To all the people waiting for the gingerbread update.....

!!!IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!! (and i mean this in the nicest way....)
Here are a few reasons to support this theory:
1. All models of the Droid Incredible are no longer being produced by HTC, they have stopped production
2.If your android incredible is broken destroyed or otherwise out of warrenty assurion is shpping out the DROID INCREDIBLE 2 for a replacement.
3. For months people have asked the same question over and over to both verizon and HTC give out the unreadable grey responses about when and if an update will occur
4. The EVO, THUNDERBOLT, DROID INCREDIBLE 2, AND SEVERAL OTHER DEVICES PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE DROID INCREDIBLE HAVE RECIEVED THE 2.3 UPDATE....
So the only way possible if you want to get android 2.3 is to{edited to comply with Terms of Service}
and use a custom ROM, but again this also has its draw backs since it WILL VOID the manufacters warrenty. SO NOT A GOOD IDEA{edited to comply with Terms of Service}
Option 2 is to upgrade to a new phone but I for one have now and completely lost faith in HTC because of this particular issue with the incredible. This is the first cell phone I have ever had that I have never replace. Any other phone from my past i would go through 2,3,4 phones, and to finally get a phone that is solidlly built makes me happy, and also ntm that HTC states in their response emails to their customers that they are still testing to make sure its compatible. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TESTING HTC THERE ARE ALREADY STABLE VERSIONS OF GB RUNNING ON SOME OF THESE DEVICES AND NTM THE DINC2 IS VERY SIMULAR THE DINC SO WHY WOULDNT THE UPDATE WORK!!!!(and yes overall the dinc 2 is faster by so thank you to those for listening to my ranting and I welcome any counter posts it is just from what I havwe mentioned above and what I have read on the web has lead me to believe these things....Hopefully soon I will have the shiney 4G LTE Samsung Stratosphere come mid september but we can only wait and see....

Owned the Incredible since day one,but after this cold shoulder from Htc. I'm thru with this company.Every phone thats come out later has gingerbread,and the majority of them are junk.The t-bolt has been a nightmare.Besides a few reboots I have'nt had any real issues with my Dinc.Still one of htc best phones but no love from Htc.Even Motorola is updating in timely manner.Htc has to know when you forget past customers you lose future customers.

Similar Messages

My firefox quite often crashes ,with this message"FIREFOX IS NOT RESPONDING" IF YOU CLOSE THE PROGAM YOU MIGHT LOSE INFORMATION. THESE APPEAR UNDERNEATH CLOSE THE PROGAM WAIT FOR THE PROGAM TO RESET, SO HOW DO I FIX THIS

My firefox quite often crashes ,with this message
"FIREFOX IS NOT RESPONDING"
IF YOU CLOSE THE PROGAM YOU MIGHT LOSE INFORMATION.
THESE APPEAR UNDERNEATH >CLOSE THE PROGAM > WAIT FOR THE PROGAM TO RESET, SO HOW DO I FIX THIS

See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_crashes
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs

Stuck on Access Anywhere set up with the wizzard waiting for the domain host to provide the Certificate.

In my setup wizard it is stuck on "wait while your domain certificate request is processed". I added the certificate in the certificate snap in under the computer. It seemed to take it fine. I assume that is the right place for it. Do I need to
do anything at GoDaddy to point the domain to the server? Or does go daddy know to point to the server on Azure from the certificate link? Thank you for any thoughts on how to finalize the Access Anywhere set up.
SLB

Hi,
Firstly, would you please tell me more information about your deployment?
What is the OS version of your Azure VM? Did you create a domain on the Azure VMs? What is the certificate for?
Best regards,
Susie
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Disk Utility "waiting for the drive"

