Too many recipients

After initially posting this question in the wrong forum and declaring myself a forum muppet, I have decided to post this question in the correct forum. Here goes. I have up until a week ago been able to send mail to multiple recipients. However, in recent attempts a drop down window appears saying that there are too many recipients. I contact the ISP and they were of no assistance. Has anyone encountered this and manged to solve it?
Thanks
Scott

Kappy wrote:
There is a limit established in Mail as to the maximum number of recipients. I believe the limit is 200, but I'm not positive.
I beg to differ.

Similar Messages

  • Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model

    Hi all ,
    please help me to solve this issue .
    i done with ale settings .
    orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    when i create po it is giving error in output  "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
    how can i rectify this error.
    Thanks

    > orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    do both of them carter diffrent needs or is it the same idoc which is being sent to diffrent systems?
    if yes, then use a single model view with noth receiver systems defined in it.
    if not, i would suggest, copying the standard idoc and create a zidoc and then use different ones for diffrent receivers....
    or u can use diff versions of the orders message type...
    say orders05 for one.... receiver and orders02 for another one....
    hope this helps!!
    Cheers!!
    Sidharth

  • ALE settings error   "Too many recipients found for message type" urgent

    Hi all ,
    please help me to solve this issue !!!!!!!!
    i done with ale settings .
    in the bd64 , orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    when i create po it is giving error in output "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
    how can i rectify this error.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Try to redefine your distribution model to have both receivers of your message type ORDERS in one "model view".
    Regards,
    Jakub

  • Too many recipients found for message type (Distribution model)

    Hi,
    I wanna send Dilvery note using message type DESADV from a SAP system to another non-SAP System.
    I have Created port partner profile and distribution model.
    But the Problem is the same message type DESADV is used to send Dilvery from SAP System to another SAP Client.
    Idoc getting failed and throwing error stating ‘Too many recipients found for message type DESADV in the ALE model ‘.
    I am sure we can create the more than one recipients for same message types. I have done it some time back. Any help highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Raj

    This message pops up when SAP can't identify how to distribute the IDoc based on the settings in BD64. Take a look at the settings there, most likely you'll need to add a filter.
    The big ALE/EDI/IDoc book suggests that the same IDoc may be distributed to 2 different systems but specific details are not clear. It seems that one system should be configured first (it does mention a need to use a filter) and then somehow menu Edit -> Model View -> Distribute should be used.
    I've never done it myself though and have only run into that error when I missed some filter settings in BD64. Hope this helps.

  • Too many recipients found for message type in the ALE model

    Hello Friends,
                            Please help me in solving this error. I have a Outbound sales order confirmation ORDRSP  .
    In the distribution model i have defined the sender receiver and message type clearly...
    But  in va01  after creating sales order  extras ->Output->Hearder --->Edit
    Output type-- BA00
    medium --ALE
    Dispatch time : Send Immediately
    I am getting a error -
    Too many recipients found for message type ORDRSP in the ALE model
    Message no. B1130
    Diagnosis
    In the ALE distribution customer model several recipient systems for IDOCs with message type ORDRSP and filter object type 'KUNNR' with value '100' have been modeled from this system, but only one recipient system is allowed.
    Procedure
    Please change the ALE distribution customer model so that it allows only one recipient system for the message from this system.
    Please help me in solving this error.
    Regards,
    jeevan

    Hi Jeevan,
    In BD64, the said problem occurs, since the message type ORDRSP will be configured to different Logical System.
    Since you are creating sales orders & Output type, system doesnt knows, to which Logical system, it has to be sent since the Message type exists more than once.
    select Your respective Logical System where the Outbound Sales Order Confirmation ORDRSP has been created.
    Under the node ORDRSP, add the filter group for Customer.
    Double click the Filter group and add the respective Customer No.s to whom the Order confirmation needs to be sent.
    Then create Sales Order Confirmation & Output type. Data will be passed(IDoc) to the respective Customer(where the customer no.) exist in the filter.
    Hope it solves your Issues.
    Regards,
    Anbalagan.

  • ALE error  "Too many recipients "

    Hi all ,
    please help me to solve this issue !!!!!!!!
    i done with ale settings .
    in the bd64 , orders message type is used in 2 different model view for 2 different systems
    when i create po it is giving error in output "Too many recipients found for message type ORDERS in the ALE model"
    how can i rectify this error.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please refer the link below:
    http://www.jt77.com/CRM/related-discussion-6255.html
    Thanks,
    Sriram Ponna.

