TMG Inbound rule/network does't apply

Hello,
I'm having some issues with my 'non-web server protocol publishing rule' and a Network rule. I'm trying to setup acccess from www to a local ftp.
I've created a rule mentioned above, but this doesn't work, because the 'Network rules do not allow the conn..'
I have following Network rules in place:
1: Source Network (SN): Local host, Destination Network (DN)
All Networks (and Local Host), [route]
2: SN: FTP, DN: External 
[nat]
3: SN: External, DN: FTP
[route]
So, in 'my world' there should be access from external Networks to the FTP Network, but still I see connections blocked in the log?
Can I ask for some advice..
best regards
Jesper Vindum, Denmark

Hi,
Actually, it is impossible that the relationship between two networks is the NAT and Route at the same time.
For example, let us assume that there is a customer located in perimeter. This customer access a FTP server depends on the routing relationship between external and perimeter. Meanwhile,
he would like to access the external website which requires relationship between external and perimeter is NAT. At this time, we find something conflict.
Based on
RFC 1918, private IP cannot be routed on internet. So if the IP addresses in perimeter are private IPs and the relationship between external and perimeter is route, customer located in perimeter cannot access internet even if configuration and anything
else is completely right, because ISP would block all the traffic which has a private source IP address. 
In addition, if you configure two network rules for the two same object (for example, rule 2 and rule 4 in your sketch), TMG hits the rule which is close the top of the list.
Best Regards
Quan Gu 

Similar Messages

  • Windows 7 Firewall - Inbound rule

    I am using FileZilla FTP Server, I created (manually) my own inbound rule, but it didn't work, I mean I was not able to access the FTP Server. Then I ran the "Troubleshoot my network" assistant, and it created a new inbound rule in Windows
    Firewall, this inbound rule worked perfectly, I was able to access the FTP Server.
    Then, I modified the inbound rule created by me to exactly match the inbound rule created by the  "Troubleshoot my network" assistant, but still the inbound rule created by me doesn't work.
    My question is: Does the "Troubleshoot my network" assistant also modify or create other things? If so, what does it modify or create?
    Thank you very much

    Hi,
    We might use the network troubleshooter event logs to take a look at this issue, more details, please check:
    Use Network troubleshooter event logs to solve network problems
    Best regards
    Michael Shao
    TechNet Community Support

  • MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules)

    Can any one tell what this mean ?
    MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules) :
    is this means that it wont help for datasources for any J2EE application ????
    Inactive Connection Timeout     
    The number of inactive seconds on a reserved connection before WebLogic Server reclaims the connection and releases it back into the connection pool.
    You can use the Inactive Connection Timeout feature to reclaim leaked connections - connections that were not explicitly closed by the application. Note that this feature is not intended to be used in place of properly closing connections.
    When set to 0, the feature is disabled.
    MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules) :
    JDBCConnectionPoolParamsBean.InactiveConnectionTimeoutSeconds
    Minimum value: 0
    Maximum value: 2147483647

    Yes!, they do not apply for any applications they are management interfaces, internal to weblogic.
    Below is the brief information about it:
    A managed bean (MBean) is a Java bean that provides a Java Management Extensions (JMX) interface. JMX is the J2EE solution for monitoring and managing resources on a network.
    BEA WebLogic Server provides a set of MBeans that you can use to configure, monitor, and manage WebLogic Server resources through JMX. This reference document organizes WebLogic Server MBeans into the following categories:
    MBeanServer Services, which serve as your entry point into navigating the MBean hierarchies. Some of these MBeans contain attributes and operations for managing changes to WebLogic Server configuration MBeans.
    Configuration MBeans, which expose attributes and operations for configuring WebLogic Server resources.
    Runtime MBeans, which provide information about the runtime state of its resources.
    New MBeans, which have been added in the current release of WebLogic Server. These new MBeans are also listed in other categories in this document (for example, new runtime MBeans are also listed under the Runtime MBeans category).
    Deprecated MBeans, which are deprecated in the current release of WebLogic Server.

