The split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)

Dear All,
A component(Y) in the BOM of X is manufactured in house (70%) & procured directly from vendor (30%).
Can we have the split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)
Based on the cost we deside to make or buy.
Please explain the procedural steps in arriving at this solution.
Regards,
Kumar

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Similar Messages

Routing during Standard Cost Estimation

Dear all,
We are executing the Standard Costing using t_code CK11N for a finished product,,,for the same we have maintained BOM, but no routing has been created,,
so, during execution of Standard Costing system is prompting a msg: No routing could be determined for material AUBF0018 (green indicator not an error msg), so if we try save the costing a success msg: "The cost estimate is being save" is being prompted,, but the standard cost did not get updated in material master.
what would be the cause? Is routing essential prior to standard cost execution,,, as our Client says that without routing also they could excute/update the standard cost earlier,,, why this problem is occuring? is there any thing need to be defined in customization for routing not to consider during standard cost estimation,
Please help us in this regard,
thanks
Kumar

Dear Urendra,
1.After executing the costing run with quantity structure in CK11N and saving the datas,it only saves the cost estimate.
2.Marking and release should be done using CK24.First the same has to be marked and then using the same T Code you have to
release it,only after this steps it get's updated in the material master.
3.In your case you have done only CK11N and not CK24.
4.Moreover the routing get's picked automatically by the costing variant that you use,in your case even though there is no
routing,the systems throws the message before saving,but the status will be saved with errors.
Check with this and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Difference in the Material variant BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded
during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded
during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Difference in the BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ

Hi!
our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
goods movements have been posted for those materials.
Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
regs,
ramesh

Hi Ramesh,
When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
Create a new valuation type for the same material
Crate CK11N & CK94,
Run CK11N
Run CK24.
Then release the billing document.
Let me know if you need more details.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Standard Cost Estimation Functionality removal from S.O.

Hi Friends,
I would like to know, is in SAP system there is an option to remove funcionality of auto Stadard cost Estimation i.e. we don't like to make Standard cost Estimation at the time of Sales order creation.
Can you Please tell me about this feature.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

Hi,
I am talking about the Cost Estimation happens, as it shows the cost via menu path---> Extra --> Costing. Further, the system will make the accounting entries for consumptions/Receipt w.r.t. to cost calculated vai this estimation. VPRS condition is not having the same prices as calculated in Costing. Further, the stock will also remain with same prices as calculated in price.
Can you please suggest, if there is any option, so that we can omit this costing calculation and system make consumption/receipt entries with the values in material master.
Rgds / Krishan Raheja.

Standard cost estimation along with departmental transfer

Hi Friends,
I will like to have the overview of the
1. departmental transfer price.
2. CKM3N (i.e. material price analysis, what is the difference between activation and non activation of it.)
3. KB21N (Direct activity allocation)
What are their connection in estimating the standard price.

Hi Friend
1) Transfer prices
Transfer price is a price used to valuate the transfer of goods and service between profits centers. Precondition is that you have Material Ledger active
Legal View = Company Code
                                             Parallel Valuation Approach
                                            /                       |                     \
                                    Group                Legal               Profit Center
- If currency type 32, transfer price is active
- Internal moves are always valued at procurement price
2) CKM3N
Before you activate Material Ledger you would have the option of S or V Price control, however when you activate ML you   can value Materials at "periodic unit price", this price takes into account all the transactions of a material in a period(i.e goods movements, procurement etc..) and then at the end of the period revaluates the Material with a new periodic unit price.
3) KB21N
Allocation in general means taking cost accumulated on one object and allocating it to another, usually a cost center.
Direct Activity Allocation is where you use transactions KB21 (KB21N) to manually allocation costs from the cost collector (e.g. Order) to a specific Cost Center. The activities can come from PS or from CATS Activity Recording. These activities are assigned to an order/wbs/network. And from there via the transaction KB21/KB21N they are allocated to a specific cost center.
I hope the above information helps.
Regards,
Declan

