The switch to udev

Hi,
Will there be a new release of Arch (.8) to handle the switch to udev? Or maybe a pacman-accessible program to make all the changes? I realize that there is a wiki page about it but a lot of people won't be able to implement the change properly.
Oh yeah, how close is it to happening??
Jim

leeghoofd wrote:The program fstab-sync added a line for the dvd-burner automatic
$ pacman -Qo /usr/sbin/fstab-sync
/usr/sbin/fstab-sync is owned by hal 0.5.2-3
That's hal working for you David, not udev - very handy alright.
dibblethewrecker wrote:My old distro used /dev/hda - and cos it was old and not bleeding edge I assumed that was the devfs way but it seems not and the /dev/discs is actually the devs fs way and i now need to use all /dev/hd* stuff with udev - is that right?
Before udev, before devfs, there was static dev, although nobody called it that back then - it was (and still is) the /dev directory - here's a small excerpt from the one on my Debian server:
$ ls /dev/hd*
/dev/hda /dev/hda2 /dev/hdb11 /dev/hdb4 /dev/hdc14 /dev/hdc7 /dev/hdd17 /dev/hde /dev/hde2 /dev/hdf11 /dev/hdf4 /dev/hdg14 /dev/hdg7 /dev/hdh17
/dev/hda1 /dev/hda20 /dev/hdb12 /dev/hdb5 /dev/hdc15 /dev/hdc8 /dev/hdd18 /dev/hde1 /dev/hde20 /dev/hdf12 /dev/hdf5 /dev/hdg15 /dev/hdg8 /dev/hdh18
/dev/hda10 /dev/hda3 /dev/hdb13 /dev/hdb6 /dev/hdc16 /dev/hdc9 /dev/hdd19 /dev/hde10 /dev/hde3 /dev/hdf13 /dev/hdf6 /dev/hdg16 /dev/hdg9 /dev/hdh19
/dev/hda11 /dev/hda4 /dev/hdb14 /dev/hdb7 /dev/hdc17 /dev/hdd /dev/hdd2 /dev/hde11 /dev/hde4 /dev/hdf14 /dev/hdf7 /dev/hdg17 /dev/hdh /dev/hdh2
/dev/hda12 /dev/hda5 /dev/hdb15 /dev/hdb8 /dev/hdc18 /dev/hdd1 /dev/hdd20 /dev/hde12 /dev/hde5 /dev/hdf15 /dev/hdf8 /dev/hdg18 /dev/hdh1 /dev/hdh20
/dev/hda13 /dev/hda6 /dev/hdb16 /dev/hdb9 /dev/hdc19 /dev/hdd10 /dev/hdd3 /dev/hde13 /dev/hde6 /dev/hdf16 /dev/hdf9 /dev/hdg19 /dev/hdh10 /dev/hdh3
/dev/hda14 /dev/hda7 /dev/hdb17 /dev/hdc /dev/hdc2 /dev/hdd11 /dev/hdd4 /dev/hde14 /dev/hde7 /dev/hdf17 /dev/hdg /dev/hdg2 /dev/hdh11 /dev/hdh4
/dev/hda15 /dev/hda8 /dev/hdb18 /dev/hdc1 /dev/hdc20 /dev/hdd12 /dev/hdd5 /dev/hde15 /dev/hde8 /dev/hdf18 /dev/hdg1 /dev/hdg20 /dev/hdh12 /dev/hdh5
/dev/hda16 /dev/hda9 /dev/hdb19 /dev/hdc10 /dev/hdc3 /dev/hdd13 /dev/hdd6 /dev/hde16 /dev/hde9 /dev/hdf19 /dev/hdg10 /dev/hdg3 /dev/hdh13 /dev/hdh6
/dev/hda17 /dev/hdb /dev/hdb2 /dev/hdc11 /dev/hdc4 /dev/hdd14 /dev/hdd7 /dev/hde17 /dev/hdf /dev/hdf2 /dev/hdg11 /dev/hdg4 /dev/hdh14 /dev/hdh7
/dev/hda18 /dev/hdb1 /dev/hdb20 /dev/hdc12 /dev/hdc5 /dev/hdd15 /dev/hdd8 /dev/hde18 /dev/hdf1 /dev/hdf20 /dev/hdg12 /dev/hdg5 /dev/hdh15 /dev/hdh8
/dev/hda19 /dev/hdb10 /dev/hdb3 /dev/hdc13 /dev/hdc6 /dev/hdd16 /dev/hdd9 /dev/hde19 /dev/hdf10 /dev/hdf3 /dev/hdg13 /dev/hdg6 /dev/hdh16 /dev/hdh9
Only hda and hdb actually exist.......

