TO confirmation via RF transaction LM13 (or LM02)

When I want to confirm a TO via RF transaction LM13 (or LM02) an error occurs at destination confirmation (error L3 250 "Storage unit &
cannot be confirmed - see long text").
HUM is activated and it occurs only when there are more than one TO open on the same destination HU (SU).
It is working well via LM03 (RF confirmation by TO) or LT12!!!
If you have any good idea. Thanks to help!!!!.

Hi,
The transaction which you are using is correct, but i am not sure whether you are entering manually the SU No. in the system. If it is thru RF, you need to scan the SU No. after that you will be able to enter the quantity and then can confirm the TO.
If it is HU Managed, it depends whether you have the label based on SUs or HUs. If it is HU No.s you need to considered the HU No.s as the scanning part.
Reward if it helps you.
Aktar

Similar Messages

How to setup to change status line sale order via shipping transaction

Hi all,
When create sale order Qty = 10 and Lot_xx = 10 but i want to reserve qty = 7 and . In this business will be reservation Qty order for jot and lot only
acction plan below 2 case :
Case (1)
Via Release sale order form :
Enter sale order number and check box prior reservation only.
Via Shipping Transaction form :
Line sale order will be slip 2 line
Line 1 status is stage/Pick Confirm Qty = 7
Line 2 status id Redy to Release Qty = 3
Go to ship confirm
---> Line 1 status is Interface
Line 2status is cancle
***** I dont want Line 2 is cancle i want this line backorder. I believe oracle will be can setup option to choose backorder or cancle line sale order after release sale order. But i don't know to setup this.
Case (2)
Via Release sale order form :
Enter sale order number and dont dont check box prior reservation only.
Via Shipping Transaction form :
Line sale order will be slip 2 line
Line 1 status is stage/Pick Confirm Qty = 7 Lot_xx
Line 2 status id stage/Pick Confirm Qty = 3 Lot_yy Automatic select Lot other
******* In face I think when reserve spacific and release sale order will be release Qty = 7 only and Qty = 3 is get backorder. But in face Line Qty = 3 status is stage/pick confirm and seletc Lot_yy, i don't want this and how to best solution.
Best Regards,
Prathana.

You can write a simple pl/sql logic to get the correct org id. I am assuming that you have two responsibilities in the same operating unit and one should default with A and one should default with C. Both use the same order type.
When the resp that is responsible for org A, will have org A from order type.
For resp that is responsible for org C, you can create a pl/sql logic where you read the current responsibility using fnd_profile.value('RESP_ID'). If the resp_id is responsible for C then return organization_id of C.
You can find example code for order line entity for attribute tax code.
Let me know if you need anymore info.
Thanks
Nagamohan

Error when trying to Cancel an invoice document via MR8M Transaction

Greetings Everyone,
l am having an issue when trying to cancel an invoice document via MR8M transaction. It gives me the following error message;
SYSTEM ERROR: error in routine MRM_DRSEG_CR_CREATE
Message no.M8008
Procedure:
Contact your system administrator.
This invoice was related to a check payment. The check has been voided already and there is no clearing document for the accounting document. So, the item remains open. However when l try to reverse, it display the error message above.
Thanks in advance

read notes 449277 and 750455, your solution is probably there.

How to skip the Inbound Delivery while updating LA confirmations via EDI

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement wherein I dont want to create Inbound Delivery automatically when updating the LA (or a copied Conf Cat of LA) confirmation via EDI. When we are using the message type DESADV, LA confirmations are being updated, but simultaneously, the Inbound delivery also being created. My client desires that Inbound Delivery should not happen and only LA confirmation should be updated via EDI.
Is there anyway, by which we can skip the Inbound Delivery while updating the LA confirmations in the PO?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Radha Krishna

Hi Prabhaharan,
Thanks for your quick response.
My requirement is to have both AB and LA confirmations. I have included these two in a new the conf control So, your suggestion will not work.
Is there any other way out to fulfill my requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Radha Krishna

Vendor Confirmation via EDI

Hi
I am analising different possibilities to implement vendor confirmation via EDI?
Which Idoc - message type is suitable for Shipping Notification from vednor?
Is Inbound delivery created after Shipp. Notif comes to ERP?
What might be scenarios related to Purchase Order Confirmations.
ERP part only is my interest.
Thanks for hints
Mariusz

You can use Idoc message type DESADV to get confirmations from vendor.As soon as you get vendor confirmations through EDI system coverts to into inbound delivery.
If you are looking inbound delivery then you can use vendor confirmations.
Edited by: Sridhar Jayavarapu on Feb 24, 2011 5:32 PM

