The HTTP authentication test failed on activesync exchange 2010

`21

Testing HTTP Authentication Methods for URL https://xxxxxdyndns.biz/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/.
The HTTP authentication test failed
Additional Details
The Initial Anonymous HTTPS request didn't fail, but Anonymous isn't a supported authentication method for this scenario.
Elapsed Time: 670 ms

Similar Messages

Lync mobility and HTTP authentication test failed. Is reverse proxy required?

I currently have the following setup.
1 x 2013 edge server lync1.local.com
has 3 dmz ips for external names
has 1 internal ip
2 x 2013 std front end servers lync2 & lync3.local.com
Ive read that in 2013 the mobility service is installed automatically on the front end servers and i do see it running on both.
All my clients can connect from the windows and mac clients(internally and externally) but not from phone or windows app store client (internally or externally)
running the exchangeconnectivity test on the website i get the following error
Testing HTTP authentication methods for URL https://lyncdiscover.external.com/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root/user.
HTTP authentication test failed.
Additional Details
A Web exception occurred because an HTTP 404 - NotFound response was received from Unknown.
HTTP Response Headers:
X-MS-Server-Fqdn: lync1.local.com
Connection: close
Content-Length: 64
Content-Type: text/plain
Server: RTC/5.0
Elapsed Time: 427 ms.
After some reading I notice that many people refer to a reverse proxy when dealing with mobility.
I do not have a reverse proxy server installed. Is this required for the mobility to work correctly? I cant just use the edge server?
Thanks in advance for any help.

Take a look at Georg Thomas' blog: http://www.lynced.com.au/2014/04/configure-citrix-netscaler-vpx-as.html also the Citrix official documentation: http://www.citrix.com/global-partners/microsoft/netscaler.html
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

HTTP Authentication Test Failed

When I run the remote connectivity analyzer for ActiveSync on Exchange 2013 I get the following error:
An HTTP 500 response was returned from Unknown.
Headers received:
Content-Length: 75
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:31:51 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.0
HTTP Response Headers:
Content-Length: 75
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:31:51 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.0
Elapsed Time: 73 ms.
I found one post that suggested enabling Windows Authentication which I did and still not luck.
Thanks,
Ryan

Below is the message in the IIS log. I was able to get my phone connected but I had to connect to the internal WiFi and use the internal hostname. It then pulled the certificate and allowed me to connect internally or externally. I believe the issue is somewhere
with the certificate. Its a wildcard cert but does contain the external host name of the server. I have verified firewall settings and everything is correct.
2014-04-16 14:48:38 10.5.5.27 OPTIONS /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/default.eas &cafeReqId=63a9c965-7f0f-4a45-9241-ee8ee409f65d; 443 motorola-DROID4/1.0 - 401 1 1326 93

How do we determine the HTTP authentication header for our hosted solution?

