Time phase Min/max replenishment models for future dates

Hi,
We are working on a safety stock requirement of Maximum/Minimum replenishment model in APO.
It seems to work great except it cannot be time phased. Our business wants different safety stock strategies at different times of the year.
Please suggest if there is a way that we could “time phase” min/max replenishment models for future dates?
Thanks in advance for your help!
regards
Yogendra

Many thanks for this.
I can see entirely why it's designed as such, but I just find it slightly frustrating that there's no way to break the link between the order and the shipment out to the depot. Just to clarify, we're not requiring the orders to change - they will still be made and will come in - but just that the orders themselves don't specifically need to be the stock that is used for the replenishment.
So -
1. Min Max identifies depot needs replenishing.
2. Central distribution does not have (enough) stock to replenish.
3. Order is made to replenish central distributions stock.
4. We ship whatever we've got, when we've got it, to depot to replenish.
It's the bit where Min-Max is trying to replensih a specific depot rather than our central distribution centre that's my problem.
I suspect that, as you say, that specific issue is not directly fixable without getting our IT contractors to do a customisation.
I'm going to look into your Supply Date Offset suggestion now, though I'm not sure how this affects the shipping after the orders are placed. The orders themselves are approved manually after we've checked our stock position (i.e. what's in with the recycling team), but we recycle & refurb probably 60% of our maint stock so there'll always be kit turning up after the order has been made because of the long lead times.
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

[svn:fx-trunk] 13276: Min/ Max size fixes for AIR Window and WindowedApplication.

Revision: 13276
Revision: 13276
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-01-05 07:18:31 -0800 (Tue, 05 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
Min/Max size fixes for AIR Window and WindowedApplication.
AIR won?\226?\128?\153t allow you to set the min width greater than the current max width (same is true for height). You also can?\226?\128?\153t set the max width less than the current min width (same is true for height). The code that sets nativeWindow.minSize and nativeWindow.maxSize has been modified to take this into account.
QE notes: None.
Doc notes: None.
Bugs: SDK-24566
Reviewer: Corey
Tests run: checkintests, apollo/spark/components/Window.as, apollo/spark/components/WindowedApplication.as, apollo/Window, apollo/WindowedApplication
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24566
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/mx/core/Window.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/mx/core/WindowedApplication.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airspark/src/spark/components/Window.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airspark/src/spark/components/WindowedApplication.as

THank you , Nancy. Appreciate the input.
So instead of this:
<a class="brand" href="index.html"><img src="../img/logo-ca.png"alt="Consumers Advocate Review"> </a>
Would it be something like this?:
<a class="brand" href="index.html"><img src="http://ConsumersAdvocate/img/logo-ca.png"alt="Consumers Advocate Review"> </a>
And if I do that, is there a way to cope with that locally so that DW can still display the images?
jeff

Min Max replenishment

Hi,
i want to know whether is it possible to perform a Min Max replenishment in the WM module. if it is possible then you can explain on how to perform it and how to configure and carry the Min Max replenishment scenario.
thanks,
Maxx

Hi max,
Pls go through,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/c6/f85c504afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
regards
hareesha

Issue with CIF Integration model for Transaction data

Hi Gurus,
I have activated the Integration model for PO & PReqs by location wise and i assumed that transaction data is online and we need not to re activate for any new Product / location combination got created in system.
But the issue is that every time a new material got created, we need to deactivate and activate the integration model for Transaction data to get the transaction data into APO.
Is there any way to avoid the following exercise as it is taking very long time for activation.
Please guide me as it is very urgent.
Thanks for help in advance...
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh

I assume 1,60,000 location products are spread around different locations.
Rather than one Integration Model it is better to have multiple Integration Models.
For example: one for each region like North America, one for Europe, one for Asia (assuming you have countries spread across the world). Or create Intgeration Model by Country.
This way you reduce the number of Products in an Integration Model.
It is very important to have manageable set of Integration Models. Let me give an example - you have some problem hence the single Material Master Integration Model is down (inactive). At that time any PP or PDS transfer will not have the Header or COmponent products transferred to APO (in effect PDS/PPM cannot be transferred). If you are creating or converting Planned Orders they will not transfer to R/3 (as Header product is not part of active intgeration model).
But if you have country spefic or region specific Integration Model - only that country is affected not all.
In fact you should have other integration model (like PDS/PPM, Procurement Relationships, Planned / Production Orders, Sales Orders, Stocks) in same manner i.e. either Country(s) specific or group of countries by region. The risk of models getting inactive or taking too much time to activate after regeneration easily outweighs management of more number of Integration Models (compared to one Global integration model per object).
Hope this gives you some direction.
Somnath

GL assignment for future date?

