Third party remittance_Check generation

Hi Guys,
I successfully ran TPR for taxes and deductions remittance. I went into FB03 and FBL1N and i could see the amounts for those vendors.
But when i go to RFFOUS_C I dont see any Process Id for check generation.
is it from F110?
Can anybody please help me to generate the check for vendors?
Mayuresh

While running Third Party Remittance evaluation foll. is the error:
" REMIT 1 P78 P73
Processing: Derivation of HR Creditor Taxes, Entry not found.
Wage Type: /418
Please check V_T5URC"
This is only for 1 employee whose Residence, work tax area and unemployement tax authority are NJ. for this employee /418 is being formed but while remitting it errors out. I dont know whether its master data error or config.(he is the only one with IT 0209 as NJ)
There are many employees with Residence and work tax area maintained as NJ but unemployement tax authority is NY.
Based on what you've given, I'd say it's configuration - tax model and third party remittance.
Should /418 be part of NJ unemployment's tax models?
Do you remit other /4xx wage types? If so, see what's in place for the other ones (following the IMG or you could start by looking at T5URC)?
If the /4xx wage types don't remit, then you'll probably have to create a new tax remittance wage type for /418 - that is if, /418 is to even be created via your tax models.
This should give you a start.

Similar Messages

How to extend a wifi network of third party router with TC 4th generation?

After searching the communities for a while, I did not find a definitive answer on the following question:
- I recently bought a 4th generation Time Capsule 2TB (MD0322/A), that I also want to use as an extension for our existing wifi network.
- This wifi network is maintained by a Sitecom Wireless 300N XR Gigabit Router. Router is set to work over 2.4 GHz (B+G+N) because of several non-N-wifi devices in the network. The channel in use is currently 11.
- This router provides so called WDS functionality, i.e. the ability for other wifi access points to act as a seamless extension of the basic wifi network (using the same SSID).
- The security settings in the router are WPA2 Mixed, with a password in plain ASCII.
- There seems to be no way to set different security levels for WDS-connections versus normal AP (access point) connections. If WDS is enabled, the security settings of the AP-mode are extended to the WDS connection.
I have set the Sitecom router to enable WDS, and added the MAC-address of the TC in the configuration of this router.
When configuring the Time Capsule, with Airport Utility 5.5.3, I can select the option to use TC to extend an existing network, and I can select the network of choice using the WPA personal or WPA/WPA personal security. However, the TC does not succeed in extending the network, and reports this back. If I manually configure the TC and select the network of choice, Airport Utility reports back that the selected network cannot be extended.
I have read several times in other posts that Time Capsule can only connect to third party routers via WDS using WEP-authentication, but these posts were quite old. I was wondering if this is still the case, or that Apple has updated this functionality in newer versions of TC, and thus there could exist a trick to connect to a WDS using WPA.
I really would appreciate suggestions
Bram Bos

gilles13 wrote:
I have a mac and pc (win7) both are connected thru a network with wifi and allready two access pt.
Airport can not be used to extend a WiFi created by a non-Apple box.
You need to turn off the radio in the router (shut down the existing WiFi). Purchase TWO Airport Express units. Connect one to the router with an Ethernet cable. Configure that one as your primary WiFi network and then use the second Express as the extender.
You need to locate the second Express where it receives a decent WiFi signal. Too far away and it has nothing to extend. Too close and it doesn't buy you anything. Before you plug in the second Express, check to see where the primary WiFi disappears completely. My personal WAG is that you want to locate the second Express 2/3 the distance to that point.
If you use Airport Utility to configure the units, it's a snap. In fact, if you configure the primary first and the extender second, AU will default to exactly the settings that you want.
By the way, I refereed to the Express because it's less expensive than the Extreme and you didn't indicate any need for the Extreme features.

Can you connect the Lightning to 30-pin adapter and Lightning to 30-pin Adapter (0.2 m) to iPod nano (7th generation) with third-party accessories?

Can you connect the Lightning to 30-pin adapter and Lightning to 30-pin Adapter (0.2 m) to iPod nano (7th generation) with third-party accessories?

