Tolerance during MIRO / MIGO

Hi,
There are a lot of topics about tolerances, but not for the specific reason which we require. We are a business with lots of raw materials. The materials are weighted on a weightbridge and differences always occur.
So, we create a PO for for instance 500 Tons of Toluene.
At the time of GR, the sea ship is weighted on a weightbridge and for instance we measure 501 tons. We know how to set this up so that the amount of 501 ton is accepted, that is very simpel.
The problem is that our supplier also has a weight bridge system and we want to accept his invoice as long as the difference is smaller than 100 kg.
So, suppose the supplier sends his invoice for 501 050 kg, we want to accept it. How do we do that? Currently, it is being blocked and has to be released via MRBR.
Thanks, Peter

hi,
You can block for the Payment via providing the tolerance in the OMR6...here you can provide the upper as well as lower limit...
Never forget that in invoice the blocks are provided for payments/values/and its % only...
You can also you the stochastic block...in SPRO..here you define the threshold value in the defined currency and its %...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

Base value & excise amount during MRP MIGO & MIRO

Excise base amount & excise values are calulated & put during MRP based MIGO & similar process is again done during MIRO.Can't this duplicacy be avoided.
Hitesh Chaturvedi

Hi
You have to calculate excise base value during MIGO as well as MIRO because both these activities are done by different departments.
Some times the value calculated during MIGO is wrong and is corrected by excise dept during part2 posting in J1IEX as well.
So u cant avoid it doing twice

Using BADI for changing the Profit Center in FI Document during MIRO

Hi,
We have an requirement of changing the profit center in FI/CO Document while doing MIRO which is different than the one which is posted at the time MIGO.The system is not allowing us to do this and the field profit center during MIRO is not changeble mode and the business requirement is to change this through any SAP enhancements or program.
How can I do this ?
Is there is any standard BADI or User Exit is available for this.
Pleease help me in this and will give valuable points.

Hey,
Use the BADI INVOICE_UPDATE and try with this. Otherwise you try to create Enhancement point to implement your code.
Note: Inside BADI we can't change the runtime value. So, try to use enhancement point.
Rewert back for any clarification.
Regards,
Saravanan M

Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting

Hi ,
We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
(i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
best regards, Udo

Wrong excise duty during miro

sap gurus,
our scenario is we capture excise invoice then migo(GR) then post excise invoice and then after that miro.
In many cases we need to change excise duty in j1iex and then we post excise through j1iex. The changes that we do in excise duty should be reflected in miro coz in our case we do miro after j1iex(post). In few cases system is not reflecting correct excise invoice in miro. during miro system is picking excise as is in PO and not the one changed in ji1ex.
And yes we always do miro after excise post(j1iex). Plz tell me the solution.

In Miro,tax amounts will be calculated according to tax code so if you do changes in J1IEX then it wont' be reflected in invoice.
For dealer vendor you need to tick MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab of excise invoice(J1IEX),enter excise base value,
excise duties for capturing,refer it in migo & later post excise invoice.
In MIRO change base amount without excise duties,select ed tax code,now you can see orginal excise duties captured in j1iex will be reflected in MIRO.
Refer note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer

Postings during MIRO reversal

Hi Gurus,
I have created a PO with account assignment (GL).
*During MIGO entries are:*
Acct Assignemnt(GL)   +
GR/IR                         -
*During MIRO:*
GR/IR                        +
Vendor                       -
But during MIRO reversal via MR8M:
Vendor                      + (full amount)
GR/IR                        -   (Partial)
Acct Assignment(GL)   -   (Partial)
Why it hits account assignment (GL) during MIRO reversal?
Please throw some light.
Karthi

Thank you Srinivas.
The entries are like this:
MIGO:
GR/IR                     100
Cons. Account        100
MIRO:
GR/IR                     100
Vendor A/c              100
Reversal of MIRO:
Vendor A/c             100
GR/IR                      30
Cons. Account         70
Please clarify.
Karthi
Edited by: Karthi Paramas on Nov 6, 2008 10:07 AM

