To Logic 7.2 or Not to Logic 7.2...

I just received my copy of Logic Pro 7.2 in the mail. And...I'm a little concerned about installing. From what I've read on this forum, the least that will happen is I'm going to lose the expander, and that got me wondering...am I going to lose any of my WAVES plugins, or my AmpliTube? Maybe it's better to just sit on this upgrade until the next one comes out and install both at the same time? What is the general consensus with this issue?
G4 (Mirror)   Mac OS X (10.4.5)   dual 1G processor, 1.25G RAM, digi 002, Logic Pro 7.1.1, Waves Platinum Bundle

I figure it's usually best to upgrade when you can, and when it's cheap. Also, once a new version comes out, developers begin working on things for the new version, and before you know it your version is obsolete and you can't get all the new cool toys that the other kids have because you didn't upgrade...
I still don't know if I'll be installing this upgrade tomorrow or next month, or in a couple months, though, because I'm hoping some other folks chime in and voice their opinion. So how about it guys n gals? Are you installing 7.2 or are you waiting for 7.2.1?
G4 (Mirror)   Mac OS X (10.4.5)   dual 1G processor, 1.25G RAM, digi 002, Logic Pro 7.1.1, Waves Platinum Bundle

Similar Messages

  • An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying post goods receipt in EWM system in a simple inbound delivery process. It is not getting posted back in ECC. I have my RFC connection setup properly(I assume since I was able to transfer inbound delivery to EWM in first place).It seems some setting related to Outbound queue in EWM is missing.Can anyone tell me in detail what settings are required?Is it something to do with WE20 transaction?I am not sure what settings should be done there.The error log is as below-
    An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system
    SB3CLNT011
    Message No. B1550
    Diagnosis
    An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system SB3CLNT011.
    This could not be done in this case. SB3CLNT011 is not your local logical system
    and this system is not included in the relevant Customizing tables.
    Procedure
    Check:
    RFC
    destination
    Port
    definitions
    oubound partner profile of
    message type SYNCH for this logical system
    Regards,
    Khushboo

    Hi Oritra and Suraj,
    I have checked remote connection in SM59 for both the logical system.It works fine.I understand this is more of a technical issue,but I don't have A local basis team to help me so reaching out to experts here.Can you guide me what technical settings could be checked for EWM-->ECC connection?When I execute BD82 for SB3CLNT011 it shows me green status with message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model".
    Although when I do this for EWM logical system SB3CLNT012 it shows me this with all green status-
    System SB3CLNT011 as a partner type already exists
    System SB3CLNT012 as a partner type already exists
    Port A000000018 with RFC destination SB3CLNT011 already exists
    Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE01 already
    Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLI
    Outbound parameters for message type SYNCH SYNCHRON already exist
    Am I missing something in WE20?
    Regards,
    Khushboo

  • Creation of A/R Down Payment Invoice  based on Sales Order not logical

    When creating a A/R Down Payment Invoice based on a Sales Order you
    have the option to create multible ones. Which by itself could be
    usefull to create one of 50 % for a certain day and decide they need to
    pay another 25 % at a later date.
    But SBO does not track what already have been posted. Therefore you can
    create a sum more then a 100% without warning or blockage.
    Tested this in SBO 2007 A SP:00 PL:00
    Scenario:
    Sales - AR>Sales Order
    Create and post a Sales Order
    Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
    Create an A/R Down Payment
    Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
    Set DPM to 40%
    Post the A/R Down Payment
    Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
    Create an A/R Down Payment
    Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
    Set DPM to 100%
    Post the A/R Down Payment
    Sales - AR>A/R Down Payment Invoice
    Create an A/R Down Payment
    Select the BP and copy the Sales Order
    Set DPM to 70%
    Post the A/R Down Payment
    Making the total for the Sales Order 210% worth of Down Payment
    Invoices without warning/blocking. I would expected that you would only
    be able to set the rest sum %. For instance first scenario I entered
    60% therefore setting the second Down Payment Invoice to a max of 40%
    Untill you have used up the 100% and you cannot select the Sales Order
    in question..
    If multible users do the same work, SBO doesn't show that it has
    already been done. Same if you forgot you already created it you can
    still create one. Plus sometimes it will happenyou create the Down
    Payment Invoice and not paying attention you create the first one with
    a 100% and later with the intended percentage..

