Thinking of switching, hitting snags with QNX / BB10 POSIX

Hi all,
I am considering picking up a Blackberry 10 device and make the switch. Two things I want and am researching are (1) the ability to get a local terminal/shell on the phone, and (2) the ability to open local HTML5 files.
On (1), I've found BG Shell / BG SSH but haven't been able to try it for myself yet. Since it's a native application it won't load up in the simulator. However, I can telnet to the simulator and also had another BB10 user on reddit try a command for me which failed. The command was:
for p in $(echo $PATH | tr : ' '); do ls -1 "$p"; done | sort > all_bins.txt
The problem was that the `tr` command was not found, which I found extremely puzzling. QNX claims to be POSIX and as best I can tell BB10 isn't really any more stripped down than QNX already is. So where is `tr`, and, more worrisome, what else is missing?
I also found that, at least when accessing the simulator over telnet, python3.2 complained that it could not find its local platoform independent files (the system site-packages directory containing the stdlib).
I haven't gotten around to (2) yet. Hoping there are no issues editing and viewing local HTML5 / JS files.
Any insight or pointing me to a bug tracker would be appreciated!

Similar Messages

Thinking of switching to the Q10

Dear all,
I am thinking of switching to the Q10 from the iPhone, but there are certain key features that I really depend on and would like to seek your kind advice as to whether BB10 is able to do it.
1. I am using the Gmail app on the iPhone and it has the ability to save the frequently used email addresses that I send to in my browser and autocomplete them when I send it out in the iPhone Gmail app. Will BB10 be able to do this?
2. The ability send as different email addresses as all my work mail gets forwarded to my Gmail account. There are some workarounds that I came across on Crackberry.com and was wondering if anyone knows if the bugs have been worked around i.e. some mails don't come through because a secondary label has been assigned to them in Gmail.
If the above 2 are working soundly, I will most certainly jump on the Q10 as I really miss the keyboard!
Thank you!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi and Welcome to the Community!
fi5hbone wrote:
1. I am using the Gmail app on the iPhone and it has the ability to save the frequently used email addresses that I send to in my browser and autocomplete them when I send it out in the iPhone Gmail app. Will BB10 be able to do this?
Email on BB10 is not browser-based. Rather, the on-device email app uses an algorythm to provide you with suggested recipients to emails you create, which you can select or ignore. The suggestions change over time based on your usage patterns. If you want one of the suggested recipients, a quick click on it populates the "to" field with that recipient. So, while it may operate differently than iPhone, it sounds like it indeed does what you desire.
fi5hbone wrote:
2. The ability send as different email addresses as all my work mail gets forwarded to my Gmail account. There are some workarounds that I came across on Crackberry.com and was wondering if anyone knows if the bugs have been worked around i.e. some mails don't come through because a secondary label has been assigned to them in Gmail.
When you forward, you can choose any "from" account that you have integrated to your BB10 device. If you simply reply, it is restricted to coming from the account into which it arrived on the BB10 device. I don't know if this is the "bug" you mention or not, but this is how it functions.
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

For the first time I think to switch LR

I'm really surprise with myself having the idea to swith to Lightroom.
I've adopted Aperture since the launch, I've immediately loved his workflow. The first 1.0 with many bugs but with the confidence in Apple that new versions will resolve it (and in part it has happened). The rebate of the price, very serious solution. The efforts to give a real usable version changing the development team. I've always supported Aperture, I've also made many show of this software in cooperation with my local re-seller of Apple because I have really thinked that Apple with Aperture will arrive in photo as Final Cut arrived in the video. I speak always the best about it.
But, there is a "but".
After 1 year and half the progress is stop. No idea of when 2.0 will be released, no idea of which kind of new functions will have. In the same time Adobe is really aggressive and competitive, many people I know are switching to Adobe solution because they are more "sure" for the future (and when you "married" with a library concept and software it's a very important thing, specially if we are speaking about raw adjustment settings that will be lost if you change software). Yesterday, during a show made by Adobe I've study very well Lightroom for the first time, I understand the potential and also the possibility to convert my library.
For the first time I really think to switch.
What do you suggest? I know that I'm in Aperture forum so all of us are using that software, but please, help me to understand why it should be better for me stay in Aperture without any idea on the future of this software.
Thank you!
Max
p.s. sorry if my english is not perfect.
G5 Dual 1.8 | 2gb ram | Ati X800 XT 256mb | Cinema Display 23" + Dell 18" Mac OS X (10.4.6) MacBook Pro 15.4 2.0 ghz | 2gb ram

