Tolerance key DQ in extended Classic scenario give Backen error message

Dear all,
I am using SRM 7.0, SP 9 
Extended Classic Scenario.
I created a tolerance group and attached it to my user via TOG attribute in PPOMA_BBP. Tolerance key is DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
I also set up the ECC tolerances:
- Purchasing Value key with Tol. Overdelivery = 5.0 (in SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Material Master --> Define Purchasing Value Keys)
And assigned that Purchasing Value Key to the material group I am using (via SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> Material Master --> Entry Aids for Items Without a Material Master)
- And I even set up tolerance key B1 (for error message) for my Company Code (in Spro -> MM --> IM and PI --> GR --> Set tolerance limits) with a upper limit of 5%
And even with this set up I still get the error message
u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D
when I try to post a Confirmation with an overdelivery, even if the over delivery is only 0.1% of the total quantity 1000.
What Configuration am I missing?
Cheers
Ulrike

Dear Rahul,
Thanks for you input
Let me give you an example of the behaviour:
in PPOMA_BBP TOG assigned to user has : DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
User orders a PO  with quantity=1000, price $100;
No additional tolerances assigned in the PO itself
User tries to enter confirmation with quantity 1001 (so qty variance converted to currency amount results in $100 over delivery) So the confirmation is under both the 5% and the $1000 limit.
In that case I donu2019t receive an error message from the SRM, but the error message u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D from ECC still prevents me from posting the Confirmation. And this is the problem I havenu2019t been able to solve so far.
So I want the TOG tolerance to be used. And I am also happy with the absolute limit always having priority over percentage limit...
But I am trying to find a way to get rid of the back end message (with assigning a tolerance to the PO itself as the will get rid of the absolute limit see my previous post.)
Cheers
Ulrike

Similar Messages

  • Tolerances in SRM extended classic scenario

    Hi all,
    I have a question regarding tolerances in extended classic scenario and I hope that somebody could help me.
    We use extended classic scenario. The tolerance group is attached to TOG attribute in PPOMA_BBP, tolerance key is DQ.
    We also tried to use tolerance key CF, but it seems as if CF is not applicable for GR?
    However, whenever we try to confirm more than PO quantity, we get an error message. “PO Ordered quantity exceeded by 1 EA“
    It seems so that SRM has a ‘double’ tolerance check
    • one in SRM against defined tolerance (via attribute TOG)
    • one in R/3 against the PO tolerance
    Now my question: Is this the expected behaviour or a bug? We do not want to maintain two tolerances. And furthermore most of the time we have PO’s without a material master. Are there any possibilities to skip the PO tolerance check?
    Thanks for your help,
    Martina
    Edited by: Martina A. on Jan 15, 2008 1:13 PM

    Hi
    Depending on the SRM version you are using, Please go through the links, which will definitely help ->
    Condition Type SRM - ECC
    Tolerance in SRM and ECC (BE R/3)
    Tolerance
    Re: SC Budget check without SAP Fund Mgmt
    TOG parameter and tolerance checks better understanding
    Setting EKPO-UNTTO with BAPI_PO_Create
    Re: SRM: many confirmation for PO
    Please maintain the "TOG" attribute in PPOMABBP transaction in SRM.._
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Payment term key with limit days in Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We have an SRM 4.0 implementation (SRM Server 5.0 with Support Package
    9) using the Extended Classic Scenario.
    When a shopping cart is created, it must be approved, and then a
    purchase order is generated (first locally at SRM, and then is
    replicated to the backend).
    The problem is that the payment term key (field at header level EKKO-
    ZTERM) of the backend purchase order is empty, only in cases when we use a payment term key which have several different values for the
    field "limit days" (T052-ZTAGG in backend, BBP_PAYTERM-ZTAGG in SRM).
    Example:
         ZTERM     ZTAGG
          K180           09
          K180           19
          K180           31
    If the payment term key selected has no several values for the field "limit
    days" (one single entry), the payment term key arrives correctly at the backend purchase order.
    Example:
         ZTERM     ZTAGG
          E000           00
    In SRM table BBP_PAYTERM we have upload the backend payment terms
    (using report BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS). In other threads it is said that you must copy the entries generated by the report with the logical system of the SRM system, but in extended classic scenario it seems to be not necessary.
    We have already implemented note 846009, in order to use always the backend payment term, but the error didn’t get resolved.
    We have our vendor business partners mapped to the local and backend
    purchasing organizations, but it is only necessary indicate the Payment term key for the Backend Purchasing Organization.
    Regards

    hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
    Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
    Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
    <b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
    Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend

    Hi,
    1) Does the PO output (ignoring the config maintained in SRM server 5.5 for the output) through R/3 backend is standard or it is mandatory to give local outputs from SRM only incase of Extended classic scenario?
    Regards,
    DV

    Hi Anil,
    We are working on extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 & ECC6.0.
    Please explain how we can take "PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend ". 
    Please send the related document to [email protected]
    Thanks in advance
    Ashutosh

  • Switch from classic to Extended Classic Scenario- Impact

    Hello,
    We are proposing to switch from Classic to Extended Classic Scenario.
    We are on SRM_SERVER 550,Sp7 and SAP 4.7 backend.
    We want to know if this is technically feasible to switch and have less/no impact on existing transactional data and master data.
    Main concerns are: Existing open Shopping carts and PO's.
    We are also modifying the WF by including buyer completion WF.
    Will the carts created in classic scenario and 'awaiting approval' work similarly in ECS?
    Can we copy old carts (created in classic scenario) into new ones in ECS?
    Are there any other issues like the ones above which people have come across?
    Is there any standard SAP material/Consulting note available
    which gives some guidelines for switching scenarios?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hello,
    You can switch from the classic to the extended classic scenario by making the global settings in the IMG.
    But it would be better if you can decide if only a particular set of categories need ECS.
    If you wish to have both the scenarios,the deciding factor is the product category.
    You can also activate a  BADI for the control of ECS despite the above Global settings.
    Reward if answer is helpful,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Organization structure in extended classic scenario

    Hi All
    I  am trying to configure extended classic scenario on SAP SRM 7.0.  I have made the following settings for the same:
    1. In SPRO->SRM Server-> Technical Basic Settings -> Define backend system from product category, I have specified target system as SRM system and not ECD system
    2. In SPRO->SRM Server->Cross Application Basic Settings-> Activate Extended Classic Scenario, I have selected all the options including "Back end purchasing group responsible"
    I have a few doubts.
    1. In organization Structure (PPOMA_BBP) Comapny code is corresponding to company code in back end but do I have to create local purchasing organization and local purchasing group i.e. in Functions-> Corresponds  I'll have to leave blank. plz suggest
    2. Also is IPC configuration mandatory for extended classic scenario
    Plz give your suggestion on above mentioned issue
    Regards
    Pawan Keshwani
    Edited by: pawankeshwani on Mar 18, 2011 8:33 AM

    Hi Pawan,
    No you should mention Purch Org & Purch Grp also wrt your backend (ECC).
    IPC need not be configured separately from SRM 5.0 onwards. To ascertain if IPC is working fine just run the report : RSVMCRT_HEALTH_CHECK. You should see 4 success messages. Else get in touch with Basis to enable Virtual Machine Container (VMC)
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Use the MM-SUS in Extended Classic Scenario

    HI,my experts :
        The standard function doesn't support the MM-SUS in Extended Classic Scenario .Now I may have two questions about it .
      1、  I have one ECC system .I need handle the invice in the ECC system .In other word ,the invoice rcreated in the SUS should transfer to the MM system .But in EBP-SUS ,the invoice is transfered to the SRM system .What can I do now ?
      2、 If  I  want to use the decoupled scenario ,some POs are create in EBP ,and others are created in MM .Now ,which sus I should select ? EBP-SUS  or MM-SUS?
       Or some detail document about it .
      BR!
       Alex!
    Edited by: Alex on May 25, 2010 9:17 AM

    Khan has explained most of the things.
    The external web service I meant is actually OPI catalog which you need to maintain.
    The same has to be entered in the attribute CAT of the EBP purchaser.
    To maintain the call structure of this catalog
    Get the URL from SE80->BSP appln->ros_prescreen->controller->main.do
    then give the client no of yr ROS client
    the RFC user user ID from EBP to ROS
    it's password
    sap-sessioncmd=open
    sap-language=sy-langu
    the operational purchaser role in EBP (sap_EC_BBP_OP_PURCHASER) should be linked with
    the same in ROS via role menu->business partner->screen supplier->right click->change details
    ->sap-client=ROS client no
    The administrator & op purchaser should be present in ROS org structure also
    & should have same userID & password as EBP
    you have to define the vendor root, the root of the purchasing organization and the currency in
    table BBP_MARKETP_INFO in the SRM System (Enterprise Buyer client).
    BR
    Dinesh

