Testing cost

Hi, we do testing during receiving inpsection. there we issue raw material to perform testing on it and we use specific machines to perform test, some operators will perform test. basically we want to charge for materials and hrs spent by testers. please advise can we create seperate order type like testing order and treat it like any other production order in which we do GI, confirmation etc? whether qm orders will capture material cost and operator cost? is there any other method for the same. please advise.

Hi Raju,
To capture quality related cost in SAP, you need to go with the QM order, that will fulfill all your needs.
Kindly go through the links,
[http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/QMCOST/QMCOST.pdf]
[Quality related cost|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/5c/a8b43446a1c564e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm]
[QM order|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/2d/351d70448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Shyamal

Similar Messages

How to test costing sheet

I am new to CO, I have made some changes in costing sheet, now want to test if its working as expected.
What are the steps to calculate OH, settle and then display the result/ posting? What are the T.Codes involved?

Hi,
Go to bellow Link
http://www.sap-topjobs.com/SpecialPP/ProductcostingECC6.pdf
Thanks,
Raviteja.

Error in cost center assessment integration with FI

We just upgraded our test system with support pack SAPKH50020 and when we test cost center assessment, we are getting the error message "For document type SA, an entry is required in field Reference"
The same process is working in our production system, which is under support pack SAPKH50010. We are using the same doc type, and the configuration for this doc type is the same as in our test system.
OSS told us that the only solution is to change the doc type configuration or use a user exit to populate the Reference field.    However, I don't understand why this process is working in the old support pack and not in the new one.
Has anybody encountered the same issue? If so, how was it resolved?
thank you,
Lanny

Hi Phaneendra,
Thank you for your response. But the real question is why is this process different between support pack SAPKH50010 and SAPKH50020.   In support pack SAPKH50010, we also uses document type SA with reference field required, but the cost center assessment is able to post to it without any customization.    Now, in support pack SAPKH50020, this no longer works.    So I'm just wondering if any of you have encountered similar issue after upgrading the support pack.
thanks
Lanny

Recognizing external production costs for production order

Hi Experts,
Our company is new to SAP and one issue we have not resolved is whether it is possible to attach costs to an Inspection Plan, and ultimately have these costs flow with the production order to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS).
The objective is to enable us to analyze which specific customers/products require us to incur these additional costs. Any advice you have to accomplice our objective would be appreciated.
We are a Process Industry, and many materials are sent out for external testing. These costs are significant and some customers and/or products require more testing. We currently have Inspection Plans set up for each Material that requires testing, but have not found a way to burden the material with the appropriate COGS for the external testing.
For example, if a product must be tested for the following characteristics, and each test cost is known, how do we get the test costs attached to the production order for the total of $200?
Product 1 Inspection Plan
Salmonella $70
EColi $59
Coliform $25
Yeast/Mold $46
Thank you!

Richard,
Are you able to advise which forum is the proper one for this question?
Thank you,
Esther

Cost estimate that disregards Spec Prc Keys

We would like to do some test costing using Planned Price 1, 2, 3 to hold "what if" values.
Issue is that if a MRP Special procurement Key or Cost Special Procurement Key exits, the cost estimate follows that rule. (Of Course)
Is there a way to create Cost estimate config that ignores SPK (except 30 for subcontract) and then follows these rules:
Any help/suggestions would be appreciated
thanks
Althea

Hi.
The idea of the SPK in the costing view is don't consider the MRP SPK in the costing run, so PP boys have what they need to their SFC and planning purposes and costing boys have what they need in their standard cost.
Now, I dont understand something:
- you have SPK in the costing view ?
- You want to have this alternative strategy in other version of your cost estimate ?
+ If you want to select the cost like a external procurement process, you can create a SPK like this, and set in the costing view
When you run CK11N, the system trigger the flow you define for materials. In my example, my material is InHouse production but in CK11N i fill the cost with a user exit 9999.
About your question>
Is there a way to create Cost estimate config that ignores SPK (except 30 for subcontract) and then follows these rules:
Im Afraid not. In case of SPK 30 i guess you mean in the MRP view, you must set the Costing view blank or 30.
Just one more stuff, keep in mind the efect in the Cost Component Split in your standard cost.
Arturo.