Like many here, I purchased Aperture almost when it came out, and followed all of the updates. I'd used Aperture for over a year when Lightroom 1.0 was released.
When Lightroom 1.0 was first released, I tried a 30 day trial. I shoot landscape photos, and had a Canon RAW file that was particularly difficult to process and extract because of the dynamic range of the image. When I opened that file in Lightroom, the RAW output from Lightroom was noticably better than Aperture. Without any adjustment, it was better than I could accomplish with Aperture under any condition.
In the end, I use Lightroom for one reason: the quality of RAW extracts. (Photography is about the image.) A bonus is that it's noticeably faster than Aperture on my equipment (Dual G5 and a MacBook Pro). I'm not so fond of Lightroom's modal interface. Aperture is much more convenient in that respect. But the image quality is the prime consideration, and Aperture's RAW processing isn't as good as Lightroom's, at least not yet.
I'm keeping Aperture up to date. I've also tried to organize my files and photo library so that switching between the two applications is possible. If Aperture pulls out in front I'll go back.
There are two good reviews of both programs by two different people. One is a Lightroom person that tests Aperture, and the other is an Aperture person that tests Lightroom. They differ on which application they prefer. If you read both, you'll get a sense of the strengths and weaknesses of both.
<http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/2007/03/05/lightroom-vs-aperture.html>
<http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/2007/03/05/aperture-vs-lightoom.html>
Good luck.
Jim

My E72 and why I'm thinking of switching to Androi...