Standard Cost Estimation

Dear All,
Yesterday we taken the costing run for all 5 plants, in this 5 plants we have problem with 3rd plant.
During costing result the price is Rs. 69 Rs.
However it is release with Rs. 2.8 only in Material master
Previous price in Material Master is Rs. 12,500/-
But in Material master shown Rs. 500/-.
So, Any one could you guide me how can i solve this problem.....
Thanks for Advance....
Thanks & Regards,
Chandrababu.B

Dear Adi,
Exactly your right.....,
The Costing Lot Size = 25 in Material Master
Before Marking = 69.97
After Release = 2.80
Here the calculation is 69.97/25 = 2.80
As per your suggestion i checked it.....
Thanks a lot Adi....
Thanks & Regards,
Chandrababu.B

Standard cost error..

Hi Friends
We have a material with diffrent valuation type per say MFG and procurment etc. During standard costing I found that standard cost is updated only at header level not at child material level, which cause of a loss of the difference cost.
Stock value is based on the individual valuation type i.e. is correct. But the problem in valuation type -MFG which having price control "S" having rate which was uploaded at the beginning of the SAP live . Now the standard cost of material has increased The stock which we are having in plant, evaluated at lower rate where it is consuming all raw materials at inflated/higher price. Why does its happening?
Please help us in solving this.

Hi,
You have to change the standard price, whenever price increase.
t-code is MR21.
Sudarsan S R

Goods movement - without Standard cost

Hello All
In our existing client system, price control for new material X is maintained as 'S'. We have not maintained the standard price in it yet.
Ideally if price control is 'S' and you dont maintain a Standard cost of the material. SAP does not allows any goods movement on this material.
But without standard cost if I am able to raise a Purchase order (which is fine) and also able to do GR (using MIGO).
The result being GR is done and FI document is posted with PO price + MAP is updated with PO price.
Is it std SAP functionality or is there is a setting which I have missed. Please let me know.
Note: Price control indicator for material type is 'S'.

Dear Rajeshwari,
1.You can use the plant specific material status to block the material for production,purchase and inventory management,by
creating a new key in OMS4 and set the value as B in all these parameters and assign this value in the material master in MRP1
view of the particular material and set the valied from date.
2.In case if you want to remove this valu or say you have carried out a standard cost estimate,you can remove the assignment in
MM02.
3.For blocking the production order creation for the materials that does not contain a standard cost use this BADI -
WORKORDER_UPDATE(method during Release).
Check this link,
Re: error msg if no standard cost present for Production order target cost
4.Also go through the points suggested by Ajay,
Regards
S Mangalraj

Error: no product cost estimation possible, at the releasing for accounting

Hi Guru,
while releasing for account in billing document for the finished product.Shows Error as:"no product cost estimation not allowed". Thou I cheked configuration checking of costing key in COPA and costing variant of relevant one looks fine. Plz guide me further more configuration and basic settings needed in to solve this task.
Thanking u in advance
Murali.

Pawan,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I have done those change also, still it is coming same as " No Product cost estimate was found". check you costing key 100 in COPA configuration. i have checked costing key configuration , in that costing varinat PPC1, Costing Version 1, Period/Indicator as "Current Standard cost estimate Acc. to entry in Material Master" .
How to fix this, guide me
Sateesh

Selction of PV during Std cost estimate

hi guys,
Is it possible to set the selection of production version when running standard cost estimate CK11N,
thanks in advance,
Mohan M

Hi
yes if you maintain the production version at workscheduling tab in material master,
then at time of CK11n running in quantity structure tab you have option to slectthe production version
check
-ashok

Ical all day events show over 2 days during standard time (Nov-Apr)

Any all day event (either a holiday or an event I have repeating every year like a birthday) I have on my calender during standard time (from November to April) shows over a two day period.
For example, Christmas Eve shows up on Dec. 23 and 24.
I have tried syncing with time zone support on and off. I have tried using the same time zone in a different hemisphere. I had this problem last year and again this year. Once we switch to daylight savings the event show correctly.
Any suggestions?

