Time Capsule is just to slow to use with Time Machine

I just knew I was going to run into this problem. I bought the TC 1TB and have a MacBook Pro. I setup time machine and right now it is backing up 173GB of data. I started the backup 13 hours ago and it has only backed up 23GB so far. I have the laptop connected directly to the TC using Ethernet. I wish Apple would have put a FW800 port on this thing for the initial backup. At this rate it is going to take approx 5 days to do the initial backup. If I should lose power or the connection I assume I have to start all over again. However, that is not the worst part. Once this is done, what if I have a system failure or want to format my system and restore from a Time Machine backup. At this rate that means it would take 4-5 days to restore my system before I could even use it. Guess I have to go back to using Time Machine with an external FW800 drive and consider my money spent on the TC a waste.

To reset, you simply use a pen tip and engage the reset button (located on the back panel) for 5 seconds. The unit will cycle on with a fresh slate. This will delete any backup files and all settings of your wireless network.
Based on my experience and by reading other posts, I suspect some of us received defective units with wireless problems. I have had similar issues with slow transfer speeds and my ATV no longer streams content over the network. I did the reset, started from scratch, but still no luck. BUT, my uncle has set up the exact type of network with his TC, and backups and ATV work without a glitch.
Now the question is, how do I get a new one (I assume the stores are sold out).

Similar Messages

  • Why is it taking 19 hours to encode four avi. files. I just bought a new 21" iMac last week and it is just to slow to use. Thanks

    I just bought a new 21" iMac last week and it is just to slow to use. Before it used to take a couple of hours now its just way too long

    Hi
    As I understands it - This has nothing to do with Your iMac - Any Mac would take the same time.
    May be OS and support on the Window-PC platform handles this better.
    • .avi - is no specific codec (file format) but a container and the codec in this might not be one that iDVD can directly use (encode to .mpeg2 as on DVD disks)
    So either it just can't do it - or -
    iDVD has to back-encode to an usably codec - THIS IS WHAT I THINK HAS HAPPENED
    This back-encoding can take serious time - AND the final result usually is far from Good.
    I would
    • find out in what codec the .avi file is (I use QuickTime and in this inspector to read what codec .avi contains) (.mov is also a container)
    • import it into a program that can transcode to a better codec for iDVD - streamingDV or AIC (I GUESS)
    • then use this in iDVD
    Yours Bengt W

  • 2TB Time Capsule or External Hard Drive for use with Mac MINI and AppleTV

    Hi,
    My current setup is I have a 1TB Hard Drive linked to my intel Mac Mini via FireWire 400, the Mini shares my music and films through iTunes so that my AppleTV can pick them up.
    All devices are connected to an AEBS 802.11n (early model) via Cat6 Gigabit cables.
    As I have run out of space and am looking for a bigger drive, I wanted to know if I would be able to use the 2TB Time Capsule to hold my films and be able to stream them to the Mac Mini so that it may stream them through iTunes to the AppleTV.
    The theory of if should work, as the devices are all Gigabit capable and connected by high quality Cat6 leads their shouldn't be network bandwith issues, I am just unsure of how quickly the TimeCapsule can read stored data from a hard drive and transmit, some of my films are HD and run 4GB plus.
    The obvious answers is just to buy a bigger hard drive with FW400, however I would like to reduce the number of boxes I have under the TV, I plan to upgrade my AEBS to the latest one anyway so just thought it made sense to explore this option.
    looking forward to hearing what you have to say.

    Hello,
    It should work in theory, but the disk access time of the TC is much slower. I was setup like you are with an external drive connected to a Mini via FW and I had true Gigabit transfer between computers.
    When my hard drive failed I sold my Linksys gigabit router and bought a TC to reduce the number of boxes, but I soon learned that the read/write speed on a TC is a little bit faster than on a thumb drive! Not that great. All my machines are also connected with Cat6.
    It's still OK to watch a movie though, but transferring 10+ Gb is a pain.

