TMG Inbound rule/network does't apply
Hello,
I'm having some issues with my 'non-web server protocol publishing rule' and a Network rule. I'm trying to setup acccess from www to a local ftp.
I've created a rule mentioned above, but this doesn't work, because the 'Network rules do not allow the conn..'
I have following Network rules in place:
1: Source Network (SN): Local host, Destination Network (DN)
All Networks (and Local Host), [route]
2: SN: FTP, DN: External
[nat]
3: SN: External, DN: FTP
[route]
So, in 'my world' there should be access from external Networks to the FTP Network, but still I see connections blocked in the log?
Can I ask for some advice..
best regards
Jesper Vindum, Denmark
Hi,
Actually, it is impossible that the relationship between two networks is the NAT and Route at the same time.
For example, let us assume that there is a customer located in perimeter. This customer access a FTP server depends on the routing relationship between external and perimeter. Meanwhile,
he would like to access the external website which requires relationship between external and perimeter is NAT. At this time, we find something conflict.
Based on
RFC 1918, private IP cannot be routed on internet. So if the IP addresses in perimeter are private IPs and the relationship between external and perimeter is route, customer located in perimeter cannot access internet even if configuration and anything
else is completely right, because ISP would block all the traffic which has a private source IP address.
In addition, if you configure two network rules for the two same object (for example, rule 2 and rule 4 in your sketch), TMG hits the rule which is close the top of the list.
Best Regards
Quan Gu
Similar Messages
-
Windows 7 Firewall - Inbound rule
I am using FileZilla FTP Server, I created (manually) my own inbound rule, but it didn't work, I mean I was not able to access the FTP Server. Then I ran the "Troubleshoot my network" assistant, and it created a new inbound rule in Windows
Firewall, this inbound rule worked perfectly, I was able to access the FTP Server.
Then, I modified the inbound rule created by me to exactly match the inbound rule created by the "Troubleshoot my network" assistant, but still the inbound rule created by me doesn't work.
My question is: Does the "Troubleshoot my network" assistant also modify or create other things? If so, what does it modify or create?
Thank you very muchHi,
We might use the network troubleshooter event logs to take a look at this issue, more details, please check:
Use Network troubleshooter event logs to solve network problems
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support -
MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules)
Can any one tell what this mean ?
MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules) :
is this means that it wont help for datasources for any J2EE application ????
Inactive Connection Timeout
The number of inactive seconds on a reserved connection before WebLogic Server reclaims the connection and releases it back into the connection pool.
You can use the Inactive Connection Timeout feature to reclaim leaked connections - connections that were not explicitly closed by the application. Note that this feature is not intended to be used in place of properly closing connections.
When set to 0, the feature is disabled.
MBean Attribute (Does not apply to application modules) :
JDBCConnectionPoolParamsBean.InactiveConnectionTimeoutSeconds
Minimum value: 0
Maximum value: 2147483647Yes!, they do not apply for any applications they are management interfaces, internal to weblogic.
Below is the brief information about it:
A managed bean (MBean) is a Java bean that provides a Java Management Extensions (JMX) interface. JMX is the J2EE solution for monitoring and managing resources on a network.
BEA WebLogic Server provides a set of MBeans that you can use to configure, monitor, and manage WebLogic Server resources through JMX. This reference document organizes WebLogic Server MBeans into the following categories:
MBeanServer Services, which serve as your entry point into navigating the MBean hierarchies. Some of these MBeans contain attributes and operations for managing changes to WebLogic Server configuration MBeans.
Configuration MBeans, which expose attributes and operations for configuring WebLogic Server resources.
Runtime MBeans, which provide information about the runtime state of its resources.
New MBeans, which have been added in the current release of WebLogic Server. These new MBeans are also listed in other categories in this document (for example, new runtime MBeans are also listed under the Runtime MBeans category).
