TestStand/​LabView Engineer - Tektronix, Beaverton, Oregon

If you are interesting in working in TestStand (and some LabView), you can apply for a job in Tektronix Manufacturing:
https://jobs.tek.com/OA_HTML/OA.jsp?akRegionCode=I​RC_VIS_VAC_DISPLAY_PAGE&akRegionApplicationId=800&​.....

Similar Messages

  • LabVIEW Engineer Direct Hire 75k

    LabVIEW Engineer, Full Time, FargoND
    Purpose
    Lead the development of automated test, data acquisition, and control systems using LabVIEW. Involves direct customer contact some travel.
    Requirements
    - BS in Science or Engineering.
    - 5+ years of experience developing automated test, measurement, data acquisition, and control systems
    - 5+ years LabVIEW and/or TestStand development experience
    - Experience with a variety of programmable instruments. Experience with National Instruments hardware a plus.
    - Experience writing system and software requirements specifications.
    - Effective learning, utilizing, and applying new technology.
    Helpful Skills
    - Excellent verbal and written communication skills
    - Strong hands-on hardware troubleshooting and software debugging skills
    - Custom hardware design skills a plus, including fixtures, analog and digital circuits, cable assemblies, enclosures, and turn-key systems
    - Experience creating documentation, UML, system diagrams, schematic diagrams, P&ID
    - Project leadership, project management, engineering group leadership experience a plus
    Responsibilities
    - Design, develop, implement, and document test, measurement, data acquisition, and control systems using LabVIEW and TestStand
    - Evaluate requirements specifications; Develop technical proposals
    - Supervise and provide technical mentoring to junior engineers
    - Devise, document, and oversee execution of test strategies
    If you are interested in learning more please contact Bill Ties 1-800-357-8403 or [email protected]

    Incorrect board.  Please move to: LabVIEW Job Openings

  • Data access in Teststand/LabVIEW through OPC connection

    We are using TestStand 2.0 and LabVIEW6.2 and following problem occurs when accessing the datas from UUT through OPC.
    For the first UUT i get the measurement datas but starting the next UUT causes a system hang up. The corresponding LabVIEW VI stops at the connect to the OPC Server it doesn't read the selected item. Only with LabVIEW there is no problem launching OPC data access for multiple times. Does anyone have expierence with this configuration: TestStand-LabVIEW-OPC?

    For your information, there is a new TestStand Add-on "OPC DA Connect" which adds a StepType Palette dedicated to OPC Data Access.
    You can configure each step by browsing the OPC servers on your network and browsing variables within these servers.
    This toolkit has free deployment licence.
    Hoping this helps.
    Jean-Louis SCHRICKE
    ├ CTA - Certified TestStand Architect (2008 & 2010 & 2014)
    ├ CTD - Certified TestStand Developer (2004 & 2007)
    └ CLD - Certified LabVIEW Developer (2003 & 2005)

  • Labview engineer looking for job in china

    I am a labview engineer for more than one year in philips lighting (shanghai china).Working on labview7 and RS232,GPIB interface instruments.Now I looking for a job in shanghai china.
    more detail please contact [email protected]

    Hi Alec,
    Your organisation sponsor visa for non-local residents?

  • Labview engineer needed at Pune

    Dear Sir,
    We are looking for Labview engineer with electrical knowledge (preferable) wishing to work as freelancer for a project  contact urgently at [email protected]  9822027137
    Message Edited by aasss on 02-16-2010 04:45 AM

    Please let me know the years of experience the candidate should have.
    Sunil.
    My Blog  Host your website for free!  Home PC as webserver

  • What kind of FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition?

    I am using FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition to process signal acquired from the TDS3032B.But i dont know what kind of this filter(Window,least-squares,or equiripple...).Does any one know about this?

