The problem about  integrate  Portal and R/3

Hi everyone :
   We want to achieve that our vendor can query R/3 report via our Portal. I had done SSO configuration.
   But we had about 500 vendors, it is impossible that we create 500 R/3 users for our vendors,  because the cost is too much .
   And there is another problem, vendor who had the authorization to query report can query the other vendor's data at same time. But we expect that certain vendor can query his data only.
   I think this is a general problem when integrate Portal and R/3, BW .
   Is there somebody had solved this problem or give any advice?
   Any discuss is welcome.
Best Regards,
Jianguo Chen

Hi,
I would say: get in contact with your SAP account manager anc check which options SAP can offer you...
Normally every user using a R/3 system has to have a valid user license in that system. Expecially when you want to access control to data on user (vendor) level you nedd to identifiy the user clearly and uniquely which by standard means you need a user for every vendor.
Hth,
Michael

Similar Messages

  • The problem about  integrate  Portal and R/3 : vendor query report problem

    Hi everyone :
       We want to achieve that our vendor can query R/3 report via our Portal. I had done SSO configuration.
       But we had about 500 vendors, it is impossible that we create 500 R/3 users for our vendors,  because the cost is too much .
       And there is another problem, vendor who had the authorization to query report can query the other vendor's data at same time. But we expect that certain vendor can query his data only.
       I think this is a general problem when integrate Portal and R/3, BW .
       Is there somebody had solved this problem or give any advice?
       Any discuss is welcome.
    Best Regards,
    Jianguo Chen

    Hi,
    I would say: get in contact with your SAP account manager anc check which options SAP can offer you...
    Normally every user using a R/3 system has to have a valid user license in that system. Expecially when you want to access control to data on user (vendor) level you nedd to identifiy the user clearly and uniquely which by standard means you need a user for every vendor.
    Hth,
    Michael

  • When I try to make a new video, a window comes up that says,"The operation could not be completed," and then under it, it says,"No other information is available about the problem," what is happening and how do I fix it?

    when I try to make a new video, a window comes up that says,"The operation could not be completed," and then under it, it says,"No other information is available about the problem," what is happening and how do I fix it?

    Hi
    And without info - it's near to impossibly to help. Try my general troubleshooting note:
    Troubleshooting note
    When iMovie doesn't work as intended this can be due to a lot of reasons
    iMovie Pref files got corrupted - trash it/they and iMovie makes new and error free one's
    problem in iMovie Cache folder - trash Cache.mov and Cache.plist
    Creating a new User-Account and log into this
    This forces iMovie to create all pref. and cache files new and error free
    Event or Project got corrupted - try to make a copy and repair
    a Codec is used that doesn't work (even though iMovie and/or iDVD tries to / they fail in the end)
    version miss match of QuickTime Player / iMovie / iDVD
    preferences are wrong - Repair Preferences
    other hard disk problem - Repair Hard Disk (Disk Util tool - but start Mac from ext HD or DVD)
    External hard disks - MUST BE - Mac OS Extended (hfs) formatted to work with Video
    ( UNIX/DOS/FAT32/Mac OS Exchange - works for most other things - but not for Video )
    USB-flash-memories - usually do not work
    Net-work connected hard disks - usually do not work (most often not fast enough and WRONGLY FORMATTES as DOS etc)
    iPhoto Library got problems - let iPhoto select another one or repair it. Re-build this first then try to re-start iMovie. When iMovie starts-up it first look trough this iPhoto library and if faulty it all Halt’s.
    This You do by
    First -  close iPhoto
    Secondly - on start up of iPhoto - Keep {cmd and alt-keys down}
    Thirdly - now select all five options presented
    THEN - WAIT a long long time (>20 hours are not strange)
    free space on Start-Up (Mac OS) hard disk to low (<1Gb) - I never go under 25Gb free space for SD-Video (4-5 times more for HD)
    external devices interferes - turn off Mac - disconnect all of them and - Start up again and re-try
    GarageBand fix - start GB - play a few notes - Close it again and now try iMovie
    Screen must be set to million-colors
    Third-party plug-ins doesn't work OK
    Run "Cache Out X", clear out all caches and restarts the Mac
    Let Your Mac be turned on during one night. At about midnight there is a set of maintenance programs that runs and tidying up. This might help
    Turn off Your Mac - and disconnect Mains - for about 20-30 minutes - at least this resets the FireWire port.
    In QuickTime - DivX, 3ivx codec, Flip4Mac, Perian etc - might be problematic - temporarily move them out and re-try
    (I deleted the file "3ivxVideoCodec.component" located in Mac HD/Library/Quicktime and this resolved my issue.)
    buenrodri wrote
    I solved the problem by removing the file: 3ivxVideoCodec.component. after that, up-dated iMovie runs ok.
    Last resort: Trash all of iMovie and re-install it
    Yours Bengt W

