Thumnails different than images

All of a sudden a few of my thumbnails are different than my acutal image. I rebuild my library, didn't work. By looking at the file name, I can tell the image is correct, but the thumbnail is incorrect. Any other ideas?

Yea, this *****. I have this disease, as well.
There's another thread on it somewhere. The best advice was to export the project and re-import. That assumes you know which ones are bad! I have nearly 30,000 images -- how the heck am I supposed to find all the bad thumbs, export, and re-import?

Similar Messages

Print with preview different than image using ICC's

Hello;
I am using CS2. Suddenly when I print with preview and choose "any" icc profile, I see an off color image. This off color image is printed off color and not what I originally had. It is approximately 1/2 to one stop density lighter (and redder) and the shadows are cyan/blue, instead of neutral black.
If I choose Adobe RGB as the profile and print, the image is close but not correct. This is happening with CS2 and elements 6.
Of course the r1800 is set for ICM and off - no color adjustment.
I have down loaded new profiles, reinstalled my epson r1800, checked for missing files in CS2.
I am running windows XP Home, 2gig memory, dell xps. I have been using this system for over two years without a problem until now.
Does any one know where I can check for the problem and how to correct for it?
Thanks

On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:44:44 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
Ok, it's not ink, so I'll take another shot at this one.
> I am using CS2. Suddenly when I print with preview and choose "any" icc
> profile, I see an off color image. This off color image is printed off
> color and not what I originally had. It is approximately 1/2 to one stop
> density lighter (and redder) and the shadows are cyan/blue, instead of
> neutral black.
I can't determine whether you mean the print preview dialog's image, or the
preview that is optionally displayed by the Epson driver. The preview
shown by the Epson driver (as opposed to the one shown in the CS2 print
preview dialog) is misleading. The reason is that the RGB values for the
printer are being displayed directly on your monitor. Epsons tend to print
a bit on the cool side, so it's normal for the image to have an overall
reddish look to it.
You say two other things that seem ambiguous to me. One is that if you
choose "any" icc profile, the colors change. Does this include your
monitor profile, and other profiles such as sRGB and Adobe RGB? If they
all appear the same, then I would suspect that something is highly out of
kilter here - for example that you have ICC enabled in your printer driver
settings and are double profiling. The second thing is that the final
printed output matches the off color preview image. I have no explanation
for this, other than random coincidence.
It's hard to be definitve, about either of the above points, because I'm
not sure which preview image you are referring to.
> If I choose Adobe RGB as the profile and print, the image is close but
> not correct. This is happening with CS2 and elements 6.
Printing to Adobe RGB should produce very subdued colors, yet you are
seeing close to normal colors. Again, a puzzle that would cause me to
check your printer driver settings. It is very easy to double profile, and
with Epson's this almost always produces a magenta image.
> Of course the r1800 is set for ICM and off - no color adjustment.
For Windows, I'm used to the Epson drivers providing you with about four
choices, which include a "no color adjustment" choice, manual,
PhotoEnhance, and an "ICM" choice. On the Mac, I believe you can select
ICM from a pulldown, then disable color adjustment with a separate check
box which disables the pulldown. If you could explain this descrepancy
that might be helpful.
> I have down loaded new profiles, reinstalled my epson r1800, checked for
> missing files in CS2.
Next step is to reset your prefs - hold down shift, ctrl, alt during
startup and say yes when it asks for your first born child.
> I am running windows XP Home, 2gig memory, dell xps. I have been using
> this system for over two years without a problem until now.
>
> Does any one know where I can check for the problem and how to correct
> for it? Thanks
Read Ian Lyons's web page on how to set up your color prefs
http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps9_colour/ps9_1.htm
After resetting your prefs, and going over your color settings, I would
advise you to do a systematic test as follows:
o Set your printer, and photoshop's working space to sRGB mode
o Create a one inch by 8 inch neutral gradient
o Print it, and verify that the gradient is reasonably neutral, and about
the right brightness.
o Set your printer to no color correction
o Have Photoshop print using the profile for your printer
o If the gradient looks wrong - too dark, or with color casts as you
descrive, the problem may be a bad profile. Use Curvemeister's profile
plotter to get an idea of the quality of the profile, whether it has abrupt
breaks, etc.
http://curvemeister.com/downloads/profileplotter/dercurvemeisterprofileplotter.zip
If you decide the profile is bad, and cannot find another one, then live
with PhotoEnhance mode over sRGB, and specify sRGB as the printer profile
in Photoshop. Work that way until you find a better profile.
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com

