Time Consumption more in T5220 Hardware than N440 Hardware.Why?

Hi,
I have an issue related to T5220 Hardware machine.
Same solaris is installed in T5220 and N440 machine.
Same application is running in T5220 and N440 machine.
Same operation is performed in T5220 and N440 machine.
The operation is getting the contents from the Database and writing in XML file.
The XML file size will be around 85MB.
Both the operation are scheduled using Java code at night 23:00 hrs.
In N440 machine, the operation takes 15 mins.
In T5220 machine, the operation takes more than 1 hour.Some times it even takes 2 hours.
Could anyone help me out in this issue?
Atleast suggest some ideas.I am clueless on this..
Help is very much needed..
Thanks in advance.
Srinivasan.

Quote
This is for MSI engineers
then this is the wrong place as this is a Users-to-Users Forum. >>How to contact MSI.<<

Similar Messages

Java program consumes far more ram on linux than on windows - why ?

Hello dudes,
i encountered a problem and i dont know how to solve it. i've a java application that consists of several classes and 3 threads. it consumes about 7 mb on win2k but up tp 100 mb on SuSE Linux and shows up 13 threads.
is this something wrong with java or with linux? have any of you guys already faced the same problem and solved it ?
thanks for any replies.

Be careful. The Linux ps command by default shows the individual threads of a Java program as separate processes when they are in fact not. The fact you have 13 threads is normal, most are for housekeeping and appear on Windows as well.
I can't speak to the total memory utilization, but make sure you aren't adding up the memory of each of the 13 lightweight processes (threads) and counting the same memory usage 13 times.
Chuck

My iphone has more songs and playlists than my computer, why aren't they the same

Why won't all songs and playlists from iphone sync with computer?

Charles,
I get a message that i have purchased songs on my iPhone that I should transfer to my playlist before I upgrade the software. Do you know how to do this?

I have an iMac mid 2010. After Disk utilities said the drive was corrupt, I ran the hardware test (extended) 3 times. No problems. I than ran Disk utility again and got 2 messages in red-keys out of order, and --Volume corrupt, can't be repaired. I tried

I have an iMac mid 2010. After Disk utilities said the drive was corrupt, I ran the hardware test (extended) 3 times. No problems. I than ran Disk utility again and got 2 messages in red…keys out of order, and ……Volume corrupt, can't be repaired.
I tried to do a system install, but message said…disk can't be changed. Will a complete erase and install fix this ?
Everything is backed-up.

There's hardware and software.
Your drive could physically be in good condition but something has caused the file structure to be messed up (it just happens sometimes). The directory that keep track of files is corrupt. Disk Utility can help determine if that is the issue. In some cases it can repair the problem but it cannot do it to a drive that is being used to boot the system while you are doing that. You have to boot from another drive. Some things DU cannot repair and you need to try a stronger utility such as Diskwarrior.
A failing hard drive (one with mechanical issues) can be a cause of file structure issues but this is by no means always the case. Apart from looking at the SMART diagnosis feature of Disk Utility (and smart isn't totally reliable) there often isn't a way to tell if a drive is failing until it suddenly happens, which is why you need to maintain backups.
In your situation it does sound serious and not just minor directory corruption. You can try erasing (formatting) the drive, You may need to do this if it is really corrupt, in which case there could be underlying physical issues. I use old technology but if you have the patience you can try erasing the drive with the security option of writing zeros once (don't do more unless you are going on a 3 week vacation). This makes the drive not simply assume everything is okay by forcing it try every part of the drive by writing data. If something is gong wrong you may find it marks a lot of bad sectors, or flat out refuses to format. Then you know you need a new drive.

Time out (more than 24 hours) deleting master data.

