This is a Tier 1 Support TEST post. Will be deleted.

HI all,
this is a test post for spam training.
Thank you.

Blah blah.. Text text..
More text...
Begin listing items here.
orange
apple
pear
tea
Coffee
juice
Chai

Similar Messages

Testing post, please ignore/delete

This is a test message...

I hate sites like this. There's no way to get from one
sublevel to another
without going to the top level.
I suggest you not use fly-out-type menus, but instead, have
subordinate
sectional navigation on each page within a given section. You
can easily do
this with a single template using Library items in an
editable region for
the sectional navigation, or better, using server-side
includes.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Andrew_G" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:e3bcqe$1fc$[email protected]..
> Hi
>
> I have eight categories to display in my site
navigation.
> Each category has at least one (some have two) levels of
subcategories.
> For example for one of the categories :-
> Health > Level One.
> Mens Health > Level Two cascading from this.
> Prostate Trouble > Level three cascading from Mens
Health.
>
> I only want users to see the level ones (Health in the
example above) on
> initial browsing of the site and then by clicking on
these the associated
> sub-categories (of that category only) will be
displayed.
> How can I organise my navigation using templates or
libraries to allow
> this?
> With only one template it's all or nothing as far as I
can workout and I
> suppose what I want is the equivalent of 8 libraries (?)
to correspond
> with my
> 8 navigation headings.
> I hope this makes more sense to you Dreamweaver experts
than it does to me
> reading it back
> Many thanks
>
>

DO NOT REPLY this is a test post which will be deleted soon

DO NOT REPLY this is a test post which will be deleted soon
Mike Wang

Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Ask
a question
Allow time to reverse.

Error Message: "This upgrade path is not supported"

Scenario
During the process of upgrade to Windows 10 Technical Preview, we may encounter the error “This upgrade path is not supported. Please close Setup and re-launch from the root of the media or go back and pick a different installation
choice.” in the Compatibility report.
Analysis
Step 1: Perform the scenario 1: the upgrade installation fails.
Reproduce this error following the steps below:
Download the Windows 10 Technical Preview ISO installation file.
Extract the ISO installation file to C:\New folder, and now the location of the installation file is
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\.
Click setup.exe from the installation file, and then click
Install now.
Setup is starting, and then get two options Upgrade and
Custom which is the classic setup wizard which we can see during booting from DVD.
Click Upgrade to run upgrade installation, however, the error occurs.
It seems that it is impossible to perform upgrade installation to Windows 10 Technical Preview, although it is fine to click
Custom to perform clean installation which cannot keep the personal setting and applications.
However, what we want is upgrade installation, not clean installation.
Step 2: Perform the scenario 2: the upgrade installation works fine.
If extract the ISO installation to C:\New in the above step2, click the
setup.exe from the installation file C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\, the upgrade installation would work fine, which is as shown the following two figures:
Step 3: Check the setupact.log
file which contains information about setup actions during the installation of the two scenarios.
Scenario 1: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 1. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:03:40, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Unknown command line for ConX setup experience. Launching legacy setup experience.
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Determining if we are in WDS/Unattend mode
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI No need to hide autorun
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000a] UI Autorun:Autorun core successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000b] UI Autorun:Autorun UI successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI AppWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info UI NavWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info [0x0a011c] UI WizardDialogPost::SetActive
2014-10-14 19:04:57, Info [0x0a018e] UI Passing command line parameter ("C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\setup.exe /HideWelcome /uilanguage:en-US /targetlanguage:en-US") to IBS.
Scenario 2: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 2. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:08:04, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
According to the two logs, we can get the following points:
In scenario 1, it would invoke the SetupPrep.exe in the source folder directly to perform an installation preparation. However, it failed to recognize the path
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe. Then it would launch legacy setup.
In the scenario 2, Windows setup would be redirected to the ConX setup to perform upgrade installation automatically.
So, what is the difference of the scenario 1 and 2 to bring the different results of upgrade installation?
Workaround
Based on lots of testing, we find that if there is no space in the extracting location of the ISO installation
file, the upgrade installation would work fine.
What’s more, we can get the meaning of the two setup models in the setupact.log:
Legacy setup: it is same with setup from DVD boot.
ConX setup: it would check the compatibility and language UI for upgrade preparation, then perform migration and upgrade directly.
Additional Resource
From the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview, many users have installed and tested Windows 10 Technical Preview, we still hope more and more users would download and install Windows 10 Technical Preview for test, and provide
us your feedback.
Download Windows Technical Preview
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso
Download Windows Technical Preview for Enterprise
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hello,
I would guess that existence of a space in the folder name is what the issue is. Try removing the space from the folder name and see if works. New_Folder for example
Thanks, Darrell Gorter [MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Re: Why doesn't WL7.0 support get/post bindings for web services ...