  • Hello apple I have the problem with my iPhone and my friends have this problem too. My iPhone have the problem about calling and answer the call. When I use my iPhone to call I can't hear anything from my iPhone but the person that I call can answer it bu

    Hello apple
    I have the problem with my iPhone and my friends have this problem too.
    My iPhone have the problem about calling and answer the call. When I use my iPhone to call I can't hear anything from my iPhone but the person that I call can answer it but when answer both of us can't hear anything and when I put my iPhone to my face the screen is still on and when I quit the phone application and open it again it will automatic call my recent call. And when my friends call me my iPhone didn't show anything even the missed call I'm only know that I missed the call from messages from carrier. Please check these problem I restored my iPhone for 4 time now in this week. I lived in Hatyai, Songkhla,Thailand and many people in my city have this problem.
    Who have this problem??

    Apple isnt here. this is a user based forum for technical questions. The solution is to restart, reset, and restore as new which is in the manual after that get it replaced for hard ware failure. if your within your one year warranty its replaced if it is out of the warranty then it is 199$

  • When I have video clips on my timeline, they do not play in the monitor screen. I hear the sound track but can not see the image. To test if my new files are somehow the problem, I went back and used video files that I used successfully a year ago, and th

    When I have video clips on my timeline, they do not play in the monitor screen. I hear the sound track but can not see the image. To test if my new files are somehow the problem, I went back and used video files that I used successfully a year ago, and they no longer play in the monitor window. I hear the sound track, but do not see any video. Have I changed some setting that controls video playback in the monitor window?

    Randy Ruttger
    Thanks for the follow up.
    Missing in this equation were the version of Premiere Elements that you were using and the computer operating system on which it was running. But...
    The deed is done. But.....Until now and after you went ahead and moved to version 12, we now learn what version of Premiere Elements you were using. We still do not know the computer operating system involved.
    You just said Premiere Elements 10. Premiere Elements 10 is hit by a serious known display issue if the computer uses a NVIDIA GeForce video card/graphics card. In this issue, the only remedy is to roll back the driver version to about May 2013. The description of the problem and how to do the roll back are described in one of the Announcements at the top of this forum. What video card/graphics card does your computer use?
    On another front, Adobe will be releasing a new version of Premiere Elements any day now. No one but Adobe knows the feature set for the new version. That type of information is announced at the moment of release of the new version.
    So the remedy to the problem that you presented in this thread could have been...
    1. Rolling back the NVIDIA GeForce driver version to about May 2013 if possible (Windows 8 or 8.1 64 bit, may not be possible)
    2. Move to another version of Premiere Elements (which you did)
    I offer the above for consideration so that you can review your decisions. We are pleased to learn that Premiere Elements 12/12.1 works for you.
    Please do not hesitate to ask questions and ask for clarifications, but remember that the answers are in the details.
    Best wishes,
    ATR

  • I've got the problem about sharing the screen

    Hi, i bought iMac 21.5 (Late 2013), i'v upgraded it to the Mavericks. I've got the problem about sharing the display, i have thunderbolt to hdmi adapter and while i plug it to my TV, it doesn't work, it has no signal on TV, can someone help me ?? Thank Yo

    Hello Gukakila
    Start your troubleshooting with the article below. Try out the cable on a different tv or monitor to see if it shows up there. You may also need to reset the SMC and Parameter Ram.
    Apple computers: Troubleshooting issues with video on internal or external displays
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1573
    Regards,
    -Norm G.

  • Why is Apple so bad at providing customers with information on what the problem with email is and what they are doing to fix it?

    Why is apple not providing information on what the problem withe email is and what they are doing to fix, along with a time frame for fixing the problem.

