Third party remittance issue - no documents created

hi All,
When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
Status                                   Evaluated ! No documents created
Personnel number selected: 1
Personnel number evaluated 1
personnel number rejected 0
personnel number skipped 0
Number of errors 0
No of warnings  0
Can an one please help me on this issue.  
Thanks,
Sai

hi Michael,
The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
Can you please help on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

Similar Messages

  • New Third Party remittance issue

    I am trying to run the new third party posting program. I keep getting the following message and no warning message.
    Remittance evaluation run log
    Statistics .
    Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
    Status Evaluation run failed! No documents created
    Personnel numbers selected 0
    Personnel numbers evaluated 0
    Personnel numbers rejected 0
    Personnel numbers skipped 0
    Number of errors 0
    No of warnings 0
    HRPAYNA104 Warning:No item found for this selection.
    This is the first time we are running this in our implementation. I have made sure all P3PR switches are flipped. Please help.

    Hi Felipe
    I have the similar situation and I have applied the Note 1538315 and Now I am going to apply the Note 1484798 ( But this note is for Canada ) the similar issue I have is for US payroll .. which Note should I apply for US
    Please advice
    Thanks
    Henry

  • Third party remittance simulation document

    Hi Guys,
    When i open third party remittance simulation posting document in PCP0 and when double click on vendor to see the details of payments it shows me following error.
    "An explanation of some or all document lines is not possible".
    Here is the detail explanation:
    iagnosis
       The system cannot explain one or all document lines of this selection.
    rocedure
       This problem can be caused by either:
       o   A document line item being incomplete. For more information, see the
           error explanation.
       o   The posting run having been created before the remittance
           functionality supported "detailed info on TP runs". In this case,
           the system will not be able to show the selection correctly. As a
           result, the displayed items may not add up to the total sum of the
           selected items.
    We have selected the data on employee level on the config level.
    On PRD posting, we can see the detailed item.
    What could be the reason?
    Mayuresh

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Third Party Remittance Document Numbers

    Hi All,
    Client would like separate document numbers per vendor in the third party remittance posting. Currently one document number has several vendors. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
    Thanks,
    Marlo

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

    How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50?  It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
    thanks,

    After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
    - Aby
    Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

  • Third Party Remittance config for Canada

    I have a requirement as follows:
    Third Party Remittance programs are to be available for use by Canada.
    When executing program PC00_M07_K500 we get the below error message
    Entry notfound for wage type: /102
    Business number : XXXXXXXXX and prov. of employment:
    Please check table T5KRC.
    Can someone help me out with the steps to configure TPR for CAnada? I've searched everywhere but cannot find a config guide?

    I got the answer. I tested with changing the processing class it's working fine without any issues.

  • Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance

    Dear all,
    Could anyone please explain me about this concept : "Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance"?
    What this actually means and what we do in it?
    Thank you all in advance.
    Regards,
    Mamta

    hi mamta,
    this mainly decides how you pay the third parties through payroll.
    here you have to create HR payees for the third party vendors.
    then you setup the assignment of the WT to the HR payees.
    then you take the information of the G/L accounts and also others details like which G/L account is for which third party vendor from the FI people. then depending on that information you then setup the assignment of the HR payees to their respective G/L accounts.
    here you also have to decide when these payments has to be made to these third party providers.
    you enter the HR payees numbers in table T51RH.
    this is just an overview of configuration of Third party Remittance.
    reward points if it is helpful
    regards,
    salman

  • Facing a problem to run the garnishment  for third party remittances

    Hi All,
    When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00  for garnishment  for third party remittances. We got an error messages as   PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
    Thanks,
    -suresh

    Did you carry out the following two activities?
    1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
    2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

  • Third Party Remittance Process

    Hi All,
    Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US.  Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York.  SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
    To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK.  So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
    Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
    But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
    1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
    2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
    So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    transaction:  PC00_M10_U500
    This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0).  It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D.  Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
    The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

  • Third party remittance Error

    Hi
    While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
    I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000"   There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table.  but I am getting the message
    THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
    This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
    Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

    It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78.  Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

  • Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

    Hi Guys,
    While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run.  But the Information that is displayed in the output is only  for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
    If the other applicable Business Area  ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
    Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
    Thanks in advance
    Jay Gandhi

    Hi Guys,
    This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
    Have also notified SAP OSS .
    Jay Gandhi

  • TP Posting Third Party Remittance Documents Status Incorrect

    Hi everyone,
    I have run payroll to an employee and posted the results to FI Posting. Documents are posted in FI Posting. By using Tcode PC00_M99_URME - Evaluation Remittance (New) I am able to do the third party evaluation for this employee. Until this step the system is working fine. But when I am trying to execute using the T code PC00_M99_URMP - Create Posting run the system is generating incorrect documents.
    The message its showing is
    Messages for Document 0000002282Error in document: HRPAY 0000002282 LOG_800 ( Error Message )
    No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE (Error Message)
    Regarding configuration everything is correct in HR, I verified several times.
    Kindly let me know is there some thing to do reg vendors in FI such that vendors information will be updated in FI.
    Does anyone faced the similar issue earlier.
    If anyone has an idea in resolving the above issue please guide me.
    Your advices are very much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    lalitha.

    Thanks for your quick response.
    I verified the configuration, but I haven't noticed any issue.
    The problem I noticed is when we run third party evaluation run the amount of sign should be changed fron negative to positive. but its not changing.
    The processing class 73 has specification 1.
    Kindly let me know if you have any idea why  amount sign is  not reserved.
    Regards,
    Lalitha.

