The watermark "Preliminary, Draft, not for production use"

Hi
Just curious, I see the watermark "Preliminary, Draft, not for production use" on the following page :
http://agriculture.tennessee.edu/facultyandstaff/forms/LeaveForm.pdf
Is this generated when right-enabled is applied and the owner use evaluation version of Adobe Document Server? or because of other cause?
Anybody knows?
Thanks

Yes, it's because of the use of an evaluation version of some software.. probably Reader Extensions.
Chris
Adobe Enterprise Developer Support

Similar Messages

How do you remove this: META NAME="ColdFusionMXEdition" CONTENT="ColdFusion DevNet Edition - Not for Production Use."

Hi,
How do you remove this: <META NAME="ColdFusionMXEdition"
CONTENT="ColdFusion DevNet Edition - Not for Production
Use."> since it
automatically generates in my code when i run the application
and it
generates an error in the page.

Deinstall the devnet version, and install the proper version.
Adam

[NX6200AX-TD128] Firmware: engineering release not for production use

Hi,
i just got my MSI NX6200AX-TD128 (602-V011-010) card
B0505000867
and it shows this bootup firmware info:
BIOS 5.44.A2.02.00 engineering release not for production use
Why is MSI selling these cards with a firmware like this?
Why there is no updated firmware for download?
(searched here: http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/download/dld/spt_dld_detail.php?UID=679&kind=2 )
Where can i download a retail fw?
TIA
TIA

Quote from: fabianzd on 07-August-05, 20:58:50
This is a user to user forum and MSI does not read or participate in these forums.
You need to contact MSI directly to get answers about this BIOS...
I see... thank you.
Quote from: fabianzd on 07-August-05, 20:58:50
But... why overclock a 6200 video card??? I really doubt that you get a better performance in games or 3D app's with this video card.
Quote from: Richard on 07-August-05, 22:20:30
Trying to overclock a 6200 is like trying to Supe up a Yugo. What is the point, there is nothing you could do to it, to make it play today's games.
Take Care,
Richard
here are some articles about overclocking the 6200:
6200 (NV43):
http://www.digital-daily.com/video/peredelki/
A6200 (NV44A):
http://www.digital-daily.com/video/nv-gf6200agp-roundup/
too bad that i found these articles after i spent my money.
next time i'll do some research before buying and not after... :P
later.

BIOS Update for nVidia GTX 550 Ti? I have a BIOS "not for production use"

Hi,
I bought a new computer about a month ago, and it all works well, but every now and then, the whole system freezes completely for 2-4 minutes, and then afterwards resumes where it was. This is extremely annoying, and it really could be anything, I don't have evidence that it's the video card, but I'm trying to get everything updated to the latest version.
When my computer boots up, I see this message:
GF116 P1050 SKU 0 VGA BIOS
MSIMV261MS.105Version 70.26.20.00.00
Engineering Release - Not for Production Use
Build Date: 02/23/11
Revision Date: 02/16/11
Copyright © 1996-2011 NVIDIA Corp.
So, evidently this BIOS is wrong, and i'm trying to update it, but I can't find where to download an update.
Could you please point me in the right direction?
Thank you
Daniel Magliola

Quote from: dmagliola on 07-May-11, 21:59:57
When my computer boots up, I see this message:
GF116 P1050 SKU 0 VGA BIOS
MSIMV261MS.105Version 70.26.20.00.00
Engineering Release - Not for Production Use
Build Date: 02/23/11
Revision Date: 02/16/11
Copyright © 1996-2011 NVIDIA Corp.
I noticed the same thing... BUT I made 2 mistakes:
Failed to make a copy of this BIOS using GPU-Z
Updated to 1.06 via MSI Update 5 (26110.rom)
Then I read the posts on this subforum and realized my mistakes.
I'm just in the initial stages of installing software on this machine, so I haven't noticed any problems.
I saved the updated BIOS via GPU-Z and compared the hashes against the 1.06 BIOS offered by MSI on their page for this card (NV261MS.106) ==> they matched MD5: 52ECDDEFAEA86E745C09FF8A43541078
Afterburner 2.1.0 gives the following info:
Quote
Display device : GeForce GTX 550 Ti on GF116 GPU
Display driver : ForceWare 266.71
BIOS : 70.26.20.00.00
GUID : VEN_10DE&DEV_1244&SUBSYS_26101462&REV_A1&BUS_1&DEV_0&FN_0
My question is how badly did I mess up and what should I do now?
Thanks in advance.

'engineering release: not for production use

this message, related to some VGA bios or something, appears when i first boot my k7n2g-ilsr (no i dont have any add-on cards in it). i must say, it does not inspire much confidence in me to see this message on my brand new 150 dollar motherboard. anyone have any ideas about this? just an accidental oversight during manufacturing?