  • Windows Server 2012 R2 - ALL HF's Failing to install as "Does Not Apply to this computer"

    Hi,
    A general question about hot fix installs.
    I have multiple servers that are all Windows 2012 R2. They do not have internet connections, so I have to install the Hotfixes manually. I download the HF's from the ISO download page (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/913086) every month. I collect them and install in a bulk install during a release cycle ( a couple times a year). I just realized that NO HF's have installed since JUNE 2014. Every HF that shows up in WindowsServer2012R2 directory fail to install with a message of "The update is not applicable to your computer". Which is fine if that was true, but.... I get this message for every HF from the ISO's since June 2014. NOT one HF thinks it is applicable to my computer. Could that be the case? No HF's apply to my Server 2012 systems since June of 2014?
    This is my system info, and below that is the results from attempting to install 95 HF's.
    C:\TEMP>systeminfo
    Host Name: MYHOST
    OS Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter
    OS Version: 6.3.9600 N/A Build 9600
    OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
    OS Configuration: Member Server
    OS Build Type: Multiprocessor Free
    Registered Owner: Windows User
    Registered Organization:
    Product ID: 00252-80025-36226-AA727
    Original Install Date: 6/13/2014, 8:04:39 AM
    System Boot Time: 3/16/2015, 2:34:45 PM
    System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
    System Model: PowerEdge R720
    System Type: x64-based PC
    Processor(s): 2 Processor(s) Installed.
    [01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
    el ~2500 Mhz
    [02]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
    el ~2500 Mhz
    BIOS Version: Dell Inc. 2.2.2, 1/16/2014
    Windows Directory: C:\Windows
    System Directory: C:\Windows\system32
    Boot Device: \Device\HarddiskVolume1
    System Locale: en-us;English (United States)
    Input Locale: en-us;English (United States)
    Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
    Total Physical Memory: 262,099 MB
    Available Physical Memory: 249,337 MB
    Virtual Memory: Max Size: 301,011 MB
    Virtual Memory: Available: 288,015 MB
    Virtual Memory: In Use: 12,996 MB
    Page File Location(s): C:\pagefile.sys
    Domain: mydomain.sgn
    Logon Server: \\MYHOST
    Hotfix(s): 25 Hotfix(s) Installed.
    [01]: KB2862152
    [02]: KB2868626
    [03]: KB2876331
    [04]: KB2888505
    [05]: KB2892074
    [06]: KB2893294
    [07]: KB2893984
    [08]: KB2898785
    [09]: KB2898868
    [10]: KB2898871
    [11]: KB2900986
    [12]: KB2901125
    [13]: KB2901128
    [14]: KB2909210
    [15]: KB2909921
    [16]: KB2912390
    [17]: KB2916036
    [18]: KB2919442
    [19]: KB2922229
    [20]: KB2923392
    [21]: KB2925418
    [22]: KB2930275
    [23]: KB2931358
    [24]: KB2931366
    [25]: KB2936068
    Network Card(s): 6 NIC(s) Installed.
    [01]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: ISCSI
    DHCP Enabled: No
    IP address(es)
    [01]: 192.168.1.30
    [02]: fe80::38c9:e59c:5ac2:e0a1
    [02]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
    Client)
    Connection Name: NIC3
    Status: Hardware not present
    [03]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
    Client)
    Connection Name: MGMT
    DHCP Enabled: No
    IP address(es)
    [01]: 7.48.64.32
    [02]: 7.48.64.30
    [03]: fe80::f14e:9339:9326:c7fd
    [04]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 1_swport_VMRepwan
    DHCP Enabled: Yes
    DHCP Server: N/A
    IP address(es)
    [05]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: NIC2
    Status: Hardware not present
    [06]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 2_swport_VMOpswan
    DHCP Enabled: Yes
    DHCP Server: N/A
    IP address(es)
    Hyper-V Requirements: A hypervisor has been detected. Features required for
    Hyper-V will not be displayed.
    I have a script that runs each HF install.. If I run them manually without the tool I get the same results so it is not the script..
    Installing 95 patches
    for Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter x64
    Repository path: U:\Patch Repository_4_1\2012_R2_HFs\
    1. Windows8.1-KB2894852-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    2. Windows8.1-KB2894856-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    3. Windows8.1-KB2920189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    4. Windows8.1-KB2926765-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    5. Windows8.1-KB2928120-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    6. Windows8.1-KB2931358-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
    7. Windows8.1-KB2931366-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
    8. Windows8.1-KB2933826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    9. Windows8.1-KB2939576-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    10. Windows8.1-KB2953522-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    11. Windows8.1-KB2957151-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    12. Windows8.1-KB2957189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    13. Windows8.1-KB2957689-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    14. Windows8.1-KB2961072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    15. Windows8.1-KB2961887-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    16. Windows8.1-KB2962872-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    17. Windows8.1-KB2964718-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    18. Windows8.1-KB2964736-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    19. Windows8.1-KB2965788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    20. Windows8.1-KB2966072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    21. Windows8.1-KB2966826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    