I'm a Nokia apologist. There's no denying it, I've been one of the people on these forums over the last few months who wades in amongst the rants and rages and says 'hey guys, it's not so bad, there'll probably be a firmware update one day' and waves a little Finnish flag in Nokia's honour.
And I have loved my E72. One of the main reasons I got it was so I could be the only guy in meetings at work who DIDN'T whip out an iPhone (*shudder*). Instead I get out my cool classy E Series Nokia, like a man who means BUSINESS. It felt great being the only guy who hadn't spent 700 Euros on an overrated touchscreen toy made by a bunch of control freaks for people who can't HANDLE a real phone. That's right.
I still love it. Sort of. I love that the battery lasts a good four days. FOUR DAYS. I enjoy waving it in the faces of my iPhone-owning colleagues and taunting them with its luxurious battery life. It looks beautiful, so shiny and professional, and feels so RIGHT on the rare occasions when I actually use it as a telephone.
But. There's always a but. And for me it's email.
I don't know what it is about Exchange email programs, but my friends with iPhones say the same thing. I didn't have any problems setting up my email accounts on my E72, but I just couldn't believe it when I found that MfE didn't tell me when new emails arrived in one of my subfolders. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only person in the universe who uses server-side rules to filter emails into folders. HELLO?? ANYBODY OUT THERE WITH ME?? MfE would synchronise my subfolders, but if I wanted to see if anything new had arrived, I had to go in and check every single folder manually. I've asked about this several times on these forums, and can now only conclude that I'm the only person in the universe who uses server-side rules and that I'm insane.
In any case, this wasn't acceptable to me, but luckily I had a license for Roadsync, which I used on my previous N82. Ok, it's kind of **bleep** having to run a separate application, but it does the trick, and LO AND BEHOLD, when I go through my list of subfolders it actually indicates which folders have new mail in them! PRAISE THE LORD!
Or so I thought. Now I discover that any emails I send aren't synchronised with the Exchange server, so there is absolutely no record of them when I'm back at my PC. Once again, I'm probably the only person in the universe who wants to keep a record of all the emails I send. But this is not acceptable - I need to refer to old emails far too often for me to trust sending anything important on my phone now.
And then there's the awful memory management. If I dare to so much as open ONE BROWSER and, yes I know this is audacious, view ONE web page - half the time the phone runs out of memory and borks. ONE BROWSER. This phone has plenty of RAM, there must be something wrong with how it's managed.
And another email thing! My Gmail account works fine in the standard application, except the HTML never loads and I can never retrieve the full messages. I have the Gmail java app installed which I could use instead, but I refuse to resort to that on principle.
So I find myself in the peculiar situation of having bought a dedicated, hardcore MESSAGING phone, which doesn't have a nice big screen, or any other frills and bells and whistles, cause hey, it's a MESSAGING phone. But it turns out, and it has taken me months to realise this, is absolutely awful when it comes to messaging. Subfolders in Exchange!? Is that so much to ask for? And what about being able to multi-task a couple of apps without running out of RAM? Five years ago I had an HP 6515, a truly awful awful awful phone, but the email management on it was absolutely perfect. It did what I expected it to i,e. allowed me to manage my emails just like I do on my laptop. I actually still have it somewhere, maybe I should dig it out!
I hate flashy touchscreen phones. I really do. I hate the way their batteries run dry if you so much as breathe near them. But I'm now seriously thinking of switching to one of those **bleep** new Android phones that HTC is churning out. I have no idea if the email clients are any better on Android, but if nothing else, it would satisfy my insatiable Google fetish.
And at least I still wouldn't be another mindless drone with an iPhone.
In the unlikely event that anyone has made it this far, congratulations and thanks for listening. My therapist told me I had to get all of this off my chest.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I see your point. I have also resisted fat touchscreen phones and waited a lot for the perfect one, the E72, only to find it it is not that perfect.
In a way, it matches all I wanted... native strong encryption, decent hardware, etc. But it has some problems.
The issues with email are a problem in such a business communicator, but to me they are not very relevant (I don't need to synch my work email).
To me that biggest deal breaker so far are the problems with memory. I feel like I have a new gadget and am already getting out of error messages as if it's an outdated brick.
I have an 6220 Classic that boots with twice as much free RAM as the E72. Granted, the OS is a bit simpler but not all that much. I don't know what kind of muppet memory management is going on in the E72 but I boot with about 40 MB free RAM and after loading a few resident apps it is down to 31 MB. Then the more I use the phone the more it leaks until eventually it is down to <20 and either reboots itself or I do it myself.
After some hard resets I concluded that not installing fishy software does help with the leaks, but not much.,,, the thing leaks just by being alive. Every time you see that breathing light exhale it means that a KB has died and went to Symbian heaven.
Running fat apps like Ovi Maps, Sygic Mobile, Skype, Opera Mobile and others is a problem unless nothing else is running.
Are you taking a walk navigating with Maps but want to take a few photos of the scenery? I did that this weekend. Well maybe you'll be able to open the camera app while navigating... hmm "Out of Memory Error"... now, let's try again... There, I closed the Log, no more apps open... Ohh look, it opened the Camera, great... lets take some photos....-click- -click- ok... back to Maps to move on oh no... Ovi Maps closed itself.
Pity, pity... Could be a decent phone but the RAM issue is getting on my nerves. I'm starting to doubt it will ever be fixed by firmware flashing. The low amount of ram and its poor management is to me the single biggest flaw of the E72.
Unlike you, I feel Android is too immature and will only bring many limitations and other problems. Right now I'm out of ideas, except perhaps waiting to see what WiMo 7 is bringing... I do like the 9.3 FP2 but the overall experience is a bit annoying right now.... I'm always waiting to see which app will be closed due to low ram.
PS: I do love the one key torch, and truth be told, most if it all. If it only had memory beyond 2004-standards.

