These forums are painfully slow

This forum has got so slow it's on the verge of becoming useless and is totally frustrating.
It's slow to present the contents of a thread 10-15 seconds, but far, far worse to return from that thread to the thread list 30-45 seconds - presumably rebuilding the whole thread list again? which seems somewhat superflous.
Is it not possible to put some effort into optimization of the code involved in these pages. having a high speed internet connection is pretty pointless if the web site you are accessing is using code that is so poorly written that it presents the results slower than a teletype machine would do in the past.

Yea, in fact their whole web site is horrendously slow. And my browser is stuffed with javascript when I access the site. It's so poorly organized too. The best way I can find the things I am looking for is to 'google' for an answer. then follow the google link. I have yet go get a definitive answer on how they use the 'primary' and 'secondary' email addresses. I set them to see what would happen. Nothing I could determine.... I tried to clear them out (set them back to nothing) but the web site doesn't allow that: Something has to put put in the fields. For now, I just have them set to a totally bogus addresses until I get an answer. Believe me, I'm not holding my breath!
viafax999 wrote:
This forum has got so slow it's on the verge of becoming useless and is totally frustrating.
It's slow to present the contents of a thread 10-15 seconds, but far, far worse to return from that thread to the thread list 30-45 seconds - presumably rebuilding the whole thread list again? which seems somewhat superflous.
Is it not possible to put some effort into optimization of the code involved in these pages. having a high speed internet connection is pretty pointless if the web site you are accessing is using code that is so poorly written that it presents the results slower than a teletype machine would do in the past.

Similar Messages

Open and Save dialogs are painfully slow. Is there a solution?

Open and Save dialogs are painfully slow. Is there a solution?

I pulled this part out of one of the topics Barney-15E linked to. It absolutely works! The glacially slow Finder response has been driving me batty in Mavericks. Each time I restarted, it would take forever to list the startup drive when I opened it. Open and Save dialogues were also painfully slow to respond. Now they all snap open and list instantly. I used TextWrangler to comment out the line in the file auto_master, then ran the automount command in Terminal.
Working workaround:
Use the following statements in Terminal.
sudo vi /etc/auto_master
In this file comment out /net with # (#/net .....)
sudo automount -vc
Fixed.
Confirmed here too both for Preview.app Open file sluggishness and Finder window population. Thanks Snaggletooh_DE!
Couple of notes:
(1) Some folks may be more comfortable using a GUI editor like TextWrangler instead of vi
     a) in the Finder use the GO menu and select Go to Folder
     b) type '/etc' ( without single quotes ) in the Go to folder dialog box and press the Go button
     c) Right ( Control ) click the auto_master file in the resulting Finder window. Select "Open with...." and use TextWrangler ( your choice )
     d) Comment out the line by inserting a '#' ( pound sign ) as noted in Snaggletooth_DE's instructions
     e) Save the file ( probably need to authenticate with your admin password )
     f) Do the 'sudo automount -vc' per Snaggletooth_DE's instructions. Will need to authenticate again.
(2) Notice Snaggletooth_DE described this as a "workaround" because it bypasses an Apple bug. Presumably most people have not changed their auto_master file and it worked fine in Mountain Lion and prior. In other words: If you haven't done so already, please continue to submit feedback and bug reports to Apple for this issue.
Kudos to Snaggletooth_DE for figuring out code is trying to look at network ( NFS ) volumes that maybe don't exist.

These forums are actually painful

I use forums for many of the computer problems I run across. And I have computer problems frequently.
However, Apple>Support>Discussions>... are the worst.
It took over three minutes of watching the download icon spin before this group window opened. Then another forty seconds to get to read one of the previously posted questions, that I thought might help with my question.
And that thread did help. It was regarding outages.
So here is my rant. Apple is a reasonably large, successful company. In my opinion, outages and slow service is counter-intuitive to keeping this company growing.
I have gotten to the point of opening several Support Discussion windows at the same time, switching back and forth between them to try to get an answer to a searched phrase. Even that is not particularly successful.
Apple, you folks really need to examine what you are providing here and how you fund it. I do not seem to have these problems at Windows, Mr. Excel or Mozilla forums.
Just here
k

