5th gen iPod video was more "spacial", if that's an appropriate word to use; the bass was more present and more clearly defined, as was the rest of the sonic spectrum. I searched several forums to research this issue and while there were numerous references to this issue, all of the posts I found referred to the original iPod classics (80GB and 160GB) and not the later 120GB classics nor the new 160GB classics like the one I bought. Has Apple done anything to address this issue since the first classics were released or are the new ones still suffering from the same sound quality issues as the original classics?
Based on your observations here, they apparently have not changed the sound quality since the original 160GB classic. I noticed a clear narrowing of the sound stage (ambiance) between the 5.5G 80Gb and my 6G 160GB. You're describing the same characteristic. I don't own the newest 160GB version and came here today to see if it might have improved the sound quality back to the 5.5 spaciousness. Note that the 5.5G has a higher signal to noise ratio than the 6G, making it difficult for me to enjoy it through efficient balanced armature in ear monitors like the Shure SE530s or Ulimate Ears Triple.Fi 10s.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Itunes 7.02 not working with 4gb nano
I have a 2ND generration Nano that Itunes 7.0.2.16 refuses to see. I have the issue on multiple computers, including a brand new unit I installed Itunes on only for testing this When connecting, Itunes will auto start as if it recognized the Nano was
-
Flat File to Flat File scenario
Hi all, I have a flat file to flat file scenario. I pick up a file in a specific format and produce a flat file in tab delimited format after some mapping. Everything is ok. All the functionality is working perfectly. However, there is one small erro
-
SAP Version: SAP B1 8.8 PL 10 Hi All, On 1st of every month we close the Previous moth Posting Period, so that No user can Add or Update any Documents which belongs to the previous month. But we had to give authorization to few managers
-
My ipad is connected to the wifi. But I can't access anything since it shows SERVER STOPPED RESPONDING! Please help me to solve this thing!
-
HT203200 Error (-50 when sync from iTunes
Error (-50 when sync from iTunes ???