Hard Drive bottle neck.   Running SRT thinking of switch to SSD

I did the "windows experience index" on windows 7 on my new custom build. I got 7.9 (which is the best score) on everything but the primary hard disk. I got a 5.9 score for the primary hard disk.
I set up the drives with Intel's SRT with one 120 Patriot Wildfire Sata 3 drive (only using 60 gigs of it I am using for the SRT seeing that is the max and the other 60 gigs I partitioned it for extra storage space) and a 1 teribyte HDD sata 3 in the two sata 3 ports on my Gigabyte motherboard.   My Media drives are two 1.5 tb in a Raid 0 in the two Sata 2 slots but i don't think the "windows experience index" uses those in their test.
I was thinking of switching this in hopes of a better score and even better performace (even though I am pretty damn happy with the way it works now even with what windows experience index score of 5.9 is telling me)
I have a total of Two 120 Patriot Wildfire Sata 3 drives on hand. I was thinking I should use them in the two Sata 3 ports on my Gigabyte mother board in a Raid 0 which should give me close to 240gig of system drive and a really fast rate of data transfer.
All i am using this computer for is CS5.5 Production Suite and some web sites most all CMS websites these days (maybe a few games but I am not a big pc gamer)
What does everyone think?   If you think it is a good idea for me to switch to the two ssd in Raid 0.   I am wondering if I should reformat all the drives first?   I won't have to change anything on my media drive seeing that is on the Sata 2 part. If anyone has done this before I would love to hear how you went about it.
Oh and off the subject I documented the whole build and posted more than half of the videos on www.brentdolan.com   I am eventually going to come up with another name but can't think of any. any suggestions?
Thanks to everyone in advance.
Brent
www.brentdolanmedia.com

Thanks everyone for your input.   I think for now I will just leave the system the way it is. Why mess up a good thing right?
Just wondering if there was any extra advantage.   My current set up works awesome. It is a dream to edit on but i was wondering if it could be possibly better.
I edit in AVCHD footage.   The footage edits great. Alll real time play back. Exporting to a H.264 is basicly in real time (10 minute clips exports in a little under 10 minutes)
So really what more can i ask for?   I guess I am just being greedy. I should of went with two 2TB drives in a Raid 0 for my media drives but I got the others on sale (at the time was strapped for cash)
Since I built this machine so many more projects followed.
I guess it is like the old saying "build it and they will come"
Thanks again all for helping me make up my mind.
Brent

Branch office setup with L3 switch and router with IOS security

Hello,
I am in the process of putting together a small branch office network and I am in need of some design advise. The network will support about 10-15 workstations/phones, 3-4 printers, and 4-5 servers. In addition we will eventually have up to 25-30 remote users connecting to the servers via remote access VPN, and there will also be 2-3 site-to-site IPSec tunnels to reach other branches.
I have a 2911 (security bundle) router and 3560 IP Base L3 switch to work with. I have attached a basic diagram of my topology. My initial design plan for the network was to setup separate VLANs for workstation, phone, printer, and server traffic. The 3560 would then be setup with SVIs to perform routing between VLANs. The port between the router and switch would be setup as a routed port, and static routes would be applied on the switch and router as necessary. The thought behind this was that I'd be utilizing the switch backplane for VLAN routing instead instead of doing router-on-a-stick.
Since there is no firewall between the switch and router my plan was to setup IOS firewalling on the router. From what I am reading ZBF is my best option for this. What I was hoping for was a way to set custom policies for each VLAN, but it seems that zones are applied per interface. Since the interface between the router and switch is a routed interface, not a trunk/subinterface(s), it doesn't seem like there would be a way for me to use ZBF to control traffic on different VLANs. From what I am gathering I would have to group all of my internal network into one zone, or I would have to scrap L3 switching all together and do router-on-a-stick if I want to be able to set separate policies for each VLAN. Am I correct in my thinking here?
I guess what I am getting at is that I really don't want to do router-on-a-stick if I have a nice switch backplane to do all of the internal routing. At the same time I obviously need some kind of firewalling done on the router, and since different VLANs have different security requirements the firewalling needs to be fairly granular.
If I am indeed correct in the above thinking what would be the best solution for my scenario? That is, how can I setup this network so that I am utilizing the switch to do L3 routing while also leveraging the firewall capabilities of IOS security?
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Austin

Thanks for the input.
1. I agree, since I have only three to four printers, they need not be in a separate VLAN. I simply was compartmentalizing VLANs by function when I initially came up with the design.
2. Here's a little more info on the phone situation. The phones are VoIP. The IP PBX is on premise, but they are currently on a completely separate ISP/network. The goal in the future is to converge the data and voice networks and setup PBR/route maps to route voice traffic out the voice ISP and data traffic out the other ISP. This leads up to #3.
3. The reason a router was purchased over a firewall was that ASA's cannot handle routing and dual ISPs very well. PBR is not supported at all on an ASA, and dual ISPs can only be setup in an active/standby state. Also, an ASA Sec+ does not have near the VPN capabilities that the 2911 security does. The ASA Sec+ would support only 25 concurrent IPSec connections while the 2911 security is capable of doing an upwards of 200 IPSec connections.
Your point about moving the SVI's to a firewall to perform filtering between VLANs makes sense, however, wouldn't this be the same thing as creating subinterfaces on a router? In both cases you are moving routing from the switch backplane to the firewall/routing device, which is what I am trying to avoid.

