Third party posting Run

Working on ECC 6.00 on Third party posting using the U500 schmea.
When we run the Report RPURMP00 and able to create a Posting Run.  But when i go and see the document in PCP0, the documents either incorrect /no documents.
When i go and see the incrorrect document all the line iteams have the same error.
"Account with the following search key was not found 1001HRK"
"Internal error when defining the account for search key 1001HRK"
Any thoughts on the above highly appriciated.

Hi SAP HR,
That might be the error of symbolic accounts. The symbolic account 1001 that is defined to the Wage type is not mapped to appropriate GL account. Please check you FI integeration. That is Symbolic accounts and GL accounts. I hope that will solve your problem.
Thanks
Raj

Similar Messages

  • Third party posting run error- Garnishments

    I am running third party remittance posting run for garnishments and getting thr following error for few employees.
    For perno/ seqno 4323 237 not in GRDOC.
    Please advice. How to fix this issue.

    See the following threads:
    How to Fetch a data from HR Master Tables?
    configaration for Garnishments
    Regards,
    Howard

  • Error in third party posting due to missing entry in T51R6_FUNDINFO

    Hi,
    We are getting error "No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO for key xxxxx" while doing third party posting on a particular due date.I tried undo evaluation run through program RPURMD00 but getting a error message "partially posted evaluation runs can not be deleted/undone/reversed". Has anyone faced this issue before and has the solution for it?
    Thanks,
    Monika

    Hi Maddy,
    If your issue is not solved, please continue the same old thread instead of creating a new thread. This helps others to follow the discussion and understand the process to resolve the issue.
    You have posted this same thread twice and please remove one before the moderator locks it.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Third-party posting - Document split

    Hi,
    Our current configuration for third-party posting variant is "Document Split based on Company Code".
    We want to do a document split based on vendors.
    I am not sure if "Document Split Based on Account Assignment Object" will work (I tried. There was no change in posting.) Is there anything additional configuration required?
    Additional details.
    When we do a third-party posting for multiple vendors, 2 documents are created - G/L account document and Vendor document.
    The vendor document contains separate lines for each vendor (and clearing accounts). We want to split the document so that one document number is created for each vendor.
    Any inputs on this will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Ratna
    Edited by: R Kulkarni on Apr 6, 2010 5:28 PM

    Vendor subgroup was used as per SAP suggestion to take care of this requirement.
    Thanks!
    Ratna

  • Fpga: Communicat​ing between fpga and third party program running on pc

    I am using a C-Rio to control a planar robotic joystick. The goal is to use the joystick as a force feedback controller for a computer game running on a pc.
    My program as is for now runs a program on the fpga to read the encoder values and run the pwm for the motors. An RT program reads those values and performs the control as well as it calculates the fwd and inverse kinematics of the robot.
    What I would like to do now is to pass the x-y values of the joystick on a third program (computer game) that runs on a PC.Currently  the game runs on LabVIEW but I would the system to be combatible with other programs written in different programming languages. I have been told that the best way of doing this is to setup a server. Is this the only/best way of doing this?
    I would like to know what is the best way to communicate between a program running on a pc and a program running on the fpga for this type of application. What is the best way to pass along information from fpga to third party app running on pc and vice versa?
    I am sorry if this has been asked before but I couldn't  find a relevant thread. Thank you for reading this!
    Ares

    If you need every command to make it, then you should use TCP.  I would recommend taking a look at the STM library that is floating around somewhere on the LabVIEW Tools Network.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

  • Third party posting

    Hi Guys,
    In enterprise we use 3 programs in the thirdpartyposting
    rpcalcu0
    rpurmu00 and
    rpurmp00.
    In the ECC6.0 version there is one program replacing first two. Could someone please give me the program name.
    Thanks,
    Gajanan

    From PY Payroll - Release Notes - SAP ERP Central Component - Release 6.0 (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/44c490d36157c0e10000000a155369/Chap%2025%20PY%20Payroll.pdf)
    As of SAP ECC 6.0, SAP_HR 6.0, the SAP Easy Access Menu contains a new report to evaluate and update the third-party remittance tables for your organization.
    This report is titled Create Third-Party Remittance Evaluation Run and has the technical name RPURME00.
    This report has replaced the combination of the payroll evaluation RPCALCU0 with schema U500 and the 3PR Store Evaluation Run program RPURMU00. This updated report eliminates the need to create Temporary Sequential (TemSe) files within the remittance process.
    To access the new report from the SAP Easy Access Menu, go to the menu path: Human Resources -> Payroll -> Americas -> USA -> Subsequent Activities -> Per Payroll Period (or Period -independent) -> Third Party Remittance -> Evaluate Remittance.
    You can still access the old options for Third-party remittance from the Easy Access menu. They are located directly below the new report in the Easy Access menu.
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • TP Posting Third Party Remittance Documents Status Incorrect

    Hi everyone,
    I have run payroll to an employee and posted the results to FI Posting. Documents are posted in FI Posting. By using Tcode PC00_M99_URME - Evaluation Remittance (New) I am able to do the third party evaluation for this employee. Until this step the system is working fine. But when I am trying to execute using the T code PC00_M99_URMP - Create Posting run the system is generating incorrect documents.
    The message its showing is
    Messages for Document 0000002282Error in document: HRPAY 0000002282 LOG_800 ( Error Message )
    No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE (Error Message)
    Regarding configuration everything is correct in HR, I verified several times.
    Kindly let me know is there some thing to do reg vendors in FI such that vendors information will be updated in FI.
    Does anyone faced the similar issue earlier.
    If anyone has an idea in resolving the above issue please guide me.
    Your advices are very much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    lalitha.

