Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

Hi Guys,
While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run. But the Information that is displayed in the output is only for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
If the other applicable Business Area ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
Thanks in advance
Jay Gandhi

Hi Guys,
This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
Have also notified SAP OSS .
Jay Gandhi

Similar Messages

How to reverse third party remittance posting

We found there was some mistake for one ee's payment. But I can not just re-run the payroll and post it again because it says the third party posting has been done already.
So how can I reverse the third party posting after it has been posted to FI and the checks have been written?
Thank you.

Hi Johnson,
I got stuck at the same point. I have reversed the document now I am not able to reverse the evaluation run. Can you please explain me how to undo the entries in the remittance interface tables?
Thanks,
Amar.

Third party remittance posting - FI payments

Hello experts,
I am facing a problem in 3PR posting for Garnishment data.
For few employees though the data has been paid by AP , Garnishment history report is showing the status as 'Posted to AP'.(correct status must be - 'Paid by AP')
From HR side i confirmed that the Garnishment data has been posted successfully.The end users confirmed that the vendor payment is done.
I could find out that in remittance table T51R5 there is a acknowledgement field (REMPN) which is confirmation sent by FI once the payment is run.But in this scenario the acknowledgement field is not getting updated.
Do you have any idea how payment is done in FI ( any program or utilility that is run ) and how the acknowledgement is passed to HR module?
Regards,
Malathi V.

Hello Experts,
I got the solution for the issue.
The payment program RFFOUS_T/ RFFOUS_C was not updating the payment acknowledgement number in T51R5 for 3PR Garnishments.
The SAP Note 1130975 contains the details about this problem.Application of this note must solve the problem.
Regards,
Malathi V.

Third Party Remittance Document Numbers

Hi All,
Client would like separate document numbers per vendor in the third party remittance posting. Currently one document number has several vendors. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Marlo

Hi Mayuresh,
I am also receiving this error message. Were you able to view the simulation document?
Is it missing any authorization objects?
Thank you.
Lynn

Facing a problem to run the garnishment for third party remittances

Hi All,
When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00 for garnishment for third party remittances. We got an error messages as PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
Thanks,
-suresh

Did you carry out the following two activities?
1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

Third Party Remittance Process

Hi All,
Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US. Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York. SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK. So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
Regards,
Avinash

transaction: PC00_M10_U500
This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0). It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D. Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

Third party remittance simulation document

Hi Guys,
When i open third party remittance simulation posting document in PCP0 and when double click on vendor to see the details of payments it shows me following error.
"An explanation of some or all document lines is not possible".
Here is the detail explanation:
iagnosis
   The system cannot explain one or all document lines of this selection.
rocedure
   This problem can be caused by either:
   o   A document line item being incomplete. For more information, see the
       error explanation.
   o   The posting run having been created before the remittance
       functionality supported "detailed info on TP runs". In this case,
       the system will not be able to show the selection correctly. As a
       result, the displayed items may not add up to the total sum of the
       selected items.
We have selected the data on employee level on the config level.
On PRD posting, we can see the detailed item.
What could be the reason?
Mayuresh

Hi Mayuresh,
I am also receiving this error message. Were you able to view the simulation document?
Is it missing any authorization objects?
Thank you.
Lynn

Third party remittance issue - no documents created

hi All,
When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
Status Evaluated ! No documents created
Personnel number selected: 1
Personnel number evaluated 1
personnel number rejected 0
personnel number skipped 0
Number of errors 0
No of warnings 0
Can an one please help me on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

hi Michael,
The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
Can you please help on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50? It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
thanks,

After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
- Aby
Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance

Dear all,
Could anyone please explain me about this concept : "Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance"?
What this actually means and what we do in it?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards,
Mamta

hi mamta,
this mainly decides how you pay the third parties through payroll.
here you have to create HR payees for the third party vendors.
then you setup the assignment of the WT to the HR payees.
then you take the information of the G/L accounts and also others details like which G/L account is for which third party vendor from the FI people. then depending on that information you then setup the assignment of the HR payees to their respective G/L accounts.
here you also have to decide when these payments has to be made to these third party providers.
you enter the HR payees numbers in table T51RH.
this is just an overview of configuration of Third party Remittance.
reward points if it is helpful
regards,
salman

Third party remittance Error

Hi
While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000" There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table. but I am getting the message
THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78. Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

Third Party Remittance config for Canada

I have a requirement as follows:
Third Party Remittance programs are to be available for use by Canada.
When executing program PC00_M07_K500 we get the below error message
Entry notfound for wage type: /102
Business number : XXXXXXXXX and prov. of employment:
Please check table T5KRC.
Can someone help me out with the steps to configure TPR for CAnada? I've searched everywhere but cannot find a config guide?