How do we determine the HTTP authentication header (adobeconnect_admin_httpauth) from our hosted solution? The documentation says to find it in a custom.ini file but I have no clue how to access that.
I need to supply that to the adobeconnect plugin used with a Moodle instance, screnshot below.
If it helps, when I click "Test Connection", I see the following output.
A series of tests have been run in order to determine whether the Adobe Connect Pro server has been properly setup for this integration to work and to also determine whether the user credentials provided in the activity global settings has the correct permissions to perform the neccessary tasks required by the activity module. If any of the tests below have failed, this activity module will not function properly.
For further assistance and documentation in how to set up your Adobe Connect Pro server please consult the MoodleDocs help page for this activity module Help page
Sending common-info call:
successfully obtained the session key: na11breezrirhb4f4ryf5shqy
successfully logged in as admin user
Testing retrevial of shared content, recording and meeting folders:
error obtaining shared content folder
XML request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <params><param name="action">sco-shortcuts</param></params>
XML response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <results><status code="no-access" subcode="no-login"/></results>
error obtaining forced-archives (meeting recordings) folder
XML request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <params><param name="action">sco-shortcuts</param></params>
XML response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <results><status code="no-access" subcode="no-login"/></results>
error obtaining meetings folder
XML request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <params><param name="action">sco-shortcuts</param></params>
XML response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <results><status code="no-access" subcode="no-login"/></results>
error creating meeting testmeetingtest folder
XML request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <params><param name="action">sco-update</param><param name="type">meeting</param><param name="name">testmeetingtest</param><param name="folder-id"/><param name="date-begin">2015-03-14T06:53:39.000+00:00</param><param name="date-end">2015-03-14T07:53:39.000+00:00</param></params>
XML response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <results><status code="invalid"><invalid field="folder-id" type="id" subcode="format"/></status></results>
error creating user testusertest
XML request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <params><param name="action">principal-update</param><param name="first-name">testusertest</param><param name="last-name">testusertest</param><param name="login">[email protected]</param><param name="password">9B396EA828A00203FB3E8E69010FE537</param><param name="extlogin">[email protected]</param><param name="type">user</param><param name="send-email">false</param><param name="has-children">0</param><param name="email">[email protected]</param></params>
XML response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <results><status code="no-access" subcode="no-login"/></results>
What are we missing?
Thanks!

Here is the docuementation for loging in with an HTTP Headder Adobe Connect 9 * Log in from an application
Seeing as there may be some modification to files on the server, you may need to work with Adobe Support to see if they can be modified in the Hosted environment.Adobe Connect Help | Adobe Connect Support

The Test-OrganizationRelationship function on Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup4 error

Hi
If I run Test-OrganizationRelationship function on Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup4 the fallowing error appear:
[PS] C:\WINDOWS\system32>Test-OrganizationRelationship -Identity "emag" -UserIdentity [email protected] -verbose
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.359 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Active Directory session settings for
'Test-OrganizationRelationship' are: View Entire Forest: 'False', Default Scope: 'hq.flanco.ro', Configuration Domain
Controller: 'CALYPSO.hq.flanco.ro', Preferred Global Catalog: 'CALYPSO.hq.flanco.ro', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{
CALYPSO.hq.flanco.ro }'
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.359 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Runspace context: Executing user: hq.flanco.ro/FLANCO -
Users/HQ/IT/Marian NICA, Executing user organization: , Current organization: , RBAC-enabled: Enabled.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.359 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Beginning processing &
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.359 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Instantiating handler with index 0 for cmdlet extension
agent "Admin Audit Log Agent".
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.391 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Current ScopeSet is: { Recipient Read Scope: {{, }},
Recipient Write Scopes: {{, }}, Configuration Read Scope: {{, }}, Configuration Write Scope(s): {{, }, }, Exclusive
Recipient Scope(s): {}, Exclusive Configuration Scope(s): {} }
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.391 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Searching objects "[email protected]" of type "ADUser"
under the root "$null".
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.406 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Previous operation run on global catalog server
'CALYPSO.hq.flanco.ro'.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.406 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Searching objects "emag" of type "OrganizationRelationship"
under the root "$null".
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.406 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Previous operation run on domain controller
'CALYPSO.hq.flanco.ro'.
VERBOSE: Test that organization relationships are properly configured.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.406 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Resolved current organization: .
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.406 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Calling the Microsoft Exchange Autodiscover service for the
remote federation information.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.983 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Autodiscover call succeeded for the following URL:
https://autodiscover.emag.ro/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.983 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Autodiscover call succeeded for the following URL:
https://autodiscover.emag.ro/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc.
VERBOSE: [12:24:44.983 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Generating delegation token for user [email protected]
for application FYDIBOHF25SPDLT.exchangedelegation.emag.ro.
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.138 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The delegation token was successfully generated.
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.138 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Microsoft Exchange Autodiscover service is being called
to determine the remote organization relationship settings.
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.138 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Client will call the Microsoft Exchange Autodiscover
service using the following URL: https://autodiscover.emag.ro/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc/WSSecurity.
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.185 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Microsoft Exchange Autodiscover service failed to be
called at 'https://autodiscover.emag.ro/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc/WSSecurity' because the following error occurred:
SoapException.Code =
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd:InvalidSecurityToken
Exception:
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHeaderException: An error occurred when processing the security tokens in the
message.
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse(SoapClientMessage message, WebResponse
response, Stream responseStream, Boolean asyncCall)
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.CustomSoapHttpClientProtocol.<>c__DisplayClass4.<Invoke>b__3()
   at
Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.HttpAuthenticator.NoHttpAuthenticator.AuthenticateAndExecute[T](SoapHttpClientProtocol
client, AuthenticateAndExecuteHandler`1 handler)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.SoapHttpClientAuthenticator.AuthenticateAndExecute[T](SoapHttpClientProtocol
client, AuthenticateAndExecuteHandler`1 handler)
   at
Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.AutoDiscover.DefaultBinding_Autodiscover.GetOrganizationRelationshipSettings(GetOrgani
zationRelationshipSettingsRequest Request)
   at
Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Sharing.TestOrganizationRelationship.<>c__DisplayClass8.<GetInvokeDelegate>b__7(DefaultBi
nding_Autodiscover binding)
   at
Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.AutodiscoverClient.<>c__DisplayClassf.<InvokeAndFollowSecureRedirects>b__c(IWebProxy
webProxy)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.AutodiscoverClient.InvokeWithWebProxy(String url, InvokeWithWebProxyDelegate
invokeWithWebProxy)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.AutodiscoverClient.InvokeAndFollowSecureRedirects(InvokeDelegate invokeDelegate,
Uri url)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.SoapWebClient.AutodiscoverClient.InvokeForUrl(InvokeDelegate invokeDelegate, Uri url)
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.185 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : The Autodiscover call failed.
RunspaceId : b3b378f5-d912-4042-b578-e949b54da4c1
Identity    :
Id          : AutodiscoverServiceCallFailed
Status      : Error
Description : The Autodiscover call failed.
IsValid     : True
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.185 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Admin Audit Log: Entered Handler:OnComplete.
VERBOSE: [12:24:46.185 GMT] Test-OrganizationRelationship : Ending processing &


