The next version of TES

We have installed the Tidal Enterprise Scheduler 6.1.0 version this year. When is the next major version of the TES base product going to be released? What features will the next version offer? Thanks!

TES 6.2 is the next version being worked on and it is tentatively expected to come out by late 2013. The following are the key features getting addressed in 6.2:
New adapter for UCS Manager
Multi-domain AD support for Client Manager
Runtime users support for TES workgroups
Ability to terminate user sessions
Automated patch installation
CM install enhancements to utilize external cache
Improved documentation: REST API, installation, upgrades
Automated log collection and bundling
Performance and Quality Improvements

Similar Messages

The Next Version of Premiere Pro CC - Warp Stabilizer

With the recent post of what's coming in the next version of PPro CC, I was sad to see no mention of Warp Stabilizer. As amazing of an effect as it is, it needs a bit of help. I know there are improvements and fixes that probably weren't mentioned in the post so I'm still holding out hope. We use Warp Stabilizer more than anyone I know. Several hundred times per week. Yes, per week, no exaggeration. Over the last few years, we've built an entire style of shooting around the strengths of this awesome effect that emulates the use of a slider, steadicam and crane all without having to have them. So we've become really familiar with its PROS and CONS.
Here is a short list of SEVEN things that should be addressed with regards to warp stabilizer within Premiere Pro CC to maximize its effectiveness (and yes we did submit multiple Feature Requests for these so far to no avail):
FIrst and foremost and by far MOST IMPORTANT to us - Allow users to create a CUSTOM PRESET with any altered settings that will engage (or begin Analyzing/Stabilizing) automatically when added to a clip!! This is huge. If you double click on Warp Stabilizer with a clip selected, it is applied to that clip and begins the process of stabilizing that clip. However, the vast majority of the time we need to alter the settings of the effect. If we create a custom preset, that's all fine and good, but when we add that to a clip, it does NOT begin stabilizing. Instead you have to manually go into the Effect Controls for each clip and select ANALYZE. Huge waste of time when adding this effect to hundreds of clips. PLEASE FIX!
BUG when saving projects!!! - If this is not a bug, it needs to be fixed because it's awful. - If you have more than one sequence with multiple warp stabilizations added and GPU ACCELERATION IS ENABLED, then after you SAVE a project (or if it auto-saves) when you toggle between the two sequences you are hit with a delay or freeze while the render bar goes from Yellow to Red...and finally back to yellow again. No work can be done during this delay/freeze. The more stabilized clips, the longer the delay. For us, on our larger projects this delay is sometimes 30 seconds to almost a full minute! Once it turns back to yellow, you can toggle between sequences without the delay...but as soon as it saves again...and you toggle between sequences, the delay hits again. If this is a bug, or somehow a result of Premiere Pro's way of CACHING projects after it's saved, then I sincerely hope it's fixed asap. It's awful!
The third is more of a feature request than a fix - Add the ability to set the maximum scale to work WITH the smoothness control so that if you never want your clips to scale more than say 105%, you can set that and have Warp Stabilizer stabilize the clip and adjust the "smoothness" percentage from the default "50%" down to whatever it needs to be in order for that clip to be fully stabilized and scaled to no more than 105%. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not possible currently. Right now we have to manually adjust each clip if it is initially scaled too much by dropping down the Smoothness %.
Another great feature would be the ability to manually keyframe the scaling so that if you have a longer clip that starts fairly steady, then needs to be smoothed out a bit more in the middle, before it ends relatively steady again, you can slowly and seamlessly ramp up the stabilization/scaling so that the whole clip doesn't have to be scaled to make up for the misgivings of one portion of the clip.
Minor bug - sometimes when you have extended the length of a clip, the clip needs to be re-analyzed again. However, the "analyze" button is often greyed out. You need to click away from the clip and then click on the clip again to make that button appear again. Nothing big, but still, a small bug.
After Effects Warp Stablizer VFX feature carried over - It would be nice to carry over to Premiere the ability to isolate what in frame is supposed to be stable (sometimes someone nodding their head can trick the effect into thinking that it's the camera shaking). Great to have it in AE, but would be nice to carry over to Premiere Pro CC.
Finally, I've always believed that no matter how cool "Subspace Warp" sounds, it is not as effective as "Position, Scale & Rotation". This SHOULD be the deafult "method" within the Warp's settings. I'd say 95% of the thousands and thousands of clips we've stabilized we ended up switching the "Method" within the settings to "Position, Scale & Rotation" because it either scaled the shot less or created less "wobble" in the resulting stabilized clip. I know everyone shoots differently, and sometimes Subspace Warp is the way to go, but we have stabilized all sorts of shots with great success by simply switching this setting. Granted...if #1 on this list was taken care of we could then easily have this set as our default setting.
Hopefully this list either reaches someone within Adobe that can do something about them or at the very least inspires others to write feature requests and bug fixes as we have. Even resolving #1, #2 and #3 would be HUGE and would save our editors probably 10 hours per week. It's an awesome effect, far better than "smoothcam" on FCP7, it just needs a little love.

