The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this upgrade

Hi Guru,
I' am doing prepare : upgrade from R/3 entrerprise 47X100 to ECC6.0 SR3.
PREPARE
02)                       Initialization     failed        yes
the checks.log report the following error :
SAPup> WARNING: The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this
upgrade (> 2005_1_700).
                To avoid loss of data it is necessary to include the latest avai
lable version for the Add-on
                in the IS_SELECT phase.
                Please refer to Add-on note 69455 for further information.
I can't go on , How can I include the add-on in the upgrade ? the phase for include the add-on upgrade is  04) Extension   but  i cannot skip phase 2    ? ! ? !
OSS note 69455 does not contain valid information.
thank's for the answer.
Regards Antonio.

Hi
I got the same error and it actually prevents from getting further, because its treated as an error.
"ERROR: To be able to use ASU Toolbox, your system requires at
       least Support Package Level 8 for the ST-PI software component
       For more information, see the upgrade documentation
WARNING: The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this upgrade (> 2005_1_700).
         To avoid loss of data it is necessary to include the latest available version for the Add-on
         in the IS_SELECT phase.
         Please refer to Add-on note 69455 for further information."
2008_1_620 does not have a level 8, so it must be refering to the 2005 version of ST-PI.
Update SAPup.exe (in <upgrade dir>/bin) to newest version.
Regards
Kim
Edited by: Kim Hynek on Mar 30, 2010 11:36 AM
Edited by: Kim Hynek on Mar 30, 2010 11:40 AM

Similar Messages

  • Batch Rename... how do I keep the version number [NOT the version name]?

    Hi!
    I've finally made up my mind about renaming my img. names in Aperture, and I would like to have something like "Travel San Francisco 2005 version x 1.CR2", where "version x" is the number which Aperture automatically adds whenever I make a change to an image. This is then followed by a number which automatically increases by one for every new image: 1, 2, 3, 4... etc. until there are no more images to choose from in the current project.
    My problem is that I cannot figure out how to get Aperture to keep the, for me, very helpful "version 1, 2, ..." info attached to the images during renaming. In the Batch rename dialog box I am able to choose "Version Name" but that only gives me the current name of the selected image which I do not want. Aperture just replaces the "version x" in the image name.
    Can anyone help me, or am I asking for something that cannot be done in Aperture?
    Kind regards
    Heine
    DP 2GHz G5   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   3G Memory, BlueTooth, Aiport, 20" Cinema Display

    HI, there:
    I like answering these easy ones. Too often the questions regarding Aperture can't be solved as of yet becasue it's a bug or a lacking feature.
    Anyway, when you import your files, look for the sidebar that has all the options on it. Look for a spot that says "Name Format." When you get there, there should be a drop down menu that will allow you to choose a variety of options. One of the options is "custom name with counter." Aperture will automatically assign each image a custom name and a numerical number starting with 1 and incrementing by 1 for a maximum of 999. You can change the options for this by selecting "edit" from the drop down menu.
    Cheers

  • Why does the LDAP/AD RA convert adds to modifies. How do I prevent this!

    hellos.
    I have noticed that if I attempt to add an LDAP entry which has the same DN as an existing entry, then the default Provisioning workflow SILENTLY converts this add to a modify.
    template: cn=$fullname$,ou=people,dc=company1,dc=com
    so if 2 different persons with same first and lastnames are entered into IdM first one gets added Ok but then gets hijacked by the second 'addition'.
    ok. I understand that I have to cater for this eventuality, but isnt the whole point of using an intelligent system like IdM to trap these events automatically.
    I would rather see an error message like "error code 68: object already exists" on the screen after screen entry + save than end up with 2 different Idm entities pointing to the same LDAP entry!!
    Is it possible to set a switch (waveset property?) allowing/denying the convert add to modify when the target already exists?
    Must I have to either rewrite the provisioning workflow or plug in some fullname validation on the form?