It's not this, is it -
http://johanveldhuis.nl/en/error-occurred-processing-security-tokens-message/ ?

[svn] 1743: In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels .

Revision: 1743
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-05-15 12:26:11 -0700 (Thu, 15 May 2008)
Log Message:
In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels. Before the tests were just running over the first/default channel in the destination. Now the tests will be hardcoded to run over a particular channel. In this checkin I am removing the existing authentication tests and checking in tests that run over a polling amf channel. Tests for other channels are coming soon.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/messaging-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
Removed Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest_Streaming.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

Bypass the http authentication on router

Hi
how could i bypass the http authentication on router , i tried the below command but in vain
no ip http authentication local
thanks

Hello Bilal
Not sure I understand your question ? - The OP has asked can you connect to the http server without authentication.
I understand by that they are asking how to connect to the http server via port 80 (router that is) - so disabling authentication and http-secure-server(if enable) and defaulting to port 80 with let you connect .
By the way congratulations on your CCIE accreditation very well done - I believe your in your only early 20's as well - So a future quadruple CCIE maybe?
Exceptional achievement Bilal !
res
Paul

[svn:bz-trunk] 14419: Updated the custom authentication test.

Revision: 14419
Revision: 14419
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-02-25 06:25:01 -0800 (Thu, 25 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
Updated the custom authentication test.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/apps/team/features/security-constraints/securityConstraint_Custom.mxml

What is the total space Update Rollup 7 For Exchange 2010 SP3 (KB2961522) will take after installation?

Quick question.
What is the total space Update Rollup 7 For Exchange 2010 SP3 (KB2961522) will take after installation?
Hasan

Hi
Your question is a big vague. Extracting the rollup will use some space but you can delete the files afterwards.
Are you concerned about space while installing? If you have adequate space it shouldnt be a problem.
Hope this helps. Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
I am asking space after installation, it will definitely install some files so how much space extra space it needed in exchange directory drive.
Hasan

The attempt to contact Autodiscover using the HTTP Redirect method failed. Exchange 2007 to Office 365 Cutover Mirgation

I am getting the following error message shown below. Wondering if i could get some help on how to resolve this issue.