Similar Messages

Can my macbook pro mid 2007 3.1 AA896ll/a handle a SSD and how do I make the switch. Can I do a clean install of Snow Leopard from an original cd

Here is my problem, I want to upgrade my macbook pro mid 2007 3.1 AA896ll/a to an Solid State Drive, a Crucial m4 256 gb, I want to know if the macbook will be able to handle it and how do I do the switch. also once I install the drive will I be able to boot from my Snow Leoard original cd and do a clean install. Thank you

Coming from a 5,400 RPM drive that's nearly filled up, fragmented and deoptimized to a fresh install of OS X on a SSD will of course be a improvement.
However fresh installing OS X on a new 5,400 RPM will also see a improvement, boot up in 30 seconds.
A fresh install of OS X on a new 7,200 RPM drive will also see a improvement, boot up in 25 seconds.
A fresh install of OS X on a new SSD will see the best improvement, boot up in 20 seconds on fast SATA connections.
OS X still requires time to setup and that takes about 20 seconds despite how fast your boot drive is, that's why sleep was created.
Things to consider: The higher cost of a SSD, the limiting capacity (hard drives hold way more up), the SATA I speed limitations (slows up on large file transfers), the difficulty to scrub the SSD of unwanted data (like you can a hard drive), and it's limited write capability. Also the smaller SSD's are faster than the larger ones.
SSD's are shock proof, which is their slight advantage over hard drives.
I see a 120GB SSD in a SATA I machine as being a waste, it's too small of a storage space (500GB+ is ideal), the SATA I connection is slow and other factors that make a 7,200 RPM drive a better option in that machine.
One can get a 750 GB 7,200 RPM hard drive for about the same price and still maximize their boot time in the process, also being able to scrub their drive of unwanted data easily.
SSD's can't be scrubbed, one has to fill 50% of the remaining space with many, very small files to overwrite the free space, then do another 50% again to defeat the Trim/wear leveling as SSD's write to less used location each time. If one fills a OS X boot drive up completely, it won't function or won't boot up.
If you do this fill routine regularly with software, then you prematurely wear out the SSD as it has limited writes. Why Disk Utility doesn't offer zero or 7x erase for SSD's.
If your in the 10% of Internet traffic that's going to adult sites, then the ability to scrub the caches and storage drive of embarrassing unwanted data is a necessity. Especially in the light of software and hardware that can read the SSD of deleted data.
Trick links and redirects on poisoned sites can firebomb your Mac with some pretty bad pictures and your hidden caches as well, especially if you don't like to pay.
IT personal have at their disposal free open source forensic software that basically aggregates all the past behavior done on the machine into a nice, easy to view format with times, dates and when and where content was downloaded from.
Since one has to give up their password for repair folks to recover data and fix the machine...
I think a SSD is less of a benefit over a 7,200 hard drive for that particular model of Mac for a mere few seconds faster boot time.

Can not see the icons in the switcher

Hi,
This is R12.1.3
I have a switcher in the custom page and I set a couple of icon files I need to use, verified that those are under JDEV_USER_HOME\jdev\myhtml\OA_MEDIA
But icons don't show up.
Following other forum threads I tried couple of thins - I added /OA_MEDIA/ in front of the file name, I also removed system folder. Nothing helped.
In the tutorial app rinning from the same PC icons do show up fine in the switcher, in that case the image file is set to be just the file name.
But I can't figure why.
Any pointers are greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Anatoliy

Adding /OA_MEDIA/ should work. Did you check deploying in the instance? Also try clear all browser cache and check once (shouldn't be the cause for this issue though).
Thanks
Shree

On screen lock screen, the keyboard does not work, switching to the switch-user screen the keyboard works again

Mac OS-X 10.7.5, Mac Air.
This began about 5 to 7 days ago.
Steps to reproduce:
Step 1:
Close the lid, or the system 'powers down', or goes to the screen saver mode.
Step 2:
Open the lid, press the power button, or what ever to wake up the Mac Air
The "Enter your password" screen is presented.
They keyboard is not responsive, I cannot type anything.
The touch pad works, I can power on/off the machine.
They keyboard is not functional.
Result: I cannot log in again.
Expected behavior: The keyboard should be working I should be able to unlock the screen.
Workarounds:
Then click on my name, or any other user of the machine and it works fine.
I can now unlock the screen and return to where I was.
Expected behavior:
I should not have to go to the "Switch User Screen" to log back in.