    Hello Petronella,
    you are right that B1 is not checking the total value of DP created from the Sales Order.
    The logic and checking procedure here is only between Sales Order -> Delivery/Invoice.
    DP Invoice is considered as transaction related to document the receipt of the money (parallel to the sales process). Between the moment of basing of DP to Sales Order it is still possibility to adjust Sales Order as there is no posting behind Sales Order.
    The question is what would be a checking  procedure in case that on Sales Order there is based Delivery and DP? What would be the system priority to take into a consideration?
    Regards,
    Martin Slavik
    Regional Solution Manager

  • New MBP logic board and wireless internet does not work anymore

    hi there
    i had to change the logic board in my only 2 years old MBP15". i purchased a new one and put it in by myself (relatively easy task). i still use the same internal HD as this one still works fine, so all data are the same.
    however, the new logic board has obviously a different "identity" from my old one, it came with a sticker which says "ethernet ID 001FF3513E7A" which is different from before. this may be the reason i can still access my wireless network at home, but the self assigned IP address prevents me from connecting to the internet. all settings are as before and it worked always without a problem.
    all settings were "automatic" before (using DHCP), and i use exactly the same settings again, but no success. i have to add that i use a new mac mini in the same network with absolutely identical settings (automatic) and this one receives a free IP address from the router (which is only in the last number different from the router's), but the MBP shows a totally different IP address.
    i could finally fix it switching to "manual" and adding the same IP address the mini is using and just changed the last number, which has to be different from the time capsule i use as wireless device and the mini. like this everything works just fine.
    but why does the mac mini perform everything automatic and the MBP (even with the new ethernet ID - and especially since i connect wireless and not using ethernet) is not able to do so?
    i worry if i want to use the internet in any wifi hot spot i may run into troubles...
    any idea what the difference between these two machines (with identical settings) is?
    thanks and cheers
    george

    Thank you. It didn't work unfortunately :((
    Here are my router's details (Huawei):
    Product name HG655b
    Device ID 00E0FC-21530307237S0B028701
    Hardware version VER.C
    Firmware version V100R001C02B018
    Batch number RWC3P0.010.29066
    Physical address 5C:4C:A9:A5:41:B0
    System up time 0 days 0 hours 15 minutes 56 seconds
    I don't have Mac filtering enabled.
    Now it doesn't even find the wireless network anymore...
    My computer and itouch are connected to WAP, but the iphone could not connect to WAP, but only WEP.
    Any other ideas?
    Thanks a lot!

  • Cannot install Logic from DVD version 9.0.0. because it is not compatible with the latest OS 10.8.3

    As I tried to install Logic 9.0.0 the OS comes out with a message saying that the OS is not compatible with this version of Logic.
    I have Logic conventional DVD Software package.
    How can I get this done?
    Any help, I appreciate!
    Thanks!

    No, the message prevents me from installing.
    Now, I took the App Icon from my Laptop which has the latest Logic Update installed and throw it in my new iMac's Application Folder. It seems to work OK.
    What I havent installed are the Additional Content and all the DVDs that come with Logic.

  • Logical drive partition not showing in Mac OS.

    Hi all,
    I'm rather new to mac OS and am hoping someone could help me out with this problem.
    I've a windows partition (C:) running Vista Ultimate. In it, I had created 'logical drive' which contains a FAT32 (D:)and a NTFS (E:)partition. I'm thinking of using this 'D:' drive to share data between vista and Mac OS. However, when I boot up into Mac OS, both d: and e: drives are not showing (c: showing thought). I went into Terminal and use the 'diskutil list' command, it doesn't show me my D: and E: partition.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks,
    Simon

    MacDrive7 allows 32-bit Windows to access r/w to HFS+.
    There is a Google kit for NTFS.
    I had terrible performance and luck with Paragon Software's NTFS for Mac OS X 6.0 ($30) and would not recommend it.
    If you are willing to start over, clone your Vista. Maybe WinClone or Norton Ghost.
    Reformat your internal drive with Disk Utility after backing up (Apple Disk Utility Restore).
    Don't use BootCamp and create Vista NTFS, FAT32 and Mac OS X. Don't install or restore OS X until AFTER you have Vista installed.
    BootCamp only allows for a 2nd partition and I'm not a fan of its methods and limitations.