Wrong PAyment Term Picked During MIRO

Hello,
I have an issue,
1) I create PO .
2) Then do MIGO and assign DELIVERY NOTE Feild .
3) Then Further I create a MIRO giving DELIVERY NOTE feild as 'PO REFRERNCE' .
NOw During MIRO its picking Wrong PAYMENT TERM.
I checked Vendor master for PAYMENT TERM its maintained properly.
I even checked OBB8 for proper assignment of Payment Terms.
Eg For Vendor -123 Payment Term assigned is '3000'
in PO its picking 3000
but During MIRO it gives Incorrect Value '9000'
Kindly suggest.
Thanks & Regards,

In MRM_PAYMENT_TERM
Payment term feild (ZTERM) is not Export parameter,how can we Use this..
It picks wrong payment term when Delivery note is selected During MIRO for 'PO Reference'
If he uses PO number it gives correct payment term..
Regards,

Vendor downpayment/advance adjust during MIRO

Dear Expats
Our SAP version is E 6.0 EHP 4.0
In our existing system there is no PUSH button available to clear the down payment amount with vendor invoice.
Pls. give the feedback, how can we activate this option to clear the down payment during MIRO
Regards
Tarek

Dear Expats
After activating the business function LOG_MMFI_P2P
We have implemented one note also for execute button
Note : 1610785
Still we are not getting the
1) Execute button in ME2DP T code
2) down payment clearing Tab in MIRO
In Standard operation
In our system
Regards
Tarek H Chy

Excise Part-2 is not getting updated during the MIGO

Dear Experts,
When I am doing GR (MIGO), I am selecting the Excise posting transaction in "Excise" header tab as "Capture & Post Excise Invoice".
But, here after posting the GR, only Part-1 is getting updated. Part-2 is not updating. Moreover, if I try to post the same vendor excise invoice in J1IEX, it is giving the error as " Part-1 not yet posted even though Part-1 is updated. Can any body suggest what is the root cause for the same?
One more thing is, once I select "Only Capture Excise Invoice" during GR, in the normal process Part-1 is updating and I'll be able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. There is no issue. But, I can't be able to post the Part-2 during GR.
Note: I am receiving the goods against with the STO. And, we are paying the customs against with the STO. After paying the Customs Invoice, we are receiving the goods into our manufacturing Plant from logical plant.
Thanks in advance for your action!!!!
Regards,
Satya
Dear

Hi Ashok,
I went through the above note. It explains the causes that why the posting is not happening in J1IEX.
And, as per the solution that is in that note, if we change the status of that excise invoice from 'P' to Blank in the table J_1IEXCHDR, then Vendor excise invoice will be cancelling.
So, I guess this can't resolve my issue. Because, my issue is if I select "Only Capture Excise", the Part-1 is updating in MIGO and I am able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. But, If I select "Capture & Post Ecxise Invoice" in MIGO, then only Part-1 is updating and even I am not able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX also as the status of the Excise Invoice is "Posted".
And, this is happening frequently during MIGO while selecting "Capture & Post Excise". So, I guess the Function Module / BADI which updates the J_1IPART2 is not getting triggered during MIGO. Once it triggers in MIGO, then Part-2 will be posting in GR itself.
Could you please let me know the standard FM / BADI which updates the Excise Invoice Part-2 (J_1IPART2). So that I'll check with my ABAPer whether it is triggering or not during the MIGO.
Thanks,
Satya

Error during MIRO for tax code .

Dear All ,
User is doing MIRO but an error comes as " Tax code V0 does not exist in TAXINN " , here i need to tell u that what had happened that in P.O the material is not charged with any tax , so user have given tax code as V0 , but he had forgotten to maintain cond for BED non cenvatable % so he had made the cond. record in FV11 , Here my querry is that during MIRO the tax code V0 without cond record gives error from where the system is not capable to fetch the data ?
OR is there any check so that in such cond. the error should be like this " No cond record is maintained for V0." instaed of
" Tax code V0 does not existsin TAXINN "
Rgds
sap12

U need the user should assign tax code V0 for non-taxable materials.
Error what it giving is correct. U should assign this V0 to ur tax Procedure TAXINN.
Path to Assign
Spro - IMG - Financial Accounting(New) - FA Global settings - Tax on Sales/ Purchase - Calculation - Taxcodes for Tax-Excempt Sales.
Procedure - TaxCode - Reason
If ur not able to solve the problem, Send me ur requrement clearly.
Subramanian.R

More than one Bank a/c during MIRO.