Lightning to 30-pin adapter and Lightning to 30-pin adapter (0.2m) do not work if connected together by other third-party accessories.

Third Party Drop Ship with Auto PO Generation

Hi All -
I am using a third party drop ship process and I would like the PO to be automatically generated by the system.
I have changed the configuration on the TAS item category and checked 'Create PO Automatically'. I went to OVX5 and maintained the Purchasing Org, Plant, Purchasing group, and order type for my Sales Org.
When I create a sales order with a material with a TAS item category. The purchase requisition gets created but the PO does not. Am I missing something in set up?
Please help
Thanks
J

Auto Po will not generates in third party sales, only PR will get generated based on PR we have to create PO in ME21N.
pls search in forum will get many threads on this
Third Party Sales-Automatic PO generation
Re: Automatic PO isnt working from TAB item category
Regards,
Ramesh

Automatic PR generation during third party sales order

When I am create third party Sales order , systems automatically tries to creates the PR . Ok its fine and as expected . But system asks for Account assignment. Where I can give that account assignment during the auto PR at Sales order

Hi,
In Automatic PR generation during 3rd party sales order,the account category determination depends on following configuration:
Step 1:
Sales & Distribution-->Sales->Sales Documents->Sales Document Item->Define Item Categories--
Check this configuration
Step 2:
Sales & Distribution-->Sales->Sales Documents->Sales Document Item->Define Schedule line CategoriesUnder this configuration ,for your scheduline item category ,check following entries ,Order type-NB ,Item Category---5 & Acct.Assingment category (3rd Party).
Step3:
Sales & Distribution-->Sales->Sales Documents->Sales Document Item--->Assign Schedule line Categories
Then Assign the schedule line category to 3rd Party Item category defined .
From this when PR get generated then acct.assingment category get populated automatically .
Thanks,
AMIT

Question about: Auto PO generation for third party sales order

Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right place to leave this question but giving a shot.
In Sales Item category we have a check box called generate auto po. By reading the help i came to know that it generates PO and/or Purchase Requisition automatically on saving the Sales Order. It is also said that we need to make some ALV setting. Can any one lead me how to configure the setting,so that i can be successful in knowing about Third party Orders.
Thanks & Regards
Mukund

Hello Mukund
It is talking about ALE- Application Link Enabling - not ALV. That is if you have distributed applications and use ALE to communicate between them. I don't think you need to do anything else. Just go ahead and test it. And if your MM Purchasing master data is set up correctly, you should be able to see the message about PO creation when the sales order is saved.

Automatic po creation third party order

Hello Gurus,
In case of automatic po creation from third party order we have attach purchase organization and vendor to sales organization. This restrict only one vendor against sales organization.
Is any BADI available which we can use which to change vedor dynamically ?
Best Regards,
Vasant

Dear Vasant,
For automatic PO at the time of GR following are the prerequisites:
1) In Customizing
a) Auto PO generation must be activated in Mov. Type 101 & 161
b) the plant for which GR is entered must be assigned to standard Pur. Org.
c) Default Document type for PO must be specified in GR ( MB 01)
2) Application - Front end side
a) material must be valuated material
b) Purchasing Info record must exist for vendor , material & standard Pur Org.
c) Conditions in Info Records must be valid.
d) Applicable for stock items & not consumable items
e) you cannot enter any movement in GR block stock
f) Material Master & vendor master records must.
If you ensure all above settings then it is possible to have auto PO during GR.
Please try,
Vivek