22. Windows8.1-KB2966828-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    23. Windows8.1-KB2971850-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    24. Windows8.1-KB2972213-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    25. Windows8.1-KB2972280-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    26. Windows8.1-KB2973114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    27. Windows8.1-KB2973201-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    28. Windows8.1-KB2973351-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    29. Windows8.1-KB2974008-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    30. Windows8.1-KB2976627-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    31. Windows8.1-KB2976897-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    32. Windows8.1-KB2977292-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    33. Windows8.1-KB2977629-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    34. Windows8.1-KB2978668-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    35. Windows8.1-KB2982794-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    36. Windows8.1-KB2982998-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    37. Windows8.1-KB2987107-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    38. Windows8.1-KB2987114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    39. Windows8.1-KB2988948-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    40. Windows8.1-KB2992611-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    41. Windows8.1-KB2993651-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    42. Windows8.1-KB2993958-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    43. Windows8.1-KB3000061-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    44. Windows8.1-KB3000483-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    45. Windows8.1-KB3000869-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    46. Windows8.1-KB3001237-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    47. Windows8.1-KB3002657-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    48. Windows8.1-KB3002885-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    49. Windows8.1-KB3003057-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    50. Windows8.1-KB3003381-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    51. Windows8.1-KB3003743-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    52. Windows8.1-KB3004150-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    53. Windows8.1-KB3004361-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    54. Windows8.1-KB3004365-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    55. Windows8.1-KB3005607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    56. Windows8.1-KB3006226-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    57. Windows8.1-KB3008923-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    58. Windows8.1-KB3008925-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    59. Windows8.1-KB3010788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    60. Windows8.1-KB3011780-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    61. Windows8.1-KB3013126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    62. Windows8.1-KB3013455-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    63. Windows8.1-KB3014029-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    64. Windows8.1-KB3018943-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    65. Windows8.1-KB3019215-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    66. Windows8.1-KB3019978-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    67. Windows8.1-KB3020393-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    68. Windows8.1-KB3021674-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    69. Windows8.1-KB3021952-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    70. Windows8.1-KB3023607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    71. Windows8.1-KB3036197-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    72. Windows8.1-KB3021953-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    73. Windows8.1-KB3022777-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    74. Windows8.1-KB3023266-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    75. Windows8.1-KB3023562-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    76. Windows8.1-KB3024663-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    77. Windows8.1-KB3029944-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    78. Windows8.1-KB3030377-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    79. Windows8.1-KB3031432-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    80. Windows8.1-KB3032323-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    81. Windows8.1-KB3032359-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    82. Windows8.1-KB3040335-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    83. Windows8.1-KB3033408-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    84. Windows8.1-KB3033889-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    85. Windows8.1-KB3034196-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    86. Windows8.1-KB3034344-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    87. Windows8.1-KB3035017-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    88. Windows8.1-KB3035034-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    89. Windows8.1-KB3035126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    90. Windows8.1-KB3035131-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    91. Windows8.1-KB3035132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    92. Windows8.1-KB3037634-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    93. Windows8.1-KB3039066-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    94. Windows8.1-KB3044132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    95. Windows8.1-KB3046049-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    Thanks,
    Dave
    