Hi everybody,
We have an issue is as follows:
- We have created a sales order for 08-09-2008
- We have created PO for 08-09-2008, here system will able to post everything fine.
- Again we are creating one more PO for 08-09-2009, here system threws error message like GL a/c needs cost assignment.
My question is why system is asking assignment for future date only and why system is not asking assignment for current date?
Looking forward your best thoughts
regards
vk

Hi Raj,
Thanks for your reply
Yes, we have assigned only cost element in TC: OKB9. But, for that cost element we have created 2 analysis periods.
- GL 100115 01.01.2008 to 31.12.2008
- GL 100115 01.01.2009 to 31.12.9999
I think validity period is perfect still system threws error message like gl acc needs cost object assign.
regards
vk

RWDPOSUP For future date articles postings.

Hi All,
Currently we are running the program RWDPOSUP for sending articles from sap to third party.
I have a query.the system will pick articles which have a valid date from today or a specified number of days for example 30 days
all the validity is stored in the field DATAB of table A073 for instance(Pricing condition tables)..
So if the pricing has to be changed on march first then it takes the data on feb first and runs the idoc and data is sent to third party.
So if i post a document today i.e., 21st march 2010with date of validity as march first 2011. then ideally it should not pick and create an IDOC.
It should pick on feb first or jan 29th(30days before) and then create idoc. will the program RWDPOSUP run as desired.
for me if the DATAB is more than 30 days it should not create an IDOC only articles withing 30days are to be sent to third party.
Can you please suggest on this. i am searching where it looks for date validation but not succesful in that search.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
RK.

Hi,
I have changed it from W to E and saved , still system is prompting any message at all
document is getting posted for future date also .
in MB1B screen posting date is changeble field and if i try to put tomorrow date and try posting its getting posted
please help
please try at your end once .
regards,
madhu kiran.
Edited by: madhu kiran on Apr 24, 2009 11:19 AM

Expense reports are not processing for future date?

hi folks,
in our co.expense reports are not processing for future date, even though the end date is one month from now the expense reports are not getting paid.
can anybody assist me to come out of this issue.
thanks in advance,
regards
bhanu

HI,
Could you please share how to go Debug mode in Dymanic program, I have scenarion in SAP HR , when Employee is hire , during the hiring action Infotype 32 is updating based on following conditions
********INSERT IT0032 FOR CANDIDATE ID *************
P0001-PERSG<>'5' - True
P0000-MASSN='01'/X
P0000-MASSN='H1'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'84'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'86'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'99'/X
GET_PNALT(ZHR_CREATEP0032)
RP50D-FIELDS <> ''
INS,0032,,,(P0000-BEGDA),(P0000-ENDDA)/D
P0032-PNALT=RP50D-FIELD1
P0032-ZZ_COMPID='05' _ True
Infotype record is being created but there is no data in "RP50D-FIELD1 , so i tried to debug the subroutine GET_PNALT(ZHR_CREATEP0032) as mention in Dynamic action, its not going in debugger mode.
Do you have any Idea about how to debug the program. used in dynamic action
Regards,
Madhu

WMS Min Max replenishment - Auto allocate and create wms task

We using Oracle WMS and want to implement Min Max planning for replenishing from bulk to pick. The Min max report creates the move order but its not allocated and we need to run the Move Order Pick Slip report to create the allocation and wms task. Is there no other way of doing this as we need to pass the move order number when running Move Order Pick Slip report and would like to automate the process.