Facing problem while tranporting number ranges via OONR transaction

Hi Experts,
Facing problem while tranporting number ranges via OONR transaction from Development to Quality.
We have different number ranges for plan version.
And in the table T77S0 : NUMRG COMP
We have value maintained as space.
Please advice.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
IFF

Hi IFF,
What is the error you're getting?
Can you please elaborate a little bit?
Regards,
Dilek

Start/Stop a tablespace via SAP transaction

Dear All,
I'm just wondering about start/stop a tablespace via SAP transactions. Is it possible? At the moment i'm working on SAP Netweaver (DB Server:DB2 8.1/z/os 1.7, AS:AIX 5.2).
Many thanks for your help.
Regards,

Thanks Thomas for the fast answer!
Starting right now to write my commands
Best regards,
Andrea

Vendor confirmation via EDI treated differently by MRP than Manually enterd

I have a strange situation with MRP.
I have a schedule agreement with the following information.
Date          Delivery sch            vendor confirmation
05/03/07          100                         100
05/10/07          100                         100
05/17/07          100                         100
05/24/07          100                         100
05/31/07          100                         100
06/07/07          100                         100
06/14/07          100                         100
Then I increase my independent requirments on 05/10/07 to 200.
If I have input my vendor confirmation manually via ME38, then MRP will add an additional Schedule line on 05/10/07 as I expected.   However if the vendor confirmations were sent in via idocs/edi then the schedule line is not added until the end of the confirmations.
Does anyone know why MRP would treat these differently based on if the confirmation were manual versus EDI?

It should not be treated saperately by MRP if it is posted manually or via EDI
i can think one thing that
do you have diff confirmaiton category for EDI and diff for manually than it can happen
so just make sure that all the confirmation category which you use is check for MRP relevant or not in
SPRO_MM_Purchasing-conformation-Set Up Confirmation Control-select your EDI confirmation contro key and click on confirmation sequence
and check here that the conf cat is check for MRP or not
if not than check than you will see that MEP will pickup that.

How do I pass SELECT-OPTIONS to another screen via CALL TRANSACTION?

Good day, everyone!
I am writing a program that will be passing PARAMETERS and SELECT-OPTIONS values to another transaction via the CALL TRANSACTION statement. I'm new at this, and I've run into a problem. I have several fields that are defined as SELECT-OPTIONS, like so:
SELECT-OPTIONS so_ccode FOR fkkop-bukrs.
The user may select multiple values, enter a range, exclude certain values, etc. -- the things a SELECT-OPTIONS allows.
But how do I pass all of this to a field on another screen using CALL TRANSACTION when I only have two fields (BDCDATA-FNAM and BDCDATA-FVAL) available to me? That works fine for PARAMETERS, but I can send low/high values, different signs/options, etc. for the SELECT-OPTIONS variables.
Please help!! Points awarded for all helpful answers.
Thank you,
Dave

Don't use CALL TRANSACTION. Use SUBMIT instead.
Rob

Send Mail with "read confirmation" via mapi

Hi!
I will send a E-Mail with a "read confirmation"...
What i mean is that if the Person open the mail that i beome an mail that he open this mail...
Under Outlook 2010 via mapi
I can set a lot of Parameters but i can not find where i can set the "mail-adrress" for the "read
confirmation"
Have anyone a smale sample for me?
VB or C# ?
Best Regards
Bernd

Are you interested in the ReplyRecipients property of the MailItem class which returns
a Recipients collection
that represents all the reply recipient objects for the Outlook item?

070302ex603 Formatting errors when posting via BD87 transaction

Hi experts,
When posting idocs manually via transaction BD87 all users receive "Formatting error in the field BSEG-WRBTR..." or "Formating error in the field BKPF-BUDAT..." regardless of personal user settings. When the same idoc is posted via scheduler it posts without any error. Can anybody help me out in this issue.
Points will be rewarded.
With thanks in advance
Saravanan

Hi
Go to T code ST22. here for the user id in which the dump is generated, click on how to rectify. The system will give you a probable resolution for the problem. In many cases, there would be some key words, on which you need to serach for a suitable note of SAP to resolve the dump. Take the hlp of your ABAPER also
Thanks & Best Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

Performance issues while accessing the Confirm/Goods Services' transaction

Hello
We are using SRM 4.0 , through Enterprise Portal 7.0.
Many of our users are crippled by Performance issues when accessing the Confirm/Goods Services tab( Transaction bbpcf02).
The system simply clocks and would never show the screen.
This problem occurs for some users all the time, and some users for some time.
It's not related to the User's machine as others are able to access it fast using the same machine.
It is also not dependent on the data size (i.e.no . of confirmations created by the user).
We would like to know why only some users are suffering more pronouncedly, and why is this transaction generally slower than all others.
Any directions for finding the Probable cause will be highly rewarded.
Thanks
Kedar

Hi Kedar,
Please go through the following OSS Notes:
Note 610805 - Performance problems in goods receipt
Note 885409 - BBPCF02: The search for confirmation and roles is slow
Note 1258830 - BBPCF02: Display/Process confirmation response time is slow
Thanks,
Pradeep

How to execute a commit and wait via bol transaction context?

