The cost to call Mexico

I want to know how much does it cost to add international service to call Mexico and how much is it per minute without a plan?

Hi
I’d be happy to help with call costs to Mexico! The Pay-Per-Use rate for calls to Mexico with no International plan is $0.65/min to wireless numbers, or $0.49/min to wireline numbers.
With AT&T World Connect Value, your receive UNLIMITED calling to Mexico, 1¢ per minute calls to Canada, and discounted calling rates to over 225 countries, all for just $5/month. For more information, click here.
I hope this helps!
Charise

Similar Messages

The cost of calling 0844 numbers

I thought that I could ring 0844 for free in my unlimited package periuod.
This is not true.
On ringing BT customer services a man in the Phillipines told me that the cost of ringing any 0844 number is a 15p connection charge and then 2.04p per minute.
This is not true
The cost can be at a whole load of different rates depending on the rest of the 0844 number. I am told that these rates may be 1p 3p 5p 7p etc but I am not sure about this.
Can anyone please help me (and BT) to understand these rates better?

The information on the cost of 0844 numbers is available, but BT really don't make it easy to find out how much a call will cost.
My method is this:
1. Look up the "Charge Rate" for the number in this list: http://www.bt.com/pricing/current/Call_Charges_boo/1632_d0e5.htm#1632-d0e5
2. Look up the price per minute for the charge rate here: http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/consumer/assets/downloads/BT_PhoneTariff_SpecialNos.pdf

Cost of calling local # in foreign country

What is the cost of calling a local number when I am in a foreign country? Is it just the same roaming charge I would pay to call a US number from that country? That's what a Verizon representative told me but it doesn't sound right.
If I am in London, for example, and I have the Global Value Plan will I pay $.99/minute to call a London number or a US number?

nycityny,
We do not want you to have any surprise charges on your bill. Lets make sure you are able to see exactly what the rates for calling a number in the use while international. The rate for making a call while in London whether calling an international number or dialing a number from the U.S. the rate is $0.99 per minutes with the Global Value Plan. Check out all the details here... http://vz.to/1jOzh5I
LindseyT_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Cost of Calls Within USA

How much per minute does a call to a landline within the USA cost?
From my Windows laptop?
From my iPad?
Thanks, cb
Solved!
Go to Solution.

abredt wrote:
How much per minute does a call to a landline within the USA cost?
Hello and welcome to the Skype Community.
With Skype your location is irrelevant. The cost of calling the USA from anywhere in the world [including from within the USA] is 2.3 cents per minute. The cost is the same to call landlines or cellphones and from any device.
TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

My Mum( a pensioner) is wanting to purchase both an iPhone and iPad. What is the best way for her to manage her data /calls/txt etc. obviously the cost needs to be as low as possible. Currently does not have WiFi but uses dongle

My Mum( a pensioner) is wanting to purchase both an iPhone and iPad. What is the best way for her to manage her data /calls/txt etc. obviously the cost needs to be as low as possible. Currently does not have WiFi but uses dongle

My Mum( a pensioner) is wanting to purchase both an iPhone and iPad. What is the best way for her to manage her data /calls/txt etc. obviously the cost needs to be as low as possible. Currently does not have WiFi but uses dongle

What is the cost of Unlimited World plan?

Hello,
What is the cost and restrictions of the Unlimited World Plan?
I looked in the PRICES details on Skype website and didn't see the actual cost, just the offer for 1 free month.
Thank you,
Lucio Gayosso

LGAYOSSO wrote:
What is the cost and restrictions of the Unlimited World Plan?
Hello and welcome to the Skype Community.
The Unlimited World Subscription costs $13.99 per month.
With your Unlimited World Subscription you can:
Call LANDLINES AND CELLPHONES in: Canada, China, Guam, Hong Kong, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Thailand, United States.
Call LANDLINES ONLY in: Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guadeloupe, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia (Jakarta), Ireland, Republic of Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, Venezuela.
Restrictions are in this document:
http://www.skype.com/en/legal/fair-usage/
TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