Samples to be consided in planning and costing

Hi, as per iso standards we need to test certain samples like from 200 parts, we need to test 1 sample. so we cut a small piece from the raw material, we test. now our req is system to consider that sample qty in mrp planning and capture that testing cost? pls advise how can we map this in sap.

Hi
I could not understand your question relateD TO mrp. as per my understanding you are going to consider one metal sheet with 2.4x4.8m in dimensions and in that you are going to cut small portion of the stell piece for inspection..........right in that case it will not consider
but when you are doing production order confirmation that point you are going to maintain Yield and Scrap quantity to adjust to capture the cost
as per your 2nd question:
in Quality management view you have to maintain the order inspection type as QM01and settelement process to be followed as your requirement individual/collective and as well as QM02.
i hope it will give you an overview for your issue
Thanks
Shaik

Communications link test system (BER measurement)

I am currently brainstorming ideas on how to create a bit error rate (BER) measurement system across an ethernet communications link. What I have been thinking of doing is, using shift registers and some logic gates to create a pseudo-random bit sequence on the transmitting side. This sequence will then be sent across the ethernet via UDP (not TCP since I want errors to occur at other end), and received and compared with a locally generated PRBS. I just wanted to know what kind of difficulties might I face (such as synchronization issues, protocol issues, feasibility, etc.) and if there may be a better method to accomplishing such a test system from someone who may have had experience with this. The point of this is to test a wireless 802.11a/g network injected w/ noise. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
nilak

Hi Jerry,
Thank you very much for your reply.We are trying to introduce PXI solustion for semiconductor test for the production test. If the PXIe-5673 is capable of testing the IIP3, we would not willing to add one more signal generator.Because,you know,the test cost is very sensitive for the production test. The following is the test specification of DUT. Would you help to have a look?
Parameter
Condition
Frequency
Min.
Typ.
Max.
Unit
Intermodulation intercept point (IP3)
Two-tones 900 MHz, 5 MHz spacing
+10 dBm each tone
0.5–3 GHz
46
dBm
As I can see from the datasheet of 5673:", NI PXIe-5450 is capable of producing more than 100 MHz of RF bandwidth". For the frequecy,I think it should be able to generate two-tones 900MHz with 5MHz spacing.Is it? But I am not quite sure about the Intermodulation Distortion (IMD3) of the PXIe-5673's signal if we generate it in this case. Do you have any information I can refer to?
It will be highly appreciated if you can give some suggestions on it.

Javafx 2.1 Application UI Testing with javafx implementation.

Hi im new to javafx and to testing. A existing project developed in JavaFX 2.1 is requiring some automation implemented around the UI. Can anyone advise if JavaFX can be implemented within automation tools like QTP or Selenium?
Or perhaps advise is there are any existing tools on the market that we could leverage for our testing. Our goal would ideally we would like to keep testing costs to a minimum and use some open source tools.
Would appreciate any input from developers who perhaps have been working on existing projects in javafx that have automated solutions around them, if this is even available yet.
Many thanks.

It asks for FX 2.2, but take a look here: http://jemmy.java.net/JemmyFXGuide/jemmy-guide.html
Cheers for using JavaFX.

Automatic test generation and model based testing

Hi,
I would like used a model based testing tool called MaTeLo for generate my TestStand sequence files. It seems very powerfull and very quick to generate several different test cases in one click. I could simply update my model for generate new test cases.
What do you think about this tool ?
Mike

Hi Mike,
I think that MaTeLo is a good program for automatically generate TestStand sequence file.
In my knowledge, MaTeLo is the only model based testing tool which can generate TestStand sequence file.
MaTeLo offers a huge gain of engineering productivity by
providing a tool chain for modelling tests, automatically derive test
plans and calculate quality indicator of the system under test as test
coverage, reliability.
MaTeLo is used today by many companies to increase their product quality and kill their testing cost.
Why not ask an evaluation version of MaTeLo on the site All4Tec ?
Anthony

Ml81n- service entry sheet error

Dear Experts
I have getting error in Ml81n-service entry sheet,
i was tested cost center master data i has given in PO,in my company cost centers are delimited (01.04.2014 to 31.12.999 )
now system showing ks02-pop-up will get showing 2 delimited line item, i have execute in 1 line item not showing Profit enter, Second line item showing profir cnter.
Please provide me solution for that.