We are trying to delete the 0CUST_SALES = ´000000000#´ but we are not able to do it because if we delete and try to save in rsa1>infoobject->choose the characteristic->'master data maintenance', there will be a time out error. We tried than using the program RSDMD_DEL_BACKGROUND but it would take more than
72 hours and we wouldnt be able to do any load for the cubes that contains the 0CUST_SALES. And also there is several aggregates with 0CUST_SALES
Do you know any other way around to delete this 0CUST_SALES = ´000000000#´?
Look forward for a suggestion....
Rubens

Hi Rubens:
Do you want to delete only that record (0000000#) from 0CUST_SALES.iF SO, GO TO rsdmd and select that record and delete. if t doesnt work you might want to try SE14. Bu please be advised that, when you this Tcode spl care shd be taken as you will be wiping everything from the tables.
Assign points if helpful
kalyan

Can you face time with more than one person at one time?

Can you face time with more than one person at one time?

You mean like a conference call? No, unfortunately.

Is it possible to Face Time with more than one person?

All of my grandchildren posess iiPads, and I regularly Face Time with them---individually. Is it possible to Face Time with more than one person?

Not at present-no.

I turn off my whats app lasseen time stamp more than 24 hours ago and now i can't turn it on it sees " could not connect to whats app services please try again latter" i try deleting the app and changing the calendar and still didnt worrk

I turn off my whats app lasseen time stamp more than 24 hours ago and now i can't turn it on it sees " could not connect to whats app services please try again latter" i try deleting the app and changing the calendar and still didnt worrk

Ok - an update ...
Managed to get the phone to backup to iCloud, so decided to risk the "Factory" reset.
Took the reset option including delete all data and crossed fingers.
It took a while to resotre from iCloud, but everthing seems to be back and ...
Bluetooth now working agaim.
Backup to Computer working again.
And somewhat to my surprise, GMail in the mail app is working again. (The surprise being that the implication of other posts was that this was a 6.1.3 fundamental bug)
Still no idea why the iPhone was corrupted - but at least the "Factory" reset seems to have recovered the situation.

Why my system is taking 4 times or more to render and export? SOS

HAve the latest system installed in the church for video editing. However, for a 30 mins project it takes 4 times or sometimes more to render and export. We are helpless. The following is the system configuration:
OS                    Windows 8.1 Pro 64 bit (6.3, Build 9600)
Software           Adobe Pro CC
Processor          AMD FX(tm) - 8320 Eight Core Processor, 3.50 GHz
RAM                    16 GB
System type          64-bit Operating system, x64-based processor
Graphics Card          AMD RAdeon HD 6670
MotherBoard     ASUS

I'm having the same problems.
I believe I have the answer.
Everything was fine until I upgraded to CC.
I built a box to specifically run Adobe products except the video card.
I have an i7 chip,16 R, 2T, Windows 8.1, 64 bit and AMD Radeon HD 6670 (unapproved video card)
I run a clean box. No 3rd party anything. No add-on apps.
No hardware changes.
Heres My Current Project: 45 JPG images - one audio track MP3
A 3 minute clip of still images takes 30 minutes to render.
And then nearly 30 minutes to export as an MP4.
It use to run blazingly fast.
I built this new box with an i7 to speed up the processing time as my previous system hardware had become outdated.
Once I built the new system and installed CS6 the Premiere CS6 rendering time was less than 3 minutes for a 3 minute clip.
Nice. Happy Face.
Since I upgraded from CS6 to the CC version my Premiere CC performance disappeared.
How can this be? I've used Premiere for years.
I explained to support how blazing fast my system ran until recently. One of the tech support persons told me it was a fluke that my system ran so fast. He came to the conclusion that based on with my hardware CC should not have run that fast. And now my slow rendering time is back to where it should be based on my hardware, slow. I was trying to contain my enthusiam knowing I was back to...slow! You know, I'm really patient but after 3 hours on the phone I was transferred to the Photoshop Department. Why? Because the images in my project were most likely corrupted. The very images that were originally imported into PS CC from my iPhone which as one my know... iPhone images on a PC are upside down. I did a 180 on 45 images and re-saved them with new file names as JPG's.
It was determined that I had to do a batch renaming of all the jpg images and re-attach them in Premiere CC.
So we parted ways and I hung up the phone.
This is now my problem. Ok. Fine. It's now determined that I have an unsupported AMD video card. Ok. Fine.
After an hour on Google searching for a new (low end) $500.00 video card the solution came to me!
I'm thinking, we've both this all backwards.
Here's my serious suggestion:
I think you (Adobe) should offer a "Box of Clouds" based on all of your hardware specifications.
(Cue chorus of the song, "Come Together" by The Beatles... )
Sell and/or Lease to me the entire product - the supported hardware with pre-installed software! (No 3rd Parth Vendors)
I'll never have to hear or worry about my CPU, GPU, CUDA, MPE, 6670, SSE, TD, HD, AMD, ATI or INVIDIA ever again.
This will make my GIGA Hurts feel better and all of us can get back to work!
Problems solved!
Please send me an Adobe Box with Clouds and I'll be on Cloud 9!
I Think It Is Genius!
Ok...back to work...