The plan doesn't use the index but the cost of INDEX FULL SCAN looks better

Hi,
Well, I'm sure I miss the boat... and if the question is pretty tricky, the answer is probably :"You're stupid Greg!". Well anyway, you'll probably be interested in trying to answer it as I've spent some times on it without any result ! I use Oracle XE on Windows...
1) Below is my query and its plan. You'll find the full schema generation script at the end of this email. Look at the cost (468) of the plan and the cost of the same query when you force the use of the index (116). Why is this ?
select count(distinct col5)
2    from demo
3      where col1 between 1 and 50000
4        and col2=col1
5        and col3=col1
6        and col4=col1;
Plan d'execution
Plan hash value: 2072716547
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |   116 |   468   (2)| 00:00:06 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY     |      |     1 |   116 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEMO |     1 |   116 |   468   (2)| 00:00:06 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=50000 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)2) When I force the use of an index (with a Hint), You'll see the cost of the plan is 116 which is definitly better than the TABLE ACCESS FULL (468) :
SQL> l
1 select /*+ index(demo demo_idx)*/ count(distinct col5)
2    from demo
3      where col1 between 1 and 50000
4        and col2=col1
5        and col3=col1
6*       and col4=col1
SQL> /
Plan d'execution
Plan hash value: 189561699
| Id | Operation                    | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |          |     1 |   116 |   437   (2)| 00:00:06 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY               |          |     1 |   116 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEMO     |     1 |   116 |   437   (2)| 00:00:06 |
|* 3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | DEMO_IDX |     1 |       |   436   (2)| 00:00:06 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=50000 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)3) My question is why is plan1 used while plan2 should be considered better by the optimizer regarding the cost (to make the case even more complex, plan1 is actually more efficient but this is out of the scope of my question. I know that and I know why !).
You'll find a script to generate the structures and data below. I can send you the 10053 traces if you what to go furthermore. Take care the index is a REVERSE index (Don't know if query rewrite should be enabled in order to take advantage of this type of index but it is set to "true" (and "trusted") :
drop table demo;
create table demo (col1 number not null,
    col2 number,
    col3 number,
    col4 number,
    col5 varchar2(500));
begin
for i in 1..100000 loop
    insert into demo values (i,i,i,i,'This column is used to raise the High Water Mark and '||
                             ' the cost of an TABLE ACCESS FULL operation');
end loop;
end;
commit;
create index demo_idx on demo(col1,col2,col3,col4) reverse;
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER, 'DEMO', cascade=>true, -
method_opt=>'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 254', no_invalidate=>false) Any comments are welcome ! Best Regards,
Gregory
Message was edited by:
arkzoyd... I've added the "pre" tags

I suspect this has something to do with db_file_multiblock_read_count
After running provided creation statements by you I got following results:
SQL> show parameter multiblock
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select count(distinct col5)
2   from demo
3   where col1 between 1 and 50000
4   and col2=col1
5   and col3=col1
6   and col4=col1
7 /
COUNT(DISTINCTCOL5)
                  1
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2072716547
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |   116 |   375   (1)| 00:00:05 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY     |      |     1 |   116 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEMO |     1 |   116 |   375   (1)| 00:00:05 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=5000
0 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)
Statistics
        196 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       1734 consistent gets
        850 physical reads
          0 redo size
        422 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          7 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processed
SQL> select /*+ index(demo demo_idx)*/ count(distinct col5)
2   from demo
3   where col1 between 1 and 50000
4   and col2=col1
5   and col3=col1
6   and col4=col1
7 /
COUNT(DISTINCTCOL5)
                  1
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 189561699
| Id | Operation                    | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| T
ime     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |          |     1 |   116 |   431   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY               |          |     1 |   116 |            |
        |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEMO     |     1 |   116 |   431   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
|* 3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | DEMO_IDX |     1 |       |   430   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=5000
0 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
      50426 consistent gets
        428 physical reads
          0 redo size
        422 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedNow I modify multiblock_read_count and full scan cost is going up although anyway Oracle by default chooses full scan instead of index access.
SQL> alter session set db_file_multiblock_read_count = 8;
Session altered.
SQL> select count(distinct col5)
2   from demo
3   where col1 between 1 and 50000
4   and col2=col1
5   and col3=col1
6   and col4=col1
7 /
COUNT(DISTINCTCOL5)
                  1
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2072716547
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |   116 |   463   (1)| 00:00:06 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY     |      |     1 |   116 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEMO |     1 |   116 |   463   (1)| 00:00:06 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=5000
0 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       1697 consistent gets
        850 physical reads
          0 redo size
        422 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processed
SQL> select /*+ index(demo demo_idx)*/ count(distinct col5)
2   from demo
3   where col1 between 1 and 50000
4   and col2=col1
5   and col3=col1
6   and col4=col1
7 /
COUNT(DISTINCTCOL5)
                  1
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 189561699
| Id | Operation                    | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| T
ime     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |          |     1 |   116 |   431   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY               |          |     1 |   116 |            |
        |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEMO     |     1 |   116 |   431   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
|* 3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | DEMO_IDX |     1 |       |   430   (1)| 0
0:00:06 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter("COL2"="COL1" AND "COL3"="COL1" AND "COL4"="COL1" AND
              "COL1"<=50000 AND "COL2"<=50000 AND "COL3"<=50000 AND "COL4"<=5000
0 AND
              "COL1">=1 AND "COL2">=1 AND "COL3">=1 AND "COL4">=1)
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
      50426 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        422 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedSo I don't know what is the default value of dbfmbrc in XE and not gone too deep to understand how for example system statistics may change your situation.
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
P.S. BTW I used Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0.
Message was edited by:
gintsp
listened to Williams suggestion :)

