Throughput of Cisco 3750-E

Hi,
Can anyone let me know the actual throughput of Cisco 3750-E (WS-C3750E-24TD-S) Standalone switch and the throughput when stacked with 4 nos of WS-C3750E-24TD-S ?
Is WS-C3750E-24TD-S ports oversubscribed?
Sam.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I think the 68 Gbps backplane supports the 48g port variants plus two 10g ports; i.e. 48+10+10=68.
What's a bit confusing, fabric specifications are normally "doubled" to allow for duplex ports but Cisco, in the posted spec uses the term "backplane" rather than "fabric".
Also confusing, when stacked, there's a pair of 16g stack ports too.  It's unclear whether the same backplane or fabric bandwidth is shared with those, or whether there's additional capacity to support them too.  I.e. the 3750-E might support wire rate bandwidth when used standalone but might not when stacked.
In any case, when 3750-E units are stacked, the stack ring can be a potential bottleneck.  Fortunately, besides StackWisePlus offering twice the stackport bandwidth of StackWise, it also supports (for unicast) destination stripping and also (for unicast) only puts traffic on the stack ring when it must.  Still, again, it's a potential bottleneck.  It's also a ring, not a fabric.
PS:
Besides bandwidth, you need to check a switch's PPS capacity.  I believe the 3750-E has sufficient PPS it can generally support wire rate.
However, one common problem with 2960/3560/3750 series switches is lack of RAM for deep buffering.  The 3750 series, I understand, to have 2 MB per 24 copper ports and 2 MB for the uplink ports.
The 3750 stacks are often fine for user edge ports, often not so fine for more demanding roles.
PPS:
Also believe the 3750-E is end-of-life and end-of-sale.

Similar Messages

  • Cisco ASA 5505/Cisco 3750

    I have a Cisco 5505(base license) and a Cisco 3750(48 port). I want to be able to connect to the 3750 on different vlans(for home lab),but I'm no able to ping the "outside" IP of the ASA. I can ping the different vlans from the ASA once I created the routes from the ASA.
    3750 config:
    version 12.2
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug uptime
    service timestamps log uptime
    no service password-encryption
    hostname SwitchA
    no aaa new-model
    switch 1 provision ws-c3750-48p
    ip subnet-zero
    ip routing
    no file verify auto
    spanning-tree mode pvst
    spanning-tree extend system-id
    vlan internal allocation policy ascending
    interface FastEthernet1/0/1
    description Uplink to Cisco ASA 5505
    switchport access vlan 100
    switchport mode access
    spanning-tree portfast
    interface FastEthernet1/0/2
    no switchport
    no ip address
    interface FastEthernet1/0/3
    interface FastEthernet1/0/4
    interface FastEthernet1/0/5
    switchport access vlan 10
    interface FastEthernet1/0/6
    interface Vlan1
    no ip address
    interface Vlan2
    ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan3
    ip address 10.10.1.254 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan10
    no ip address
    interface Vlan100
    description SW-to-ASA
    ip address 172.16.100.2 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan172
    no ip address
    interface Vlan182
    no ip address
    interface Vlan192
    no ip address
    ip classless
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.100.1
    ip http server
    ip http secure-server
    ASA Config:
    interface Vlan1
    shutdown
    no nameif
    no security-level
    no ip address
    interface Vlan10
    nameif users
    security-level 100
    ip address 172.16.10.254 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan172
    no nameif
    security-level 100
    ip address 172.16.100.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan192
    nameif OUTSIDE
    security-level 0
    ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Ethernet0/0
    switchport access vlan 192
    interface Ethernet0/1
    description Trunk to Switch
    switchport access vlan 172
    Is this even doable?

    Hi,
    I believe you have the problem with your no-nat configurations..... you to exempt NAT for the traffic from 172.16.10.0 (Anyconnect VPN pool) to 192.168.1.0/24 (Inside LAN) to make this work
    object network acvpnpool
    subnet <anyconnect VPN Subnet>
    object network insidelan
    subnet <inside lan subnet>
    nat (inside,outside) source static acvpnpool acvpnpool destination static insidelan insidelan
    Make sure that you are able to reach the GW/Inside ip adress of the firewall from LAN machine.... all routing in place properly..... Thanks!!!
    Regards
    Karthik

  • Unable to ping device behind Cisco 3750 on the same inside VLAN via Cisco ASA 5505 Anyconnect VPN