Email image attachment preview (pre Photoshop) is different than image file

I saved an image from the web to my desktop, which I then tried to attach to an email. I selected the file in the finder, but an earlier pre-Photoshop version of the image came up as the preview. How is this possible?
In this case, the saved image was a picture of 3 clones of the same person. The preview showed only one of that person (no evidence of Photoshop effects)

You have not provided any information that would allow troubleshooting.

Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
[IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

The image in iPhoto is different than the photo

when I select an image in iphoto the picture I click on is different than the one I chose

Back up your iPhoto library, Depress and hold the option (alt) and command keys and launch iPhoto - rebuild your thumbnails - it may take a few attempts
LN

Pint out different than monitor image

The print outs I get with Lightroom look competely different than any other program's printouts including Adobe Photoshop CS2. The color is not the same. I assume this relates to color management, but I set up the monitor and Photoshop seems fine. Lightroom colors are washed out in comparison, though both look similar on screen. What is going on? How can I fix this issue?

Jeremy, first look at the posts/threads on this here on the forum. There are lots and I am sure you will find the solution to your dilema.

How to add different background image for submenu items???

Hi all,
I'm pretty new to web design and CSS in particular. Here's my problem...
I've got a Spry horizontal menu bar (untouched as yet), and I want to have a different background image for my submenu items than that of my menu items. From searching the internet I think that I need to apply a class to the submenu item (please correct me if I am wrong).
How would I go about doing this and how would I assign the class to just the submenu items?
Also ideally I want to have my first and last menu items to have rounded corners on one side (therefore making a rounded edge menu bar), is it possible to have a different background image for individual menu items? If so, how?
Really appreciate any help!