CoSA_DaveS wrote:
All good points, thanks for posting.
For #1, you can make this work in AE at least. This tip is from my colleague DanW:
If you make a preset by only selecting the values you change (and not a preset for the whole effect) then it will auto-analyze on apply.
Simplest way: apply WS, make edits, hit UU to reveal changed params, select all "i-beams" in the Timeline, drag them to the Effects & Presets panel.
For #4, you can get manual control over the scaling by setting Framing to Stabilize Only, and then keyframe Additional Scale to taste. At one point we were going to try to automate this, but found automatic scaling to be very subjective as to the best way to handle it.
For #6, Warp Stabilizer will not track areas with zero alpha channel. So you can pre-mask the input to reveal just the parts you want to stabilize. Do this inside a nested sequence, with Warp Stabilizer applied downstream (in the outer sequence). The just-announced masking & tracking capabilities of the next CC version should be handy for this.
-DaveS, Adobe Dynamic Media, Advanced Product Development
Hi DaveS!
Great to hear that you guys are taking a look at this list. Hope it helps make it better. #1, #2, and #3 are by far the biggest time killers for us so hopefully they'll be able to be fixed/resolved within Premiere soon.
Regarding your note about #1: Allowing this functionality within Premiere specifically would be very helpful. Would it be possible to eventually allow Premiere to auto-analyze when a saved custom preset is applied to a clip? I tried it in AE as you suggested, and couldn't figure it out. But realistically we use Warp Stabilizer on so many clips that round tripping literally hundreds of short clips to AE would be just as time consuming as going into the settings in premiere for each one and adjusting the parameters. We usually adjust the method and then adjust the smoothness scale so that it doesn't "Auto-Scale" more than 104%. That's where our #3 suggestion would help. I didn't quite understand how to make a preset of specific changed values. I tried, but couldn't follow DanW's suggestion. Granted, I'm not that great with AE. I really just use it for the Warp VFX's ability to isolate what in frame is stabilized (hope that comes to Premiere one day) and that's about it. And I really only have to do that a couple times per project. Anyway, I'm sure I'm doing DanW's suggestions wrong but regardless, I'm not sure it would save us much time when we have several hundred individual little clips that would all need to be sent to AE. Any hope for adding this auto-analyze functionality (hopefully allowing a custom preset on the whole effect and all it's adjusted parameters) in Premiere CC?
Regarding your note about #4: That is a valid work around for now. I appreciate that thought. Thanks!
Regarding your note about #6: I think I half understand what you described. I'd have to try it. Although, as I said before, the AE way of doing it is ideal and I just hoped that ability to show the tracking points and delete them over time would come to Premiere CC one day. When the next CC comes out I'd love to try this masking method although I think I'll have to claify exactly what you want me to do just to be safe. Is there no hope to port this added functionality that's in AE's Warp VFX over to Premiere's Warp Stabilizer? Again, not the end of the world for us. I'd rather #1, #2 and #3 be addressed inside Premiere Pro CC for now.
Fixing the first 3 on this list would be HUGE time saver for us.
Thanks again DaveS to you and the rest of the Adobe team for looking into this list. Very much appreciated.

