Test-ReplicationHealth Database Redundandacy and Database Avaliability *FAILED* Exchange 2013 DAG setup
Trying to setup DAG between 2 exchange 2013 servers - one of them being in the remote location with physical point to point line. We have no firewall rules between 2 locations
EX01 ( on site)
EX02 (remote)
ETH01 10.11.1.2/24 - MAPI ETH01 10.11.13.15/24
ETH02 10.0.0.1/30 - REPLICATIOn ETH02 10.0.0.2/30 - REPLICATION
Witness server is in 3rd remote location
These are the test results I get from Test-ReplicationHealth and Cluster Network Validation
I also run a Nmap command to make sure udp port 3343 is open on both sides
alex serdyukov
Hi,
The error message said that current Redundancy Count was 1 but expected Redundancy Count was 2. Therefore, Database 'IT2013' does not have enough copies configured to meet the validation criteria.
Please replicate that database to another server at least. We can refer to Hinte's suggestion to
add another copy for the database 'IT2013' in the DAG then check whether the issue persists.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support
Similar Messages
-
Updates fail to install because Microsoft Database Daemon and SyncServices Host fail to close. Any help?
Ask on the Microsoft Mac forums since it's their product you're having trouble with. these forums only provide support for Apple products
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac -
Difference Between Database Schema and Database User Account ??
First i would like to know what an Oracle Database schema exactly is ?
And what is it for and also What is it's use ?
Later the exact "Difference Between Database Schema and Database User Account".
I googled about it but i'm unable to find out it's The difference,
Please try to explain in a simple manner........
Thank you very Much in Advance..........user13655582 wrote:
Greate example. but i would like add one more point..
a user is a schema and schema is a user. but when this applies to the user that he become a schema, only if he has got some objects. so we can say while creating the user which dosent contain any objects called simple user account but afterwords when he has got an objects then we can say its a schema as the above user has shown you through the exampleIt is just word-play. There is nothing in like a 'status' indicator to say "USER_A is just a user but USER_B has become a schema". Many people use the terms "user" and "schema" interchangeably, and some very good DBAs will insist this is correct. I don't disagree with them even though I usually try to make the distinction.
In a typical application, all of the objects (tables, procedures, etc) that implement the app will be owned by a "application schema owner" - a user which exists for the sole purpose of owning the schema. Said user will have no privileges at all .. especially not CREATE SESSION. Except for possible maintenance activity no one ever actually connects as this user. User accounts are then given to actual humans who connect with their own accounts. The accounts have the necessary system and object privileges granted to them - via a role. One could also create a special account (let's call it APP_ADMIN) that is used for maintenance and batch operations within the application. -
What is the exact difference between Database Cloning and Database Refresh?
Hi,
Can anybody tel me the exact difference between Database Cloning and Database Refresh?
I Have some conflicts in these topics.
Thanks
RajeshRefresh is what it says, "refresh" . You have a main site which would always have the data being inserted into it. There would be another site which would remain some where else . This site needs to be refreshed with the primary site. So you need to do export from the primary, push it to the secondary site and done!
HTH
Aman.... -
What is Database Commit and Database Rollback.
What is Database Commit and Database Rollback.
Hi Sir ,
Please have a look below .Hope it is suitable and simpler solution for your question.
Please do reward if useful.
Thankx.
In database level this will be used..
Commit is nothing but SAVE the current record..
If u rol back before commit means whatever u proceeded for the SAVING will be roll back and the data will not be stored..
This will be used,When some times u r filling a register form..after filling 20 fields,In the 21st field u will not to registrer means it will be rollbacked using the Rollbeck command.
In detail--->
ROLLBACK->
In a ROLLBACK, all the changes made by a transaction or a subtransaction on the database instance are reversed.
· Changes closed with a COMMIT can no longer be reversed with a ROLLBACK.
· As a result of a ROLLBACK, a new transaction is implicitly opened.
In normal database operation, the database system performs the required ROLLBACK actions independently. However, ROLLBACK can also be explicitly requested using appropriate SQL statements.
In a restart, the system checks which transactions were canceled or closed with a ROLLBACK. The actions are these transactions are undone.
COMMIT->
In a COMMIT, all the changes made by a transaction or a subtransaction on the database instance are recorded.
· Changes closed with a COMMIT can no longer be reversed with a ROLLBACK.
· As a result of a COMMIT, a new transaction is implicitly opened.
