Timeline setting for jpeg vids

Hi all, I've read the answer to this before, but I've been searching and can't find it...I am editing video that is 640X480 30 fps and the timeline setting is photo jpeg at 75% quality. Everyone says to set the quality at 75%, but I've forgotten why exactly - anybody out there with a better memory than mine?
thanks!

Do you think you might mean setting the dpi to 72?
That will give you a normal-ish size photo for 100% scale to be about the same size/pixels as your canvas.
But that's kind of old school what with now digital cameras and photos etc.
Are you sure you mean quality? Maybe to ease up on the edges and moire effects?? Not sure. I'll wager it was 72 dpi that you read about.
CaptM

Similar Messages

Why is there not a timeline setting for 23.98 (23.976)

This just seems to add even more confusion to the already confusing world of frame rates. Camera manufactures are the most guilty in this realm. Why do we need simplificarion all the time? Why not call it what it is?

Does PPro create a correct sequence when you do the below?
For CS5 and later, the easy way to insure that your video and your project match
See 2nd post for picture of NEW ITEM process http://forums.adobe.com/message/3776153
-and a FAQ on sequence setting http://forums.adobe.com/message/3804341

Save to Web for JPEG Does Not Work

Originally when I installed CS4, save to web worked great. When I would downsize an image so as to post on the web, it would downsize with ease and I could save it as a JPEG.
Problem now: On the right upper corner of the page, I have it set for JPEG. When I downsize the image to 250, the "GIF" in the far left bottom corner does not convert over to JPEG. Thus, the image is not getting downsized properly as it used to.
I still have Photoshop Elements 7 on my computer so now when I want to downsize an image, I work on it first in CS4, get out of CS4 and then go into PS7.
Again, for weeks, the GIF would turn into JPEG on the far let. Now in CS4 it does not.
What do I need to do to fix this? I have added a screenshot to show my settings in CS4.
Thanks.

Are you saying if you select JPEG top right it still says GIF bottom left of the preview window?
How and where are you "downsizing to 250" ? 250 what?

'Maximum' Quality Setting for Previews

Dear Adobe,
Aside from 'Low', 'Medium', and 'High' settings for standard-size previews, please add a 'Maximum' quality setting (equivalent to 10-12 quality setting for JPEGs in Photoshop).
As standard previews are generated for imported images or for new edits on images already in Lightroom, sometimes low quality JPEG previews are generated. These previews exhibit color banding & macroblocking artifacts typical of JPEG files (especially in dark areas). Since these previews are used in the Library, Slideshow, Print, and Web modules, it's pretty darn annoying & distracting to stare at low-quality renditions of our images. Switch to Develop module, and a fresh new image is rendered on screen; therefore, these JPEG preview artifacts are not visible in the 'Develop' module.
Two fixes to this problem:
1.) Add a 'Maximum' quality setting for previews that Lightroom generates
2.) Fix it the Aperture, Bridge, iPhoto, 'every-other-software', and your own 'Develop' module way: display the precached preview first, while rending a fresh view of the image in the background... display that when it's ready.
Here's a forum where I've discussed this previously:
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?128@@.3bc33a73
Here are examples of the low-quality previews generated by Lightroom (when 1680 'High' setting is used for previews):
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/iWeb/Homepage/Macroblocking.jpg
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/iWeb/Homepage/Library.jpg
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/iWeb/Homepage/Library_vs_Develop.jpg
And if you are using a well calibrated monitor, then look at the macroblocking in the black wool coat in this image (please use a color managed viewer, else the coat will just look black and you won't see the blocking):
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/iWeb/Homepage/Lightroom_JPEGblocking.jpg
We photographers have discerning eyes. It's painful to see this terrible renditions of our precious images... and to have to switch over to the 'Develop' module *just* to get a high-quality rendition of our image? And meanwhile watch slideshows with low-quality versions (previews) of our images?
Sounds pretty unacceptable to me.

