The Perfect I/O Card for CS3

As I mentioned earlier, all I miss from my capture card days (Pinnacle DV-500 and Matrox RTX10) is the ability to have a global Input/Output (I/O) solution built into the Premiere application. The downside, as several posters have mentioned, of the Matrox capture cards (also I/O devices) is these things cause all sorts of problems and crashes -- probably because they are trying to do too much at once. My problems stopped when I removed my Matrox card (and smashed it with a hammer). That said, I never had any problems with my Pinnacle DV-500 capture card when running with Premiere 6.0 and 6.5 so it IS entirely possible for a capture card to actually work.
Thus, I wish Adobe would either put out their own capture card or team-up with a better manufacturer -- and get serious about I/O in their this or next edition. One no longer needs to process on a capture card as the computer's CPU now has enough power to do the job -- especially the Quad processor which seems to work well with CS3.
Getting back to I/O -- all Adobe would have to do is sell, or get someone to sell, a compact simple card that had just the following I/O ports:
A. Firewire I/O port (1)
B. S-video I/O port (2)
C. 2-channel Audio I/O (4)
Forget the usual composite ports, they take up too much room. S-video is better anyway and most analog tape/DVD machines have S-video anyway. Thus A - C would total only seven ports (1+2+4) and these seven ports would be compact enough to put on one card -- thus no "break out box" would be necessary to add expense to the device. This would give all the necessary ports to handle digital and analog I/O and again, no processing (or processor fan) would be needed, thus reducing cost of manufacturing.
I don't know about you, but I still have a LOT of analog footage to digitize as I have been shooting (2-inch, 1-inch, 3/4-inch, beta, VHS) video since about 1978. Thus I really need reliable, easy to use, analog I/O and I imagine any professional, who has been in the business for a while, has lots of analog footage in their library. With the price of STOCK footage these days, I'm not about to forgo my library just because it analog. In many cases, my analog footage actually looks better than my digital footage as the analog footage often acquires a "film look" as it ages.
So I BEG Adobe (or one of their reliable partners) to put out a cost-effective I/O card (less than $300) that has seven (7) lousy ports; does NO processing and WORKS internally with CS3 with NO conflicts. That would really be the ticket(1)
James Jaeger
(1) For those of you will say: "Just purchase a converter box and it will do all of the stuff you require above." I already have purchased two (2) converter boxes and I am not entirely happy with them. First of all they do NOT put ALL of the I/O controls INSIDE Premiere CS3 as the capture card/software "solutions" do. Second, these converter boxes are temperamental. They often take time to "find" their connections and often one has to jerry-rig their computer and peripherals to make them perform. For instance, I am currently using the Canopus Grassvalley converter box and this thing will NOT convert data from the computers firewire port into analog data for, say, an external NTSC monitor. Instead, I have to take the computer's firewire output into the firewire port on a digital camera and then come OUT of the cameras analog ports into the converter box and THEN out of the converter box to an NTSC monitor. Complete horse. There are other problems, but you get the idea.

The Xena 2K is dual link HD SDI 4:4:4... its the best you can get...
SDI is the way to go... there is an optional BOB that offers all sort of I/O connections

Similar Messages

  • Anyone know if After Effects supports the Navida GTX750 graphics card for ray-tracing?

    Anyone know if After Effects supports the Navida GTX750 graphics card for ray-tracing?

    All GPUs supported for GPU acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer are listed in the system requirements:
    System requirements | After Effects

  • Accelarate the Linux ATI Graphics card  for java Swing application

    Hi All,
    I am using a ATI Radeon 9550 Graphic card in LFS (Linux from the scratch) environment. I want to enable the OpenGL-based pipeline for Java Swing application. I tried the -Dsun.java2d.opengl=true . But the Java swing application getting very slow.
    How to overcome this problem?
    Any one give the procedure to Accelerate ATI graphics card for Java Swing Application
    How to verify Java swing use ATI graphics card ?
    Thanks in advance..
    Prabhu.S

    Hi All,
    I am using a ATI Radeon 9550 Graphic card in LFS (Linux from the scratch) environment. I want to enable the OpenGL-based pipeline for Java Swing application. I tried the -Dsun.java2d.opengl=true . But the Java swing application getting very slow.
    How to overcome this problem?
    Any one give the procedure to Accelerate ATI graphics card for Java Swing Application
    How to verify Java swing use ATI graphics card ?
    Thanks in advance..
    Prabhu.S

  • Moto G 2014 on Prepaid Plan? I want to switch to a Smartphone and try things out, but need a phone with 32GB of memory and the 2014 has a card for it. When will the Moto G 2014 version be available for Prepaid plans?