Fill out an online technical support form at:
http://www.msicomputer.com/msiforms/c_problem_desc_form3.asp.
Explain that you have a reference BIOS, and that you need to upgrade to the latest revision. I did this for my 6200 that had the same problem; within one business day, MSI emailed me a new BIOS. For those of you that have the MSI NX6200AX 128, you can download the BIOS they sent me from my website:
http://dclayton.com/shared/nvflash.zip
This file is a .ZIP archive that contains a few files, most notably, a program called nvflash.exe with the latest image file. For non-Windows users, I presume you will have to create a boot floppy. Since I have a Linux-based system, I'm going to have to do this I guess. (Do not try this on any model of video other card - I don't know if the BIOS flash program will even let you.)
Since this file is 200k+, please don't slurp my bandwidth by downloading it repeatedly or posting the URL to slashdot, etc. If I remove this file in the future, please msg me and I'll try to get it to you. But, you should have no problems if you contact MSI in the manner I indicated above.
Good luck!

HP Laserjet1012 only prints Not For Commercial Use

Have HP Laserjet 1012 installed on Dell Latitute E6410 running Windows 7. Found a You Tube video for setup. Using port DOT4_001, and HP Laserjet0355 PCL5(Microsoft) driver.
Problem: whentyou print test page, the printout has a black background and Not For Commercial Use printed on a diagonal in white.
If you open a document to print, it spools to this printer but the message is this Not for Cummercial Use.
Any ideas???

Perhaps the application you are using (Word?) is generating the watermark; or perhaps a watermark setting in the printer driver settings?
What happens if you try to print a simple text document from NotePad?

"The serial number is not for a qualifying product. Please try another"

I purchased, downloaded, install and am using successfully
ADOBE ACROBAT XI PRO
Version (11.0.07)
Installed 12.02.14
Purchased 12.02.14
Adobe Acrobat XI Pro (Windows, English)
I have tried unsuccessfully to register 6+ times
I receive the message:
The SN is not recognized (error statement= "The serial number is not for a qualifying product. Please try another")
I have a total of about 5 sessions that amounts to about one hour trying to solve a problem, navigating your website, going into endless cycles, and have noticed there is no way to call a phone number to fix a problem.
Is this the new Adobe Paradigm?
It appears to be an administrative problem with Adobe
What is the fix?
Please advise

The message means that you have an upgrade license. You just need to prove you are eligible by entering the serial number of the Acrobat 9 or X license that you have - that is the "qualifying" product. It is not asking you to enter the Acrobat XI license again, you already did that.

Just got a new MacMini. Migrated files using Time Machine. However, now, on Launchpad, I see several Firmware updates that were relevant for the old machine, but not for the new one. How do I get rid of these updates? They won't delete!

Just got a new MacMini. Migrated files using Time Machine. However, now, on Launchpad, I see several Firmware updates that were relevant for the old machine, but not for the new one. How do I get rid of these updates? They won't delete!

Only thing I can think of is trying this Lion trick...
http://www.cultofmac.com/106030/how-to-nuke-lions-launchpad-and-start-over/10603 0/

I am traveling to Italy from U.S. and bought American Tourister Worldwide Adaptor Plug for my iPhone 5 andiPad 2. The instructions saying is not for use with grounded plugs and can only be connected with non-grounding circuits. Will this adaptor work?

I am traveling to Italy and bought an American Tourister Worldwide Adaptor a plug for my iPhone 5 and iPad 2. The instructions say it is not for grounding use and not for use with grounded plugs. Will this work?

That adaptor should work.

Open note for S_ALR_87008272 using program RKAZUTR1

Hi Experts,
Please provide open note for S_ALR_87008272 using program RKAZUTR1, to run S_ALR_87008272 in Quality and Production client.
Thanks
Neeraja

Hi,
The t.code S_ALR_87008272 is used to maintain overhead percentages.
Once the percentages maintained in Development system, those percentages will come automatically via request number.
For that purpose you have to run this program RKAZUTR1 via se38 t.code with request number.
Regards
Ravi Polampalli

Web Service Developer Pack for production use?

Hello,
Can anyone tell me what the licensing is for use of the web services developer pack reference implementations? Can they be used in a production environment, or are they for development purposes only?
Any information is appreciated.
Holly

The JWSDP can be used for production use. It is not just
a reference implementation. The exception is the bundled
UDDI registry which is just for testing development.

Is SAP on Linux mature enough for productive use ?