  • Email - too many recipients

    Each month I email out our Parish Newsletter to about 120 addressees.  This month, for the first time, it failed to deliver, returning an error message saying that I am exceeding the temporary limit of the server and that I have too many recipients.  I tried to resolve by splitting into 2 mails of 60 addressees but got same error message
    I can understand the need for anti-spamming techniques, but
    1.  What has changed since last month?
    2.  How temporary is "temporary" ie when will things normailise?
    3.  What is maximum number of recipients I can use during this temporary measure?
    tks
    SD

    I have several groups set up in WLM (I use Windows 7). The sizes range from 6 to over 70. Until very recently I have had no problems sending emails to these groups. However, I have been away for a couple of weeks and since returning have been unable to send to the groups with 70 members. I get  an error message relating to the server of a particular recipient, quoting error message 452.
    On researching this it would appear that the recipient whose address in each case is blocking the sending, is number 50 on the list; implying that WLM has put a restriction on the maximum number I can have in a group. I contacted BT yesterday who said they had made no changes to their operation, and, anyway, they could only speak about using the web based BT Yahoo.
    I received a message  today from BT saying that the problem was "solved". I spoke with them since I tried a test message to one of my groups with 50 recipients - which failed, but when I deleted one person the test message went through.
    A different BT customer service person explained that because of the amount of spam being generated these days, a limit was being put on the number of recipients that could be in a group sent via BT. Their suggestion was that I split my larger groups down to less than 50, but also don't send out emails to two smaller groups within a small space of time. They said that they were "monitoring" the situation but did not commit themselves as to what will happen in the future.
    I am clearly unhappy with this situation and will be contacting BT more formally about it. At least it explains why my (larger) group emails are being rejected. 
    Do BT view these forums?

  • Is it posible to customize the"RESOLVER.ADR.RecipLimit; too many recipients " NDR in Exchange Server 2010?

    if using recipient limits, is it possible to customize or at least reduce the following NDR. If we have the limit set to say50 and someone tries to send to 100, each individual address will be listed, i.e.:
    [email protected]
    #550 5.5.3 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipLimit; too many recipients ##
    user2#domain.com
    #550 5.5.3 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipLimit; too many recipients ##
    [email protected]
    #550 5.5.3 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipLimit; too many recipients ##
    Can this be suppressed or reduced to only say This message wasn't delivered to anyone because there are too many recipients. The limit is 50. This message has 100 recipients.

    Hi,
    I have a test in my environment using Exchange 2010. You can use the following cmdlet to change the text to "This message wasn't delivered to anyone because there are too many recipients. The limit is 50. This message has 100 recipients."
    New-SystemMessage -DsnCode 5.5.3 -Language en -Internal $true -Text "This message wasn't delivered to anyone because there are too many recipients. The limit is 50. This message has 100 recipients."
    Here is the result for your reference.
    Based on my knowledge, I'm afraid that the following information can't be changed.
    Hope it helps.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Too many recipients in email

    I get fax from Myfax via email, so I added my eprint email address to the list of emails on Myfax receive preferences. I get the fax to the yahoo email but not to my eprint email. When I check on ePrint Center it says 
    "Too many recipients in email" any idea how to solve this issue.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Auto forwarding of emails to ePrint server will not work.  If you are using this Auto Forwarding feature provided by yahoo. you need to manually forward the email to ePrint. Make sure that there are no extra email ID's in TO, CC or BCc
    Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
    Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

  • Is anyone else getting a "554 too many recipients" when sending to groups?

    I am trying to work from home, and a current project has a large number of people that need to stay informed.  When I try to do a "reply all" to the group I get a "554 Too many recipients" error message back really quickly.  Seems I can only send to 49 people at once...needless to say this casues problems as the group (so far) is 74 people...
    Anyone got a work arround other that splitting up the group into two messages (what a pain)
    Supposedly the WebMail interface will let me send to 100 at once, but I can't cut-n-paste the addresses from Outlook to Webmail without some MAJOR editing.
    Suggestions PLEASE

    Hey Bob -- You are correct that there is a limit to how many outgoing recipients an email can be sent to, but it is 100 unique addresses.  It sounds like you may be having an issue with your Outlook program; possibly the way your address book is configured if you have more than one address saved for each person you're trying to send the message to.  The address book would be a good place to check first and then looking into troubleshooting the Outlook program would be your next step.  Thanks!
    Karl
    Verizon Support
    Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or Plan.

  • I get a "Too many recipients" Thunderbird error msg when trying to send a group email -- how many is too many ? does Thunderbird have a limit?

    My ISP says it doesn't impose a limit on the number of recipients in a group email, BUT still I get a Thunderbird error msg. Why?

    Well, no, because 4 or 5 times a year, someone writes in with pretty much exactly your question because they too have had a message refused with the "too many recipients" warning. We suggest they use a Mailing List and all is well.

  • Too many recipients, what should I do?

    Hello, I'm trying to send emails to 500 people it doesn't work. I get a message that says I have too many recipients. What should I do? I was wondering if there was a way to do this without splitting the list..
    Many thanks!
    Chester

    I found this, so I guess there is no other way than splitting the mailing list..
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=300575
    MacBook, Powerbook 17", iPod 4G, LaCie HD   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

  • Too many recipients at this hour

    Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: New SMTP DCID 2880414 interface 10.1.1.6 address 202.144.198.251 port 25
    Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: Delivery start DCID 2880414 MID 5800177 to RID [0]
    Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: Delayed: DCID 2880414 MID 5800177 to RID 0 - 4.1.0 - Unknown address error ('452', ['Too many recipients received this hour']) []
    Thu Jan 3 15:47:04 2008 Info: MID 5800177 to RID [0] pending till Thu Jan 3 15:49:08 2008 [Default]
    Thu Jan 3 15:47:11 2008 Info: DCID 2880414 close
    anyone know what this is? too many recipients this hour?