What's new in the next version of Premiere Pro? Check it out!

Here's some of what's coming up in the next version of Premiere Pro and AE. Can't want to play with this!
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativecloud/cc/pd fs/nab2014-reveal-whats-new-for-pre-release-20140321.pdf?sdid=KLBWR
Preview videos here: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-at-nab-2014/whats-new-in-premiere-pro-cc-nab-2014/
Some awesome new stuff coming our way!
Fingers crossed they also fixed Multicam editing (i.e. intelligent separate window UI). I'll find out soon enough at NAB.

Lots of great new things coming our way!
However its seems that many basic improvements are still missing. Here's the list of items I'll be going over with the Adobe reps at NAB. See something missing in my list? Feel free to share!
Disappearing markers when track below a certain height (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6205015#6205015)
all effects on/off toggle, especially to disable transitions while working with keyframes in the ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6210552#6210552)
'Source Clip: Next/Previous' not working in full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6140378#6140378)
Effect presets too easy to rename by mistake
Auto color coding of clips with Warp stabilizer applied (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946227#5946227)
Project window tab name: just 'Project', nothing else (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5935706#5935706)
Multicam angles in separate, full screen viewable window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934039#5934039 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5931933#5931933)
Pasting at cursor position instead of lowest active track (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934219#5934219)
Remove gaps function (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946226#5946226)
Intelligent tooltips that report info on individual clip or selection, depending on what's selected (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934215#5934215)
Constant rasterization of titles and Illustrator files (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934211#5934211)
Multiple Effects windows (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5929261#5929261)
Default to first clip loaded in Source Monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5909239#5909239)
Sticky solo settings in Audio Meters window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5908879#5908879)
Smooth fades (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5901648#5901648)
Prevent off screen changes (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5792648#5792648)
Keep focus on Timeline when tilde toggling out of full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5777794#5777794)
Intelligent 'Nudge Clip Selection Down/Up' (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1267353?start=0&tstart=0)
Keyboard shortcuts to apply transitions to CTI only (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5542185#5542185 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5544651#5544651)
PP windows wirelessly sent to tablet/smartphone (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5538217#5538217
Drag/drop modified clips from Timeline to Project window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5300065#5300065)
Shift-toggle to restrict movement to up/down or left/right in Program monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5293341#5293341)
Smart Bins that auto collect certain asset types, such as titles
Ability to move entire motion path as in AE (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5292523#5292523)
Non-slipping keyframes in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5284322#5284322)
Aesthetically correct rounded/clipped corners in Titler
'Zoom to Keyframes' shortcut in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5192692#5192692)
Consistently intelligent font lists across all CC programs (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4955178#4955178)
Offscreen media overwrite warnings when moving a clip would overwrite content outside the viewable bounds of the Timeline (this would be an NLE first afaik)

What's coming in the next version of Premiere Pro CC

Hi all,
Here's a blog post by Al Mooney telling you about what's coming in the next version of Premiere Pro.
http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2014/04/thenextpremiereproccrelease.html
tclark also posted this link a bit earlier about all the CC video applications: http://blogs.adobe.com/creativecloud/revealing-the-next-wave-of-innovation-in-pro-video-ap ps/?sdid=KLCUB&PID=3515632
Let me know if you have questions.
Thanks,
Kevin

Congratulations on a significant amount of development.
Not sure yet which ones I would consider "best for me".
Maybe Masking , definitely SG Scope, Master Clip Function.......
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativecloud/cc/pd fs/nab2014-reveal-whats-new-for-pre-release-20140321.pdf?sdid=KLBWR

Sneak peek: the next version of DW

Alejandro Guttierez shows off one of the main new features in the next version of Dreamweaver.
http://blogs.adobe.com/dreamweaver/2013/04/nextgendreamweaver.html
By the way, if you plan to attend Adobe MAX, I am presenting a 90-minute hands-on lab diving into the detail of how to use the new CSS Designer panel. The lab will be presented twice at 2.45pm on Monday, 6 May, and at 11am on Wednesday, 8 May.
The blog post also confirms what I have suspected for a long time: server behaviors will be removed from the next version. They'll still be available as an extension, so existing users aren't left in the lurch. But the message is clear: start thinking of alternatives.

