Tethered Capture feature request - make a 2nd copy

Make a 2nd copy feature is available during import of images, so why not whilst shooting tethered. Would love to see that feature. Please please please consider adding.

Short answer: No. That is the way it is.
Why? The Make Second Copy during Import is designed to be a backup of your memory card processes-not a back up of your files as you store them on disk. It is intended to be a transient copy that allows you an immediate backup until such time as a File System Level backup can be performed, allowing you to have two copies so that you can reformat your memory cards.
I agree it would be nice if the folder storage strategy was duplicated for the backup as it is created for the import but that is not something you can set the program to do currently.  I remember it behaving differently versions ago but do not recall exactly how it used to work.

Similar Messages

  • Feature Request: Photo Borders and Copying in Books

    These are a few related feature requests. If anyone knows of a better way to do this with the current software, then I would love to hear it.
    When making books I like to have borders around the pictures of various colors (usually black or white) and various widths. In Apeture this is a pain to do. I fiqured out that I could fake it by making a picture box and inserting a solid black picture into it and then creating a smaller picture box in front of it for my real photo. This might be tolerable if I could at least then select both picture boxes and their contents to copy and then onto other pages as a template that I can resize as needed.
    Ideally I would love to be able to copy and paste multiple elements on a book page and I would like to be able to define photo borders. Any chance of seeing this in the near future?
    Thanks,
    Sean

    Thanks for the reply. You are right, the cut and paste works fine, it just didn't work the way I expected it to. Maybe that is a GUI design thing to consider. I was actually trying to click and drag a selection box like you might do in iPhoto to select multiple images that are right beside each other. This doesn't work at all in Aperture, but your method does work just fine.
    I agree with the other poster that some additional features like:
    Photo Borders
    Export to PSD (with layers)
    Custom page sizes and Custom themes
    would be very nice and start to make that tool truley useful.
    Thanks for a really nice product. Keep up the good work and stay ahead of the pack.
    Sean

  • Posting Feature Requests for others to Copy/Paste

    I recently posted a Feature Request I sent to Adobe for another member to copy/paste as his own FR since he liked the suggestion (see the FR below). 
    After doing so, I got the idea that we could all do this: copy/paste FRs we send to Adobe into threads on this forum to help each other support the idea with similar requests, or even copy/paste the FR as our own.  With limited resources and time, there's only so many requests Adobe can implement in every new version.   That why it's so important that new features the Premiere Pro team invests their hard work and time on be the tools that would benefit the greatest number of editors.  The more people back up certain ideas, the more likely they'll be implemented sooner than later.
    There's power in numbers, so how about using this forum to share our best ideas and make it easier for others to add their voice of support?  It's great that Adobe provides us with a way to send them feedback, but it's too bad that it's a one-way conversation with very little, if any, dialogue back and forth between the submitter and Adobe.  That's why I thought it would be great to bring more of that potential dialogue here, where we can share ideas and support the creation of an ever better Premiere Pro!
    If you've never posted a FR or BR (Bug Report) before, you can easily join the effort to make Premiere Pro become all that it can be, here: www.adobe.com/go/wish
    Comments?  Ideas?  Please share!
    Here's the FR I pasted in another thread, as an example. 
    *******Enhancement / FMR*********
    Brief title for your desired feature:  Drag&Drop Modified clips into Project Window
    How would you like the feature to work?
    Ability to Drag&Drop clips with effects, motion settings, keyframes and/or markers back into the Project Window from the Timeline for later use.
    Why is this feature important to you?
    The Project Window is far better than Sequences for storing/organizing modified clips for future use, since it is:
    Searchable
    Sortable
    Viewable in Icon and List views
    Full of helpful metadata columns such as 'Video/Audio Usage'
    Foolproof in that the original sequence can be deleted without losing any created subclips
    Given these advantages, why only allow us to store modified clips in Sequences? Please fix this by allowing users to Drag&Drop clips from the Timeline to the Project Window while preserving all of their modifications (effects, keyframes, motion settings and/or markers).