Where can I get some feet for my 15" Macbook Pro (mid 2009) without the cost of A$200

I am loosing my mind. Can anuone please help?
I have a 15" mid 2009 Macbook Pro, that I love. It is my 6th Apple computer so it's not like I haven't contributed to the Apple estate.
I use it for work and study so it pretty much runns continuously and has since its purchase in 2009. So, as you can imagine wear and tear are starting to show.
3 of the 4 feet have come off and this is making me crazy. It does not ventilate properly and doesn't sit well on the desk. I have attempted to buy all manner of feet to fit it, but nothing works.
So, I took it to my local Apple store a while ago in search of some replacement feet for it. Because, Apple have to inspect all repair jobs.
I cannot buy, the feet alone, I must buy the complete bottom housing for it at the cost of A$199.00 (WHAT!!!, I HEAR YOU SAY!!!, and that is pretty much exactly what I said when I was told this by my apple genius (and yes, I did say Genius with a sarcastic tone), but certainly the thoughts that ran through my mind were far stronger).
So, in my eternal search to make my perfectly working but incredibly annoying, beloved macbook pro be as good as ever, I have been to 2 "apple" dealers in the hope to buy this product at a cheaper price. Because, 1. I don't want the base, only the feet and 2. I don't want to pay 200 bucks for it.
Anyway. the first purchase I made was through some dodgy chinese website. Apparently, there is no one at the other end, because all corespondense was ignored. But I did get my money back.
But the second has really done my head in. www.applecomponents.com had advertised the part at $US69. So, I purchased and paid with paypal and all was well with the world. But, This morning I recieved the following email. And this is the entirity of the message from a business with obviously no customer service skill, not address, no phone number. Just a rude individual at the end of the email.
Remember, this was the whole email...
"so it's looking like this part was in the wrong bin. we don't actually have one. we can get new, but it would cost around $150.
please advise?"
***? (and I am really holding back bolding that text and setting the font size to 68).
In Australia, if a product is advertised at a price, that is what we pay for it.
So, I re-check the website and the price has increase $100 but, it still says "in stock".
Right about now, I am starting to get quite frustrated, with this faceless nameless person/company/shonk.
I get in touch with some consumer experts and reply and I recieve the following reponse...
"it was an honest mistake. we have a lot parts. we haven't sold one of these bottom cases for over 6 months. whoever labeled em' did it wrong. I don't have the part, but I have access to ordering it new with my vendor - hence the price change.
feel free to call me anytime and we can talk it out.
thanks
phillip
503-806-6423"
(not really sure where this phone number resides so the 10 digits are useless)
Now, Phillip is not the person I made the payment to. The payment was made to Alex Kraft.
Who, After I demanded the product. Has just refunded my money and dissapeard off the planet.
I am sick and tired of these shonks and it is now my mission to stop these people from trading.
Sorry for my digression but, I feel, all should be aware of these people. Scammers.
But, if anyone knows where I can get some feet from someone who will bloddy supply them at a price that is reasonable.
Please let me know.
Thanks