Hi
The vendor is having more than one bank accounts. By default during MIRO the system is taking a particular account all times.
I want the system to warn me that more than one Bank a/c is available for the vendor. How to set this?
Thanks
Ramprakash.P

Hi,
When you have different banks maintained in your vendor master for the
same vendor, maitain the field 'Partner Bank Type'
(LFBK-BVTYP) with different identifiers A, B and C to identify different
bank accounts.
Later when you do IV in MIRO, Enter the POI / Vendor and
go over to the tab 'Payment' and choose the appropriate 'Part. Bank'
from the drop-down (just below the payment method field). This would
show you the available bank accounts A, B or C.
Cheers
Dheeraj
**points if useful

Problem in VAT Round off during MIRO

Hi Friends,
I having problem in VAT round off during MIRO. We have created PO with excise +VAT. VAT amount has been rounded off. After GRN, we are trying to post the Invoice in MIRO, the VAT amount shows with Decimal.
We are using TAXINN, in the tax pricing proceedure i have mede 17 for call type for VAT condition type. in OB90 we have mede the rounding rule as 100 for currency INR.
When i create the FI direct invoice using the same Tax code it works fine, but having problem in MIRO. I want the decimal should be rounded to the nearest value.
Can any one help me is there any standard set up where we can arrive this?? OR is it required any user exit??
Regards,
Deva

Check whether you can use the user exit function module KR_USER_EXIT_ROUNDOFF
Regards,
SDNer

Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

Dear All,
Need help...I configured the following steps in order to capture freight cost during MIRO. but during MIRO,
the GL account captured/defaulted to freight cost is same as the expense accnt instead of the freight cost account..
eg. Expense -1111
      Freight   -2222
      Vendor - 3333
Created 1 PO and maintain the ff:
PO is 1 line item 1pc=1000
ZFR1 - Condition type for Freight cost = 200
At the time of MIRO ( we dont have GR processing),the screen display 2 line item for the expense and freight cost but the GL account defaulted in the freight cost is same as expense account instead of the freight account. then if do a simulate, the following are the entry (which is wrong)
Vendor   1111                 1200
Expense   3333              1000(-)
Expense   3333                200(-)          * supposed to charge to my freight accnt 2222
below step i configured.
created new condition type ZFR1 (copying std FR1B)
put B- Delivery cost and tick 'Accrual' in the settings
maintain transaction event ZFR and posting key
assigned GL acccount to ZFR
include the condition type ZFR1 in the calculation schema, put ZFR in the field 'accrual'
Appreciate all your advise. many thanks in advance.
Rgds,
She

Hi,
Check your OBYC settings whether you have assigned the correct GL for the new trans Key.
Regards,

Accounting substitution during MIRO

Hello Experts,
I need to define substitution during MIRO
Process is :
When material is received from foreign vendor, exchange rate used is as on the date of mat receipt. But the requirement is to valuate the inventory
with exchange rate prevailing on invoice date (ex rate declaration date)
Currently, system takes difference between invoice date's ex rate and mat receipt date's ex rate to exchange gain/loss.
During MIRO such exchange gain/ loss is posted to, say, account 611400 account
I need to define substitution rule wherein system posts such gain/loss to different GL account,say, 520430. So that exchange gain/loss on only such transaction is readily available for reporting requirement.
How such substitution rule can be defined.
Thanks in advance.
Regards

Hi
Please, see these notes
SAP Note 116250 - MR08/MR8M:Cancellation+exchange rate diffrnces(KDM)
SAP Note 165635 - Documentation: Enhancement LMR1M001 (MM-IV)
SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

During MIRO Condition line item not picking against Delivey Note

Hi,
We create a PO with Entry tax condition type. Problem is....
Case 1: - When we are doing MIRO of this PO, Entry tax condition is showing in line item.
Case 2: - When we are doing MIRO against Delivery Note of related PO, Entry tax condition is not showing in line item...Why???
Note: - During testing we found 2 diff. thing for both case..
1. In Case 1 during MIRO, Variance Type showing values (B & A)...
...........B for Material Line Item.
...........A for Condition Line Item.
2. In Case 2 during MIRO, Variance Type showing value only B..
Please guide..

Hi
Check this thread
MIRO - Tax Code
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Tolerance during MIRO / MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for