Time is taking more than usual in running a report???

hello expert,
i have a report who run successfully in a usually normal time, but from few day it is taking more time than usual.
i did not made any changes in code, every thing is same.
please suggest me to tune report performance??
thanks
yash

i did not made any changes in codeMaybe you didn't change anything, but what about somebody else?
What about changes in the database?

Similar Messages

TOC with Multiple TR's is taking more than 24 hours of time to release ?

Hi All,
TOC with Multiple TR's When Released is taking huge amount of time to release , more than 24hours,
what needs to be done ,
when checked the Log of the particular   TR in SE01 Getting the following
Export phase="Export        21.02.2010 10:27:53 In process: Requires update"
Pre-Export phase = "Pre-Export Methods 21.02.2010 21:11:24    (4) Ended with Warning"
Also when checked the      ps -ef | grep R3trans
Getting The following,
qeaadm 573554 704738 73 19:37:14      - 323:48 R3trans -w /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAE900159.QEA /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAKK900159.QEA
qeaadm 626828 688170 72 10:27:58      - 582:15 R3trans -w /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAE900166.QEA /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAKK900166.QEA
How to stop this ?
And why it is taking such a huge time ?
How to tackle this problem ?

Also Observe
When I check ps -ef | grep R3trans am getting the following output
qeaadm 573554 704738 64 19:37:14 - 455:08 R3trans -w /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAE900159.QEA /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAKK900159.QEA
qeaadm 626828 688170 64 Feb 21 - 721:00 R3trans -w /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAE900166.QEA /usr/sap/trans/tmp/QEAKK900166.QEA
Check the bold letter 455 and 721 Whether these mention the hours since the R3trans is active ?

HT201274 My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON

My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON ?

I'm having this EXACT same problem with my iPhone 4, and I have the same computer stats (I have a Samsung Series 7)

Since I upgraded to Adobe Created Cloud, my photo editing processes are taking more than 10 times longer than they used to. Why would this be?

Since I upgraded to Adobe Created Cloud, my photo editing processes are taking more than 10 times longer than they used to. Why would this be?

You will likely get better program help in a program forum
The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

Sync and Create project operation from DTR is taking more than one hour

Hi All.
Recently basis team has implemented the track for ESS/MSS application.So When we import the track to NWDS its showing 500 Dcs.
I have successfully done the Sync and create project operation from DTR for 150 DCS and its take 5 min per Dcs.
However after that when i am trying to sync Dc or create project DC from DTR the operation is taking more than 3 hour per DC.Which should not be the case because for rest 150 DC that i ahve done Sync operation adn Create project operation from DTR it hardly takes 5 min per Dc.As this operataion is taking so much time finally i have close the NWDS to stop this operation.
I am using NWDS 2.0.15 and EP7.0 portal SP15 and NWDI is 7.0
Can any body tell how to solve this issue so that i can Sync and Create project from DTR for a DC within 5 min?
Thanks
Susmita

Hi Susmita,
If the DCs are fine in CBS build, then I feel there is no need to test all of them locally in NWDS.
You can verify some certain applications in these DCs, then you sync & create project for these DCs & test run these applications.
As I get you only need to check ( no changes will be done ), yes you can verify them in small groups (say 20-25 DCs/group) in different workspaces so that no workspace is overloaded.
But why do you want to keep a copy of them locally as you are not making any changes, you can Unsync & Remove these projects once verified & use the same workspace to work on the next set of DCs.
Hope this clarifies your concerns.
Kind Regards,
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Jain on Apr 23, 2009 1:55 PM

Satellite L735 taking longer than usual to start-up

My toshiba Satellite L735 was taking longer than usual to startup (more than a minute, usually takes 40 secs) gave it to the service centre, they said they updates the BIOS, optimised processor calculation, formatted it.
It was fine again, but the problem was back in less than a month, took it again, the person at the counter just reduced the unnecessary programs from the boot list, came back home to notice it was taking even longer to startup (more than 2 mins).
When i switch it on, its all fine i get the windows logo in no time, but after that a black screen appears and stays for about a minute and a half, then the homescreen appears, the windows startup sound thats supposed to play as soon as the homescreen appears plays about 40 secs aftr the homescreen has appeared.
Please help.
Thank you.