your situation is not new. Others have been told by Apple that they have to purchase the entire bottom panel in order to replace the feet. There are engineering solutions that can solve this problem, but to pay nearly $200 to replace a part that costs less than $1 (I am being very, very conservative) to manufacture is too excessive.
I have had the feet come off as well. Fortunately for me, I have not lost them and have been able to replace them. Why they cannot sell them individually is a puzzle to me. Perhaps some bean counter at Apple feels its too much effort to have these items individually in their inventory. I have had nothing but good comments to say about Apple, but sadly this is an exception.
To address your problem, I have seen second hand ones advertised on Ebay. The price was a bit steep, $10 as I remember. Other wise, wjosten's suggestion is the only alternative.
Ciao

Did I make a mistake upgrading to ML? Count the costs!

Talk about your string of circumstances. All I really needed was to eliminate hum from the soundtrack of an oral-history video recording. The simplest solution seemed to be to update iMovie. I was using '09, which has virtually no capability to edit audio.
Well, when I tried to download iMovie '11 I learned that it would not work with Snow Leopard. Since I'd been considering upgrading for some time (but NOT read any fine print), I back-tracked and downloaded Mountain Lion. Then I downloaded and installed iMovie '11.
THEN, I noticed thosse funny marks in my dock. When I tried these icons I got the dreaded message "You can't open the application [AppName] because PowerPC applications are no longer supported."
Apps effected: Adobe CS2; Adobe Bridge; Microsoft Office (2004); Epson Scan.
This was brand-new news to me. I have tried to find out what if anything I can do about the loss of these apps (everyone of them legally-purchased items), and apparently I'm just without alternatives. Current version of CS6, about $600. Cheapest MS Office, $80. This is a BAD TRADE for a $20 OS upgrade!
And Epson Scan? There's one for the books. Epson sends me to the Apple Store, saying that is the only place to get an upgrade. Apple Store sees no problems, and informs me that there are no upgrades available or needed. System Preferences/Print & Scan sees the scanner, so that's not the problem.
About the internal optical drive: Before the OSX upgrade, the drive was working nominally. I know, because I burned a number of disks within the last week or two. Now? The drive appears to recognize music CDs, but it WILL NOT recognize blank disk media. I have tried both Toast Titanium 7 (most recent) and since that wouldn't work I tried OSX's native disk burning function. In neither case will the drive admit that it has a blank disk inserted. I just ruminates for 15-20 seconds and spits the disk out.
I also have an older Plextor external optical drive. But Apple Support itself gives completely mixed counsel regarding whether or not Mountain Lion can be used with an external optical drive. One place says it will work; another place tells you to use a networked computer's optical drive (!); many other places say an external drive won't work at all. Hey Apple, make up your mind!
Now, I'm sure somewhere in fine legal print they informed me that PowerPC apps would no longer work with ML. But that information was well-hidden, and did not surface in any professional reviews I read. So these behaviors were a complete surprise to me, and not the pleasant sort.
Needless to say, I'm left feeling really ill-used by Apple. Sure, I've got an up-to-date operating system, but now I'm left counting the costs. And so should you. The technically-oriented in this community will perhaps sneer at my naivete. But you need to recognize that not all Apple clients are technically up to your standards. Give us a break!! [I myself have been using PCs intensively since the second-generation IBM PC in the late 1970's.]
I'm ticked. In case it's not obvious. And feeling let down by Apple. And I've been a cheer-leader for them for many years.