Hi All,
Currently a service contract is created via bol objects.
Once all the objects are created, the modify() method is called bol_core instance.
After that, the bol transaction context is assigned and the save() and commit() methods are called.
This works fine, but the commit does not wait for the database to be updated before moving to the next steps.
How can i get something like the 'commit work and wait' statement via the bol transaction context?
would a commit work and wait statement work the same?
regards,
Leng

Hi,
It is a CRM specific issue.
so the code sniplet is:
go_bol_core = cl_crm_bol_core=>get_instance( ).
go_bol_core->load_component_set( 'BT' ).
create factory for BTorder
go_bol_factory = go_bol_core->get_entity_factory( 'BTOrder' ).
gs_param-name = 'PROCESS_TYPE'.
gs_param-value = 'ZSC1'.
APPEND gs_param TO gt_param.
go_btorder ?= go_bol_factory->create( gt_param ).
send changes
go_bol_core->modify( ).
go_transaction_context = go_btorder->get_transaction( ).
    lv_success = go_transaction_context->save( ).
    IF lv_success EQ abap_true.
      go_transaction_context->commit( ).
so after the commit, it does not commit to the db straight away.
i asked a collegue, and i got this:
Using the BOL commit should perform the commit in one of two ways u2013 depending on the how the application (i.e. the GENIL layer has been implemented). It will either do a commit work and wait, or use a local update task and commit work statement. So based on this the update should be synchronous i.e. it should wait for the update to finish. In the case of the one order transaction it basically runs the update in local task.
Basically i don't understand why it is behaving as it is.

BDC via call transaction method

I have a requirement wherin I am supposed to execute transaction FI01 in background.
While I do this, there is a pop-up window displayed for selection of jurisdiction code.I am unable to capture this in background.
Can we capture pop-up window values ?
In foreground, the scenario works fine,since there will be user intervention in this case.
Thanks in advance,

The answer has already been given by Frederic. You have to find out the BDC field names via F1 and technichal help. There you also can find the dynpro numbers and report names. With these parameters you have to fill the bdcdata table in the call transaction command. See
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/de/fa/09714d543b11d1898e0000e8322d00/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/de/fa/09714d543b11d1898e0000e8322d00/frameset.htm</a>
Regards,
Thomas

VALUES not getting passed in t.code 'FMY3' VIA call transaction 'FMY3'

hi guru's,
i have created a ALV report for funds precommitment,when i click the document number,the respective document is not opening
i have coded like this
IF selfield-value IS NOT INITIAL.
        READ TABLE final INDEX selfield-tabindex.
        SET PARAMETER ID: 'KBL' FIELD final-belnr,
                          'KBP' FIELD final-blpos.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'FMY3' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
      ENDIF.
the transaction is called,but with empty value in the field and the document is not opening....please help me with this regard...
    thanks in advance,
regards,
Balaji.S

Hello Venkat.O,
i have a similar problem with the overwrite of the memory ID, when calling transaction FMY3. In the code block you mentioned, the system gets the right value from the memory ID, that i've set before calling the transaction. But i found that after that the system runs in the include LFMFRO01, the code
MODULE init_suppress OUTPUT.
IF status2 = st2_app.                "/Genehmigen/Ablehnen
Lesen aus Memory: wird in WF-Methode 'APPROVE' gefüllt
    IMPORT wfdata TO g_f_wfdata FROM MEMORY ID con_memid_wf.
    IF NOT g_f_wfdata-belnr IS INITIAL.
      IF g_f_wfdata-blpos = space.
        g_f_wfdata-blpos = con_initial_blpos.
      ENDIF.
      kbld-belnr = g_f_wfdata-belnr.
and here the system gets the memory of the last document created and overwrites the selecion-screen field KBLD-BELNR with that value. And the value i had stored in the parameter ID 'MRV', and that the system gets it right in the code you show, is overwritten..
This seems like a bug from SAP, don't you think?
This way the system will always show the last doc. when calling transaction, after setting a parameter ID..

TO confirmation via RF transaction LM13 (or LM02)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for