More detail: Some keys on the keyboard do work, ie: caps lock toggles the led, and the function keys across the top seem to work {that is I can adjust brightness, and so forth}
the letter and numbers, and perhap others do not work.

ASA 5505 8.4. How to configure the switch to the backup channel to the primary with a delay (ex., 5 min) using the SLA?

I have ASA 5505 8.4. How to configure the switch to the backup channel to the primary with a delay (for example 5 min.) using the SLA monitor?
Or as something else to implement it?
My configuration for SLA monitor:
sla monitor 123
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho IP_GATEWAY_MAIN interface outside_cifra
num-packets 3
timeout 3000
frequency 10
sla monitor schedule 123 life forever start-time now
track 1 rtr 123 reachability

Hey cadet alain,
thank you for your answer :-)
I have deleted all such attempts not working, so a packet-trace will be not very useful conent...
Here is the LogLine when i try to browse port 80 from outside (80.xxx.xxx.180:80) without VPN connection:
3
Nov 21 2011
18:29:56
77.xxx.xxx.99
59068
80.xxx.xxx.180
80
TCP access denied by ACL from 77.xxx.xxx.99/59068 to outside:80.xxx.xxx.180/80
The attached file is only the show running-config
Now i can with my AnyConnect Clients, too, but after connection is up, my vpnclients can't surf the web any longer because anyconnect serves as default route on 0.0.0.0 ... that's bad, too
Actually the AnyConnect and Nat/ACL Problem are my last two open Problems until i setup the second ASA on the right ;-)
Regards.
Chris

I downloaded today 09.19.2013 iOS 7 on my iphone 4 and iPad retina. Unfortunately on the camera app the switch from photo to video does not work neither on iphone nor on ipad. Is it a "youth" bug ?

I downloaded ios 7 today 09.19.2013 on my iphone 4 and ipad retina 3hrd generation 64g . The switch from photo to video on the camera app does not work neither on iphone nor on ipad. Is it a "youth"bug ?

Did you try swipe up and down to change?

I've Made the Switch (from iWeb) & Lived to Tell About It.