    It does not matter what you intend to do or not: the identity template is there to tell IDM how the resource account should be identified. The software has no "knowledge" of your intentions. It uses the configuration you gave it to create the account you are requesting. If that should not happen in all cases then you will have to handle that.
    The fact that you provision to the resource also shows that you do not see the resource as the authoritive source of data.
    IDM does not assume or preempt that the account already exists on the resource. If it finds that the account already exists when it checks the resource it has to follow what you have configured it to do. In this case that is create the account you wanted it to create. To make sure that the account contains the information you want it to contain it will modify/add the values which are missing and or different.
    The fact that the resource account is already there is not an error situation and will never be one. It is considered as being a normal case with a normal solution: IDM takes hold of the account. If it would be an error case there would be no need for reconciliation or active sync. You can even go a step further and state that the account on LDAP should not have existed if you try to create the user this way, reconcile or active sync should take care of these kinds of accounts.
    For the sharing part: IDM understands that resources can contain shared accounts, it even has a state for them in the reconciliation. But when you create an user in IDM and assign resources the accounts on the resources automatically belong to the user in IDM. This has to be enforced otherwise there would never be a guarantee that an user whom has a resource assigned also really has the account.
    If you want IDM to fail in situations like this then you have to code that yourself and customise the workflow or forms used for the provisioning process. By doing that you will create a huge amount of manual intervention to create the accounts in a later stage unless you can make the work flow smart enough to cycle through a number of possible resource account Id values if the account already exists on the resource.
    This will almost certainly also kill any possibilities to run a reconcile against that resource because you can not catch this in correlation rules or confirmation rules.
    Then a user form does not go out and see if the account already exists. The form provides logic and a display template for information. The provisioner and the userviewer will do al the processing.
    If you really want to leave the existing account alone then there are two options you can set as form properties, only one can be used at anytime:
    "NoLinking"
    "InteractiveLinking"
    like this:
    <Form .....>
    <Properties>
    <Property name='InteractiveLinking' value='true'/>
    </Properties>
    If you specify "NoLinking" the provisioning will go ahead and the user will get accounts on all resources where there were no conflicts, no intercation possible.
    If you specify "InteractiveLinking" your checkin of the userview will fail and you will be returned to the GUI. At that point you will have to fix the issues that were found before any provisioning will take place. This requires custom forms and all handling needs to be done by the user. Have a look for DiscoveredAccountFields in the libraries
    This was build into the product after a push from one customer and has never been documented outside of one release note. It will become part of the standard docs from version 7 onwards. However it is still considered as a bad solution but if you want it you can use it.
    WilfredS

  • I finished adding my transtions to my timeline.  I was having crashing issues so I shut down everything before I rendered the project and now it tells me that the project is unreadable or the file is too new for this version of final cut. What Happened?

    I finished adding my transtions to my timeline.  I was having crashing issues so I shut down everything before I rendered the project and now it tells me that the project is unreadable or the file is too new for this version of final cut. What Happened?

    What Happened?
    No way for us to know.  But if your system was crashing, there definitely was a problem.  The FCE error message you got normally indicates the FCE project file has been corrupted.  This probably happened due to whatever caused your system to crash & shutting down the system.
    First, make sure your system is running correctly.  Then, use the Finder to navigate to /users/yourusername/Documents/Final Cut Express Documents/Autosave Vault and find the most recent backup copy of your FCE project file.  Copy the file to your Final Cut Express Documents folder (copy the file, don't just move it).  Then double-click the copy to open it in FCE.  It should open ok, but will probably not have your most recent edits (transitions).  You may have to rebuild the transitions, but at least you will be back in action.

  • I have the version of itunes the ios 7 update requires but every time i try to update my phone it says i need the itunes version 11.0.5 but i already have it?

    i have the version of itunes the ios 7 update requires but every time i try to update my phone it says i need the itunes version 11.0.5 but i already have it?

    You need iTunes 11.1 which is not available for download in google chrome or other browsers.  The only browser it has worked for with me is Safari.  Hope this helps!