My understanding is that the only way to resolve this issue is to install an Exchange 2010 or 2013 server in your on-premises organization and configure that as a hybrid server. Once you configure your Autodiscover record to point to the Office 365
hostname as shown in "domains", this should no longer be an issue.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

On SCVMM 2012 R2 While adding Loadbalancer with NSVPX-HyperV-10.1-119.7_nc, the Retrieve-LBSystemInfo test fails with Error 21426

Hi,
I'm trying to add Citrix LoadBalancer (NSVPX-HyperV-10.1-119.7_nc) in VMM 2012 R2 and on click of test button, only the "Retrieve-LBSystemInfo" test is failing with Error Code 21426 and exception as below. Whereas, rest of
the test are getting passed.
Can anyone please let me know whether am I missing anything? FYI, I configured citrix lb as per blog: http://kristiannese.blogspot.in/2011/07/load-balancing-and-cloud-computing.html

Your problem sounds similar to this one, except that they're using software raid rather than just pure LVM. If you're using an initrd, you may not have the appropriate modules installed. If you're not using an initrd, then the kernel probably needs LVM support compiled in (not as a module) and could be solved by fixing that. I have never used the ck-patchset, but this should give you an additional data point.
Also comment=systemd.automount will be deprecated soon as I understand it; if you have a need for automounting, x-systemd.automount should be used instead.

Outlook multi-day (not 'all day') meeting requests showing up as 1 day off on iphone attached Activesync Exchange 2010 accounts

Exchange 2010 SP2 Server
iPhone iOS 5.01 (4/4s) using ActiveSync
Outlook 2007 clients
When multi-day (not 'all day') meeting requests or appointments are being sent to email accounts which have an iPhone attached to the Exchange account via ActiveSync, the iPhone accepts the meeting request but then moves the event one day later than what it was originally scheduled and posts it to Outlook - also 1 day later than it is supposed to be.
For example: A meeting request comes into my that is schedule for 9AM-4PM M-W but when I accept it on my iphone it gets posted to my calendar as an ALL DAY event but T-Thu
We upgraded to Exchange SP2 because some of the threads were alluding that SP2 would fix it - it didn't. I know the fix is to rip out the event to separate calendar events but this will not work for reqeusts coming from outside. And this is too tedious. If anything, it is a serious bug.
Anybody seen this before?
Thanks,
Monty.