I'll be calling Applecare on this, but would like to know if anyone else has experienced this problem:
I have a 2 month old MBP with the following model Super Drive:
HL-DT-ST DVDRW GSA-S10N (according to System Profiler, it can write to all formats including -R, +R, DL). From another thread, I assume this is an LG?
I decided to test the drive - made a short 40 second movie and created a disk image. Upon opening Disk Utility and inserting a DVD (Verbatim +R), I got the following: "waiting for the drive" for 5 minutes. Ejected the disk and tried again - same result.
On the third try, it actually recognized the DVD, but only gave me the option to burn at 4x or 8x. I usually burn at the slowest speed available (2x), so I cancelled, ejected the disk and tried again. Fourth and fifth tries: no action, just "waiting for the drive".
I then tried to use Toast with the Super Drive; before inserting the disk, I set Toast to burn at 2x, but once I inserted the disk, Toast recognized it, but changed the available burn options to 4x or 8x.
Next I connected my external burner and got the options to burn at 2.4x, 4x, or 8x both in Disk Utility and Toast.
I then used the same disk on my iMac; tried both the Super Drive and my external burner (using both Disk Utility and Toast with both) and got the following burn options:
iMac Super Drive/Disk Utility: 2.4x, 4x, 8x
iMac/external burner/Toast: 2x, 4x, 6x, 8x
There seem to be a couple of issues:
The "waiting for the drive" problem (what could possibly cause this?)
The "non-availability" of a slow burn speed of the Super Drive
And a third problem: this DVD drive is the slowest I've ever experienced; it took 50 seconds for the icon to appear on the desktop after inserting the DVD vs. 7 seconds on the iMac (this is the DVD I burned using Toast/exterbal burner,testing it on a TV and the iMac). It played fine on all three.
Has anyone encountered a similar "waiting for the drive" issue and/or the fact that this drive takes a very long time to recognize/read a DVD?
Appreciate any input!

I spoke with a product specialist at Apple and it was agreed that we'd wait to see if the problem persisted; at that time, we'd talk about getting the drive replaced.

I just want to share my experience or rather terrible experience with apple service.....I am soooo disappointed with the apple customer service at the local store in Tampa......every time they give u an appointment and make people wait for hours......ther

I am soooo disappointed with the apple customer service at the local store in Tampa......every time they give u an appointment and make people wait for hours......there was some cosmetic problems with the screen of my Mac book pro....they replaced it but the computer would not turn on....and btw when I went to pick up my computer the representative handover my computer to another guy without checking his id who was there to pick up his phone.......then I had to take it back second time this time they messed up my iWork...I took it back but they couldn't retrieve my history of purchase of iWork...and then when I installed the iWork at home...none of the applications is working.... .I will have to take is back fourth time.....I loved apple products but may be not anymore.......

Other than what Shotist007's remarks (which solves nothing) your experience is not common. First I would speak to the store manager to get things rectified for you. If that doesn't work out then I would contact AppleCare and speak to a customer service representative and complain via that venue.

When syncing my iPad with my computer I keep getting the notice ' waiting for changes to be applied '. What is this all about ?

When syncing my iPad with my computer I keep getting the notice ' waiting for changes to be applied '. What is this all about ?

If everything is working OK, I believe it simply means that the iPad and iTunes are communicating and that any changes that you made to the sync configuration are waiting to go through. If you updated apps on the iPad and they get transferred into iTunes or if you download new songs onto the iPad and they are being transferred into iTunes, any app data that moves back and forth - those would be changes that need to be applied.
If you can't finish the sync and that's why you are asking, can you provide more specific details?

I am in a group chat with like 7 other people who all have smartphones. 6 of the people have iPhones, but the other person has android. I'm wondering if the iMessage works for the other 6, and my text count is only being accounted for by the android.

I am in a group chat with like 7 other people who all have smartphones. 6 of the people have iPhones, but the other person has android. I'm wondering if the iMessage works for the other 6, and my text count is only being accounted for by the android user. I have a monthly limit of 1000 text so I dont want to go over my plan by being in this group if the iMessage doesnt work because of that one android user.

Use the trackpad to scroll, thats what it was designed for. The scroll bars automatically disappear when not being used and will appear if you scroll up or down using the trackpad.
This is a user-to-user forum and most people will post on here if they have problems. You very rarely get people posting to say there update went smooth. The fact is the vast majority of Mountain Lion users will not be experiencing any major problems with the OS, or maybe with apps which are not compatible, but thats hardly Apple's fault if developers don't update their apps.

