Text makes illu very slow

Using the text tool i created text blocks and pasted text, about 100 words and now when trying to type in there more text or make changes it takes for ever!
Im using a dual 1.8 G5, OSX 10.4.11, 3GB RAM. i think i should be encountering such issues, machine is fast enough at least for such simple tasks.
Can it be that illustrator cant handle such large texts? But then again whats the text chain feature for? Or might it be a problem regarding some illustrator setting?

OK Doug that's it we're taking this outside...I'll give you FreeHand alright!
Justy joking! I didn't frighten you did I?
If you had noticed from the past postings this is an issue I have had withthe Illustrator team and have constantly been reporting difficulties. Look how long it took toget the soft return to work and if one creates a text frame with columns you can not nacigate to the next column. The problems with Justified text as well.
The concept that there cannot be a shared type engine in all of the adobe applications is very strange.
You should be able to drag and drop paragraphs as point or area text from any of the apps with everything working as expected.
Any feature that cannot work in an application say as with Dreamweaver should eityher be grayewd out or offer a warning and instructions.
All settings on text should be shown in the applications effects panel and all apps should have live effects.
All text and paragraph styles should be live effects to be turned on and off at will.
No reason to ever permanently changew the default settings for text it should all be tool for repurposing your art and layout.
Even tabs.
This has to change. You can do it in Illustrator to some degree and though it is the weakest link it now has the foundation for really powerful text handling feature now that you can turn on and off effects in the appearance panel.
There is no reason any more that the paragraph character styles panels be used once a style is applied. The effects panel should take care of that task with a wink of an eye.
If you want to transform text use the effects and not the transform tool it has to go.
And everyone has to put the screws to Adobe on this. When I get back I will put in anopther more comrehensive feature request I encourage everyone to do so especially Gary and James who Adobe are more likely to listen to then perhaps me!
It would be great if we actually get5 them to change this next time out.

Similar Messages

Pages with many text hyperlinks are very slow

When making a text list, where a lot of the words are hperlinks, the resulting age is very slow with loading.
Also, especially when not using Safari, the screen is garbled with text until the complete page is loaded.
It looks like all those simple text hyperlinks are somehow displayed as pictures???
How can I create plain text hyperlinks without all the overhead added by iWeb?

I have converted a list to web => Times New Roman => bolt and regular, but still the same problem.
In the source code this list is build by using img usemap, see part of the code here:
test1
test2
....cut
The solution looks like to recreate all the lists
I will post the result when I have recreated one of the lists.

Turning photostream on makes Iphoto very slow and unresponsive.

When i enable Photostream either through the settings or directly from Iphoto it causes Iphoto to become very slow and unresponsive.
When i click on an album to view it takes around 60 seconds for the album to open, when it finally opens all the thumbnails are blurry and scrolling through the album is virtually impossibe.
If i then turn of Photostream everything is fine.
Im using a late 2011 Air with 4gb memory and i have around 132gb of free space on the drive.

jaceylucifer,
I just sorted an issue I had. When checking the photsteam box in iPhot preferences it unchecked straight away.
Method 1 on this link sorted me out in 2 mins. I have advised the senior apple care guy that was trying to sort this out for me. http://helpdeskgeek.com/help-desk/photostream-keeps-turning-off-in-iphoto-fix-it /
Hope it helps.
Ben

SQL 2008 Full Text CONTAINSTABLE is VERY SLOW

Hello,
I am running SQL Server 2008 SP3.
I know I am not the only to have SQL Server CONTAINSTABLE query performances issues. However I think mine is very strange because it appears that the SAME IDENTICAL query produces completely different execution plans on two different sessions against
the same SQL Server/database.
This is the query:
select * from CONTAINSTABLE (TABChiamate,[Domanda],N'"dn"', 20)
My full text index has been completely rebuilt and it contains 1 million of rows.
What is strange about this query is that on the session where it works fine it runs in a fraction of a second, whereas on another session it's REALLY slow - taking 20/30 seconds to run (or minutes, depending on the top_n parameter).
Looking at the execution plans I see that the slow one is doing a TABLE/LAZY SPOOL on 741.000 rows, which making both CPUs of the server spin to 100% for the execution time (20/30 seconds). Obviously this is unacceptable since we have about one hundred of
users that could perform the same query in the same minute and I can't have 100 cores to complete the operation right?
However, I am not able to understand why this issue is strictly related to the Session... new sessions are running fine...
Anyone could help trying to figure out what to look for to explain this strange behavior? I tried to see all SET options to understand if they are different ... now my question is ... is it possible that execution plans are cached in a per-session basis?
Thank you in advance!
Adriano

