Thumbnails for large files

OK..so now I've learned that for my large panorama filesI wont get a thumbnail in the Organizer. Just some Blue Triangle warning with a exclamation point. I do allot of golf course work where I stitch phototos and print 38 x 11 inches @ 300dpi.
So whats the work around? Is this a problem in the Bid Photoshop program? Sure I can....copy the file...reduce the resolution..save it with a different name..etc.
What the heck! You can't tell me that the program writers at Adobe can make this work for large files! Why the limit? By the way...what is the limit?
Thanks

By the way...what is the limit?
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402760.html
Juergen

Similar Messages

No Thumbnails for AVI files in organizer

My AVI Video clips are not showing thumbnails in the PSE 11 Orgazizer.
Here is what I have observed as I have been troubleshooting this:
The files are MJPEG.
When I double click on it in the organizer window, I get audio, but no video.
If I open the file for edit in Premier Elements, the video thumbnail shows up in project assests and the video correctly plays in the Premier Elements editor.
If I double click on the files in Windows Explorer they open up in Quicktime Version 7.
The thumbnails for the files show in up windows explorer when I browse to the folder they are in.
I selected a file in PSE, chose 'Export to New File" and the file that I created by doing that showed a generic Quicktime icon without the thumbnail in windows explorer. When I double click on that file it correctly plays in Quicktime.
Selecting "Update Thumbnail" has no effect.
Thumnails are corrctly showing for .mov, .mpg and .mp4 file types.
Any one have any ideas what is going on with the organizer that might be causing this beavior or is this a know limitation of PSE Organizer. What is the point of having the organizer supporting video If I can't see the video without opening it in the Premier Elements Editor?
I am providing the "Systems Info" if that helps anyone.
Elements Organizer 11.0.0.0
Core Version: 11.0 (20120923.r.32287)
Language Version: 11.0 (20120923.r.32287)
Current Catalog:
Catalog Name: My Catalog
Catalog Location: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Elements Organizer\Catalogs\My Catalog\
Catalog Size: 49.1MB
Catalog Cache Size: 578.7MB
System:
Operating System Name: Vista
Operating System Version: 6.0 Service Pack 2
System Architecture: Intel CPU Family:6 Model:7 Stepping:7 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP
Built-in Memory: 3.9GB
Free Memory: 905.8MB
Important Drivers / Plug-ins / Libraries:
Microsoft DirectX Version: 9.0
Apple QuickTime Version: 7.73
Adobe Reader Version: 10.1
Adobe Acrobat Version: Not installed
CD and DVD drives:
E: (HL-DT-ST DVDRAM BUS: 1 ID: 1 Firmware: GH24LS50)

I do not use Organizer, but instead Adobe Bridge (included with some other Adobe programs, like Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator and Premiere Pro), or ThumbsPlus (Cerious Software), and find that some AV formats/CODEC's just do not display thumbnails. I have had that issue with some, like MPEG-1 files, some WMV files, almost anything with DivX, or Xvid.
I have not used any MJPEG files, so cannot comment on them, but have helped others Import and edit those (never tried to work with any in Organizer, Bridge or ThumbsPlus), and in those cases, it usually boiled down to having the exact MJPEG CODEC installed. As each camera mfgr. seems intent on tweaking the MJPEG CODEC, it is normally possible to Import and edit, if THAT particular MJPEG CODEC is installed, and usually from the camera's utiltiy disc. Other times, the generic Morgan, or MainConcept MJPEG CODEC's have worked - though that seems to be less often, as Nikon, Panasonic, and others, keep tweaking.
As for the display of any problem AV files, it is usually an inability of the organizing utility to find a proper display, though in some cases, there IS a display, but the first Frame of the AV file is black, with a Dip-to-Black (in this case basically a Fade-in) Transition.
Good luck, and I wish that I had a fail-safe way to always display a thumbnail for ALL AV files, and even better, the ability to set the Poster Frame to what I wanted. So far, no organizer utility, that I have seen, can display thumbs for ALL AV formats - some will handle some AV formats/CODEC's, that others will not, but none has been perfect.
Hunt

Thumbnails For QuickTime Files In Windows XP?

Windows XP shows thumbnail previews of video files in Windows Explorer. However, it doesn't show thumbnails for QuickTime files. Does anyone know why this is? Does Windows Vista also share this problem? Is there a way to add this feature to Windows XP?