Should You Buy An iPhone Now, Or Wait For The Next One?

Great article by HuffPost Tech.
The most common thing I get asked whenever I tell anyone I'm a tech writer is some version of the question: "Should I get a new iPhone now, or should I wait until the next one comes out?" It is as though my business card should read not "Technology Writer," and instead "iPhone Psychic"
Not that I am not happy to prognosticate! And in that spirit, here's a look at the questions on everyone's mind: Should I buy an iPhone now? And if not now, when?
First, let me say that I am fascinated by the peculiar kind of panic that I encounter in people I meet who are deciding on a purchase date for their next Apple phone. I call it the iSenberg Uncertainty Principle: Potential iPhone buyers exist in a constant state of anxiety, perpetually worrying that purchasing an iPhone on any given day will mean that they will miss out on the inevitably cooler version with the mind-blowing new features soon down the road. The Cupertino Sword of Damocles constantly dangles over their heads, threatening to pierce them with unhipness and iShame.
Here is one solid piece of advice I can offer to help you avoid the Sword: Do not buy any new iPhone until September. Apple has an annual media conference each September, and every blog with the word 'Mac' in the title is reporting that Steve Jobs is going to do his black turtleneck thing and introduce some kind of new iPhone there. The September Media conference is generally used to present the new iPods, but as All Things Digital reports, Apple plans to "commandeer" the conference for its official iPhone announcement.
Apple is long overdue to release its new iPhone anyway, if history is any indication. Look at this handy little timeline:
June 2007: original iPhone released
June 2008: iPhone 3G released
June 2009: iPhone 3Gs released
June 2010: iPhone 4 released
June 2011: Nothing!
In other words, the 5th generation iPhone is already a month late, so it makes sense that the rumors are swirling. Apple's tardiness can be explained by the fact they've actually already released two iPhones in 2011 -- the Verizon iPhone in February and the unlocked iPhone 4 in June. Their schedule is all screwy, like a traveler trying to get over jet lag. But all signs point to them getting right with a September Apple iPhone release.
So what jaw-dropping new feature will this iPhone boast? We're hearing that the "iPhone 4S," as it is rumored to be called, won't be the dramatic re-imagining that many of us have come to expect with each new iPhone release. Tech blogThis Is My Next thinks that it will be thinner and lighter, and that it will run on a new chip; the New York Times thinks that it will be the same dimensions as the iPhone 4 but that it will be cheaper. Bloomberg agrees with This Is My Next on the chip and adds that the rear-facing camera will upgrade to 8 megapixels from 5 megapixels.
Now, even if you're just a normal, non-geek iPhone user, who doesn't care if the rear-facing camera doubles its megapixel count, or if Apple has changed the manufacturer of its data processors, or whatever, you still need to at least wait for the alleged iPhone announcement, and here's why: if history is any indicator, the introduction of a newer iPhone model is accompanied by a drop in price of older iPhone models. When the iPhone 3GS was announced, the price of the iPhone 3G dropped by $100; when the iPhone 4 was announced, the price of an iPhone 3GS also dropped by $100. Even if you know that you're not going to drop $400 on whatever iPhone Apple begins peddling in September, there is no sense in paying more money for an iPhone 4 or 3Gs now when the base price of both seem like locks to drop in two months.
But before we start fantasizing, how can we be so certain that Jobs is even going to announce an iPhone in September if Apple hasn't so much as indicated such a thing? How do we know that all of these rumors weren't just started by lonely nerds like me and my co-workers emailing each other from our mother's basements, inciting iPhone rumors all on our own?
Well, first of all, I don't live with my mother; and second of all, the new iPhone rumors have sprung forth from two reliable sources held in high journalistic regard.
The first is esteemed, award-winning tech journalist John Paczkowski of All Things Digital, who blazed iPhone prognostication trails by predicting back in April that an updated iPhone 4 would be unveiled at the September Apple music Conference and has steadfastly maintained the claim is true through June and into July. In fact, he confirmed as recently as July 5 that a shiny new iPhone looked to be in the early stages of supply chain production, and that people close to the company still believe that the new iPhone would be ready for the Jobs treatment in September.
So there is Reliable Source One.
Reliable Source Number Two is the Wall Street Journal, not exactly a one-laptop operation. The paper gives "the end of September" as a target launch date, which squares up with both Paczkowski's prediction of a September announcement and release. This doesn't even mention This Is My Next's separate prediction of a September release, nor 9to5Mac reporting that there are going to be two new iPhones in September, one low-end and high-end. But now we're falling down the rabbit hole and into the basement again, so let's focus:
There is likely to be a new iPhone in September. It will likely affect the price of all the other iPhones. The iPhones available now -- the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3Gs -- will probably be cheaper in two months. Unless you drop your current iPhone in a pool, a bathtub or a volcano, do not buy an iPhone until Steve Jobs opens his beautiful brilliant mouth at the Apple conference in early September. When the post-turtleneckian dust settles, we'll have a clearer picture of whether or not this rumored new iPhone is worth the money. And then we can talk about--well, whether or not you should buy an iPhone now, or wait until the next one comes out.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/12/iphone-release-5-september_n_896345.html