    I want to switch to a Smartphone and try things out, but need a phone with 32GB of memory and the G 2014 has a card for it.
    When will the Moto G 2014 version be available for Prepaid plans?

    You can buy Applecare anytime before the 1 year warranty expires, so you could leave that to his discretion if you wanted, and he'd have 1 year to consider it.
    You can save ~$30 on the mini if you qualify for an educational or corporate discount. Office 2004 costs ~$145 with educational discount.

  • The use only smart cards for several hundred users

    How can I assign soon as possible,
    use only the smart card for
    a few hundred users? I also have
    a group of people who would like to allow the use of
    a login and password, and smart card.
    Using GPO to the computer,
    will be applied to the station, and I would just like
    to the user. I know that
    the card user can select
    to use a smart card, but
    how to do it automatically for a group of people
    (several hunderd)?

    I would use LDAP query via GUI tools (like AD Administrative Console) or console tools (Active Directory PowerShell module) get target users by using some filter and enable smart card checkboxes. GPO cannot be used to make changes in AD.
    My weblog: en-us.sysadmins.lv
    PowerShell PKI Module: pspki.codeplex.com
    PowerShell Cmdlet Help Editor pscmdlethelpeditor.codeplex.com
    Check out new: SSL Certificate Verifier
    Check out new:
    PowerShell FCIV tool.

  • What's the perfect new-MBP configuration for Logic?

    I hope this isn't a troll.  I've been waiting, waiting WAITING for the "refresh" of the MacBook Pro (MBP) to come out so I can solve a few performance problems (including my use of Logic which really requires it to be on one of those laptop fan-stands to keep it cool).  The good news?  The "refresh" is out.  The bad news, there is a huge choice -- old-style MBP or retina-display MBP?
    I think I've concluded that "old style" is the way to go -- I like to repair/upgrade my machines too much to give that option up.  So now I'm working on what to put in it.  Hence this post.  Given your experiences, what would you stick in the "perfect" old-style MBP if you were in my shoes?  Here's what I'm leaning towards.
    -- Max out the non-upgradeable stuff when I buy the machine -- so...
       -- 2.7 GHz processor
       -- Hi-Res Anti-glare screen
    -- Minimize the "upgradeable" bits (since I'm going to replace them with aftermarket stuff)
       -- 750GB 5400 rpm disk drive
       -- Minimum memory
    -- Aftermarket upgrades
       -- Memory
       -- Disk drive
       -- Replace optical drive with a flash drive
    Questions:
    1) Memory upgrade -- any recommendations on memory that runs cooler than other types?  My current setup started running a bit hotter when I swapped in aftermarket memory.  I'd cheerfully buy Apple memory to avoid this problem, but maybe there's an aftermarket flavor that is equally good?
    2) Disk drive -- same thing, although I'm not cheerful about buying the Apple versions unless I absolutely have to.  Throughput is key, right?  Anything else I should be keeping an eye on?  Again, heat is something I'm trying to avoid.
    3) Optical drive -- I am massively confused on this one.  I understand the benefits to throughput (and perhaps heat).  But which things should go where?  OS and other "static" stuff (like application programs) on the flash drive (to avoid the finite-writes problem)?  So put Logic Pro and the sound files on the flash drive (I'm thinking that's what I'm going to do)?  Put project files there too?  Recommendations on brands?  Recommendations on optical-drive replacement kits?
    4) Anything else that *you're* doing to build your 2012 MBP for Logic?
    Sorry if this is a troll -- I tried to find this post on the list.  If there is one, just link me into the thread.  Thanks!