Ali Brown,
Thank you for your guidance.
I guess I should ask if Apply SysOps reviews these forums? I understand they may not reply, but do they review them. If so, what do they do with the information? If it just goes into the trash bin, no amount of patience on my part will cure the problem.
If Apple SysOps does not provide any guidance that they have seen the problem and given any insight to the remedy what is the point? Apple needs to advise users of their policy position. Even if they do not choose to do something to fix it I'd like to know. That way I may have a choice to make.
It may be better once I know what their position is that I have to stop using Apple products and go to their competitor's. If enough people go to a competitor, Apple will make adjustments. The marketplace is the king.
Apple and Apple SysOps can not just stand on the sidelines and make their customers be patient.
I'm not particularly patient when it comes to things like this. I am porky enough to take my paltry shares of Apple and raise my hand at the next stock holders meeting, and pose the question to Apple management..."why don't they have a viable discussion forum?".
k
HP dv8225nr Media Center Windows XP

These forums are very, very difficult to use.

Hi,
I don't know where to pose these questions. I'm going nuts with these forums, specifically the InDesign forum. I've sent multiple emails to "[email protected]," but, nobody responds.
I have to close down Safari and go back in three or four times before I can get the forum link to work. It's just dead there.
I no longer get email notifications when someone has answered a question I posed. I have to manually go into the forum every half hour or so to see if anyone's responded. The forum used to be much "healthier" in that regard. I was always notified when I got a response from anyone.
I opened a discussion yesterday. But, today, there's no way for me to continue or see that discussion anymore. Only the most current discussions are shown. And, there's no visible way for me to see any "old" ones.
Thanks,
Peter

I use Internet Explorer 11 with Win 8.1 and do not have the problems you describe
Most people complain about Unwanted Email notices
Did you by any chance do as it says here to STOP notices?
Oh... and you do not receive an actual email, you receive a notice in the orange circle to the left of your avatar picture at the top right of the forum screen
Click your avatar picture near the upper right corner (slightly to the left of the pencil) and select PREFERENCES then set all Email Preferences to OFF and click Save at the bottom left
AND
Another new "feature" is that Jive7 is oriented toward social networking... so every time you start or reply to a message you are automatically added to a FOLLOW list... meaning you receive a notification of every subsequent message in that thread

These forums are great!

So first, the Arch guys decide to make an ideal-for-all distro, then they actually keep it current, then they keep it very current, then it's backed up by a set of very active forums?! Too good to be true! All you guys are very, very helpful, and are very polite. Pat yourselves on the back, you're all supporting this great distro and the entirety of Linux in general!

phrakture wrote:
arooaroo wrote:I agree! These forums have been a serious factor in my continued use of Arch. I think there is a great community here.
I hate you! I hate everyone! You all suck! errr.... wait, nevermind... yeah, community! and flowers! and love! and special things! ....
you forgot to mention candy in a heart shaped box.

These Forums are falling apart

Went to post a reply this morning and the forum has logged me in under another users I.D. and told me I didn't have permission to post in these forums. I had to Logout, close the browser, and rebooted the computer just to be safe.
Also is doing that thing where I get stuck in a Login Loop seemingly logged in at the forum root but showing up as logged out when I select a topic.

Also is doing that thing where I get stuck in a Login Loop seemingly logged in at the forum root but showing up as logged out when I select a topic.
Here is a potential work-around for this problem.
Firefox. You need to clear the web cache.
edit > preferences > advanced tab > click on clear now
I believe this was posted by Hiroto.
It's worked for me. I've gotten this down pat.
This discussion took over a minute to load. Stalled out waiting for ssl. I wish someone would test these forums before going live. It's computer science 101.
Robert

Widgets are painfully slow.

I consider the Dashboard/Widgets running on Tiger on my 12" PowerBook to be nothing but a boondoggle. A superfluous bell or whistle added to Tiger to justify a switch to Tiger for all the people not interested in Automator, Spotlight, and...Mail2?. First, they load painfully slowly. Second, they seem to occasionally reset their preferences (weather in San Cupertino?...umm,no) Third they do not provide information that I can't get to more quickly using Safari. Is there a reason why they are running so slowly? Is there a way to juice-up their performance? I have them on my G5 PowerMac as well. They're a bit quicker, but still not quick enough to use them more than seldomly. I feel like I must be missing out on all the hoopla only because it's such a chore waiting for the darn things to load. But then what? My homepage has the temperature, my finder bar has the time, date and Gmail notifier. How can I enjoy Dashboard and what am I missing? I just don't get it and need help. Thanks. A countdown timer to Rent? Ughh!