    Hi Guys,
    I've been stuck with this for the last 2 days, and I thought to try and use Cisco's forum, I setup my home DC, and started having problems once I moved a Cisco 5505 behind a Cisco 1841 router (I wanted to eventually test DMVPN live on the internet,) I was no longer able to ping some devices, then as soon as I introduce a collapsed core/distribution switch, I'm also no longer able to ping the devices behind the Cisco 3750, I've attached a network diagram and the ASA running-config.
    Everything seem fine internally with the exception of an intermittent network connectivity with a Citrix NetScaler VPX running on a VMware ESXi.
    For some odd reason, I am able to ping the following, with no issues.
    Cisco 3750 SVI (192.168.1.3)
    CentOS web server (connected directly to the Cisco ASA 5505)
    I have checked and enable the following:
    Nat Exemption
    Sysopt connection permit-vpn
    ACL's
    same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
    same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
    Added ICMP in the inspection policy
    Packet-capture - Only getting echo requests.
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    I believe you have the problem with your no-nat configurations..... you to exempt NAT for the traffic from 172.16.10.0 (Anyconnect VPN pool) to 192.168.1.0/24 (Inside LAN) to make this work
    object network acvpnpool
    subnet <anyconnect VPN Subnet>
    object network insidelan
    subnet <inside lan subnet>
    nat (inside,outside) source static acvpnpool acvpnpool destination static insidelan insidelan
    Make sure that you are able to reach the GW/Inside ip adress of the firewall from LAN machine.... all routing in place properly..... Thanks!!!
    Regards
    Karthik

  • How i can calculate the backplane speed & throughput of cisco 48 1G 2960S switch?

    How i can calculate the backplane speed & throughput of cisco 48 1G 2960S switch?

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Calculate?  Calculate for wirespeed/line-rate?  If the latter, take all the port bandwidths, and assuming they are duplex, double for necessary fabric bandwidth.  I.e. 48 gig ports would need a 96 Gbps fabric.  Take all your port bandwidths, and allow 1.448 Mpps per gig (for minimum size Ethernet packets), i.e. 48 gig ports would need 69.5 Mpps.  Once you have required fabric bandwidth and PPS, you can compare to vendor's specs.

  • Etherchannel two cisco 3750 stacks for iscsi?

    I have two sites connected by 96 strands of fibre. At each site I have an IBMv7000 relicating to the other one. For iSCSI traffic I have two Cisco 3750 switches, each are in 2 switch stack. 
    SAN A                         Fibre Link                          SAN B
            |                                                                        |
    Cisco Stack A =========================Cisco Stack B
            |                                                                        |
            |                                                                        |
    iSCSI Clients                                                       iSCSI Clients
    My question: Is it ok to connect the the two stacks with etherchannel using the fibre links? Will is provide the necessary redundancy, if one of the interfaces goes down?

    What model numbers of 3750 are you using?
    What is the distance between the stacks as this will dictate your fiber run modules.

  • ISCSI traffic running across Cisco 3750 Switches

    My customer has a small shop with 2 servers runnig iSCSI to a SAN device. They are looking for a switch recommendation and I would like to use a pair of Cisco 3750's, to take advantage of the VSS technology for redundancy,L3 and some other Core requirements, but I am concerned about performance.
    I thought my other option is to use 3750E's but concerned about the added costs.

    The fabric and pps ratings for the 3750Gs don't support wire-rate for more than 16 gig ports. (Max performance for 3750G models is 38.7 Mpps and 32 Gbps fabric; for 3750-E it's 101.2 Mpps and 128 Gbps fabric [NB: pps is enough, slightly insufficent fabric bandwidth for 48 port models - similar 4948 offers 102 Mpps, 136 Gbps].)
    Another performance limitation of the 3750s (and to lessor extent the 3750-Es) is stack ring bandwidth. As best I can tell, the 32 Gbps is really dual 8 Gbps duplex (dual 16 Gbps duplex for -Es). An important distinction between the original StackWise technology and the later StackWise+, the former puts a copy of all traffic on the stack, the latter suppresses unnecessary unicast. The former also requires the sender to remove the traffic from the stack ring, the latter the destination removes the traffic. (I.e. the "+" technology, really is plus.)
    For really, really demanding performance, a stack ring isn't the same as a chassis fabric (e.g. 4500s), and within a single switch, the lower end switch models, they can't always provide wire-rate for all their ports. However, the real question is whether you need this performance in a small shop even though iSCSI is being used.
    In other words, its rare to see all ports demanding full bandwidth, so a stack of 48 port 3750Gs migtht work just fine for your customer if the actual need doesn't require more than the device can supply.
    In similar situations, I present the customer with such facts. Based on what the expected load is, device "A" might work fine, but it can't guarantee performance beyond a certain level. If customer wants the capability for more performance, for growth or "just to be safe", can do too, here's your options (and extra cost) for that too.
    BTW, if SAN devices can support 10gig, then you'll need something better than the 3750G since the model with a single 10gig port has been discontinued.