  • Can't open Project - The file format is too new for this version of the pro

    Hi everyone
    I have the following Problem with my Final Cut Express: When I try to open a project i get an error message: "The file format is too new for this version of the program". (my FCE is in german, this is the google translation!)
    I have already erased all the rendering files, but no luck.
    Please Help!

    Have you recently reinstalled FCE and forgotten to update it?

  • How do I change the Version Code in the Flash Android settings Android app market?

    I recently tried to update my app in the Android app market and when I uploaded it I got the following message:
    "The new apk's versionCode (1000000) already exists."
    In the Flash Adnroid settings I changed the version label but that did not help.
    So I have two questions:
    How do I change the Version code in the Flash Android settings? I changed the version number and version label but that did not work.
    What is the difference between the version number and version label?

    I tried that but it did not work. Apparently there is a difference between the version code and version number (which is set in the Android settings). From my research the version label is optional, so there are no problems there.
    This is the what the XML file says:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
    <application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/2.6">
      <id>com.company.nameofapp</id>
    //Below is the correct version number, but has no relation to the version code.
      <versionNumber>1.1.0</versionNumber>
      <versionLabel>NewLayout</versionLabel>
      <filename>Name of app</filename>
      <description/>
    I did find this piece of information for Androin version codes. (http://developer.android.com/guide/publishing/versioning.html)  But I don't know how to place it into the xml file without conflicting with other code.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
          package="com.example.package.name"
          android:versionCode="2"
          android:versionName="1.1">
        <application android:icon="@drawable/icon" android:label="@string/app_name">
        </application>
    </manifest>
    Any other thoughts are much appreciated.

  • How do I change the Version Code in the Flash Android settings for the Android app Market?

    I recently tried to update my app in the Android app market and when I uploaded it I got the following message:
    "The new apk's versionCode (1000000) already exists."
    In the Flash Adnroid settings I changed the version label but that did not help.
    So I have two questions:
    How do I change the Version code in the Flash Android settings? I changed the version number and version label but that did not work.
    What is the difference between the version number and version label?

    I tried that but it did not work. Apparently there is a difference between the version code and version number (which is set in the Android settings). From my research the version label is optional, so there are no problems there.
    This is the what the XML file says:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
    <application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/2.6">
      <id>com.company.nameofapp</id>
    //Below is the correct version number, but has no relation to the version code.
      <versionNumber>1.1.0</versionNumber>
      <versionLabel>NewLayout</versionLabel>
      <filename>Name of app</filename>
      <description/>
    I did find this piece of information for Androin version codes. (http://developer.android.com/guide/publishing/versioning.html)  But I don't know how to place it into the xml file without conflicting with other code.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
          package="com.example.package.name"
          android:versionCode="2"
          android:versionName="1.1">
        <application android:icon="@drawable/icon" android:label="@string/app_name">
        </application>
    </manifest>
    Any other thoughts are much appreciated.

  • File's format is too new for this version of the application

    A project that was edited in FCE on an iMac will not open in FCE on a MacBook Pro. When I try to open it, I receive the error: File's format is too new for this version of the application.
    The FCE that was installed on the MacBook Pro is exactly same copy as the one loaded onto the above mentioned iMac -- they were each were installed from the same, Apple Store purchased disk.
    Thanks for any help.
    -Mike

    Hi(Bonjour)!
    Did you apply the FCE 4.0.1 update on both machines?
    Michel Boissonneault

  • TS2611 I re installed my Final Cut express software, now when I go to use my "halo" and "arrow" application I get a message that says the file format is too new for this version of the application.  Anybody have suggestions?

    I re installed my Final Cut express software, now when I go to use my "halo" and "arrow" application I get a message that says the file format is too new for this version of the application.  Anybody have suggestions?

    After install, did you go to  Apple menu > Software Update to update your FCE to the latest version?
    MtD

  • I can not return the version stored in the ICloud

    I can not return the version stored in the ICloud  for new IPhone

    What exactly are you trying to do?  Restore from an icloud backup?  If so what error message are you getting?
    Giving more details about your issue would go a long way.