Deprecated MBeans, which are deprecated in the current release of WebLogic Server. -
Windows Server 2012 R2 - ALL HF's Failing to install as "Does Not Apply to this computer"
Hi,
A general question about hot fix installs.
I have multiple servers that are all Windows 2012 R2. They do not have internet connections, so I have to install the Hotfixes manually. I download the HF's from the ISO download page (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/913086) every month. I collect them and install in a bulk install during a release cycle ( a couple times a year). I just realized that NO HF's have installed since JUNE 2014. Every HF that shows up in WindowsServer2012R2 directory fail to install with a message of "The update is not applicable to your computer". Which is fine if that was true, but.... I get this message for every HF from the ISO's since June 2014. NOT one HF thinks it is applicable to my computer. Could that be the case? No HF's apply to my Server 2012 systems since June of 2014?
This is my system info, and below that is the results from attempting to install 95 HF's.
C:\TEMP>systeminfo
Host Name: MYHOST
OS Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter
OS Version: 6.3.9600 N/A Build 9600
OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
OS Configuration: Member Server
OS Build Type: Multiprocessor Free
Registered Owner: Windows User
Registered Organization:
Product ID: 00252-80025-36226-AA727
Original Install Date: 6/13/2014, 8:04:39 AM
System Boot Time: 3/16/2015, 2:34:45 PM
System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
System Model: PowerEdge R720
System Type: x64-based PC
Processor(s): 2 Processor(s) Installed.
[01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
el ~2500 Mhz
[02]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
el ~2500 Mhz
BIOS Version: Dell Inc. 2.2.2, 1/16/2014
Windows Directory: C:\Windows
System Directory: C:\Windows\system32
Boot Device: \Device\HarddiskVolume1
System Locale: en-us;English (United States)
Input Locale: en-us;English (United States)
Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
Total Physical Memory: 262,099 MB
Available Physical Memory: 249,337 MB
Virtual Memory: Max Size: 301,011 MB
Virtual Memory: Available: 288,015 MB
Virtual Memory: In Use: 12,996 MB
Page File Location(s): C:\pagefile.sys
Domain: mydomain.sgn
Logon Server: \\MYHOST
Hotfix(s): 25 Hotfix(s) Installed.
[01]: KB2862152
[02]: KB2868626
[03]: KB2876331
[04]: KB2888505
[05]: KB2892074
[06]: KB2893294
[07]: KB2893984
[08]: KB2898785
[09]: KB2898868
[10]: KB2898871
[11]: KB2900986
[12]: KB2901125
[13]: KB2901128
[14]: KB2909210
[15]: KB2909921
[16]: KB2912390
[17]: KB2916036
[18]: KB2919442
[19]: KB2922229
[20]: KB2923392
[21]: KB2925418
[22]: KB2930275
[23]: KB2931358
[24]: KB2931366
[25]: KB2936068
Network Card(s): 6 NIC(s) Installed.
[01]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
D Client)
Connection Name: ISCSI
DHCP Enabled: No
IP address(es)
[01]: 192.168.1.30
[02]: fe80::38c9:e59c:5ac2:e0a1
[02]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
Client)
Connection Name: NIC3
Status: Hardware not present
[03]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
Client)
Connection Name: MGMT
DHCP Enabled: No
IP address(es)
[01]: 7.48.64.32
[02]: 7.48.64.30
[03]: fe80::f14e:9339:9326:c7fd
[04]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
D Client)
Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 1_swport_VMRepwan
DHCP Enabled: Yes
DHCP Server: N/A
IP address(es)
[05]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
D Client)
Connection Name: NIC2
Status: Hardware not present
[06]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
D Client)
Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 2_swport_VMOpswan
DHCP Enabled: Yes
DHCP Server: N/A
IP address(es)
Hyper-V Requirements: A hypervisor has been detected. Features required for
Hyper-V will not be displayed.
I have a script that runs each HF install.. If I run them manually without the tool I get the same results so it is not the script..