Thanks for the link! I've managed to sort the background issue, and it seems to be working fine!
Just one little issue left to tackle...
I want my text to be centered in my top menu items BUT aligned left in my drop down menu items. I have managed this but the text hugs the left hand side. I've tried adding a little margin to the left but that doesn't seem to affect anything???
Here's my CSS... Any ideas which class I should be targeting or why adding the margin isn't working would save my tearing the rest of my hair out! thanks! (screenshot attached).
@charset "UTF-8";
/* SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css - Revision: Spry Preview Release 1.4 */
/* Copyright (c) 2006. Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved. */
LAYOUT INFORMATION: describes box model, positioning, z-order
/* The outermost container of the Menu Bar, an auto width box with no margin or padding */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal
    margin: 0;
    padding: 0;
    list-style-type: none;
    cursor: default;
    width: auto;
/* Set the active Menu Bar with this class, currently setting z-index to accomodate IE rendering bug: http://therealcrisp.xs4all.nl/meuk/IE-zindexbug.html */
ul.MenuBarActive
    z-index: 1000;
/* Menu item containers, position children relative to this container and are a fixed width */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li
    margin: 0;
    list-style-type: none;
    position: relative;
    text-align: left;
    cursor: pointer;
    width: 120px;
    float: left;
    height: 24px;
    padding-top: 0;
    padding-right: 0;
    padding-bottom: 0;
    padding-left: 0;
    background-repeat: repeat-x;
    background-color: #333333;
    background-image: url(../images/navbar_bg.jpg);
    border-right-width: 1px;
    border-left-width: 1px;
    border-right-style: solid;
    border-left-style: solid;
    border-right-color: #000000;
    border-left-color: #666666;
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li li
    list-style-type: none;
    position: relative;
    text-align: left;
    cursor: pointer;
    width: auto;
    float: left;
    height: 24px;
    background-color: #333333;
    background-image: none;
    padding: 0;
    margin: 0;
    left: -1px;
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li li a
    list-style-type: none;
    position: relative;
    text-align: left;
    cursor: pointer;
    float: left;
    height: 24px;
    background-image: none;
    font-size: 12px;
    font-weight: normal;
    border: 0px 0 0;
    width: 120px;
    font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    padding: 0;
    margin: 0;
/* Submenus should appear below their parent (top: 0) with a higher z-index, but they are initially off the left side of the screen (-1000em) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul
    margin: 0;
    list-style-type: none;
    font-size: 100%;
    z-index: 1020;
    cursor: default;
    width: 120px;
    position: absolute;
    left: -1000em;
    height: 24px;
    padding-top: 0;
    padding-right: 0;
    padding-bottom: 0;
    padding-left: 0;
/* Submenu that is showing with class designation MenuBarSubmenuVisible, we set left to auto so it comes onto the screen below its parent menu item */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible
    left: auto;
/* Submenus should appear slightly overlapping to the right (95%) and up (-5%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul ul
    position: absolute;
    height: 24px;
    width: 120px;
    margin-top: -5%;
    margin-right: 0;
    margin-bottom: 0;
    margin-left: 95%;
/* Submenu that is showing with class designation MenuBarSubmenuVisible, we set left to 0 so it comes onto the screen */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible ul.MenuBarSubmenuVisible
    left: auto;
    top: 0;
/* Menu items are a light gray block with padding and no text decoration */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li a
    display: block;
    cursor: pointer;
    text-decoration: none;
    font-style: normal;
    text-transform: capitalize;
    text-align: center;
    white-space: normal;
    padding: 0px;
    height: 24px;
    font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    font-size: 12px;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #FFFFFF;
    line-height: 20px;
    margin: 0px;
/* Menu items that are open with submenus are set to MenuBarItemHover with a blue background and white text */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li a.MenuBarItemHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible
    background-color: #000000;
    background-image: url(../images/navbar_bg_hover.jpg);
    background-repeat: repeat-x;
    line-height: 22px;
ul.MenuBarHorizontal li li a.MenuBarItemHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover, ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarSubmenuVisible
    background-color: #000000;
    background-image: none;
    background-repeat: repeat-x;
    width: 120px;
    font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    font-size: 12px;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #FFFFFF;
/* Menu items that have a submenu have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenu and are set to use a background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenu
    background-repeat: repeat-x;
    background-position: 95% 50%;
    background-color: #333333;
    background-image: url(../images/navbar_bg.jpg);
/* Menu items that are open with submenus have the class designation MenuBarItemSubmenuHover and are set to use a "hover" background image positioned on the far left (95%) and centered vertically (50%) */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a.MenuBarItemSubmenuHover
    background-repeat: repeat-x;
    background-position: 95% 50%;
    background-color: #000000;
    background-image: url(../images/navbar_bg_hover.jpg);
BROWSER HACKS: the hacks below should not be changed unless you are an expert
/* HACK FOR IE: to make sure the sub menus show above form controls, we underlay each submenu with an iframe */
ul.MenuBarHorizontal iframe
    position: absolute;
    z-index: 1010;
/* HACK FOR IE: to stabilize appearance of menu items; the slash in float is to keep IE 5.0 from parsing */
@media screen, projection
    ul.MenuBarHorizontal li.MenuBarItemIE
    display: inline;
    f\loat: left;

TA24505 Why do d600 raw's look totally different than the jpg's that are imported together. When I select a raw, it looks as if it gets adjusted, but I can't figure out why...

When I import nef files from nikon D600, the pictures look good in the preview, but that's just because the preview is a jpg, generated by the camera. When I select the image, it looks like it is processing something and a totaly different (darker) images is presented in the preview window and the thumbnails. In the adjusment window no adjustments look active/selected.
Is the diference because Aperture cannot proces my Nef files the right way or are there some default adjustments selected in Aperture, somewhere that I'm not aware of? Maybe some default import setup...?
I use the latest updated version of Aperture, I'm new to aperture and understand the concept but am not familiar with all the tools.
Anyone?
(thanks in advance!)