  • Logical System Name Not appearing in the Business System

    Hi,
    Initially we had created a Technical system with Client 700 without a "Logical System Name" in SLD. hence the 'logical system name' in 'business system' was also Blank.
    Now, since we are implementing the IDOC to file scenario; we need to maintain the "Logical System Name" in the client and which in turn should reflect in our Business System in SLD.
    Though we maintained the Logical System Name in the Technical System --> Client --> Logical System Name; we are unable to see the same(Logical System Name) in Business System ('Integration' tab)
    Please also note that Business System is of the ROLE: Integration server.
    When we go to business system in SLD ---Integrtaion tab ---Logical System Name -- is still blank.
    Can anyone please help us to update the 'Logical system name' in Business System in SLD?
    Regards,
    Rehan

    Hi Sunil,
    I followed your link till
    Bussiness System -> select your bussiness System -> in Below pane u will find Details of your bussiness system ->amongs the various tabs available select Integration Tab->U will See option for technical system beside that u will see option for change ->click this ->u will be taken to Logical system ->there u define u r logical syatem name and then save the entries.
    When I clicked the option chnage ---> "Change Associated Technical System" appeared, It didn't take me to Logical system.
    But in turn I clicked hyperlink corresponding to Technical systems, it took me to technical system --> clients tab --I have entered the Logical system name.
    When I go back to Business system again its not showing the Logical system name in Integration tab.
    regards,
    rehan

  • Logical System is Not Defined in EBP...

    Hi SAP GURU's,
      Please do Accept My Thanks for Kind Help
      Rendered So far ..
      My issue is whie working wih Accoutn Assignment is EBP ,I Tried to Maintain Logical System ..But system  is throwing Error Massage Logical System is Not Defined in EBP..
      Where as it was Defined and Assigned to the Client
    in the Configuration ...
      The Same thing has been defined in R/3 also ...
      what Could be the Reason..?  ? ?
      Could Any Gentleman through Some light on this
      Suitable Points Assigned for the Right  Answer
       Thansk in Advance
       Adarsh

    Hi,
    Pl define the same logical system names in the Define Back end systems or in the Table
    bbp_backend_dest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Logical System is not appearing in Informer tab to check SOD's

    Hi GRC Experts,
    I have an issue with logical system to run risk analysis.
    I created logical system by following the Config guide, added physical system and generated rules (RAR Configuration>>Logical Systems>>Generate Rule) for that logical system.
    I haven't generated rules for the physical system (RAR Config>>Rule Upload>>Generate Rules) since I dont want more rules to be displayed in the reports.
    However I do not see logical system as an option in Risk Analysis (informer Tab) and Config>>Schedule background job for BAtch Risk Analysis>> under system as well.
    It would be great if any one advice me on this.
    Regards,

    Thanks Chinmaya,
    Yes you are right, I confirmed with a friend (my ex-GRC colleague) of mine as well.
    can't execute sod checks on a logical system - logical systems are only intended to eliminate the need to add the same rule set over and over for the same types of systems
    Regards,
    Ramesh K

  • Logical System is not defined in table SMOF_ERPSH!

    Hi,
    When i am replicating a material group to SRM system, in SMQ2, the error message appears as 'Logical System is not defined in table SMOF_ERPSH!'.
    can any one please let me know why this comes up, i have checked the SMOEAC settings, its fine and the logical system entries are already present in the tabe

    Hi,
    Can you verify all your settings as per note 720819?
    Also under SMOEAC transaction, site attributes for your site type 'CRM' may not have any value. Please define attributes for your SRM RFC destination. Select the correct RFC destination, then click on button 'Get Values'.After doing this, table SMOF_ERPSH should be populated correctly.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Logical Volume Group and Logical Partition not matching up in free space

