Third party remittance configuration

Hi,
Can anybody share the configuration steps for third party in Payroll.
Regards,
KV

Hello KV,
You can find some reference on:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/64/30dc98089b11d3807b00c04fadcafa/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/2d/ac1f48032f11d3807600c04fadcafa/frameset.htm
Are you using the new report RPCIPE00? If so, please consider the
following information:
From SAP note 919139:
If you are using the new report (RPCIPE00), you must process the U.S.
tax wage types and "other wage types" differently:
   o  For U.S. tax wage types, select US tax posting wage types.
   o  For other wage types, select Posting a wage type.
If you are using the old report (RPCIPE00_OLD), you must process all wage types using Posting a wage type. You should not use US tax posting wage types.
Also, if you use RPCIPE00 the processing class 78, should be set up with the value "2". Which is defined as "Posting US Tax" in T7US3PR_TXSYMKO. You could do this setting in view V_512W_O."
You can access the new IMG step at: Payroll USA -> Posting to Financial Accounting -> Activities in the HR-System -> Wage Type Maintenance -> posting attributes (without U.S. Taxes).
Hopefully this helps.
Kind regards,
Graziela Dondoni

Similar Messages

  • Third Party Remittance config for Canada

    I have a requirement as follows:
    Third Party Remittance programs are to be available for use by Canada.
    When executing program PC00_M07_K500 we get the below error message
    Entry notfound for wage type: /102
    Business number : XXXXXXXXX and prov. of employment:
    Please check table T5KRC.
    Can someone help me out with the steps to configure TPR for CAnada? I've searched everywhere but cannot find a config guide?

    I got the answer. I tested with changing the processing class it's working fine without any issues.

  • Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance

    Dear all,
    Could anyone please explain me about this concept : "Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance"?
    What this actually means and what we do in it?
    Thank you all in advance.
    Regards,
    Mamta

    hi mamta,
    this mainly decides how you pay the third parties through payroll.
    here you have to create HR payees for the third party vendors.
    then you setup the assignment of the WT to the HR payees.
    then you take the information of the G/L accounts and also others details like which G/L account is for which third party vendor from the FI people. then depending on that information you then setup the assignment of the HR payees to their respective G/L accounts.
    here you also have to decide when these payments has to be made to these third party providers.
    you enter the HR payees numbers in table T51RH.
    this is just an overview of configuration of Third party Remittance.
    reward points if it is helpful
    regards,
    salman

  • Third Party Remittance Process

    Hi All,
    Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US.  Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York.  SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
    To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK.  So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
    Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
    But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
    1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
    2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
    So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    transaction:  PC00_M10_U500
    This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0).  It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D.  Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
    The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

  • Third party remittance Error

    Hi
    While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
    I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000"   There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table.  but I am getting the message
    THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
    This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
    Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

    It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78.  Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

  • Third party remittance issue - no documents created

    hi All,
    When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
    Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
    Status                                   Evaluated ! No documents created
    Personnel number selected: 1
    Personnel number evaluated 1
    personnel number rejected 0
    personnel number skipped 0
    Number of errors 0
    No of warnings  0
    Can an one please help me on this issue.  
    Thanks,
    Sai

    hi Michael,
    The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
    Can you please help on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sai

  • Third party sales configuration

    Dear
    I needed your guidance for third party sales when vendor supply the material to the customer we keep item category group BANS and stock entered virtually in our stock and then vendor invoice generated and received by the company through MIGO and MIRO.
    My question is that when vendor supply to the company and company supply to the client or other wise I can say our item category is HAWA in that case what will be process can you elaborate the process and configuration of the scenario.
    Thanks
    Riti