It doesn't seem to be as sharp as it is in the "Develop" mode. This seems to occur more with wide angle than macro. Any suggestions would be extremely welcome...Norm

Here's my problem: (Lightroom 4) I will edit a photo in "Develop" to the point where it looks great and I'm satisfied with the results. Then I click back to "Library" and the photo seems to go a little out of focus. When I export the photo, it doesn't seem to be as sharp as it is in "Develop" mode. This seems to occur more with wide angle than macro. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Norm

Okay guys, some good news!
First of all, thanks again to Sean for his suggestion to look inside the transaction log!
Indeed that specific table that I noticed was filling the transaction log, is the largest table in my database. Its size stands at about ~65GB. Like I said earlier, it has no LOB or Overflow columns. But one interesting fact about it is - it had absolutely
no indexes! It was a heap, but it was also partitioned. I didn't know a case like this could cause such problems with shrink? It's weird but it also kinda makes sense in a way.
Anyways, I ran a script to create a partitioned clustered index on that table. That took pretty much all day long due to the table size (almost 7 hours). But once that was finished, shrinking the data file was a breeze!
At least... Until the shrink started "hanging" again because now it started dealing with my
second largest table (~55GB). Like the first one, this one is also a partitioned
heap without any indexes. So I expected this to happen. I guess the solution this time will be the same: Create a clustered index.
Does this make sense to you? A partitioned heap table causing such heavy workload to SHRINK, but when it's moved to a clustered index, suddenly it flies?
Eitan Blumin; SQL Server Consultant - Madeira SQL Server Services

Burners that are more "aggressive" reading less than perfect discs

Has anyone had experience with having to duplicate and work with originals provided by clients that are hard for the dvd drives to recognize properly when you try to make copies? I'm talking about non copy protected - industrials provided to me from varied dvd burners "in the field". Mostly different construction related specialty work. These dvd "masters" are created by feeding a camera's output to a consumer dvd/vhs combo recorder. Most of the dvd's I get are fine, but occasionally my drives "choke" on the originals. The discs are clean (no scratches) and the brand of blank does not seem to matter. I have purchased software that is supposed to have superior error correction properties and it doesn't really help.
I'm thinking that folks in this forum might have experience with hardware solutions that might help this situation.
TIA,
Pete D

Pete,
It used to happen more in the past than it does now, but this just happened to me last week. A client broat over a DVD which would not read in all 3 of my Macs no matter what drive I used. It also only played in 2 of my multiple set top players. It eventually played and mounted in my "home" PC of all things. Having a few different brand drives ready to read the discs and a few extra computers around helps.
Rikk