  • Hi I have iPhone 4 with iOS 6 and a week ago I stop ressiv or send SMS. I tried everything but I still can't send.. I erase the version and all the data on the iPhone and now I can send SMS. But when I'm downloading my buck up the problem happened againI'

    Hi I have iPhone 4 with iOS 6 and a week ago I stop ressiv or send SMS. I tried everything but I still can't send.. I erase the version and all the data on the iPhone and now I can send SMS. But when I'm downloading my buck up the problem happened again
    Please help me cuse I don't know what to do and my cellular company don't have an answer
    Thank u

    I have to ad that its not an easy problem I did all the action in the book.
    It's something with my back up

  • Osxfusefs] does not match the UUID of the version loaded in the kernel

    Hello,
      does anyone know what could this warning means?
    WARNING: The file at [/Library/Filesystems/osxfusefs.fs/Support/osxfusefs.kext/Contents/MacOS/osxfus efs] does not match the UUID of the version loaded in the kernel
    I ran "sudo iotop" to see disk activity for all processes. Is it some disk driver launched under different UUID as was expected by kernel? Could it cause some OS stability issues?

    Hello,
    There is a possibility that you have activate line item display for some of the accounts at a later stage. Meaning that earlier postings were not be shown for the earlier postings but only totals will be made available. Therefore, obviously there is bound to be difference between line item report and totals report.
    You need to identify which accounts are being changed with line item display at a later stage.
    In case if you forget to keep GL Line item display for an account, but the posting are already made the following steps you would required to get the line item display retrospectively.
    1. Note that you are NOT required to make the balance of that GL account to ZERO. Please do not confuse with Open Item Management.
    2. Put the check box line item display for the account in FS00. Make sure you are entering right company code.
    3. Block the account for posting in COA Segment and Company Code Segment in FS00
    4. Go to SA38 and run program RFSEPA01 (Give correct GL Account and Company Code)
    5. Now, remove the block you kept on the GL Account in FS00.
    This will reset the line item display retrospectively.
    Hope this will solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Error - The version number in the package is not valid. The version number cannot be greater than current version number

    whats does this error mean
    i download 2008 r2 and try to open package but still getting error
    Error 1
    Error loading  The version number in the package is not valid. The version number cannot be greater than current version number.  
    Error 2
    Error loading Package migration from version 8 to version 3 failed with error 0xC001700A "The version number in the package is not valid. The version number cannot be greater than current version number.".  

    can you tell me which version it is >
    i try to fix in dtexec
    getting following error :
    Started:  2:02:13 PM
    Error: 2015-01-30 14:02:14.68
       Code: 0xC000F427
       Source: Member Eligibility
       Description: To run a SSIS package outside of SQL Server Data Tools you must
    install Member Eligibility of Integration Services or higher.
    End Error
    Warning: 2015-01-30 14:02:14.69
       Code: 0x80019002
     Description: SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED.  The Execution
     method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (2) reached the maximum allow
    ed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the
    number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the e
    rrors.
    End Warning
    DTExec: The package execution returned DTSER_FAILURE (1).
    Started:  2:02:13 PM
    Finished: 2:02:14 PM
    i cannot upgrade original package

  • The version of the LabVIEW NI SoftMotion Module installed on the host differs from the version installed on the RT target.

    Hi,
    i got this problem when i want to deploy the project with softmotion 
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/at9r9w667i00qja/qqqqqq.png
    NI SoftMotion:  The version of the LabVIEW NI SoftMotion Module installed on the host differs from the version installed on the RT target. 

    Hi Eng.Tareq
    It would be better if you can give more information
    1. What is the software version are you using?
    2. What is your target hardware?
    You can check the above information by open MAX -> under software tab of both computer and you target
    I suspect that the software version of your host computer and the target is difference as state in the picture attached.
    TuiTui

Maybe you are looking for