    Check out some of NIs links:
    Virtual Instrumentation Empowers Digital Signal Processing Design
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4759
    Designing Filters Using the NI LabVIEW Digital Filter Design Toolkit
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3237
    lots of information about different FIR can be found by searching on google as well.
    National Instruments

  • Experienced LabVIEW Engineer looks for part time projects

    Swedish LabVIEW Engineer with over 5 years of experience. Speciallity: analysis and Vision applications.
    Looks for smaller part time projects (that can be performed at distance).

    Hi,
    I have 6 years of experiences in labview application.I would like to develop the code through the internet.
    Kindly let me know if the openings still available. 

  • I am stunned by TestStand suport engineer's answer to my bug report?

    Okay, my HTML is bit rusty. here it is.
    So, I ran into this problem that when I put a continued inequality expression (a<x<b) in a Pass/Fail step, it will always pass. This is very easy to duplicate, say you have a local varible x = 3, in a Pass/Fail test step's Data Source Expression you put "0<=Locals.x<=2". Then it will always pass when you run it. If you set b to less than 1, say 0.5, then it will always fail. So I reported this as a bug to NI support. Here is what I got for explanation:
    NI support/application engineer:
    "I was looking into this behavior further and what is actually happening is that for "a<=x<=b", the program is evaluating a<=x, returning 1 if true or 0 if false, and then checking if that 1 or 0 is <=b. This is why a pass was always returned by your code. I still think that recognizing the continued inequality expression would be a good addition to teststand, so i will suggest this change to R&D."
    me:
    "In that case, it's just simply wrong (as a bug would cause) since it assumes that b is somewhere between 0 and 1. I don't think that TestStand should check the Boolean return value from evaluating a<=x against b, that does not even make sense or someone did not know what he was doing. It should be reported as a bug, not a feature request for future release."
    NI support/application engineer:
    "I'm sorry that you feel this way, but this syntax would be executed in the same way by any programming language. the <= or < operators are treated like any operator such as * or +, and so this behavior is completely expected by order of operations. just as a*x*b would find a*x, then apply that result to {result}*b, a<x<b calculates the result of a<x (1 or 0) and applies that result to {result}<b. I do understand your frustration, but this is not a bug; it is completely expected behavior. Please let me know if you have any other questions about this issue."
    me:
    "Do you really want me to spell this out to you?! I would feel embarrassed if I were you. But you insisted, so here it goes.
    You are correct that these operators are treated the same in any programming language. Here is where you got lost, read this again - "just as a*x*b would find a*x, then apply that result to {result}*b, a<x<b calculates the result of a<x (1 or 0) and applies that result to {result}<b."
    Why in the world that you would substitute variable x with the result from evaluating a<x for the second comparison x<b?
    The answer is that "{result}<b is just NOT the same as x<b". Do you see the problem now?
    Do you know the difference between a Boolean and an integer? 1 and 0 can be used to present a Boolean, but when you plug it in an integer comparison and it will be used as an integer which throws the whole comparison out of water. I don't think that any other programming language would do that."
    NI support/application engineer:
    "I am very sorry that you were not satisfied with my explanation of the problem. I understand that this result is not desirable, but the underlying reason is that TestStand does not understand that you are trying to compare a<x and x<b in the same statement. The continued inequality is an implied conjunction of two comparisons, and TestStand (and other programming languages) do not know how to interpret this implication. I realize that this is not intuitive, and though I would agree that a<x<b seems like it would return 1 if x is between a and b and 0 otherwise, this is not a recognized syntax by TestStand and other languages."