I've gotten a lot of help and useful information from this forum over the years and I will certainly miss it. I've just completed a 2 month transition where I've migrated my site from iWeb/Mobile Me to a new site made in RapidWeaver and hosted by Host Excellence. I figured I'd write a little (or a lot) about my experience, to give some others an idea of what they've got to look forward too. Hopefully it will arm you with some things to do and look out for. While I am describing RapidWeaver here, a lot of this process will be the same no matter what new software you use. I started off being pretty happy with what I had going in iWeb and not being thrilled at all about making the switch. Now I am so glad I made the switch and I am far happier about the new site than I was with the old one. BTW: the new sites address is: http://grillinsmokin.net . Feel free to visit. I think you'll quickly notice some things you simple can't do in iWeb. This isn't a knock against iWeb. I was very happy with iWeb and had no plans to switch. Where it hasn't been developed actively for four years now, it has been left behind somewhat.
To begin at the beginning: I've had a site made with iWeb since January of 2006 called Grillin' & Smokin' that combined my love of outdoor cooking and photography. Over the years it had grown rather large, with 375 photo entry pages and 230 blog pages. The Domain file was around 1.4 GB. This was not something I ever wanted to have to recreate from scratch. However losing MobileMe as a host was taking away Value Added features like the Hit Counter, Slide Show, Blog Comments, Blog Search etc. The handwriting is on the wall for iWeb too. I might have gone on using iWeb, but between losing key features and the fact iWeb was starting to show it's age, it was time for me to move on. Just before the iCloud announcement this Spring, I began researching website building software. I looked at their features, working methodology, themes, plug-ins and extensions. I download trial versions of the software where it was available as well as some of the themes or plugins I might be using. I gotta tell you, at first I was very frustrated and upset, because I was not finding anything that had the ease of use of iWeb and looked like it was going to be able to recreate the appearance of my original site. It appeared to be a series of compromises. I'd like the features of one package but I hated the themes available for that software. Another looked promising but isn't being upgraded regularly. My biggest frustration was some of the iWeb page types just don't exist in other packages. For example the Album Pages where multiple Photo Pages can be grouped and displayed, don't have a direct equivalent in any other package I saw. As part of my discovery process I read reviews of the various packages, including head to head comparisons of some of them. I also visited their discussion forums. After doing this for 3 weeks I "settled" on RapidWeaver. It was under active development; had a thriving developer community turning out a wide variety of add ons, plug-ins and themes; had an active user community & had lots of help resources available. The web pages it produced were standards compliant and you could get nice effects without resorting to Flash. I think the biggest selling point was all of the add-ons-kind of the same advantage the iPhone has with it's App Store.
Once I bought RapidWeaver & a 3rd Party theme, I tried the demo versions of some of the plug-ins and made sample versions of my page types from iWeb in RapidWeaver. I wanted to have a process in place, before I started mass production on the site. You really do need to do some of this homework in advance to avoid unpleasant surprises. The biggest minus I'd turned up about RapidWeaver (RW from this point on) is it didn't handle big sites well at all. The equivalent of the iWeb Domain file is the RapidWeaver Sandwich file or RWSW file. Once the RWSW file reaches 100MB or so you can get crashes or hangs uploading your site. Now 100 MB doesn't sound like much particularly when I was talking about a 1.4GB iWeb Domain File for my site, but RW doesn't include the photos in the RWSW file. Still I knew I was going to have to divide my site across several RWSW files. Initially the plan was to divide it into 3 sites: The main landing pages was one RWSW file and is the site reached by the url for the site. I was going to have a second RWSW file for my blogs and a third for my photos. Ultimately I ended up dividing the photos into 3 RWSW files. These extra files are hosted on sub-domians whose name goes in front of the main domain (http://sub-domain.main-domain.com). This meant some extra setup for me with my web-host, although they made the setup for the 4 sub-domains very easy and they were free. If you have a huge site and will need to split it, you'll want to check with your prospective web host if they charge extra for hosting additional sub-domains. For small iWebs sites this is not an issue-you have one RWSW file and one web address, just like you do now. My having sub-domains also meant more work linking files together across sites. RapidWeaver has something called an Offsite Page which helped with some of this, but having to split my sites up was the biggest PITA for me about the whole process. But knowing about this going in was better than finding out at the end when I tried to upload a single massive site. If you have a small site, the setup for uploading it is as straight forward as iWeb. RW has a built in FTP uploader or you can publish to file and use an FTP client like CyberDuck.
Once I had my site organization in place and had experimented with best practices for recreating each iWeb page type in RW, it was time to begin. I've gotta tell you when I started out I was not a happy camper. I liked the iWeb way of doing things about 70 percent of the time vs 30 percent for RW. At the end of the first week I told myself I have to move on and give up on the past. I was no longer going to be using iWeb and the sooner I embraced the RW way of doing things, the better off I'd be. At this early point it was still hard to see down the road to the end results. No matter what new package you buy, you should try to go with the flow and learn a new way of working. You'll be happier and less frustrated in the end. In my case after having gone through the entire process now, I've ended up changing my opinion. Now that I've gone through the entire process, I like the RapidWeaver way of doing things about 95 percent of the time and 5% for iWeb. That 5 percent is mostly the large site issue I've described. As I began working I was able to reuse much of the text from my iWeb blog in RW. I did have to paste it in as unformatted and reformat it in RW. My pictures were well organized in Aperture which also helped speed the process. One of the things I did is automate some of the tedious repetitious tasks. I created Quickeys macros to do things for me when ever possible. For example I could go to a particular photo page in iWeb and select the first caption. I would then trigger a macro that asked how many captions are on this page. It would then select the caption in iWeb, copy it, switch to RW and paste it in place and repeat XX times. If you know Quickeys or Applescript (I am guessing) there are plenty of opportunities to put it to good use.