I have both a MacBook Pro and macair but the pro won't let me in I think it something to do with hard disc or permissions as it says system profiler in utilities , if anyone could help I'd be very grateful

I have both a MacBook Pro and macair but the pro won't let me in I think it something to do with hard disc or permissions as it says system profiler in utilities , if anyone could help I'd be very grateful

Restart the MBP and immediately hold the option key down. Release the key when you see the Apple logo. The computer will boot and show you a screen with two hard drive icons.
Select Recovery and hit Return.
On the new screen, select Disk Utility and hit Return.
In DU do this:
In the list at the left, select the name of your hard drive. (Be sure to select the name that’s indented to the right in the list, not an item at the far left.)
Click First Aid.
If Disk Utility tells you the disk is about to fail, back it up and replace it. You can’t repair it.
Click Repair Disk.
When that is done, click Repair Permissions. Be patient!
When that is done, quit DU and restart in the usual way.

Thinking of switching to BT... but have old main s...

Hi everyone, currently with Sky but thinking of switching to BT. Our phone sockets were installed in the late 1980s.
I have a mains socket coming in downstairs and two extension sockets (both in bedrooms). One of the extensions has the current Sky router connected to it.
If I go with BT I'm assuming the new hub will have to connect to the main socket (ie downstairs). My PC is in one of the bedrooms, there's no option of moving it elsewhere. It's too far away for cabling (plus cats would chew cables and would be a trip hazard). I'm guessing I'd have to connect the PC wirelessly; do BT recommened a card/adaptor for doing this or could I buy my own (if so, which?).
Our current broadband is incredibly slow and quite often drops. The wireless signal isn't that great either downstairs.
I don't want to have to spend out on an engineer and setup costs if this just isn't possible. I'm also a radio ham operator and worried about interference from hubs and any of those horrid PLT devices.
Any help/advice would be most appreciated!

Hi
As Keith mentions about BT Infinity, if you do go up that route the infinity engineer will re-arrange what is your main socket although prob not install new ones.
You don't have to use the power line adaptors although they are only supplied with vision/you view.
If you just opt for ADSL BB Bt would only change/alter your setup for a price.
(If I have helped you in any way to say "Thank You" please click on the star next to the message. Thank You)
If I have solved your Issue please click the "Mark as accepted solution" button.

5 year Customer thinking of switching to AT&T

I have been a very loyal customer of Verizon Wireless for 5 years now and have loved the customer service and all the equipment we have purchased over the years until now!
The first week of November 2010, I went in to my normal Verizon Store and upgraded 3 phones (all of which were regular phones upgraded to cellphones.) and also purchased a wireless remote connection card that all my devices including my home computer, could "supposively" work off of. WRONG. We have not been able to work the wireless internet card ever since we got it in NOVEMBER 2010.
Also, our bill is ASTRONOMICALLY HIGH! We have NEVER had a Bill over $350.00 and that is including 4 Cell Phones and a Netbook! I got a bill in January 2011 for $950.00. Then in Febrauary I got a bill for $505.00 making our total bill $1,505.00. WHY????? The first week in December 2010 I signed and NEW plan at my Verizon Store to pay only $99.00 per month for phone service with 700 minutes and NOW i found out that we are still having to pay for 1,400 minute plan.
We were also suppose to receive 3 Rebate cards (2) for $100 (for upgrading to Droid2) and one for $50.00 for the regular cellphone upgrade. We received (2) Cards 1 for $100 and 1 for $50 and the Rebate Center held the other $100 rebate card which we finally received a couple of weeks ago.
I am a very disappointed customer and have spent MANY hard earn money with your company. I hate to even think of switching to another company but this loyal customer NOW can't even get anyone to help her to get the equipment working half the time. We still can not use the wireless internet card yet we are paying $60.00 per month the service.
If we could just have some type of customer assitance with this ASTRONOMICAL bill that we had not anticipated having due to signing a new plan, we would consider remaining Verizon Wireless customers.
Regards,
Sondrea
{edited for privacy}

Since this is not a customer service forum, but a peer to peer forum, you would do better getting a response from Verizon if you either called *611 from your cell or 800-922-0204 from your landline phone. You could also email them from THIS page.
Hope you get it worked out.