hi!!!
Could you pls point to any code example.
thanks
Pushpa
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at any
code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their
get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer
and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for meto
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used
the
automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems
like
it
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that
BEA
chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in anyway?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL definesWeb services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols areused
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

This isn't a straight FORM Post as in the http binding support in WSDL. It posts
a soap message.
It's apparent that Workshop supports form-post and form-get.
But I dont see how it is done with straight WebLogic webservices. Does WebLogic
server read the web-services.xml or the WSDL file? I dont see a way to put in
http-post binding in the former and in the latter it seems to be ignored.
Can someone clarify.
Thanks.
Chu-chi
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
Here is a live example:
http://65.193.192.35:7001/base/SoapInteropBaseService
Here is an example that you can download:
http://manojc.com/?sample2
This is how you run it:
http://manojc.com/?tutorial/doc/howtorun.html
More info can be found from the edocs:
7.0:
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs70/webserv/index.html
8.1:
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/webserv/index.html
Regards,
-manoj
http://manojc.com
"pushpa krishna" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
hi!!!
Could you pls point to any code example.
thanks
Pushpa
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at
any
code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their
get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer
and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for
me
to
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used
the
automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems
like
it
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that
BEA
chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in
any
way?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL
defines
Web services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols
are
used
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

Why doesn't WL7.0 support get/post bindings for web services ...

This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation, WL 7.0 does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for me to access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used the automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems like it would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without having to write a
middle tier.
.NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that BEA chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in any way? or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshop positioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL defines Web services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message contain either message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are described abstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and message format to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstract endpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and their associated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols are used to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describe how to use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at any code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for meto
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used theautomatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems likeit
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that BEAchose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in anyway?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL definesWeb services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols areused
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

Wanting to run litmus on server2008r2 i can not report this OS , do you NOT wish testing firefox on servers ?

''Duplicate post, continue here - [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/804278]''
wanting to run litmus on server2008r2 i can not report this OS , do you NOT wish testing firefox on servers ?

'''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
* On Windows you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
* On Mac you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
* On Linux you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by quitting Firefox and then going to your Terminal and running: firefox -safe-mode (you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
* Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
[[Image:FirefoxSafeMode|width=520]]
''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
[[Image:Safe Mode Fx 15 - Win]]
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
Please report back soon.

No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet]

Hi,
I am using OHS infront of JBOSS and redirecting all requests from OHS to JBOSS after SSO Authentication.
Everything works fine except that I get 500 error when I try to post data from HTML form.
When i click on a button on a JSP page that submits page with the Form Post, the request goes to the OHS and is not getting forwarded.
OHS log shows the following
127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2007:08:57:23 -0400] "POST /Sample/protected/standard.do HTTP/1.1" 500 788
Proxy_error.log shows the followin error
[Tue Sep 11 08:57:23 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] [ecid: 1189515443:10.6.2.137:268:5568:74,0] \n[OSSO] E09: No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet].\n
Any idea?
Thanks
Srikar.