Can you please elaborate the issue what exactly you are
getting.

Receiver FCC Needs to Show Header Lines

Hi,
I'm making a Receiver File Adapter using File Content Conversion with an expected output of a CSV file. My structure is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<ns0:CostCenter_Test xmlns:ns0="http://namespace.com/xi/system/IF00000111/100" partition="SAPDemo" variant="SAP">
<CostCenter_CostCenterPull_Item>
     <item>
        <UniqueName>Unique</UniqueName>
        <CompanyCode>FRAA</CompanyCode>
        <CostCenterDescription1>Test Cost Center</CostCenterDescription1>
        <CostCenterDescription>Test Cost Center Ver 1234</CostCenterDescription>
     </item>
</CostCenter_CostCenterPull_Item>
</ns0:CostCenter_Test>
<item> node would be repeating.
Recordset Structure is: Main, item
Params:
Main.fieldSeparator: #
item.fieldSeparator: ","
item.beginSeparator: "
item.endSeparator: "'n'
Problem: I can't add a headerline.
Question: Is this because I have two 'structures'?
Another problem is that if I only make one Recordset Structure (i.e. item), the output would only be: "Unique". But it would show the header lines.
Do I need to add another 'structure', just for the header lines?

Hi,
You may add header line.
Define structure as
Root
   item
      field1
      field2 ....
and give item.addHeaderLine = 1.
It will generate header line as field1 , field2 ....
You may also define your own header line.
Please check below link for more information:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/44/686e687f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm]
Regards,
Beena.

Why is LOWER function producing a cartesian merge join, when UPPER doesn't?