David_Powers wrote:
osgood_ wrote:
Just removing the server behaviours without replacing them with something more up-to-date its NOT very forward thinking of Adobe. The server behaviours IS or WAS a massive reason to use Dreamweaver.
I have no idea whether Adobe plans to replace server behaviors with something more up to date. What I do know is that the forum dedicated to developing server-side applications in Dreamweaver has become less and less active in the past year or so. Maybe that's because people who don't want to write their own code rely on the more sophisticated offerings of extension developers, such as WebAssist and DMX Zone, who have their own forums. However, if I used those extensions my main concern would be that, as far as I know, they're dependent on the deprecated mysql functions.
Working with a database doesn't necessarily involve writing a lot of code. There are several powerful PHP frameworks, all of them free, that do all the hard lifting for you. When I wrote Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 with PHP: Training from the Source, only one chapter was devoted to using server behaviors. The book was published by Adobe Press, and with Adobe's full knowledge and approval, it concentrated on using Zend Framework 1. It also showed how to use WordPress in Dreamweaver. I think the rise of WordPress played a similar role in the fate of server behaviors as jQuery played in the decision to cease investing in Spry.
If WordPress is too much like a sledgehammer, an alternative is Perch. It's not free, and it requires a separate licence for each website, but it has an excellent reputation. It's developed and maintained by Drew McLellan and his wife, Rachel Andrew, two very talented web developers (they're Brits, too). I don't have any affiliation with them. I've just heard lots of good things about them and Perch.
Sure David I hear what you're saying BUT Wordpress is too clumsy for the client to use simply. It's far too easy to add a myriad of extentions which could break the website design. Every time Wordpress is released you need to upgrade with it. It has security risks as far as I know. It's certainly not soemthing that I would touch after having given it a run out, several times. The whole package is really messy in my view and you're less in control of the process. Coding is King.
Yes, Perch is much better and simpler but is still quite restrictive, I've used that too. I've just finished a website which as far as I'm concerned required a bespoke CMS. Not only that if you write the code, or most of it, you have full control and knowledge in the event of something which stops working......at least I have a chance of sorting out the problem them. Totally relying on 3rd party products or extentions you have zero chance UNLESS you're some kind of code wizard which you arent going to be if youre using Wordpress or Perch.
I think the reason why there is less and less activity in the forum you mentioned is that many have moved away from using the DW server behaviours (php is the most popular server language by far) BUT Adobe have sat on their backside and missed the boat prefering to concentrate on rather lame updates.
I'm sure your right about WebAssist and DMX Zone whose extention MUST be compatibale with the Dreamweaver ones. I guess its over to them to come up with something that replaces the ones in Adobe as they themselves are highly unlikley to do it themselves.
For me its a question of I have now got to go and learn some of the new sqli which on the outset seems a lot more streamlined than the functional crap DW was writting anyway.

I want to know if the next version will siri Hebrew

I want to know if the next version will siri Hebrew?

I hope they also fix the bug of battery

When the next version of Symbian Belle will be r...