  • Submitting to third party application and post back creating refresh issue

    Hi,
    I am doing a web application in which I need to hit a third party application from a view and come back to the same view if the third party sends a response back.
    For this I am getting the adfCtrlState and submitting it as a postbackurl for the third party.
    After coming back to the same view from the third party, I need to go to the next activity in the taskflow without any user interaction.
    I am using the following code to find the next activity
    <af:commandButton text="AutoSubmit" id="cb2"
    action="processResponse"
    binding="#{pageFlowScope.responseBean.braodCastAction}"
    visible="false"/>
    In the responseBean : I am using the RichCommandButton to broadcast event
    RichCommandButton myEvent;
    public RichCommandButton getMyEvent(){
    if(conditions satisfied){
    myEvent.broadcast(new ActionEvent(myEvent));
    The above code is executing the action(processResponse) specified in the commandButton.
    But it is not able to find the next activity in the taskflow, if a hit F5(refresh) it is rendering the next view in the taskflow.
    My primary requirement is to execute or render the next method call activity or view after coming back from the third party application without user interaction. Is there any other way to go to the next activity without broadcasting the event ?*
    Thanks
    Mohan.

    Hi there
    I see some flaws with that.
    J41 wrote:
     It would act somewhat like an LMS where users could post their dev files on a network share.
    Dev files need to always be local. Placing on a network share for the purposes of using RoboHelp to compile or generate is risky business and may explode in your face. LMS to me means Learning Management System. Those are typically used for eLearning. RoboHelp does help systems. Captivate does eLearning. So you are losing me with your LMS reference.
    When ready to review with the customer, the would use the registration tool to push the project to preview.
    I'm lost. What "registration tool" are you even referring to here? Or is this what you are planning on creating and that's what you are choosing to call it?
    The app would call the RH command prompt using a server side technology, in my case .NET, and supply the necessary arguments and push the generated project to preview.
    There is no "preview" of projects. Preview of individual topics, sure. But not for a project. There is only compile or generate to create the final output.
    Once it had been reviewed and ready, then the user could push to production.
    Sounds like what one might typically accomplish using RoboHelp in a typical development cycle. You edit content on the local hard drive. If a review is needed, you compile or generate the content and place the output on a server. After approval is complete the content is then copied to the production server.
    Sure sounds like you are attempting to reinvent the wheel in many situations here.
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

  • Third party sales issue

    hi
    experts,
          can any body explain in third party sales where do we see migo, miro, if possible step by step process.
    thanks in advance

    Customize the third party sales in summary:
    1. Create Vendor XK01
    2. Create Material u2013 Material Type as "Trading Goods". Item category group as "BANS".
    3. Assign Item Category TAS to Order type that you are going to use.
    4. A sale order is created and when saved a PR is generated at the background
    5. With reference to SO a PO is created (ME21N). The company raises PO to the vendor.
    6. Vendor delivers the goods and raises bill to company. MM receives the invoice MIRO
    7. Goods receipt MIGO
    8. Goods issue
    9. The item cat TAS or Schedule line cat CS is not relevant for delivery which is evident from the config and, therefore, there is no delivery process attached in the whole process of Third party sales.
    10. Billing 
    SD - 3rd party sales order Create Sales Order
    VA01
    Order Type
    Sales org, distr chnl, div
    Enter
    Sold to
    PO #
    Material
    Quantity
    Enter
    Save
    SD - 3rd party sales order View the PR that is created with a third party sales order
    VA01
    Order Number
    Goto Item Overview
    Item ->Schedule Item
    SD - 3rd party sales order View the PR that is created
    ME52N
    Key in the PR number
    Save
    SD - 3rd party sales order Assign the PR to the vendor and create PO
    ME57
    Key in the PR number
    Toggle the "Assigned Purchase Requisition"
    Execute
    Check the box next to the material
    Assign Automatically button
    Click on "Assignments" button
    Click on "Process assignment"
    The "Process Assignment Create PO" box , enter
    Drag the PR and drop in the shopping basket
    Save
    SD - 3rd party sales order Receive Goods
    MIGO_GR
    PO Number
    DN Number
    Batch tab , click on classification
    Serial Numbers tab
    Date of Production
    Flag Item OK
    Check, just in case
    Post
    Save
    SD - 3rd party sales order Create Invoice
    MIRO
    Invoice Date
    Look for the PO , state the vendor and the Material
    Check the box
    Clilck on "Copy"
    Purchase Order Number (bottom half of the screen)
    Amount
    State the baseline date
    Simulate & Post
    Invoice Number
    *Invoice blocked due to date variance
    SD - 3rd party sales order Create a delivery order
    VL01N
    In the order screen , go to the menu Sales Document , select "Deliver"
    Go to "picking" tab
    State the qty and save
    SD - 3rd party sales order Create a billing document
    VF01
    Ensure that the delivery document is correct in the
    Enter
    Go to edit -> Log
    Save
    Regards
    Deepak

  • Payroll Cluster, PCALAC, Third Party Remittance

    Hello All,
    Does anyone know if the run type 'TP' for Third Party can be pulled into the PCALAC table?   I know PCALAC only showed 'PP' in older releases.  Do you know of a way to get TP to populate in this PR cluster?
    Thank you,
    Angel

    hi Michael,
    The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
    Can you please help on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sai

Maybe you are looking for