    The RME I use is so intuitive it knows knows my moods and often refuses to record as it knows I'm going to $uck so why bother.
    It also decides on which takes to keep.
    pancenter-
    p.s. MOTU stuff is solid and straightforward.

  • I was just denied the LG G4 gift card for my purchases.

    Hello, I had just purchased two LG G4's.
    I just called the 1888BESTBUY line and was told, when I asked when my 2 $100 gift card would arrive, that I do not qualify for it. I tried to explain the many posts here already about it, that I do qualify for purchsing an unactivated device, and was told there is nothing she can possibly do to help me get the card, and said I needed to post here if it is working for others.
    Really? Well, can someone help me what the terms and conditions say I should get?

    Greetings 6er,
    The LG G4 looks like an amazing phone and with this $100 gift card offer, I’m sure you were super excited to purchase these phones! I'm sorry you may not be aware of when you'll be receiving your $100 gift card, and for any misinformation you may have been provided when you inquired about them.
    While in store purchases of the LG G4 would receive the gift card at the time of purchase, unfortunately online orders take longer to process and receive the gift card. You should be receiving the gift cards within 14 business days of your orders. If you should not receive the gift cards by the 15th business day, please don't hesitate in reaching out to me so that I may look further into this!
    If you should have any questions, please let us know.  
    Sincerely, 
    Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • What happened to the 8800 GT upgrade cards for the first-gen Mac Pro?

    I have a first-gen Mac Pro (System Profiler says model identifier is "MacPro2,1" which I think still makes it a first-gen model), and I was considering upgrading to the 8800 GT so I could take advantage of OpenCL, since the 7300 GT I have is not supported, according to Apple's page. ( http://www.apple.com/macosx/specs.html )
    However, I can't seem to find the card anywhere on Apple's store site, or anywhere else, for that matter. Does anyone know what happened? Can I still buy the 8800 GT for my Mac Pro? If not, what OpenCL-compatible card can I upgrade to? Apple only seems to have the ATI X1900 XT in their store.
    Thanks in advance for any advice!

    {quote:title=Malcolm Rayfield wrote:}
    ATI Radeon HD 4870 (Despite what Apple says, it works in any Mac Pro.)
    <http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB999ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=NDE4NDMxOA>
    Have you done it, or know someone that has put it in a 1st gen Mac Pro?
    I'm just double checking so I don't waste my time.
    Message was edited by: JeffDM2

  • THE PERFECT Stereo Bluetooth HEADSET for my E51

    My E51 is in dire need of GREAT BLUETOOTH STEREO HEADPHONES. As u may know, the OEM headset simply sucks in terms of sound quality and comfort (keeps dropping off).
    Please share ur experience in using stereo bluetooth headsets that PAIR SEAMLESSLY to Nokia E51 with rating on:
    - Comfort in using (> 2 hours non stop)
    - Pairing ease & range
    - Musical sound quality (bass treble richness)
    - Conversation sound quality and clarity (inc. talk time)
    - Model (in ear, earbud etc)
    - Price (pref in USD currency)
    I think this post should be kept ALIVE as referral for future users who are thinking the same as I am now
    PEACE!
    Message Edited by e51lover on 31-Jan-2008 02:54 AM

    There isn't any - iPhone simply don't work proberly with a bluetooth headset.

  • HT3702 I am trying to support my number on the back of my card for APPLe tV   WHICH TOLD ME TO GET ON iTUNES FOR HELP

    How do I get apple tc to accept my verification number on the back of the card already singed on

    You need to sign into your ACCOUNT, either on a desktop or iOS device. When viewing your biling info, put your CVV number in the red box.

  • Better video cards for the new 8-core Mac Pro...?