  • Why is the Tick Count function slow when used with a .dll but fine with normal lab view code?

    when using the Tick Count millisecond timer with a .dll I've written in C, I'm getting some odd timing issues.
    When I code the function I want (I'll explain it below in case it helps) in LV and run it as a subVI, feeding it the Tick count as an argument, the function runs quickly, but not quite as quickly as I would like. When I feed this same subVI just an integer constant rather than the Tick Count, it takes about the same amount of time, maybe a tiny bit more on average.
    When I bring in my function from a .dll, however, I start to run into problems. When I feed my function an integer constant, it is much faster than my subVI written in LV. When I feel my .dll the Tick Count, however, it slows down tremendously. I'm including a table with the times below:
                 |  Clock   |   Constant   |
    SubVi:   | 450ms  |  465ms       |
    .dll         | 4900ms|  75ms         |
    This is running the function 100,000 times. The function basically shifts the contents of a 2-dimensional array one place. For this function, it probably won't be a huge deal for me, but I plan on moving some of my other code out of LV and into C to speed it up, so I'd really like to figure this out.
    Thanks,
    Aaron

    Hi Aaron,
    Thanks for posting the code -- that made things a lot clearer for me. I believe I know what's going on here, and the good news is that it's easy to correct! (You shouldn't apologize for this though, as even an experienced LabVIEW programmer could run into a similar situation.) Let me explain...
    When you set your Call Library Function Node to run in the UI Thread you're telling LabVIEW that your DLL is not Thread-safe -- this means that under no circumstances should the DLL be called from more than one place at a time. Since LabVIEW itself is inherently multithreaded the way to work with a "thread-unsafe" DLL is to run it in a dedicated thread -- in this case, the UI thread. This safety comes at a price, however, as your program will have to constantly thread-swap to call the DLL and then execute block diagram code. This thread-swapping can come with a performance hit, which is what you're seeing in your application.
    The reason your "MSTick fine behavior.vi" works is that it isn't swapping threads with each iteration of the for loop -- same with the "MSTick bad behavior.vi" without the Tick Count function. When you introduce the Tick Count Function in the for loop, LabVIEW now has to swap threads every single iteration -- this is where your performance issues originate. In fact, you could reproduce the same behavior with any function (not just TIck Count) or any DLL. You could even make your "MSTick fine behavior.vi" misbehave by placing a control property node in the for loop. (Property nodes are also executed in the UI thread).
    So what's the solution? If your DLL is thread-safe, configure the call library function node to be "reentrant." You should see a pretty drastic reduction in the amount of time it takes your code to execute. In general, you can tell if your DLL is thread-safe when:
    The code is thread safe when it does not store any global data, such as global variables, files on disk, and so on.
    The code is thread safe when it does not access any hardware. In other words, the code does not contain register-level programming.
    The code is thread safe when it does not make any calls to any functions, shared libraries, or drivers that are not thread safe.
    The code is thread safe when it uses semaphores or mutexes to protect access to global resources.
    The code is thread safe when it is called by only one non-reentrant VI.
    There are also a few documents on the website that you may want to take a look at, if you want some more details on this:
    Configuring the Call Library Function Node
    An Overview of Accessing DLLs or Shared Libraries from LabVIEW
    VI Execution Speed
    I hope this helps clear-up some confusion -- best of luck with your application!
    Charlie S.
    Visit ni.com/gettingstarted for step-by-step help in setting up your system

  • IMovie too slow when using with iPhoto videos

    Dear Geniuses
    I do have several videos into iPhoto, many of them ... and using iMovie to edit video is INCREDIBLY slow ...
    The only "solution" is to move the iPhoto videos into iMovie?
    Any ideas if iMovie 10 or 11 or 12 will be better at this?
    Is Aperture or Final Cut Pro X an alternative solution?
    tx in advance

    Hi Beppe,
    Your issue is related to Windows Embedded. Please post thread on the following forum for more effective response.
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=embeddedwindows.
    Thanks.
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • How can I establish an enum typedef for use with state machines and action engines?

    Hey all--
    I have an action engine with several instances.  Any time that I add a method to the engine, I have to modify all of the calling code to update the constant that determines the method being called.  There must be a smarter way to address this problem but my LV experience is insufficient to identify it.  Can any of you wiz-bangs tell me if it is possible to make a type def (I can do this) and use it with each instance of the action engine call so that changing any instance also updates the typedef?
    Thanks.