Plz will you tell me when the next version of Symbian Belle will be ready for updatibg Nokia E7? & the other smart phones,,,,,?
do you think this year 2011 or next year will be ready for update?
regards to all

Don´t know....but here is a review of Belle from GSM Arena today:
Symbian Belle
Nokia 808 again (delight Belle), Nokia E7 and X7 ( again, all on Delight Belle...after some time on Nokia Lumia 925 (retired), 1020 (not that great)and Lumia 820 (Replaced my router at home, great for internet sharing).., N9 The best device ever (use it as much as Lumia 1020), Nokia 700 (Sport Phone/My Love :-) ) Nokia 701, Nokia E6 (Should have a follow-up from Nokia among with larger screen, NFC, Autofocus), Lumia 800 (Retired After 6 weeks), -Sports Tracker-Nokia Internet Radio-Handy Safe-Skype-Bambuser-Screenshot app pro-fMobi-ComingNext-Manual TaskSwitcher-jagiTimer-Easy StopWatch-Boldbeast-Equalizer-Financial Calculator-WiMP Music-YTasks-Davi-Thumbnail Folders-BizCalendar-Tiny7-Situations-nn reeder-Sport Timer-CameraLover-CameraPro-GrabRadio-LiveScore-Poddi-Gravity-SkyFilesPro

Hello am using ios 7.0.4 I have a question about messages that it does not show the time of a particular message after first message that I recive form a paricular person so please in the next version change this and with every message show time and date

hello am using ios 7.0.4 I have a question about messages that it does not show the time of a particular message after first message that I recive form a paricular person so please in the next version change this and with every message show time and date

Hi,
How is everything going? Have you checked this issue from OWA? If so, please let me know the result.
In adition, please also try to use the following powershell commands to check if the assistant has right permissions:
Get-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity
CEO’s email address:\Calendar -User assistant’s email address
Also check with:
Get-Mailbox -Identity CEO’s mailbox
| fl *GrantSendOnBehalfTo
Please let me know the result.
Best Regards,
Steve Fan
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here

Where dos "Oracle Business Component Browser" go in the next Version ?

Hello "Oracle"
I am asking you about the BC4J "test-browser", will this go further in the next versions ?
If yes, can you tell in wath direction and in wath timeframe ?
If you do not want to make this "public" please let me also know.
Tanks
Christian

Hi Laura
I am very interested at a "suffisticated" UI-Browser for the BC4J View-Objects.
The idea is, that I not have to program a UI-Object the present the data to the User. Also that this UI-Browser dos support many presentation technologies (like Java-Application, JSP (Servlet), XML/XSL etc.).
I will not define for each view-object a UI-object, I like to define one UI-Object for all view-objects in my project.
What you think, will there be a effor, in your team, in that direction? Or do I have to program this UI-Browser by myself? Or do you know someone witch has allready designed a Browser like that?
Christian
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JDev Team (Laura):
Christian,
Our 3.2 release is due out in late November and there are some bugfixes for the tester included. The tester is basically a Java Application that uses the Data Aware Controls that we include with JDeveloper (InfoProducer and InfoSwing components on the Component Palette).
In the 3.2 release, the source for this application is included so users can see how it is implemented and make changes if they like.
The basic function of the tester is to provide users with a UI to try out their business logic code without having to generate their own UI.
Is there a specific area of functionality you are interested in?
Laura<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

What's going to happen to all the iWeb hacks when the next version comes?

When I refer to iWeb hacks in the title, I'm thinking of non-Apple software like "iWebsites" and "iWebenhancer".
From reading this forum, I've already learned how to have multiple websites on iWeb by duplicating and copying the domain file to different folders in my computer, where I work on different websites separately.
Now, I am thinking of getting "iWebenhancer" because I want to paste in some things, like "google adsense" and "youtube"/"Revver" video clips into my sites. HOWEVER, I am worried that all my hard work on my iWeb sites is going to get thrown out-of-wack when the next version of iWeb comes out early next year with iLife 2007 (I am presuming it will be released).
What do other forum users think? I know it can be only speculation now, but still I'm curious to know if anyone else is pondering this.