Hi RFL, thank you for your reply! I try to answer your questions below.
Adriano, A few comments and questions.
1. What build level of SQL Server 2008 are you running?
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP3) - 10.0.5500.0 (X64) Sep 21 2011 22:45:45 Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (VM)
2. Your example query is apparently not identical to the two plans in the screen shots. Could you share two runs of the restricted query?
I just retried the same today and it appears to work correctly... however the main issue is that I am sure I'll face the issue in the next weeks as soon as the full text index will need a rebuild ... :-(
3. How many rows do the unlimited searches return?
127 rows.
4. Is the first query in the set always the slow one? Or, if you switch them around does slow query remain the same?
If you look at the execution plans above, the executed query is the same on 2 connections. I copied/pasted the same query, and on the first query window it was REALLY slow, putting both CPUs at 98% for many seconds/near a minute.
There was a bug reported here with optimization, SQL Server 2008, and Containstable. I cannot tell if the problem is identical to yours, but if you have not updated SQL Server 2008 since mid-2009 you might check for the fix to the following problem:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/003bb682-a7d2-489d-ad0f-123a8206b663/fulltext-search-containstable-near-broken-in-sql-server-2008?forum=transactsql
I've seen, but it seems not my case (I've SP3 and still having issues).
This morning I've seen that the query analyzer window got the connection broken, and I needed to reconnect. After reconnecting the same query window, the query went fast... but I am not able to understand WHY, it looks like the "bad plan"
was cached on the actual connection/process for some reason, and after a timeout it has been recalculated on the rebuilt full-text index... and actually now it works... but I am sure the issue will come back again in some days/week...
RLF
Adriano

When opening files in excel 2013, it is showing contacting.... makes it very slow

When I open a file in excel 2013 , it is shown that the file is contacting so many files (ONE EXAMPLE IS ATTACHED HEREWITH) that it takes nearly 2-3 minutes to open.But the same file is opened in Excel 2010 immediately.
However this file doesn't have any links or references or formulae and the files which are being contacted, I think, have nothing to do with this file.
How to solve this problem? We have around 1000 PCs of Windows 7 in our organization and this makes the users very annoying. Please help me...

For the questions you raised the answers are,
1. No, the excel files which excel 2013 is contacting are not in the same folder.
2 . both, local workbook and received through mail.
3. before I tell the outcome of your suggestion, I have attached the few lines which I got fromone of the users.
The following are the problem experienced in Newly Installed Office 2013 Excel Software
While opening file containing links to external link, relatively longer time (approx. 2-3 min) is taken for opening the file.
Even if the links to external sources are
delinked, all the references are being contacted while opening the file. This is also taking the same time like the old file.
When more than two excel files are opened, only last file is available in the tab. Rest of the files are hidden in the minimized tab.
As per the user, he has linked some files to this excel file(problematic file). But even after the links are removed and the problematic file is opened it is still contacting the old linked files.
Please suggest something.
Balamurugan Sakthivel.

Sync mount option makes writing *very* slow

I noticed today one of my external HDDs was writing at 1MB/s, and another at 2MB/s, but both were reading just fine. I've just tracked down the problem. I have been mounting USB HDDs with the sync option, so sudden power loss / disconnection / whatever doesn't cause data loss, however, it had quite an effect on speed. Removing the sync mount option boosted write speed up to 47MB/s.
Is this known/expected/normal behaviour? I'm using 2.6.33.2-1 from testing.

I think that my expectation of how fast I should be able to move files from client to server was wrong.
This post on superuser is about the same complaint (transfers within LAN slower than downloading):
http://superuser.com/questions/528386/l … -downloads
If anyone can confirm that this is normal behavior, I'd be grateful.
This is my setup:
cable modem ---> router -----[wireless connection] ---->client
|
|
-------------{wired connection]------->server
Downloading from internet to the client over wireless is about 1 MB/s. Moving files from client to server is about 500kb/s.