    It was because the problem was major.  If you do not know tech, you should know that a two day outage usually indicates some type of virus, hack, or a bad software load that they had to unravel.  The common way to solve that is to rebuild servers and put back into service.  That takes time.
    Apple did not want to admit this problem.  My guess at this stange was that they loaded new software that might be associated with the new IOS and it crashed.  To reveal this would be to cast into doubt their future revenue.
    Either way.  Run do not walk away from Icloud products and services.  Apple has demonstrated they can not be a business partner.

  • How you can solve a problem or find out on a dead pc if the problem relies on motherboard and not on processor or vice versa

    hi.
    I am working myself with computers ,  so there is one thing in my mind I wanted to be sure,which I couldn't find an answer for it!
    because I had before totally black screen and the problem was damaged processor.
    I am wondering how I can be sure as the last option when I get a black screen and there is no lihgts at all no any LED is lighting.totally dead pc.
    how  you can be sure then that the problem relies on processor and not on motherboard or vice versa the problem relies on motherboard and not on processor
      because I can't say to the customer lets buy first a processor if it is the cause of dead PC and if not then we buy motherboard. this sounds not wise.
    so I experimented first with my latop ,I pulled out the processor to see if I can see any LED light or any movement on the motherboard to be sure that motherboard giving me some clue that it is healty. I gave some light heat to de fan to let it turn ,because 
    it is working with heat sensors then I know that the motherboard is healty. but it didn't work. 
    I did the same with my desktop computer and the result is the same no any lights and no any movement on the motherboard . so now can some one tell me how you can distuingish as a last result which of this 2 components is causing dead PC. is there any
    tool to test the motherboard or how asus,dell ect. they solve such a problem if the customer send to them a dead pc.
    I know that the power supply also can cause dead pc but I know how to solve a problem  with dead power supply. and I want to keep away power supply from this question. please do not tell me that  Idon't have to pull out processor
    because I am a technician and both of my computers are doing very good after this experiment.
    thanks
    johan
    h.david

    Usually if you have some kind of hardware failure there is some beeping during POST or most motherboards now have LED indicators to produce and error message based on the type of failure
    So if its bad memory, not place properly, mismatched, processor not inserted properly, mismatched voltage or voltage connector not present etc it beeps or generates the error id.
    Power supplies can be tested for failure. There are some walk throughs for testing just them with a switch, paperclip or a jumper (I'd suggest not doing this if you are not familiar with the dangers of electricity).
    Memory can be tested with memory diagnostics programs like Memtest+
    Processors can overheat if the proper precautions have not been taken usually you will get a POST beep or error code for that.
    If the motherboard has no response then do the basics first:
    Check power connectors and power supply. Once you determine that is not the case move on to other items like graphics cards in all the way or memory.

  • Computer iMac7,1 has been giving sundry problems for some time. Within the last six weeks I have reinstalled the OS (Snow Leopard), without affecting the overall contents of the hard drive. ±3 weeks later the problems became more serious and I again reins

    Computer iMac7,1 has been giving sundry problems for sometime. Within the last six weeks I have reinstalled the OS (Snow Leopard),without affecting the overall contents of the hard drive.
    ±3 weeks later the problems became more serious and I againreinstalled the OS and installed OS 6.6.7 from the internet.
    I used the option to restore from the external backup driveand went back some time as it was my intention to reinstall individualcomponent in an attempt to find out where the problem might lie. This hasintroduced an entirely new problem! If I open Time Machine from the desktop itappears that all backups from late 2009 to June 2011 are intact. But, in thiscase there are none of the restore functions &c on screen. The latter areonly shown if Time Machine is opened from the menu bar or from the dock but, inthis case, available are only backups in late 2009!
    I also opened the Apple Hardware Test in an attempt toestablish the nature of the problem. The ‘quick’ version said there’s nothingwrong; the more detailed one reported “Error detected, 4HD/11/40000004.” I haveagain tried to employ this test but nothing I do can induce it to open!!!
    What to do? I need help urgently and would appreciate anyadvice that offers solutions to the problem.

    To check your S.M.A.R.T status open disk utility and click on your drive and then click on the info icon.

  • What is the problem in my account I could not download from the store, whether programs are free or non-free I hope you fix the problem or Chrho me and I repaired the problem

    What is the problem in my account I could not download from the store, whether programs are free or non-free I hope you fix the problem or Chrho me and I repaired the problem
    thank you...