    Hi Dave,
    Would you please check CBS lg file and other relevant event logs if find more clues? On current situation, please refer to following article and check if can help you.
    Update is not applicable to your computer- but it is
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Windows Firewall issue, Inbound rule opend all, still not the same as turning off

    This is Windows Firewall issue on Windows 8.1 Pro. 
    Backup Exec server cannot expand a computer node in selection list. I drill down to Microsoft Windows Network/Domain/Computers, then when I tried to expand a Windows 8.1 Pro computer node, it hangs out. 
    I narrowed this problem to Windows firewall related issue on Windows 8.1 Pro computer. 
    When I turn off Windows Firewall on Domain profile, Backup Exec Selection expands the computer node of the Windows 8.1 Pro computer. So, I created an inbound rule opening all to BAckup Exec server as following, but it's still not the same as turning off
    Windows firewall specifically on Windows 8.1 Pro computer;
    Any Local IP address, Any Remote IP address, Any port, Any protocol, All Interface, All Programs and Services, All profiles(Domain, Private, Public)
    And there are no rules blocking any which may override the above rule. 
    Ethernet on Windows 8.1 Pro computer shows profile is linked with Domain, but just to make it work, I selected all profiles.
    Even though I opened all available in inbound rule, it's still not the same as turning off windows firewall. Why am I missing? 

    It looks as something related to RPC(UDP 135), but even when inbound rule is all open, why it matters? RPC seems working fine only when firewall is turned off on domain profile. 
    Protocol 17 is UDP
    Port: 135
    ===============================
    Event ID 5152
    The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
    Application Information:
    Process ID:
    0
    Application Name:
    Network Information:
    Direction:
    Outbound
    Source Address:
    192.168.1.120
    Source Port:
    0
    Destination Address:
    192.168.1.11
    Destination Port:
    0
    Protocol:
    1
    Filter Information:
    Filter Run-Time ID:
    245836
    Layer Name:
    ICMP Error
    Layer Run-Time ID:
    32
    The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
    Application Information:
    Process ID:
    0
    Application Name:
    Network Information:
    Direction:
    Inbound
    Source Address:
    192.168.1.11
    Source Port:
    35341
    Destination Address:
    192.168.1.120
    Destination Port:
    135
    Protocol:
    17
    Filter Information:
    Filter Run-Time ID:
    245834
    Layer Name:
    Transport
    Layer Run-Time ID:
    13