This error does no occur in our dev or test environments, only production. A workaround for us was to disable SSO by commenting the line to load it in the file $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/httpd.conf. The line to comment out looks like: include "/u01/app/oracle/product/mid/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf" where the /u01/app... above is the expansion of $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf.
We do not use SSO for our application, so this is not a problem. I next plan to try to figure out why this behaves like this, so I can keep all the server configurations consistent.
HTH,
Mark

Can anyone help me with Magicjack? after I purchased US number I am unable to log in on my Iphone, I keep getting an error "YOUR DEVICE IS NOT ON THIS ACCOUNT" I contacted MJ support but they are very much useless and dont know how to fix it!

can anyone help me with Magicjack? after I purchased US number I am unable to log in on my Iphone, I keep getting an error "YOUR DEVICE IS NOT ON THIS ACCOUNT" I contacted MJ support but they are very much useless and dont know how to fix it!

There's a whole lot to read in your post, and frankly I have not read it all.
Having said that, this troubleshooting guide should help:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1538
In particular, pay attention to the mobile device support sections near the bottom, assuming you have already done the items above it.

Please make this a good experiance for my first post on any board. READ ME

Hi all. Well first off, let me start by saying that my whole life I've owned PC's. And I'm not hacker Elliet. But I've gotten to know them pretty well. All the way from Windows 3.1 that came out a long time ago (more than 10 years ago)
So after a while of hearing about MAC's I decided to start small and get an iPod (since they are so popular here in NYC) and see what apple was about. Well I really saw that Apple had a great product and started asking about their computers. And did plenty of research. And before the new Intel Macs came out, I was going to get a powerbook. But I had a feeling a new laptop was coming out and waited a lil while and sure enough. The Macbook Pro came out. So I went out and did all my research (as to this being the first real purchase of a Apple product and knew about the possible implications of a new first gen Intel chip in a apple product litterally making history) I knew I might become a new beta tester.
So I started looking on these boards and did 2 weeks worth of hard research to see if the Mac Book Pro (MBP) was for me. And after all the problems i saw (ex: The whine, Right speaker distortion, heat coming from it, white line at bottom of screen, etc) I never saw or read anything about AOL connectivity problems. And I know, I know... alot of you are probably going to gripe and complain about AOL sucking and yada yada yada, but please. Cut me some slack. I actually like AOL. I got on it back in 92 when it came out, and really enjoyed it. And have been on it since. I like chatting on there, and so forth. And I hope you help with my problem instead of telling me to go get "a real ISP" I do have a real ISP, but I like my AOL too.
So now to my problem....
I have a Sony Viao 1.8ghz PC with 512 ram, 80 gig hard drive, 10/100 ethernet port. Connected to a Belkin Router (more info below on specs of router) connected to Opt Online Broadband Cable internet with VoIP. I use my macbook pro on the wireless network at my home.
I got a mac book pro 1.83 ghz running 512 ram on Tiger OSX 10.4.6 I thought that I would wait till a connectivity patch (which I thought would have been 10.4.6) fix the airport problems came out till I posted something. But now that I've tried everything, I'm hoping you open this thread and help me and possibly someone else out there as well. I just d/l'd and installed the 10.4.6 update last night and it did'nt help. So here's more info on my specs. I have a belkin router wireless G 2.4 ghz 54mbs router and I have configured the router with it's firewall, wap2 encryption (as it's the only selection the router has that is available that matches what airport comes with in encryption) I hid my network, and have tried to upgrade the firmware on the router.