I am experiencing a similar problem with a client of mine who is using Microsoft's Cloud-based Exchange server, Office 365. I suspect the Office 365 server is an Exchange 2010 server, similar to your environment. Check out my tests below which I think define when the day shifting happens.
I see that you applied SP2 to your Exchange 2010 environment, but have you also applied Update Rollup 1? See this article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2563324. It would be interesting to know whether that rollup resolves your problem.
I have done some pretty extensive testing and have posted in the Office 365 Support Forum (http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/146/p/53396/192332.aspx#192332) Here is a summary of my testing.
I am having the exact same problem described by Jim Edmonds and jkwmail (http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/176/p/19921/93304.aspx#93304) with one of my clients who is not very happy about this or our inability to resolve the problem. Here is what I am experiencing:
When an appointment in Office 365 spans multiple days, the appointment gets converted to an All Day Event and moved forward one day on an iPhone ActiveSync client.
I have completed the following troubleshooting:
1 - Using my GMail Account and my work email account on MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 Server I created separate single day appointments in the morning from each account spanning two hours and invited my client who is using MS Outlook 2010 and Office 365.
    Result: The appointments show the correct date and time on my Outlook, MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 OWA, and iPhone as well as my client's Outlook, Office 365 webmail, and iPhone.
2 - Using my GMail Account and my work email account on MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 Server I created separate single day appointments in the afternoon from each account spanning two hours and invited my client who is using MS Outlook 2010 and Office 365.
    Result: The appointments show the correct date and time on my Outlook, MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 OWA, and iPhone as well as my client's Outlook, Office 365 webmail, and iPhone.
3 - Using my GMail Account and my work email account on MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 Server I created separate multi-day appointments from Friday at 5 PM to Monday at 8 AM from each account and invited my client who is using MS Outlook 2010 and Office 365.
    Result: The appointments show the correct date and time on my Outlook, MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 OWA, and iPhone as well as my client's Outlook and Office 365 webmail. However, on my client's iPhone, the time on the appointments had changed to an all day event and the start date was shifted one day forward, Saturday, and the end date was Monday unless the appointment end time was after the appointment start time in which case it created an All Day Event on Tuesday as well. For Example: If the appointment was from 8 AM Friday Morning to 8 AM Monday Morning, the iPhone would show an All Day Event on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. If the appointment was from 8 AM Friday Morning to 8:30 AM Monday Morning, the iPhone would show an All Day Event on Saturday, Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday. If the appointment was from 8 AM Friday Morning to 7:30 AM Monday Morning, the iPhone would show an All Day Event on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. This was also true for appointments starting on Friday at 5 PM and ending on Monday at 5 PM, starting on Friday at 5 PM and ending on Monday at 5:30 PM, and starting on Friday at 5 PM and ending on Monday at 4:30 PM as in the above AM examples.
*** Again I would like to note that on my iPhone which is connected to my company's MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 server, the multi-day appointment shows up correctly with correct start and end times and is not converted to an All Day Event. ***
It would seem this is a problem with ActiveSync on Office 365 and iOS devices. What is particularly frustrating is that this exact problem is identified in KB 2563324 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2563324) Issue 1.6 - "An appointment is longer than 24 hours is changed to a multi-day All Day Event" which states: "To resolve this issue, install Update Rollup 1 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 (SP2)." Since this is a cloud based service, we do not have the ability to either see what the current version of the Exchange service we are connected to is or update the service with this patch level.
4 - I performed the above three tests with my client creating the events in MS Outlook 2010 and inviting my work account on the MS Exchange 2007 SP 2 Server and got the exact same results.
5 - My client's iPhone is running iOS 4.3 and my iPhone is running iOS 5.1.0. In order to test this without going through the update process on my client's iPhone, I set up his Office 365 account on my iPhone and performed the tests in numbers 1-4 from above, viewing the results on my iPhone, and got the exact same results.
6 - Today, I tried this with a different Office 365 account, performed the multi-day test in number 3 from above and got the exact same results.
7 - Today I also upgraded my iPhone to iOS 5.1.1, performed the multi-day test in number 3 from above and got the exact same results.
8 - I have confirmed that all time zones are set correctly. I have checked the iPhone, OWA, Office 365 Webmail, etc.
I believe the problem in my case is with the Office 365 environment and not the iOS device. However, trying to get support from these large companies seems to be very difficult?
Does anyone from Apple know if this is an iOS bug or a problem with Exchange 2010/Office 365?
Thanks...
Jp

Force email download in HTML or text format on iPhone/iPad with ActiveSync (Exchange 2010 SP3)

Hi,
When an HTML email with attachment is received on iPhone/iPad (iOS 8.2),
it can be downloaded in three cases of
intermittents ways :
- The full message is downloaded in HTML format
- The message is download in text format and a
"Download full message" link is displayed
at the bottom of the message
- The message is displayed in text format,
but continues to download the rest of the message.
When the download is complete, the message is displayed
in HTML format.
This behavior is intermittent. The Apple's support
says it is a particular configuration on Exchange server
that causes this behavior.
I want to know if there is a way to fix
this problem and force download email
either in text or HTML format ?
This problem occurs on iPhones/iPad
(iOS8.2) with ActiveSync account (Exchange 2010
SP3). It occurs also with Outlook.com account.
On the Exchange 2010 SP3 server, The MaxEmailBodyTruncationSize
and MaxEmailHTMLBodyTruncationSize settings are
unlimited in ActiveSync policies.
Thank you for your help.