In normal database operation, the database system performs the required COMMIT actions independently. However, COMMIT can also be explicitly requested using appropriate SQL statements.
In a restart, the system checks which transactions were closed with a COMMIT. These actions are redone. Transactions not yet closed with a COMMIT are undone.
From the point of view of database programming, a database LUW is an inseparable sequence of database operations that ends with a database commit. The database LUW is either fully executed by the database system or not at all. Once a database LUW has been successfully executed, the database will be in a consistent state. If an error occurs within a database LUW, all of the database changes since the beginning of the database LUW are reversed. This leaves the database in the state it was in before the transaction started.
the statements
COMMIT WORK.
and
ROLLBACK WORK.
for confirming or undoing database updates. COMMIT WORK always concludes a database LUW and starts a new one. ROLLBACK WORK always undoes all changes back to the start of the database LUW. -
Exchange 2013 SP1 setup fails at prerequisite Analysis
I installed a completely new server network with Hyper-v 2012R2
I installed two virtual 2012R2 servers: DC01 as the Domain Controller of "testdomain.local" and EX01 as the Exchange server.
EX01 is joined the domain "testdomain" from DC01
I log in on EX01 with an in AD created testdomain\exadmin account who is member of domain admins, enterprise admins, schema admins, administrators and group policy creator owners.
I have run the command Install-WindowsFeature AS-HTTP-Activation, Desktop-Experience,
NET-Framework-45-Features, RPC-over-HTTP-proxy, RSAT-Clustering, RSAT-Clustering-CmdInterface, RSAT-Clustering-Mgmt, RSAT-Clustering-PowerShell, Web-Mgmt-Console, WAS-Process-Model, Web-Asp-Net45, Web-Basic-Auth, Web-Client-Auth, Web-Digest-Auth, Web-Dir-Browsing,
Web-Dyn-Compression, Web-Http-Errors, Web-Http-Logging, Web-Http-Redirect, Web-Http-Tracing, Web-ISAPI-Ext, Web-ISAPI-Filter, Web-Lgcy-Mgmt-Console, Web-Metabase, Web-Mgmt-Console, Web-Mgmt-Service, Web-Net-Ext45, Web-Request-Monitor, Web-Server, Web-Stat-Compression,
Web-Static-Content, Web-Windows-Auth, Web-WMI, Windows-Identity-Foundation, Telnet-Client, RSAT-ADDS
on EX01
I have installed the Microsoft Unified Communications Managed API 4.0
Then I run the Exchange 2013 SP1 setup and the prerequisite check gives the following errors:
Error:
You must be a member of the 'Organization Management' role group or a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group to continue.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalServerInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedBridgeheadFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedCafeFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedFrontendTransportFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedMailboxFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedClientAccessFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedUnifiedMessagingFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Active Directory server is not available. Error message: Active directory response: The LDAP server is unavailable. See the Exchange setup log for more information on this
error.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx
Error:
Either Active Directory doesn't exist, or it can't be contacted.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.CannotAccessAD.aspx
I can connect with the Active Directory Sites and Domains and other applets to the AD. So Why these errors???
HELP!
Regards, Manu
Manu van WinkelHi, thanks for the answer.
I restarted the server and did the "run as administrator": same result.
The first errormessage in the exchangesetup.log is:
[ERROR] Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Active Directory server is not available. Error message: Active directory response: The LDAP server is unavailable. See the Exchange setup log for more information
on this error.
When I run dcdiag /s:DC01 from EX01 it passes all tests except:
DFSREvent "The RPC server is unavailable"
KccEvent "The RPC server is unavailable."
SystemLog "The RPC server is unavailable."
Could these be of any influence?
Running dcdiag on DC01 passes all tests.
The only thing I changed after setting up DC01, was changing the fixed IP-adres from 192.168.25.3 to 192.168.25.2, but I ran ipconfig /flushdns and ipconfig /registerdns and dcdiag /fix afterwards.
The only roles installed on DC01 are AD DS (I tried installing exchange before and after adding the AD DS role), AD, DNS, DHCP and Fileservices
I don't know where to look anymore....
Manu van Winkel -
Problem in Execute query on non-database block and database block together
Hi All,
In my form,i have
1. First block is Non-database block with one non-database item.
2. Second and third blocks are database blocks.
Now the problem is that i want to perform execute-query for all the blocks.
If the cursor is on the non-database item of 1st block and i clicks on the "Enter-query" then i am getting message " This function can not be performed here".