Credit Check with Third Party Process

Hi Gurz,
I know about third party process but my problem is with credit check of the customers.
If customer has not got enough credit limit to process the order in normal senario credit controller has to manually release the order as system blocks it. In third party process system will give you warning message when saving sales order about customer credit limit but allows you to save sales order. Once saving sales order it authomatically creates Purchase Requisition. From PR purchasing creates P.O. with out knowing about customer credit limit issue. and so on. In other words goods supplied to customer even though credit limit has exceeded. This user don't know untill raising the invoice to the customer which is too late.
Can we stop creating Purchase requisition or block purchase requistion for credit check ? or there are better way of handling the process for credit check?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Try to implement OSS note -738171 - Delivery block does not influence purchase requisition.
Following is the details of the note;
Summary
Symptom
The delivery block in a sales order does not prevent the generattion of the purchase requisition in a third-party or individual purchase order item. Regardless of the Customizing settings in the delivery block, the system confirms the TAB or TAS item and generates the purchase requisition.
More Terms
Order, purchase requisition, PReq, TAB, individual purchase order, individual purchase order item, TAS, third-party, third-party item, SD order, delivery block, VBAK-LIFSK, VBEP-LIFSP
Cause and Prerequisites
Solution
Create a user-specific user requirement (for example, 902: BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN_902 in Include LV07A902) as a copy of standard user requirement 102 and assign it to requirement 'Preq' by using Transaction OVB5.
In the source code of the user-requirement, program a check for the delivery block which, if necessary, triggers an ERROR_EXCEPTION which prevents the generation of the purchase requisition.
You can use the existing check for the credit block as a template.
Regards,

Intercompany invoice not getting created in third party processing

Dear Gurus !
I am facing a problem in creating the intercompany invoice in case of third party order processing.
In our organisation , for any type of sale two billing documents are creared :
1) Commercial Invoice under the co. code for which sales org. is maintained at the sales order bookin level .
2) Intercompany Invoice under the co. code in which plant is maintained which is used at the sales order level as delivering plant.
So, as per the configuration req. for third party processing , i have created Sales order ( with automatic Purchase requistion generated ) , Purchase order creation with reference to the Purchase requisition , goods reciept ( MIGO ) and invoice reciept ( MIRO ) , then billing doc. or commercial invoice ( VF01 ) with the generation of accounting document and finally the intercompany invoice ( VF01 ) .
But i am facing the problem in final stage , that is , intercompany invoice creation .
Error Message : No open billing quantity has been determined .
I have checked the copy control for sales order to intercompany invoice and still not able to resolve it .
Please reply which setting needs to be done for this .
Awaiting your response , that what copy control settings is required .
Thanks .....

Hi Buddi / Mahesh / Kiran ,
It ' s good to see all of your opinion . But my problem has not been resolved .
I am implementing third party processing in my organisation , where the customer is an export customer ( outside India ) . Hence , this is a merchant export .
All the configurations / Customisations have been done for this process .
The process is running fine till commercial invoice , but the problem is in intercompany billing doc. creation.
I am again repeating - Error message : No open billing quantity has been determined.
Explanation of the process :
1) The order has been booked with item category TAS alongwith the item cat. group as BANS for the material used in the order .
2) The sales area is 1020 / 30 / 35 . Here , 1020 is sales org . under company code 0079 , 30 is export's distribution channel and 35 is the division for components .
3) The delivering plant used in the sales order is 1009 which is under co. code 0077. The price / condition record maintained for this material is in USD / EUR as it is a case of merchant export .
4) The purchase requisition is generated automatically when the order is saved . It can be seen at VA02 - > Item details - > Schedule Lines .
5) With the help of this PR no. , i have created a purchase order for vendor which is maintained under co. code 0077 asking for material in plant 1009 which we need to export / supply to the customer.
6) The value of material per piece in the P.O. is coming from the material master record -> Accounting 1 view - > Moving av. Price .
7) Now, the Purchase order is saved . With the help of this P.O. no. , goods reciept ( MIGO )is done .
8) After MIGO , Invoice reciept or MIRO is done under company code 0077.
9) After MIRO , customer ' s invoice is created through VF01 .
Remember : This is an order relevant billing , no delivery or PGI will happen here because the material is not coming into the plant 1009 .
10)The billing document ( order - related billing doc.) is created and the accounting document is also created under co. code 0079 in USD .
Till this stage , everything is running successfully as per business requirement , but i am facing the problem in the final stage , that is creation of intercompany invoice under co. code 0077 which is in INR .
In all other sales document types used in our industry , the process is same , that is : a) Sales order creation b) Delivery and PGI c) Billing doc. creation with accounting doc. under co. code 0079 and finally d) Intercompany invoice with accounting doc. under co. code 0077 and excise invoice creation with reference to intercompany invoice.
In the above, problem is not there becuase orde is delivery relevant , hence copy control is maintained for interco. billing to delivery type.
But in the new process , that is , third party processing , sales order relevant billing is done . so i suppose there will be a copy control for intercompany billing and sales doc. type , but i am not able to resolve it .
Hence , please understand the process before suggesting .
Thanks and awaits reply........