  • Question: Inbound Rules on Secondary EthIF

    Good Morning,
    Please note the following:
    - Trying eliminate my FW as the issue for inbound connectivity issues on FIOS line
    Here is the scenario:
    - Ethif_0 = (Primary ISP)
    - Ethif_3 = (Secondary ISP)
    - All intitial inbound static NAT statements (public to pvt IP) are setup on Eth_0 (see below example):
       Primary ISP ACL and NAT statement --> on Ethif_0
       a) access-list outside_acl extended permit tcp any host 72.x.x.10_ext eq www (primary ISP IP's)
       b) static (inside,outside) tcp 72.x.x.10_ext www int_hostname www netmask 255.255.255.255
       Secondary ISP ACL and NAT statement  --> on Ethif_3
       a) access-list FIOS_access_in extended permit tcp any host 72.x.x.100_ext eq 80 (Secondary ISP IP's)
       b) static (inside,outside) 72.x.x.100_ext int_hostname netmask 255.255.255.255
    Question:
    1. Does the secondary statement looks right?
    2. Why if I am trying to connect to Secondary ISP IP, it does not register at the FW ( /28 IP subnetted)
    3. Also and lastly VZ FioS line only seems to allow the first usable IP to be accessible or pinged (which is the ASA), but every IP after that seem to stop at a device somewhere in Chicago and I am in NY (see traceroute below):
    1
      26
      0
      0
         8.9.232.73
      xe-5-3-0.edge3.dallas1.level3.net 
    2
      0
      0
      0
         4.69.145.76
      ae-2-70.edge2.dallas3.level3.net 
    3
      0
      0
      0
         4.68.62.34
      mci-level3-ae.dallas3.level3.net 
    4
      25
      22
      22
         130.81.17.62
      xe-2-0-3-0.chi01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net 
    5
      Timed out
      Timed out
      Timed out
    6
      Timed out
      Timed out
      Timed out
    7
      Timed out
      Timed out
      Timed out
    8
      Timed out
      Timed out
      Timed out
    Do you guys think that my issue is with Verizon (I pray its not) or do you think that its a configuration issue on my end. I am familiar with ASA but more familiar with Fortigate FW's.
    Also, the goal and or the excercise is to move all inbound translations from Primary ISP IP's to Secondary ISP IP's.
    Please let me know what you think as I have been losing sleep on this matter.
    Thank you

    So you say that on the Secondary ISP interface you can only see  connections coming to the interface IP address of the ASA but no other  Static NAT or Static PAT works on that interface?
    Ans) Yes. No other Static mapping shows up in the logs
    Have you tried changing the Secondary ISP interface to some other IP address from the same subnet and seen if it still works?
    Ans) I have not, but all this would do is configure the Eth with IP does not really address why other IP are not being translated internally. Will try it though.
    Have you by any chance configured "sysopt noproxyarp FIOS"?
    Ans) I will look up this command, but how relative is this command. Never had to use it
    If  you have this could mean that the ASA wouldnt answer to the Secondary  ISPs ARP request for any of other public IPs used in the Static NAT /  Static PAT statements. The "FIOS" interface would still be working since  its configured to an actual physical ASA interface. Or that is my  understanding atleast.
    Ans) Good point. Will check
    I  am kinda wondering the routing setup also. Mainly because you cant have  2 default routes active at the same time. But if the connections are  iniatiated from the Internet through the different ISP, its my  understanding that in this case the ASA should be able to forward the  return traffic from your server through the correct ISP from where the  initial connection came from. Again this is a situation which I dont run  into in my job as we dont handle Dual ISP setups directly on an ASA.
    Ans) The routing is very simple. 2 static routes with different AD's Primary out = Secondary = AD-1. Secondary out = AD-250. Inbound rules and destinations to internal resources are enabled for both ISP's and DNS records primarily point to Primary ISP's.
    Basic setup but not very basic results.
    Thank you

  • RV215W inbound rules with control ip

    Hello,
    I have a  Cisco RV215W and i want to create inbound rule (wan -> lan) with ip control.
    I ha created in "service management" a new service (rsync on 873 start port and and port)
    After i had created a new access rules :
    Action : Always Allow
    Service : Rsync ( a service created in service management)
    Status : enable
    Connection type : inbound (Wan -> Lan)
    source ip : single ip with outdoor serveur
    Destination ip : ip to NAS
    When i connected on outdoor server, i used telnet :
    telnet my_public_ip 873      and i cannot connect my NAS
    when i create a rule in "single port forwarding", my outdoor server can access on my NAS (but all outdoor customer can access on my NAS....)
    Do you have an idea?
    thank a lot per advance

    Hi Bruno, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. You could create an ACL to allow the specific address to the NAS and deny the rest.
    Bellow I will share a Link with a document regarding ACL,
    http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=3707
    http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=3707I hope you find this answer useful
    “Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
    Greetings, 
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • Firewall Inbound Rules - Specific Users/Computers