  • How can I mirror all ports on CISCO 3750 switches to one Gigabyte port?

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to mirror all the ports on my 7 CISCO 3750 switches, which are in 3 separate stacks, to one single Gigabyte Ethernet port.
    Does anyone know how I can do that?
    Thanks in advance.

    Vlad, thanks a heap for your response.
    I want to apply to my sitation. Please let me know if I get them right in the following:
    Catalyst A
    vlan 901
    remote-span
    monitor session 1 source interface fastethernet 1-48 (I want to monitor all ports on the CISCO 3725)
    monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 901
    Catalyst B
    vlan 901
    remote-span (If I don't need to monitor this switch, do I still need to put anything into this switch at all?)
    Catalyst C
    vlan 901
    remote-span
    monitor session 1 source interface fastethernet 1-48 (I want to monitor all ports on this switch as well)
    monitor session 1 source remote vlan 901
    monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet 3 (There are 4 Gigabit Ethernet Uplink in CISCO 3750, I want all the traffic to go to port 3, is this the right way to do?)
    Thanks in advance.

  • Best way to connect 2 Cisco 3750 PoE 24-port Switches

    Hello. I have 2 Cisco 3750 PoE 24-port switches in a small office environment. Right now I have a trunk configured off my ASA 5505 to switch 1, and then just an access port configured on a port (switch 1) and an access port configured on a port (switch 2) to connect them together. These switches also have 2 GB SFP ports but they are not being used in this configuration.
    I was curious to know if anyone had any better recommend configurations for connecting these 2 switches together? I'm not sure if this particular model can be stacked? 

    What are the exact model numbers (should be written on a sticker)?
    You will know if they can be stacked as you will see the 2x stack ports on the back of each switch :)
    If they can then that is probably the way to go unless you want to keep them as separate switches for some reason.
    If you want them separate, I would connect them via a Trunk link at least so you can have the same Vlans on both.
    Thanks

  • Stack issue on Cisco 3750

    Hi team,
    I have an issue with the stack basing on Cisco 3750 switches.
    Today on one of them, something went wrong and all ports are down.
    Could you please advise, what happened? In what direction I should work to find root cause?
    thank you

    Hi,
    I have found out what is the root cause.
    In stack, I have 4 switches:
    1. Member
    2. Master
    3. Member
    4. Member
    But right now I have next picture
    1. Member - status "Ready"
    2. Master - status "Ready"
    3. Member - status "Provisioned"
    4. Member - status "Ready"
    5. Member - status "Ready"
    I have checked MAC addresses, I have noticed, that member 3, became member 5.
    For resolving this issue, I just need make member 5 member 3, but I don't know how to do it exactly.
    My plan is:
    - remove member 3.
    - change number of the member 5 to member 3
    Is it correct?
    Thank you,
    Igor

  • Compatibility Cisco 3750 and GBIC 1000Base-ZX/SFP

    Hello,
    I have some problems to use a GBIC 1000Base-ZX on a cisco 3750.
    With some research , i have find these thing :
    The Catalyst 3750 models support these Cisco SFP options:
    1000BASE-LX
    1000BASE-SX
    1000BASE-T
    1000Base-ZX didn't appear.
    What do you think of such thing.
    Thanks for help

    The 1000BASE-ZX SFP (Cisco product number GLC-ZX-SM=) is supported on the Catalyst 3750:
    Cisco Optical SFP Transceiver Compatibility Matrix
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps5000/products_device_support_table09186a0080212cba.html
    List price in the US is the same as for the 1000BASE-ZX GBIC (Cisco product number WS-G5487=)
    It's possible that the information you have found has not been updated yet. I believe the ZX SFPs were among the last ones to become available. The Release Notes in the link below are the first ones to mention this SFP, they refer to it as "new hardware" (versus the SX and LX SFPs):
    Release Notes for the Catalyst 3750 Switch Cisco IOS Release 12.1(14)EA1 July 2003
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3750/12114ea1/ol421501.htm
    Hope this helps.