  • Extended Classic Scenario PPOMA_Purchasing Org and Group

    Hi gurus,
    We are working with SRM 5.5 and we are having problems with the assignments for the Purchasing organization and Purchasing groups in the PPOMA.
    In the documentation it says we should have one box for the R3 Purchasing Organization (flagged and referred to the backend POrg) and one for the Local Purchasing Organization (flagged but NOT referred to the backend POrg). The same for the Purchasing Groups, the one under R3 POrg will be flagged and referred to the PGroup in R3 and the one under the Local POrg will have the flag but it will not be referred to the backend PGroup.
    Afterwards, in the attributes for the Local POrg and Local PGroup, with the attributes PURCH_ORGX and PURCH_GRPX the local and the R3 POrg and PGroup will be assigned each other.
    The purchasers will be located in the Local PGroup. The R3 POrg and PGroup will never have users assigned.
    The problem is that all the workflow is only working if the "Local" POrg and Group have the backend purchasing organization and purch group assigned in the Function Tab. This means that the 2 boxes for R3 are no longer necessary. In the documentation it says that this version of SRM needs both boxes for the POrgs and the 2 boxes for the PGroups. We have flagged the Extended Classic Scenario.
    Any help on this? It's because of the version?
    Many thanks and regards,
    I will give Points!

    Hi Ana
    PURCH_GRP     Purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing group in the organizational plan.
    This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as company on the Function tab.
    PURCH_GRPX     R/3 purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing group in the organizational plan. The value contains the ID and the associated backend system of a backend purchasing group.
    This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
    PURCH_ORG      Purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
    This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as purchasing organization on the Function tab.
    PURCH_ORGX     R/3 purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
    This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
    can you elaborate more?
    in ECS also we can map the backend purchase organisation/ purchase group for purchasing activity.
    there might be a resposibilty tab for the backend purchase group might be mapped the responsible purchaser list (dept).plz check it up
    regards
    Muthu
    regards
    Muthu

  • Extended classic scenario local PO Output status

    Hello all ,
    Need some inputs on extended classic scenario local PO Output.
    My requirement is , when ever the put get process successfully in SRM , I need to send a mail to requester saying that u201C for this particular output got processed successfully u201C
    I have business requirement, we need to run this report every 30 min, This report has to pull out the all the PO number from the current time to past 30 min, for the output got processed successfully.
    To meet this requirement, I am using the output log entry table PPFTTRIGG where we can see the all the PO with the status and time stamp also.
    But some how, this table maintaining incorrect time stamp.
    Ex: If I create PO, process the PO output, and if I see the time stamp for this PO, its showing as 10 min before the current time.
    Did anybody come across this issue? Or can anybody suggest me any alternative approach for this.
    I mean is there any function module/ table available, which will give PO Output status also.
    Can you please give me any pointers for this?
    Seeking your help on this.
    Wish you a advance happy new year.
    Thank you.

    Hi Latha,
    Did you have a look at the standard report RSPPFPROCESS. For PO's please pass the below selection screen values along with the appropiate date & time details:
    Application = BBP_PD
    Action Profile = BBP_PD_PO
    Then regarding the time difference, please make sure that the application server time is sync with the actual time of the time-zone. This could also be a reason.
    Then what you can do is to clone the RSPPFPROCESS program and add the email notification logic on that.
    Please have a look at the BADI BBP_PROCESS_PO, this can be of some help for your requirement.
    Hope this solves your problem.
    Regards
    Kathirvel

  • Extended Classic Scenario  - how does the integration work ?