Thanks Leonie,
I think this also answers my question:
Are you per chance using the in-camera setting for D-Lighting? If so, this is a Nikon proprietary use where the camera intentionally underexposes the image, then applies in-camera processing to bring it back to normal exposure that offers a slightly enhanced dynamic range. Unfortunately, Nikon does not share how this is done and it can only be rendered by their own software options.
Aperture, or any other third party RAW image processor, can't easily match these proprietary processes in any exact fashion ... they have to develop their own ... not just for one camera or one brand ... but all those they support ... even if they would try to match these in-camera settings ... the likelihood that they would satisfy more than a small batch of users is quite low ... tone and color results are purely subjective so finding a match that would please everyone is almost impossible.
This is why if you plan on using a third party RAW processor like Aperture, it is best to avoid using the in-camera processing settings. Rather you should create your own presets within Aperture to achieve your goals. In this instance, it is better to allow your chosen RAW processor to do the work, rather than the camera do the processing.
The reason you see the change in the image as Aperture loads it, you initially see the embedded jpeg preview from the NEF file. Then Aperture creates a new more accurate view based upon Aperture's RAW processing engine.
See the answer in context

Lightroom displays colors differently than Photoshop

Lightroom (and my image previewer - IfranView) display my image colors differently than photoshop. This is very disturbing (why can't Adobe make this simple!)!
Image in question - see below. Center image is Photoshop, left is Lr 4 and right is InfranView.
Colorspace: AdobeRGB 1998
Image color (exported the TIFF file in Lr, what is shown below): AdobeRGB 1998
NOTE: when I export out as sRGB, IfranView displays it correctly (I don't know why, it can't display ProPhoto correctly, but never had a problem with AdobeRGB). Lightroom looks incorrect when viewing the TIFF, AdobeRGB JPEG and sRGB JPEG.
What is going on?? I've tried this on two computers now and it is the same problem!

The larger file is Adobe RGB and the smaller file is sRGB. I see no difference in overall tone or color between the two files in LR 3, LR 4, LR 5, PS CS5, PS CS6, PS CC 2014, or Windows Photo Viewer which is color-managed, aside from an almost imperceptible change in the darkest blacks which I'd expect since you're converting AdobeRGB to sRGB at some point.
I can make the Adobe RGB one look like it does at the left of your first screenshot if I Assign Profile: sRGB to it in PS.
Since your monitor appears to be wide-gamut and therefore similar to Adobe RGB, I think the problem you're having is that LR thinks the monitor is sRGB for some reason, perhaps due to your switching the cables from one computer to the other without rebooting and recalibrating. It's also possible that your profile is stored in the monitor rather than in the computer and one computer understands this and the other doesn't so you're getting double-profiling or no profiling occurring.
It sounds the your only issue is having two computers attached alternatively to one monitor without having a valid profile on each computer for that monitor and aren't restarting each computer to load that profile. At least that is my analysis given the limited information.
I would conclude that nothing is wrong with LR or PS just the hardware connections and the color management confusion between the two computers, not your confusion, the computers'.

The way Aperture renders my Nikon RAW (NEF) files look different than...

The was Aperture renders my NEF files looks different than NX...
Ok so I use all the in camera setting/tools to the best of abilities to try and cut my editing down as much as possible but when shooting RAW I end up having to tweak every images to get them back to what they really look like... I shoot often RAW and JPG combined and when I open a NEF in NX and a JPG in PS they are identical and need very little work, when I use Aperture the NEF files are very different looking from the JPG (or NEF in NX) and every single one needs tweaking (I get more redish/pinkish skin, often a hint of green cast to (slightly off WB/tone thing) and more contrast.
Below is screenshot showing the difference between a JPG (or NEF in NX) and a RAW file in Aperture
[img]http://www.pbase.com/ray645/image/120052970/original.jpg[/img]
This is just a silly snap shot in very flat overcast light, and has the least amount of shift or difference of any image type so far, when I use strobes, shoot for a more contrasty image, gel for color and manual WB the differences are huge almost to the point that you would think you where looking at two completely different images and not the same NEF opened in different software.
How do I go about getting Aperture to render my NEF's more like what I shot like NEF in NX, JPG in anything, and even the back of the camera screen?