Hi there,
I have an odd scenario that I would like to understand correctly...
We have a query that is taking a long time to run on one of our databases, further investigation of the explain plan showed that the query was in fact producing a Cartesian merge join even though there is clearly join criteria specified. I know that the optimiser can and will do this if it is a more efficient way of producing the results, however in this scenario it is producing the Cartesian merge on two unrelated tables and seemingly ignoring the Join condition...
*** ORIGINAL QUERY ***
SELECT count(*)
FROM    srs_sce sce,
            srs_scj scj,
            men_mre mre,
            srs_mst mst,
            cam_smo cam,
            ins_spr spr,
            men_mua mua,
           temp_webct_users u
WHERE sce.sce_scjc = scj.scj_code
AND sce.sce_stuc = mre.mre_code
AND mst.mst_code = mre.mre_mstc
AND mre.mre_mrcc = 'STU'
AND mst.mst_code = mua.mua_mstc
AND cam.ayr_code = sce.sce_ayrc
AND cam.spr_code = scj.scj_sprc
AND spr.spr_code = scj.scj_sprc
-- Ignored Join Condition
AND LOWER(mua.mua_extu) = LOWER(u.login)
AND SUBSTR (sce.sce_ayrc, 1, 4) = '2008'
AND sce.sce_stac IN ('RCE', 'RLL', 'RPD', 'RIN', 'RSAS', 'RHL_R', 'RCO', 'RCI', 'RCA');
*** CARTESIAN EXPLAIN PLAN ***
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 83
     20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 83 Bytes: 176 Cardinality: 1
          18 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 82 Bytes: 148 Cardinality: 1
               15 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 80 Bytes: 134 Cardinality: 1
                    13 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 79 Bytes: 123 Cardinality: 1
                         10 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 78 Bytes: 98 Cardinality: 1
                              7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 77 Bytes: 74 Cardinality: 1
NOTE: The Cartesian product is performed on the men_mre & temp_webct_users tables not the men_mua mua & temp_webct_users tables specified in the join condition.
                                   4 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 74 Bytes: 32 Cardinality: 1
                                        1 TABLE ACCESS FULL EXETER.TEMP_WEBCT_USERS Cost: 3 Bytes: 6 Cardinality: 1
                                        3 BUFFER SORT Cost: 71 Bytes: 1,340,508 Cardinality: 51,558
                                             2 TABLE ACCESS FULL SIPR.MEN_MRE Cost: 71 Bytes: 1,340,508 Cardinality: 51,558
                                   6 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.SRS_SCE Cost: 3 Bytes: 42 Cardinality: 1
                                        5 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.SRS_SCEI3 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 3
                              9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.SRS_SCJ Cost: 1 Bytes: 24 Cardinality: 1
                                   8 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.SRS_SCJP1 Cardinality: 1
                         12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.INS_SPR Cost: 1 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
                              11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.INS_SPRP1 Cardinality: 1
                    14 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.SRS_MSTP1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
               17 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.MEN_MUA Cost: 2 Bytes: 14 Cardinality: 1
                    16 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.MEN_MUAI3 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
          19 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.CAM_SMOP1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1                                    After speaking with data experts I realised one of the fields being LOWERed for the join condition generally always had uppercase values so I tried modifying the query to use the UPPER function rather than the LOWER one originally used, in this scenario the query executed in seconds and the Cartesian merge had been eradicated which by all accounts is a good result.
*** WORKING QUERY ***
SELECT count(*)
FROM srs_sce sce,
       srs_scj scj,
       men_mre mre,
       srs_mst mst,
       cam_smo cam,
       ins_spr spr,
       men_mua mua,
       temp_webct_users u
WHERE sce.sce_scjc = scj.scj_code
   AND sce.sce_stuc = mre.mre_code
   AND mst.mst_code = mre.mre_mstc
   AND mre.mre_mrcc = 'STU'
   AND mst.mst_code = mua.mua_mstc
   AND cam.ayr_code = sce.sce_ayrc
   AND cam.spr_code = scj.scj_sprc
   AND spr.spr_code = scj.scj_sprc
-- Working Join Condition
   AND UPPER(mua.mua_extu) = UPPER(u.login)
   AND SUBSTR (sce.sce_ayrc, 1, 4) = '2008'
   AND sce.sce_stac IN ('RCE', 'RLL', 'RPD', 'RIN', 'RSAS', 'RHL_R', 'RCO', 'RCI', 'RCA');
*** WORKING EXPLAIN PLAN ***
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 13
     20 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 146 Cardinality: 1
          19 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 13 Bytes: 146 Cardinality: 1
               17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 12 Bytes: 134 Cardinality: 1
                    15 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 11 Bytes: 115 Cardinality: 1
                         12 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 10 Bytes: 91 Cardinality: 1
                              9 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7 Bytes: 57 Cardinality: 1
                                   6 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 6 Bytes: 31 Cardinality: 1
                                        4 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5 Bytes: 20 Cardinality: 1
                                             1 TABLE ACCESS FULL EXETER.TEMP_WEBCT_USERS Cost: 3 Bytes: 6 Cardinality: 1
                                             3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.MEN_MUA Cost: 2 Bytes: 42 Cardinality: 3
                                                  2 INDEX RANGE SCAN EXETER.TEST Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                        5 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.SRS_MSTP1 Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
                                   8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.MEN_MRE Cost: 2 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
                                        7 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.MEN_MREI2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
                              11 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.SRS_SCE Cost: 3 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1
                                   10 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.SRS_SCEI3 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 3
                         14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SIPR.SRS_SCJ Cost: 1 Bytes: 24 Cardinality: 1
                              13 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.SRS_SCJP1 Cardinality: 1
                    16 INDEX RANGE SCAN SIPR.CAM_SMOP1 Cost: 2 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
               18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SIPR.INS_SPRP1 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1                                    *** RESULT ***
COUNT(*)
83299I am still struggling to understand why this would have worked as to my knowledge the LOWER & UPPER functions are similar enough in function and regardless of that why would one version cause the optimiser to effectively ignore a join condition.
If anyone can shed any light on this for me it would be very much appreciated.
Regards,
Kieron
Edited by: Kieron_Bird on Nov 19, 2008 6:09 AM
Edited by: Kieron_Bird on Nov 19, 2008 6:41 AM