    Take your enumerator.  If it is not a control (ie constant), change it to a control.
    Under File Menu, select New > Custom Control.
    Move (or copy) your Enum Control to the Custom Control.  Change the Control to Strict Type Def (the selection to the right of the wrench).  Save it.
    (EDIT: ** OOps, the picture shows the wrong one.. sorry**)
    Copy that new Strict Type Def control to your code.
    See images below.
    OR.. If you're using LV8.x, and using a project, I would recomment that you do it from within your project explorer.  Simply insert a new "Control".  The rest of the steps are similar, except that you can insert it from your project. 
    R
    Message Edited by JoeLabView on 07-08-2008 06:47 PM
    Attachments:
    TypeDef.PNG ‏33 KB

  • Can i use one hardrive for time machine and other data?

    i want to buy an external drive for my macbook pro retina. i want to knwo if i were to buy an external hardrive big enought ot back up my 768 on my retina could i also put other media on it (like video and movie) without it overwriting or something like that

    screenfreak wrote:
    i want to buy an external drive for my macbook pro retina. i want to knwo if i were to buy an external hardrive big enought ot back up my 768 on my retina could i also put other media on it (like video and movie) without it overwriting or something like that
    Buy one hard drive for TimeMachine, large as possible for maximum amount of saved states, keep it connected more often so it updates more often to recover deleted files.
    Buy one hard drive the same size or slightly larger to clone your boot drive to it, it will be a hold option key bootable clone in case your boot drive fails to boot. Update it before doing anything major to your machine. Keep it disconnected in case of malware so it doesn't get infected or delete your files.
    Buy one hard drive for extra storage if your boot drive is getting full for instance.
    Buy one hard drive to backup the extra storage drive and treat it like the clone, make sure you have clean extra storage drive before connecting and updating it.
    Label and date each drive, your memory will fail you and you'll accidentally overwrite a drive.
    Keep your drives separate and in their respective purposes, in other words do not use partitions or use TimeMachine to backup other drives.
    Never use Filevault, it's cracked, it's worthless, impossible to recover data and you'll have to give up the password for repair or customs/searches anyway. Use a external hardware based encrypted drives and USB Iron Keys. This way your sensitive data is off the machine and can be used with another machine.
    Despite how many drives and backups, it's good to also make burned and labeled DVD's of your most important files like music for instance when you first get them. It's because sectors fail on hard drives and takes out your data and thus on all backups made afterwards. With burned DVD's it's permanent, unless you scratch it, melt it or loose it.
    Hardware also fails, more often than software because it's moved/abused while in operation.
    If you lose your TM drive, you ALSO lose what's on the other partitions on the drive or data that TM drive was backing up from other drives.
    Drives are cheap, data is not. Protect the data. Because it's a fortune trying to recover lost data off a dead drive.

  • New Mac on the way - Time Machine questions

    Hi there,
    My new Mac is now on its way from Apple and I just have a couple of questions regarding Time Machine:
    1. My new Mac is a MacBook Pro with retina display which is going to replace an early 2006 Intel iMac running Snow Leopard. I was hoping to use my latest Time Machine backup external hard disk to transfer the data using Setup Assistant as the USB port is the only common connection between the two Macs (other than WiFi which I suspect will be a bit slow when used with Setup Assistant). Will Time Machine use the lastest incremental backup to populate the new Mac, or will it only look to the last full backup (I am only looking to import my user settings, iTunes music and iPhotos)?
    2. Going forward, I'm trying to move to a more wireless setup. Previously my iMac used Time Machine on an external USB disk drive, however, I now want to use something like the Western Digital My Book Live connected to my wireless router via ethernet. From searching on the web, it seems this can be a bit hit and miss with both data transfer speed and reliability. I was therefore wondering if any of you guys have had any experience with using an external ethernet hard drive via a wireless router for use with Time Machine, and if so, whether you are able to recommend a particular model. My wireless router is a D-Link DSL-2740R which is ADSL2/2+ and 802.11n compatible.
    3. If I do go down the route of the external ethernet hard drive, would it be best to purchase the Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet cable for the initial backup, as I suspect the first full backup would take a while over WiFi.
    4. If there are issues with using a network drive, I guess the only other option is to use a Thunderbolt or USB 3.0 drive and then manually force Time Machine to back up when I am at home and can connect the drive (which could mean a while between backups). Unless anyone can offer any other solutions.
    Many thanks for any help you can offer. 
    Steve

    Use the Migration Assistant. Their are specific files not in the application folder that contain preferences and the like. The Migration Assistant will move over those preferences as well as the applications themselves. Plus it takes WAY less time.

  • SPA112 use with Call Manager

    We have used ATA 186 devices with our Call Manager system for use with fax machines and analog phones in a manufacturing environment.  I am hopeful that the SPA112 can be used as a lower cost alternative to the older ATAs.  
    I have searched for basic configuration information for use with Call Manager but haven't come across anything. 
    Can these devices be used with Call Manager and is there basic information available on how to configure them?
    Thanks.