Hi,
We can configure Exchange ActiveSync Mailbox Policy Properties to force device download HTML or text format email.
Use the EMC to view or configure Exchange ActiveSync Mailbox Policy by the following steps:
In the console tree, navigate to Organization Configuration >
Client Access.
In the result pane, click the Exchange ActiveSync Mailbox Policies tab, and then select the policy you want to view or configure.
In the action pane, click Properties.
Under the Sync Settings tab, check or uncheck the box
Allow HTML-formatted e-mail. Select this check box to enable e-mail messages that are formatted in HTML to be synchronized to the mobile phone. If this check box isn't selected, all e-mail messages will be converted to plain text before synchronization.
And use this command to configure whether allow text messaging on the mobile phone. The Exchange Enterprise Client Access License is required to change the values of this setting.
Set-ActiveSyncMailboxPolicy -Identity PolicyName –AllowTextMessaging $True
For more information, please refer to this document.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123484(v=exchg.141).aspx
Best Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Lynn-Li
TechNet Community Support

Staging the NLB cluster Static port change of Exchange 2010 CAS or do it all in one day ?

Folks,
Here is the server deployment in my AD domain:
Email flow and Outlook client connection go through the NLB cluster VIP email.domain.com.au which is served by the following server:
PRODHT-CAS01 (HT-CAS Server Windows NLB node 1)
PRODHT-CAS02 (HT-CAS Server Windows NLB node 2)
Public Folder access through Outlook client goes through the following servers:
PRODMBX01 (Stand-alone Mailbox Server 1) no DAG
PRODMBX02 (Stand-alone Mailbox Server 2) no DAG
Can I make the changes first on the first stack of Exchange Server set as below first:
PRODHT-CAS01 (HT-CAS Server NLB node 1)
PRODMBX01 (Stand-alone Mailbox Server 1) no DAG
in order to test the Outlook email & Public Folder connectivity in the first week and then followed by the rest of the server set:
PRODHT-CAS02 (HT-CAS Server NLB node 2)
PRODMBX02 (Stand-alone Mailbox Server 2) no DAG
would that cause the NLB or user email access problem?
Do I have to make the changes all in one day for those four servers followed by the reboot?
Reason of changing: The hardware load balancer (Riverbed) requires to have static RPC port to work properly.
This is the article to change the Static port in my NLB cluster Exchange HT-CAS server role on Exchange Server 2010 SP2: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/864.configure-static-rpc-ports-on-an-exchange-2010-client-access-server.aspx
Thanks in advance.
/* Server Support Specialist */

All the servers behind the load balancer must be the same.
You can change the stand alone MBX server's RCA port as that traffic is not load balanced.
Changing Exchange is straight forward, just be careful to enter the registry keys correctly and then check AB and RCA is listening on the new static ports after you restart the services.
Cheers,
Rhoderick
Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
Blog:
http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne
Twitter:   LinkedIn:
  Facebook:
  XING:
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.
Rhoderick,
Many thanks for the suggestion. My goal here is to minimize any impact / email service downtime to the user while configuring the static ports.
1. Do I have to dissolve the Windows NLB cluster after the static port configuration on both HT-CAS servers or can I still keep the NLB cluster?
2. "All the servers behind the load balancer must be the same." Do you mean do I have to do the static RPC port the same day for all server set ?
/* Server Support Specialist */

Comparing-the-differences-between-anti-spam-agents-from-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2013

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/23582.comparing-the-differences-between-antispam-agents-from-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2013.aspx
Sathish

Hello,
This forum is for discussions and questions regarding profiles and Microsoft's recognition system on the MSDN and TechNet sites. It is not for products/technologies.
As it's off-topic here, I am moving the question to the
Where is the forum for... forum.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book: Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

The HTTP authentication test failed on activesync exchange 2010

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for