Thumbnails Darker Than Whats In Camera

I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC TZ3, brand new. Almost all of my imported pictures from my vacation appear much darker with so much contrast than what appears on the window of my camera, I would like some help with this. I have loaded thousands of other pictures from my old camera into an older version of iPhoto and never had this problem, is it the camera or the iPhoto, I'm lost?

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. It may be the color profile that the camera is embedding to the file. Export one to the desktop, open with Preview and type Command+i. In the Info pane you'll see the profile listed. Compare that with one of your older photos. You may have to calibrate your monitor to the new camera.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

Similar Messages

  • Prints are darker than what appears on PC screen

    Windows Vista Business OS
    Acer laptop PC
    PSE6
    Good morning.
    I'm so hoping that someone has an easy solution to this printing issue.
    In PSE6, I've created 85 scrapbook poem pages in the following format:  300 dpi; 12 x 12 size that will be reduced to a print size of 8 x8.
    I worked all summer on this project for my 98-year young grandma who is the author of these poems.   Gram is spry and healthy, but given her age, we are both concerned that it will take a long time to remedy the problem - if the only solution to lighten is to go through each layer of all 85 pages and reset the light intensity.  As she says in jest, "time" is really not on her side.  This is our second poem book project - the first was handmade scrapbook poem pages that were printed directly from a UPS copycenter printer.
    For this second project, I printed some test copies of a couple of pages on my inkjet Lexmark printer.  Photo quality paper:  the printed copy was much darker than what appeared on the laptop PC screen - details couldn't be distinguished. Lower quality paper:  the printed copy had a faded looking print.
    I will be taking the PDF format of the pages to the UPS copycenter, again.  I've been told that the prints can be lightened, however, I'm concerned that the quality of the print will be compromised.
    Any easy solutions to resolve this problem?
    Thank you.
    Shinlee

    Any suggestions or comments about this topic?  I've been told by the UPS copy center that lightness/darkness modifications can be made from their printer; however my concern is that the print quality will be affected (i.e. lightening will cause a faded look).

  • FCP 7 Viewer is Darker than what it should be

    In my current FCP7, while project and sequence is under Pro Res 422, the viewer displays darker images, i tried to change the System Setting>Playback Control>Gamma Correction to Approximate instead of Accurate, this increased the gamma(brightness) of the clip a fair bit, but even when comparing to a normal footage played in QT7 (with FCP Compatability disabled or not) in FCP, it's still a littlebit more washed, grey-ish, not as vivid as playing in QT7
    I know this is a known bug, and i remember solving this problem last time by changing some codec somewhere in FCP project to another coded instead of 422, then back to 422 and that solved the problem, i'm not sure
    any help?
    Thanks

    Hey videogal3
    After a bit of research back then, I found a temporary solution, I've now switched to FCPX so I didn't bother anymore, but here it is
    in System Settings under FCP7
    under Tab Playback Control
    Under Gamma Correction: Change from Accurate to Approximate
    Mind you, In my own experience, I dont think that's close to what u see in quick time either, but it certainly is better than before, at least not dark where u can't see. And after exporting, the movie is fine too
    So Yeah, hope this helps
    Cheers

  • Prints always come out darker than in lightroom

    I have a iMac, keep my screen calibrated using x-rite. I have found that all my prints come out darker than what I am seeing on screen. It almost seems like when I export a RAW file to JPG in lightroom it converts it to a denser image. As if it were taking 1/3 of the exposure out. I have done experiments with my own printer at home, as well as with two different labs here. I have downloaded the icc profiles of the different labs and have used PS4 to preview my images. There is no comparison and I can not see what step I might be missing to complete the process from image on screen to image on paper. Any help?? Thanks.