Live Text Template - Very slow to update

Started using Live Text Templates which in theory seem really great but they are SOOOOO slow to update.
So I create a simple 5 sec title with two text elements which simply fade in at the start and fade out at the end. The back ground is plain colored shape.
I put this in to premiere, open it in the source panel and update my two text elements
I put this title into an empty timeline - if I move the play head over the clips in the timeline it can take up to 60 seconds before the clip shows the correct text
I then change the text in the master clip (title).
Going back to the time line it takes about 1-2 minutes before I can view the changes in the timeline - either by just putting the playhead over the clip or actually playing the timeline. It will either show a black frame or the previous text.
If the sequence contains other content then after changing text in the master clip the whole timeline will just show a black frame in the program panel for about 30-60 seconds then I can view this other content but have to wait a further 30-60 seconds before I see the updated title text.
Its very slow and far from live. Anyone know if there is something I can change somewhere to speed this up? What is happening behind the scenes to allow Premiere to effectively render out this titles? If I actually render the title in the timeline it only take a few seconds so no reason it should take so long for Premiere to do it in the background.

Good question that I ask myself also, but not just updating Titles. Same time lag for updating a Photoshop image that sits inside Premiere, or updating an After Effects composition inside Premiere.
Sometimes I think I can 'trick it' into speeding up by 'saving' the Premiere project, but then most times I think I am tricking myself.

Very Slow Query due to Bitmap Conversion

I have a strange problem with the performance of a spatial query. If I perform a 'SELECT non_geom_column FROM my_table WHERE complicated_join_query' the result comes back sub-second. However, when I replace the column selected with geometry and perform 'SELECT geom_column FROM my_table WHERE same_complicated_join_query' the response takes over a minute.
The issue is that in the second case, despite the identical where clause, the explain plan is significantly different. In the 'select geom_column' query there is a BITMAP CONVERSION (TO ROWIDS) which accounts for all of the extra time, where as in the 'select other_column' query that conversion is replaced with TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) which is near instant.
I have tried putting in some hints, although I do not have much experience with hints, and have also tried nesting the query in various sub-selects. Whatever I try I can not persuade the explain plan to drop the bitmap conversion when I select the geometry column. The full query and an explanation of that query are below. I have run out of things to try, so any help or suggestions at all would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Chris
Explanation and query
My application allows users to select geometries from a map image through clicking, dragging a box and various other means. The image is then refreshed - highlighting geometries based on the query with which I am having trouble. The user is then able to deselect any of those highlighted geometries, or append others with additional clicks or dragged selections.
If there are 2 (or any even number of) clicks within the same geometry then that geometry is deselected. Alternatively the geometry could have been selected through an intersection with a dragged box, and then clicked in to deselect - again an even number of selections. Any odd number of selections (i.e. selecting, deselecting, then selecting again) would result in the geometry being selected.
The application can not know if the multiple user clicks are in the same geometry, as it simply has an image to work with, so all it does is pass all the clicks so far to the database to deal with.
My query therefore does each spatial point or rectangle query in turn and then appends the unique key for the rows each returned to a list. After performing all of the queries it groups the list by the key and the groups with an odd total are 'selected'. To do this logic in a single where clause I have ended up with nested select statements that are joined with union all commands.
The query is therefore..
SELECT
--the below column (geometry) makes it very slow...replacing it with any non-spatial column takes less than 1/100 of the time - that is my problem!
geometry
FROM
my_table
WHERE
primary_key IN
SELECT primary_key FROM
SELECT primary_key FROM my_table WHERE
sdo_relate(geometry, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, 81989, NULL, sdo_elem_info_array(1, 1003, 3), sdo_ordinate_array( rectangle co-ords )), 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE'
UNION ALL SELECT primary_key FROM my_table WHERE
sdo_relate(geometry, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2001, 81989, sdo_point_type( point co-ords , NULL), NULL, NULL), 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE'
--potentially more 'union all select...' here
GROUP BY primary_key HAVING mod(count(*),2) = 1
AND
--the below is the bounding rectangle of the whole image to be returned
sdo_filter(geometry, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, 81989, NULL, sdo_elem_info_array(1, 1003, 3), sdo_ordinate_array( outer rectangle co-ords )), 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE'