Time consumption for certificate verification

Hello everyone,
I tried to track the time consumption for certificate verification. I generated the certificate by myself using X509V1CertificateGenerator in org.bouncycastle.asn1.x509. The signature algorithm is "SHA1withRSA". I generated two different certificates using different public exponent and tracked the time for certificate verification respectively. The first time, the public exponent I used to generate a certificate is 3; the second time, the public exponent I used to generate a certificate is 65537.
In theory, the operation for signature verification is C=M^e(mod n), in another word, the time consumption should depend on the length of e. More specifically, Time complexity of C=M^e(mod n) should be linear with the length of exponent e, under the same n.
The method I used for tracking the time is:
//record the time before verification
long time1 = (new Date()).getTime();
//certificate verification
aCert.verify(publickey)/*Here, 'aCert' is a certificate to be verified. 'publickey' is a public key which I retrieved from an already trusted certificate, and in this case, the first time, e=3, the second time, e=65537.*/
//record the time after verification
long time2 = (new Date()).getTime();
//the time consumption is:
long period = time2 - time1;But, after I execute using different public exponent 3 and 65537, the time consumption is almost the same, not as it supposed to be.(in theory, due to the different length of 3 and 65537 in binary form(one is 2-bit, the other is 17-bit), the time consumtion should be 17/2 times different). Actualy, in my case, the time for verification using e=3 is 551 ms; and the time for e=65537 is 531 ms.
I am just wondering, how to explain this bizarre thing?
Any help is every welcome! Thanks a lot.

You can check the source code of the oddModPow() method in java/math/BigInteger.java (check src.zip). There are some optimizations in it, so try to verify if they can make the running time of the case "exponent = 3" nearly equal to the case "exponent = 65537". In the first case, 3 = 11 in binary (two bits 1); in the second case, 65537 = 10000000000000001 in binary (two bits 1 as well). Maybe it can be a hint for you.

High time consumption and CPU utilization on EPM 11.1.2.1

We are using a distributed environment for EPM system 11.1.2.0, in which, on system A, Foundation services and Planning have been installed and on system B, Essbase, Admin Services and Provider Services have been installed.
The configuration for the two systems is as mentioned below :
System A:
intel Xenon CPU X7560 2.27 GHz (dual core)
12 GB RAM
System B:
intel Xenon CPU X7560 2.27 GHz (dual core)
8 GB RAM
A business rule takes 15 minutes on being executed on version 9.3.1; whereas the time consumed on system 11.1.2.1 varies from 3 hours (mostly) to 10 minutes.
This business rule aggregates 5 dimensions (1 dense and 4 sparse). It does not create any new blocks and intelligent calc is also set to off.
Although the cache and memory values on the newer system are higher than the previous version, we fail to reduce the time consumption and CPU utilization. Please help us resolve this issue.

Your issues is beyond the scope of a forum. I suggest you find an infrastructure person who has Essbase experience. Your machines also have less resources than the standard deployment guide recommends.
This would appear to either be lack of physical memory or an issue with the IO speed of the disk subsystem which you are storing your Essbase data on.
Regards,
John A. Booth
http://www.metavero.com

Is there a way to show two angles at the same time in the final edit rather than switch between them with Multicam?

Can I show two angles at the same time in the final edit rather than alternate with Multicam?

Stack two clips on top of each other and reduce the sizes. I think that's what you want.

In time Consumption of Raw material in case of Subcontracting

HI Gurus
Please look into the following issue.
Presently we are sending Raw material to subcontracting vendor through 541 mvt type along with excis challan.Then subcontractor intimates raw material consumption details time to time through mail/fax.Now as per client requirement raw material consumption should be done in time i.e. when they are receiving raw material consumption details. They don't want book the raw material consumtion at the the time of receipt of finish goods.
Please guide me to book in time consumption of raw material.
Redards
Kumar

Thnks for your reply.
I want to do the manual consumption from subcontracting stock. Client don't want to book the consumption at the the time of raw material transfer to subcontractor. Also there will be problem in subcontracting challan reconcillation.
We can't do the manual consumption through 543 mvt type .Is there any workarround for this ?

Time Consumption more in T5220 Hardware than N440 Hardware.Why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for