    True, I have seen a difference in the density of the prints from the lab and from my home printer and it is possible that I have used the printer settings in lightroom incorrectly. It is interesting that the prints from the lab are much denser than what I see on my screen. I loose overall brightness and detail in the shadows. It seems like my colors are correct but with the loss of brightness it is hard to tell exactly. It almost seems to me as if somehow the conversion that lightroom does has something to do with how it is interpreted by the lab printer. The first test I did was to use the printer wizard (I have a cheapie epson home printer, epson stylus 405) just to see what would happen. My print came out EXACTLY as I see it on screen. That is what is my challenge. I can attach a file if it would help. THanks for all your responses.

  • New HDR Image darker than preview

    Today I was using Adobe Bridge to combine sets of 3 photos with different exposures to create HDR images and sending them to Photoshop. So far today I made 20+ such images and successfully saved them into PSDs.
    I just ran into an odd problem. After clicking 'Merge to HDR' in the Bridge -> Photoshop option, Photoshop did it's thing of merging my 3 images. The preview window came up, it looked perfect, so I clicked 'Ok'. Then it created an Untitled document (as it always does), except that this image is much darker than what was shown in the preview. I tried doing some light adjustments, can't get it to be what I saw in the preview window.
    All of my other HDR creations were exactly the same as I saw in the preview window. What's going on?

    One important thing to keep in mind is that what you see on screen when <br />working with 32-bit images IS NOT the actual image. There are no monitors at <br />least consumer priced monitors that can show 32-bit's of data. What you are <br />seeing is a faked representation. You will only see the real image when you <br />convert out to 16-bit or 8-bit.<br /><br />Also, many video cards allow you to set 32-bit color in the control panel <br />(Windows, can't speak for the Mac) this is NOT the same thing as a 32-bit <br />HDR image. The 32-bit color is the number of colors NOT the dynamic range <br />from darks to lights it is this dark to light data that can't be seen on <br />monitors.<br /><br />BTW I just recently learned this from a podcast from the digital photography <br />connection. The have Lightroom and Photoshop podcasts and just recently <br />covers HDR for both programs, this was covered as was PhotoMatix.<br /><br /><br /><[email protected]> wrote in message <br />news:[email protected]..<br />> Once you hit okay in the preview window and Photoshop creates the 32-bit <br />> image, you may want to try going to your view menu and adjusting your <br />> 32-bit viewing options.<br />><br />> [edited by host]<br />><br />> Hope this helps!<br />> -Kurt

  • Photos sent to Online printing service darker than on calibrated monitor

    ok, I know that prints are typically darker than what is shown on the screen(with loss of detail in the shadows that was visible on the screen.) I calibrated my monitor using both the eyeone display 2 puck and coloreyes software using gama 2.2, D65, Luminance 120. (which calibrated closely to using the eyeone software. I am using a 2008 macbookpro laptop. I like the colors on the screen and I exported the files using sRGB but also checked the soft proof and both the soft proof and exported photos (in preview) looked fine.
    Here are my questions. I used black point compensation, is this correct?
    Also, knowing that the photos are printing darker what is the best way to compensate? Should I use the gamma adjustment on the export or should I perform an adjustment on the photo in aperture? (If in aperture which adjustment?)

    Can you print them yourself? How do they look?
    IME, Black Point Compensation should be used (I forget why, but it is recommended).
    If prints you make look right, I would bring it up with the on-line printing service.

  • When printing books from iphoto the pictures are darker than on computer, Why, and what can be done?

    When having apple print books using iphoto dthe printed pictures are much darker than shows on computer.  Why, and what can be done to correct?

    What color profile are the photos - th best is sRGB or camera RGB - Adobe RGB is very often reported to print too dark
    LN

  • When I load Safari on my IPAD2, the web page comes up, but I can't scroll down the page. No matter what web page I go to the content stays darker than the navigation bar. This just started today. All other applications work fine.

    When I bring up Safari on my IPAD2, the web page comes up, but I can't scroll down the page. This just started today. No matter what web site I go to, the content is darker than the navigation pane.