Apple has two prototypes out testing now. One is a thinner totally redesigned case. The problem with it is that Foxconn can't seem to build it. Hence the delay. The other prototype uses the existing case, but with updated (read dual core) internals. If they can get production up by September the first phone will be released and will be the iPhone 5. If they cannot, then the second prototype will be released as the iPhone 4GS.

Get a Samsung HDTV and ATV or wait for the latest model?

A newbie to HDTV, video and ATV.
I have almost decided to buy the Samsung 50" plasma HDTV PN50A650. But have discovered that Samsung has a new model PN50A760 with added capabilities for playing video and wireless networking.
Connectivity is an issue to me. Spending all the green on a HDTV, I do not want it to be obsolete in 4 years. What if I get a digital camcorder? Or Apple introduces a flat-rate movie-rental scheme? My options:
OPTION A) Wait a few months until the $500 premium for the new model drops.
Some excerpts for reviews of the latest 760 model:
"The 7 series can playback video content stored on a USB device while the 6 series are limited to images and audio."
(Naively, I thought that all HDTVs should be able to play back video.)
"The 7 Series can stream audio, video and pictures over your home network."
"The TV recognizes not only MP3 and JPEG files but also XviD and MPEG4 files to enjoy video playback."
"The TV can also reach out to your home network and play back photos, videos and music stored on networked computers. You'll need to install special software, included with the TV, onto your PC." This could be some very basic software. Suitable for Macs?
"While this feature seems pretty cool, it's not as good as similar functionality built into a PS3 or an Xbox 360, let alone that of a dedicated network media streamer like Apple TV. Despite being billed as DLNA-compliant, the TV won't play nice with DLNA server software like Windows Media Player 11 or TVersity, so you're stuck with the included proprietary software. Samsung's software is basic..." (Compatibility with Macs?)
OPTION B) Buy the older model and then, add ATV. The total cost will be less and I think, the video playback (through my iMac?) and networking capabilities (2Wire Wi-Fi) will be much better. But I see there have been problems between ATV and Samsung HDTV.
Isn't the combo with ATV a much more capable and flexible (and cheaper) long-term solution? Which Samsung is unlikely to match?
Thanks for your valuable advice! (Urgent for the X-Mas season!)