Installing 95 patches
for Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter x64
Repository path: U:\Patch Repository_4_1\2012_R2_HFs\
1. Windows8.1-KB2894852-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
2. Windows8.1-KB2894856-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
3. Windows8.1-KB2920189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
4. Windows8.1-KB2926765-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
5. Windows8.1-KB2928120-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
6. Windows8.1-KB2931358-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
7. Windows8.1-KB2931366-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
8. Windows8.1-KB2933826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
9. Windows8.1-KB2939576-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
10. Windows8.1-KB2953522-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
11. Windows8.1-KB2957151-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
12. Windows8.1-KB2957189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
13. Windows8.1-KB2957689-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
14. Windows8.1-KB2961072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
15. Windows8.1-KB2961887-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
16. Windows8.1-KB2962872-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
17. Windows8.1-KB2964718-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
18. Windows8.1-KB2964736-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
19. Windows8.1-KB2965788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
20. Windows8.1-KB2966072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
21. Windows8.1-KB2966826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
22. Windows8.1-KB2966828-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
23. Windows8.1-KB2971850-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
24. Windows8.1-KB2972213-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
25. Windows8.1-KB2972280-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
26. Windows8.1-KB2973114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
27. Windows8.1-KB2973201-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
28. Windows8.1-KB2973351-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
29. Windows8.1-KB2974008-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
30. Windows8.1-KB2976627-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
31. Windows8.1-KB2976897-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
32. Windows8.1-KB2977292-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
33. Windows8.1-KB2977629-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
34. Windows8.1-KB2978668-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
35. Windows8.1-KB2982794-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
36. Windows8.1-KB2982998-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
37. Windows8.1-KB2987107-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
38. Windows8.1-KB2987114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
39. Windows8.1-KB2988948-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
40. Windows8.1-KB2992611-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
41. Windows8.1-KB2993651-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
42. Windows8.1-KB2993958-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
43. Windows8.1-KB3000061-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
44. Windows8.1-KB3000483-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
45. Windows8.1-KB3000869-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
46. Windows8.1-KB3001237-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
47. Windows8.1-KB3002657-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
48. Windows8.1-KB3002885-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
49. Windows8.1-KB3003057-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
50. Windows8.1-KB3003381-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
51. Windows8.1-KB3003743-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
52. Windows8.1-KB3004150-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
53. Windows8.1-KB3004361-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
54. Windows8.1-KB3004365-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
55. Windows8.1-KB3005607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
56. Windows8.1-KB3006226-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
57. Windows8.1-KB3008923-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
58. Windows8.1-KB3008925-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
59. Windows8.1-KB3010788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
60. Windows8.1-KB3011780-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
61. Windows8.1-KB3013126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
62. Windows8.1-KB3013455-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
63. Windows8.1-KB3014029-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
64. Windows8.1-KB3018943-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
65. Windows8.1-KB3019215-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
66. Windows8.1-KB3019978-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
67. Windows8.1-KB3020393-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
68. Windows8.1-KB3021674-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
69. Windows8.1-KB3021952-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
70. Windows8.1-KB3023607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
71. Windows8.1-KB3036197-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
72. Windows8.1-KB3021953-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
73. Windows8.1-KB3022777-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
74. Windows8.1-KB3023266-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
75. Windows8.1-KB3023562-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
76. Windows8.1-KB3024663-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
77. Windows8.1-KB3029944-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
78. Windows8.1-KB3030377-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
79. Windows8.1-KB3031432-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
80. Windows8.1-KB3032323-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
81. Windows8.1-KB3032359-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
82. Windows8.1-KB3040335-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
83. Windows8.1-KB3033408-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
84. Windows8.1-KB3033889-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
85. Windows8.1-KB3034196-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
86. Windows8.1-KB3034344-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
87. Windows8.1-KB3035017-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
88. Windows8.1-KB3035034-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
89. Windows8.1-KB3035126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
90. Windows8.1-KB3035131-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
91. Windows8.1-KB3035132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
92. Windows8.1-KB3037634-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
93. Windows8.1-KB3039066-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
94. Windows8.1-KB3044132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
95. Windows8.1-KB3046049-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
Thanks,
Dave
Hi Dave,
Would you please check CBS lg file and other relevant event logs if find more clues? On current situation, please refer to following article and check if can help you.