Thanks for the link--seems I'll just have to deal with the Palm/iCal calendaring anomalies. Do these "representation disconnects" have anything to do with the weird behavior of my iCal calendars, now that I've synced my palm data to iCal? Immediately after the original Palm/iCal sync, the calendars came up in iCal with no problem. Once I quit iCal, however, and then re-opened it, the list of calendars had disappeared from the "Calendars" pane to the left of the grid, and all of the events had disappeared as well.
As someone reported elsewhere in this forum, changing the viewing mode (day, week or month) causes the events themselves to reappear, but the "Calendars" pane remains blank.
I had hoped to ditch palm desktop and streamline my calendar /contact--computer/iPhone syncing, but iCal's odd behavior is making me question whether or not it is stable enough to fully rely on.
Is there anything that will make the calendars and events perform more reliably?
G5-Dual 2.5 GHz Mac OS X (10.4.10)

Raw materials on MAP with split valuation used in standard cost estimate

We have a few raw materials which are purchased from different vendors and of different brands. We have opened split valuations for these raw materials. These raw materials are later used in manufacture of different finished goods. We use MAP for raw materials and Std. for finished goods. What configuration and processing steps will be required to run standards cost estimate and what will be standard price for a finished good considering the following example:
Material X is finished good
Raw Material A with split valuation @ USD 5 (brand aplha) & USD 10 (brand beta)
Raw Material B without split valuation @ USD 1
It is expected that we used brand aplha 60% of the time and brand beta 40% of the time and production batch size is usually 100 Kg.
Please reply
Edited by: Chris SAP on Sep 29, 2011 7:56 AM

hi chris
Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
please go through this thread also
Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
Krishna

When setting the split-days to "every 15 minutes," the week and comparison views show incorrect time ranges for the day

When I change the "split-days" interval time, under Options > Settings, to
15, or every 15 minutes, the week and comparison views don't show the correct
time range for the day.

For example, if I click View to display the calendar and then click Week to get
a weekly view, the time range displayed is from 6:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. If I click Comparison to get a
comparison view, the time range displayed is from 12 p.m.
to 6:45 p.m.

In this example, should both of these views show the same time range, from
9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.?
No, the two views will not necessarily show the same time range. The time
range for the comparison view will start at the beginning prefs time only
if you have something scheduled (on any day of the week) starting at that
time. For example, on one of the days during your week of comparison, if you
create an event that starts at 9:00 a.m. and then open the comparison view, the
time range displayed will start with 9:00 a.m.

Additionally, view times will expand past the configured settings if events
span past the time range. That is, if you have an event that spans from
5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., the event will be reflected in the view, even though
your time range may be set to go only to 6:00 p.m.

Umm yes.
The settings are stored in ''prefs.js'', so you could swap various copies of this file in and out.
However, the system will load ''prefs.js'', then, if present, ''user.js'' , so you can set up just your changes in ''user.js'' .
The sort of line you need to look for is like this:
<code>user_pref("mail.server.server14.check_time", 10);</code>
You'll need to do some research to identify which of your accounts is which.
Search for the account's email address:
<code>user_pref("mail.identity.id10.useremail", "xenos@example.com");</code>
Use the id number to locate the account number:
<code>user_pref("mail.account.account29.identities", "id10");</code>
Use the account number to find the server number:
<code>user_pref("mail.account.account29.server", "server14");</code>
Finally, you can then use the server number find the account's time setting:
<code>user_pref("mail.server.server14.check_time", 10);</code>
This last entry may not exist, if you have never changed the setting from the default 10 minutes.
Do be careful with your typing and copy/pasting; if the file fails the syntax parser it will silently fail.
And make sure Thunderbird is shut down when you do the swap. If it's open, it may overwrite changes, and in any case, it only reads the settings file when it starts up.

The split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for