    Hi,
    Apologies for asking a basic question, but we are looking at requirements for integrating SRM with R/3 using the extended classic scenario and I need to understand how the integration actually works ?  How is the data transferred between the 2 systems ?  Does it use BADI's, idocs etc ?
    Many thanks,
    fiona

    Hi Olaf,
    I just wanted to give some precision on what you said (in the thread How to "see" PO in EBP ? also)
    The Extended classic scenario only refers to the local PO creation replicated in R/3.
    In this scenario, in the R/3 PO only the data not managed/sent from the SRM are available for modification (which depends on the SRM version you use)
    The "PR transfer from R/3" is called "Plan driven procurement", and in this scenario only RFC is used, the qRFC are only used for BDocs of the CRM Middleware.
    Regards.
    Vadim

  • Extended classic scenario local PO

    Hi All ,
    Need some inputs on the extended classic scenario local PO.
    There is couple of functionality which we need to do for the PO. I mean when the PO gets created automatically after shopping cart completely approved
    We can change the same PO from the process purchase order also.
    But if I want to map couple of the fields, when PO is getting created automatically how can do that one. And I donu2019t want map these fields when the PO is from the getting changed process purchase order also.
    I am using the BADI, BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI (PO_CHANGE Method) to map these fields.
    The thing is here , this BADI will call even for the automatic PO creation and also for changing the PO .
    Currently when I noticed PO gets created automatically by the user id u201CWF_BATCH u201C , So I am using the same the logic like .
    If sy-uname = WF_BATCH
    Do the mapping part
    Endif,
    But I donu2019t think so; this logic will work all the times.
    Please can anyone give me some pointer for the same, it will be really helpful for me .
    Seeking your help on this
    Thank you,

    Hi Latha,
    This is a bit tricky one. Yes you are vry correct, the logic is not that fool proof, as the PO can be subjected to so many changes back & forth; even approvals can be done after a change is completed etc.
    The other alternative is to go ahead the document version. You can use the function module BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL and the table E_VERSION will contain all the versions of the PO. This should differentiate the change & initial PO verions.
    Hope you can build your logic based on this; this is a better logic on par with the existing one.
    Regards
    Kathirvel

  • Convert classic in extended classic scenario

    hai,
    i wanted to convert classis scenario into extended classic scenario.what are all the steps that i needed to be follow.does it require any implementation of badi?how the po will be sent to the r3 in display mode?
    could anyone give the solution
    Edited by: chakradhar  nannapaneni on May 11, 2009 12:45 PM

    Hi,
    1.     Activate the extended classic scenario
    When the extended classic scenario is set, SRM generates a local purchase order for each item in the shopping cart. All follow-on documents are created in the backend system as well as locally in the SRM
    2.     Activate IPC pricing
    Since SRM 3.5 IPC (Internet Pricing Configurator) pricing is mandatory for extended classic implementations.
    In the classic scenario you can replace the IPC by the simplified pricing
    IMG SRM: Sap Implementation Guide  Supplier Relationship Management SRM Server  Cross-Application Basic Settings  Activate Extended Classic Scenario
    IMG SRM: Sap Implementation Guide  Supplier Relationship Management SRM Server  Business Add-ins for SRM Pricing
    Check whether the BAdIs relevant for the pricing are activated correctly and filled with the correct coding:
    BAdI                                     I            PC Pricing (Extended)          Simplified Pricing (Classic)
    BAdI: BBP_PRICEDATA_READ
    Implementation:. BBP_PRODUCT_PRICE                     Not active         Active
    *BAdI: PRODUCT_UPDATE2
    Implementation. IPC_UPD_PROD_BUFFER2     Active         Not active
    Regards,
    Abraham

  • Classic scenario & Extended classic scenario

    Hi Experts ,
    I am new to SRM ,  Is it possible to combine both classic scenario & Extended classic scenario . if it possible , then how to achieve this .
    Regards
    Vel.

    Hi Vel
    I suggest that instead of checking the possibility of implementing any combined scenario's like how you have asked ( Classic+Extended classic scenario).
    You need to map the Business requirement and how the Business teams wanted to handle the PO ,GR etc and accordingly you have to plan for implementation scenario. You can' customise the standard SRM delivered options for these scenario . I t is advisable to either go for Classic or Extended classic.   But combination of Classic & stand alone scenario is possible.
    for your ready reference i have given below capabilities of all scenarios, which you may already know..
    Key implementation scenarios
    u2022     Classic
    o     Implement EBP and one or more ERP system . All shopping carts refer to MM process in your ERP backend, your   ERP is the leading system. GR (Confirmations and invoices can be entered in Enterprise Buyer or ERP back end system
    u2022     Extended classic
    o     Purchase order is created locally within EBP system , if the data in the shopping cart is insufficient to generate a complete purchase order. The data is supplemented manually within the enterprise buyer system EB is the leading system , GR,IV can be done in both EBP and ERP system.
    u2022     Decoupled
    o     Combination of  classic and standalone scenario ,some items are locally handled, some items are transferred to the ERP back end system
    o     We are able to send PO from both the system.
    u2022     Standalone
    o     Your SC items create local procurement only, this means all the follow on doc like GR,IV will be done at EB system only.
    o     Only commitment & invoice posting will be done at ERP backend
    You can get the final Business requirement and plan.
    Regards
    Narahari