    Hello,
    I am trying to configure Inbound Rules in a specific way and it's not quite giving me exactly what I want/expected it to do.
    I have two inbound rules as follows:
    RDP - Andy
    Allow connection if secure
    Computers - Andy-PC
    Users - Andy
    RDP - Steve
    Allow connection if secure
    Computers - Steve-PC
    Users - Steve
    Now what I expected to happen was that steve can only connect from steve-pc and andy can only connect from andy-pc, however it seems that steve or andy can connect from either PC. Ideally I only want a specific user to connect from a specific machine, not
    from any machine which I have rules for (I will have several of these rules eventually). is this something Windows Firewall can do or am I asking too much?
    Many thanks
    Steve

    Hi Steve,
    I apologize for my mistakes.
    According to this article below:
    Firewall Rule Properties Page: Users Tab
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759078.aspx
    We can use
    Exceptions section to identify user or group accounts that might be listed in
    Authorized users, possibly because the user or group account is a member of a group, but whose
    network traffic must be blocked by Windows Firewall.
    You can try to add user accounts in the Exception section to see if this works. If this method is not working, try to check if there are any other rules which are overriding
    the new rule.
    In addition, based on my research, there is another way to achieve this through
    User Rights assignment. By assigning the Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services user right on the local machine, you can deny all other users which you don’t want them to access this specific computer, only allow the one
    user you prefer.
    Since User Rights assignment is a
    local security policy, we need to make sure that there is no other high level Group Policy like Domain Policy defined which can conflict with user rights, because once there are conflicts, higher level policies override lower ones.
    Here are some articles below about User Rights:
    Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn221959.aspx
    User Rights Assignment
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn221963.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy

  • Wrt610n wireless network does not work after firmeware upgrade

    Hi
    I just updated my Wrt610n hardware version 1 to the newest firmware, it did finish with sucess, I did factory reset reboot and reconfig. But the wireless network does not work , cant connect computers to it. Did downgrade the firmware to the same it was and restore my settings but still wireless does not work. But router works fine with lan.  Any suggestions? maybe the firmware tosted the router?
    Regards
    Stefan

    Update -
    After last reset and reupgrade with the newest firmware for hardware version 1 I could config the router and connect 2 computers with wireless - but only for about 15 mín - then they lost connection and could not reconnect.
    I did then get the newest update for hardeware version 2 - just to try and upgraded with that and got success, and now I have reset the router again and config it and those 2 computers are connected and have been for 1 hour now. So seems to be working - is it okay to have the firmware for hardware version 2 on my version 1 router?
    Any thought what is going on - could it be that the other firmware had not loaded compleytle or?

  • I fainted and fell while holding my iPad and the screen cracked; it still works fine. It's just cracked. I have had this iPad for less than a year so it is still covered under warranties. Does this apply? If not how much to fix the screen?

    I fainted and fell while holding my iPad and the screen cracked; it still works fine. It's just cracked. I feel horrible, it was a gift from my brother. have had this iPad for less than a year so it is still covered under warranties. Does this apply? If not how much to fix the screen? Please help

    If you want a short list of third party repair options, here you go.
    iPad Repair & Screen Replacement Services
    http://www.ifixyouri.com/16-ipad-repairs
    RepairZoom iPad Repair
    http://www.repairzoom.com/ipad-repair.html
    Mission Repair
    http://www.missionrepair.com/Apple_iPad_Repair_Services_s/431.htm
    iGadgetResQ
    http://www.igadgetresq.com/ipad-repair/

  • Clicking a Paragraph Style Does Not Apply Style to Text

    I just switched from a PC to a brand new MacBook Pro (OSX Lion 10.7), and I bought InDesign CS5.5. I have been using CS4 on a PC for a couple of years and had no issues. For some reason, I cannot apply Paragraph Styles by placing my cursor in the text and clicking the Paragraph style. It highlights the clicked style for a moment, and then de-highlights all the styles, but does not apply any changes. The only way I can apply a Paragraph Style right now is by right clicking the style and selecting "Apply..." from the drop down menu. It's very puzzling. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with this. I also have Microsoft Office: Mac 2011 installed on the laptop if that makes a difference to anyone. Any help would be greatly appreciated, since I typeset and edit for my living, and this problem is slowing me down a bit.