    I was dual booting Windows 7 and Mountain Lion. Through Disk Utility, I removed the Windows 7 Partition and expanded the HFS+ partition to encompass the entire hard drive. However, the Logical Volume Group does not think that I have that extra free space. The main problem is that I cannot resize my partition. I am wanting to dual boot Ubuntu with this. Any ideas? Any help is appreciated. I will post some screenshots with the details. Furthermore, here are some terminal commands I ran: /dev/disk0
    #: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
    0: GUID_partition_scheme *250.1 GB disk0
    1: EFI 209.7 MB disk0s1
    2: Apple_CoreStorage 249.2 GB disk0s2
    3: Apple_Boot Recovery HD 650.0 MB disk0s3
    /dev/disk1
    #: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
    0: Apple_HFS MAC OS X *248.9 GB disk1 Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
    /dev/disk1 243031288 153028624 89746664 64% 38321154 22436666 63% /
    devfs 189 189 0 100% 655 0 100% /dev
    map -hosts 0 0 0 100% 0 0 100% /net
    map auto_home 0 0 0 100% 0 0 100% /home CoreStorage logical volume groups (1 found)
    |
    +-- Logical Volume Group 52A4D825-B134-4C33-AC8B-39A02BA30522
    =========================================================
    Name: MAC OS X
    Size: 249199587328 B (249.2 GB)
    Free Space: 16777216 B (16.8 MB)
    |
    +-< Physical Volume 6D7A0A36-1D86-4A30-8EB5-755D375369D9
    | ----------------------------------------------------
    | Index: 0
    | Disk: disk0s2
    | Status: Online
    | Size: 249199587328 B (249.2 GB)
    |
    +-> Logical Volume Family FDC4568F-4E25-46AB-885A-CBA6287309B6
    Encryption Status: Unlocked
    Encryption Type: None
    Conversion Status: Converting
    Conversion Direction: backward
    Has Encrypted Extents: Yes
    Fully Secure: No
    Passphrase Required: No
    |
    +-> Logical Volume BB2662B7-58F3-401C-B889-F264D79E68B4
    Disk: disk1
    Status: Online
    Size (Total): 248864038912 B (248.9 GB)
    Size (Converted): 130367356928 B (130.4 GB)
    Revertible: Yes (unlock and decryption required)
    LV Name: MAC OS X
    Volume Name: MAC OS X
    Content Hint: Apple_HFS

    Here is another try via the command line:
    dhcp-10-201-238-248:~ KyleWLawrence$ diskutil coreStorage resizeVolume BB2662B7-58F3-401C-B889-F264D79E68B4 210g
    Started CoreStorage operation
    Checking file system
    Performing live verification
    Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume
    Checking extents overflow file
    Checking catalog file
    Incorrect block count for file 2012.12.11.asl
    (It should be 390 instead of 195)
    Checking multi-linked files
    Checking catalog hierarchy
    Checking extended attributes file
    Checking volume bitmap
    Checking volume information
    Invalid volume free block count
    (It should be 21713521 instead of 21713716)
    The volume MAC OS X was found corrupt and needs to be repaired
    Error: -69845: File system verify or repair failed

  • Logical AND not working in the forum search box

    Logical AND of search terms does not seem to be working in the MSDN forum search box. Example: I go to the Project Customization and Program forum and type the word
    subproject
    in the search box. I get a lot of hits. So now I try to reduce the number of hits by typing
    subproject AND read
    Surprisingly, I now get MORE hits than before.   The same thing happens if I enter
    subproject & read
    Do the MSDN forums not support the standard logical AND combinations of search terms?  If they do support these combinations, what is the syntax?
    Jim
    ...Jim Black

    Cheers, you're welcome.
    There's a thread going in the Suggestions forum with plenty more requests for updates to the search tool. You may want to add your voice there too:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9cf8ad4b-5111-4f84-9809-99cd8f1b7152/make-the-forum-search-tool-useful?forum=suggest
    Don't retire TechNet! -
    (Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)

  • Change selection screen in LDB (KDF logical database - NOT HR)

    Hi All,
    Iu2019d like to use KDF logical database to keep the dynamic selections since user wants to use it but I need to change the selection screen itself. The existing variants for KDF donu2019t meet the user requirements. Some fields I need to hide some add. Like I want to u201Cremoveu201D the field u2018Posting periodu2019 (MONAT) (which is available in dynamic selection screen) and put it on the u201Cmainu201D selection screen.
    Do I need to create my own logical database or there is a way around?
    Could someone give me a practical advice or sample of solution?
    Thanks a lot.