I got the answer. I tested with changing the processing class it's working fine without any issues.

TP Posting Third Party Remittance Documents Status Incorrect

Hi everyone,
I have run payroll to an employee and posted the results to FI Posting. Documents are posted in FI Posting. By using Tcode PC00_M99_URME - Evaluation Remittance (New) I am able to do the third party evaluation for this employee. Until this step the system is working fine. But when I am trying to execute using the T code PC00_M99_URMP - Create Posting run the system is generating incorrect documents.
The message its showing is
Messages for Document 0000002282Error in document: HRPAY 0000002282 LOG_800 ( Error Message )
No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE (Error Message)
Regarding configuration everything is correct in HR, I verified several times.
Kindly let me know is there some thing to do reg vendors in FI such that vendors information will be updated in FI.
Does anyone faced the similar issue earlier.
If anyone has an idea in resolving the above issue please guide me.
Your advices are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
lalitha.

Thanks for your quick response.
I verified the configuration, but I haven't noticed any issue.
The problem I noticed is when we run third party evaluation run the amount of sign should be changed fron negative to positive. but its not changing.
The processing class 73 has specification 1.
Kindly let me know if you have any idea why amount sign is not reserved.
Regards,
Lalitha.

Third Party GRN Posting Date to be Copied to Sales Order Line item Billing Date

Hello Experts
I have a client requirement where in they want to bill line items in the sales order ( third party process ) to the end customer in sync with the GRN posting dates happened in the PO
For EG if GRN happened on 1st July 2014 then Billing Date should come in as 31st July 2014 so when they execute VF04 giving from and to dates as 1st july to 31st corresponding sales order can be invoiced
Actual problem is for suppose if i create a sales order in the month of june say 26th basing on the factory calendar setting and invoicing list maintained in the customer master system defaults the billing date to 30th June 2014 , and the same when user runs VF04 from 1st June to 30th June this sales order shows as due and mistakenly end user invoices the customer ( whereas logical GR would have only received in July 1st )
My requirement is similar to below threads but i am unable to find answer how to copy GR Posting date to Billing Date of the sales order line item
use GR Doc date as billing date
3rd party sales process (w/o ship notif) - Billing

Hi Lakshmipathi ji,
As my requirement is to update the billing date at the sales order line item level , As a process user goes in executes VF04
For Ex
Sales Order Created Date is 1st June 2014 then System Defaults Billing Date at line item to 30th June 2014
Now when i do GRN suppose on 1st July 2014 for that line item , system should trigger a code where in check the posting date of the GRN and override the same in the Biiling Date field of the sales order line item
So when VF04 is run for a month All the GRN which are recieved in the month of July are invoiced in July
Please share me your thoughts do we need to check any userexits from MM side which reads the posting date of GRN and then copies in to my third party sales order
Regards
Hiba

Third party remittance configuration

Hi,
Can anybody share the configuration steps for third party in Payroll.
Regards,
KV

Hello KV,
You can find some reference on:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/64/30dc98089b11d3807b00c04fadcafa/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/DE/2d/ac1f48032f11d3807600c04fadcafa/frameset.htm
Are you using the new report RPCIPE00? If so, please consider the
following information:
From SAP note 919139:
If you are using the new report (RPCIPE00), you must process the U.S.
tax wage types and "other wage types" differently:
o For U.S. tax wage types, select US tax posting wage types.
o For other wage types, select Posting a wage type.
If you are using the old report (RPCIPE00_OLD), you must process all wage types using Posting a wage type. You should not use US tax posting wage types.
Also, if you use RPCIPE00 the processing class 78, should be set up with the value "2". Which is defined as "Posting US Tax" in T7US3PR_TXSYMKO. You could do this setting in view V_512W_O."
You can access the new IMG step at: Payroll USA -> Posting to Financial Accounting -> Activities in the HR-System -> Wage Type Maintenance -> posting attributes (without U.S. Taxes).
Hopefully this helps.
Kind regards,
Graziela Dondoni

Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for