Hi
The notebook seems to load the windows slowly because too many processes would be loaded at the beginning.
First of all I recommend downloading and installing the CCLeaner. This freeware tool would help you to clean the registry and to remove the garbage from the system.
Furthermore you should check your processes which would be loaded at the beginning.
Start msconfig and go to StartUp tab. Here you can disable no necessary and not important processes.
I dont know how many computer experience you have so be careful with that.
If you dont know exactly what the single process does, google for more details.
Removing a mark near the process will disable this you can enable this later too
Furthermore I would recommend checking your antivirus software I switched from Norton Antivirus to Avira Antivir software because it much faster and does not need a lot of hardware resources the Avira antivir is freeware software so you can install and use it for free.
Last but not least defragment the HDD to ensure faster data access
Good luck

Data Load taking more than 24 hrs

Hi All,
We are in the process of loading the data from R3 to BW. Its taking more than 24hrs to load 1 yr data. This is because of complexity of ABAP code its taking this much time. We did all the possible ways to improve the performance of the code. But no luck.
In case if the same thing happened in the production system, then how should I forward with the data load as its taking more than 24 hrs for 1 yr data.
I m Planning to load int with out data transfer 1st and then Full load.
Please correct if I m wrong.
Thanks,
RS.

Hi,
where is your ABAP code complexity loacted? in R/3 or in BW?
Are you talking about loading in empty cube taking long time? extraction time?
Analyze the different steps in your monitor and tell us where is the bottleneck;
If you already know the above and you have performed all the tunings (e.g. number range buffereing when filling an empty cube...) then you're correct; init without data and then full loads.
As suggested you could segment your full loads and even run them in paralel...
hope this helps...
Olivier.

Startup is starting to lag more than usual

Startup is taking longing than usual, I have checked the startup folder but that doesn't seem to be the cause

Yes PC performance degrades over time. The steps I take to keep mine running well include keeping the startup routine lean....turn off unneeded programs that start automatically with Windows, Also I routinely run CCleaner and clean out the old junk files and also run the registry cleaner, and also run Defraggler (CCleaner and Defraggler come from piriform.com). Also I refuse to run the mainstream antivirus programs, because I still believe they take too big of a bite out of performance. I now include AVG in that. I prefer to run Avast! or Avira because I believe they are much lighter. I set my browser to destroy history and all cached data when I exit. I run Malwarebytes Antimalware about every other week, too.

Problems with failover which is taking more than 5 min

Hi,
I'm new to Weblogic world and facing some problems in failover.
I have plugin configuration as below.
In the httpd.conf file
# Configure Performance settings
Timeout 45
ListenBacklog 1000
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 0
KeepAliveTimeout 15
<IfModule mpm_winnt.c>
ThreadLimit 500
ServerLimit 6
StartServers 2
MaxClients 3000
MinSpareThreads 500
MaxSpareThreads 3000
ThreadsPerChild 500
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
</IfModule>
# EnableMMAP off
# EnableSendfile off
# Configure DoS Settings
# Max Body size in HTTP Request of 100Mb
# Max HTTP headers set to 50
# Max HTTP header size to 8Kb
LimitRequestLine 8190
LimitRequestFields 50
LimitRequestFieldSize 8096
LimitRequestBody 104857600
RLimitCPU 300 300
RLimitMem 8192000 8192000
#RLimitNPROC 20 20
# EnableMMAP off
# EnableSendfile off
this Configuration is in Weblogic plugin as we have seperate the configuration and included this in the httpd.conf
<IfModule mod_weblogic.c>
WebLogicCluster ********************************
KeepAliveEnabled ON
KeepAliveSecs 30
CookieName PSJSESSION_ID
DebugConfigInfo ON
WLIOTimeoutSecs 4000
# Debug ALL
# WLLogFile /u01/PWCapache/logs/staging-orbit-emea.pwcinternal.com/wlproxy_http.log
</IfModule>
Asuming 01 & 02
We stopped one side of the weblogic server(01) and tried the failovering, requests are going to the 02 side absolutely fine but still the plugin is sending the requests to the 01 side and its taking more than 5 min to route to available (02 which is up).
My thoughts are to reduce the WLIOTimeoutSecs 4000 to 300 value... and introduce DynamicServerList value(at the moment this value is not set not sure how the apache behaves if this value is not set any suggestion on this pls?)
as well as to introduce ConnectTimeoutSecs (10)& ConnectRetrySecs(2)
Could somebody please point to the solution for this?
Edited by: user2659864 on 14-Dec-2010 01:55