SSO to third party in EP 7.0 (SP-21)

Folks,
Could you please advise if we can do SSO to third party vendor using SAML/SAP logon Ticket in EP 7.0 (SP-21).
Let me explain a bit: We have EP 7.0 (SP-21), after initial logon to portal we can access backend SAP ECC6/BI applications (WebDynpro/ITS..). We would like to bring few third party vendor applications into Portal (content area) as single sign on using SAML/SAP logon Ticket
I had a chance to look into this presentation:
2009 SIM201 Next Generation SSO for SAP Applications with SAML 2.0
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/shop?rid=/media/uuid/106df189-4d83-2c10-82a4-c0643a8bf57b
It talks about EP 7.2. Can you advsie if we can do SSO to third party vendor using SAML/SAP logon Ticket in EP 7.0 (SP-21).
Thanks in advance.
Moin.

Hi Oliver,
You have the following options:
1. The user exists in NW 7.3 but has different user id than the one in the SAML2 assertion provided by the 3rd party system
For this check the following documentation link: [documentation about out-of-band account linking|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/a9/e287475d544cdaa63e884180d6c23f/frameset.htm]
- if the email is available on both systems - the one that issues the assertion and NW 7.3 then try to use Email NameID format
- you may also maintain user mapping in NW 7.3 in additional user attribute
2. Same as #1 but you want that the user links both accounts when first logged in with SAML2
For this check the following documentation link: [documentation about interactive account linking|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/97/4e80f86ccb43419a545c672a6bb2e3/frameset.htm]
3. The user has not account on NW 7.3 and such has to be created on the fly based on the information (assertion attributes) in the assertion (automatic account creation)
For this check the following documentation link: [documentation about automatic account creation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/97/4e80f86ccb43419a545c672a6bb2e3/frameset.htm]
4. Use temporary in-memory users
For this check the following documentation link: [documentation about identity federation with transient users|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/fd/ecb2b33922414e8ad01763c84b3349/frameset.htm]
Could you provide more details about your scenario and which option seems to be relevant to it? Once we can identify which one is relevant we can discuss further details.
Regards,
Dimitar

How can I use Drupal as a third party CMS with ATG E-Commerce Application?

Hi Friends,
We are planning to use a third party Freeware Content Management System (CMS) for web site content in ATG E-Commerce Application, instead of ATG content Administration or merchandising.
Can anybody please let me know how can I use a third party CMS(Eg: Drupal) with ATG E-Commerce Application?
Regards,
Krishna.

I did create a rule to determine if anyone coming through time eval is a new hire based on vacation elig. date in IT0041. It compares Today to the vacation elig. date and if they match, set a time type indicator to 1. I also added another decision to determine if they were a part time employee and pro-rate their quota entitlement based on what's in their IT0007 weekly working hours. Instead of setting the time type indicator to 1, I recalculated based on a percentage of 40 hrs/wk and then updated the time type to that percentage. In my quota generation rule I use that time type as a multiplication factor to recalculate their new pro-rated amount rounded up to the nearest whole number.