My mistake on the predicate information, was in a rush to run off to a meeting when I posted the entry...
*** UPPER Version of the Explain Plan ***
| Id | Operation                     | Name             | Rows | Bytes | Cost | TQ    |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                   |     1 |   146 |   736 |        |      |            |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE               |                   |     1 |   146 |       |        |      |            |
|   2 |   SORT AGGREGATE              |                   |     1 |   146 |       | 86,10 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                  |                   |   241 | 35186 |   736 | 86,10 | PCWP |            |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN                 |                   |   774 |   105K|   733 | 86,09 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 5 |      HASH JOIN                |                   | 12608 | 1489K|   642 | 86,08 | P->P | BROADCAST |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS            |                   | 14657 | 1531K|   491 | 86,07 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 7 |        HASH JOIN              |                   | 14657 | 1359K|   490 | 86,07 | PCWP |            |
|* 8 |         HASH JOIN             |                   | 14371 |   996K|   418 | 86,06 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 9 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SRS_SCE           | 3211 |   106K|   317 | 86,00 | S->P | BROADCAST |
|* 10 |          HASH JOIN            |                   | 52025 | 1879K|   101 | 86,06 | PCWP |            |
|* 11 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL   | MEN_MRE           | 51622 | 1310K|    71 | 86,01 | S->P | HASH       |
| 12 |           INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SRS_MSTP1         |   383K| 4119K|    30 | 86,05 | P->P | HASH       |
| 13 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SRS_SCJ           |   114K| 2672K|    72 | 86,02 | S->P | HASH       |
|* 14 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN      | INS_SPRP1         |     1 |    12 |       | 86,07 | PCWP |            |
| 15 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL       | MEN_MUA           |   312K| 4268K|   151 | 86,03 | S->P | HASH       |
| 16 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN     | CAM_SMOP1         |   527K| 9796K|    91 | 86,09 | PCWP |            |
| 17 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL         | TEMP_WEBCT_USERS | 33276 |   194K|     3 | 86,04 | S->P | HASH       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access(UPPER("MUA"."MUA_EXTU")=UPPER("U"."LOGIN"))
   4 - access("CAM"."AYR_CODE"="SCE"."SCE_AYRC" AND "CAM"."SPR_CODE"="SCJ"."SCJ_SPRC")
   5 - access("MST"."MST_CODE"="MUA"."MUA_MSTC")
   7 - access("SCE"."SCE_SCJC"="SCJ"."SCJ_CODE")
   8 - access("SCE"."SCE_STUC"="MRE"."MRE_CODE")
   9 - filter(SUBSTR("SCE"."SCE_AYRC",1,4)='2008' AND ("SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCA' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCE' OR
              "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCI' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCO' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RHL_R' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RIN' OR
              "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RLL' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RPD' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RSAS'))
10 - access("MST"."MST_CODE"="MRE"."MRE_MSTC")
11 - filter("MRE"."MRE_MRCC"='STU')
14 - access("SPR"."SPR_CODE"="SCJ"."SCJ_SPRC")
Note: cpu costing is off
40 rows selected.*** LOWER Version of the Explain Plan ***
| Id | Operation                     | Name             | Rows | Bytes | Cost | TQ    |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                   |     1 |   146 |   736 |        |      |            |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE               |                   |     1 |   146 |       |        |      |            |