Hi,
If you are completely shutting down the server-01 then once the server-02 sends the response back to the proxy then it would have the fresh list of which servers are running properly, hence if still the proxy is sending the request to the server-01 then this mean that the Apache process have not shared the dynamic server list with the other process or it seems to be a bug in the WLS plugin.
Suggestion try to use the latest WLS plugin and see if you can solve this issue as most of the time it would not be a an issue with WLS plugin.
And if you are suspending the server-01 then the below link would give you a better idea on it as how things works.
Topic: 404 error with Apache and Suspended Weblogic managed server
http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=4567
Secondly by default the value of "WLIOTimeoutSecs " is 300 seconds so if you don't give this value then it would take 300 seconds which goes with "Idempotent" value which is by default "on", hence if the server is not able to send the response then it would fail over the second server after waiting 300 sec . Thus if you decrease the value of "WLIOTimeoutSecs " it would help you in case. More information can be seen below.
Topic: General Parameters for Web Server Plug-Ins
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/plugins/plugin_params.html#wp1143055
Hope that would answer all your questions :)
Regards,
Ravish Mody
http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/
Come, Join Us and Experience The Magic…

Macbook 2011 Model Hangs more than usual....?

I have a Macbook ( 2011 Model ) that's hanging longer and more than usual. This just started yesterday, and I've ran a virus scan ( which can back clean ), and clean my mac clean up on my cache. That seemed to help for a while, but I notice after my mac run a few applications it slows down, and take a long time to process anything. I can use some help.

The most common issues are memory and free sisk space....so how much memory do you hve, and how much free disk space do you have?

IPhone 4 battery draining more than usual? Maybe because of 6.1.3?

Hey, I have noticed that ever since I have updated to my iPhone 4 to iOS 6.1.3 the battery has drained more than usual. My battery drains about 1% per minute. Sometimes it drains even when I'm not using the phone? Is there any solution to fix this problem? I would REALLY appreciate it!

The battery drains on every phone when not being actively used. There are processes going on in the background such as an email account or accounts being checked for new messages depending on your Fetch setting for email. Depending on the cellular reception at the time, more battery will be used when reception is lower regardless if any calls are being placed or received. If you have any push notifications enabled, those are being received. when not actively using the phone.
Have you changed anything such as screen brightness?
Are you accessing an Exchange account with your iPhone?
Any change after powering the iPhone off and on and/or after a reset which is similar to a computer restart?

Can there be more than one JVM Running on the same machine

Can there be more than one JVM Running on the same machine.

Even JVM's of different versions (or vendors) can run on the same box at the same time.

Query taking more than 1/2 hour for 80 million rows in fact table

Hi All,
I am stuck in this query as it it taking more than 35 mins to execute for 80 million rows. My SLA is less than 30 mins for 160 million rows i.e. double the number.
Below is the query and the Execution Plan.
SELECT txn_id AS txn_id,
acntng_entry_src AS txn_src,
f.hrarchy_dmn_id AS hrarchy_dmn_id,
f.prduct_dmn_id AS prduct_dmn_id,
f.pstng_crncy_id AS pstng_crncy_id,
f.acntng_entry_typ AS acntng_entry_typ,
MIN (d.date_value) AS min_val_dt,
GREATEST (MAX (d.date_value),
LEAST ('07-Feb-2009', d.fin_year_end_dt))
AS max_val_dt
FROM Position_Fact f, Date_Dimension d
WHERE f.val_dt_dmn_id = d.date_dmn_id
GROUP BY txn_id,
acntng_entry_src,
f.hrarchy_dmn_id,
f.prduct_dmn_id,
f.pstng_crncy_id,
f.acntng_entry_typ,
d.fin_year_end_dt
Execution Plan is as:
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 914,089 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
                                                                                9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE Date_Dimension Cost: 29 Bytes: 94,960 Cardinality: 4,748
                                                                                10 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE Position_Fact Cost: 913,693 Bytes: 2,157,187,592 Cardinality: 77,042,414
Kindly suggest, how to make it faster.
Regards,
Sid