One other thing to explore - do these particular files begin with Black Video?
Good luck,
Hunt

PSE 12 Has stopped showing thumbnails for new files

PSE 12 has stopped showing thumbnails for new file imports. Have Windows 8.1 update

In the PSE12 Organizer, the last files imported show an hourglass thumbnail. I am importing from the camera card. Other images have the correct thumbnail. I see the spinning icon on the lower bar showing it updating the catalog. Thank you for your assistance

Cs6 bridge not showing thumbnails for raw file

Just upgraded to CS6
cs6 bridge not showing thumbnails for raw files.
Can see thumbnails in CS5.1 bridge and LR 4.2 which fortunately i did not uninstall.
Bummer since I am up against a hard deadline.
Really Sucks

We can't know. You are not offering any system information or e.g. info about what image files you are working with. Since they do show up in your otehr programs, my assumption would be that you need to switch the Camera Raw engine back to the 2009/2010 version in Photoshop and not use the default new 2012 one. Perhaps your thumbnails will appear then....
Mylenium

Thumbnails for mkv files

After installing Perian and Movist (a video player software), I believe that I have solved most of the problems for mkv files in Leopard. I can play .mkv videos in either Quicktime or Movist, and I can tap the spacebar to quicklook the video when browsing in Finder. But one thing that I cannot change is that the thumbnails for these files remains a generic icon, unlike .mov files that have thumbnails of the screens of the movie. Thus when I'm browsing with cover flow, I can only quicklook the mkv files in pop-out window, rather than playing it in the upper part of Finder as what I can do with .mov or .avi files.
Is there anyway to improve this? I know Mac may not support .mkv files as good as .mov, so I'm wondering if there's any third party softwares that I can rely on to resolve this problem? I'll be grateful if somebody could shed some lights on this.

Hope someone knows it. Thanks again!

Need PDF Information for large files

Hi experts,
I need some information from you regarding PDF related.
is there any newer adobe version for large files support - over 15mb, over 30 pages.
is it possible Batch technology with PDF
if not please suggest me Possible adobe replacements.
Thanks
Kishore

Thanks so long.
acroread renders the pages very fast. That's what i want - but it's proprietary:/
For the moment it's ok but i'd like to have a free alternative to acroread that shows the pages as quick as acroread or preloads more than 1 page.
lucke wrote:Perhaps, just perhaps it'd work better if you copied it to tmpfs and read from there?
I've tried it: no improvement.
Edit: tried Sumatra: an improvement compared to Okular etc. Thanks.
Last edited by oneway (2009-05-12 21:50:10)

Faster alternative to cfcontent for large file downloads?

I am using cfcontent to securely download files so the user
can not see the path the file is stored in. With small files this
is fine, but with large 100mb+ files, it is much, much slower than
a straight html anchor tag. Does anyone have a fast alternative to
using cfheader/cfcontent for large files?
Thanks

You should be able to use Java to handle this, either through
a custom tag or you might be able to call the Java classes directly
in Coldfusion. I don't know much about Java, but I found this
example on the Web and got it to work for uploading files. Here's
an example of the code. Hope it gives you some direction:

I don't see thumbnails for PDF files in my Windows Explorer

Hi,
When browsing through my File Manager to look for files, I used to be able to see a thumbnail of any PDF files I'd saved.
I can still see the old ones created earlier, but my more recent files just show a black square with the Adobe 'A' in bottom right hand corner or sometimes a large Adobe 'A' on white field with "PDF" in top left corner.
Seeing a thumbnail I think helps to find your file. Does anyone know why I don't get them any more or how to get them back. (The save a thumbnail option is checked for normal word docs, but not visible when saving as PDF.
I am using Mic Office 2010 (Word) to save as PDF. My computer is Windows 7 64bit.
Interesting, I can see a preview of PDF files which is a help, but not individual thumbnails for my more recent files....can still see them for older, longer ago saved PDFs.
Added info:
Just checked, I last had thumbnails in December 2011, January 2012 I stopped getting them.
Tried to insert a picture to show you what I get in explorer, but just get a big dark grey square so I'll explain. Just worked out the following.
Prior to end of 2011 my PDFs have a thumbnail.
After that I just have a black square with the Adobe 'A' in bottom right hand corner if I create PDF with Word
If I do 'Save As' while in the reader I get a large Adobe 'A' on white field with "PDF" in top left corner
Message was edited by: Corvus Orru
NO, NOT THAT SIMPLE, now I find some normal thumbnails later in 2012, so the behaviour is changeable!!!!!
Message was edited by: Corvus Orru

did you install acrobat x and does it work as expected?