RW present a different way of working than you are used to in iWeb and you'll just need to get used to it. What I am describing here would be true of any of the other packages I looked at too. First off it isn't WYSIWYG while you are editing. You are working with fairly basic looking text with few clues as to what the real page looks like. You switch to a preview mode to see what the page looks like in a browser. At first blush iWeb seems to win here. But what I soon realized is RW allows you to mix regular text and pictures together with html snippets right in the same text box. This makes adding counters or badges easy. Plus you can use HTML formatting for things like Titles occurring through your page. Instead of increasing the font size, making the text bold and changing its color, you can simply say this is Heading style 2 or 5 and this happens automatically per the predefined style. Better yet if you change a style everything on that one page or the entire site (your choice) inherits that change. So by working in a non-WYSIWYG mode you gain some long term. advantages over how iWeb works. The same is true with positioning. In iWeb it is fast and easy to place things on a page right down to the pixel. RW just doesn't give you that type of precision and next to splitting my site, layout was my biggest frustration with RW. At least to start. But there is a good reason for this "lack of precision" that may not be apparent until you view the site in a browser. When iWeb came out, you really didn't zoom your browser. iWeb uses Absolute Positioning where it uses anchored boxes for everything, whereas RW uses Relative Positioning. Objects with anchored text or picture boxes like iWeb start having problems if you zoom in or out more than one step. Text starts over flowing other text because the text boxes are anchored by one point. Pages just start looking scary if you try to zoom in or out too much. RW is looking at items relative positions and their relationships with one another. So initially you aren't placing the objects in the same way, it is more like eyeballing things in a way. But when viewed in a web browser you can zoom in or out to your heart's content. So what seems at first like a big disadvantage at first for RW, is actually a HUGE advantage.
This is why you need to go with the flow and try to embrace the new way of working. I mentioned earlier that I wasn't able to find a page type that was equivalent to the iWeb album page. I was able to use a very flexible plug-in for RW called stacks, which allows you to create various single and multi-column or multi-row layouts using empty stacks. You then populate the empty stacks with content, pictures text etc. These pages were not like iWeb albums where you nest the Photo Album Pages in the Album page and they create a skimmable preview and an automatic link to the album. Once I actually started making these new "Album" Pages in RW I realized I was gaining as much or more than I was loosing. The skimmable preview pictures was eyecandy I could live without. Nice touch, not essential. I never liked the way the preview picture shown on the Album page was the first photo in the Photo album. You couldn't change this. Now that I am placing my own photo on the Album page, I could use any picture and make it any size I wanted too. In iWeb the Album Caption was the name of the Photo Page. If this name was too long the caption didn't go to a second line, it got cut off. Any link in RW can have a description added to the link which is what you see in the yellow box when you hover your mouse over the item being linked. I used to hide text boxes links under the pictures on the Albums page for SEO and navigation help. So yes now I have to manually link the Album picture to the Photo Page, but I am no longer creating a hidden text box with a link that I have to remember to move when I add pages to the album. So once again my first impression was wrong. Advantage RW.
Another advantage to RW is any page type can have a sidebar. You can easily add favicons and site logos. You can easily add metadata to any page and customized the names of the path to your pages. The Themes can be more powerful and customizable too. About one week into the process I was begining to really go with the flow and see this new way of working had far more advantages for me than disadvantages.
By the time I finished my new RW site, my iWeb site was looking tired and dated. My biggest and most pleasant surprises were saved until the end. Any kind of SEO was a PITA with iWeb. You had to embed snippets on each page with a code from HaloScan or Google Analytics. Problem was, iWeb erased any such HTML code while you were uploading. So you then had to use a regular expression in the text box ("HaloScan goes here"), upload your site and replace the regular expression with the actual code using a 3rd party tool. Oh and don't do that on any blog page where you are using the built in Apple commenting system because the comments will disappear. I also had problems where the new comment badge would not show up for weeks or months after a comment was made. It was getting so the things I had to do AFTER I uploaded my site to MobileMe were taking longer than uploading the site. Once the site was recreated, it was time to add blog comments, a guestbook, a contact form, Google Analytics, and publish a site map. In my iWeb-influenced mind, I was saving the fussy PITA things for last. I was dead wrong. Unlike what you go through with iWeb, it couldn't have been been easier in RW:
-Blog Comments: Set up an account with the provider. Then I had to go into the page setup in RW for my blog page and click on a popup menu of comment providers & select Discus. If your provider isn't listed you paste some HTML code from the provider into a dialogue box provided by RW for the blog page. In my case it was simpler, just set Discus in the popup menu. Now instead of the iWeb badge showing me new posts (and only when it was in the mood), I now get an email.
-Google Analytics: Set up an account with Google. Go to the Stats area in the RW side bar, click on Configure, paste in your code from Google and you are good to go. You can monitor your Google analytics stats right from within RapidWeaver. (Also works this way for GoSquared Live Stats).
-Guestbook: Same as iWeb. You add a page with an HTML snippet from your Guestbook provider in an iFrame.
-Contact Form: This is a RW page type which masks your email address from the spambots by transferring the information to an invisible and inaccessible page within your site. This page then emails you the information.
-Full Site Search: This doesn't exist in iWeb. You can search your blogs right now, but this is one of the features you lose when MobileMe shuts down. By adding an inexpensive Plug in called RapidSearch Pro I enable full site search. You set up a MySQL server for your site. Host Excellence walked me through the 4-Step Process via a well written Help File. You then control what pages are indexed via your sitemap.xml file. You let RapidSearch Pro index your site and you are good to go.
-SiteMap: There is a simple SiteMap generation feature built into RW 5. There are third party tools for doing this for iWeb. I purchased an inexpensive RW plug in called SiteMap plus that not only generates the sitemap.xml file, it allows you to customize what pages get searched and at what frequency. This ties into what is searched via RapidSearch Pro. This plug-in also generates a visible and customizable sitemap page to help your site's users find their way around. Another bonus of being hosted off Mobile Me is when I went to add my sites to my Google account they had already been indexed. It seemed like they never crawled MobileMe unless you told them you wanted them to look at your site.
Link Checking: This doesn't exist in iWeb. I bought another inexpensive plug-in called Link Inspector for RW. It checks all of your internal and external links and generates a report showing the status of all links. This was just what the doctor ordered for my large site. I will run it periodically to make sure external links are still working and that I haven't broken any internal links.
My site was pretty much wrapped up on Monday August 8th. I just had to add in Blog Comments, Google Analytics, the Guestbook, Full Site Search and the Site Map. I figured I would go public on Tuesday or Wednesday. To my great pleasure these 5 items took all of 2 hours to get set up and working. This was a nice touch after 2 months of hard work.
So there you have it. This is the process I went through converting my site over to RapidWeaver. Your mileage may vary. I am not pushing RapidWeaver for everyone. You have to find what program is the right fit for you. You may find staying with iWeb on a new host is the right fit for you. You need to decide if you can live with the features you lose once you aren't hosted on Mobile Me. For me there was great pain, but in the end there was a lot of gain too. I do like my new site and I feel it will serve me well for years to come. Good luck to all of you in whatever path you choose. Lastly thanks one last time to the helpful folks around here
Jim
http://grillinsmokin.net
Message was edited by: Jim Mahoney