I feel your pain! This happened to me with I replaced my dead iMac G5 with a new Mac Mini in August, 2011 and did not do my usual due diligence on Lion!
Try Apple's Image Capture application, provided for free in the Applications folder with your Epson. I use it all the time for my Epson Artisan 810.
Toast 7 is way too old; I think they are up to 11 or 12 now. But you should be able to burn discs from the Finder in any event.
Which iMac do you have; check the Model Identifier in About this Mac, More Info, System Report.
Since my Mac Mini has no optical drive, I use one that I purchased for $39 from Fry's some years ago to get the ability to burn DL DVDs and it seems to run fine in Lion with Toast 10.
Here is a "canned" answer I give for many in your situation. Study all of this and respond with more information so we can guide you to your solution:
Unfortunately you got caught up in the minor miracle of Rosetta. Originally licensed by Apple when it migrated from the PowerPC CPU platform that it had used from the mid-1990's until the Intel CPU platform in 2006, Rosetta allowed Mac users to continue to use their library of PPC software transparently in emulation.
However, Apple's license to continue to use this technology expired with new releases of OS X commencing with Lion (and now Mountain Lion). While educational efforts have been made over the last 6 years, the fact is that Rosetta was SO successful that many users were caught unaware UNTIL they upgraded to Lion or Mountain Lion.
Workarounds:
1. If your Mac will support it, restore OS X Snow Leopard;
2. If your Mac will support it, partition your hard drive or add an external hard drive and install Snow Leopard into it and use the "dual-boot" method to choose between your PowerPC software or Lion/Mt. Lion;
3. Upgrade your software to Intel compatible versions if they are available, or find alternative software that will open your data files, modify them and save them;
4. Install Snow Leopard Server (with Rosetta) into Parallels or VMWare Fusion for concurrent use of your PowerPC applications with Lion or Mt. Lion:
[click on image to enlarge]
Apple has now restarted to sell Snow Leopard Server at a 95% discount over its original price: only $19.99 + sales tax & shipping; telephone orders only, call 800-MYAPPLE (800-692-7753) - Apple Part Number: MC588Z/A
NOTE: Computer games with complex, 3D or fast motion graphics may not work well or at all in virtualization.
I am surprised that the professional reviews did not mention the lack of Rosetta in Mountain Lion.
When one similarly frustrated poster here on this forum expressed his sentiment that Apple should have posted a big red flag about Mountain Lion not having Rosetta, I pulled out my PowerPC version of Photoshop and created the image above!

Change the cost center

Hi all,
In a report, I must change the cost center for Purchase Requisition and Purchase Order.
In my opinion I must use the bapi: "BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE" and "BAPI_PO_CHANGE", but I don't know how to use.
Is this correct ?
If yes, can someone explain to me how to call them to change cost center ?
Thank you in advance.

Hi
Please refer the below link you may useful.
BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE
Thanks and regards,
Syf

My iPhone 6 plus screen was crashed, how much is the cost if I want to repair it at Apple? FYI: I didn't bought Applecare

My iPhone 6 plus screen was crashed, how much is the cost if I want to repair it at Apple? FYI: I didn't bought Applecare+. I bought my iPhone 6 plus 3 months ago in Singapore.

$129 US. https://www.apple.com/support/iphone/repair/screen-damage/ For local pricing call your nearest Apple store. If you live somewhere other than Singapore you'll have to send the phone to someone you trust in Singapore and have them take the phone in to have it repaired. iPhone's do not have an international warranty and can only be serviced in the country they were purchased.

How to restrict the Cost Center Search ?

Hi everybody,
Im a little bit worried... In my Org Model, I defined in the CNT user's attribute some Cost Centers.
I was thinking that this action would restrict the Cost Centers that the end-user can use.
Obviously not.. it seems that it is just a default value, but the user can search and put any cost center. The same concept applies for the GL account. =(
Somebody knows how to really restrict the cost centers that an user can use ?
I appreciate your help a lot !!!
Regards,
Diego

Hi Diego,
For cost centers search help in SRM, there are 2 options:
1 - You use the backend search help, then backend search help is called directly, and the attributes are not taken into account.
2 - You do not use the backend search help, then a HTML select option (dropdown list) of codes is shown to the user with all the values entered (one by one) in the user attributes (or herited values, but ranges are not supported).
The first option is used as soon as the user has the authorization object (authorization object SRM 3.0: M_BBP_SHLP; authorization object SRM 4.0: BBP_FUNCT/value: BE_F4_HELP)
What I understand, is that you want to use the backend search help, with a limitation upon the user attributes: this can be done using the search help BADI.
Regards.
Vadim

CO product..How to allocate the cost

Hi,
Anybody can guide me and thro' some light on how can i allocate the cost to a Co-Product from the main header materials.
What is the use of the tab " JOINT PRODUCT " in costing view in the material master,in the same tab we have something called source structure and equivalance number.How can i use it.
I want to alocate the CO Product cost in the ratio of 7:2:1.
I mean to say that allocation to main material A is 70%,Material B is 20% and Co Product is 10%.
How can i bring this into SAP system.
We are in REIM profile..i.e REPETATIVE MANUFACTURING.
I looking for your valuable feedback and suggestion....
Thnx in advance..
God Bless