I have a faster PowerBook 12", but I find them slow to load to. But I think it's the connection to the Internet that holds them up. They all want to access the Internet. But you might upgrade to more memory, if you really want more increased speed. I felt that putting 1 GB extra in my PB really gives that extra "snappiness". Still, the widgets are slow. Also remember, any widget opened takes about 30 MB of your memory (after you have started dashboard once). So don't have any open if you don't use it.
On a sidenote, the most useless Widget is the Google widget... Why would you open Dashboard to access a searchbar, when it will open Safari which has the same searchbar. Why do two steps if you can do it in one?

ITunes downloads are painfully slow, and using the wrong servers

For the past few months, iTunes downloads (from a PC) have been unbearably slow, with single 60-minute TV shows taking 3-6 hours to download. Worse, Apple has decided that I live in the middle east, rather than Vermont. According to Task Manager, itunes is connecting to 204.2.196.136 to download files, and that server is located in Iran.
Before anyone asks, I am using my ISP's DNS provider, located in Vermont. So this has nothing to do with that useless Google DNS service. How do I forge iTunes to use the right providers in the United States?
For what it's worth, no other programs have this problem. Speedtest reports a healthy 10-12 Mb/s, Steam downloads huge files quickly, and Apple TV streaming is fine. As far as I can tell, only iTunes store downloads are affected (from any source, including my iPad 2.)

In my case, I think it's a combination of my isp being incredibly slow (Optus in Melbourne) and iTunes apparently throttling the download speed. A couple of days ago, my download speed measured on speedtest.net was 0.2 Mbps!! After phoning Optus to complain, they reset the line and the speed bounced up to about 6 Mbps. So in that case it was definitely my isp. But now, even with the approx 6 Mbps download speed, my iTunes downloads are taking about 3 hours just to download one 40-something minute episode. When I do a traceroute (start, cmd, tracert itunes.apple.com, enter) the iTunes server is located in Boston, US and I'm in Ballarat, Victoria, Oz.

Premiere Pro CC 2014 renders are painfully slow.

Running CC 2014 on a brand new iMac: 3.5 GHz Intel Core i7, 32 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4096 MB.
I have a 2.5 minute timeline with many dynamic link clips back to simple After Effects CC 2014 comps. Rendering in this timeline is MIND-BOGGLINGLY slow.
Video Rendering and Playback Renderer is set to Mercury Playback Engine GPU Accelerated (CUDA)
And in Preferences > Memory> I have optimized rendering for "Performance".
My Sequence is using Apple Pro Res 422 as my video preview codec with Maximum Bit Depth and Render Quality selected.
Renders should be screaming.
Is anyone else experiencing this? Have I done something stupid in my set up?

Hi Kevin. Thanks for response. Yes, acceleration is enabled. Not CUDA as I'm running on a ATI Radeon HD 5870. See screenshot below.
Also have a thread specific to my issue here: Dramatically slower encode/render times from Premiere Pro CC 2014 via both AME 2014 and direct export via PP
If you get a chance to look through it, I'd appreciate it very much.
Thanks!
Martin

All forums are VERY slow loading 01-05-15

According to Speedtest.net by Ookla - The Global Broadband Speed Test my download speed is 59+ Mbps and upload is 6+
So something is going on with the forum software and/or servers to cause extreme loading slowness

What a difference a few hours makes!
Been away from my computer all day, and now forum speed is back to normal

"These forums are not intended for suppo

LOL! This might be the most effecti've type of support I've ever seen!

It's more intended for discussions, and for people to help eachother where they can. It's not intended for support, because we can't guarantee a reply to every post. For some problems, it isn't suitable to assist people, particularly if the problem is more technical and possibly related to the system, or a faulty player.
As long as you're not being sarcastic , then I'm glad to hear (or read!) you're happy with the forums.
Cat

TS3147 PDFs are painfully slow to print. All other programs print quickly to my HP LaerJet 1320. Any help?