Thanks Roddy. I agree with your take on some of the other software you mentioned, at least from the perspective of having dabbled with demo versions of some of the others. I will add that with Sandvox I felt a little nervous about it. Kind of almost like the software was a "hobby" effort a la the first gen Apple TV.
I also agree with some of your points regarding RapidWeaver. But now that I've built my rather large (for a hobbyist site) website with it I will have to respectfully disagree about it being at the same level as iWeb, or as you put it: a sideways move. While iWeb can be made to do things it was never originally meant to do, there are many places it simply can't go that RapidWeaver can. I was often hitting the limits of what you could do in iWeb, whereas with RapidWeaver, with one exception, I didn't feel like I was running up against any limits yet. The exception is it's lack of ability to handle large sites well. That was almost the deal breaker for me. I find it unexplainable that a software package with all kinds of add-ons helping you make more ambitious sites, can't handle those same sites in a single file. This was almost a deal-breaker for me. For folks who have small to medium sized iWeb sites this isn't a concern. There are also ways to warehouse images on the server to keep file size down, but this gets more complex than many folks coming from iWeb would want to do. Me splitting my site up the way I did was more work than I wanted to do.I almost bagged the whole thing and was close to just taking the old site down.
Now if we were to fantasize for a minute I can think of a way where I could also say iWeb to RapiWeaver is a sideways move: While I don't think iWeb '09 is the equal to RapidWeaver 5, I'd bet that iWeb 11 or the oft rumored iWeb Pro might have been. I kept hoping that Apple would keep pushing the limits of what iWeb could do and add in some missing features and head down the HTML 5 road.
I will conditionally agree on your saying that the shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. I will qualify that by saying: Depending on what you are doing with it, your shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. With one exception, I do think the base package of RapidWeaver is fairly priced. I think the basic Stacks functionality and a few basic stacks should be part of RapidWeaver. The more esoteric stacks can be pay as you go. When iLife 11 was announced without a an update to iWeb, I did some preliminary pricing and I was rather discouraged at the total. This spring I got more serious about things and repriced RapidWeaver and add-ons. After trying out various themes and plug-ins, I was able to sharpen my pencil and reduce the cost of entry considerably. One of the things that helped is the theme I bought had a couple features built into it. It had a nice lightbox type slideshow for photo pages and animated banners/headers capabilities built in. This saved me the expense of several additional plug-ins. Also while I have a blog, I don't consider myself a blogger. I was able to use the built in blog page and I don't feel limited by it at all. Some of the other ad-ons I bought: such as the link checker, site wide search and a more sophisticated sitemap generator were items I added because I could tell I would want to keep the site going long term. Those 3 plug-ins did that a a low price. I didn't think they needed to be built in.
But everyone's mileage may vary. RapidWeaver or any other web design program isn't right for every iWeb user. It all depends on personal needs, abilities and budgets. I'm just glad I can get back to posting to the site and not recreating it.
Jim