    If it's happening on all sites, then assuming that it's Safari that you're using, have you tried clearing it's cache : Settings > Safari > Clear Cache (other browsers should have similar options, possibly within the actual app instead of within Settings). You could also try closing the app completely : from the home screen double-click the home button to bring up the taskbar, then press and hold any of the apps on the taskbar for a couple of seconds or so until they start shaking, then press the '-' in the top left of the Safari app (or whichever browser you're using) to close it, and touch any part of the screen above the taskbar so as to stop the shaking and close the taskbar.
    If that doesn't work then you could try a reset : press and hold both the sleep and home buttons for about 10 to 15 seconds (ignore the red slider), after which the Apple logo should appear - you won't lose any content, it's the iPad equivalent of a reboot.
    If it's only happening on a particular site then there may be content on that site that isn't supported on the iPad e.g. flash, java, silverlight

  • I have two printers:  Epson XP-950 and an hp Photosmart 7520.  Both print photos that are darker than they appear on the PC screen.  What can I do to set them to printg what is shown on the screen????

    I use Photoshop Elements 12 for my photos.  I have a constant problem where my photos don't print like they appear on the screen.  They come out darker than the screen shows.  If brighten them in the program, I have to almost make the photo appear "white" in order to look good printed.   ??????  What can I do to fix this problem?? 

    sneakypete1 a écrit:
    I use Photoshop Elements 12 for my photos.  I have a constant problem where my photos don't print like they appear on the screen.  They come out darker than the screen shows.  If brighten them in the program, I have to almost make the photo appear "white" in order to look good printed.   ??????  What can I do to fix this problem??
    I am ready to bet that your display is much, much too bright (like all displays at factory settings.
    Why Are My Prints Too Dark

  • Why do I get a darker printed picture than what I see on the screen of my iMac

    why do I get a darker printed picture than what I see on the screen of my iMac

    Because your screen is calibrated incorrectly? Because you are using an Adobe RGB color profile instead of the recommended sRGB? Because your printer is not working correctly?
    With no information other than "it does not work" guesses are all that one can provide
    What set up do you have? What color profile are you using? How is your screen calibrated?
    What else can you tell us?
    LN

  • When I use the iPhone 5 camera zoom in, the picture takes of a lower image than what is on the screen? Anyone else?

    When I use the iPhone 5 camera and I zoom in, the picture takes of a lower image than what is on the screen? Anyone else?

    You mean like they do in the TV crime show shows like CSI?  A cell phone screen from 20 feet is going to be way too small to make any sense of. 

  • Lightroom displays files and exports files darker than the original or from Photoshop

    Hello all.
    I would first like to preface this by stating I am not technically minded, and I know nothing (or very little) of ICC profiles etc.
    Though assume someone will attempt to tell me to do something with them in a really technical way which I won't understand, please treat me like a 4 year child in this regard.
    I am using Lightroom 5.6 on a Mac running 10.9.4 I have CS6 Photoshop and have a Spyder 3pro calibration device and have linked all of the Adobe programs to the output of the calibration to "hopefully" ensure quality control.
    I recently have been scanning analogue film and importing this into Lightroom 5. I have noticed that the file imported always looks darker than the original.
    When I have exported from Lightroom them they look like crap.
    There are no import additional settings as they are all turned off. I did that when I installed LR.
    I have also noticed than whenever I imported a Raw file for some reason the original file would look great for a second then when clicked on would also change to something less appealing. But I digress.
    So in attempt to show what is happening. I have created some images to illustrate my problem.
    Also it does not matter if I turn the soft proofing on or off.
    Lightroom Softproof on
    Lightroom Softproof off
    Lightroom vs Photoshop Histogram - Very similar
    Left: File opened from Lightroom as the Original      Right: Original Photoshop File
    Left: File opened from an Export from Lightroom      Right: Original Photoshop File
    Any clues as this is very annoying and at the moment makes Lightroom 5 unusable.