    Hi Riti,
    Just adding to Kapil's input,
    hope below input will helpyou
    An Example Of Third Party Sales
    Scenario:
    2 companies are created in system - India & Singapore Customer places sales order for particular material on Singapore.  Singapore is not able to produce the same. They pass on the order to India for processing.  After processing India ships the material directly to the customer along with necessary documentation.  Invoice copy is passed on to Singapore.  Final Commercial Invoice will be raised by Singapore.  How can the above scenario handled? 
    By: Balaji
    You can do this using third party sales.
    The third party sales process is as under.
    1) Singapore company creates an order for the singapore customer.
    2) Because of the configuration settings of the sales document type, item category & schedule line category, as soon as the order is saved a PR (purchase requisition) is automatically generated. This is converted into PO (purchase order) and sent to the Indian company.
    3) Indian company supplies the material directly to the Singapore customer.
    4) Indian company sends the invoice to the Singapore Company.
    5) Singapore company does the invoice verification in MM using tcode MIRO.
    6) Singapore company raises the invoice to the singapore customer.
    In standard SAP, item category TAS is used for this. The schedule line category is CS. Here you can see a field 'order type' with value 'NB'. This triggers the automatic creation of the PR.
    Plus in the material master also you need to do certain settings.
    1) If you are always following a third party process for a material then you have to create the material using item category group BANS. The procurement type should be marked as external procurement (F) in MRP 2 view of the material master record.
    2) If you are not always allowing third party order processing then you can create a material master record with item category group as NORM and the procurement type should be marked as (X) meaning both types of procurement (in house manufacturing and external procurement).
    In the item category the billing relevance should be 'F'.
    Third party order processing is as follows:
    Assume three companies X, Y and Z
    X - The company,
    y - The customer
    Z - Vendor
    When ever X gets a PO from Y to supply some goods, X has an option of either manufacturing those goods or procuring those goods.
    If he is procuring the goods, there are two methods that are generally followed:
    Method 1)
    After receiving the PO from Y, X creates a sales order against Y.
    Now at the same time he also creates a PO to a vendor Z to produce the goods
    Z produces the goods and supplies to X
    X receives the goods from Z
    Then X delivers the same goods to Y.
    After that X invoices Y and Z invoices X.
    Note : Here there is no direct/ Indirect relation between Z and Y.
    This process is known as Trading Process. and the Material here is created with Material type HAWA.
    The other method is a Third party order processing method:
    Here the glaring difference is that instead of Z supplying the material to X and X in turn supplying the same material to Y.
    X authorizes Z to supply the material to Y on his behalf and notify him once the delivery is complete.
    Now Z supplies the material to Y and acknowledges the same to X.
    Z will send a copy of delivery acknowledgement and invoice to X.
    After receiving the delivery confirmation and invoice from Z, X has to verify the invoice and this process is known as invoice verification and is done in SAP through Tcode MIRO.
    The next step for X is to create an invoice and submit to Y
    Only after the invoice verification document is posted then only X can create an invoice for Y.
    This is the business flow that is followed for third party order configuration.
    There are few steps that have to be configured to enable the system to function as mentioned above.
    Step1)
    If you are always followwing a third party process for a material then you have to create the material using item category group BANS.
    The procument type should be marked as External procurement (F) in MRP 2 view of the material master record.
    if you are not always allowing third party order processing then u can create a material master record with item category group as NORM and the procurement type should be marked as ( X) meaning both types of procurment ( in house manufacturing and external procurement).
    step 2)
    the item category in the order should be manually changed as TAS.
    For that you need to confugure the item category determination
    ord type + item cat grp + usge + Hiv level = Item cat + Manual item cat
    OR + NORM + + = TAN . + TAS
    OR + BANS + + = TAS
    Step 3)
    make sure that during the item category configuration for TAS you need to mark relevnat for billing indicator as F
    step 4)
    The schedule line cateogry for this type should be CS.
    make sure that you mark subsequent type as NB - purchase requisition in this schedule line category as this will trigger the purchase requision order immediately after the creation of the sales order and the PO to vendor is created against this purchase requiesion.
    Regads Siva

  • Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

    Hi Guys,
    While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run.  But the Information that is displayed in the output is only  for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
    If the other applicable Business Area  ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
    Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
    Thanks in advance
    Jay Gandhi

    Hi Guys,
    This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
    Have also notified SAP OSS .
    Jay Gandhi