If i click on the item of the database block and then clicks on the "Enter-query" and then "execute-query" it's working fine.
But i don't want to do in this way.
My cursor will be on the First block only and then it should perform execute-query.
I am using this non-database item to copy value of this item to the item of the database block item.
I think i make you understand about my problem.
I am using forms 10g on Window xp.
Please help me.Hi!
Simply create a enter-query trigger on the non-database-block:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
enter_query;
end;If your search criteria is in the non-database-item in the first block,
you actually do not need the enter_query build-in.
Just create a execute-query trigger on the first block like:
begin
go_block ( 'database_block' );
execute_query;
go_item ( :System.trigger_item );
end;And in a pre-query trigger on the database-block copy the
value of your seach item into the item you want to search for.
Regards -
Database Prunning and database cloning?
Hi,
I would like to get help from someone about the database cloning and pruning can i get it?
thx
pradeepHi, plase review the next thread into this forum
Re: cloning using rman backups?
cloning
Good luck.
Regards. -
Database owner and database user with db_owner permission
we deployed a java hibernate application which creates the database tables on deployment. A login is created and mapped for the database as the user. For that login the db_owner role is given. On the deployment we received an error mentioning execute permission
issue.
the same process is done and this time the login is created but not mapped as the user. the login is assigned as the database owner from the database property. this time the deployment worked fine.
what is the difference between setting the login as database owner and setting as a user with db_owner role.The error i received was "the execute permission was denied on the object 'sp_tables'........".
I solved this issue by giving db_owner permission to master database for the relevant user.
In my local computer i didn't give permission to master database. I have only assign the user as the owner of the database and deployment was success.
But this error comes in another place where I implement the system.
if your application is not only a desktop application without anything critical on it, then I strongly advise to stay away from making anybody db_owner in the
master-database. That's THE system database. It's easy to take over that system for such an account then.
I am a bit surprised you are getting this error in that context. Originally the public role should have execute permission on it. So it seems someone has changed the defaults permissions (for hardening purposes?) Then reverting to original state is much
less harmful than the db_owner role.
Andreas Wolter (Blog |
Twitter)
MCSM: Microsoft Certified Solutions Master Data Platform, MCM, MVP
www.SarpedonQualityLab.com |
www.SQL-Server-Master-Class.com -
How do you delete specific message from users in Exchange 2013 DAG database?
Our network has been inundated with spam from INTUIT.COM with the SUBJECT: PAYMENT OVERDUE and contains a link to download a form from a Dropbox. Obviously, very suspicious and clearly spam. We're using Postini as our Edge Transport/ Spam filter but messages
are still getting in. I've enable anti-spam on all my mailbox servers, set the SCL values but that hasn't worked.
I understand that Exchange Edge Transport role has the more aggressive spam fighting features but Microsoft also recommends an online spam filter.
Needless to say, we've taken steps to quarantine those messages based on subject and sender in Postini but now would like to delete those messages from the users in went to. My users are two different DAG mailbox databases. I found this article http://www.techieshelp.com/delete-mail-from-multiple-mailboxes/ but
the command didn't work. I'm thinking its because I have DAG and a couple of databases. I even tried "get-mailbox -database "databasename" | search-mailbox -searchquery subject: "Payment Overdue"" and that didn't work.
I'm running Exchange 2013 SP1 DAG across two sites comprised of four 2013 SP1 mailbox servers.Check this out
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff459253%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx and specifically look at the section titled "Search messages and log the search results"
Or you can use this
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996371%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx with the WHATIF parameter
Alternatively if you are open the 3rd party solutions check out Lucid8's DigiScope
http://www.lucid8.com/product/digiscope.asp
which would allow you to see the search results and then delete OR if desired you can set the On FIND action to Export to PST and then Delete so that you can preserve and then remove messages on the fly as the search system finds
Search, Recover, & Extract Mailboxes, Folders, & Email Items from Offline Exchange Mailbox and Public Folder EDB's and Live Exchange Servers or Import/Migrate direct from Offline EDB to Any Production Exchange Server, even cross version i.e. 2003 -->
2007 --> 2010 --> 2013 with Lucid8's
DigiScope -
Hi,
I've got a lab with a domain controller and an Hyper-v with on it two multi-role exchange 2013 CU7 servers on W2K12 R2 OS, configured in DAG semplified (but the problem is the same also if I use the classical DAG configuration), a witness server, and a L7
load balancer for the exchange servers.