    Comments?  Ideas?  Please share!
    As it has already been discussed in this thread (and duplicated threads are not allowed in Adobe Forums), the aforementioned feature request is mainly based on the false statement that an editor can either store raw clips in the Project panel or modified clip in the timeline. That's false because an editor can nest modified clip right in the timeline and the nested sequence will be automatically stored in the Project panel, turning into a regular reusable asset.
    Unfortunately, the OP, as was also outlined in the duplicated thread, carefully avoids any mentioning this ability, which becomes your second nature if you use After Effects (which is unlike FCP is a part of Adobe Suite).
    However, since the OP asks for sharing ideas, I do not hesitate to do this once again. Here is the feature request intended to improve the usability of such PrPro assets as 'Sequences' without breaking existing workflow:
    *******Managing Sequences*******
    It would be nice if managing capabilities for such assets as 'Sequences' were extended with the following features:
    - similar live thumbnail view, which was introduced for footages in CS6. A small 'Sequence' badge in the top left corner of the thumbnail would allow to differentiate between sequences and clips;
    - enabled metadata and ability to handle them like for any other regular asset;
    - ability to remove empty audio or video tracks completely, i.e. get a sequence as an Audio or Video asset only;
    - pop-up dialog box on hitting 'Nest' command, which would allow to give meaning name instead of default 'Nested Sequence XXX', contain 'Delete All Empty Tracks' checkbox and a button for advanced dialog for logging metadata right on a brand new asset creation.
    These features would improve an ability to exploit sequences as reusable assets and preserve consistent applications behaviour throughout the Suite instead of breaking existing workflow by inventing new FCP style 'subclip with effects' type of asset. See this discussion in PrPro Forum for some more details:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1204107?tstart=0

  • Feature Request: Make a Setting Option for Export - Media - What to Render

    As I just changed after many years with Premiere Elements to Pro, I certainly find many things just anconversant.
    But there's one thing I really can't take: When I'm trying to render a project, there's a small selection list near the bottom of the "Export Media" window saying "export area". Here I can choose between "complete sequence", "work area", "sequence in/out" and "defined by user". This option jumps always back to "work area"!
    That's at least for me very unconveniant, because in 99+ % of my renderings, I need "complete sequence". Normally the software remembers the last used setting, but not in this case. I can imagine that one can fight about what's the best default setting: I Guess everyone is using Premiere differently. So in my opinion a predefined setting option would solve best for all: Just add one mor setting in the Presets section, maybe in "General" or make a new rubric "Export" or something. Just a place where everyone can predefine which setting for the export media area option he likes.
    No big deal, just one more presettings option!
    I hope I could make myself clear what I'm meaning
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Lutzz,
    When I'm trying to render a project, there's a small selection list near the bottom of the "Export Media" window saying "export area". Here I can choose between "complete sequence", "work area", "sequence in/out" and "defined by user". This option jumps always back to "work area"!
    That's at least for me very unconveniant, because in 99+ % of my renderings, I need "complete sequence".
    You can create a feature request here: http://adobe.ly/feature_request
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Feature request: make podcast "Keep" preferences specific to each podcast

    I subscribe to many different podcasts of different types for various reasons. With some podcasts I want to retain all episodes in an archive. With others I want to delete them as soon as I have listened to them. With others I might want to keep them for a week or month and then delete them even if I have not gotten around to listening to them. It would be very nice to be able to set a default preference for how long to keep podcasts in the iTunes preferences, just as can be done now, but to be able to override that default preference on a podcast by podcast basis. Please give us this ability to make podcast-specific decisions on how long to keep individual episodes. Thank you for considering this request.

    You can send feedback/feature requests directly to Apple at this link: Apple Product Feedback

  • FEATURE REQUEST: make swipe-down Notifications bar disable-able

    I use the iPad as a drawing tablet every day, using Brushes, ArtRage, and other drawing apps.
    It's wonderful and I am delighted to be able to do this . . . EXCEPT WHEN I DRAW A STROKE DOWN FROM THE TOP OF THE SCREEN.
    The introduction of the new pull-down Notifications drawer has led to loud cursing and a strong desire to break things, for me. When one is drawing, one is not in a state in which one wishes to glance at what the next day's schedule is at. Furthermore, the active area of the pull-down also 'catches' the drawing input, so the stroke which is misdirected into the Notification dialog is lost work, and subsequent rapid stokes, up to the threshold of my reaction time, also do not register.
    I must then dismiss the godforsaken irritating dialog in order to continue drawing. It is the most incredibly irritating interaction I have ever experienced on an Apple product.
    Please permit the dialog to be disabled either user-globally or on a per-app basis as a user-configurable setting.

    even with all notifications turned off the drawer remains active. there's no way to disable it.
    while this may be a user to user forum apple people do contribute.  I did file this as a feature request but wanted it to be visible and searchable.