How can I get information of the switched channel in an example program from NI?

When I use the example program "niSwitch DMM Switch Synchronous Scanning.vi", I'am not able to get any information, wich channel is active. Wich block has to be used and how must I connect it to see this.
The other one is, that te sytax for the scan list, described in the help does not switch through the channel, how has this to be modified?
Im using a SCXI 1128 in Slot 8 of a 1052 combo chassis and the DMM is a PXI 4070 in the Slot 2.
Attachments:
niSwitch DMM Switch Synchronous Scanning.vi ‏145 KB

Bigmatzeman,
finally, i got a working solution which should suite you!
Ok, here is what you have to do/what is missing in your setup:
First, you can leave the modules as they are already inserted in your chassis.
Second, you will need a special AUX-cable to synchronize the DMM and the switch. You can find infos on that here
in the section "Single Module Scanning". Connect the cable between the
DMM and the front connector of the switch (1331, scanadv. and
externaltrig.)
Third, i advise you to use the HV8-BAN4-cable to connected the signals
to your DMM. This is because the cable is specified for the appropriate
voltage the DMM and the switch are capable of (300 V). The connection
of the HV8 can be done in the 1052 above the PXI-slots.
And at last, open the example "niSwitch DMM Switch Handshaking.vi", set
the devices to the appropriate identifiers. Select for both triggers
for the DMM "External" and for both triggers of the switch "Front
Connector". Change the Scanlist to "ch0:5->com0;". If you are using
the HV8-BAN4 instead of direct front connector-connection, you have to
change the code a bit, too: insert a "niSwitch Connect Channels" VI in
front of the "niSwitch Configure Scan Trigger" which connects "ab0" and
"com0".
Ok, now the example should work correctly and you should be able to use all other SCXI modules together with your 6281.
Hope this helps,
Norbert
[Edit]: My setup was 4072, 6052E, 1127 and 1011 (instead of 4070, 6281,
1128 and 1052 as you do). But that should work just the same way.
Message Edited by Norbert B on 08-04-2006 10:36 AM
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

How come the switch user option is missing from my lock screen?