Having buyers remorse-thinking I should have stayed with old plan

Went into retail store because my 18 month old IPhone 4S would not connect to wi-fi. Was told it was a known problem and it was not under factory warranty and I had to buy a new phone. If it is a known problem, why did it not warn you when you upgrade IOS? It seems like a plot with Apple to make you buy new equipment.
So now I'm re-thinking that switching to Verizon Edge is not the plan I want. The only advantage I see is that I could get an upgrade after I pay off the phone which costs $649 so at $27 a month I would be eligible in 12 months to get a new phone. So it seems that now the new plan is just like leasing a phone and you never really own it unless you pay the $649. Is a phone really worth that much money?
Really unsettled now. I knew I should not have gone into a retail store, they are sales driven and I never feel like I see the bottom line to compare costs and make a decision. Every time I have gone into a store I feel like I was sold something I really did not want. Lesson learned to really listen to my gut and shop online to make the right decision. Not unhappy that I got a new phone on the spot, but just not sure the plan is what I really want.
Can someone give me the hard #'s to compare? I have 4 lines that share 6GB of data so I'm paying pre-tax $240 ($80 + 40 + 40 + 40 +40). If I'm paying $27 for the new phone + $80 (data) + 40 + 40 +40 + 30 (new edge plan) = $257. Wouldn't I be better to pay a couple hundred dollars now and own the phone and not have to pay the monthy fee? Really what is the benefit if you are not a person that needs to have the most current phone?

bajadreamer wrote:
My last phone did not last 2 years so I'm afraid to be paying $649 for a phone and then end up having to buy another one in a year because the phone broke.
Then perhaps Edge IS for you. Also if you pay the $199 you have to pay the $30 upgrade fee so it's actually $229. If your phone cost $27 a month for 12 months that is $324 but you are getting $10 discount on the line fee so that's $120. So your actual cost for the phone would be $204 AND you get a new phone in a year instead of waiting a year. Sure you have to give the phone back but why would you want it if you're getting a new phone?

Thinking of switching

Yes, you read that right. I am actually thinking of switching to a different distribution. The situation with the Current repo has gotten that bad... Really, we are miles behind every distro other than Debian. Arch is not bleeding-edge any more; it has become trailing-edge. The Testing repo isn't quite stable enough to use, but there's plenty of stuff in it (e.g. Gnome 2.12) that is stable enough to move into Current, but hasn't been moved. Why? Sure, it's compiled with GCC 4, but would that even be a problem?
Come to think of it... Why wasn't everything switched over to GCC 4 before libtool-slay, so that we'd have an up-to-date Current branch during the slaying?
Look, sorry if I come across as trollish, or don't quite know what I'm talking about (probably the case), but I think I have a fair reason to be. Maybe Arch will be a viable distro again in a month or two, but as of right now it's very, very far behind where it ought to be.
(Frugalware is starting to look rather attractive...)

Gullible Jones wrote:Come to think of it... Why wasn't everything switched over to GCC 4 before libtool-slay, so that we'd have an up-to-date Current branch during the slaying?
Good point.
But...do you realize how impatient this makes you look? It's been a month, that's all! Yes, it would be nice to have a tiny bit of news about when it might be all over but as soon as it is over you'll have the one of the most bleeding edge distros around (again). Surely that is worth waiting? But, if you got nothing better to do than reinstall distros all the time then why even bother posting about it, just get distro hopping.
I assume you hope to elicit some news about when it will all be over and the word is "soon". I have also been informed that there are going to be some changes round here soon...
Everyone should have recognised this period for what it is, a necessary evil. I think it could have been handled much better but regardless of that when it is done it is done and I hope some lessons might be learned.
So, don't bother switching. If the end of libtool slay and gcc was announced on Wednesday along with chalk of new dev positions to get things ticking along you'll be pissed if you switch now!
I am considering a new motto:
"When the going gets tough, the not-so-tough piss off to Ubuntu!"
Lightweights!