|   2 |   SORT AGGREGATE              |                   |     1 |   146 |       | 88,10 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                  |                   |   257K|    35M|   736 | 88,10 | PCWP |            |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN                 |                   |   774 |   105K|   733 | 88,09 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 5 |      HASH JOIN                |                   | 12608 | 1489K|   642 | 88,08 | P->P | BROADCAST |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS            |                   | 14657 | 1531K|   491 | 88,07 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 7 |        HASH JOIN              |                   | 14657 | 1359K|   490 | 88,07 | PCWP |            |
|* 8 |         HASH JOIN             |                   | 14371 |   996K|   418 | 88,06 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 9 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SRS_SCE           | 3211 |   106K|   317 | 88,00 | S->P | BROADCAST |
|* 10 |          HASH JOIN            |                   | 52025 | 1879K|   101 | 88,06 | PCWP |            |
|* 11 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL   | MEN_MRE           | 51622 | 1310K|    71 | 88,01 | S->P | HASH       |
| 12 |           INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SRS_MSTP1         |   383K| 4119K|    30 | 88,05 | P->P | HASH       |
| 13 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SRS_SCJ           |   114K| 2672K|    72 | 88,02 | S->P | HASH       |
|* 14 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN      | INS_SPRP1         |     1 |    12 |       | 88,07 | PCWP |            |
| 15 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL       | MEN_MUA           |   312K| 4268K|   151 | 88,03 | S->P | HASH       |
| 16 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN     | CAM_SMOP1         |   527K| 9796K|    91 | 88,09 | PCWP |            |
| 17 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL         | TEMP_WEBCT_USERS | 33276 |   194K|     3 | 88,04 | S->P | HASH       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access(LOWER("MUA"."MUA_EXTU")=LOWER("U"."LOGIN"))
   4 - access("CAM"."AYR_CODE"="SCE"."SCE_AYRC" AND "CAM"."SPR_CODE"="SCJ"."SCJ_SPRC")
   5 - access("MST"."MST_CODE"="MUA"."MUA_MSTC")
   7 - access("SCE"."SCE_SCJC"="SCJ"."SCJ_CODE")
   8 - access("SCE"."SCE_STUC"="MRE"."MRE_CODE")
   9 - filter(SUBSTR("SCE"."SCE_AYRC",1,4)='2008' AND ("SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCA' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCE' OR
              "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCI' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RCO' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RHL_R' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RIN' OR
              "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RLL' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RPD' OR "SCE"."SCE_STAC"='RSAS'))
10 - access("MST"."MST_CODE"="MRE"."MRE_MSTC")
11 - filter("MRE"."MRE_MRCC"='STU')
14 - access("SPR"."SPR_CODE"="SCJ"."SCJ_SPRC")
Note: cpu costing is off
40 rows selected.As you state something has obviously changed, but nothing obvious has been changed.
We gather statistics via...
exec dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats(ownname => 'USERNAME', estimate_percent => DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE , degree => 4, granularity => ''ALL'', cascade => TRUE);
We run a script nightly which works out which indexes require a rebuild and rebuild those only it doesn;t just rebuild all indexes.
It would be nice to be able to use the 10g statistics history, but on this instance we aren't yet at that version, hopefully we will be there soon though.
Hope this helps,
Kieron