    The SPA112 is essentially the same as the Linksys PAP2t adapter.
    They both use SIP protocol, and can be added to Callmanager, but I don't think the SPA112 is supported in this configuration.
    I was able to get the SPA112 to work with CallManager by adding it as an Advanced SIP device.  That uses more licenses (6 I think).
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2082101
    That details getting a Linksys PAP2 device working with CallManager 7.1
    I got SPA112's working by using the info in that link.  You have to set it all up manually, but it does work.

  • How do I set up time capsule to just backup multiple macs on a wireless network without using the TC in the bridge mode?

    I have an AT&T modem that serves as our home wireless network.  I wanted to backup up our computer data so I got a time capsule to back up our three household MACs.  After purchase, I found how that I needed to put the exising modem in "bridge mode" so the Time capsule would establish the network. Four frustrating hours later talking to 3 different people at Yahoo, I got the **** thing established.  It worked fine for 4 months - then a power failure forced me to repeat the process again.  I had to reestablish everything and it took another 4 hours.  After 6 months, another power failure forced me to go through the entire process again.  Now, of course, Yahoo is charging a fee to help you establish the TC as the network if you have one of their modems - and to make things interesting, they really don't understand MACs.  After 5 hours, in frustration, I gave up and asked the Yahoo folks to just put their modem back in as the network hub and I unplugged the Time Capsule.  Now after 3 months of looking at an expensive Time Capsule and searching the internet for help, I figured I try the Apple help network,
    I just want to backup the data on my MACS.  I have a network in the house that works just fine.  How do I configure the TC to work as a backup on a wireless network?  It seems like it should be simple, but it isn't.  Can anybody help?

    I have no idea about the modem and bridge mode (I don't do networking -- hopefully Bob Timmons, Tesserax, or one of the other networking gurus will drop in and address that).
    But . . . you should be able to back up to the TC as long as it's on your network and recognized by your Macs.  I think being in bridge mode means it will be rather slow, but it should work.  Until/unless we hear otherwise, you might want to see #Q1 in Using Time Machine with a Time Capsule.

  • I just purchased Time Capsule today.  I ONLY want to use it as an external drive.  I do not need it for Time Machine. I can see the TC in my finder, but when I click on a file or video to drag and drop, I get message that TC can't be modified. Help please

    I just purchased Time Capsule today.  I ONLY want to use it as an external drive.  I do not need it for Time Machine. I need to free up room on my computer. As of now, I can't even load updates. I can see the TC in my finder, but when I click on a file or video to drag and drop, I get message that TC can't be modified. Help please!

    I agree with Kappy.. passing files and especially via wireless is slow as slow.
    Just need to be sure your TC is the new AC model??
    And the OS on the computer is Lion?
    Have you completed the setup of the TC via the utility? You do still need to get internet via the TC so it has to be plugged into the main router..
    Give us the full picture of the network.
    Then we can help you get into it.. whether you should put your files on it is another question.

  • Just installed new Time Capsule, wifi now very slow, what amI doing wrong?

    Just installed new Time Capsule, wifi now very slow, what am I doing wrong?

    It's possible the reason it seems so slow, is that a backup might be in progress - and since it's the first backup everything on the disk is something that Time Machine is backing up and is being transferred across the WiFi at the same time as you're trying to use your Internet. So you're competing with Time Machine data flying across your WiFi along with your internet stuff. So if this is indeed what is happening (look at Time Machine to see if a backup is in progress), either pause the backup to a more convienent time or live with the slowness till the backup is done this first time, and after that you probably will not notice the "competition" on your WiFi. I like to schedule the Time Machine backups to late at night rather than once an hour (the default), but that schedule should be whatever you feel most comfortable with.
    There is a handy free utility called "TimeMachine Editor" that you can get from http://timesoftware.free.fr/timemachineeditor/ that lets you create your own customized backup schedule. You can create several schedules to fit your working conditions. I've used it for several years with never a problem. I don't have anything to do with the company - just a happy user.
    Good luck...