So, I'm pretty much convinced now that the problem with low-quality LR previews seems to be mostly isolated to the previews that LR generates after you make edits in the 'Develop' module.
Upon first import, this image looked fine in the 'Library' & 'Slideshow' modules. After making some edits (color, tone, etc.) in the 'Develop' module, I ended up getting this hideous preview in the 'Library' & 'Slideshow' modules:
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/Lightroom/07-0310_BandingBlocking.jpg
You people with LCDs will be able to see the JPEG artifacts better than those with CRTs, since LCDs tend to be sharper.
So, the obvious question is this:
Does LR, when *re-generating* previews for edited images, ignore the quality-setting for JPEG previews (which I have set to 'high')??

High (Maximum) Security Setting for FIOS Firewall

If you set the maximum security setting on the Verizon FIOS Firewall then whenever Verizon decides to swap its IP's you are screwed; the unit will not get the new IP.
To compensage for the maximum settings I have enable all of the verizon unit (SBU's) to have unrestricted access aka ANY but this does not do the trick.
Verizon in its ultimate wisdom has not bothered to document anywhere what are the minimum outbould settings should be that would enable this communication in the High (Maximum) security mode.
Does anyone from Verizon read this stuff?

So, I'm pretty much convinced now that the problem with low-quality LR previews seems to be mostly isolated to the previews that LR generates after you make edits in the 'Develop' module.
Upon first import, this image looked fine in the 'Library' & 'Slideshow' modules. After making some edits (color, tone, etc.) in the 'Develop' module, I ended up getting this hideous preview in the 'Library' & 'Slideshow' modules:
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/Lightroom/07-0310_BandingBlocking.jpg
You people with LCDs will be able to see the JPEG artifacts better than those with CRTs, since LCDs tend to be sharper.
So, the obvious question is this:
Does LR, when *re-generating* previews for edited images, ignore the quality-setting for JPEG previews (which I have set to 'high')??

Jpeg camera setting for Lightroom inport

Hi, I have a Canon s3is that I use to shoot maybe 1,000 pictures a week. I have been trying out the Lightroom demo and really love the way it help me process all the pictures. Most of the pictures are used to document processes, so gallery level images are not required. But for about 5% of the pictures I need to get the best possible resulting image within the constraints of the capabilities of the s3is. Ideally I would like the camera to support a raw format which would give me the most flexibility to get those perfect final images in lightroom, but the s3is only supports jpeg image output. Are there optimum camera setting for minimizing the processing the camera will do and then do any processing in lightroom. Or is it better to just let camera try and optimize the image and then do any remaining work in lightroom.
Getting a new camera is not an option at this time.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Jay

You have two choices.
I have an S3 and have come up with the settings I feel are best for post-processing. They are:
Contrast -2
Sharpness -2
Saturation -1
Green -1
Of course, always shoot at maximum resolution.
The other option is to get the CHDK hack for the S3, which gives it RAW mode. You can use a DNG converter to convert the resulting images to a Lightroom-readable format. http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ

PREMIERE ELEMENTS 10 PRESET FOR JPEG 720P 30 FPS VIDEO

I have a Panasonic Lumic DMC FZ35 camera which can take videos in jpeg hd (720p) 30 fps. What would be the appropriate preset?

There is no perfect setting for that video. It's not the best stuff for editing. (The camcorder is pretty made for shooting and then uploading to YouTube.)
But your best bet is probably the DSLR/720p 30 setting.
Although remember to render (press Enter) whenever you see red lines above the clips on your timeline!

Where did all the setting for printing go in PSE8-Mac?!