Hi
Im not quite sure if this is the correct forum for this question But Ill risk it anyway
We are starting a SAP project from scratch and my manager has asked if we could run the solution on Linux. I know that Linux is supported by SAP, but is the solution mature enough for productive use? Do any off you have any experience with this ?
Regards,
Morten Nielsen
Message was edited by: Morten Nielsen

We have SAP (DEV, QAS, PRD, APP1 and APP2) on RHEL 4.0 ES + RH Cluster Suite and 80% of our clients on Fedora Core 4 and 5.
System environment ***
SAP Release:          "640"
Application server:     "sapprd"
Network address:     "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"
Operating system:     "Linux"
Release:          "2.6.9-22.ELsmp"
Hardware type:          "x86_64"
Character length:     "8 Bits"
Pointer length:          "64 Bits"
Work process number:     "0"
Short dump setting:     "full"
Character set:          "th_TH.TIS-620"
SAP kernel:          "640"
Created on:          "May 22 2006 19:43:45"
Created in:          "Linux GNU SLES-9 x86_64 cc3.3.3"
Database version:     "SAPDB 7.5.0.035"

Recommendation of use for MaxDB for production use and Oracle comparison

Hi all,
We are about to propose to a customer of ours the use of SAPDB for production use. This would be a good way to reduce license costs.
Previous use of this DB platform has shown that it is mature, but since I am not a basis or DBA, I can't really pinpoint if we miss a lot of functionality.
Who could provide some info on the following:
1 - Are there major functionalities that Oracle provides that MaxDB doesn't?
2 - Customer reference (or your inputs) on success stories.
Thanks in advance.
Leonardo

> Who could provide some info on the following:
>
> 1 - Are there major functionalities that Oracle provides that MaxDB doesn't?
I would ask:"What functionalities do you expect from a database system?" - and then "Can MaxDB provide those functionalities?". It does not makes sense, IMHO, to compare "possible" things if you never need them.
> 2 - Customer reference (or your inputs) on success stories.
We run MaxDB (former ADABAS D, former SAPDB) for 12 years now on all our systems. Our main ERP 6.0 EHP4 has a size of 3 TB, we run on Linux serving about 900 users (700 concurrent), a BI with roughly 1 TB (with BWA), CRM with 600 GB, and tons of portals and smaller systems (SRM, SRM-MDM 7.1, GTS 7.2, SolMan, PLM (cProjects), Content Servers and more).
There are, as with every database, "performance problems" in special areas but generally our response times are below 500 ms on the main ERP.
One drawback of the MaxDB is the fact, that it does not use UTF-8/CESU-8 to store the data (yet) so if you use only single byte codepages in a Unicode system, you will neverless consume the full 2-byte space per character.
Basically I think that you can run roughly 98 % of the current systems on MaxDB without any impacts.
Markus

Is sql as a language free for production use ?

is sql and pl/sql as a languages free for production use ?
and if you wanna help me , tell me about programming languages in general ?
thanks in advance

semsem wrote:
is sql and pl/sql as a languages free for production use ?The questions don't make sense. What is important is whether the database allows production use, not the language.
First, SQL is a standard. Every database vendor implements their own, slightly different, SQL dialect. Whether SQL is free depends on what database you're referring to and how that database is licensed. There are tons of open source databases (i.e. MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc) that support a dialect of SQL and can be used in production at no cost. If you are talking about Oracle, it depends on the edition of the database and the terms of the license. If you have the express edition (Oracle XE), you can use that database's SQL engine in production at no cost.
PL/SQL is Oracle's procedural extensions to SQL. As with SQL, though, what is important is how the database that implements the PL/SQL VM is licensed. That, in turn, depends on the edition of the database just like it does for SQL. If you have the express edition (Oracle XE), you can use that database's PL/SQL engine in production at no cost.
and if you wanna help me , tell me about programming languages in general ?Here, it's even less clear what you're asking.
Most languages are free to use. Many languages or deployment scenarios, however, require you to license something else in order to actually run code written in that language. You can, for example, write and use a .Net application free of charge. But since your application relies on the .Net libraries that come with Windows, you would need to license Windows on the machine you are running the application (or run a Linux box with Mono and hope that everything you need from the CLR has been ported). You can find free JVMs to run Java applications on most platforms. But if you want to run a Java stored procedure inside Oracle, you'd need to license Oracle. If you want to run a Java object on a JEE app server, you'll need a JEE app server (many of which require you to obtain a license for commercial deployments).
Justin

Can CC subscribers install LR CC for evaluation and keep LR5.7 for production use?

I'd like to evaluate LR CC, but have plugins that aren't yet compatible with it. Therefore, I want to keep LR5.7 for production use. Is this possible?

Yes, LR 6 will convert (by making a copy) your catalog, and you can then edit in the new version. You must take some caution, e.g. in operations that change your actual images (such as writing metadata or moving images around).
The safest thing would be to NOT convert your catalog but rather build a whole separate work area of images and catalog that is disposable, but it is certainly possible to test LR6 in place if you are careful and aware of what operations you take.
Note you can run LR 5.7.1 and LR 6 (aka CC) from Creative Cloud at the same time as well -- you can even go back and install prior versions from the CC app.

The watermark "Preliminary, Draft, not for production use"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for