Enterprise Mode site list and manual override

I have a small question / issue when using Enterprise Mode.
We have enabled it using GPO by specifying both a site list and the Enable settings for manual override. This works fine but I don't know how to reset the manual override if somebody flicks the EM mode for a specific site.
I just want to tell IE to forget all manual overrides and apply the sitelist as delivered.
I tried to look in the registry, in the %AppData% fodler, even cleared the IE cache but IE still remembers the user overrides.
Any help will be really appreciated.
Thanks, Nic.

Hi Nic,
As the official documents said, this registry key [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\EnterpriseMode] “Enable” = “” | {URL:port} can also be used to collect manual overrides. By configuring the “Enable” key with a
valid URL and port, Internet Explorer will initiate a simple POST to the supplied address whenever a user enables or disables Enterprise Mode. This effectively helps customers crowd-source lists of compatible Web apps from their own users, which may decrease
triage and testing costs.
Approximately 65 seconds after Internet Explorer 11 starts, it looks for a properly formatted site list. If a new site list is found, with a different version number than the active list, Internet Explorer 11 loads and uses the newer version.
This is designed by default, and we cannot reset the by preventing the changes.
We may try to logon script to re-deploy the original site list to reset the site list settings.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

NI USB 6008 AI acquisition and DO pulse genereation

Dear LabVIEW users,
Greetings for everyone. I am a beginner of LabVIEW and I have a problem, which I have solved partially. I would really appreciate your help and suggestions as I searched for days without any luck. The problem is as following:
I am acquiring AI voltage (continous) from 4-8 accelerometers. At the same time, I am sending a digital output signal each time when the sample rate is clicked (i.e. 1000, 2000, 3000, .... if sampling rate is 1000). In other words, trying to send a digital output signal (at some frequency 'n' Hz) at regular 1 second interval (according to hardware level). So that the digital output signal will blink an LED at every one second. Further, I need to write the AI (voltage) signals, and LED blink PC (software) timestamps separately. All the above said steps are followed in my .vi program but the real hardware/software level operations are killing my timestamps. In other words each LED blink timestamps are not accurate when I use LabVIEW measurement file express VI (difference is not atleast to the third decimal place). In addition, the timestamping is somewhat OK when I disable the LVM file write VI. Onemore thing I noticed is that, physically LED blinks every two second once, I suspect this is due to the shift register and loop delay of second. Is there a way to control the blink speed (i.e. boolean state has to change at every 500ms without delaying the inner while loop).
Results and observations:
LabVIEW 2011 .vi, timestamp files with and without LVM file generator (express VI) are all attached. Please note that there is a considerable amount of drift in consecutive timestamps when LVM file generator is used, on the other hand there is 0.001 ms drift when LVM file generator is not used. The reason for PC timestamps are to roughtly align different measurements or observations or events in global time scale.
Please give me any suggestions or help me to make it atleast accurate for milliseconds within the witten VI. Lastly, is there any relatively inexpensive USB DAQ module which can send a pulse to directly from pulse channel to digital output channels when sample rate of 'n' Hz is achieved by hardware level which could be every accurate, so that software delay is fully minimized. Although there are highly sophistiated hardwares from NI, but our goal of this project is to build and test cost effective system.
Thank you and I really appreciate your inavluable time and effort. Have a great weekend!
With Regards,
Paghalaya
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
LabVIEW File Folder.zip ‏113 KB

Paghalaya,
Software timing when using a desktop operating system will never be precise to the millisecond level. The USB-6008 has hardware timing only for the AI function. The DO is software timed.
To get precise 500 ms intevals for the DO, you will need to use a device with hardware timed digital outputs.
Some things which might improve your VI, although they will not solve all your problems:
1. Consider a parallel loop architecture (suche as Producer/Consumer). Moving the File writes to a separate loop from the data acquisition may reduce the timing jitter on the DO.
2. Acquire 500 samples twice per second rather than 1000 samples once per second. That will allow you to get the DO timing closer to what you want. It will not be perfect, but the hardware timing of the AI will help.
3. Dev1/ai0:3 (maybe Dev1/ai0:ai3) should get all four channels at once. I do not have DAQmx so I am not sure of the syntax.
4. You have the Write to Measurement File Express VI set to overwrite the file. Is that what you really want?
Lynn

OWB vs Informatica, Performance

Hi
I am working on a Proof of Concept which is looking to replace Informatica with OWB. A key factor to the success of the proof of concept is performance.
At present, the OWB mappings seems to be considerably slower, which does not make much sense to me. I have compared the SQL generated from Informatica with the SQL generated from OWB, and they are pretty much the same. They key difference between the two solutions, is an initial processing of the data file. In the OWB solution, this is used as an external table and a number of mapping perform validation functions to prepare the data for further processing. In the Informatica solution, this validation is preformed a file system level, using data caching.
My experince of data caching is fairly limited. Is this a key way to reduce runtime of processing. Is this an advantage of Informatica over OWB, as this is performed outside the database.
Are there any other performance related areas which informatica beat OWB. Surely OWB should always win.
Any feedback would be gratefully received.
Thanks in advance.

LS,
I do not have any more hints for you than stated earlier, only more explicitly maybe. Forget the proof of concept.
Either you choose for the one (and only OWB) or for the other. Choise has already been made in the past and the develop/test costs spent.
If you do not know:
- how much money you can actually spent during production with OWB
- how much time/skills/money you can spent during proof of concept of OWB
- how much time/skills/money you can spent during rewriting and conversion of ETL-proces
your battle (proof of concept) is lost at forehand.
The solution of any detail like performance is a waist of time.
OWB and Oracle can function really fast, if
- the right hardware is available
- the right skills are available at ETL-design time.
Do not try to build an even more beautiful castle than the current with only a toothbrush during a proof of concept. Keep the comparison fair.
I would give this assignment back to where it came from.
Regards,
André

Testing cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for