How can I correct a problem with PDF printing? I have an HP LaserJet 1320 and an IMAC running OSX 10.8.2

How can I correct a problem with PDF printing? I have an HP LaserJet 1320 and an IMAC running OSX 10.8.2

These Forums Make IE Navigation go SLOW

I am not talking about going to new forum pages, or to a link in a page
I am talking about navigation within IE itself
When I first start IE (have to use Internet Explorer due to work support policy) I can click the Favorites link at the top and my list of saved links appears INSTANTLY
As soon as I go to any of these Adobe forums, IE slows to a crawl and there is a noticeable lag between click on Favorites and the drop down list showing
Whatever script is running at these Adobe forums is evidently taking up a LOT of computer cycles... enough to make IE's internal navigation run slow
It is really too bad that the webx software could not keep up with the message volume and had to be replaced (per a FAQ note before the change)
I really don't care (much) about the new format... but the scripting to MAKE that new format seems to be using up a lot of computer time

Phos says much the same thing here http://forums.adobe.com/thread/426384?tstart=0
For everything to work, scripting must be active
With scripting active, the forum is SLOW
Since that seems to just be part of what Jive is doing, I don't think these forums are ever going to get any faster

I keep trying to get MS to fix these forums

For the 4th time in a week MS has lost my email. These forums are getting worse and worse to deal with and posting in the forum that is supposed to about these problems is met with a deafening nothingness from MS!
Is there anyone monitoring this forum that can get to someone at MS that cares?
Or does anyone at MS care?
Lloyd Sheen

Hi Lloyd,
Thanks for letting us know your pain when using MSDN forums.
I just reviewed few of your previous post about forum issues. Thanks very much for posting them which are definitely helpful for us to improve the platform.
I do understand your feeling, and I think I will also feel bad if I encounter this kind of issues. However, I would like to let you know that the development team for forum platform is trying to make the site more useful and stable, since I've been engaged
to collect user's feedback.
Customer is always our first priority, so we do care about users on the platform and user experience when we working on this platform. I will send your feedback(including previous ones) to the PM who is driving this directly.
To well manage the WPF forum, I will ask our moderators to move this thread to forum platform support queue. I will keep monitoring on this.
Thanks again for your feedback and cooperation!
<THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED>
Thanks
Alan Yao
MSDN Community Support
Please remember to "Mark as Answer" the responses that resolved your issue. It is a common way to recognize those who have helped you, and makes it easier for other visitors to find the resolution later.