The above is just a part of the query that is taking the maximum time.
Kindly find the entire query and the plan as follows:
WITH MIN_MX_DT
AS
( SELECT
TXN_ID AS TXN_ID,
ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC AS TXN_SRC,
F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID AS HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID AS PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID AS PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
MIN (D.DATE_VALUE) AS MIN_VAL_DT,
GREATEST (MAX (D.DATE_VALUE), LEAST (:B1, D.FIN_YEAR_END_DT))
AS MAX_VAL_DT
FROM
proj_PSTNG_FCT F, proj_DATE_DMN D
WHERE
F.VAL_DT_DMN_ID = D.DATE_DMN_ID
GROUP BY
TXN_ID,
ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC,
F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
D.FIN_YEAR_END_DT),
SLCT_RCRDS
AS (
SELECT
M.TXN_ID,
M.TXN_SRC,
M.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
M.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
M.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
M.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
D.DATE_VALUE AS VAL_DT,
D.DATE_DMN_ID,
D.FIN_WEEK_NUM AS FIN_WEEK_NUM,
D.FIN_YEAR_STRT AS FIN_YEAR_STRT,
D.FIN_YEAR_END AS FIN_YEAR_END
FROM
MIN_MX_DT M, proj_DATE_DMN D
WHERE
D.HOLIDAY_IND = 0
AND D.DATE_VALUE >= MIN_VAL_DT
AND D.DATE_VALUE <= MAX_VAL_DT),
DLY_HDRS
AS (
SELECT
S.TXN_ID AS TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC AS TXN_SRC,
S.DATE_DMN_ID AS VAL_DT_DMN_ID,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID AS HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID AS PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID AS PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
SUM
DECODE
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B5, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS MTM_AMT,
NVL (
LAG (
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B5, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0)))
OVER (
PARTITION BY S.TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID
ORDER BY S.VAL_DT),
0)
AS YSTDY_MTM,
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B4, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS CASH_AMT,
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B3, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS PAY_REC_AMT,
S.VAL_DT,
S.FIN_WEEK_NUM,
S.FIN_YEAR_STRT,
S.FIN_YEAR_END,
NVL (TRUNC (F.REVSN_DT), S.VAL_DT) AS REVSN_DT,
S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP
FROM
SLCT_RCRDS S,
proj_PSTNG_FCT F,
proj_ACNT_DMN AD,
proj_PNL_TYP_DMN PTD
WHERE
S.TXN_ID = F.TXN_ID(+)
AND S.TXN_SRC = F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC(+)
AND S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID = F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID = F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID = F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID(+)
AND S.DATE_DMN_ID = F.VAL_DT_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP = F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP(+)
AND SUBSTR (AD.ACNT_NUM, 0, 1) IN (1, 2, 3)
AND NVL (F.ACNT_DMN_ID, 1) = AD.ACNT_DMN_ID
AND NVL (F.PNL_TYP_DMN_ID, 1) = PTD.PNL_TYP_DMN_ID
GROUP BY
S.TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC,
S.DATE_DMN_ID,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
S.VAL_DT,
S.FIN_WEEK_NUM,
S.FIN_YEAR_STRT,
S.FIN_YEAR_END,
TRUNC (F.REVSN_DT),
S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
F.TXN_ID)
SELECT
D.TXN_ID,
D.VAL_DT_DMN_ID,
D.REVSN_DT,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.YSTDY_MTM,
D.MTM_AMT,
D.CASH_AMT,
D.PAY_REC_AMT,
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT AS DLY_PNL,
SUM (
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT)
OVER (
PARTITION BY D.TXN_ID,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.FIN_WEEK_NUM || D.FIN_YEAR_STRT || D.FIN_YEAR_END
ORDER BY D.VAL_DT)
AS WTD_PNL,
SUM (
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT)
OVER (
PARTITION BY D.TXN_ID,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.FIN_YEAR_STRT || D.FIN_YEAR_END
ORDER BY D.VAL_DT)
AS YTD_PNL,
D.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_PSTNG_TYP,
'EOD ETL' AS CRTD_BY,
SYSTIMESTAMP AS CRTN_DT,
NULL AS MDFD_BY,
NULL AS MDFCTN_DT
FROM
DLY_HDRS D
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
25 WINDOW SORT Cost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
24 WINDOW SORT Cost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
23 VIEW Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
22 WINDOW BUFFER Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
21 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
20 HASH JOIN Cost: 10,296,285 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PNL_TYP_DMN Cost: 3 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 5
19 HASH JOIN Cost: 10,296,173 Bytes: 2,695,349,628 Cardinality: 22,841,946
5 VIEW VIEW index$_join$_007 Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
4 HASH JOIN
2 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) proj_ACNT_DMN_PK Cost: 1 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
3 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) proj_ACNT_DMN_UNQ Cost: 1 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
18 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 10,293,077 Bytes: 68,925,225,244 Cardinality: 650,237,974
6 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PSTNG_FCT Cost: 913,986 Bytes: 4,545,502,426 Cardinality: 77,042,414
17 VIEW Cost: 7,300,017 Bytes: 30,561,184,778 Cardinality: 650,237,974
16 MERGE JOIN Cost: 7,300,017 Bytes: 230,184,242,796 Cardinality: 650,237,974
8 SORT JOIN Cost: 30 Bytes: 87,776 Cardinality: 3,376
7 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_DATE_DMN Cost: 29 Bytes: 87,776 Cardinality: 3,376
15 FILTER
14 SORT JOIN Cost: 7,238,488 Bytes: 25,269,911,792 Cardinality: 77,042,414
13 VIEW Cost: 1,835,219 Bytes: 25,269,911,792 Cardinality: 77,042,414
12 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 1,835,219 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 914,089 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_DATE_DMN Cost: 29 Bytes: 94,960 Cardinality: 4,748
10 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PSTNG_FCT Cost: 913,693 Bytes: 2,157,187,592 Cardinality: 77,042,414