SharePoint Foundation 2013 Optimization For Large File Transfer?

We are considering upgrading from WSS 3.0 to SharePoint Foundation 2013.
One of the improvements we want to see after the upgrade is a better user experience when downloading large files. It can be done now, but it is not reliable.
Our document library consists of mostly average sized Office documents, but it also includes some audio and video files and software installer package zip files ranging from 100MB to 2GB in size.
I know we can change the settings to "allow" larger than default file downloads but how do we optimize the server setup to make these large file transfers work as seamlessly as possible? More RAM on the SharePoint Foundation server? Other Windows,
SharePoint or IIS optimizations? The files will often be downloaded from the Internet, so we will not have control over the download speed.

SharePoint is capable of sending large files, it is an HTTP stateless system like any other website in that regard. Given your server is sized appropriately for the amount of concurrent traffic you expect, I don't see any special optimizations required.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.
I see information like this posted warning against doing it as if large files are going to cause your SharePoint server and SQL to crash.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/praveenh/archive/2012/11/16/issues-with-uploading-large-documents-on-document-library-wss-3-0-amp-moss-2007.aspx
"Though SharePoint is meant to handle files that are up to 2 gigs in size, it is not practically feasible and not recommended as well."
"Not practically feasible" sounds like a pretty dire warning to stay away from large files.
I had seen some other links warning that large file in the SharePoint database causes problems with fragmentation and large amounts of wasted space that doesn't go away when files are removed or that the server may run out of memory because downloaded
files are held in RAM.

FTP Sender Adapter with EOIO for Large files

Hi Experts,
I am Using XI 3.0 version,
My scenario is File->XI->FIle, I need to pick the files from FTP Server , there are around 50 files in it each of 10 MB Size.
So i have to pick the files from FTP folder in the same order as they put into folder , i,e.., FIFO.
So in Sender FTP Comm channel , i am Specifying
Qos = EOIO
queue name = ACCOUNT
whether the files will be picked in FIFO into the queue XBTO_ACCOUNT?
So my question is,
what is the procedure to specify the parameters so that it will process in FIFO?
What would be the BEST PRACTICE to acheive it for better performance point of view.
Thanks
Sai.

Hi spantaleoni ,
I want to process the files using FTP protocol which should be in FIFO ,
ie.., Files placed first in a folder should be picked up first and remaining one next and so on.
So if i use FTP ,
Then to process the files in sequence i.e, FIFO
the processing parameters
Qos= EOIO
Queue name = ACCOUNT
would process the files in FIFO.
and to process large files (10MB size) what would be the best Polling interval secs.
Thanks,
Sai

File Splitting for Large File processing in XI using EOIO QoS.

Hi
I am currently working on a scenario to split a large file (700MB) using sender file adapter "Recordset Structure" property (eg; Row, 5000). As the files are split and mapped, they are, appended to a destination file. In an example scenario a file of 700MB comes in (say with 20000 records) the destination file should have 20000 records.
To ensure no records are missed during the process through XI, EOIO, QoS is used. A trigger record is appended to the incoming file (trigger record structure is the same as the main payload recordset) using UNIX shellscript before it is read by the Sender file adapter.
XPATH conditions are evaluated in the receiver determination to eighther append the record to the main destination file or create a trigger file with only the trigger record in it.
Problem that we are faced is that the "Recordset Structure" (eg; Row, 5000) splits in the chunks of 5000 and when the remaining records of the main payload are less than 5000 (say 1300) those remaining 1300 lines get grouped up with the trigger record and written to the trigger file instead of the actual destination file.
For the sake of this forum I have a listed a sample scenario xml file representing the inbound file with the last record wih duns = "9999" as the trigger record that will be used to mark the end of the file after splitting and appending.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ns:File xmlns:ns="somenamespace">
<Data>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001924"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001925"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001926"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001927"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001928"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"001001929"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
     <Row>
          <Duns>"9999"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Cage_Code>"3NQN1"</Cage_Code>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </Row>
</Data>
</ns:File>
In the sender file adapter I have for test purpose changed the "Recordset structure" set as "Row,5" for this sample xml inbound file above.
I have two XPATH expressions in the receiver determination to take the last record set with the Duns = "9999" and send it to the receiver (coominication channel) to create the trigger file.
In my test case the first 5 records get appended to the correct destination file. But the last two records (6th and 7th record get sent to the receiver channel that is only supposed to take the trigger record (last record with Duns = "9999").
Destination file: (This is were all the records with "Duns NE "9999") are supposed to get appended)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<R3File>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001924"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001925"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
     <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001926"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</xtract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001927"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001928"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Extract_Code>"A"</Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
</R3File>
Trigger File:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<R3File>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"001001929"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Ccr_Extract_Code>"A"</Ccr_Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
          <R3Row>
          <Duns>"9999"</Duns>
          <Duns_Plus_4>""</Duns_Plus_4>
          <Ccr_Extract_Code>"A"</Ccr_Extract_Code>
     </R3Row>
</R3File>
I ve tested the XPATH condition in XML Spy and that works fine. My doubts are on the property "Recordset structure" set as "Row,5".
Any suggestions on this will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Mujtaba