    I don't know a ton about video cards. I did some research and the internet says that the Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 video card is the best card out right now. Will it work in the 8-core macpro? If not, or if it's not the best, what is the best video card that will work in the 8-core macpro?
    P.S.
    Does anyone know how to tell exactly whether a video card is better from another? I mean I can guess a video card at 1792MB is going to be better then one at 512MB, but I've also heard that, for example, the ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB is better then the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB, and apple charges more for it so it probably is better, but all that tells me is the name of the cards, and that they are both at 512MB, so from that without any other information I would assume they're exactly the same just made by different companies, but there must be some other details that would explain why it's better right? Thanks in advance

    Well I found out the Quadro FX 4800 works on it, that looks pretty good.
    It's a good card, but it has a different application focus.
    What applications do you use?
    Answering that helps determine what the best card is.
    The 5800 is better though, will it work?
    Better, how?
    The spec's read better?
    How about real world performance?
    Benchmarks?
    They are very similar in shape and such.
    Shape has little to do with anything.
    The ROM is the key.
    If the card is not produced as "OS X compatible", it does not have Mac ROM and cannot be used.
    If there is a Mac edition that is similar (same GPU series, similar architecture) the ROM may be flashed to Mac ROM.
    Especially in Geforce cards, the ability to edit ROMs and even write portions of the ROM is necessary to be able to flash a card.
    Even then, no guarantees.
    Often a port on a flashed card won't work after flashing.
    Seems the 5800 has a 10 bit display port, so if the card were flashable, the display port wouldn't work.
    The ROM chip size of a card is also of concern.
    Many cards require either a new, larger ROM chip to accept the Mac ROM (soldering), or, require a hacked, "reduced" ROM to be written to allow flash.
    Invariably, there will be some feature loss with a reduced ROM, but a good hacker usually gets rid of superfluous stuff.
    Cards with more VRAM than the Mac counterpart will often times lose the extra VRAM- it won't be read by OS X.
    Then there is the EFI question, which often creates a final stumbling block for converting a card.
    There are many pioneers who flash cards.
    If a card is flashable, it has already been done.
    The Quadro 4500, 4800, and 5600 have all been worked out.
    As of yet, the 5800 hasn't been sussed out for flash (as far as I can find).
    Flashing the card is easy.
    Finding a physically compatible card and a compatible ROM are the hard parts.
    The two best retail cards for the Mac Pro are the Geforce GTX 285 and the Radeon HD 4870.

  • FCPX crashes all the time using the Intensity Pro Card for monitor preview wassup?

    I have been using FCPX for a few months and I like it somewhat and could really love it for it not crashing on all my projects. If I scrub the timeline or apply a filter it crashes. I'm using the Blackmagic Intensity Pro card for monitor output and the latest drivers that they put out and can't really get through a project because it crashes all the time.I thought that if i get a different display card it would possible help I have the GForce 120 card which only has 256MB ram.Can anybody put some light on the issue?

    FCP X currently does not support Intensity Pro cards.
    Andy

  • End of Upgrade Cycle for CS3 and CS4... Really Adobe?

    As if business wasn't bad enough now I see there will be no upgrade paths past december for CS3 and 4 users. Is this how Adobe plans to keep users away from stopping their upgrades and reducing the number of machines they run Adobe products on? I understand Adobe is not a non-profit and has has to turn a revenue, but the geniuses at Marketing here have made a huge mistake by basically telling their customers that what they have so far will be worth zilch in comes 2013. That arbitrary deadline, is not consider some people who on the east coast are now cash strapped as anyone having to choose between home repairs and other such marvelous stuff and upgrading to CS6 guess what they'll choose. And for the lucky ones not heavily affected by the storms, they will donate to help their community before they will spend money to upgrade perfectly good software.
    It wasn't enough that the upgrade path wasn't much of a discount, but in the current economy every penny counts! The choice of stopping support for CS3 and CS4 in my personal opinion an ill-advised move. I personally went from 3 to 4 within a short amount of time... then when 5 came out my budget didn't allow so I needed to wait. The new CS6 isn't direly needed so I decided I'd have to loose some additional "upgrade power" because money need to be directed elsewhere now... but the news that I'd loose all the upgrade power and would have kept on upgrading for nothing it's just ridiculous... and if that's the treatment a customer will have to expect from now on I think I'll use what I have and move to alternatives stopping to personally support Adobe products an rely on licensed copies at work instead. Perhaps Adobe hasn't notices we aren't exactly doing that great in US between the current economical situation, the various setbacks experienced across the country and for the fact that in this particular business most work is often being outsourced out of US these days... I am sure you will have a huge market on the countries where the outsourced work is being sent... as far as I am concerned comes 12/31/2013 I will no longer be an Adobe customer as Adobe is forcing me out of the upgrade cycle and I won't plan to re-enter anytime soon in the coming future... lesson learnt.
    Thank you for your time (if any of the marketing gurus will have cared to read this far without laughing and discounting with a "screw those old customers, they should've upgraded earlier" which was basically the content of the email I got this week... pasted below)
    Cheers,
    tfbkny
    Content of email received from Adobe saying last chance to upgrade now or what you got will be worthless in less than a couple months.
    Dear Creative Suite customer:
    We want to make sure you're aware of an important change to Adobe's upgrade policy that may affect you.
    Beginning January 1, 2013, only Creative Suite customers with licenses for CS5 or CS5.5 versions will qualify for upgrade pricing to CS6.
    Due to this change, we will only continue offering CS3 and CS4 customers like you special upgrade pricing through December 31, 2012.*
    * Owners of CS3 and CS4 individual products and suite editions will be eligible to receive upgrade pricing to CS6 until December 31, 2012. After that date, only customers on CS5 or CS5.5 will qualify for upgrade pricing to CS6.