    Thanks for your quick response.
    I verified the configuration, but I haven't noticed any issue.
    The problem I noticed is when we run third party evaluation run the amount of sign should be changed fron negative to positive. but its not changing.
    The processing class 73 has specification 1.
    Kindly let me know if you have any idea why  amount sign is  not reserved.
    Regards,
    Lalitha.

  • How to reverse third party remittance posting

    We found there was some mistake for one ee's payment. But I can not just re-run the payroll and post it again because it says the third party posting has been done already.
    So how can I reverse the third party posting after it has been posted to FI and the checks have been written?
    Thank you.

    Hi Johnson,
    I got stuck at the same point. I have reversed the document now I am not able to reverse the evaluation run. Can you please explain me how to undo the entries in the remittance interface tables?
    Thanks,
    Amar.

  • Third-Party Remittance in ERP

    We are in the process of upgrading from 4.6c to ERP2005.  When running third-party posting we get the following error:
    No entry in table T52EK for key /401 F or Q
    Table T52EK contains the symbolic accounts and what type of account they are.  /401 should not be in this table.
    We use SAP standard schema U500.  I tried deleting the schema in ERP to see if there was a newer version, but there isn't.
    Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?  Does it have anything to do with the new configuration for payroll posting where you split the tax wage types?
    Any help is appreciated.

    Hi Mary,
    Check/Compare the Processing Classes for WT /401 between 4.6C and mysap ERP ECC 5.0.
    Check all the proccessing classes and if there is any difference in the new system 5.0, make it same as 4.^C and try.
    During our upgrade (4.6C to 5.0, Canada payroll) , i had changed proccesiing class 30, 78, 82 and it worked. This was the difference found before i changed :
    Proccessing Class       in Mysap              in sap4.6
    30                          T                          2
    78                          2     
    82                          0
    I made proccessing class value in 5.0 same as 4.6c and it worked.
    Hope it helps
    Jay Gandhi

  • ARCHIV_CREATE_SYNCHRON_META - Moving file to R/3 from third party

    Hi All ,
    We are presently on a upgrade to ECC6.0
    In 46C :
    There is a functionality in 46c where a third party system runs a script with a xml file (this is a attachment to an Invoice in R3 )and does an RFC to SAP Server to FM - ARCHIV_CREATE_SYNCHRON_META with parameters . THis FM reads file and posts the file into content server . If i go to VF03 and check the  Invoice i can see the attachment and when I click on it .. the file is opened in a New window.
    In ECC6
    Now when we run the same funtionality in ECC 6. The FM ARCHIV_CREATE_SYNCHRON_META runs successfully without errors. When i go to VF03 i can see the attachment , when i click on it in get a message page cannot be displayed .
    As we do not have any control as to how is data stored in content server .. i am unable to trace if the issue is in writing of the file to content server or reading of the file .
    There is a tcode - oac0 where the basis has made settings just as in 46C .
    Has anyone faced such a problem   .. is there anything which we are missing ?
    Thanks

    Hi Srestha,
    The solutions mentioned below will help you solve your problem:
    - Check if your Logical System Name is maintained correctly in the System Landscape Directory.
    - Go to Integration Directory - > double click on your business system (for file system) -> services -> Adapter-Specific Identifiers..... Here if there is no logical system, Please do give the Logical System name that is maintained in the SLD. if you are giving the Logical system name, do save and then activate the changes made.
    Regards,
    abhy

  • Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

    How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50?  It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
    thanks,

    After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
    - Aby
    Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

  • New Third Party remittance issue

    I am trying to run the new third party posting program. I keep getting the following message and no warning message.
    Remittance evaluation run log
    Statistics .
    Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
    Status Evaluation run failed! No documents created
    Personnel numbers selected 0
    Personnel numbers evaluated 0
    Personnel numbers rejected 0
    Personnel numbers skipped 0
    Number of errors 0
    No of warnings 0
    HRPAYNA104 Warning:No item found for this selection.
    This is the first time we are running this in our implementation. I have made sure all P3PR switches are flipped. Please help.