While using Status for Object button it is taking more than 15 mins to open

Hi Gurus,
We are trying to attach documents to ZBOS & OR types sales documents , while opening the Status for Object button of the sales order it is taking more than 15 mins to open , once it is opened it is working as normal.
can you please let us know is it the system functionality because of which it is taking so much time to open or the problem is with something else.
please let us also know whether it is system impacting process.
We are using 4.6C.
Thank You,
Boyeni.

Hi Syed ,
Greetings!!!...
Thank you very much for your Swift response!.
could you be so kind to let me know The Program that needs to be refreshed.
Thank You once again for your Assistance.
Boyeni.

"Connecting to the network is taking longer than usual" message after I wake my computer from sleep

Connecting wirelessly after waking computer from sleep yields the message "connecting to the network is taking longer than usual". This only occurs after sleep, it also does not allow it to autoconnect like when starting the computer up. All
drivers seem to be up to date and happens at more than one wireless location, home and school. I have a windows 7 opperating system.

I just had the same problem with my HP Pavilion dv6 laptop.
I was able to resolve the problem by uninstalling my Intel Centrino Wireless Network adapter (but I did not delete the driver). I did this by right-clicking My Computer, Manage, Device Manager, expanded the Network Adapters group, and right-click the
Wireless Network Adapter and click Uninstall. I recommend that you reboot once this is done.
My laptop now connects to Wifi immediately after waking the laptop from sleep.
This is what finally resolved my problem. Sony Vaio with 64bit Windows 7. Wireless would sometimes take up to 3 minutes after Windows started to connect. After following these instructions, I first removed all wireless networks, then from the System Control
Panel I deleted (along with the driver) the Wireless Adapter. I then installed a fresh driver directly from the maker (not OEM).
I now connect to Wifi immediately after booting or waking from hibernation.
Thank you
Emmitt<abbr
class="affil" style="border:0px;font-style:inherit;font-family:inherit;margin:0px;outline:0px;padding:0px;display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;color:#000000;"></abbr>

Time is taking more than usual in running a report???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for