  • Extended classic scenario clarification

    Hello
    I have a question in case of a extended classic scenario.
    Shopping cart is created by a employee and approved by a manager. But still no vendor exists in the shopping cart after approval. Now how the PO is created in SRM.
    Note sourcing is activated, strategic and operational purchasers exits. How the process is implemented. Will the purchasers get informed via work items? Will they get shopping cart work items or incomplete PO work items.
    Could any of you please give clarity on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    Once the shopping cart is created, based on sourcing config and also based on Purchase group responsibility the respective shopping cart flows in to the 'sourcing cockpit'(SOCO). Buyers/Purchasers will see all the open shopping carts and in SOCO there are multiple options available for purchasers to do. Such as creation of PO by just adding the vendor and right price/  creation of Bid or Auction or contract/   group the similiar requirements into one requirement create PO etc.
    If the follow on document is chosen to be a PO or Contract then the shopping cart will go out of the SOCO once the PO/contract created. If at all the SC is considered for Bid/Auction process then the SC remains in SOCO till the Bid/Acution process is completed. Hope this helps
    You can also look at SAP application help for SRM sourcing
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm702/helpdata/EN/d8/33ec56f17f4404806072749f7e764f/frameset.htm
    Rgds/Kiran

  • Extended Classic Scenario Pricing issue, can I over come by using SRM-MDM?.

    Hi SRM GURU'S,
    I am using  ECC 6.0, SRM 5.5, SUS, LAC, cFolders and SRM-MDM with Extended Classic Scenario.
    My Question is : In case of Extended classic scenario, there is issue with Pricing and conditions. Is there any possibility to overcome this issue by using SRM-MDM. Or do I have to go for IPC. My client has not brought IPC. I have to cover Pricing with the above components.
    Anyone suggest me, how to proceed.  Thanks in Advance. Awaiting for quick response.
    Thanks & Regards,
    John.

    Hi Masa,
    We can maintain Price and conditions as a record in CCM for Particular Material or Vendor. When you add that record to shopping cart it will update. I mean, If the provision is available in MDM, I don't want to use the Two components for same functionality.
    If I use IPC, Is there separate license for that. What else need to be updated to use IPC (Patches etc).
    If you have IPC configuration material, could you please share with me? How to bridge the SRM Conditions and ECC Conditions?
    Please clearly give me details.  I really appreciate you.
    Regards,
    John.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Where can I purchase a longer cord than the one provided?

    When I had my Uverse installed, I wanted it on 1 wall. The installer said it would be better on the other wall as the box to connect to was there. I didn't have my furniture yet, so I agreed. Well, now I have the furniture and I need it on the wall I

  • Can't partition with disk utility. Options greyed out

    Hi, Bought a used 4 TB Seagate drive, formatted it , checked the speed 150 MB/s read/write and made a partition. Apparently it worked perfect. However after this first partition the drive is behaving erratically. I can not modify partitions anymore n

  • Inserting Payment terms field in ME28 screen

    Dear Friends, Is it possible to insert one column for "payment terms" in ME28 screen. Because purchase approver wants to see the payment terms for particular vendor in the ME28 screen and release. Now he has to go for particular PO to see the Payment

  • Need help using new-webserviceproxy

    I am trying to follow the example in this article, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh849841.aspx Here is what I'm getting, any idea what the issue is? I've tried this from a few different environments with the same results. PS C:\> $zip =

  • Binary XML lightest-weight transform?

    Database 11.2.0.2. I have a set of small XML documents stored in a schema-based binary XML column (pubdate, author, language, title, etc.). I'm using the XML, combined with a bit of longer (blob-based) text to generate a text index using a user_datas