Thank you, that seems like will work, just having the boost turned down a bit on import has helped tremendously but I cant stop feeling like I am moving towards the "Fix it in post" mentality
I will need to get better at tweaking my images... No matter how I try I cant kill the pinking skin or the very faint green glow in blond hair or bright neutral tones without affecting other areas of the image.. I am sure I will figure it out but anyone having any tips or links that could speed up my process I would appreciate it.
The green is weird its like someone snuck a small florescent light into all my shoots without telling me, not major but enough to be annoying.
I shoot a ton of motor sports (3000 images a weekend) and shoot JPG and have gotten good at using in camera pre sets, knowing what I got and getting it right in the camera, I wish Nikon would give up the code or whatever is needed for all the info to be carried over to Aperture..... I would pay the $100 or whatever to use the NX engine in Aperture

32 bpc linear workflow -- render different than preview

Hi,
I've been experimenting with a 32 bpc linear workflow and have run into an issue where what I see in the preview window (what I want) looks very different than what is rendered out. The difference seems to be caused by a curves adjustment layer-- it almost seems like it is ignored on final output.
A screenshot of the preview window:
What the image looks like during a RAM preview or when rendered:
The RAM preview looks correct though (or like the 1st image) when I go to Preferences-->Previews-->set "Color Management Quality" to "MoreAccurate"
I'm using sRGB linearalized working space. Outputting to an 8 bpc TIFF sequence with output profile set to sRGB (I'm not sure what to do with the "Convert to Linear Light setting"-- does "On for 32 bpc" mean on when the input is set to 32 bpc, or when the output is set to 32 bpc? -- either way this setting doesn't appear to fix the issue)
This particlular project doesn't really use any of the things 32 bpc is good for, but I'm very interested in figuring out a fix for future use.
Here's the project file if anyone is interested in taking a look:
cs6 version
cs5.5 version
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks!
--Ross

You must have use display color management turned off or simulate output set incorrectly. Notice the difference between this setup and your screenshots.
If you are going to use color management you must use the whole banana. You must calibrate your monitor. You must render to formats that support color management. With only a portion turned on output will never match the preview.
One more suggestion. If you're having problems with a render please send us a project with the failed render still in the render CUE. Your projects were comps only.

Publishing different than preview

I am working on a training video series about Moodle. I have carefully previewed the project to confirm that everything is timed correctly and matches the audio.
However, the published version displays something much different than the preview. Errors include:
- 1 slide displays smaller and in the top left corner instead of the full screen area, making all the highlights wrong
- images from one slide are staying around on another slide
- transitions (fade in/fade out) do not look right in the published version
What is going on?

I publish these videos in mp4 format.
I do not understand how the publishing mode would be the issue because I have successfully published over 20 videos using the same mp4 mode. These errors seem like a publishing bug that does not happen all the time.
Am I missing some kind of setting that will allow the publish to produce the same thing that I see when previewing my work?
Additional errors found with other recent videos:
- audio cuts in and out (plays correctly during preview)
- text does not appear (appears during preview)
Is there any way this could be a computer issue rather than a Captivate issue? It seems Captivate related since I am publishing from Captivate...sometimes the videos turn out right, sometimes they have these random errors. However, Captivate does run slowly on my computer - would that be a cause for publishing problems?
Thank you for any direction that you can provide.