Hi,
As you have mentioned :
Replenishment qty to 10
and the max bin qty is 40
min bin qty is 10
available stock is 40
System will still not generate any TR since your available qty is not less than min bin qty.
Reduce your available bin qty less than 10 then only it will generate TR.
Or keep min qty as 100 , Max qty as 1000 and replenishment qty as 100 and then check.
Please read the Program documentation for LP21 ( Blue icon on lp21 input screen) for calculation .
Minimum stock     =   10
Maximum stock     = 100
Replenishment qty =   40
Storage bin stock =    5
Since the storage bin stock has fallen below the minimum stock level defined in the material master, the system calculates a quantity to be supplied to this storage bin. The system attempts to increase the total quantity in the bin (5) by multiplying the replenishment quantity (40) as many times as possible to match the maximum quantity defined for the bin (100) without exceeding it. For the supply quantity, the system calculates 80 pieces (5 + 2 x 40 = 85 < 100).
Regards,
Shailesh

Restrict Time Entry for Future Date in Portal

Hi Gurus,
My scenario is to restrict users from entering future date attendance in Portal.
I know the configurations for restrictiong the user from scrolling to future week.
But in my scenario users will be able to scroll to future weeks but should be restricted with an error message while trying to enter future time.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
Thanks.
Regards
Sairam Maharaj S
Please search in the ESS forum as I remember responding to a similar scenario some time back. Thread is moved.
~Suresh

Hi Srini,
Thanks for your reply.
I have achieved this by deselcting Release Future Time option. But user wants the future time to be restricted even from getting saved. Can I make changes to the default information message "1 out of 1 future time not released" to an error message so that the user will not be able to save. If so please let me know if this can be achieved from any configuration of messages or it should be done from the programming side.
Thanks.
Regards
Sairam Maharaj S

Ideal model for accesing data

i'm trying to transfer some data (about 100,000 rows) to mysql database. i already has my Data Access Object(DAO), so i reuse it. when my DAO add about 500 rows, this exception occurs:
com.mysql.jdbc.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure due to underlying exception:
** BEGIN NESTED EXCEPTION **
java.net.SocketException
MESSAGE: java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect
STACKTRACE:
java.net.SocketException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect
        at com.mysql.jdbc.StandardSocketFactory.connect(StandardSocketFactory.java:151)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.<init>(MysqlIO.java:280)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:1691)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.<init>(Connection.java:405)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:268)
        at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:512)
        at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171)
        at trade.connector.ConnectionProvider.getConnection(ConnectionProvider.java:71)
        at trade.access.LoginValidator.validate(LoginValidator.java:29)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.getUser(UserAccess.java:124)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.addUser(UserAccess.java:162)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.main(UserAccess.java:254)
** END NESTED EXCEPTION **
        at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:1754)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.<init>(Connection.java:405)
        at com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:268)
        at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:512)
        at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171)
        at trade.connector.ConnectionProvider.getConnection(ConnectionProvider.java:71)
        at trade.access.LoginValidator.validate(LoginValidator.java:29)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.getUser(UserAccess.java:124)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.addUser(UserAccess.java:162)
        at trade.access.UserAccess.main(UserAccess.java:254)
Exception in thread "main" i retry transfering but this exception occurs again and again. if i retry after about 1 minute, it can resume transfering about 500 rows again.
Is this problem cause by database protection from network flood attack? i use single shot connection method (connect when needed, and disconnect when job done). so if add method need 2 query (2 times connect), it takes about 1000 re-connection.
i change connection from single shot connection to connection pooling. the problem still occurs... so i assume the protection apply for statement (i recreate statement for about 1000 times). finally i write extra code for transfering. reuse statement (Prepared Statement),not close and recreate and problem solve.
So what 'ideal model' for DAO (logical layer)? for every access method, we create Statement, use it, and close it. this will cause database server block our connection when using this method repeatly (over 1000 times). if we leave the statement open, it will cost network traffic to keep it alive and we often use only a part accesing method, not all.

you are right malcolmmc. i'm running out of local port. i check with netstat & here is the output:
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3987         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3988         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3989         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3990         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3991         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3992         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3993         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3994         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3995         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3996         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3997         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3998         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:3999         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4000         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4001         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4002         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4003         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4004         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4005         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4006         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4007         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4008         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4009         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4010         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4011         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4012         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4013         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4014         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4015         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4016         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4017         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4018         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4020         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4021         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4022         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4023         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4024         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4025         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4026         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4027         TIME_WAIT
TCP    TOSHIBA2450:3306       localhost:4028         TIME_WAITi already try to change my code to use only one connection. and the result is same. i assume create statement will create a new connection. i mean althought i'm not re-creating java.sql.Connection, but when i create java.sql.Statement, it will create new TCP/IP Connection. but i do call:
preparedstatement.close();
pool.returnConnection(con); // con.close();i wonder how to close this connection (tcp/ip)...