    Nobody here can fix your problem, we do not work for Apple. And I have no idea what "Chrho" means. Neither does Google.
    So - exactly what happens when you try to download a program? And from where are you trying to download it?

  • Question About OAS Portal and the DB conections

    Hi,
    I 'm getting a lot of problems with the portal I'm creating, sometimes my DB goes down
    with this error:
    Fallo de la llamada para ejecutar el origen de datos. [No se ha podido establecer la conexión.
    This line in english says something like:
    Fail calling to execute data. [ It was not possible to stablish the connection
    [Listener refused the connection with the following error: ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found The Connection descriptor used by the client was: desarrollo06:1521:infra ]so I have to but down all the services and then put them up again, including the DB, so everything works well again.
    I want to know:
    - How many omniportlets, or conections to the database Can handle the OAS Portal??
    - Does the omniportlet closes the conection when it loaded the information?
    - Can there be a problem if I use many omniportlets (I mean if they don't close their conection?)???
    - And If so, how can i fix that??
    thanks in advance,
    aTTe:
    Blume

    hi Blume,
    1. the number of connections Portal handles with your db are setup in JDBC Connection Pool parameter.
    2. don't think so.
    3. I think, yeah, some of them will be expected behavior (eg, number of connections limit is exceeded) and some of them are due to some bugs (see answer 4.)
    4. there are a few bugs related to this connection problem in Portal 10.1.4.
    for instance, Check this note on Metalink (Doc ID:      394089.1) which says that:
    "OMNIPortlet uses connection object from the JDBC connection pool. When the database is restarted, the cached connection is invalid and the exception wasn't being caught."
    To fix that problem, you may need to apply a patch (Patch 5393955) on your portal midtier. You can get it from Metalink.
    5. btw, shutdown db may not be required to recover/restore connections; try simply restarting OC4J_Portal on AS Control Console.
    hope that helps!
    AMN