Winston, I think you're missing my points:
1) If you're interested in a device for watching HD video, then you can compare the AppleTV and Blu-Ray. You then have to look at what other features they provide, or don't provide as the case may be, and decide. I was just giving my opinion on an alternative.
2) There was no detailed information given as to what the streaming capabilities were and so I was giving my opinion again.
To say that there is little difference quality wise between current HD broadcasts (even if some are 1440x1080i) and the maximum output of the AppleTV at 1280x720 shows a total lack of experience on your part of watching HD broadcasts on a TV capable of 1920x1080, or a lack of appreciation of the better detail contained in the picture. It's like comparing AppleTV HD at 1280x720 with DVD PAL native resolution of 720x576 and saying there is little difference quality wise. But then if you look at the US market where 30fps is standard, the AppleTV cannot support resolutions higher than 960x540, and then you really are lowering the benefits of the AppleTV over DVD quality, and the difference between the AppleTV and HD broadcasts is even bigger.
I have compared video from HD broadcast at 1920x1080 with the same video converted down to 1280x720 on the AppleTV, and the loss of detail is noticeable, especially when watching on a 40" TV, not an uncommon size these days with them being used with games consoles. Before you comment, no it is nothing to do with how I convert them, there is just physically far fewer pixels available. I much prefer watching 1920x1080 through my Media PC than watching 1280x720 through my AppleTV.
Also, as we all know it happens, there is software available freely on the internet - no names will be mentioned - that allow the convertion of movies from DVD to a PC, and likewise from HD-DVD and Blu-Ray to a PC. So reality is that it's available now and with the cost of 1TB and 1.5TB HDDs so cheap, the potential for a 1920x1080 resolution video collection for playing on a 1920x1080 TV is already there. Saying it's not going to happen 'any time soon' is rediculous as it's already happening, albeit quietly, especially as talk of how to do such things is not allowed on this forum.
You keep using this phrase 'any time soon' without quantifying it. You use words like 'unlikely'. We live in a fast changing world. The world of televisions has changed dramatically in the last two years, whereby nearly all mid-priced TVs (both plasma and lcd) from about £800 GBP upwards now support native 1920x1080. Two years ago I paid over £1500 GBP for a 37" plasma supporting native 1024x720. You can now buy Sony OLED 11" TVs, which a couple of years ago were just being shown off as prototypes. In my opinion, OLED will blow away lcd and plasma tv sales within 5 years, and in my timescale, that is any time soon.
12 months ago I bought a blu-ray player for a PC, whilst people around me were going for hd-dvd. The format wars was predicted as not going to end 'any time soon' and no one could have forseen that within 6 months the whole blu-ray / hd-dvd argument would be over.
For your information, ABC in the US have been broadcasting in HD for over 10 years.
But as I keep saying Winston, these are my opinions. You're allowed yours and I'm allowed mine.

E61 sync problem: 'Waiting for the mobile phone to...

Setup: Nokia E61 Windows XP Pro w/Service Pack 2 PC Suite 6.80.53.3 Nokia supplied cable.
The body of this has been essentially copied from two other people who've had the same problem. One's problem spontaneously disappeared while the other's was solved by removing the phone's battery for a minute. My problem was not solved by that and I throw it to the group for its collective wisdom.
I have successfully synchronised my Outlook Contacts & Calendar for over a week. Now I can't. On selecting Synchronise Now in the Nokia PC Sync dialog, the blue & green bubbles continue to rotate and the message 'Connecting to E61'continues to flash for some 5 mins. The message then changes to 'Waiting for the mobile phone to send data'. This continues for approx. 3 mins, where upon synchronisation stops and the message Synchronisation Completed appears. However, 0 entries have been updated, despite several updates to contacts. Previously, having pressed the Synchronise Now button, synchronisation would take typically less than a minute and all updates would be transferred OK. I have tried everything I can think of. Included, completely de-pairing the phone from the PC, uninstalling PC Suite, installing again from scratch and re-establishing the connection. The other functions in PC Suite seem to be fine. For example, I can use the file manager to see what's on my phone. At the bottom of the PC Suite page it says that my phone is connected via USB. At the task bar at the bottom of the Windows screen it also shows everything OK. The icon there says"Nokia PC Suite Nokia E61 conected via USB". It's only when I press the synchronize button on PC Suite that the next screen pops up and says that it's trying to connect. Any suggestions to this vexing problem?

try recreating the sync settings from PC Sync, select settings - create bew settings - and run through the wizard. then sync

Anyone waiting for the 6800ultra

If you are waiting for the 6800 ultra, it is more than worth the wait. I just got my pny ultra and it screams. everything i throw at it just gets destroyed. I run everything with everything on. I hope MSI comes out with theres already. If you are waiting, I doubt you will be disappointed. I know i am not.