All of what you are saying is certainly possible. The next version of iWeb could potentially make all the workarounds that we do to edit HTML obsolete. To be sure, this is a net positive. But for those of us with more complex and more "post-processing" heavy sites, it will probably mean that we need to make some changes.
From a purely speculative viewpoint, I'm going to guess that the next version of iWeb will make adding external HTML snippets via post-publishing unnecessary. This would probably mean that we will be able to put whatever code we want to add right into the iWeb workspace....maybe somewhat akin to how iWebEnhancer works....but all built into iWeb. So as far as retooling our websites, this would simply require a one-time "put all your external code into iWeb and make sure it works" overhaul.
And I'm going to further speculate that the next version of iWeb may present us with many more desireable features....some that may make us want to abandon the way we do things now and possibly also abandon the very things that we strive to add to our sites today.... I'm thinking about more dynamic content with more user-interactivity. My point here is only that we might not mind the chance to overhaul our sites too much once we see the new features available to us.
Maybe I'm hoping for too much, though. I don't know. Your guess is as good as mine.

Can the next version please allow for the line height to be zero in a text box? I can only go down to .01?

I want to create a flipping calendar. I had this brilliant idea of putting each date 01 02 03, etc in one text box, with a hard return in between, and then set the line height to zero. Then set the type to appear one paragraph at a time. It would eliminate 20 animation steps. It worked beautifully except that I can't get the line height to set to zero. It will only go to .01. Bleh!
So please, Can the next version allow for the line height to be zero in a text box?
Also, separate timelines would be nice instead of one long string so it would be easier to have more than one animation happening at once.
Just a thought.
PS - I also noticed it would be nice to have the option of having the first line in a text box dissappear or dissolve or flip out before the next one comes in, rather than just each building in on top of each other.

In these forums you are just talking to users, not developers. To provide your feedback, in Keynote go to Keynote Menu>Provide Keynote Feedback and send your request that way.

When i upgrade to the next version of firefox, all of the web sites i had pinned to firefox on the Windows 7 task bar disappear

I accept the offer to upgrade to the next version of Firefox

Did you check your security software (firewall)?
A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process.
See:
* [[Server not found]]
* [[Firewalls]]

Will the next version of elements contain green screen

Will the next version of photoshop elements contain green screen

Green screen exists in the combo (including the Premiere Elements video editor) but I’m not sure it’s needed in Photoshop Elements. It’s already possible to quickly select any solid color background.

When will you release the next version of Strobe? + Feature suggestions

Thanks for a really excellent,solid and well thought-through video player.
I'm just curious on when the next version will be released. What kind of features are planned? A public roadmap would be really nice to have when developing around this player.
My suggestions would be:
Simple JavaScript API
An optional loader graphic while the media element is being retrieved/determined. (Instead of the miss-aligned buttons and completely black screen)
Possibility for the user to retry playback if RTMP connection fails, (media element not found) instead of locking the player, currently forcing the user to reload the browser.
Remove the pause button on live streams and replace it with a stop button. (When DVR is not supported obviously)

Hi,
Thank you these great suggestions! We will definitely consider these for our future roadmap. A couple quick answers to your questions:
We are shooting to release the next version (v1.5) of Strobe Media Playback (SMP) in December.
One of the key features of SMP 1.5 is a JavaScript API for creating player controls. We've actually just released a sprint drop that includes this feature, and the source can be downloaded here and the specification can be found here.
Some of the other planned features for SMP 1.5 include Multicast support and an HTML5 fallback engine. (Please note that these are just planned and not committed features.)
We have just added support for an FMS 3.5.3 feature called Stream Reconnect to OSMF 1.5 (release currently scheduled for early November). In the event of a network connection loss, this allows the player to continue to play out the buffer while it attempts to reconnect to the network. Would this suit your needs? We will likely eventually add this to SMP as well.
Any other questions or feedback, please let me know.
Thanks!
Cathi
Product Manager, OSMF and Strobe Media Playback

Hi sir i have revoked the distribution certificate , and in one of my iPhone app i had used the same certificate if i will upload the next version of same app then will it create any problem or with the new certificate i can upload my next version of myap

hi sir i have revoked the distribution certificate , and in one of my iPhone app i had used the same certificate if i will upload the next version of same app then will it create any problem or with the new certificate i can upload my next version of myapp or not plz tell me as soon as possible

Sounds like you need to ask your question in the developers forums.

The next version of TES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for