Switching MIDI instruments with my MIDI keyboard

I was wondering if it's possible to assign a certain key on my MIDI keyboard to cycle up or down a list of instruments like you can do in Mainstage.

I think I found my answer through another question. I was able to set up different MIDI channels for each instrument and switch those channels with my keyboard. I was also able to map different parts of the keyboard to different instruments. VERY USEFUL!! This has been a big problem for me and now I am glad to say that it seems to be solved. Thanks for your suggestions!
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1802098&tstart=0
Message was edited by: Dustin Isom

Thinking of switching to Blackberry

I have been a Treo user but the Storm looks great and I was thinking of switching over but I had some questions about the Blackberry and its software.
I use Office a good bit on my Treo and was wondering if the Blackberry has the Documents to Go app like the Treo. I also have to confess that I am a serious Bejeweled addict and was checking out the game software that could be put on the Blackberry. There didn't seem to be much and I was wondering if anybody had any opinions on the games that are available for the Blackberry.
I was appreciate any feedback that anyone has, especially if there are any previous Treo users that have converted over to a Blackberry.

DocumentsToGo - Check.
Bejeweled - Check.
Proceed with purchase and joining the darkside. The treo will seem like yesterday's mold to you.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Thinking of switching to DVDSP from iDVD

Hi All,
I'm thinking of switching to DVDSP from iDVD but £900 is an awful lot of money for one app. I already use Final Cut Pro 4.5 so the benefit for the upgrade would be almost entirely to switch to DVDSP.
I like the themes in iDVD and generally it works OK but I'd like a little more control over my DVD's and I'm tired of using freeware apps to complete my workflow (like Anamorphicizer and MPEG streamclip). The 16:9 pan and scan issues with iDVD bug me but I just feel that £900 to "work around" Apple's issues is a bit steep. Especially as there's no other option (like an express version or even a standalone package). There's no solution available to existing owners of FCP or FCE.
Anyway I guess my question is, are there any real great enhancements or benefits that I'd get over and above iDVD - I understand that DVDSP is a much more advanced application but in theory I'm only using a fraction of it's power to create home movies?
Any feedback from people who've switched from iDVD to DVDSP (or anyone come to that) would be much appreciated.
Thanks all.
David.
PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25Ghz / 1GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.6) PowerBook 12" 1Ghz / 768MB RAM

Check out
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2215884&#2215884
Most importanly you can get the whole FCP Suite I beleive via upgrade for £139/199 from FCP 4.5 http://www.apple.com/uk/universal/crossgrade/
Each of the elements alone are probably worth the plunge (Motion 2, Soundtrack Pro, DVD SP 4 and FCP 5, the FCP 5 upgrade is nice)

Thinking to switch on a iMac , what's about noise?

Hi to all,
I'ma pc user that thinking to switch on a iMac Intel 17".
I just wondering about the noise (HD but mostly fan) of the iMac intel. Now I'm working on a Intel P4 Ht extreme and the CPU fan is very very noisy!
I mostly do intesinve vork on Photoshop CS so wondering if the fan of iMac 17" will be always on or if there's no problem with noise.
thanks a lot.

Hi to all,
I'ma pc user that thinking to switch on a iMac Intel
17".
Oh my Gawd, you will LOVE the Intel iMac but go for the 20" and get the additional 256 video ram. Well worth it and you get an amazing display/picture.
I just wondering about the noise (HD but mostly fan)
of the iMac intel. Now I'm working on a Intel P4 Ht
extreme and the CPU fan is very very noisy!
Noise? There is no noise. None. Nada. Zilch and I run my iMac 24/7. It is just on all the time, downloading files or making movies. This is my first iMac and I am so happy to have it. A most excellent machine!
I mostly do intesinve vork on Photoshop CS so
wondering if the fan of iMac 17" will be always on
or if there's no problem with noise.
thanks a lot.
You'll have to opt for Photoshop CS for OSX and again, there is no fan noise. The 20" Intel iMac is very quiet. Promise.
Hudson

Thinking of switching, hitting snags with QNX / BB10 POSIX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for