Hi Debnilay,
We do have 64 bit architecture and still we have the file processing problem. Currently we are splitting the file into smaller chuncks and processsing. But we want to process as a whole file.
Thanks
Steve

Seeburger As2 Receiver channel exception for large files

Hello Folks,
We have JMS to seeburger AS2 interface we are facing follwing issue in As2 reciver channel for files larger than 20 MB.But In Production it is wokring fine for even 40 MB also.
Delivering the message to the application usingconnection AS2_http://seeburger.com/xi failed, due to:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException:javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException:SEEBURGER AS2: org.apache.commons.httpclient.ProtocolException: Unbuffered entity enclosing request can not be repeated. # , SEEBURGER AS2:org.apache.commons.httpclient.ProtocolException: Unbuffered entity enclosingrequest can not be repeated. # .
Please through some light on the issue .
Regards
Praveen Reddy

Hi Praveen,
The problem would be related to server size. genrally test system do not have same sizing as production server due to that you can not process large files in test system.
check the sizing of the system.
regards,
Harish

Bridge CS6 not generating correct thumbnails for RAW files

I'm running Bridge CS6 (the latest version, 5.0.2.4) on a 2013 MacBook Pro (OSX 10.9.1) and suddenly as of today Bridge is no longer updating the thumbnails for my RAW files. All other image and video file formats are having thumbnails generated but not my Nikon NEF raw files including those which I have previously worked on in ACR. I have tried purging the entire cache, restarting Bridge and even rebooting my computer and still the raw thumbnails are not being generated.
Any advice would be appreciated thank you.
Eric
Actually I've just noticed that thumbnails for jpegs are not being generated either. A thumbnail is only generated if I work on a file in Photoshop and then save it.

Check you cache disk free space. You should have at least 15%. For a 700g drive that that 100g free.
Have you reset preferences? Hold down option key and start bridge. You will get a reset window.

PSE4 - No thumbnails for .TIF files (Fuzzy TIF problem?)

My PSE4 newly installed on my Win XP. But, I just catalogued the first 100 of my black-and-white photos into the PSE Organizer. These were all a standard format of 4x6" at 300 dpi gray scale files. But, while the .jpg files show thumbnails in the Organizer, the .tif thumbnails show up as black rectangles. Still these .tifs can be viewed in the PSE editor, and when I resave them as a .psd file, a thumbnail shows up in the Organizer for the .psd. (Oh, an attempt to resave the original file in PSE as .tif didn't help).
Post script -- I just tried to catalogue a few of my more recent 4x6" gray scale .tif files as I described above. I noted that the thumbnails for the .tif files showed up in PSE Organizer for just a second or two, and then promptly changed to black rectangles. Interesting
But I have hundreds of such .tif photos still to be catalogued: (1) Am I going to have to resave each file as .psd, and (2) is there any downside to .psd as long as I'm using Adobe software? I just noted that my online photo processor (Fuji) doesn't accept .psd files.
I saw in the forum about PSE4 encountering the "fuzzy .tiff" problem but couldn't find a full explanation anywhere. I had the impression that not all .tiffs are created equal! I think most of mine were created by Adobe Photoshop 7 that I once had access to. I'm really worried that PSE4 is not going to work out for me.

Check out this thread:
Carol Baidinger, "Photos turn black" #12, 14 Dec 2005 5:55 pm
I don't use Windows, so I don't know if you'll find anything helpful, but I'm sure you'll at least get some comfort from knowing you're not the only person experiencing a problem with TIFF files in PSE 4.0. :(

Thumbnails for large files

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for