    Thanks Himanshu,
    I did as you suggested but problem is that it does not allow me to hide the whole block.
    I have 3 filelds actually on block KD_0 I need to hide (its from selection screen of KDF logical database.)
      SELECT-OPTIONS: KD_LIFNR FOR LFA1-LIFNR MATCHCODE OBJECT KRED.
      SELECT-OPTIONS: KD_BUKRS    FOR  LFB1-BUKRS.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK KD_0.
    PARAMETERS KD_INDEX AS SEARCH PATTERN FOR TABLE LFA1.
    What I did is below.  I used sp instead of  u201C=u201D since it has many screen for field KD_LIFNR(for frame, text etc).
    And when I did just for KD_LIFNR it was hidden but when I did the same for KD_BUKRS it was not hidden . The field has stars u201C*********u201D in it.
    Same happen with KD_INDEX. The name of the field is hidden but field not and it filled with ********. Do you have any ideas what it can be?
    I debugged it to catch all screen names but no luck
      loop at screen.
        if screen-name cp 'KD_LIFNR' or
        screen-name cp 'KD_BUKRS' or
        screen-name cp 'KD_INDEX' or
        screen-name = '%B000003_BLOCK_1000' or       
        screen-name = 'SSCRTEXTS-FRAME_TEXT' or
        screen-name = 'SSCRTEXTS-MCID_TEXT' or
        screen-name = 'SSCRTEXTS-STRNG_TEXT' or
        screen-name = 'SSCRFIELDS-SEARCH_BTN' or
        screen-name =  '%B025008_BLOCK_1000' or
        screen-name =  '%F021010_1000' or
        screen-name =  'ALCUR' or
        screen-name =  '%F022012_1000' or
        screen-name =  'EXCDT' or
        screen-name = 'SSCRFIELDS-UCOMM'.
          screen-invisible = '1'.
          modify screen.
        endif.
      endloop.

  • ABAP query using logical database KDF is not populating custom fields

    Hi Experts ,
    I created two following queries
    1.       VENDORCATKDF – uses KDF logical database
    2.       VENDORCATLFA1 – uses table = LFA1
    I’m pulling the same information in both queries:
    ·         Vendor Number
    ·         Country
    ·         Vendor Name
    ·         Vendor Category  (custom fields added to LFA1)
    The results for the query that uses the logical database KDF is incorrect.  It doesn’t pull in the flag on the custom field LFA1-ZMRO.   Even though the logical database KDF is made up of the table LFA1 and has these fields. 
    Is there something that can be done – so that all of these “custom” category fields under LFA1 (such as LFA1-ZZMRO) – get pulled into queries – when we use the logical database KDF ?

    Hi,
    I have got the error removed by ensuring that fields from one table are a part of one line ( taking help of ruler) only. But the underlying problem remains, the output is not ALV but List output.
    I do not think having additional fields in the query is reason for this.
    Is it bcoz iI am adjusting the output length of columns to ensure no hierarchical error ?
    Can we not have a query using LDB which is shown as SAP List?
    Regards,
    Garima.

  • Logical Database QNQ not working when creating a query in SQVI

    Hi All,
    When i try creating a Quick Viewer Query using SQVI on Logical Database QNQ, I do not get any output.
    What am i doing wrong? 
    Regards,
    Jr.

    Hi,
    The blank row that you get from your second select statement would appear at the end of the report. Put that statement first and it should be at the top of the first page
    Andy

  • Logical database sdf in custom program not triggering selection screen?

    I added logical Database SDF (screen 905) to a custom program - but the selection screen is not getting triggered.
    Do I have to associate these somewhere?
    Thanks,
    Ven

    HI,
    Declare this statement after the Report Statement in the program.
    TABLES : SKA1, SKB1.
    You will get the selection screen now.

Maybe you are looking for