    Hi CT,
    I agree with you completely that this may be undesired behavior depending upon exactly what code is being written. Thanks for bringing to our attention any behavior that seems undesired, we always want to know about these types of things!
    I ran the pseudo code "a<x<b" where a, x, and b are numbers in a few different environments:
    VB6: This returns true for any x value.
    C#: This does not compile, due to a type mismatch.
    C++: This returns true for any x value. 
    C: This returns true for any x value. 
    LabVIEW: Using comparison functions, this results in a broken wire due to a type mismatch 
    LabVIEW: Using a MathScript Node, this returns true for any x value.
    I would say, generally speaking, it is accepted behavior to
    type cast a Boolean result to an integer when the next function
    requires integer parameters. In every language, using  the logical AND operator, as Jigg suggested, removes any chance of ambiguity between the coder and the compiler.  
    The good news is that the product suggestion that the support engineer filed on your behalf will still be reviewed by R&D. So, whether this is a bug or a feature request, it will get its due attention.
    Message Edited by Evan P. on 10-15-2008 08:25 PM
    Evan Prothro
    RF Systems Engineer | NI

  • Event CallBack in TestStand - Labview OI

    Hi everyone,
    i am using the simple interface for labview of teststand, i have modified the interface what i like, now what i want to do is when the user press the control button to execute a sequence the system ask the user for something and depending of it answer execute or not the sequence, for this i have create a new event callback, modifying the configure event callback.vi, what i introduce in the Reg Event Callback is that when StartExecution event starts it run the callback vi that contains the question to the user.
    It works well because when the user press the run sequence control button or the restart contorl button, the system ask the user. But the problem is when the user press the exit control button, the system ask too.
    Why occurs this, and how can i fix it??
    Thank you in advance

    Hi Marith,
    This behavior is occurring because the Application Manager automatically executes the FrontEndCallbacks sequence file when the Operator interface starts, and again as part of the shutdown.  To prevent this from occurring, we'll need to check that the execution is not the FrontendCallbacks execution before launching the dialog (the other case is "FrontEndCallbacks.Seq"):
    You also may want to consider a couple alternative implementations:
    use the UImessage event to run the code when the UIMsg_ModelState_Initializing message is posted (when the process model begins executing)
    putting this code in the process model rather than the User interface - in this case we could just add a step in the setup of the model, and terminate the execution if the user chooses.
    Al B.
    Staff Software Engineer - TestStand
    CTA/CLD

  • I'm using TestStand/Labview to do a string value test. Is there any way to use a variable in the edit string value test?? This forces you to hard code a string to test against.

    I'm using TestStand 2.0/Labview 6i to do a string value test. Is there any way to use a string variable in the edit string value test instead of an actual string?? This forces you to hard code a string to test against.

    Hi ART,
    You can also use the LimitLoader step to load your string into to step similar to the Numeric Step type.
    There should be an example of this in the Resource Library | TestStand
    Regards
    Ray Farmer
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

  • Is it possible to add a Graph in the Teststand Labview OI

    Is it possible to add a graph to the Labview OI so that data can be passed up via the sequence context? Would posting a UI Message be the right way to trigger the graph to update? I'm not sure how to do this since the graph is not a UI control.
    Has anyone done this or is better to just pop-up a graph in a sequence step?  

    paulmw,
    I have not tried this, but one way you could do this is by running the VI with the same version of the LabVIEW run-time engine that the OI was build with.  The LV OI will load the run-time engine initially.  When TestStand runs the test VI, it will try to first load the run-time engine specified in the adapter configuration.  If the specified version is the same as the version used by the LV OI, it will used the one in memory.  Since TestStand and the OI share the same run-time engine, creating a queue in the OI and populating with the VI run by TestStand will theorically work.  Like I said, I have not tried this, but I am assuming it will work.   The key is to make sure the LV version used to create the LV OI executable and the VI are the same.
    Jose

  • Experienced LabVIEW engineer, Specializing in Semiconductor and Biotech/DNA applications; Bay Area or Online

    I am an engineer-turned-LabVIEW programmer with 14 years of LabVIEW and industry experience in the San Francisco Bay Area
    I have worked and programmed the following types of systems:
    Semiconductors
    Bioinformatics/DNA Synthesis and Sequencing
    Digital Imaging
    Fermentation
    Solar Energy
    Chemical Processing Systems
    General Automation and Custom Analysis
    Real-time and Embedded Systems
    I can provide CORP-to-CORP hourly contracting, or it may be possible to work out licensing agreements, depending on your needs and the product.
    Please contact me at [email protected] and see http://www.zojosoft.com for  more information.
    Jed Davidow