I upgrade to Lion my iMac Core 2 Duo and now when I lock the screen the switch user option is missing from the lock screen, you just have to cancel o renter as the original user, so that if another member of my family wants to switch and use the mac he or she cannot do it.
This is what I am talking about (image taken from a lion review): http://dl.dropbox.com/u/134544/forum/Schermata%2007-2455766%20alle%2011.05.12.pn g
The switch user option is totaly absent, I just have the cancel.
It that a bug or what?
Please note this happens only when I lock the screen from the screensaver, i.e. requesting the password to restart from the screensaver, if I get to the login windows all users appears correctly and people can switch back and forth.
Thank you.
– cordialmente,
tiziano solignani, da  Mac
http://ts.solignani.it (splash)
http://goo.gl/p6Sb0 (libri)

I just talked to apple support. They said Lion doesn't support this feature. They gave me a work-around, which was to disable requiring a password in the screen saver. Then enable user switching so it appears in the top right of the banner. Note that since the screen saver no longer locks the screen, in order to actually lock the screen the user must click on the upper right user list and select something like "Login user...".
This issue has left me disappointed with apple for a few reasons. Hopefully someone at apple will take note:
1. Apple removed a useful feature.
2. Apple did not provide a response to this thread which would have been the best forum to inform users of this change. It would have saved me and apple one long phone call.

I have two pnones on my account...my iPhone 4 and my wife's crappy old Samsung. I pre-ordered an iPhone 4S and plan to give my iPhone 4 to my wife and I will use the new 4S. How do I switch the 4 to her number once I make the switch to a new 4S?

I have two pnones on my account...my iPhone 4 and my wife's crappy old Samsung. I pre-ordered an iPhone 4S and plan to give my iPhone 4 to my wife and I will use the new 4S. How do I switch the 4 to her number once I make the switch to a new 4S?

Just call yur provider and they will set it up with you.
This is what I do, when I get a new iphone and give mine to my wife.

About a month ago my wifi switch greyed out. I went through all the trouble shooting and ended up going to the Genius Bar and got a new iPhone 4S. Now the switch greyed out on the new one.. help!

About a month ago my wifi switch greyed out. I went through all the trouble shooting and ended up going to the Genius Bar and got a new iPhone 4S. Now the switch greyed out on the new one.. help!
I've had my new one for less than 3 weeks. What gives? I'm loosing faith in apple

no body?

With the switch to tab feature, is there a way to enable it for clicking bookmarks in the bookmarks bar?

say using the site meebo, if i receive a message and click the bookmark instead of the tab is there a way to have it open the tab already in progress instead of opening a new instance of meebo?

The switch to tab feature is only available when you are typing in the Location (a.k.a. Awesome) bar. Clicking on a bookmark will always open the bookmarked page in either the current tab or a new tab.

I created a playlist with 100 songs. I want those 100 songs played using the shuffle option. This no longer works in iTunes version 11.1.5.5 How can I get an entire playlist to paly one song after another by using the switch option?

I created a playlist with 100 songs. I want those 100 songs played using the shuffle option. This no longer works in iTunes version 11.1.5.5 How can I get an entire playlist to paly one song after another by using the switch option?

You're welcome.
Going back to your original post:
5) Tried running Itunes in 'safe mode', running itunes as an administrator..nothing.
Was that iTunes' safe mode as opposed to Windows' safe mode? iTunes safe mode is invoked by holding down CTRL+SHIFT immediately after clicking the icon to launch iTunes and continuing to hold until this message pops up:
Click continue, then close iTunes and reopen. With luck iTunes now opens normally every time.
tt2

When I get a phone call or text message it will not make the sound. Just vibrate. But the switch is on normal. When I change it to vibrate the volume thing will not show. Nor will my up volume up key work. Is there any way to fix it?

When I get a phone call or text message it will not make the sound. Just vibrate. But the switch is on normal. When I change it to vibrate the volume thing will not show. Nor will my up volume up key work. Is there any way to fix it?

Basic troubleshooting from the User's Guide is reset, restart, restore (first from backup then as new). Try each of these in order until the issue is resolved.

My 5th gen nano is stuck in hold mode. Toggling the switch does not work, help!

I've tried everything suggested on apples website, and nothing is working. My ipod is stuck in hold mode. I've tried toggling the switch, that doesn't work, I've tried pressing select/play, it is unresponsive. I've tried restoring to factory defaults, and also uninstalling/reinstalling iTunes. Please help.

It's likely a hardware malfunction with the lock switch itself. Either way, you'll need to have the iPod serviced either by Apple or a third party repair company.
There is no other way to troubleshoot this issue. Sorry.
B-rock

The switch to udev

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for