HOw to consume/configure a third party web service from webDynpro

Hi
I have create a Adaptive webservice model .
1. selected the UDDI or URL option after decalring the model name and package.
2. Default metadata destination = ImgGen
3. Definig execution destination = Exec.
4. Entered the WSDL url AND GENERATED THE WEB SERVICES SUCCESSFULLY.( HTTP://(SERVERNAme):port/WSName/some.asmx?WSDL )
I HAVE DEFINED dYNAMIC PROXY USING vISUAL ADMIN.
Visual admin >> Web services security >> Runtime >> security configuration >> Webservice clients >> sap.com >> DynamicWSProxies >>
Gave destination Name same as default metadata and created one more for execution( step 2 aND 3) AND url =(HTTP://(SERVERNAme):port/WSName/some.asmx)
restarted thre server.
When I try to consume the webservices
I am getting the following error.
java.io.IOException: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.util.NestedException: Parser exception occurred:Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19)(:main:, row=61, col=19) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19)
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.exception.WSModelRuntimeException: Exception on creation of service metadata for WS metadata destination 'ImgGen' and WS interface 'WSImgGenerationSoap'. One possible reason is that the metadata destination 'ImgGen' has not been properly configured; check configuration.
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.getOrCreateWsrService(WSModelInfo.java:440)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.readOperationsFromWSDL(WSModelInfo.java:372)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.importMetadataInternal(WSModelInfo.java:342)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.importMetadata(WSModelInfo.java:326)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo$Cache.getModelInfo(WSModelInfo.java:199)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.getModelInfoFromCacheOrCreate(WSModelInfo.java:1035)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.getModelInfoFromCacheOrCreate(WSModelInfo.java:248)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.gci.WSTypedModel.<init>(WSTypedModel.java:41)
     at com.pk.ws.model.ImgGen.<init>(ImgGen.java:59)
     at com.pk.ws.WdImgGenWS.genImage(WdImgGenWS.java:208)
     at com.pk.ws.wdp.InternalWdImgGenWS.genImage(InternalWdImgGenWS.java:288)
     at com.pk.ws.WdImgGenWSView.onActionGenImage(WdImgGenWSView.java:143)
     at com.pk.ws.wdp.InternalWdImgGenWSView.wdInvokeEventHandler(InternalWdImgGenWSView.java:156)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingView.invokeEventHandler(DelegatingView.java:87)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Action.fire(Action.java:67)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.doHandleActionEvent(WindowPhaseModel.java:420)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.processRequest(WindowPhaseModel.java:132)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WebDynproWindow.processRequest(WebDynproWindow.java:335)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.AbstractClient.executeTasks(AbstractClient.java:143)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:321)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessingStandalone(ClientSession.java:713)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessing(ClientSession.java:666)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doProcessing(ClientSession.java:250)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:149)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:62)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doPost(DispatcherServlet.java:53)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:102)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:172)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.util.NestedException: Parser exception occurred:Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19)(:main:, row=61, col=19) -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException: Document is not well-formed: Start-tag 'p' is different from end-tag 'ul'(:main:, row:61, col:19)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.query.WSDLReader.checkForException(WSDLReader.java:100)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.query.WSQueryImpl.initialize(WSQueryImpl.java:312)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.query.WSQueryImpl.findWSInterfaces(WSQueryImpl.java:151)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.server.management.discovery.ServiceDiscoveryImpl.getWSDLUrl(ServiceDiscoveryImpl.java:71)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.client.dynamic.GenericServiceFactory.createService(GenericServiceFactory.java:128)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.metadata.WSModelInfo.getOrCreateWsrService(WSModelInfo.java:429)
     ... 41 more
Any hint or solution is highly appreciated.
thanks
pk
Edited by: Prashanth Kiran on Jul 22, 2009 10:11 PM
Edited by: Prashanth Kiran on Jul 22, 2009 10:14 PM

Thanks Siva,
My version
Version: 7.0.09
Build id: 200608262203
I need to push my webdynpro application into QA system. so third party webservices also move to it's own QA system.
Now Once I need to move my code to QA the webservice should point to third party webservice's QA system.
This is the reason I am defining them in the Visual admin.
This works fine when I use without using default destiation metadata and execution .
Since I need to move them to QA and at the same time webservice host is also moving to its QA server, I need to change the reference so that my webdynro model points to the QA server where the webservice is pointing.
Please note WebAS QA server where my webdynpro for java program is depoloyed and the WEbservice is hosted in a different server and is a non SAP webservice.
regards
PK