OK, I'm probably missing some obvious settings somewhere, please tell me after you read my rantings...
I'm using the 'Full Edit' mode, assuming that is important. But the new Print Dialog looks like it has been dumbed down for some one, not sure who, however has it has me completely confused. There are now only three 'steps' for printing. One and two are self explanatory. However...
Step three concerns paper size, image size and several other details. Just for testing, I created a new 4 x 6 inch, 300dpi page and drew some lines. Command-P. Proper printer is selected, select "Letter" as the paper size. 4 x 6 inch appears selected as the "Print size" (I thought that was because of the original page size, but it appears to simply be the default). That is a detail that could easily be over looked by a new user. If the original image is larger than 4 x 6, it will, obviously be either cropped or reduced to fit those dimensions! It seems to me that the "Select Print Size" should automatically assume to be the image size. OTOH, I can see that some people may want to do all their printing on one size of paper. In that case, why not have a preference for the default and let the user change it when they change paper sizes (if they want)?
Now, if the user happens to notice that a new 8 x 10 inch image is going to be printed in a 4 x 6 area, she will now decide to check the other settings available in the pop up menu. OK, there IS an 8 x 10 inch choice. But look, what's this "Custom" choice? Let's investigate...Now this is strange! The defaults there seem to be 1.383 inches for height AND width! Who came up with that weird number?!
Oh, there is a "Scale to Fit Media" check box. Checking that now makes the height and width somewhat closer to reality, they now indicate the pape dimensions. That IS logical, but not extremely helpful, IMHO. By the way, the second time one selects the "Custom" choice, the correct, original image size appeared in the Print size boxes. Although I cannot seem to get those to reappear. Oh well...
My point is, how do these confusing configurations help? Beyond me, anyway.
BTW, the dpi settings all seem to be 'computed' at one less than the number set by the user for an image. For example, a new image page created at 300 dpi shows 299 in the Custom dialog, 150 shows 149, etc. Close, but why not exact? Furthermore, why can't the user select any dpi they choose? Isn't that what the computer if for; calculate what happens to the pixels when they print at a different setting than the image? Sure, the user should be warned that terrible images my result, but if that's what the user wants, let it be done! Who's running this show, anyway? Oh yeah, I remember, now...excuse me for asking, I'm only a paying customer, what do I know?!
Lastly, if one has more than one image open, every single one can easily be printed, accidentally. Why? Because they will all appear in the Print Dialog. Don't you see them? Over there on the left. Yeah, I see them, but why doesn't the image I have in front, the one I'm working on, be the one I probably want to print? Many of the others may simply be images I'm borrowing parts from. Why do the developers think I always want to print every image that might be open? I don't have any idea, either. Sure, there are a couple of ways to prevent this multiple image printing; select the one you don't want to print and use the "minus" button or simply close all those images before going to the Print dialog. Guess what. Using the 'minus' button only works for this printing, the next time you ask to print they will all be there, again. And, what if you aren't really finished using some of those extra images that you closed? Now you get to re-open them all again. Completely unnecessary steps because of poor user considerations/research, in my humble opinion. Again, this is exactly the thing that preferences are made for. Or, put them in the "Edit Guided" mode! Or, better yet, just give me back the old Print dialog! Nice!
Now, I am extremely glad to see that PSE can now remember to keep that stupid Panel bin out of the way! Finally! Three more inches of screen to work with!!! Hooray!! Unfortunately, it still can't remember what the last setting for the jpeg quality was...still defaults to ZERO! Sure, that's the setting I always want to use, it's so much fun letting people try to guess what is in the image...one would think after 8 iterations this could be fixed. One down, umpteen to go. Oh well, what do you want for $80?

Thanks for your listening/reading and I'll take your advice about dropping a note to the developers, but I won't be holding by breath! I doubt that they consider this a real problem. It's really just my ranting!
Your solution is probably the 'fix' they might suggest, anyway. However, I'd rather have the screen space than a list of thumbnails of images I already have open. command-plus and/or minus is a pretty quick way of making it easy to see anything that might be visible. Of course, I'm sure there are other uses for the Project Bin that many find useful. Even though I have a 24" iMac, I rather like using the screen space the way I want, not an arbitrary way that got developed. I just don't see why developers can't program an app to allow every conceivable method of use by every living and future user! LOL!!!
I guess today was the first time I've printed anything since installing 8. I was, quite confused when presented with the new Print interface. Actually, I thought that must be part of the 'Guided' set up which I assume leads one by the hand as much as possible. "Thank you Adobe, but I'm trying to avoid unnecessary contact with strangers right now." LOL! At least I know I didn't miss some setting somewhere.
Thanks! Have a great weekend! And don't get scared too much tonight!