Weblogic portal content published for future date.

Hi,
I am using Weblogic portal 10.3, need to publish a content item for futhre date , i tried adding the date and time to startDate property and published it, and the changes got reflected immediately.
has any one got his done.
Regards
Chandrakant

Hi Deepak,
Case 1 -
Assuming that there is a version which is currently displayed on the portal, if the business has published 3 future versions already (not yet published on portal), then he can make any changes in any of the future versions and have them automatically published.
Case 2 -
If there is a version which is currently displayed and there are 2 future versions published in the repository already, if the business user wants to make any changes in the current version, he just changes and re-publishes for the updated stuff to appear on the portal.
Case 3 - overlaps
Incase of 2 published versions with the same start dates but varying end dates, as the content selector will pick up both the nodes into the arraylist. In that case we can write a comparator, which incase of same start dates, do a comparison on the version id, and then pick the latest version. but in that case, we may lose one version. I guess in that case, we will have to advise the user handling this versionong to provide sequential dates for all the versions.
I hope I have got the issue right and covered all the cases.
Thanks

Restricting the Travel expense claims for future date

Hi,
We are configuring the BPs for ESS & MSS. Currently we are on NW portal 7.0 ,SPS15 and ECC6.0 at the backend.
Can anyone suggest us, how to restrict the users NOT to apply the Travel expense claims for the future dates (i.e.the portal system is expected to allow the users for the claims, till the current date or any past date but not any future date) through portal.
Currently, the system is allowing the users to apply the Travel Expense claims for the future dates also.
Any help on this will be appreciated.
Regards,
Venu

Hi Venu,
I am not sure whether there is any configuration through which it can be achieved or not. But you can use Badi TRIP_WEB_CHECK for WebDynpro.
Hope this will help.
Thanks & regards
Arun

EREC : Lock SAP user ID for future date

Hi ,
Can anyone suggest a way to Lock an SAP user id for a Future Date .
Thanks in advance,
Tk

Hi,
Instead of locking you can better delimit so that you can have a history for audit reasons.
i dont find business requirement for locking user.
thanks
rafi

Integration model for transactinoa data

Hi
what is the transaction code to reactivate integration model for the transactional data, let say example, changes in po or sales order after activating the integaration model. which transaction code we have to use reactivate. please any one help me

Hi somnath , Online Transfer of Transaction Data using BTE is activated in R/3 SPRO (should be enabled for ND-APO application)
I think above what u mentioned is cfc9 tansaction code. It is mainly meant for materila master, vendor master , customers. simply menat for master data.But for transacrtional data likoe PO's , SO will not come into picture. Right?
Please clarify me.
Online Transfer of Transaction Data using BTE is activated in R/3 SPRO (should be enabled for ND-APO application).
2) Publication settings (Distribution Definitions) maintained in APO for the locations in SPRO.
Can u tell me the path or transaction code for the above event

Data flow model for Master data extraction

Hello friends,
I have the following scenario where the report layout looks like this. What would be the data flow model for this example if I'm loading master data from R/3
KNVV     KNA1     KNVP     KNA1     KNA1     KNVP     KNA1
VKORG     KATR1     KUNN2     NAME1     KTOKD     KUNNR     NAME1
Sales Org     BCG     Payer No      Payer Nm     Acc Grp     Sold 2 No     Sold 2 Name
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks

Balaji,
are you trying to develop a master data IOBJ for the field combination given and want to know how to proceed ?
Did you check out if the current 0customer master data already has the required fields ?
otherwise you can
1. create a view for the master
2. create a FM for the same and use that as a datasource.
I would suggest you look at the customer master that comes as part of business content first.
Arun
Assign points if useful

Time phase Min/max replenishment models for future dates

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for