When I made the test to disable the OWA application pool where I've got the active mailbox database of the user, the balancer in correct manner redirect the session to the other exchange multi-role server, but the client in his OWA session is no more
able to send new mail with the error "Error your request can't be completed rigt now. Please try again later."
The only strange log that I see on the server in the MAPI client access directory where there is the following error message:
2015-01-21T08:00:45.132Z,956,1,/o=First Organization/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=1247f28558d24d4db872ab127b3e5810-Healt,,Microsoft.Exchange.RpcClientAccess.Monitoring.dll,15.0.0.0,Cached,,,,MapiHttp,Client=Microsoft.Exchange.RpcClientAccess.Monitoring,R:4ab7b6c8-54ee-4be3-aa9d-f8c856c4c47c:2,C:MAPIAAAAAOC4+7OCoZOjkqeKuoumlKSEtYO5ibyGs4bc/879z/vD9sX1zP28AwAAAAAAAA==|S:0-mGmHRQ==,OwnerLogon,0x6BB
(rpc::Exception),00:00:00.0310000,"Logon: Owner, /o=First Organization/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=1247f28558d24d4db872ab127b3e5810-Healt in database last mounted on Exch2.lab.net",RpcEndPoint: [ServerTooBusyException]
Client is being backed off -> [ClientBackoffException] Mailbox was moved to a different mailbox server. A client needs to retry. -> [IllegalCrossServerConnectionException] Cannot open mailbox /o=First Organization/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=1247f28558d24d4db872ab127b3e5810-Healt.
-> [MapiExceptionIllegalCrossServerConnection] Monitoring mailbox [] with application ID [Client=MSExchangeRPC] is not allowed to make cross-server calls from [Exch1.lab.net] to [Exch2.lab.net] [diag::AAAOAAAA/wAAAAAAAAAAAgAAAAA=],,,[email protected],
The CAS try to access the mailbox on the other server, but without success.
Someone have idea how to solve?
ThanksHi Hinte, sorry for the answer delay.
I've run the command you suggest to check the HealthMailbox status, but seems that all are fine:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>get-Mailbox -Monitoring | ft name, servername
Name ServerName
HealthMailbox7021deb6ae104dadbf52feedfa7fa68b exch1
HealthMailboxb83c9040b32e4d1197f7f54f6709bb7f exch1
HealthMailboxb1c32037890b43fbb2af2efe7c36ba00 exch1
HealthMailbox8d174269b494458daf9ade5099e22845 exch1
HealthMailboxaa7d10f02d2d4cc588243b291ead3e3a exch1
HealthMailboxeb32c30a019f42968a7cbc49a6ac3e65 exch1
HealthMailboxc6ff1d36ba154c5db5411b44718edcbd exch1
HealthMailbox75dc7caa7e8c4a3b812a01b607536d48 exch1
HealthMailbox16c86e512f454e7890b80c180ce19c00 exch1
HealthMailboxc6e447f7dba24d9b913f1dfcabe9f927 exch1
HealthMailbox40fa5a3f2abc4accae6286cd98abc90a exch1
HealthMailbox2712b9544bad4e7b8b671be2cda8cfde exch2
HealthMailboxe2559124da20499386bf8103dcb21e9b exch2
HealthMailbox3264c6078dad45d4a78c56a3afe81df1 exch1
HealthMailboxacacc51eb8bc4717b295ddf0adccf77e exch2
HealthMailbox64c4dd8cddac4c4e8bb7314010e797b1 exch1
HealthMailbox4a92bfa14fdd47fbb27c19513f6d2beb exch2
HealthMailbox465d2a69de93430e84b4d699a88cb0c3 exch1
HealthMailbox97b578e57cd44204820fffa416b25633 exch2
HealthMailboxb411059771db4647bb775c665ec29440 exch1
HealthMailboxf981dde6f4134f839bf41eb0000434e4 exch2
HealthMailboxc33801c7c3b1474f8aa6065249bb4fca exch1
HealthMailbox2282128ed8d14937998212edd15adf20 exch2
HealthMailboxe3d12b756cf545239b38be4607904ae1 exch2
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>
Regarding the test sugested to diable instead the OWA App Pool only the OWA virtual directory, I've not found on IIS the possibility to stop the access to this virtual directory.
Also on exchnage Administration page there is no the possibility to switch off this virtual directory only (or I don't found where is this setting).