920 cartridge looks different than the old one

I just bought some new ink cartridges for my Officejet 6500a 710n-z printer. I bought the same 920 XL cartridges that I have bought and successfully installed before. However, the most recent ones would not install!
These new cartridges are different than the others -- on the bottom, they only have the gold-colored contact plate. The others had the gold plate and a little bubble-like item that I think was called an ink window. Other than that, the cartridges are exactly the same.
Have these cartridges changes? What do I need to do to make them work in my printer?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello BezaNH,
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
Sorry to hear about the issues with the Officejet 6500 not reading the new generation cartridges. I believe I found a document that may help you resolve this.
Some steps you will have done such as, remove and install cartridges, I would still suggest following through with all the steps. The images of the cartridges are that of the older generations cartridges, the steps are the same regardless.
'The following ink cartridge appears to be missing or damaged' Error Message Displays on the Printer....
Let me know how those steps work out, I will be keeping an eye on the thread.
JERENDS
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

Safari shows colors different than other browsers and GoLive

Does anyone know why Safari shows colors differently than Firefox, Explorer and Opera, Mozilla and Golive?
For example if I use "websafe" colors in photoshop with 2.2 gamma and sRGBie...2.1 and save, then import into Go Live with the working space the same, North America Web/ Internet, the colors are typically darker, although occasionally they are the same.
I have tried embedded profiles and non embeded.
The difference only happens when I view the page in Safari. By the way I use a mac, GoLive CS2
This is a constant frustration. I have created several tests but have found no satisfactory results. I am in the process of creating a website for teachers who use powerbooks and safari. And this color change really restricts creative possibilities. If the same page is viewed in Firefox it looks like it does in GoLive.
Thanks for any help,
Kevin

>> When no profile is in use.. Safari will assume sRGB becaus this is the web standart profile...
True on Windows Safari and other Windows browsers.
Safari on Mac and other Mac browsers 'assumes, assigns, applies' the Mac's default monitor profile to untagged color.
This is easy to proof here in the sRGB rollover:
http://www.gballard.net/psd/go_live_page_profile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html
If Mac Safari 'assumed' sRGB on untagged files, then the sRGB rollover will have zero change.
+++++
>> converting to sRGB before saving for the web ensure god color in all browseres, and JPG and PNG can be savde with color profile
Except in Mac browsers that have 1.8 monitor gamma profiled.
The Mac-specific problem with trying to match tagged graphics on matched-color background in Safari is:
1) The color background is untagged and will Assume default Monior RGB.
2) The tagged graphic will be Converted to Monitor RGB.
In other words, if you fill a page with 4bb93c and place a tagged sRGB image, filled with 4bb93c, the two colors won't match up in color-managed Mac web browsers like Mac Safari...however, if you untag the sRGB file, it will disappear on the page, but it will be off color depending how close Monitor RGB is to sRGB profile in Mac browsers.
Windows, on the other hand is a different beast, it Assigns sRGB to untagged color, so tagged/untagged sRGB will be good in all Windows browsers.
At least that is what I have seen here on my Windows Vista Business box.

Dreamweaver CS4 Preview Different Than Live?

Hi,
I need help/guidance figuring this out:
when the page is displayed in Dreamweaver CS4 design view the top menu is aligned properly, the font size is according to the CSS code and all other tags like H2 or H4 are properly displayed
same when I choose to see the new page in "Preview In Browser" (F12) in Firefox or Safari (I'm on Mac Book)
if I choose to preview the new page on "Live View" or after uploading to the server and view it in any browser suddenly the top menu is left aligned and all H tags are not displayed correctly.
This is a new development so the URL is on the hosting server as an IP: http://65.254.68.145
I tested with W3C and it passed.
Any pointers are appreciated.
Thanks,
Joseph

Thanks SnakEyez02 for your reply,
Most of the time I use "Preview in Browser" or [F12] and that shows me the same as the design view which in this case is different than actually viewing the page on the web server (live). I do understand your point for setting dimensions on the menu box and I'l do those changes, but maybe you can also give me your opinion for the H2 tags, as you can see in the 2 images attached to the original post, bellow the menu there are H2, H3 and H4 tags and they look different as well, it's like only part of the style.css is applied.
Thanks,
Joseph

Thumnails different than images

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for