    Can you put one of your scans somewhere, like www.dropbox.com, and post a public download/share link to it?   I'd like to try one of the scans on my computer, though, to see if it does the same thing.  You can crop an original down to something smaller that includes sky and trees like your screenshots show.
    I am guessing there is a gamma problem or a profile problem somewhere.  What Profile do the scans have embedded in them from the scanner?  You can turn on the three Ask checkboxes in your color-settings and see what it says when you open an original in Photoshop.
    My guess is that LR is using a default profile that doesn't match what Photoshop is using, but perhaps there is a gamma issue, too.
    Have you tried opening one of the originals in the Camera Raw plug-in, perhaps from Bridge or just from PS / File / Open.  You may have to set your PS Camera Raw settings to prefer ACR for TIFs.  ACR and LR should be about the same in file handling so it'd be interesting to see if that is the case.

  • Why do images I export look darker than they do in Aperture?

    I'm using Aperture 3.2.3.  Onscreen Proofing is on and set to sRGB IEC61966-2.1.  In my image export settings, I've also selected sRGB IEC61966-2.1 and Gamma Adjust is set to 1.0 (which should mean no change, right?).
    If I export an image and then view that image outside of Aperture (using Photoshop, Preview, even just selecting the image in the finder and pressing spacebar to view it), the image looks darker than the same image looks in Aperture.  But I'm using the same Onscreen Proofing and image export setting of sRGB IEC61966-2.1.  What's going on here?

    Thanks Leonie, the second part revealed that I have been an idiot, although the behaviour is still surprising. The folder has a mix of DMC-G3 raws, Fuji X10 raws, and DNG files produced from both. For the Fuji X10 files, the DNGs produce images and the raws produce the "Unsupported file format" message. The latter is not surprising, the former a little surprising (as I've heard that DNGs only work when the associated raw works). The last two remarks don't directly address my problem (or perceived problem), but they perhaps set the frame for my expectations.
    For the G3 files, when I look at it more closely, the G3 raws DO display correctly, while the G3 DNGs give "Unsupported file format". I had managed to fool myself into thinking it was the other way round (Aperture does rather hide the full file name).
    So I was completely wrong, Aperture does support DMC-G3 raw, it's just it's DNG support that's a bit weird. However, it's on my side if I need to use X10 raws (via the DNG step). In fact so far I've given up the latter, as the noise levels are so much greater than in Fuji's in-camera JPEG conversion.
    So, thanks very much for your help. Now I remember the first rule of system support: never trust what the customer tells you! (I know you're not really customer support, but I guess the same rule applies.) Thanks again

  • Can I use thumbnails rather than the {sitename} to load different galleries?

    Hi all-
    I'm new to Spry and all things Javascripting but I'm attempting to construct a image gallery using Spry in Dreamweaver CS3. I've used the "Original Photo Gallery" from the Spry Demo folder as a jumping off point and everything works correctly.
    I would like to know if it is possible to use representative thumbnails rather than the select dropdown to launch the different galleries? I'm sure it is, but I'm a total neophyte and have no idea what to do. I'd like to set up a AP Div with 9 thumbnails in a table that would each launch a different gallery. How do I do that?
    Jimmy

    Hello, because you're SELECTing tournament.tourtype in the SELECT list, the answer is not really. If you didn't need t.tourtype in the SELECT list, you could have:
    select m.memberid, m.lastname, m.firstname
    from member m
    where exists (select 1
            from entry e inner join tournament t on (e.tourid=t.tourid)
            where m.memberid=e.memberid
                and upper(t.tourtype)='OPEN');And you know the t.tourtype is 'OPEN' anyway, so you don't need to SELECT it. So you could have this, and the answer is yes:
    select m.memberid, m.lastname, m.firstname, 'OPEN' tourtype
    from member m
    where exists (select 1
            from entry e inner join tournament t on (e.tourid=t.tourid)
            where m.memberid=e.memberid
                and upper(t.tourtype)='OPEN');Edited by: SeánMacGC on May 7, 2009 2:09 AM