Hi
Thanks for the reply. After a lot more googling- it turns out this is a general Oracle problem and is not solely related to use of the GEOMETRY column. It seems that sometimes, the Oracle optimiser makes an arbitrary decision to do bitmap conversion. No amount of hints will get it to change its mind !
One person reported a similarly negative change after table statistic collection had run.
Why changing the columns being retrieved should change the execution path, I do not know.
We have a numeric primary key which is always set to a positive value. When I added "AND primary_key_column > 0" (a pretty pointless clause) the optimiser changed the way it works and we got it working fast again.
Chris

Database is very slow due to materialized view

hi guys,
our database is having materialized view which is getting refreshed every hour makes DB very slow,moreover it is generating very huge quantity of archives in a single day.
is there any way to get rid off from this worse situation
pls help me out...

Hi,
I'm sure the below link will help you:
http://www.orafaq.com/node/1897
Best regards,
Rafi.
http://rafioracledba.blogspot.com/

Since updating my io7 system my text speed is so slow what can be done to fix it?

Can anyone help my texting speed is very slow about a 6 second delay it drive me crazy anything I can change to fix this appreciated.

https://discussions.apple.com/message/23348976?ac_cid=sa123456#23348976

AE CS4 on OSX 10.5 Very Slow, Makes System Unresponsive

This is very frustrating, our company has been fighting this problem since we upgraded. I work for a major broadcaster which uses AE for all our motion graphics work. Since upgrading to CS4 we've experienced a team wide decrease in productivity. AE CS4 renders slower than CS3 and in some cases will completely lock up the computer when rendering, making it impossible to do any sort of simple multitasking. Even switching to the Finder and moving around windows is very slow. Let alone try to use Safari or type into a TextEdit document. We've tried everything, but details first.
We're running on last-gen 8-core 3.2GHz Mac Pro's. Each has 10GB of ram and 1TB of HD space (mostly empty). NVidia GeForce 8800 GT video card. Runing AE 9.0.2.42)
We realize that 10GB is not enough ram to use all 8 processors at full speed. So AE is set to use multiprocessing with a max of 3 cores with 2GB minimum with 2 GB in reserve for other applications. All the work we do is with HD footage. All footage is delivered in Apple Prores. Any comp of medium or greater complexity will completely slow down the system. When comparing CS3 rendering time to CS4, CS4 seems about 30-40% slower. When rendering CS4 will also completely lock up the system, switching windows is a complete pain. We've tried turing on and off OpenGL in AE, but no change. We're tried every combination of settings we can think of. Rendering without multiprocessing is even slower and still locks up the system. Also in Activity Monitor is will often show only limited CPU useage (see attached screen). You can see I'm running multiple aeselflink instances, but each one is no where near 100 and the system is still unresponsive!
Outside of rendering CS4 also is much more unresponsive when just working (not rendering). Moving clips around in the composition window and navigating the timeline are sometimes a chore, with lots of 1-2 second delays before taking the action. Or slow screen updates.
Any ideas what is happening here? If is something with the change from 32-bit to 64-bit. Will more ram fix it or is there something else going on? This is becoming a very frustrating situations where we have to completely restart the computer and make sure no other apps are running before even trying to render our anything. CS3 did not seem to have these problems, even with multiprocessing turned on at it's default settings. We like many of the new features in CS4 and are practically required to use it because we get a lot of projects from vendors, but it's proving very slow to work in.