  • Feature Request: Make RECENTS better with two more drill down options

    Hi everyone!
    I love my iPhone but - as with everything - one can make things get even better... Not sure where to post so I try here. Would love to hear if you feel the same need:
    I realize that RECENTS within the phone application could be improved quite a bit by adding two simple buttons at the top.
    Right now there is "ALL" and "MISSED"... being able to drill down the MISSED calls is great, but many times I would like to be able to drill down:
    * outgoing calls (aka those placed by me via iPhone)
    * incoming calls (aka those that I received on my iPhone)
    Would love to hear what others think about that. If we there will be many replies chances are good that Apple will fix this with a software update. It should be very little work on Apple's side.
    Greetings!

    I agree this feature would be most useful: most other phones incorporate it, and it would probably not be too difficult to add it to the iPhone? I expect most will agree with you, but this type of feedback should be sent directly to Apple:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

  • Feature Request: Make iBooks' dictionary accessible in Safari too

    Make it possible to tap a word on a Web page opened inside Safari and then select dictionary to lookup its meaning.

    This is a feature to implement in the future, please communicate that through the feedback channel:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html
    enjoy your magic machine

  • Feature request: make the "transform" dialogs non-modal

    Currently, the transformation dialogs accessible at Object>Transform are modal. I'm talking about "Move…", "Rotate…", "Reflect…", and so forth. These dialogs, when open, lock the user out of any interaction with the artboard other than the "preview" button, until the dialog is closed.
    Even more problematically, they lock the scroll and zoom factor of the current user view, so that there's no way to inspect how a precise numeric adjustment affects a part of the layout outside the current window (or within the current window but very small inside it) without committing the change, inspecting it, and then later undoing if necessary. This creates cycles of tedious user adjustments (especially on small monitors) that really should be possible in one user step, by toggling the preview button on and off, and zooming/scrolling.
    This is contrary to most modern UI design principles, which suggest avoiding modes unless they are truly and meaningfully necessary. I don't think this is one of those cases. Photoshop made dialogs for adjustment layers non-modal with CS4, and while there are issues with the newer interface (see John Nack's Configurator workaround), I think it's a win overall. Illustrator needs to catch up in this regard. I realize there is some pretty serious refactoring involved to do this, but it has to be do-able.
    In the words of Larry Tesler's immortal Subaru license plate: "NO MODES"!

    ...make the "transform" dialogs non-modal...
    What, and bring Illustrator out of the 1980s?! Are you mad, man?
    Just so you know you're not alone; I've been complaining about AI's archaic dependency upon modal dialogs for many years.
    ...I'm fully aware of the Transform panel...observing that there's another way to do it...doesn't really address any of my points here...
    But it's not "another way to do it," because the functionality is not the same. The modal dialogs include crucial functionality that cannot be done in the Transform palette. For example, moving something in terms of distance and direction (diagonally), instead of merely by lame X and Y factors. Or transforming about an off-object center of transformation, rather than merely by the 9-point proxy.
    ...the "preview" isn't updated on keyboard entry, and the "preview" checkbox need to be manually toggled on and off...
    But the preview does refresh (and does not have to be toggled) in response to keyboard entry if that keyboard entry is by the arrow keys. For example: Select something, doubleClick the Scale tool, click your cursor in the Uniform value field, and tap the up/down arrow keys (or press and hold them). The value will increment and the preview will update with each key tap. (Be sure to teach that to your students.)
    That does not, of course, negate the complaint, but it does ameleorate it somewhat. The increments are preset; there are no preference settings for them. (Don't even get me started on preferences that should be doc-specific settings, and vice-versa).
    Nor does the valid point that problematic dialogs abound beyond just those associated with the transform tools, but I do agree with it. For just one of many examples, it's nothing short of idiotic that the Scale fields of Transform Each do not have a uniform scaling lock, and that only percentage fields are provided and no explicit dimension fields. Illustrator is quite saturated with such inconsistencies and half-baked implementations.
    But...you're often arguing with the emotionally attached Illustrator devoted here. So I wouldn't recommend holding your breath. It would probably be more effective teaching Illustrator's shortcomings to your beginning students. Probably one of the easiest ways to explain the problem of modal dialogs is to point out that you can't change the current selection with the dialog open.
    JET