Update is not applicable to your computer- but it is
Best regards,
Justin Gu
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected] -
Windows Firewall issue, Inbound rule opend all, still not the same as turning off
This is Windows Firewall issue on Windows 8.1 Pro.
Backup Exec server cannot expand a computer node in selection list. I drill down to Microsoft Windows Network/Domain/Computers, then when I tried to expand a Windows 8.1 Pro computer node, it hangs out.
I narrowed this problem to Windows firewall related issue on Windows 8.1 Pro computer.
When I turn off Windows Firewall on Domain profile, Backup Exec Selection expands the computer node of the Windows 8.1 Pro computer. So, I created an inbound rule opening all to BAckup Exec server as following, but it's still not the same as turning off
Windows firewall specifically on Windows 8.1 Pro computer;
Any Local IP address, Any Remote IP address, Any port, Any protocol, All Interface, All Programs and Services, All profiles(Domain, Private, Public)
And there are no rules blocking any which may override the above rule.
Ethernet on Windows 8.1 Pro computer shows profile is linked with Domain, but just to make it work, I selected all profiles.
Even though I opened all available in inbound rule, it's still not the same as turning off windows firewall. Why am I missing?It looks as something related to RPC(UDP 135), but even when inbound rule is all open, why it matters? RPC seems working fine only when firewall is turned off on domain profile.
Protocol 17 is UDP
Port: 135
===============================
Event ID 5152
The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
Application Information:
Process ID:
0
Application Name:
Network Information:
Direction:
Outbound
Source Address:
192.168.1.120
Source Port:
0
Destination Address:
192.168.1.11
Destination Port:
0
Protocol:
1
Filter Information:
Filter Run-Time ID:
245836
Layer Name:
ICMP Error
Layer Run-Time ID:
32
The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
Application Information:
Process ID:
0
Application Name:
Network Information:
Direction:
Inbound
Source Address:
192.168.1.11
Source Port:
35341
Destination Address:
192.168.1.120
Destination Port:
135
Protocol:
17
Filter Information:
Filter Run-Time ID:
245834
Layer Name:
Transport
Layer Run-Time ID:
13 -
Question: Inbound Rules on Secondary EthIF
Good Morning,
Please note the following:
- Trying eliminate my FW as the issue for inbound connectivity issues on FIOS line
Here is the scenario:
- Ethif_0 = (Primary ISP)
- Ethif_3 = (Secondary ISP)
- All intitial inbound static NAT statements (public to pvt IP) are setup on Eth_0 (see below example):
Primary ISP ACL and NAT statement --> on Ethif_0
a) access-list outside_acl extended permit tcp any host 72.x.x.10_ext eq www (primary ISP IP's)
b) static (inside,outside) tcp 72.x.x.10_ext www int_hostname www netmask 255.255.255.255
Secondary ISP ACL and NAT statement --> on Ethif_3
a) access-list FIOS_access_in extended permit tcp any host 72.x.x.100_ext eq 80 (Secondary ISP IP's)
b) static (inside,outside) 72.x.x.100_ext int_hostname netmask 255.255.255.255
Question:
1. Does the secondary statement looks right?
2. Why if I am trying to connect to Secondary ISP IP, it does not register at the FW ( /28 IP subnetted)
3. Also and lastly VZ FioS line only seems to allow the first usable IP to be accessible or pinged (which is the ASA), but every IP after that seem to stop at a device somewhere in Chicago and I am in NY (see traceroute below):
1
26
0
0
8.9.232.73
xe-5-3-0.edge3.dallas1.level3.net
2
0
0
0
4.69.145.76
ae-2-70.edge2.dallas3.level3.net
3
0
0
0
4.68.62.34
mci-level3-ae.dallas3.level3.net
4
25
22
22
130.81.17.62
xe-2-0-3-0.chi01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net
5
Timed out
Timed out
Timed out
6
Timed out
Timed out
Timed out
7
Timed out
Timed out
Timed out
8
Timed out
Timed out
Timed out
Do you guys think that my issue is with Verizon (I pray its not) or do you think that its a configuration issue on my end. I am familiar with ASA but more familiar with Fortigate FW's.
Also, the goal and or the excercise is to move all inbound translations from Primary ISP IP's to Secondary ISP IP's.
Please let me know what you think as I have been losing sleep on this matter.
Thank youSo you say that on the Secondary ISP interface you can only see connections coming to the interface IP address of the ASA but no other Static NAT or Static PAT works on that interface?
Ans) Yes. No other Static mapping shows up in the logs
Have you tried changing the Secondary ISP interface to some other IP address from the same subnet and seen if it still works?
Ans) I have not, but all this would do is configure the Eth with IP does not really address why other IP are not being translated internally. Will try it though.
Have you by any chance configured "sysopt noproxyarp FIOS"?
Ans) I will look up this command, but how relative is this command. Never had to use it
If you have this could mean that the ASA wouldnt answer to the Secondary ISPs ARP request for any of other public IPs used in the Static NAT / Static PAT statements. The "FIOS" interface would still be working since its configured to an actual physical ASA interface. Or that is my understanding atleast.
Ans) Good point. Will check
I am kinda wondering the routing setup also. Mainly because you cant have 2 default routes active at the same time. But if the connections are iniatiated from the Internet through the different ISP, its my understanding that in this case the ASA should be able to forward the return traffic from your server through the correct ISP from where the initial connection came from. Again this is a situation which I dont run into in my job as we dont handle Dual ISP setups directly on an ASA.
Ans) The routing is very simple. 2 static routes with different AD's Primary out = Secondary = AD-1. Secondary out = AD-250. Inbound rules and destinations to internal resources are enabled for both ISP's and DNS records primarily point to Primary ISP's.
Basic setup but not very basic results.
Thank you -
RV215W inbound rules with control ip
Hello,
I have a Cisco RV215W and i want to create inbound rule (wan -> lan) with ip control.
I ha created in "service management" a new service (rsync on 873 start port and and port)
After i had created a new access rules :
Action : Always Allow
Service : Rsync ( a service created in service management)
Status : enable
Connection type : inbound (Wan -> Lan)
source ip : single ip with outdoor serveur
Destination ip : ip to NAS
When i connected on outdoor server, i used telnet :
telnet my_public_ip 873 and i cannot connect my NAS
when i create a rule in "single port forwarding", my outdoor server can access on my NAS (but all outdoor customer can access on my NAS....)
Do you have an idea?
thank a lot per advanceHi Bruno, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. You could create an ACL to allow the specific address to the NAS and deny the rest.
Bellow I will share a Link with a document regarding ACL,
http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=3707
http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=3707I hope you find this answer useful
“Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco Network Support Engineer. -
Firewall Inbound Rules - Specific Users/Computers
Hello,
I am trying to configure Inbound Rules in a specific way and it's not quite giving me exactly what I want/expected it to do.
I have two inbound rules as follows:
RDP - Andy
Allow connection if secure
Computers - Andy-PC
Users - Andy
RDP - Steve
Allow connection if secure
Computers - Steve-PC
Users - Steve
Now what I expected to happen was that steve can only connect from steve-pc and andy can only connect from andy-pc, however it seems that steve or andy can connect from either PC. Ideally I only want a specific user to connect from a specific machine, not
from any machine which I have rules for (I will have several of these rules eventually). is this something Windows Firewall can do or am I asking too much?