I don't know how complex your comps are, but our are usually pretty complex. Simple comps with just text and 1-2 layers of video usually go pretty quick, but as soon as you ramp up complexity it slows way down. I somehow don't think that our graphics card is the problem. Most of the plugins we use do not see any benefit from OpenGL and we don't use that many 3D layers. In general we haven't seen a big boost in AE performance with OpenGL on or off. All our footage sits on a super fast Terrablock system with at least 300-400mb/s sequential read speeds. Then again it could be that AE just runs poorly on Macs.
Adolfo - we have done some quite extensive benchmarks with all our machines here. Configuring both 10GB and 16GB versions (we have not tried higher memory yet). We tested the same comp in both CS3 and CS$ with various multiprocessor settings. Our test file's complexity was indicative of the kind of projects we do. Around 30 layers, a mix of TGA sequences with alpha, QuickTimes with alpha (animation) and ProRes footage. Many layers with ReelSmart Motion Blur. A Knoll Light Factory lens flare. A mix of layers with various blurs and color correction and some transfer modes.
As you can see CS3 was much, much quicker at rendering the project. In some cases almost twice as fast as CS4. Also, strangely CS3 ran better limited to 4 processors in both the 10GB and 16GB configurations.
Benchmark Test File
CS3 Benchmarks
[note - CS3 has no options in the app for adjusting multi-processor settings. All edits had to be made in the pref file.]
10GB System -----------------
AE CS3
10GB
4 Processors
12m 43s
[note - This was the most optimized setting for CS3 which gave the best performance for us.]
AE CS3
10BG
8 Processors
24m 8s
[note - Default setting in AE CS3 for multiprocessor. System is completely unusable during render.]
16GB System -----------------
AE CS3
16GB
4 Processors
11m 54s
[note - This was the optimized setting for CS3 which gave the best performance. Each instance of the program was using 150-180 CPU in the activity monitor so it must be using more that 4 processors with this setting. Each processor used more memory than in the 10GB config.]
AE CS3
16GB
7 Processors
16m 15s
AE CS3
16BG
8 Processors
20m 13s
[note - Default setting in AE CS3 for multiprocessor. System is completely unusable during render.]
CS4 Benchmarks
In general CS4 is about half the speed of an optimized CS3. Going from 10GB to 16GB of memory gained us about 33% performance increase in the most optimized setting (4-6 processors at 2GB+ per processor).
10GB System -----------------
AE CS4
10GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
3 Processors (2GB per processor)
24m 7s
[note - Computer response pretty slow]
AE CS4
10GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (.9GB per processor)
28m 10s
[note - Computer completely unusable while rendering]
16GB System -----------------
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
8GB reserved for AE (8GB reserved for OS)
3 Processors (2GB per processor)
22m 57s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
4 Processors (2.33+ GB per processor)
18m 7s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
6 Processors (2.09 GB/Processor)
19m 1s
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
14GB reserved for AE (2GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (1.85GB/Processor)
23m 4s
[note - This config made system very slow, left very little memory for the system.]
AE CS4
16GB total RAM
13GB reserved for AE (3GB reserved for OS)
7 Processors (1.59GB/Processor)
25m 50s

Export to text file very, very slow

Hi, I am running 2.1.0.63 and doing an export of a query to a text file. The export was 66000 rows, but took incredibly almost around 2 hours to finish. The row counter in the status bar was very slow. The same exact query/export under 1.5.4 ran in about 5 mins. The row counter on both the fetching and exporting was just flying by.
Has anybody else experienced this ? What could be causing it to run that slow under this release ?
The other issue I have is once there has been no activity for a while, sqldeveloper hangs has to be restarted. I saw this being addressed in another post however, and will follow it there.
Any ideas on when a patch will be made available to this release ?
BTW, I really like some of the other new features of this release.
Thanks,
Mark

Ok, I think the issue was that I was exporting to a shared network drive. I redid it, saving it locally and it worked fine.
I still have the issue of inactivity and having to restart sqldeveloper.
Thanks.

Hi all.When pressed play and make some changes in loop (eg fade in fade out) are very slow to implement, and also the loops from the library are very slow to play, corrects the somewhat self so is the Logic??

hi all.When pressed play and make some changes in loop (eg fade in fade out) are very slow to implement, and also the loops from the library are very slow to play, corrects the somewhat self so is the Logic??