Polite use of these forums

To Apple Community Forum Moderators:
I have owned Apples for almost twenty years and periodically have found myself in need of advice on an Apple hardware issue, network compatibility, or Apple Application issue. The Apple website “recommends” that we go to these Forums for information it seems like a good idea. It has the potential to expand technical help to those of us that have a problem with using a Mac or an Apple application. However, in every case that I have accessed the Forum I have either viewed attacks by some of what I'll call the “loyal users” against others that note problems with Apple, or have been the object of nasty responses myself:
- Early on I engaged the Forum about the difficulty of getting Apples to work in a Windows Network Environment. When I got on I saw nasty comments about similar questions from other users chastising the user for being on a Windows network. Well there is little one can do about that. The institution's leadership decides on what kind of network will be used, not an individual user. To dismiss this problem is unrealistic at best and arrogant at worst.
- After Microsoft moved to Office 2007 and left Mac users in the lurch I purchased iWork based upon what users in the Forum were lauding about about the Suite and what Apple said about it. I found it limited (from what I could gain from being a new user) and sought out answers to questions I had. The equation editor (the industry standard) at the time could not be used in iWork. So I pointed this out on the Forum. I got flamed by this guy that said that this was not appropriate place to point out limitations. I pointed out that Apple Developers would be nuts not to monitor these forums so it would be appropriate to point out functional limitations for future versions of iwork. All I got from the moderator was that I shouldn't have posted it. Others in this thread were flamed because they wanted more functionality from Numbers. They were told that anyone who is serious about analysis would use another database program (Excel maybe? - they didn't identify what program that might be.)
- Just recently I sought out the Forum because I have had this laptop for two years and am having to replace my battery the second year in a row. I tried to get Apple Help on this after my first replacement and did (what I thought was) everything correct. Someone else was having a similar problem. I related my understanding of how to evaluate battery performance (cycle count), and pointed out that Apple has had a problem with defective batteries (most notably mine) and that users need to watch these metrics closely. Well apparently according to one reply post I mis-stated how to evaluate cycle count (though I think I am still correct on that – our IT people basically told me what to look for.) The reply was that I had not really read the manual on batteries. Well I did, though I could have misunderstood what the battery document was trying to say. Instead of accusing me of lying they could have elaborated on why my interpretation was mistaken.
Now in all these cases and more there are social forum communication flaws that Apple needs to be aware of. This flaw is a social pathology that is characteristic of the medium. First attacking a frustrated user is not a constructive exercise. There is a difference between a negative comment about Apple or its applications and negative comments directed toward users. A negative comment at an Apple Inc. product should not be viewed as some kind attack on all users or a violation of a misguided religious doctrine. It should be viewed as a window into a potential improvement. Apple should be “man enough” to take those graciously. This gives Apple a window into problems in either its Help Manuals or its design. Contrary to trying to stifle comments like this Apple should encourage this. (In fact after I complained about the inability of iWork to use Mathtype - Decision Sciences - an upgrade of iWork works with Mathtype.) In a similar manner Politicians in our state regularly lambast the University I work with. I don't have a problem with their attack on the Institution. It goes with the territory. I do have a problem if they focus on a particular faculty member. Apple Inc. can handle criticisms.
On the other hand the “loyal user's” attacks or nasty comments on users that are critical of Apple or frustrated users are another issue. We purchase the hardware or software and expect it to work based upon what we interpret from Apple advertising claims. It is not working the way it is advertised. We may not be accessing the computer correctly, accessing the Help Manuals correctly, using the Apps correctly, or there may be a problem with the product itself. That is why we go on these Forums. To get chastised or insulted by a “loyal user” does not solve our problem and it does not make us want to tell other people how great Macs are. (My experience with iWork pushed me to OpenOffice - which I am writing this letter in rather than Word or iWork.)
More importantly though it makes us very hesitant about engaging in this social forum about a problem we have with an App or hardware. Ultimately this could mean that many technical/business users such as myself will migrate away from Apple because they can't get the solution they need and the mere size of Apples competitors (e.g. Microsoft) means that user support is much more available. We can forego the nastiness by changing products.
Now this is not say that these issues I raise are unique to Apple Community Forums. I was just on an OpenOffice community forum and saw similar behavior so this really is a social pathology that is part of this form of communication. But moderators need to be aware of this pathology if the company wants users to rely on this medium for good advice. Apple hopefully views these forums as ways to see where they could improve products or add functionality to preserve or enhance market share as well as providing broad technical support. But moderators need to more forcefully impose politeness and gracious responses to users that may not sit well with the “loyal user” part of the community. Thanks.