  • SFP change on Cisco 3750-X 24S

    Hello,
    I have a Cisco 3750-X 24S equipped with GLC-GE-100FX optical module to provide 100Mbps connectivity to workstation. I have to migrate the workstation NIC to 1 Gbps and, after that, I have to replace the 100base-FX SFP with the 1 GB SFP.
    Wich initial configuration on switch port allowm me to replace the SFP without any reconfiguration on the switch port?
    Thanks
    Gabriele

    Paolo is correct in that you do not need to change the configuration for the switch to recognize the SFP.
    However some IOS versions and hardware platforms do require you to manually configure the interface speed (even though a fiber SFP only operations at a fixed speed). Check the current port configuration. If it has "speed 100", be sure to change it to "speed 1000".
    Hope this helps.

  • Challenge: Spanning Tree Control Between 2 links from Switch DELL M6220 to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior like one switch for redundancy)

    Hello,
    I have an Spanning tree problem when i conect  2 links from Switch DELL M6220 (there are blades to virtual machines too) to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior  like one switch  for redundancy, with one IP of management)
    In dell virtual machine is Spanning tree rapid stp, and in 3750 is Spanning tree mode pvst, cisco says that this is not important, only is longer time to create the tree.
     I dont know but do you like this solutions i want to try on sunday?:
     Could Spanning tree needs to work to send one native vlan to negociate the bdpus? switchport trunk native vlan 250
    Is it better to put spanning-tree guard root in both 3750 in the ports to mitigate DELL to be root in Spanning Tree?
    Is it better to put spanning- tree port-priority in the ports of Swicht Dell?
    ¿could you help me to control the root? ¿Do you think its better another solution? thanks!
     CONFIG WITH PROBLEM
    ======================
    3750: (the 2 ports are of 2 switches 3750s conected with a stack cable, in a show run you can see this)
    interface GigabitEthernet2/0/28
     description VIRTUAL SNMP2
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
     switchport mode trunk
     switchport nonegotiate
     logging event trunk-status
     shutdown
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/43
     description VIRTUAL SNMP1
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
     switchport mode trunk
     switchport nonegotiate
     shutdown
    DELL M6220: (its only one swith)
    interface Gi3/0/19
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
    exit
    interface Gi4/0/19
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 4,13,88,250
    exit

    F.Y.I for catylyst heroes - here is the equivalent config for SG-300 - Vlan1 is required on the allowed list on the catylyst side (3xxx/4xxx/6xxx)
    In this example:
    VLANS - Voice on 188, data on 57, management on 56.
    conf t
    hostname XXX-VOICE-SWXX
    no passwords complexity enable
    username xxxx priv 15 password XXXXX
    enable password xxxxxx
    ip ssh server
    ip telnet server
    crypto key generate rsa
    macro auto disabled
    voice vlan state auto-enabled !(otherwise one switch controls your voice vlan….)
    vlan 56,57,188
    voice vlan id 188
    int vlan 56
    ip address 10.230.56.12 255.255.255.0
    int vlan1
    no ip add dhcp
    ip default-gateway 10.230.56.1
    interface range GE1 - 2
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 1 mode auto
    int range fa1 - 24
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 188
    switchport trunk native vlan 57
    qos advanced
    qos advanced ports-trusted
    exit
    int Po1
    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 56,57,188
    switchport trunk native vlan 1
    do sh interfaces switchport po1
    !CATYLYST SIDE
    !Must Explicitly allow VLan1, this is not normal for catalysts - or spanning tree will not work ! Even though it’s the native vlan on both sides.
    interface Port-channel1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,56,57,189
    switchport mode trunk

  • MAC address flapping on 2 x Cisco 3750 (Stacked)

    Hi All,
    I am having some issue with my connectivity.
    The setup with HP virtual connect (VC) is as below:
    Server A NIC 1 -- VC 1 -- Switch A
                 NIC 2 -- VC 2 -- Switch A
    Server B NIC 1 -- VC 1 -- Switch A
                 NIC 2 -- VC 2 -- Switch A
    The VLAN configuration are done on individual NIC card on the servers and the switchport on Switch A facing the VC connect are all on trunk mode.
    Currently I am seeing MAC address flapping on my Switch. The switches are CISCO 3750 and are being stacked so it appears logically as 1 switch.
    Any idea what might be the problem?
    Below is an output of the flapping on the switch.
    %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host xxxx.xxxx.0637 in vlan 1 is flapping between port Gi2/0/3 and port Gi2/0/5
    %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host xxxx.xxxx.46eb in vlan 1 is flapping between port Gi1/0/5 and port Gi1/0/7
    %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host xxxx.xxxx.661d  in vlan 1 is flapping between port Gi2/0/15 and port Gi2/0/7