Hello,
SAP system has provided excellent & user friendly tools for co-product / joint product costing via source structure and equivalence number. You need to maintain those source structure, equivalence numbers etc. (Your %s u2013 70%, 20 % are equivalent numbers)
For more details, refer to following link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/90/ba620e446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
Ambadas

Cost Center in the costing sheet

Hello All,
We have set up the costing sheet with the material overhead flowing to a cost center 99XX through cost element 8XXXXX (in the "credit" view of the costing sheet) for all production orders. Now, there is a requirement whereby the material overhead for production orders of a certain division need to be allocated to another cost center 91XX.
Please let me know if this is feasible and if yes, how this can be done?
Thanks,
Rugmani

Hi Rajan
What is the basis of overhead absorption? I mean is it a % of some cost or Quantity based?
Different credits for same secondary cost ele is possible only by way of origin group.... And origin group is applicable to the input components in a BOM and not the Output (Header) material
A. So, if your overhead absorption is based on input materials and if these input materials are specific only to one Division/ Header material, you can achieve what you want with the std SAP functinality. But, normally in a prod scenario, this is not the case... One input material can be used across multiple divisions...
B. If this is not your case, then may be you need to consider CO substitution using a user exit or the relevant exit/BAPI called during CO43
C. Another option is to post the credit to one cost center and then do KB11N to transfer it to relevant cost center.... Info required to do this can be easily made available Like this
1. Double click on the credit line items in a cost center report (S_ALR_87013611) and choose to display actual line items
2. Plug in the partner object using change layout option
3. partner object will show you the Prod Order No... From prod order no, you can get the material and the division....
you can develop an ABAP report to give you this info...
Regards
Ajay M

Explain about the cost, bytes & cardinality calculation in oracle9i

Hi All,
Any one can explain about the cost, bytes & cardinality calculation in oracle 9i.
Actually I want to understand the behaviour of execution plan taken by oracle.
Here is one example.
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=51 Card=1 Bytes=424)
1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=51 Card=1 Bytes=424)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_ADDRESS_M'
3 2 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=43 Card=1 Bytes=424)
4 3 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=43 Card=1 Bytes=350)
5 4 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=43 Card=1 Bytes=296)
6 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=40 Card=1 Bytes=242)
7 6 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=15 Card=1 Bytes=193)
8 7 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=13 Card=1 Bytes=164)
9 8 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=10 Card=1 Bytes=138)
10 9 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=9 Card=1 Bytes=125)
11 10 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=57)
12 11 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_BRANCH_M' (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=20)
13 12 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'NBFC_BRANCH_M_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1)
14 11 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CS_ALLOCATION_HDR' (Cost=5 Card=1 Bytes=37)
15 14 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'CS_ALLOCATION_QUEING' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=2)
16 10 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LEA_AGREEMENT_DTL' (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=68)
17 16 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'LEA_AGREEMENT_DTL_UQ' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1)
18 9 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0016578' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=13)
19 8 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LEA_ASSET_M' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=26)
20 19 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'LEA_ASSET_M_CDX1'(NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
21 7 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_CUSTOMER_M' (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=29)
22 21 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'NBFC_CUSTOMER_M_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Card=1)
23 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_CHEQUE_DTL' (Cost=25 Card=1 Bytes=49)
24 23 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NBFC_CHEQUE_DTL_IDX1'(NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=23)
25 5 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_ADDRESS_M' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=54)
26 25 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UK_BPID_BPTYPE_ADDTYPE'(NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
27 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'NBFC_ADDRESS_M'
28 27 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NBFC_ADDRESS_M_CDX1' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=2)
29 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NBFC_ADDRESS_M_CDX1' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=2)
Statistics
1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
117 consistent gets
108 physical reads
0 redo size
2181 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1185 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
Actully I don't know how to post the thread in proper format so example is not formatted.
Thanx.. Ratan

Cardinality is the number of rows.
Cost -- think that is relative.
Bytes -- the amount of data?
Tom Kyte has a really nice explanation of this in Effective Oracle by Design -- but I left it at work.

The cost to call Mexico

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for