Regards -
In Exchange 2013, Outlook finds a new connection point made up of the user’s mailbox GUID + @ + the domain portion of the user’s primary SMTP address. This change makes
it much less likely that users will see the dreaded message “Your administrator has made a change to your mailbox.”
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298114(v=exchg.150).aspx
Although the error message in the topic has been already improved a lot in Exchange 2013, the users may still encounter them in some specific scenarios. We have collected them and let’s discuss them in this thread.
Symptom
=======================================
Consider the following scenario:
Exchange 2013 was installed for a migration from Exchange 2007/2010.
The legacy Exchange server is removed after successful migration.
Exchange 2013 may be updated to Exchange 2013 SP1.
Some users were being randomly prompted with a popup in their outlook client with the following message when connecting with Exchange 2013 server:
“The Microsoft Exchange Administrator has made a change that requires you quit and restart Outlook”
Cause
=======================================
The issue may be caused due to Public Folders.
The msExchHomePublicMDB attribute on Exchange 2013 databases was set to deleted legacy public folder object.
Solution
=======================================
Removed the Public Folder from all the Exchange
2013 Databases. To do it, we can use ADSIedit.msc and remove the arrtibute - msExchHomePublicMDB from all the Databases:
1. Open ADSIEdit.
2. Connect to the Configuration container.3.
Expand Configuration, expand CN=Configuration,DC=Domain,DC=com.4. Expand CN=Services -> CN=Microsoft Exchange -> CN=Domain -> CN=Administrative Groups -> CN=Exchange
Administrative Group -> CN=Databases.5. In the right hand pane you will see a list of databases.6.
Right-click the listed database object -> Properties.7. Check whether the msExchHomePublicMDB value is set to an unavailable value. If you see reference to the old database,
please clear the value.8. Click OK.9. Check the rest of the databases to make sure
that they are not populated in the same way.
References:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/2f736bdd-1c00-4a22-97a5-95faeadf1495/exchange-2013-sp1-users-randomly-prompted-with-the-microsoft-exchange-administrator-has-made-a?forum=exchange2010
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/7a7b3cf8-8761-421c-9d55-6c84e05531c0/the-administrator-has-made-a-change?forum=exchangesvrclients
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/0d71c843-b662-493c-ab6e-30708929ef18/2013-sp1-problem-the-microsoft-exchange-administrator-has-made-a-change-that-requires-you-quit-and?forum=exchangesvrdeploy
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.This one? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2934750
-
I am getting very frustrated. It really shouldn't take over a week to install Exchange.
I have two domain controllers, Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 R2. The 2008 is now all Operations Masters for all roles.
I have a clean install of W2K8 R2 SP1 installed under Hyper-V on a separate physical W2K8 server. Before starting the install I used ADSIEdit to ensure there was nothing left in the AD of prior Exchange install attempts. This is the first and only installation
of Exchange.
I am running the install as the Domain\Administrator and naturally that account is a member of all the appropriate security groups. RSAT are installed on the Exchange server and using them to access Users and Computers clearly shows this. The install fails
with the errors below, all of which appear to be incorrect.
*** BEGIN ERROR ***
Error:
Global updates need to be made to Active Directory, and this user account isn't a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalUpdateRequired.aspx
Error:
You must be a member of the 'Organization Management' role group or a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group to continue.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalServerInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedBridgeheadFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedCafeFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedFrontendTransportFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedMailboxFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedClientAccessFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedUnifiedMessagingFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Couldn't find the Enterprise Organization container. See the Exchange setup log for more information on this error.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx
Error:
The forest functional level of the current Active Directory forest is not Windows Server 2003 native or later. To install Exchange Server 2013, the forest functional level must be at least Windows Server 2003 native.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.ForestLevelNotWin2003Native.aspx
Error:
This computer requires the Microsoft Unified Communications Managed API 4.0, Core Runtime 64-bit. Please install the software from http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260990.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.UcmaRedistMsi.aspx
Error:
This computer requires the update described in Microsoft Knowledge Base article KB974405 (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=262357). Please install the update, and then restart Setup.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.Win7WindowsIdentityFoundationUpdateNotInstalled.aspx
Error:
Either Active Directory doesn't exist, or it can't be contacted.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.CannotAccessAD.aspx
Warning:
Setup will prepare the organization for Exchange 2013 by using 'Setup /PrepareAD'. No Exchange 2007 server roles have been detected in this topology. After this operation, you will not be able to install any Exchange 2007 servers.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.NoE12ServerWarning.aspx
Warning:
Setup will prepare the organization for Exchange 2013 by using 'Setup /PrepareAD'. No Exchange 2010 server roles have been detected in this topology. After this operation, you will not be able to install any Exchange 2010 servers.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.NoE14ServerWarning.aspx
*** END ERROR
Why can't Exchange installation see the AD when everything else can?It appears that these error messages are pure fiction. I went back to ADSI Edit and removed some MS Exchange container and then reran setup /prepareschema again followed by setup /preparead and finally setup /mosde:install /role:clientaccess,mailbox and
it churned away for a long time, apparently working.