Now Here's the real problem. I can connect to AOL on my MBP when I connect the actual ethernet cable to the MBP's Ethernet port (after I have let the cable modem do a hard reset to configure itself to a mac) I can connect to AOL. But when I disconnect the cable and return it to it's normal config, I can't connect to AOL. I can connect to the internet via safari, and firefox, and even AOL's IM on iChat. I can use Itunes all kinds of things. I can even play warcraft 3 wirelessly on battlenet. But connecting to AOL is a pain in the @$$. It's the only proggy I have that won't allow it to connect. I keep getting the error message "Your AOL connection ended because the AOL host was unable to start a new session. Please try to sign on again." Of course All i see for a while is the spinning black and white circle. And it goes through step 1 and 2, goes straight to 6. Then it goes blank, and BAM! That message pops up. And what's so frustrating is that I've tried every possible configuration on AOL, my router and even system preferences, for it to let connect. I even went into system preferences on the mac and went down the the Internet & Network "Sharing" icon and tried 100 possible combinations on that in the services tab, and firewall tab. I've turned them on, off, tried to make exceptions ETC. And no matter how much I play with the personal file sharing and windows sharing advanced settings and sigh every possible combination to make AOL connect via wirelessly. And nothing. I then even tried to fix the connection under AOL in setup. I've gone through and selected TCP Script, Airport Script. Cable Script, And practically every script I can think of. And nothing. I even went on to AOL and downloaded thier alleged fix to wireless accessing AOL. And nothing. I've been searching all over google, AOL's website, and all over these discussion boards and no mention of anyone even having the same problem. But please, someone out there with their infinit knowledge of how Macs run and having more experience than me, Please make this a good experiance for my first post on any board anywhere reguarding a mac. A MBP at that too.
An update to this, But amazingly enough, I actually got it to connect to AOL wirelessly for the first time yest. But I have no Idea how i did it. I tried for 3 hours to reproduce it and no luck. I was accessing my router at it's website config screen and somehow I clicked on connect to AOL and while it was trying to connect to it, i reset the router and BAM, it connected to AOL. And I was in shock. I thought I solved it. Somewhere while it was reseting the router it connected and stayed connected to AOL till I signed off and tried to sign back on to see if I could now connect, and guess what. The same dumb message keeps popping up "Your AOL connection ended because the AOL host was unable to start a new session. Please try to sign on again." And all I did was sign off to test it, thinking I had fixed the problem. I tried for 3 hours like I stated above, and BAM got it connected to AOL wirelessly again (somehow while the router was resetting). And thinking I fixed it, or figured out the trick to getting it to work, signed off... I kissed aol goodbye again. And have been unable to reproduce the "glitch". SIGH Can someone out there please help me?
I think I've made this message as detailed as possible, but please, can someone give me some constructive criticism on how to fix my AOL wireless connectivity problems. Do you know if it's my router? My MBP? AOL software? BTW, I got AOL software version 10.3.7 (Rev 4136.310 US) The latest version I D/L'ed from the AOL website. Anyone know If I should turn on or off some things such as personal fire sharing on, or firewall off or on? ANYTHING. Please. I've put alot of time into writing this post and making it as detailed as possible. And been having this problem for the past 3 weeks that I've had my MBP, and have waited long enough to use my AOL. If you need any further information or suggestions on making AOL work, please let me know. Thank you for taking the time to read all of this, and I really appreciate all of you in the time you take in responding back in trying to help me. I'll be monitoring this post almost hourly. So I hope someone out there can help. Thanks so much again. And help me make this transition to Mac a pleasant one knowing that there is a mac community out there willing to help a new mac client. Again, Many thanks
In Heath and Wealth,
Bruce
Mac Book Pro 1.83 GHZ 512 Ram Mac OS X (10.4.5)