  • Feature Request - Make it run without crashing

    I have two windows computers running XP SP2. Bridge used to run fine on both and now will not keep running on either. It opens, sits there and will see pictures on my C drive, but the a few seconds after I select another internal drive, it crashes with the wonderful "Bridge has had to close" drop down.
    I have reset preferences until I am blue in the face but nothing ever changes. I don't know why this has gone on for at least a year and yet I see no fixes for it from adobe. I would be happy to be a guinie pig for any attempts to patch-correct this seemingly widespread problem.

    Check the RAW and normal cache directories for space allocated and space used. Make sure you have no more than 80% of the space filled up. Give it room to work freely.

  • Feature Request - Make Outgoing Message in Garage Band

    I want to be able to pre-record an outgoing message in Garage Band and then upload it to the phone to use as my custom outgoing message.
    That would be cool and sound good.

    That's probably information you should get from the manufacturer of your telephone.

  • Feature request: make enhancer more silent

    It would be nice if the enhancer only reported (or had an option to only
    report) the classes actually enhanced.
    Currently (as of 2.2.6) it displays:
    Enhancing "class x"...
    Type "x" is already PersistenceCapable; skipping.
    Cheers,
    Sebastien

    I second that.
    Paul
    Vauclair Sebastien wrote:
    It would be nice if the enhancer only reported (or had an option to only
    report) the classes actually enhanced.
    Currently (as of 2.2.6) it displays:
    Enhancing "class x"...
    Type "x" is already PersistenceCapable; skipping.
    Cheers,
    Sebastien

  • Feature Request: Make SDK-Min & SDK-Ver Available

    'Twould be awesome to be able to build common/shared/library code that can auto-detect the minimum and "maximum" SDK that a plugin is targeted for in order to adapt behavior or throw proper errors...
    Tnks,
    R

    Yeah.
    One of my favorite uses is for displaying Lr compatibility.
    I'm taking advantage of the fact that Lr does not care a whit what you set LrSdkVersion to, and using it to indicate maximum compatible version for display in info-provider. Thus, if my plugins don't say: "Compatible with Lr3", then even though they load, and may even run somewhat, you can be sure I have not tested and certified them for Lr3... (and vice versa...)
    Now that I think about it, adding "Mac support level" to the info.lua return table is not a bad idea - for display in info-provider.
    PS - I suppose we should be adding some of this knowlege to the new repository...
    Rob

  • Creative Cloud Feature Request: make it easier to edit credit card info

    It is painfully difficult to find the area where my credit card information can be changed.
    This is something that isn't done often so it's hard to remember what was done the last time.
    I would love to see it show up under My Adobe or My Information. This would be much
    easier for everyone... I just know it.
    Thank you for your consideration and for your wonderful products.

    Hi cagiali,
    Please refer the kb: http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/membership-subscription-troubleshooting- creative-cloud.html and contact our chat support in case of further issues.
    Regards,
    Romit Sinha

  • Where do I make a feature request for tethering and A2DP

    I would very much like to switch from Windows Mobile to an iPhone but:
    1. It does not support tethering which is very useful for emergency situations that require internet for work on my laptop while travelling
    2. It does not support A2DP which I think is a great innovation for music listening.
    I understand that feature requests cannot be made on this forum, so could somebody please tell me where I can officially voice these requests to Apple?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    scottymackie wrote:
    I would very much like to switch from Windows Mobile to an iPhone but:
    1. It does not support tethering which is very useful for emergency situations that require internet for work on my laptop while travelling
    In the US, it's unlikely that ATT will allow tethering without an additional tethering plan.
    2. It does not support A2DP which I think is a great innovation for music listening.
    There is an adapter you can buy if you want to use stereo bt headphones.

Maybe you are looking for