Hey there Logic Pro21,
It sounds like you are seeing some odd performance issues with Logic Pro X. I recommend these troubleshooting steps specifically from the following article to help troubleshoot what is happening:
Logic Pro X: Troubleshooting basics
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5859
Verify that your computer meets the system requirements for Logic Pro X
See Logic Pro X Technical Specifications.
Test using the computer's built-in audio hardware
If you use external audio hardware, try setting Logic Pro X to use the built-in audio hardware on your computer. Choose Logic Pro X > Preferences > Audio from the main menu and click the Devices tab. Choose the built in audio hardware from the Input Device and Output Device pop-up menus. If the issue is resolved using built-in audio, refer to the manufacturer of your audio interface.
Start Logic with a different project template
Sometimes project files can become damaged, causing unexpected behavior in Logic. If you use a template, damage to the template can cause unexpected results with any project subsequently created from it. To create a completely fresh project choose File > New from Template and select Empty Project in the template selector window. Test to see if the issue is resolved in the new project.
Sometimes, issues with the data in a project can be repaired. Open an affected project and open the Project Information window with the Project Information key command. Click Reorganize Memory to attempt to repair the project. When you reorganize memory, the current project is checked for any signs of damage, structural problems, and unused blocks. If any unused blocks are found, you will be able to remove these, and repair the project. Project memory is also reorganized automatically after saving or opening a project.
Delete the user preferences
You can resolve many issues by restoring Logic Pro X back to its original settings. This will not impact your media files. To reset your Logic Pro X user preference settings to their original state, do the following:
In the Finder, choose Go to Folder from the Go menu.
Type ~/Library/Preferences in the "Go to the folder" field.
Press the Go button.
Remove the com.apple.logic10.plist file from the Preferences folder. Note that if you have programmed any custom key commands, this will reset them to the defaults. You may wish to export your custom key command as a preset before performing this step. See the Logic Pro X User Manual for details on how to do this. If you are having trouble with a control surface in Logic Pro X, then you may also wish to delete the com.apple.logic.pro.cs file from the preferences folder.
If you have upgraded from an earlier version of Logic Pro, you should also remove~/Library/Preferences/Logic/com.apple.logic.pro.
Restart the computer.
Isolate an issue by using another user account
For more information see Isolating an issue by using another user account.
Reinstall Logic Pro X
Another approach you might consider is reinstalling Logic Pro X. To do this effectively, you need to remove the application, then reinstall Logic Pro X. You don't have to remove everything that was installed with Logic Pro X. Follow the steps below to completely reinstall a fresh copy of Logic Pro X.
In the Finder, choose Applications from the Go menu.
Locate the Logic Pro X application and drag it to the trash.
Open the Mac App Store
Click the Purchases button in the Mac App Store toolbar.
Sign in to the Mac App Store using the Apple ID you first used to purchase Logic Pro X.
Look for Logic Pro X in the list of purchased applications in the App Store. If you don't see Logic Pro X in the list, make sure it's not hidden. See Mac App Store: Hiding and unhiding purchases for more information.
Click Install to download and install Logic Pro X.
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
Sterling

The problem is with the new operating system and sending photo via email when used in my iPad. From photo I selected 3 photos to send via email. I choose the upload key and choose to send by email. Typing text on the email is very slow.

The problem is with the new operating system and sending photo via email when used in my iPad.
From photo I selected 3 photos to send via email. I choose the upload key and choose to send by email. Typing text on the email is very slow. This is solved by saving the email as a draft and opening the email again from mail.
Can you amend he system to allow emails to be sent from photo as previously.

Have you tried restarting or resetting your iPad?
Restart: Press On/Off button until the Slide to Power Off slider appears, select Slide to Power Off and, after the iPad shuts down, then press the On/Off button until the Apple logo appears.
Reset: Press the Home and On/Off buttons at the same time and hold them until the Apple logo appears (about 10 seconds). Ignore the "Slide to power off"

Lion is very slow. I have problem to make copy of a file. How can I make a check to see what is wrong?

Lion is very slow. The big problem now is when I need to make a copy of a file in an external HD. A file about 7 Gigas can take 4 hours!!!
Using Aperture I try to save a library in an external HD (another) with function "export project as a library" an takes hours for something around 1 giga.
Since I have Lion I can not use Time Machine. I have a Western Digital 2 Teras in raid 1. 1 tera for copy and 1 tera as an image. It's been impossible. I had to format the HD and when I try to start using Time machine my 600 gigas of data becomes in 7 days!!. 7 days !! for a backup. An usually after several hours (sometimes 20hrs, sometimes 1 day and a half) the process stoped abrudtly... and that's it. star again.
How can I check or perform a exploration to see what is happening?
thanks in advance
RyJ

Is a Western Digital Studio Edition II 2T (in RAID 1 mirror). The HD has 2 drives 1T each an put one mirroring the second one.
HD is connected to Mac through Firewire 800.

Text makes illu very slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for