    Hi Felipe
    I have the similar situation and I have applied the Note 1538315 and Now I am going to apply the Note 1484798 ( But this note is for Canada ) the similar issue I have is for US payroll .. which Note should I apply for US
    Please advice
    Thanks
    Henry

  • Using JAAS for third-party webapp

    I'm developing a webapp that will be marketed to enterprise customers. Right now, it handles its own authentication by validating the userid/password against its own user table. I'd like to give customers the ability to plug in whatever type of authentication they want, for example, one that authenticates a user against an Active Directory domain.
    It seems like JAAS was expressly designed for this purpose, but as I read up on it, I forsee all sorts of problems that could be caused by it. If I'm missing something, I'm hoping someone here can set me straight.
    According to the docs, when an app creates a LoginContext and provides it with CallbackHandlers, the LoginContext will check the Configuration to see if any LoginModules are configured for the app (based on the name parameter passed into the LoginContext). If it doesn't find one, it will look for a set of LoginModules for "other".
    Here's the behavior I would like: If there is no set of LoginModules configured specifically for my app, I do NOT want the LoginModule(s) for "other" used, since I have no clue what it/they will be. Instead, I would like to my code to be gracefully notified that no LoginModules are configured, so it can default back to its own authentication mechanism. From the looks of the API docs, however, there doesn't seem to be any surefire way to tell why a LoginException has thrown.
    I thought I might be able to check programattically to see if there's a LoginModule configured for my webapp with Configuration.getConfiguration().getAppConfigurationEntry(appName), but, 1) it looks like that will probably throw a SecurityException, and 2) it also looks like it would return the AppConfigurationEntries for "other" in the event there's no entry for my app.
    It's important that my app not require the appserver administrator to explicitly configure a LoginModule for it, since that could turn into a support nightmare; I simply want to give powerusers the ability to do so if they choose to.
    Is it possible to get the behavior I want from JAAS, without a lot of contortions and workarounds? As I said, I may be missing something, but it doesn't seem like I can.

    This is from the javadocs
    public LoginContext(String name)
    throws LoginException
    Initialize the new LoginContext object with a name.
    LoginContext uses the specified name as the index
    into the Configuration to determine which
    LoginModules should be used. If the provided name
    does not match any in the Configuration, then the
    LoginContext uses the default Configuration entry,
    "other". If there is no Configuration entry for
    "other", then a LoginException is thrown.
    Throws:
    LoginException - if the specified name does not
    appear in the Configuration and there is no
    Configuration entry for "other", or if the
    auth.login.defaultCallbackHandler security property
    was set, but the implementation class could not be
    loaded.
    The or condition here could be ignored because you
    wouldnt be using CallbackHandlers or even if you are
    using them, you could ensure that the classes are
    'loadable'.The problem is, that LoginException is going to be called for anything that goes wrong inside a LoginContext. If there is an "other" LoginModule set, but it doesn't recognize my user's name and password, then it will throw a FailedLoginException. How is my code supposed to know that the user's name/password will never be accepted by that LoginModule?
    >
    2.
    An alternative would be to provide your own
    own implementation of the abstract class
    javax.security.auth.login.Configuration overriding
    the default implementation provided by Sun. Remember, this is a third-party webapp running in an appserver with other webapps from different providers. It has to use whatever Configuration is already there.
    This is
    the same technique if you wish to provide the login
    module information in any other location than a text
    file (as is required by the default implementation)
    You could then throw specific custom exceptions
    ons from your implementation code and choose to
    handle it in the manner you desire.Even if I could do that, which I can't, as I explained, I have to keep this SIMPLE for customers who might not be very knowledgeable in the more esoteric aspects of J2EE and Java.

  • Integration of third party application on Weblogic Portal 10.3

    Hi,
    Need help on how can we integrate a third party application running on HTTP with weblogic portal application.
    SCENARIO
    we have a separate linux box running an application using PHP, MySQL & Apache.
    We want to render this on portal using CPP (Content Presenter Portlets) or HTML/JSP portlets.
    One way I can think of is to use IFrame in HTML/JSP portlets & involve the URL of this application.
    Is there anyway to use WSRP?
    I read the documentation on WSRP - It says that even a non-portal application can be integrated but that application should be having portlets running.
    But this 3rd party doesn't have any portlets running.
    Can anyone help on the same?

    Iframe portlets are certainly possible and the simplest approach. You can also look at using Clipper portlets: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15919_01/wlp.1032/e14244/clipper.htm#g1108243
    Brad

  • Secure the file/data transfer between XI and any third-party system

    Hi All,,
    I would like to use to "secure" SSH on OS Level the file/data transfer between XI and any third-party system Run OS Command before processing and OS command After processing. right now my XI server installed on iSeries OS.
    with ISeries we can't call the Unix commands hope we need to go for AS400 (CL) Programming. If we created the AS400 programm how i can call that in XI.
    If any one have idea pls let me know weather it will work or not.
    Thanks in adavance.
    Venkat

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I have red some blogs like /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2007/07/31/sftp-vs-ftps-in-sap-pi to call the Unix Shell script in XI.
    But as i know in iSeries OS we can write the shell script we need to go for AS400 programe. If we go with AS400 how we need to call that programe and it will work or not i am not sure there i need some help please.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

Maybe you are looking for