  • The problem about Secure Reliable Messaging between WCF and Weblogic

    I'm doing a project for testing the interoperability between WCF and Weblogic with secure reliable messaging.
    When WCF client talk to Weblogic service with Secure Reliable feature enabled.We got error when CreateSequence, the error message is below:
    The incoming message was signed with a token which was different from what used to encrypt the body. This was not expected.
    The remote endpoint requested an address for acknowledgements that is not the same as the address for application messages. The channel could not be opened because this is not supported. Ensure the endpoint address used to create the channel is identical to the one the remote endpoint was set up with.
    My understanding is that the client accepted the RSTR from weblogic (so both sides now share the secure conversation token) and moved on to CreateSequence (and failed due to config mismatches). But I don't how the error happen and how to get it fixed.
    -- below is the wsdl you are using --
    Any ideas about it?
    Thanks in advance!!!!!!
    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
    <WL5G3N4:definitions name="EchoStringSignOnly" targetNamespace="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns="" xmlns:WL5G3N0="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy" xmlns:WL5G3N1="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" xmlns:WL5G3N2="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm/policy" xmlns:WL5G3N3="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702" xmlns:WL5G3N4="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:WL5G3N5="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:WL5G3N6="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:WL5G3N7="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/">
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_EchoString_Input_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <sp:SignedParts xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="Sequence" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="SequenceAcknowledgement" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="AckRequested" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <WL5G3N2:RMAssertion>
    <WL5G3N2:InactivityTimeout Milliseconds="600000"/>
    <WL5G3N2:AcknowledgementInterval Milliseconds="200"/>
    </WL5G3N2:RMAssertion>
    <sp:SymmetricBinding xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:ProtectionToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:SecureConversationToken sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:RequireDerivedKeys/>
    <sp:BootstrapPolicy>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:SignedParts>
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    <sp:EncryptedParts>
    <sp:Body/>
    </sp:EncryptedParts>
    <sp:AsymmetricBinding>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:InitiatorToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <!--<sp:RequireThumbprintReference/>-->
    <sp:WssX509V3Token10/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:X509Token>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:InitiatorToken>
    <sp:RecipientToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/Never">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <!--<sp:RequireThumbprintReference/>-->
    <sp:WssX509V3Token10/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:X509Token>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:RecipientToken>
    <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <sp:Layout>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Strict/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Layout>
    <sp:IncludeTimestamp/>
    <sp:OnlySignEntireHeadersAndBody/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AsymmetricBinding>
    <sp:Wss11>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:MustSupportRefKeyIdentifier/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefIssuerSerial/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefThumbprint/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefEncryptedKey/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Wss11>
    <sp:Trust13>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:MustSupportIssuedTokens/>
    <sp:RequireClientEntropy/>
    <sp:RequireServerEntropy/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Trust13>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:BootstrapPolicy>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:SecureConversationToken>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:ProtectionToken>
    <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <sp:Layout>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Strict/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Layout>
    <sp:IncludeTimestamp/>
    <sp:OnlySignEntireHeadersAndBody/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:SymmetricBinding>
    <sp:Wss11 xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:MustSupportRefKeyIdentifier/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefIssuerSerial/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefThumbprint/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefEncryptedKey/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Wss11>
    <sp:Trust13 xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:MustSupportIssuedTokens/>
    <sp:RequireClientEntropy/>
    <sp:RequireServerEntropy/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Trust13>
    <wsam:Addressing xmlns:wsam="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata">
    <wsp:Policy xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <wsam:NonAnonymousResponses/>
    </wsp:Policy>
    </wsam:Addressing>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_EchoString_output_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <sp:SignedParts xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="Sequence" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="SequenceAcknowledgement" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="AckRequested" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="UsesSequenceSTR" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ChannelInstance" Namespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/02/duplex"/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_EchoString_output_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <sp:SignedParts xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="Sequence" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="SequenceAcknowledgement" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="AckRequested" Namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm"/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_EchoString_Input_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <sp:SignedParts xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="Sequence" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="SequenceAcknowledgement" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="AckRequested" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="UsesSequenceSTR" Namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ChannelInstance" Namespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/02/duplex"/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_policy">
    <WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    <WL5G3N0:All>
    <WL5G3N3:RMAssertion/>
    <sp:SymmetricBinding xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:ProtectionToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:SecureConversationToken sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:RequireDerivedKeys/>
    <sp:BootstrapPolicy>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:SignedParts>
    <sp:Body/>
    <sp:Header Name="ChannelInstance" Namespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/02/duplex"/>
    <sp:Header Name="To" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="From" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="FaultTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="ReplyTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="MessageID" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="RelatesTo" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    <sp:Header Name="Action" Namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"/>
    </sp:SignedParts>
    <sp:EncryptedParts>
    <sp:Body/>
    </sp:EncryptedParts>
    <sp:AsymmetricBinding>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:InitiatorToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <!--<sp:RequireThumbprintReference/>-->
    <sp:WssX509V3Token10/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:X509Token>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:InitiatorToken>
    <sp:RecipientToken>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/Never">
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <!--<sp:RequireThumbprintReference/>-->
    <sp:WssX509V3Token10/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:X509Token>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:RecipientToken>
    <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <sp:Layout>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Strict/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Layout>
    <sp:IncludeTimestamp/>
    <sp:OnlySignEntireHeadersAndBody/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AsymmetricBinding>
    <sp:Wss11>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:MustSupportRefKeyIdentifier/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefIssuerSerial/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefThumbprint/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefEncryptedKey/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Wss11>
    <sp:Trust13>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:MustSupportIssuedTokens/>
    <sp:RequireClientEntropy/>
    <sp:RequireServerEntropy/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Trust13>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:BootstrapPolicy>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:SecureConversationToken>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:ProtectionToken>
    <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Basic128Rsa15/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <sp:Layout>
    <wsp15:Policy>
    <sp:Strict/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Layout>
    <sp:IncludeTimestamp/>
    <sp:OnlySignEntireHeadersAndBody/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:SymmetricBinding>
    <sp:Wss11 xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:MustSupportRefKeyIdentifier/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefIssuerSerial/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefThumbprint/>
    <sp:MustSupportRefEncryptedKey/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Wss11>
    <sp:Trust13 xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
    <wsp15:Policy xmlns:wsp15="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <sp:MustSupportIssuedTokens/>
    <sp:RequireClientEntropy/>
    <sp:RequireServerEntropy/>
    </wsp15:Policy>
    </sp:Trust13>
    <cdp:CompositeDuplex xmlns:cdp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/net/2006/06/duplex"/>
    <ow:OneWay xmlns:ow="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/05/routing/policy"/>
    <wsam:Addressing xmlns:wsam="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata">
    <wsp:Policy xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
    <wsam:NonAnonymousResponses/>
    </wsp:Policy>
    </wsam:Addressing>
    </WL5G3N0:All>
    </WL5G3N0:ExactlyOne>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N4:types>
    <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://tempuri.org/Imports" xmlns:msc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/12/wsdl/contract" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:tns="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:wsa="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing" xmlns:wsa10="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing" xmlns:wsam="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata" xmlns:wsap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/policy" xmlns:wsaw="http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy" xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" xmlns:wsx="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <xsd:import namespace="http://tempuri.org/" schemaLocation="RequestReplySignOnly.svc.xsd0.xml"/>
    <xsd:import namespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" schemaLocation="RequestReplySignOnly.svc.xsd1.xml"/>
    </xsd:schema>
    </WL5G3N4:types>
    <WL5G3N4:message name="PingRequest">
    <WL5G3N4:part element="WL5G3N5:PingRequest" name="parameters"/>
    </WL5G3N4:message>
    <WL5G3N4:message name="PingResponse">
    <WL5G3N4:part element="WL5G3N5:PingResponse" name="parameters"/>
    </WL5G3N4:message>
    <WL5G3N4:portType name="IEchoStringSignOnly">
    <WL5G3N4:operation name="EchoString">
    <WL5G3N4:input message="WL5G3N5:PingRequest" name="PingRequest"/>
    <WL5G3N4:output message="WL5G3N5:PingResponse" name="PingResponse"/>
    </WL5G3N4:operation>
    </WL5G3N4:portType>
    <WL5G3N4:binding name="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly" type="WL5G3N5:IEchoStringSignOnly">
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N6:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <WL5G3N4:operation name="EchoString">
    <WL5G3N6:operation soapAction="urn:wsrm:EchoString" style="document"/>
    <WL5G3N4:input name="PingRequest">
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_EchoString_Input_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N6:body use="literal"/>
    </WL5G3N4:input>
    <WL5G3N4:output name="PingResponse">
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly_EchoString_output_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N6:body use="literal"/>
    </WL5G3N4:output>
    </WL5G3N4:operation>
    </WL5G3N4:binding>
    <WL5G3N4:binding name="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1" type="WL5G3N5:IEchoStringSignOnly">
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N7:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <WL5G3N4:operation name="EchoString">
    <WL5G3N7:operation soapAction="urn:wsrm:EchoString" style="document"/>
    <WL5G3N4:input name="PingRequest">
    <WL5G3N7:body use="literal"/>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_EchoString_Input_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    </WL5G3N4:input>
    <WL5G3N4:output name="PingResponse">
    <WL5G3N7:body use="literal"/>
    <WL5G3N0:Policy>
    <WL5G3N0:PolicyReference URI="#CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1_EchoString_output_policy"/>
    </WL5G3N0:Policy>
    </WL5G3N4:output>
    </WL5G3N4:operation>
    </WL5G3N4:binding>
    <WL5G3N4:service name="EchoStringSignOnly">
    <WL5G3N4:port binding="WL5G3N5:CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly" name="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly">
    <WL5G3N6:address location="http://mss-rrsp-01/ReliableMessaging_Service_WSAddressing10_Indigo/RequestReplySignOnly.svc/SecureReliable_Addressable_Soap11_WSAddressing10_RM11"/>
    <wsa10:EndpointReference xmlns:wsa10="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
    <wsa10:Address>http://mss-rrsp-01/ReliableMessaging_Service_WSAddressing10_Indigo/RequestReplySignOnly.svc/SecureReliable_Addressable_Soap11_WSAddressing10_RM11</wsa10:Address>
    <Identity xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2006/02/addressingidentity">
    <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
    <X509Data>
    <X509Certificate>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</X509Certificate>
    </X509Data>
    </KeyInfo>
    </Identity>
    </wsa10:EndpointReference>
    </WL5G3N4:port>
    <WL5G3N4:port binding="WL5G3N5:CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1" name="CustomBinding_IEchoStringSignOnly1">
    <WL5G3N7:address location="http://mss-rrsp-01/ReliableMessaging_Service_WSAddressing10_Indigo/RequestReplySignOnly.svc/SecureReliable_Anonymous_Soap12_WSAddressing10_RM10"/>
    <wsa10:EndpointReference xmlns:wsa10="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
    <wsa10:Address>http://mss-rrsp-01/ReliableMessaging_Service_WSAddressing10_Indigo/RequestReplySignOnly.svc/SecureReliable_Anonymous_Soap12_WSAddressing10_RM10</wsa10:Address>
    <Identity xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2006/02/addressingidentity">
    <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
    <X509Data>
    <X509Certificate>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</X509Certificate>
    </X509Data>
    </KeyInfo>
    </Identity>
    </wsa10:EndpointReference>
    </WL5G3N4:port>
    </WL5G3N4:service>
    </WL5G3N4:definitions>