I FIXED IT!
FYI for the rest of you that might be having the same problem. DON'T USE A BELKIN ROUTER WITH AOL ON A MBP!!!!! It ***** wirelessly. or even hard connected, it won't connect. I went to best buy today, and got a refund on the belkin. I then went to J&R and got a D-Link router. And now it works perfect. I can now chat on AOL yet again, and I tried all the other web browsers I have and messengers, and warcraft 3 online via battlenet. And it works great. I want to give you guys a special thanks for taking time out to answer back to my post. FYI! Belkin wireless G routers do not connect you to AOL wirelessly on MBP's. No matter how much you mess around on them. I highly recommend a D-Link Router. They are easy to set up as long as you READ ( AND I MEAN IT!!!) read the instructions before you set anything up on it. Use the CD that it comes with, and you'll be good to go. Set it up and it works great Almost no dead zones in the house, and now I can use the MBP with all it's cababilities. Thanks people. I really appreciate it.
P.S. I called belkin last night when i decided to get a refund on my router for today and when i talked to the tech, after puersuading him to tell me the truth. And stop BS'ing me, he broke down and admited that AOL does not work wirelessly on MBP's. So to make a long story short this time, There you go. And one last note, I'm very happy now with my d-link router. I honestly thought it would suck. Not being a brand name router or anything. But amazingly, it works like a brand name item! Again, many thanks all.
Bruce

For the first time, I'm trying to use adobe premiere elements10 that came with my pc Windows 8. I created a single project, saved it but cannot open it. My pc shows the file I created but I get an error message that says this type file is not supported or

For the first time, I'm trying to use adobe premiere elements 10 that came with my pc Windows 8. I created a single project, saved it but cannot open it. My pc shows the file I created but I get an error message that says this type file is not supported or the codex is not installed. As a test, I created another very small project and get the same error message, when I try to open it. Pls give me a simple answer, a refund or a phone

mike frischenmeyer
What computer operating system is your Premiere Elements 10 running on? And, what video card/graphics card does that computer use?
Is this the first time you are using Premiere Elements 10 or have you worked with it before successfully? There is no easy solution until we
know the details and troubleshoot to determined what caused the problem.
1. Can you open a new project?
2. After you saved/closed the problem project, did you move, delete, or rename any of the files/folder that were related to the source media
for that project?
3. Please review the Adobe document on troubleshooting damaged projects.
Troubleshoot damaged projects | Adobe Premiere Elements
4. What are the steps that you are using to reopen this saved closed project.
a. File Menu/Open Project/Name of Project
b. Other
Please review and consider and then we can decide what next based on your further details and results..
Thank you.
ATR

After updating to ios 7.0.6 "This accessory may not be supported"

i have the same problem since i updated it to 7.0.6 . i have i phone 4 . When i plug my phone in to charge it starts the charge for about 2 seconds and then the message "This accessory may not be supported" appears and the phone stops charging. It does that every time I try to plug my phone up to charge. Once my phone turns competely off it takes 4-10 hours to turn back on and when it does its only has 4% battery. i can conect to itunes wen have battery but dont charge! my charger is an Apple product. please can help

Answered in the other thread you posted in today reporting the same problem.
There is either a problem with the cable, or there is a problem with the iPhone which can include dirt, lint, or foreign material in the iPhone's connector port and it doesn't take much, or the iPhone's connector port has some damage which can include moisture damage.
If you have access to another cable to try that is known good, do that first.

My iPhone 5 got problem when connect with lighting cable, this will keep pop up message "this accessory may not be supported"

My iPhone 5 got problem when connect with lighting cable, this will keep pop up message "this accessory may not be supported", I can't charge or sync at all. I tried plug and unplug many time, still can't detect/charge my iPhone5, but sometime will 'lucky' that can connect to my iTunes and charge battery…
This message will auto pop up also when I don't have plug anything in my iPhone 5, It is very annoying…
The lighting cable is original and now i'm using OS 7.0.4 / iTunes is 11.1.3
What I can do to fix this problem? Thank you.