  • Third party remittance simulation document

    Hi Guys,
    When i open third party remittance simulation posting document in PCP0 and when double click on vendor to see the details of payments it shows me following error.
    "An explanation of some or all document lines is not possible".
    Here is the detail explanation:
    iagnosis
       The system cannot explain one or all document lines of this selection.
    rocedure
       This problem can be caused by either:
       o   A document line item being incomplete. For more information, see the
           error explanation.
       o   The posting run having been created before the remittance
           functionality supported "detailed info on TP runs". In this case,
           the system will not be able to show the selection correctly. As a
           result, the displayed items may not add up to the total sum of the
           selected items.
    We have selected the data on employee level on the config level.
    On PRD posting, we can see the detailed item.
    What could be the reason?
    Mayuresh

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Third party Order Configuration

    Hi Gurus,
                 In third Party Order Configuration i want to Configure in such a way that PR00 pricing condition type which I have maintained in my pricing Procedure must trigger the price maintained by the vendor in the incoming invoice?
    How to do the above configuration?
    Regards,
    Sarosh

    Hi,
    In such a scenario, you have only one option of maintaining your PR00 = PB00.
    PB00 is vendor's price maintained in the purchasing document.
    with this you can have a control over this.
    Else i dont think there is a configuration option avaialable if your vendor price is variying every now and then.
    Always ensure PR00 = PB00
    Hope this will help you out !
    Regards,
    Syed Nasir

  • Third Party Remittance Document Numbers

    Hi All,
    Client would like separate document numbers per vendor in the third party remittance posting. Currently one document number has several vendors. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
    Thanks,
    Marlo

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

    How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50?  It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
    thanks,

    After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
    - Aby
    Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

  • Facing a problem to run the garnishment  for third party remittances

    Hi All,
    When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00  for garnishment  for third party remittances. We got an error messages as   PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
    Thanks,
    -suresh

    Did you carry out the following two activities?
    1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
    2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

  • TP Posting Third Party Remittance Documents Status Incorrect

    Hi everyone,
    I have run payroll to an employee and posted the results to FI Posting. Documents are posted in FI Posting. By using Tcode PC00_M99_URME - Evaluation Remittance (New) I am able to do the third party evaluation for this employee. Until this step the system is working fine. But when I am trying to execute using the T code PC00_M99_URMP - Create Posting run the system is generating incorrect documents.
    The message its showing is
    Messages for Document 0000002282Error in document: HRPAY 0000002282 LOG_800 ( Error Message )
    No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE (Error Message)
    Regarding configuration everything is correct in HR, I verified several times.
    Kindly let me know is there some thing to do reg vendors in FI such that vendors information will be updated in FI.
    Does anyone faced the similar issue earlier.
    If anyone has an idea in resolving the above issue please guide me.
    Your advices are very much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    lalitha.

    Thanks for your quick response.
    I verified the configuration, but I haven't noticed any issue.
    The problem I noticed is when we run third party evaluation run the amount of sign should be changed fron negative to positive. but its not changing.
    The processing class 73 has specification 1.
    Kindly let me know if you have any idea why  amount sign is  not reserved.
    Regards,
    Lalitha.

  • Third-Party Remittance in ERP

    We are in the process of upgrading from 4.6c to ERP2005.  When running third-party posting we get the following error:
    No entry in table T52EK for key /401 F or Q
    Table T52EK contains the symbolic accounts and what type of account they are.  /401 should not be in this table.
    We use SAP standard schema U500.  I tried deleting the schema in ERP to see if there was a newer version, but there isn't.
    Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?  Does it have anything to do with the new configuration for payroll posting where you split the tax wage types?
    Any help is appreciated.

    Hi Mary,
    Check/Compare the Processing Classes for WT /401 between 4.6C and mysap ERP ECC 5.0.
    Check all the proccessing classes and if there is any difference in the new system 5.0, make it same as 4.^C and try.
    During our upgrade (4.6C to 5.0, Canada payroll) , i had changed proccesiing class 30, 78, 82 and it worked. This was the difference found before i changed :
    Proccessing Class       in Mysap              in sap4.6
    30                          T                          2
    78                          2     
    82                          0
    I made proccessing class value in 5.0 same as 4.6c and it worked.
    Hope it helps
    Jay Gandhi

Maybe you are looking for