    Adobe doesn't care, they don't have to. I like Phsotoshop and have been using it professionally for 20 years, but lets face it, I wouldnt mind some really good competition from another source. It didnt use to be the only game in town, and doesnt have to remain so.
    I could brainstorm how I would want competing software to look like. Pshop is not the easiest workflow possible. Illustrator is clearly deficient to even CorelDraw, and certainly Freehand. I've been meaning to reconnect with CorelDraw. It did some cool things.
    Google Chrome is pulling a lot of manoevers software wise and I hope they try to go a little deeper and give Adobe a run for their money on the one program they feel justifies unbelievable gouging. Go investigate Ableton Live if you want to see what a company that cares about its customers is doing, ADOBE. Audition is a JOKE compared to Ableton Live. Thank God we're not powned on the audio side by these suits.
    The idea that a company would peddle buggy software, which CS4 was..., although some of that was Apple's fault, is bad, the upgrade prices were ridiculous, and this is the end of the road for me currently. The idea that a company would actively
    push away customers is pretty incredible. "But I sent you an email!" Whoops, you gotta pay $1900 for production premium CS6! HAHAHAHAHA. Time for a YT video with my old hard copy box. Sounds like a good idea.
    There are too many options on the motion graphics side, and I'll keep a static machine to run Pshop and AE CS4.
    The masters of the universe will have theit way, and the rest must bow to their ambivalent greed. At least that's the way they think. It would seem that Adobe and Apple really, really want some upstarts to come up. Maybe $360 for a year to figure out an exit might work. It will be interesting to see if this hits earnings. VERY interesting.

  • Best Video Card for non 3d/compositing work in Premiere CS4?

    Hi all, I'm looking to optimize my system where I can to speed up the editing process. I edit 1080p footage from the Canon 5D MKII (h.264 MOV files)using half-res h.264 proxies, but CS4 seems to hang a lot in the timeline view and clips just disappear and instead show green. I'm switching to half-res MPEG-2 (.m2v) proxies now and so far that problem seems to have gone away (still testing), but when timeline display quality is at "High Quality" (vs. automatic) there's still some chop during slow pans (not seen with "Automatic" or "Draft Quality").
    Anyway, I'm looking for the weakest point in my system and suspect the video card. My system is an 2.66 i7 processor, 6GB 1333 ram, 1x160GB sata II HD (OS/Apps), 3x1TB SATA II RAID 0 (paging file, data), and an $80 ATI 4650 512 MB video card running Vista 64.
    So all that said, what's the best general graphics card for editing HD video in Premiere CS4? I don't care about 3d or compositing at this stage, just basic editing of unrendered (timeline playback) HD video, maybe sometimes 1-3 HD layers, some basic color correction effects (b+w, contrast, etc), dissolves, text overlay, some clip speed manipulation.
    Many seem to recommend the Nvidia quadro cards, but I haven't found any information to suggest they help with anything other than 3D/compositing, which I don't need (and therefore don't need to pay the premium).
    There's also the Nvidia CX card, but it's main feature is touted as encoding h.264, whereas I could care less about that and ideally need decoding of h.264 in the timeline to be better. I haven't seen any great reviews on this card of heard of average user testimonials, probably because it's $2k and it mainly marketed as "zoom more fluidly in photoshop, export h.264 4x faster", which seem like minor issues vs. "better realtime playback of HD video".
    I sort of rambled, but if any informed CS4 users can help answer the question regarding the best video card for general CS4 editing use (not 3d/compositing stuff) I'd love to get more insight.