  • Can i use the time capsule as just an external hard drive for music or does it have to be used soley as a backe up?? im thinking for music and photos

    Can I use the time capsule as just an external hard drive for music or does it have to be used soley as a back up?  I'm thinking for music and photos

    Nickles96 wrote:
    Hello friends.. I have a similar question, in that I would like to purchase the 2TB TC for use as a NAS device, in addition to taking advantage of the Air Port extreme.. Then I could dump my Linksys router.
    I was originally looking at a Synology NAS solution, but the TC seems like it can meet my needs.
    I have a Synology NAS as well as the Time Capsule.  If you look at the 3.2 beta program, the Synology actually attempts to replicate TC functionality in that you can use it with Time Machine on your Mac.
    I must say, Airport on the TC is definitely a nice feature!
    Nickles96 wrote:
    In addition to the obvious feature of the backup, can I indeed also use the TC as a NAS drive to access from remote locations (example from the office)?
    I'm surprised more people aren't using the TC as a dedicated NAS deviced.. I've searched high and low on forums around the web, and don't seem to see many people trying to use it as I've outlined.
    I can't see why this wouldn't fufill my needs, and take the place of a separate NAS solution (like the Synology, or iOmega, Seagate, etc....)
    Has anyone used this TC as such?
    Yes, you can do this and it's something I've been trying to do, but I'm currently having issues.  I have another thread stating I consistently get "connection failed" messages.  I'm basically storing my music/photo/video files on the TC and keeping my Mac hard drive fairly lean.  In terms of NAS functionality, the TC is very basic.  Synology/QNAP and others have a lot more features so don't rule them out.

  • My 1st Generation time capsule won't connect to the internet thru a new motorola sb6121 - get continuously flashing yellow light. Using a router in between the modem and capsule yields good but slower connection to internet. Any thoughts?

    My 1st Generation time capsule won't connect to the internet thru a new motorola sb6121 - get continuously flashing yellow light. Using a router in between the modem and capsule yields good but slower connection to internet. Any thoughts?

    Thanks for your response
    Let me give the history - I started with an Apple Express being fed thru a D-Link  EBTR 2310 cable Router from an RCA DCM315 Modem (Pure). Comcast service all the way.
    Got the 1st generation TC in 2008 and merely replaced the Airport Express with the TC. Worked ok
    A year or two ago I did try removing the modem and feeding the TC directly from the modem. Resulted in the same condition I have now - Continuous flashing amber on the TC. So I put the router back in the chain.
    Some time later, at the recommendation of a Comcast rep, I replaced the router with (a Belkin F5D 5231) to see if speed and dropout problems would be improved. I thought it helped some at the time but now I am not so sure.
    Last week I decided to see if a new modem would help with download speeds. So I got another pure cable modem (Motorola SB 6121- high on the Comcast recommended list).
    Got up and running easily with Comcast help and with the modem connected directly to a computer.
    Next I put the TC in the link and again could not get past the TC continuing to flash amber. Although I did get connected to the internet with this configuration I lost connection two both of my printers - one connected by USB and the other wirelessly to the TC. Again everything works fine when I put the Belkin router back in the system.
    However with the router in there, the modem shows the downstream connection to be 10/100 ethernet speed. (Modem light changes color for indicating speeds.}
    I have gone thru all of the combinations of powering down/ up, but all stays the same.
    I can live with what I have but something still doesn’t seem right.
    Thanks again

  • Using Time Capsule as just a backup. (Need Help)

    There are two Time Capsules in our home.  We use one with our modem for our home Wi-Fi.  The one that I have on my desk, I would like to just use it as a back.  Does anyone have any idea as to how I can set it up to my iMac for just a back up?

    Yes, it is relatively easy.
    How is the imac connecting to the internet now??
    The answer depends on this..
    Ethernet.
    if you use ethernet, then could not be simpler.. bridge the TC.. plug the ethernet that was in the imac into the TC.. and plug the imac into another port on the TC.. it is now a switch and AP.. so turn off wireless.. and use it as your TM destination.
    Wireless.
    If the imac get internet by wireless.. setup the TC as router might be easier than bridge.. either are possible though. Plug it by ethernet into the computer. You might need to turn off wireless just to finish the setup. You need to move the TC to a different IP range. ie if you have two TC the second one cannot be the same IP as the first. Bridge avoids this issue as used above. Set the ethernet ip of the TC to say 192.168.1.1 .. set the ethernet on the computer to 192.168.1.10 with 255.255.255.0 subnet.. no router no dns set. (This is assuming the main TC is not using the same IP range). You may have to turn off the various errors that the TC will come up with.. just ignore them.. the TC is now isolated from the network for your exclusive use.
    There are other methods.. like using wireless extend.. so ask more if you need more.

Maybe you are looking for