Best setting for gif animations

what is the optimal setting for animated gifs

Depends on your style and your training as an animator, and
what your project goals are: straight animation? interactivity?
e-cards? Traditional animators used to drawing frame-by-frame with
exposure sheets will feel more comfortable with Toon Boom Studio
(www.toonboom.com). It has far superior drawing tools and color
pallette management and timeline management than Flash. But if
you're used to Illustrator, that may make no difference to you. It
appears that the upcoming Flash CS4 will narrow the gap, as the
interface appears to include enhancements that will be more
familiar to traditional animators, not to mention IK, which Toon
Boom Studio doesn't have (the highly expensive Toon Boom Solo does
have it).
That said, I think Flash is a great program for creating
cartoon animation. You may not think you're interested in
ActionScript programming at this point. I use Flash mainly for
cartoon animation and I resisted ActionScript for a few years. But
once you get used to Flash as an animation tool, and then decide to
dip your little toe into ActionScript, you'll find out what an
astounding tool it is, even for traditional animation, enabling you
to do things impossible in more traditional-oriented programs. Plus
now Flash and Illustrator are fairly well integrated, so you'll be
able to import and export between the two.
On balance, I'd go for Flash.

My Canon Rebel is no longer recording RAW images but set for RAW in manual mode.

I've tried changing memory card. My card's been recently formatted. I tried setting quality as RAW only not both RAW + Jpg...but still not getting RAW images in upload. Lightroom settings are fine and able to upload RAW from my Canon G12. I tried clearing setting but no affect. Is a factory reset a possible solution?

Debbie wrote:
Tahdah, tahdah and just plain dahhhh!!! I figured it out and if I share the answer I'll sound just plain stupid. But here goes in case someone else has the same problem, or should I say the same misunderstanding. In short, as it turns out I didn't have the quality set on RAW. I had checked, and rechecked the menu>quality window several times and each time misread it until I was just looking in the manual. In it the list of quality options is in a single column. In camera RAW is in a second column next to L with a quarter circle. I thought I had RAW selected. I'd been saying that the letter L was there. The manual, thank goodness, had the single column and said that was a JPG. Here I was reading about battery checks etc and there it was. I had been checking settings a while back and managed to change from RAW to JPG and not figured that I'd not changed back correctly. Whew!!! Call me dumb but I'm stupidly delighted right now ;o) Thanks to all those who tried to help.
OK, Debbie, maybe you'll feel better after I confess to doing something every bit as stupid. Recently my wife and I were driving home from a visit to our daughter's house in Philadelphia, and I used the opportunity to drop off my two 7D's and a couple of lenses at Canon's Jamesburg service facility for their usual cleaning and inspection. (I'm a CPS Gold Member, so it's an included perk.) I knew from previous experience that this would result in a partial clearing of the camera's user settings. Some items, like my name and copyright notice, would be left intact; but others, like my autofocus microadjustment settings, would be wiped. I was ready for that, had long since committed the AFMA's to a spreadsheet, etc.
But alas, I overlooked the fact that the quality setting that you cite above was one of those that would revert to its factory default. And the default is high-resolution JPEG, not RAW. (I always use RAW, and my favorite photo editor, Digital Photo Professional, does a crummy job on JPEGs.) So a week later I blithely walked into a moderately important photo shoot with one of my cameras set to JPEG. Fortunately, the other camera I was using, an almost new 5D Mark III, hadn't been to Jamesburg and was correctly set to RAW. But about two thirds of the photos I took were JPEGs, so I'll have to block out a few hours, sit down with Irfanview or some other editor, and try to fix things up. It doesn't much matter when I get it done, and the world won't come to an end, but it's pretty damned embarrassing.
So there you have it. We all make mistakes.
Bob
Boston, Massachusetts USA

Naming R3d Files in Premier + Timeline Settings for 4K plus archival HD and SD footage

We recently made the switch over to Premier and are beginning post on our first 4k 16x9 project. Very exciting to be editing with the raw r3d files, our one concern is that naming the files (it is a feature doc with a lot of footage) in premier will break the link to the orginal file once we export via xml to resolve for the online as well as to go back to color correct in Red CineX. Is this correct or comepletely misguided. My gut says that naming the files in premier is just adding to the metadata associated with the clip and the export should be fine. Can you please set me straight?
We are also going to be adding archival footage from 1080 to SD with varied frame rates. The bulk of the footage is shot at 4k 16x9 at 23.98. What would you recommend our timeline setting be set at? Ultimately we will be exporting at 1080, but ideally want to keep the timeline as high res as possible for future export at higher resolutions.
Thank you for your help and guidance!
Best,
Travis Rummel
felt soul media

I'm afraid there probably isn't a good way to scale SD to 4K...
unless it originated on film and you can go back to transfer.
Magic Bullet Instant HD works pretty well upscaling SD to HD.
when you say renamiong can "sometimes make tracing the original media file on disk more difficult"
I am referring to file management on disk as it relates to the Project.
For example if you load all of your media and change the file names,
then discover that there is something quirky with a particular file... it will
make it more difficult to trace on disk for evaluation.
It will not affect the media reference in .xml export at all.