QM in Third Party Orders

Gurus
In one of my scenario I want to deactivate Inspection Lot generation for Third Party Procurements
If I procure Material M1 with Inspection Type - 01 from Vendor V1 through normal procurement inspection lot should be created (Which is working fine) but if I prcoure same material from the same vendor but this time and its directly been dispatched to the Customer then in this flow
I need to create GR (Statistical GR - To ensure Material is received by Customer and accounting entries)
This time Inspection lots are getting generated.
How can I restrict this ?
Thanks
KK

Hi KK,
What I have understood is, you donu2019t want inspection lot to generation if the consignment is directly going to customer.
Inspection activity is based on the movement type. By which movement type this material is dispatched to your customer? Deactivate inspection for that movement type. Follow this path for the same. QCC0 -> Quality inspection > inspection lot generation > Inspection for goods movement > Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type >Select the movement and tick on QM Not active checkbox.
If you are using the same movement type in both the cases, I would suggest to customize the different movement type and deactivate QM for that movement.
This will ensure no generation of inspection lot.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Closed Third party Sales order still showing on Customer credit exposure

Hi,
We had earlier closed the status for a partially Invoiced Third party Sales order ,where Goods Receipt quantity was more than the PO and Customer Sales order quantity from Being Processed to completed through a Z transaction.
The payments for all the quantities delivered to the customers have been received for this particular third party order,but the value of one of the sales order item is showing as an exposure in the customer credit account.
Since there is no outstanding amount for this Sales order,How can this be resolved so as to this Sales order item amount should not appear in Customer credit account?
Inputs regarding this would be appreciated.
Regards
Mohammed Roshan

Hi Jurijs,
Have you checked LVKMPFZ1, LVKMPFZ2 & LVKMPFZ3 to find out if there is any code for credit checks and blocks in these user exits. Also please check FORM USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT under include MV45AFZF to find out if there is any code which is entered to not allow the availability check for blocked sales orders and therefore stopping the transfer of requirements inthe form of PR generation.
Don't worry about going into ECC 6.0. Once you will start the upgrade process on ECC 6.0, you will come to know a set of transaction codes which you can run into the system to find out the non standard ABAP code changes which exists in your SAP landscape.

How can I have SAP to identify third party new hires as a new employee?

Hello,
Situation:
Our company has changed our vacation quota policy for new hires. In 2011, new hires did not receive any vacation their first year. In 2012, that policy has changed to give them vacation based on how many months are left in the year. Example:
If hired Jan 1 - June 30 = 80 hrs, July 1 - Oct 31 = 40 hrs, Nov = 24 hrs, Dec = 0 hrs. I have configured the Rules for Generating Absence Quotas to make this happen, however we've discovered a slight problem.
If a new hire has never been in our system, the logic works perfectly, however, in the case of third party employees, they are already in the system, thus have a Actions infotype with their third party onboarding hire date. At this point they are defined as employee group = 3. After 90 days, we hire them as a production employee, employee group = P, so now they are now a company employee. When they process through the generation rules, the system does not recognize they are a new hire employee because it uses their Actions entry date based on their third party onboarding entry.
Question:
When determining seniority, I'd like the system to use their third pary new hire action and not the third party onboarding action. Does anyone have a solution or suggestion?

I did create a rule to determine if anyone coming through time eval is a new hire based on vacation elig. date in IT0041. It compares Today to the vacation elig. date and if they match, set a time type indicator to 1. I also added another decision to determine if they were a part time employee and pro-rate their quota entitlement based on what's in their IT0007 weekly working hours. Instead of setting the time type indicator to 1, I recalculated based on a percentage of 40 hrs/wk and then updated the time type to that percentage. In my quota generation rule I use that time type as a multiplication factor to recalculate their new pro-rated amount rounded up to the nearest whole number.

Third party remittance_Check generation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for