    Neither. Let's say I click into a paragraph. The current style will be highlighted. If I click on another style (or even attempt to re-apply the same style by clicking on it in the styles pane), it momentarily highlights the new style, then flashes a little bar underneath (like the one that shows up if I were to try to re-organize the styles list by dragging a style to a different pace in the styles list), then all the styles become unselected, but no changes have been applied to the paragraph in question. Very definitely not normal. It is almost as if the pane assumes that I am attempting to drag the style even when I am merely clicking on it. Very weird.

  • X does not apply to your selection because it is not inherited...

    Hi
    I'm trying to design a website using HTML and CSS. I have done the basic layout of the website using Div tags. However, the middle column of the website is showing up differently in Dreamweaver compared to on a browser.
    I have researched the problem and found that it is caused by an error occuring on the middle column and the wrapper tag not applying to it: "x does not apply to your selection because it is not inherited. It is applied to an enclosing tag".
    The code for my web page is here:
    http://pastebin.com/DfXLL7Zb
    This is my CSS styles code:
    http://pastebin.com/81u476zE
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Cheers

    This tells me you have unbalanced opening and closing <div> tags somewhere in your document.
    Use the validation tools to check your code.
    Code Validation Tools
    CSS - http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
    HTML - http://validator.w3.org/
    In the web forums, you can mark this discussion as answered.
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists 
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb

  • What is the HP Digital Imaging Monitor? Does it apply to my OS, Windows 7?

    What is the HP Digital Imaging Monitor? Does it apply to my OS, Windows 7? I want to delete the icon from the task tray (tool bar in lower right hand corner of screen) as I never use it.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hi,
    Digital imaging monitor is a part of the HP software that communicates with your HP printer. This program enables you to read the inklevels, get an out of paper message, scan from the unit to the comuter and so on. Its not neccesary, but it will limit the printers use if you remove it.
    Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
    Although I work for HP my posts and replies are my own
    Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

  • Groupwise 7 Rule Name does not display Windows 2008 R2

    Under tools and rules on a windows 2008 R2 server the rule name does not display. Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.

    kdavisb wrote:
    > 2008 R2 server
    I'm pretty sure that the GW7 client is not supported on Windows 2008 R2.
    Danita
    Novell Knowledge Partner
    Upgrading to GroupWise 2012? http://www.caledonia.net/blog/?p=514
    http://www.caledonia.net/gw12upg.html

  • Business rules config does not save to UJP_ELIM and UJP_ELIMH

    Hi folks,
    I completed the configuration of currency translation and the calculation of ultimate ownership in a consolidation application that I am building in BPC 7.5.  I then started to work on the business rules for Consolidation.  These are my findings:
    The first field is called Adjustment ID  on the screen (but it is actually Elim ID in the Elim table and ElimH tables). 
    When I populate this field and save, I get an error message saying "Input rule data does not match the rule name ELIMH.
    When I populate all the fields on the Auto adj defn screen and try to save or try to validate, I get the same error.
    Nothing gets saved to the tables and Both the Elim and Elimh tables have no values in them.
    In 7.0 NW, when I created a new adjustment id and saved, it automatically went and saved it to the database and this was the same in 5.1 as well.
    What am I missing?
    Would very much appreciate any light that you can shed on this.
    Thank you
    Tara Sitaram

    Hi Tara,
    Can you check that your BPC ABAP, BPC .net Server and BPC client are the same service pack?
    Thanks,
    John

Maybe you are looking for