Elements 11 - How do I Change default setting on jPEG OPTIONS

Hi Guys,
Can anyone tell me how to change the default setting under Jpeg options when saving changes, at present its ticked for Qulaity 12 Max but we want it on Quality 8 high and its a real pain having to change this setting every time we edit an image.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Dane

I have full admin privileges on this iMac but right clicking does nothing?
Kind Regards,
Dane Coletta
Telephone: 02392 556666 (Monday- Friday 10.00 - 5.00pm)
Fax: 02392 178382
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.dream-watches.co.uk
We are one of the UK's leading independent Rolex dealers operating from our shop on the South Coast of England Monday - Friday 10.00am - 5pm. Please contact us to arrange an appointment.
This email and any files transmitted with it contain confidential and privileged, or copyright information, and are intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail other than to notify us. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. We cannot guarantee the e-mail transmission will be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or be incomplete, or contain viruses, although due care has been taken to minimise risk. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a paper version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any products, services, securities or related financial instruments.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Dream Watches Ltd

Best QT export setting for istockphoto?

Hi.
I want to export my footage using PPro CS5 for uploading onto istockphoto.com.
The required format is QuickTime (Photo-JPEG).
This is the source summary:
1440x1080 (1.3333), 29.97fps, Upper
(was shot with Sony AX2000)
Does anyone know the best export setting for this footage?
I tried this...
Format:QT
Preset:Custom
Codec:Photo-JPEG
1440x1080
29.97fps
Upper First
Aspect: HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)
Then, the exported video looks vertically streched...
What am I doing wrong?
Please help.
Thank you!
Kitty_Kai

You're probably doing nothing wrong. Many players will not unsqueeze the footage automatically, you have to tell it to do that with a keypress or menu setting.

Timeline progress for Flash in Encore

When building a video to export to Flash, everything works fine, however when opening up the finished web page and playing one of the videos, there is no "timeline progress bar" to allow web users to move to wherever desired, as is standard with videos. The only thing I see are default buttons (that are DVD-like), which are great for DVDs, but not for the web. Is this a feature that I am missing (I am new to Encore)? Is it possible?
Thanks!
tom

I think it is the BluRay encoder settings. I'm in CS3 now, waiting for more vid card support before going to CS5. That was my question: should I be increasing or reducing the BluRay, actually 1080i, encoder settings. I'm at 10/18/24 in PPRO to create .mv2 files to import into Encore. (I am under the impression both Encore and PPRO use the same encoder so it doesn't matter where I encode). Flashes are occuring in sections with no transitions, effect, titles, etc--just plain old HDV film from a SONY HDR FX7 with one or two audio tracks -mic and a .wav file (PCM) . It's random. Sometimes a whole film with no problem and plenty of effects, other times big problems and a simple film. That's why I am narrowing it down to encoder settings, but I'm not an expert and appreciate the help people give here!

I use Photoshop Elements 11 to print panoramas. Works for jpeg images but not tiff. Suggestions?

I use Photoshop Elements 11 to print panoramas. It works for jpeg images but not for tiff images. Seems strange because PSE11 manages tiff images in all other processes. Anyone fared better?

Thank you for your trouble.
My images are not usually layered and the particular case I am about to quote, it is not. The dimensions are 10,546 x 2,790 and the image has 16.7 mbs. I use 8 bit colour. When I set up the print screens for tiff, everything is normal until I get to the last screen with the image set upon the photo paper. Then the paper size indicated with the image refuses to budge from the A4 size, so the panorama gets printed on that. I consulted the Adobe chat line and the expert could 't get it to work either. So he came to the conclusion that the tiff capability had not been extended to printing panoramas. In seeking advice, I thought someone might refer me to an updating patch!
Well done! You have confounded the system! I could not find any control that would override the setting.

Timeline setting for jpeg vids

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for