Many thanks
SteveHi Steve,
I apologize for my mistakes.
According to this article below:
Firewall Rule Properties Page: Users Tab
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759078.aspx
We can use
Exceptions section to identify user or group accounts that might be listed in
Authorized users, possibly because the user or group account is a member of a group, but whose
network traffic must be blocked by Windows Firewall.
You can try to add user accounts in the Exception section to see if this works. If this method is not working, try to check if there are any other rules which are overriding
the new rule.
In addition, based on my research, there is another way to achieve this through
User Rights assignment. By assigning the Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services user right on the local machine, you can deny all other users which you don’t want them to access this specific computer, only allow the one
user you prefer.
Since User Rights assignment is a
local security policy, we need to make sure that there is no other high level Group Policy like Domain Policy defined which can conflict with user rights, because once there are conflicts, higher level policies override lower ones.
Here are some articles below about User Rights:
Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn221959.aspx
User Rights Assignment
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn221963.aspx
Best Regards,
Amy -
Wrt610n wireless network does not work after firmeware upgrade
Hi
I just updated my Wrt610n hardware version 1 to the newest firmware, it did finish with sucess, I did factory reset reboot and reconfig. But the wireless network does not work , cant connect computers to it. Did downgrade the firmware to the same it was and restore my settings but still wireless does not work. But router works fine with lan. Any suggestions? maybe the firmware tosted the router?
Regards
StefanUpdate -
After last reset and reupgrade with the newest firmware for hardware version 1 I could config the router and connect 2 computers with wireless - but only for about 15 mín - then they lost connection and could not reconnect.
I did then get the newest update for hardeware version 2 - just to try and upgraded with that and got success, and now I have reset the router again and config it and those 2 computers are connected and have been for 1 hour now. So seems to be working - is it okay to have the firmware for hardware version 2 on my version 1 router?
Any thought what is going on - could it be that the other firmware had not loaded compleytle or? -
I fainted and fell while holding my iPad and the screen cracked; it still works fine. It's just cracked. I feel horrible, it was a gift from my brother. have had this iPad for less than a year so it is still covered under warranties. Does this apply? If not how much to fix the screen? Please help
If you want a short list of third party repair options, here you go.
iPad Repair & Screen Replacement Services
http://www.ifixyouri.com/16-ipad-repairs
RepairZoom iPad Repair
http://www.repairzoom.com/ipad-repair.html
Mission Repair
http://www.missionrepair.com/Apple_iPad_Repair_Services_s/431.htm
iGadgetResQ
http://www.igadgetresq.com/ipad-repair/ -
Clicking a Paragraph Style Does Not Apply Style to Text
I just switched from a PC to a brand new MacBook Pro (OSX Lion 10.7), and I bought InDesign CS5.5. I have been using CS4 on a PC for a couple of years and had no issues. For some reason, I cannot apply Paragraph Styles by placing my cursor in the text and clicking the Paragraph style. It highlights the clicked style for a moment, and then de-highlights all the styles, but does not apply any changes. The only way I can apply a Paragraph Style right now is by right clicking the style and selecting "Apply..." from the drop down menu. It's very puzzling. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with this. I also have Microsoft Office: Mac 2011 installed on the laptop if that makes a difference to anyone. Any help would be greatly appreciated, since I typeset and edit for my living, and this problem is slowing me down a bit.
Neither. Let's say I click into a paragraph. The current style will be highlighted. If I click on another style (or even attempt to re-apply the same style by clicking on it in the styles pane), it momentarily highlights the new style, then flashes a little bar underneath (like the one that shows up if I were to try to re-organize the styles list by dragging a style to a different pace in the styles list), then all the styles become unselected, but no changes have been applied to the paragraph in question. Very definitely not normal. It is almost as if the pane assumes that I am attempting to drag the style even when I am merely clicking on it. Very weird.
-
X does not apply to your selection because it is not inherited...