    Bruce Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi Michael,
    The short answer, at this time, OOTB, WS-RM interop with an unknown
    vendor would be doubtful. For a longer answer, David Orchard has a good
    review of the emerging web services specs [0]. You might consider ebXML
    messaging [1] as a more mature solution.
    Thank you Bruce. I will look at these docs.
    Mike S.
    Hope this helps,
    Bruce
    [0]
    http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/articles/ws_orchard.jsp
    [1]
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wli/docs70/ebxml/getstart.htm
    Michael Shea wrote:
    Hello,
    We have developed an application that is running on the WebLogic AppServer v8.1
    sp1.
    Recently we have received a request/query on providing reliable SOAPmessaging
    from our application to 3rd party.
    I have read the documentation on Reliable messaging support and havenoted that
    it is only supported between two WebLogic Application servers.
    My questions are, since we do not have control of the 3rd party's application,
    and it may not be based on a WebLogic App Server:
    1. Will this work?
    2. Does anyone have any idea of the type of issues that may be experienced?
    3. How close is the implementation to the WS Reliable Messaging specification?
    So, if the other party was based on an IBM or Microsoft implementationis this
    likely to work?
    It goes without saying that any work done would need to be very throughlytested
    and qualified.
    I have looked through the WebLogic Documentation on WebServices aswell as searching
    this newgroup for other posts on this topic, hopefully I have not missedanything
    (If so, my apologies.)
    Thanks,
    Mike Shea.