It appears than when it says you aren't a member of Schema Admins and that it can't access Active Directory, what it really means is it could find the AD just fine, but didn't like what it saw.
My guess would be very sloppy programming in which the low level error doesn't bubble up and so when something fails it just assumed you didn't have permissions.
It's not quite finished yet, but I am beginning to believe it will finish. So that's almost 6 days of non stop effort to install Exchange. It's hard top believe they are allowed to charge for this stuff. -
Primary mailbox (on Exchange 2010) and Personal Archive (on Exchange 2013), possible?
Current environment is Exchange 2010 SP3 RU5 supporting 4,000 Users. Client estate is Outlook 2010 SP1 going on SP2.
We're pulling our Archiving solution away from 3rd party and back into Exchange. Implementing a new set of Exchange 2010 Servers (old DAG or in a new Archive DAG) would be easy. But is there Exchange 2013 stepping stone potential?
Can the Archive DAG / Archive mailboxes be on 2013? i.e. for any given User, leave their primary mailbox on Exchange 2010 and create new Archive mailbox on 2013.
I want to avoid implementing 2010 Archive Servers and then go 2013 Archive 6 months or a year later.
This article suggests 'no':
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/dd979800(v=exchg.150).aspx
"Locating a user’s mailbox and archive on different versions of Exchange Server is not supported."
I've found little info but the odd statement here / there.
Is this the latest position? Is it that cut & dry? Anyone tried it? Why won't it work (or will it but it's not supported)?
Thanks!<I had a response from MS>
Below is a summary of the case for your records:
Symptom:
=============
Is it possible to implement a 2013 environment to host the Archive mailboxes? i.e. for any given User, their primary mailbox is on Exchange 2010 and their Archive
mailbox is on 2013.
Resolution:
=============
It’s not supported to have a user’s primary mailbox reside on an older Exchange version than the user’s archive. If the user’s primary mailbox is still on Exchange
2010, you must move it to Exchange 2013 before or at the same time when you move the archive to Exchange 2013.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj651146(v=exchg.150).aspx
as per the repro in our lab, having the archive mailbox in higher version of exchange would fail with the error above
<the scenario isn't completely relevant, looks like he's trying to put the Primary on 2013 and not the Archive, no matter, we've established there are problems, question is whether they are looking into this area / to patch, they go on...>
At this point in time we don’t have a conformation from the product team, if the above would change in the future exchange versions.
<MS did say on the call that they were not looking at fixing it, naturally this isn't a "never", as per previous statement - they can't commit 100% to the future, but they've provided me the answer - they are not currently looking at resolving/providing
this as a migration scenario, end.> -
I have a Exchange 2013, That has been running for a few months now since we moved it over, but now I get the Microsoft Outlook Message "The Microsoft Exchange Administrator has made a change that requires you to quit and restart Outlook." It only
shows up on certain users but not on others. What could be the problem? The only answers I have seen are for Exchange 2010.
All Help is much appreciatedThis one? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2934750
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to find Transaction for a Known Table maintenance View
Hello Friends, May I know how to find transaction for a known table maintenance View. Thanks, Best Regards, Sudhanshu Garg
-
Running the alv report in background and sending it thro email
hi, i have to run the alv report in background and send the output through email
-
ITunes music store is it down?
I cannot log onto the music store... Is it down or is anyone else having problems???
-
I have about 50 pages on all of which I've placed Google ads (usually 3 per page). How do i remove the ad source code without going in manually through 50 pages? I've been trying the "Find And Replace" feature, but the problem is that the each ad has
-
JComboBox Action Event problems
I have a complex UI with which I am having action event issues. Basically, the panel displays info about an object, which can be selected from within the panel through a button/popup window mechanism. A JComboBox (#1) selection determines the content