    Hi,
    Problem of MAC FLAP could resolve by following methods:.
    Check with the server providers to see if the OS and server platform support 'NIC' Teaming (NIC Bonding).
    FYI - NIC teaming allows users to group two or more physical NICs into a single logical network device called a bond. Once a logical NIC is configured, the virtual machine is not aware of the underlying physical NICs. Packets sent to the logical NIC are dispatched to one of the physical NICs in the bond and packets arriving at any of the physical NICs are automatically directed to the appropriate logical NIC. If one of the underlying physical NICs is broken or its cable has been unplugged, server will detect the fault condition and automatically move traffic to another NIC in the bond.
    Hope that help
    If helpful do rate
    Ganesh.H

  • HP 6600 connected to Cisco 3750

    Hello,
    I have a new hp 6600-24XG 10gb switch. I would like to connect it to an existing cisco 3750 core switch so the hp will see the network. Is it possiblle to connent one of the 10 gig ports to the 3750's one gig port and set the speed to one gig?
    Would I have to buy a module for one or the other of will this just now work?
    I appreciate any feedback.
    Thank you

    miczellcisco wrote:Hello,I have a new hp 6600-24XG 10gb switch. I would like to connect it to an existing cisco 3750 core switch so the hp will see the network. Is it possiblle to connent one of the 10 gig ports to the 3750's one gig port and set the speed to one gig? Would I have to buy a module for one or the other of will this just now work?I appreciate any feedback.Thank you
    According to HP's product page, the ports in that switch are 10 GbE only - so no you can't connect to it at one gig.
    You could buy a 10 gig module for your 3750 switch - a C3KX-NM-10G (SFP), C3KX-NM-10GT (Copper) or C3KX-SM-10G (SFP with advanced features like Netflow), install it and use that to link to your HP switch.
    Cheers

  • LACP between SRW2048 and Cisco 3750

    Hi,
    I have been trying to set up a LACP link between my SRW2048 and Cisco 3750 using two gigabit ethernet links.
    Whenever i plug one cable in the interface does not come back up.
    I have already sucessfully been able to create a LACP link between the 3750 and a catalyst 2960 for two cables.
    Both interfaces at both units are set up as trunks for Vlans 1 (default and untagged), 4, 99, 101, and 102, then the Port-channel / LAG set also as a trunk with the same vlans.
    Does anyone have any ideas why the interface is not even initialising?
    If i plug a SRW2048 LAG'd interface into a normal access (vlan1) port on the 3750 it works fine, and vice versa with the 3750 to the SRW2048.
    Below is a extract of logs from both:
    -- Log from SRW2048
    1   2147483579   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  ch1            
    2   2147483580   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  Vlan 102            
    3   2147483581   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  Vlan 101            
    4   2147483582   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  Vlan 99            
    5   2147483583   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  Vlan 5            
    6   2147483584   07-Oct-2008 16:12:24    Informational   %TRUNK-I-PORTADDED: Port g4 added to ch1            
    7   2147483585   07-Oct-2008 16:12:19    Informational   %LINK-I-Up:  g4            
    ## Plugged back into standard vlan1 access port ##
    ## Plugged into LACP enabled port on 3750 ##
    ## Unlugged from standard vlan1 access port ##
    8   2147483586   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  ch1            
    9   2147483587   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  g4            
    10  2147483588   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  Vlan 102            
    11  2147483589   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  Vlan 101            
    12  2147483590   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  Vlan 99          
    13  2147483591   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %LINK-W-Down:  Vlan 5            
    14  2147483592   07-Oct-2008 16:11:10    Warning   %TRUNK-W-PORTREMOVED: Port g4 removed from ch1    
    -- Log from Catalyst 3750
    mercury#terminal monitor
    mercury#
    Oct  7 15:10:44: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet   1/0/17, changed state to down
    Oct  7 15:10:45: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17, changed state    to down
    Oct  7 15:11:54: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/17, changed state    to up
    Oct  7 15:11:55: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet   1/0/17, changed state to up
    mercury#

    The linksys documentation is a little thin on the ground all over.
    However, if i have got this correct the Admin key needs to be the same for all interfaces in the same LAG for one switch i.e not the same for both ends of the cable?
    As for the priority, i assumed this was to do with how the switch dealt with with interfaces were to be active if there were more in the group than could be allowed - to allow for backup links. Is this correct?
    Thanks for your reply.

Maybe you are looking for