I just moved out of a large LTE market.. so iPhone 4 would be fine for me. Plus, data plan prices may be a lot higher.
I am just waiting till after the next few weeks of iPhones being sold so I can do my own research and see the problems with the phone and the service/network. I originally said there would be problems and so many people said No there wouldn't because it is just an old phone from AT&T to VZW... But alas, look at all them! And an antenna issue too - the bear hug I believe it's called!
Also, too many people activating, mixed up MEIDs when shipped, and slow network temporarily. Sometimes it pays to NOT be the first, but be the 4 million'th.

Am I worth to wait for the new macbooks with snow leopard?

As the day Apple released the new macbook pro 17. I was considering about If I need to wait for the all macbooks with the new operating system. Because I just heard that Snow leopard will come with a 64 bit. But now leopard just is with 32 bit. Some of people said new macbooks with snow leopard will be different from the old models(2008 late), even the macbook pro 17 2009. Can someone help me? Thanks a lot.

I think if you need a new laptop you can take the plunge. If you have a look on the apple website on the SL page you will note the following text near the bottom:
+Benchmark based on the SunSpider JavaScript Performance test on a 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo-based iMac with Mac OS X Snow Leopard and 2GB of RAM.+
That's the sort of specs for a machine that would run the OS well...I think the new 17" MB Pro is well within that ballpark.

Waiting for the previously running task to complete issue

I am running the full extract process , and one task SDE_ORA_InventoryProductDimension running for 18 hours and its status is "Waiting for the previously running task to complete"
but all running tasked are completed and left tasks are queued by this task, so what make this issue happen?
I restart the informatica server and the task running now!
but for this task I run before it has ten million records , and it always make the dataware house server's cache full and server down,
so how to handle this problem?
Edited by: Yu Yang on Apr 16, 2013 4:58 AM

Check if /*+ FULL(PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F) */ hint existed in the SDE_ORA_INVENTORYPRODUCTDIMENSION_FULL mapping Source qualifier?.
I suggest you to raise an SR and check with your DBA's if they can do something to improve the Performance.
Mark helpfull if it helps.
Regards,
Veeresh Rayan

After installing 11.2.2.3 iPod Classc. is wiped/"dead" (not recognized by iTunes, Win7 find the unit in explorer) and my iPod Touch refuse to comm with iPod interface in the car. Just wait for a iTunes update?

Hi,
I installed 11.2.2.3 2 days ago and have since then not been able to sync my iPod Classic (not recognized by iTunes anymore and alll data has been wiped but show up in Win explorer when in Disk mode with my label on it "Nik's iPod") my old iPod Touch appear to have all data left but doesn't communicate with my car anymore.
Nedless to say none of the other Apple devices in our house will be updated or connected until this is resolved.
Is this related to the iTunes update?
If so should I just wait for a new update to come out that can help me get these things sorted?
I have tried most of the different remedies listed in this forum to no avail and being computer illiterate (not comepletely but anyway) I just want to know if this is a known problem that I can successfully fix with a bit of fiddling or if its time to seek out a genius bar somewhere and get some help.
Nik

Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the help but I am unfortunately still not able to get my iPod Classic to connect. I have tried all the tricks in the article that you linked to.
One thing is that when I reset the iPod (menu and center until the logo pops up) I get a critical error in iTunes and it shuts down. Could that indicate that my problem is with the iTunes installation rather than the iPod?
I have tried to re-install iTunes before but maybe I shpuld give it a go again?
Brgds,
Nik