Roger Coupal wrote:
However, in every case that I have accessed the Forum I have either viewed attacks by some of what I'll call the “loyal users” against others that note problems with Apple, or have been the object of nasty responses myself:
"Every" time? I waste a lot of time here and I very rarely see anything that could be construed as "nasty". I read through all of your postings and I can't find any response that could be considered "nasty" or an "attack". In one case you posted some incorrect information and a couple of people called you on it. That's life and it happens to the best of us. No need to get upset about it.
Early on I engaged the Forum about the difficulty of getting Apples to work in a Windows Network Environment. When I got on I saw nasty comments about similar questions from other users chastising the user for being on a Windows network. Well there is little one can do about that. The institution's leadership decides on what kind of network will be used, not an individual user. To dismiss this problem is unrealistic at best and arrogant at worst.
Maybe you should increase your participation. You've only posted 17 times in 3 years. If you were at Level 2 (pretty easy to reach) you would have the ability to automatically alert the moderators about any postings that violate the Apple Terms of Use. Until then, it would be better to notify the moderators via this forum about specific posting that you think are improper. Otherwise, it is just hearsay. Perhaps those postings were from known trolls or people who are otherwise "looking for a fight". People often only start posting here when they have problems and, unfortunately, they sometimes wait until they are already very angry and upset. When they start threads with an argumentative tone, it usually doesn't end well.
I can't really say much about Windows networking. All of MacOS X uses SAMBA, so if you can access it via xterm, you can access via the Finder. Maybe start a new thread with more details and keep trying. Windows networking is very complex and SAMBA is just an open-source reverse-engineering effort.
- After Microsoft moved to Office 2007 and left Mac users in the lurch I purchased iWork based upon what users in the Forum were lauding about about the Suite and what Apple said about it. I found it limited (from what I could gain from being a new user) and sought out answers to questions I had. The equation editor (the industry standard) at the time could not be used in iWork. So I pointed this out on the Forum. I got flamed by this guy that said that this was not appropriate place to point out limitations.
"Flamed"? Again, I read those messages. That was hardly being "flamed". Plus, it had nothing to do with you pointing out limitations.
I pointed out that Apple Developers would be nuts not to monitor these forums so it would be appropriate to point out functional limitations for future versions of iwork.
Sorry, but that is not correct. There is way too much disinformation here for developers at Apple to get meaningful information out of it. If people find bugs or limitations they are usually encouraged to contact Apple via the appropriate feedback channels to improve the products. That actually happened in your case.
No one outside Apple really knows if Apple does or does not read these forums. The official word is that they don't and I accept that. This is a user-to-user tech support forum. It is not a place to complain, report bugs, or suggest enhancements. There are better places for that. This discussion forum is meant to help end-users, not Apple. Apple is a big, multinational corporation with lots of money. They have people whose job it is to track down complains, fix bugs, and enhance products.
All I got from the moderator was that I shouldn't have posted it.
There was no moderator posting in that thread. You can identify Apple employee by the Apple logo under their name.
Others in this thread were flamed because they wanted more functionality from Numbers. They were told that anyone who is serious about analysis would use another database program (Excel maybe? - they didn't identify what program that might be.)
You are the one who mentioned Excel. Someone correctly pointed out that if you are already a user of advanced Excel features you might not be happy with a 1.0 application like Numbers. Excel is 25 years old. No one expects Numbers to match it for functionality. But it might be easier for casual users than Excel. Again, there was no flaming going on.
The reply was that I had not really read the manual on batteries. Well I did, though I could have misunderstood what the battery document was trying to say. Instead of accusing me of lying they could have elaborated on why my interpretation was mistaken.
They didn't accuse you of lying and they did elaborate on why your interpretation was mistaken. You provided misinformation and suggested people take their batteries in to the Apple store for a problem that doesn't exist.
Now in all these cases and more there are social forum communication flaws that Apple needs to be aware of. This flaw is a social pathology that is characteristic of the medium.
I think Apple is well aware of that. That is why they have a good system of moderation that they have been working on for several years. This forum is much better than anything you will find anywhere else. I'm sorry, but you have no idea what a true "flame" really is
First attacking a frustrated user is not a constructive exercise. There is a difference between a negative comment about Apple or its applications and negative comments directed toward users. A negative comment at an Apple Inc. product should not be viewed as some kind attack on all users or a violation of a misguided religious doctrine.
Sometimes people just want to vent. It is pretty clear when someone starts a thread where they don't really want a solution but just want to complain. I always try to give them a solution, while at the same time tearing down all their logical fallacies. Sometimes they are just frustrated and are happy to get the problem resolved. Sometimes they take the bait and keep fighting. Either I've solved someone's problem or I have provided a solution to some jerk who then won't accept it just because it came from me. Either way I'm pleased.
It should be viewed as a window into a potential improvement. Apple should be “man enough” to take those graciously. This gives Apple a window into problems in either its Help Manuals or its design.
Again, you are assuming Apple reads these forums. They don't. These forums are for your benefit, not Apple's.
To get chastised or insulted by a “loyal user” does not solve our problem and it does not make us want to tell other people how great Macs are.
I gave up evangelizing a long time ago. At this point, everyone knows about Macs. If people are too boneheaded to use Macs, I'm content to let them suffer with Windows or Linux.
(My experience with iWork pushed me to OpenOffice - which I am writing this letter in rather than Word or iWork.)
Really? Safari has really nice text editing features with a built-in spell checker. Also, what's wrong with Word? You are obviously a power user, why not use Office? Microsoft got their start with Office, which started out as a Mac program and is still one of the best Mac programs you can buy.
I was just on an OpenOffice community forum and saw similar behavior so this really is a social pathology that is part of this form of communication.
So, in other words, you just invalidated your whole thesis?
But moderators need to more forcefully impose politeness and gracious responses to users that may not sit well with the “loyal user” part of the community.
Moderators really only get involved when there are violations of the terms of use. Being polite is part of that, but graciousness isn't. I think if you continue to post and start answering questions you will soon be able to easily report postings you think are "impolite". Hopefully, when you get to that level, you will be able to better identify a true "flame".

These forums are painfully slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for