    Dear Sir,
    With reference to the website of your company I came to know that there always are the vacancies for the suitable candidates and hence I wish to apply for the same.Currently working in hydraulic environment I am approaching you through this application with great enthusiasm, that I have scope and chance to show my ability and contribute my efforts in well direction. I am enclosing here with my complete Curriculum Vitae .
    I am currently working with M/s Minar Hydrosystems PVT. LTD. in Nagpur which is one of the largest manufacturers of hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders, jacks etc. I am In charge for quality department having complete knowledge of instruments with level II in non destructive and automated non destructive techniques. Also handling SAP module in current company with effective administration.
    If you need further information regarding my candidature please do write/call me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rushikesh P. Deogade
    Nagpur, India
    Ph.:- +91 9923858523
    Attachments:
    B.E. Mechanical with 3 years exp as a QC Incharge.doc ‏25 KB

  • Yogesh Redemptor - LabVIEW Engineer

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    I am a Mechatronics Engineer. And I am a NI certified LabVIEW Developer (CLD).
    I have 3.5 years of experience in the Test & Measurement field.
    I have 2 years of experience in 'LabVIEW Offshore Development Centers'
    Currently I am working in K.M. Integrators Pvt Ltd as System Engineer – Technical Lead in Industrial Automation Field (NI LabVIEW).
    Herewith I am sending my detailed resume for your kind Perusals.
    Please let me know if you have any requirment.
    Thank you,
    Yogesh Redemptor
    Regards,
    Yogesh Redemptor
    Attachments:
    Yogesh Redemptor Resume.doc ‏54 KB

    Please let me know the years of experience the candidate should have.
    Sunil.
    My Blog  Host your website for free!  Home PC as webserver

  • [TestStand][LabVIEW]faire module labview pour teststand

    Bonjour,
    Je suis a la recherche de tutoriel pour faire des modules LabVIEW pour TestStand.
    J'ai trouvé les fonctions TestStand dans LabVIEW "Get Property Value" and co. mais je n'arrive pas à les mettre en oeuvre.
    Merci
    Résolu !
    Accéder à la solution.

    Bonjour,
    Je cherche à envoyé des requêtes en TCP/IP sur un module 'maison', et récupérer les éventuels réponse. (LabVIEW)
    Faire cette procédure en boucle jusqu'a ce que je reçoive une réponse comportant une anomalie, l'arrêter (par ex) et l'inscrire dans un rapport. (TestStand)
    J'ai déjà fait le Module LabVIEW, j'aimerai intégrer ce module dans une séquence TestStand pour automatisé l'envoie et la prise de décision en fonction de la réponse reçu.
    Donc au final pouvoir choisir ce que j'envoie avec TestStand:
    [TestStand:    requêtes -> [LabVIEW] -> réponses ]
    Assez compréhensible ?
    Cordialement,
    Anthelme
    P.S.: Je dois avoué ne pas avoir compris vos solutions proposé...

  • What is the best way to use TestStand/Labview to access database?

    Is it best to use the TestStand database step types or use existing Labview database connectivity code to access database?
    The database will contain configuration data and results data. I am also not using the standard results collection feature. (Test procedure will possibly last days so I think it is inappropriate to use results collection feature.)
    I'm just trying to make my code "future proof".
    Thanks

    tbob wrote:
    I have used both and I find that it is easier to use the Labview Database Connectivity Toolset. One step in a TestStand sequence can call the Labview vi. If done in TestStand, it takes many steps which I find harder to read and understand compared to Labview code. If it is just a simple one time access, TestStand may be a little easier, depends on one's preference.
    Thanks.
    I was thinking it would be easier to use the Labview code. I was just trying to sense if the community thought it was old hat and I should be using the TestStand code.

Maybe you are looking for