  • Hey Apple, the problem isn't us and isn't going away - QT audio ok but

    QT audio ok but QT video just not showing up
    Hey Apple, look into this as too many posts on too many forums here verifying that the QT movies work with 3rd party browsers but even the latest Safari beta browser is only delivering audio.
    ok, so maybe we aren't running intel dual processors, but we are running the latest versions of os X and QT on our PowerPC computers. someone at Apple needs to wake up and just tell us it's our problem since we haven't bought a new Intel based computer or either make a fix.
    after reading so many posts in PowerPC forums --> even Tiger forums, and even QT forums about this problem it can't be explained off as "you installed something on your computer that won't let you see video in a QT movie on this official Apple website"
    i expect this post to be heavily monitored or even closed for discussion - but doing so won't wash away the problem. just tell us to get a new intel-duo based mac as our older macs aren't up to par or something - or just tell us something like it's a recognized problem on older macs or video will become a problem in QT more and more with older macs.
    more and more users like me are left hanging in thinking that we have installed or done something to our older macs that won't let us see video [only hear audio]. yet the fact remains that if we fire up firefox or a 3rd party browser then all works fine.
    just one of many links is:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5285064&#5285064
    Message was edited by: mjp29

    I have found a better solution that dragging the plug-in to the desktop:
    I copy /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/QuickTime Plugin.webplugin into my local directory
    ~/Library/Internet Plug-Ins
    And now I can see the videos from Apple website over Safari!
    I guess "my" Safari doesn't look into the main directory, but into the local one. It should be the other way around, but at least this fixes the problem more elegantly.
    Still, the thing is unclear. A colleague with a new MacBook doesn't experience this problem. His local Internet Plug-Ins are empty, and Safari runs perfectly. Weird!?!?!!?!!