Hi
I'm trying to design a website using HTML and CSS. I have done the basic layout of the website using Div tags. However, the middle column of the website is showing up differently in Dreamweaver compared to on a browser.
I have researched the problem and found that it is caused by an error occuring on the middle column and the wrapper tag not applying to it: "x does not apply to your selection because it is not inherited. It is applied to an enclosing tag".
The code for my web page is here:
http://pastebin.com/DfXLL7Zb
This is my CSS styles code:
http://pastebin.com/81u476zE
Any help would be appreciated.
CheersThis tells me you have unbalanced opening and closing <div> tags somewhere in your document.
Use the validation tools to check your code.
Code Validation Tools
CSS - http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
HTML - http://validator.w3.org/
In the web forums, you can mark this discussion as answered.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb -
What is the HP Digital Imaging Monitor? Does it apply to my OS, Windows 7?
What is the HP Digital Imaging Monitor? Does it apply to my OS, Windows 7? I want to delete the icon from the task tray (tool bar in lower right hand corner of screen) as I never use it.
This question was solved.
View Solution.Hi,
Digital imaging monitor is a part of the HP software that communicates with your HP printer. This program enables you to read the inklevels, get an out of paper message, scan from the unit to the comuter and so on. Its not neccesary, but it will limit the printers use if you remove it.
Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
Although I work for HP my posts and replies are my own
Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution" -
Groupwise 7 Rule Name does not display Windows 2008 R2
Under tools and rules on a windows 2008 R2 server the rule name does not display. Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
kdavisb wrote:
> 2008 R2 server
I'm pretty sure that the GW7 client is not supported on Windows 2008 R2.
Danita
Novell Knowledge Partner
Upgrading to GroupWise 2012? http://www.caledonia.net/blog/?p=514
http://www.caledonia.net/gw12upg.html -
Business rules config does not save to UJP_ELIM and UJP_ELIMH
Hi folks,
I completed the configuration of currency translation and the calculation of ultimate ownership in a consolidation application that I am building in BPC 7.5. I then started to work on the business rules for Consolidation. These are my findings:
The first field is called Adjustment ID on the screen (but it is actually Elim ID in the Elim table and ElimH tables).
When I populate this field and save, I get an error message saying "Input rule data does not match the rule name ELIMH.
When I populate all the fields on the Auto adj defn screen and try to save or try to validate, I get the same error.
Nothing gets saved to the tables and Both the Elim and Elimh tables have no values in them.
In 7.0 NW, when I created a new adjustment id and saved, it automatically went and saved it to the database and this was the same in 5.1 as well.
What am I missing?
Would very much appreciate any light that you can shed on this.
Thank you
Tara SitaramHi Tara,
Can you check that your BPC ABAP, BPC .net Server and BPC client are the same service pack?
Thanks,
John
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to avoid repeat where clause in oracle sql
Hi, Please find my query below, I need a help to avoid duplication of **where** clause in my query. In my below query, **JOIN** condition is same for both the queries and **WHERE** condition also same except this clause "and code.code_name="transacti
-
How to retrieve the Line item Text
Hello, I need to retrieve the Line item Text in the PO (Material PO text). Can anyone provide me a sample code? i need to display this in a smartform. I could not retrive it from the Function Module READ_TEXT. Can any one help me regarding this? Rega
-
Opened up my .mac email today and received a spam email from myself @mac.com. What should I do to fix this?
-
Please help i updated my iphone 4 running iOS 4.3.3 to 5.0.1 and couldn't restore the back up of the older version,but I still have the folder of the older back up in AppleComputer,mobilesync please help !! thanks in advance
-
Why didn't my Mailboxes from Lion import to ML Mail?
I have downloaded and installed Mountain Lion, and my Mailboxes from Lion "Mail" did not import to ML Mail. I tried running Migration Assistant to transfer my Mailboxes from my backup clone of Lion and that did not do it either. Any of