Please wait for the group policy client - shutting down issues

Hi
I have issues with shutting down machines. When machine is connected to company's LAN everything works fine. However, if machine is connected to VPN - Juniper NC - 1 hour or more it always hangs when it is shutting down. When I shut down the machine
(verbose mode on), first stage is:
Please wait for the system Event Notification service.
This ends exactly
after 3 minutes. Next stage:
Please wait for the group policy client windows 7
...is never timed out (even after few hours). Machine never shuts down.
In Application logs there are always these 4 events when machine is unsuccessfully shutting down:
6005: The winlogon notification subscriber <Sens> is taking long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
4627: The COM+ Event System timed out attempting to fire the Logoff method on event class {D5978650-5B9F-11D1-8DD2-00AA004ABD5E} for publisher and subscriber . The subscriber failed to respond within 180 seconds.
The display name of the subscription is "ISensLogon2". The HRESULT was 80010002.
6006: The winlogon notification subscriber <Sens> took 180 second(s) to handle the notification event (Logoff).
6005: The winlogon notification subscriber <GPClient> is taking long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
Sens is timed out after 3 minutes while there is no 6006 event for GPClient and machine is stuck there for ages (Please wait for the group policy client
stage). I noticed in System logs that machine always hangs if there is this error
5783: The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\server for the domain X is not responsive. The current RPC call from Netlogon on \\machine to \\server has been cancelled.
I made a group policy log and below you can see part of GPSVC log when machine is unsuccessfully shutting down:
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xe58
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Canceling pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Cancelled pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(438.1a04) 21:31:24:327 Waiting for user group policy thread to terminate.
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xe10
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Canceling pending calls
GPSVC(218.c88) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Cancelled pending calls
GPSVC(2d4.9c8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xdcc
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x20cc
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.9c8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0xd90
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.d48) 21:31:24:342 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(218.d48) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(218.1c04) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x525
GPSVC(218.1c04) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x2100
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Entering with event 0x1264
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asyn registration is pending
GPSVC(218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: Exiting with dwStatus = 0x0
I tried with signing out from VPN before shutting down machine, I even switched off WiFi but machine still hung. If i tried to get GP results before shutting down machine it takes ages and it is stuck in "Getting the user name" stage.
Gpupdate /force never updates policy (It stops at Updating Policy...). I tired with installing different hotfixes which did not resolve the issue. I never have any
issues with logging in, no GP scripts are applied when user is logging off or on, no roaming profiles. The only issue is when machine needs to be shut down.
I excluded 1 machine from GP and left it on VPN for a few hours, several times. It always shuts down successfully. I applied GP back one by one and the one which is presumably causing an issue is Avecto which adds admin rights when VPN application
starts (event 100):
Process started with admin rights added to token.
Command Line: "C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Juniper Networks\Setup Client\JuniperSetupClient.exe"
Process Id: 5540
Parent Process Id: 2252
Policy: EA-PrivilegeGuardSettings.UK Policy
Application Group: EA-PrivilegeGuardSettings.Applications Granted Admin Rights
Reason: <None>
File Name: c:\users\User\appdata\roaming\juniper networks\setup client\junipersetupclient.exe
Hash: 27D8463A913A802E555AEEF45717B122249AA993
Certificate: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Description: Juniper Setup Client
Application Type: exe
Product Name: Juniper Setup Client
Product Code: <None>
Upgrade Code: <None>
Product Version: 8.0.6.48695
I guess there is a DNS issues when machine is on VPN which leads that GP cannot be applied / updated. Not sure if or why Avecto would have an impact on this. When machine is trying to shut down it still somehow thinks it is connected to DC. What
I also noticed are several explorer crashes while machine is on VPN.
Does anyone have same issues? All machines are Dell with Juniper NC (VPN).
Thanks,

Hi,
According to event log, Winlogon process takes a long time to handle logoff event. That's to say winlogon process is waiting for response to logoff.
According to your description after, this problem is most probably caused by Avecto. You can try to disable or uninstall it temporarily for test.
To make further troubleshoot with this problem, you can try to use WPT (Windows Performance Tool) to make troubleshoot.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/03/22/troubleshooting-windows-performance-issues-using-the-windows-performance-recorder.aspx
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

To all the people waiting for the gingerbread update.....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for