  • Problem with image control using more than 1 web cam

    Hi,
    I am using logitech quickcam pro 4000.Actually I want to get image from
    3 web cam at a time wich will act as a CCTV.I want to get picture from
    more than 1 web cam at a time.But,When I start the .vi,than I get image
    from 1 web cam.I have attached the vi and the demonstration file.
    If anyone  has any idea please send me a reply.
    (The code was constructed using information
    from the Logitech Software Development Kit, downloaded from the Logitech web
    site January 4th 2004.  This
    package includes the royalty free distribution with the camera driver.
    To install the package, download and unzip
    LabVIEW Logitech UWA.zip and run Setup.exe in the 'redist' folder.  This installs drivers (if not already
    installed).  Then run LabVIEW and open
    Logitech Image Acquisition Master.vi. 
    Click the LabVIEW run button.
    Notes for Understanding the Code
    [1] The camera is controlled by an Active-X
    reference from a front panel Acitve-X container that displays the pre-view
    image.  To create this, create a blank
    Active-X container on the front panel and select the Active-X Hydra Video
    Portal class.
    [2] Three methods are called, following the
    Visual Basic guide from Logitech.  The
    first establishes a connection to the Active-X server.  The status bar is activated in the preview
    window (EnableUIElements), and we connect a camera (ConnectCamera2).
    [3] Here we set the value of property
    'EnablePreview' to turn on the preview panel.
    [4] We can get the camera description for
    camera zero here (the first camera connected).
    [5] Here we select the video format (64x480
    – can change it later).  The next call
    establishes the preview size by setting property values.  The preview size should be the same as the
    video format for fastest image acquisition.
    [6] We are restricted to saving the picture
    to a BMP file and then reading it in again. 
    This is a limitation of the SDK. 
    After reading the image file we can change it to a JPG if we wish to.
    [7] Here we re-read the image file and
    provide it to ImageDisplay.vi.
    Other methods and property values are
    reasonably self evident.  In LabVIEW, if
    you right click the Active-X reference terminal on any method, you can create a
    new method by simply selecting the appropriate one from a list.  The parameters for the method appear
    automatically and should be reasonably self-evident from the names.  If you want more details, download the SDK
    from Logitech.
    Other methods allow you to make movies in
    real-time or time-lapse sequences.
    Note that you can also monitor Active-X
    events to detect inputs or parameter changes made elsewhere.  For example it is possible to detect when
    the button on the camera is pressed.)
    Thanks
    Kabir
    Kabir mamun
    PhD Student,DCU
    [email protected]
    www.iward2010.blogspot.com
    Attachments:
    Logitech Image Acquisition Master.vi ‏98 KB

    Hi Peter,
    Thanks for your e-mail.And sorry for late.
    I have changed my activex server in my labview programme.Current 
    server name is XVideoOCX.I have attached 1 example.Still I am facing
    the same problem that I am not getting disply from more than 1 web
    cam.So would you be able to advice me,what should I do regarding this
    matter.
    Actually,This is a part  of my M.Sc project.I am under pressure.Peter,Please do me  this fevour.
    Thanks
    Kabir
    1 eample from help file:
    Video Disply
    1. Choose the input mode (Video, Single Image Files, Screen, etc.)
    XSetInputMode(0) // This
    chooses video as input
    2. Choose the video device
    XSetVideoInput(0) //
    Choose the first available video input device
    3. Initialize XVideoOCX
    XInit() // Initialize
    XVideoOCX
    4. Start internal video capture
    XStart()
    now XVideoOCX should display the live video
    5. Stop internal video capture
    XStop()
    6. Close XVideoOCX
    XClose()
    Kabir mamun
    PhD Student,DCU
    [email protected]
    www.iward2010.blogspot.com
    Attachments:
    ax2.vi ‏23 KB

Maybe you are looking for