    So in Media Encoder CS4, I tried encoding one of the clips that plays back the least smooth in the Premiere timeline (a slow pan across intricate patterns on a sand dune in death valley) to the following:
    Format: P2 Movie, Preset: DVCPRO HD 720P 30
    (this was the only format in media encoder that mentions DVCPRO HD)
    I noticed when trying to customize the setting, that there is no 30 fps option, just 23.976, 29.97, and 59.94. I just went with 29.97 as that was the closest to the 30 fps of the source MK II footage. The width and height were also unajustable at 960x720 for the DVCPRO HD format.
    Playing the output in the timeline view of Premiere was comparable in smoothness to the m2v file. I looked at my resource monitor during playback looking for bottlenecks, and the CPU does seem to spike at 100% initially when playing this clip back. I reverted to the m2v version and also saw the same CPU spike. I also reverted back to the down-res'd mp4 version, same spike. Moving display quality down to draft does allow for smooth playback here.
    So I guess there's something about this clip that is CPU intensive to play back in the timeline in any of these formats. The original 1080p version plays back perfectly in both quicktime and VLC player.
    Anyway, for now I think I'm content with using the m2v proxies as a big chunk of the clips are fairly smooth, and using a reduced quality display mode for clips that don't play as smoothly is accpeptable for now. At least so far I'm not seeing the hanging/video not displaying (and instead showing a green screen) that I was with the mp4 proxies.
    If anyone has any other suggestions as to how to get smoother timeline playback for these proxies (or the original h.264 .MOV files), however, whether it be a hardware upgrade (e.g. better video card) or a different proxy codec, I'd love to hear them and give it a shot.

  • One card for OSX and one for windows...

    OK, I've been following the ongoing debate regarding the choice of graphics cards for the Mac Pro. I think saying that it's limited would be putting it mildly.
    Now, I really wish for a few more horsepower for when I'm playing Warcraft in Bootcamp but I really don't want to fork out £270 for the 1900XT just for apple to come along and update the range in x months and as I only really need the extra oomph in windows I wouldnt really see any benefit in OSX from the new card. Some people have touched on the idea of perhaps using a seperate card for when using windows. This would be great as I can get a better card for use in windows for a fraction of the price of a new apple card. What are the pro's and con's of doing this? Would the non-apple card confuse OSX and vica-versa would windows see both cards? Would I need to specify in windows which card I want to use? Would I have to remove a card each time I booted in the 'other' OS?
    Educate me a little please :O)
    Mac Pro 2.66GHz / iMac DV Graphite Edition / Colour Classic   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    I left WoW with over 200 days played and moved from a G4 to a Mac Pro with a 1900 during that time. I also ended up having my x1900 card replaced by Apple. According to many sources there is now a Rev2 card being shipped. I can't confirm it but I can confirm that fewer people seem to be having problems, and if you use SMC FanControl while playing WoW it will keep things cool and you'll be assured of no over heating issues. Personally I would not be concerned if I used SMC Fan Control, and in fact after getting the new card and beginning to use SMC Fan Control I had no further issues of any kind. The issue was with overheating. WoW runs just fine in OSX using the x1900 card. FPS over 100 is not uncommon and even in the Suppression room in BWL (still the most intense graphic area I can recall...nothing like it in Kara or anywhere else I've seen in the new content) I'd get 40-80fps. It's no SLI super high end, but very, very playable with a Mac Pro.
    My buddy came over the other day to use my WiFi for a battle with our guild in Karazhan. I felt like a crack wh_ore next to a pipe out of reach....

Maybe you are looking for