I would try using another cable you can likely borrow one to test from somebody
if it's the same then likely the connector in your iphone have been damaged

Need Suggestion about Solman support & testing E CATT feature

Hi Solman Experts .
I need your Strong suggestion. Actually i am working in ABAP module , I recently joined as a fresher in small company, I got opportunity to go Saudi for "Solman support & testing ,E CATT" in big MNC . Now i need suggestion , If i go and work there in these areas , If i return to India will i get Good Job and Salary here .
Please suggest me. please it my career issue.

hi Gafoor,
I too had this kind of oppurtunity and now i am in abhudabi in crm and solman testing. No problem in this , So you can go to saudi as your wish and the future and scope for the solman is very good. So it s reasonable to go saudi .
Regards,
Prabhushankar

Purpose of this Forum (Server General) *** Please Read Before Posting ***

Welcome to Windows Server General Forum !
This is an English TechNet forum, Please post your queries in English !
Scope:
The name "General" has a very broad significance and sometimes that might lead to some ambiguities.
The scope of this forum is to answer General "Server Administration" related queries pertaining
to Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 / R2 and 2012 operating systems.
Again, "Server Administration" has innumerous aspects and at times it becomes bit difficult to categorize
them.
We try to answer your questions in General or provide troubleshooting support in depth as and when necessary
based on the context of the query.
Questions could be related to AD, GP, Server OS related Queries/issues/errors, general troubleshooting etc…
list is too huge and it's highly difficult to elaborate them here :-)
We understand that this scope and purpose can be a little confusing, we apologize for any confusion.
If you might not know the scope or purpose of this forum, we'll redirect you to read this thread if we need
to explain how this forum works.
Out of Scope:
Queries on following (but not limited to…) are Out of scope in this forum.
Scripting
SBS
- Small Business Server
IIS
Coding/Development:
Windows Client Operating Systems
Exchange
Server
Lync
TFS
SQL
server
Visual
Studio
.Net
SharePoint:
SCCM, SCOM
Third Party Applications
etc…
We might (but do not claim to) answer some of the out of scope questions directly here. If we do,
then it's just a Bonus ! and it's not the purpose or in the scope of what this forum provides.
Moving Threads:
It may happen that, your question might have been moved to this forum in an attempt by another moderator from
a different forum to help you find the correct forum or we might move your threads to an appropriate forum as and when necessary.
If a community member gave you the URL/link of a specific Technet forum, then you may request a move to that
specified forum (If a link to the forum category is specified; you'll still need to pick a specific forum from that category) or thread will be moved to the appropriate forum if a Moderator is around.
NOTE:
We cannot move a thread to another Microsoft forum that's not in the TechNet Forum System such as ASP.net,
IIS.net and Answers.Microsoft.com etc… So we can only provide links to those forums.
Marking Answers:
We propose a reply (such as a link about where to go ask your question) to a recent question as an answer,
and then we will usually wait one week (~7 days) before we mark it as the answer. We prefer you (the Asker/OP - Original Poster) to mark the answer, but we do not require it if you abandon the thread for a long time.
If you (the Asker/OP - Original Poster) refuse to let us propose and mark an answer (without telling us why
and helping us figure out the alternatives/workarounds), then we might need to lock a thread or move it to the Off Topic forum.
Please Read Before Posting:
How
to ask a question efficiently in TechNet forum
We have dedicated Server
Forums for different products/technologies, please consider posting your queries in appropriate forum for better help and support.
If you can't figure out where exactly to post your questions, please seek help in "Where
is the Forum For...?" forum and you will be given a URL/Link to an appropriate forum where you can post your questions.
Official
Microsoft Forum Sites
Credits:
Ed
Price - MSFT (Forum Owner)
This sticky has been created inspired by the Sticky on Where is the Forum for.. forum.
Regards, Santosh
MVP - Directory Services
I do not represent the organisation I work for, all the opinions expressed
here are my own.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Blog | Wiki
If you have issues with your account verification or you can not post images, please get your account verified
by posting request in below linked thread.
Verify Your Account 7

Something new (or not noticed by me before) then as this thread appears as normal discussion in
My Thread view.
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
New UI has this functionality i.e. if you reply on a sticky, it will appears as a 'Discussion' in thread view.
Regards, Santosh
I do not represent the organisation I work for, all the opinions expressed here, are my own and posted AS IS.

This is a Tier 1 Support TEST post. Will be deleted.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for