  • The problem about the signal of JNI

    Hello,
    When the system (it creates by the C language) created here is operated on Solaris and javaVM is operated using a JNI, the phenomenon which the core file outputs within the JIT compiler of java (libsunwjit.so) has occurred.
    Although it had generated twice until now, since it had collided with the signal which the signal has generated in one of the another threads, and it uses internally by JavaVM from the contents of a core file when it generated first, it had generated.
    However, although the core file was investigated when it generated at the 2nd times, there was no trace that another thread generated the signal.
    Is there any case where collide with the signal currently used by JavaVM, and also a signal is generated in a JIT compiler?
    What thing has an obstacle used as the factor which a JIT compiler makes have generated the signal in the past again?
    Please give me the reply to the above-mentioned question for a cause elucidation.
    As appending data, the contents which referred to the core file are described below.
    (gdb) thread 1
    [Switching to thread 1 (LWP    163        )]
    #0 0xfe359d88 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #1 0xfe34eb34 in __sigredirect () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #2 0xfe351a10 in thrpkill_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #3 0xfe239470 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
    #4 0xfb49353c in panicHandler ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/classic/libjvm.so
    #5 0xfb798084 in intrDispatchMD ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/native_threads/libhpi.so
    #6 0xfe359348 in __libthread_segvhdlr () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #7 0xfe35bdf0 in __sighndlr () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #8 0xfe3586f8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
    #9 0xfb3bd8bc in JITPerformDynamicPatch ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/libsunwjit.so
    #10 0xfb3de848 in JITResolveConstPoolEntry ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/libsunwjit.so
    #11 0xb945908 in ?? ()
    #12 0xc5054e4 in ?? ()
    #13 0xe2974c in ?? ()
    #14 0x851b75c in ?? ()
    #15 0x7c3841c in ?? ()
    #16 0xb917560 in ?? ()
    #17 0x8a9b6d4 in ?? ()
    #18 0xb8e18e0 in ?? ()
    #19 0x71377d8 in ?? ()
    #20 0x7137784 in ?? ()
    #21 0x7d7d7f4 in ?? ()
    #22 0xc67c4b0 in ?? ()
    #23 0x913998c in ?? ()
    #24 0xb2bf58 in ?? ()
    #25 0xc51a854 in ?? ()
    #26 0x8794c7c in ?? ()
    #27 0xfb3de980 in JIT_INVOKER_MARKER ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/libsunwjit.so
    #28 0xfb494cec in notJavaInvocation ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/classic/libjvm.so
    #29 0xfb457674 in jni_Invoke ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/classic/libjvm.so
    #30 0xfb45930c in jni_CallVoidMethod ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/JasEMedia/jre/lib/sparc/classic/libjvm.so
    #31 0xfbee0d7c in ChartJem_Generate ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/EMImageChart/lib/GKM0JEMC.so
    #32 0xfb7630a4 in ?? ()
    from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/data/default/methods/JasEMedia/lib043C.so.2.0
    #33 0xff2b106c in odb_OmsPcExec () from /opt/fujitsu/jasmine/lib/libjas.so
    Please contact me, if the core file is required. Separately, I will send.
    In that case, also about the transmission method, please unite and contact me.
    The system configuration is as follows.
    Operation System:SOLARIS(7)R00081
    Java version:1.2.2 Classic VM (build JDK-1.2.2-W, green threads, sunwjit)
    I'm hoping someone can help me out.
    Thanks!

    After that, a problem is not solved. Would you teach, if there is the method of something saying?

  • The problem about vrrp

    Dear all,I have a problem about vrrp,my core switch is cisco 3750x and huawei S5700-28C-EI, after I configured vrrp between them,the switch log got the error problem as follow:
    *Jan 11 00:01:43.111: %VRRP-6-STATECHANGE: g1/0 Grp 3 state Backup -> Master
    *Jan 11 00:01:43.111: VRRP: tbridge_smf_update failed
    *Jan 11 00:01:44.187: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.34 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0
    *Jan 11 00:01:46.539: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.36 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0                
    *Jan 11 00:01:50.323: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.34 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0
    *Jan 11 00:01:51.707: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.36 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0
    *Jan 11 00:01:52.079: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.34 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0
    *Jan 11 00:01:53.079: VRRP: Advertisement from 10.252.200.34 has an incorrect group 10 id for interface g1/0
    If cisco and huawei cannot interconnect with each other?

    Can you post the interface config from the huawei and cisco device?
    HTH,
    John
    *** Please rate all useful posts ***

Maybe you are looking for