    To follow up on Poesjkin's message, that error text is exactly what an IronPort ESA will give when it applies rate limiting. If the receiving MTA is indeed an IronPort ESA, then that drastically narrows the likely reasons for the rate limiting. The most likely reason is that your sending ESA has an IP address with a poor SenderBase reputation, or has no reputation at all. Another good possibility is that that IP address fails the address->name->address double-lookup DNS verification. Try investigating those and see what you come up with.

  • SMTP Error 452 Too many recipients

    We are using Exchange 2007 at a school to send email to parents.  When we send out email to all parents we get an error back from yahoo:  452 Too many recipients.
    We have 34 recipients on the list.
    Is there a way to configure Exchange SMTP outbound to break this up so it only sends to say 10 at a time?
    Thanks,
    Glenn

    Here's more info on the problem after looking at the logs a bit more.
    When we send to yahoo with 34 recipients, the first recipient is accepted and all the rest are rejected as 'too many recipients'.  Exchange then tries again with the remaining users and one more email is accepted.  In our case it does this three times and then hits a case where the first
    yahoo email address is a bad address.  Yahoo comes back with an error for this address and 'too many recipients' for all the others.  It then gives up and does not try to send the remaining addresses.
    Being able to control the max number of recipients per smtp session would be one fix to this problem as I could set it to something like 10 so that even if one recipient is rejected, the others would not also get rejected as having 'too many recipients'.

  • Too many recipients specified

    Hi ALL.
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)
    libimta.so 6.2-3.04 (built 01:43:03, Jul 15 2005)
    SunOS correo 5.9 Generic_117171-17 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
    Im having an error when one of my users try to send an email to more than 500 local mailboxes, the mail.log_current log shows the next error:
    09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
    09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
    09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified.
    09-Dec-2006 00:12:12.34 tcp_intranet J 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified. (limit reached; last J record for this session)
    I edit the options.dat file this is a copy of this file:
    ! MTA configuration options
    ! This sets the alias resolution order
    ! 8 = Use ALIAS_URL0
    ! 7 = Use ALIAS_URL1
    ! 6 = Use ALIAS_URL2
    ! 4 = Use the alias file
    DOMAIN_UPLEVEL=3
    ALIAS_MAGIC=8764
    ALIAS_URL0=ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R
    USE_REVERSE_DATABASE=4
    REVERSE_URL=ldap:///$V?$N?sub?$R
    USE_DOMAIN_DATABASE=0
    ALLOW_RECIPIENTS_PER_TRANSACTION=1500
    ALLOW_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SESSION=1500
    REJECT_RECIPIENTS_PER_TRANSACTION=2500
    ! MISSING_RECIPIENT_POLICY controls how illegal headers that don't
    ! contain any To:, Cc:, or Bcc: fields are handled for channels that
    ! do not have their own explicit missingrecipientpolicy keyword set.
    ! The default of 0 means that the envelope addresses are used to
    ! construct a valid To: header field. This default behavior tends
    ! to be especially appropriate for the tcp_local channel.
    MISSING_RECIPIENT_POLICY=0
    MISSING_RECIPIENT_GROUP_TEXT=Undisclosed recipients
    ALIAS_DOMAINS=6
    LOG_HEADER=1
    LDAP_SCHEMALEVEL=1
    VACATION_TEMPLATE=file:///opt/SUNWmsgsr/data/vacation/$3I/$1U/$2U/$U.vac
    Do somebody known how to fix this issue???
    Tanks Ram

    Shane,
    Thank you for the message. I think the real solution was putting the lines in the "tcp_local_option" file vs the "tcp_local.opt" file name. I'm not up on how things vary from version to version -- the original poster was using 6.2 and I'm on 6.3. I figured file names wouldn't change across minor versions. I guess I shouldn't make those type of assumptions. The user just tried sending again with their Thunderbird client, and was able to send to the group of user names being used.... i.e. it worked.
    For completeness, two points.
    1) here is a tweaked entry for the error in the mail log:
    20-Jul-2007 11:46:49.84 tcp_intranet JE 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 452 4.5.3 Too many recipients specified. 2
    The error message that came back to the user also said "too many recipients".
    2) On page 404 of the "Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.3 Administration Guide", it says under section 12.9.7 "Limiting Message Recipients" regarding recipientlimit and recipientcutoff:
    recipientlimit specifies the total number of recipient addresses that will be accepted for the message.... No message will be accepted for delivery if the limit if the value is exceeded.... The default for both infinite unless the corresponding channel keyword is specified.
    I interpreted that paragraph to mean that it was a maximum number of users allowed to be sent to in a message, not a minimum (lower-limit); meaning that if no value was given in some file, then one could send a message to any number of users. In no way did I conclude your idea of : "So by being 'unlimited' this just means that the smallest applicable limit applies ". I'll have to work on the concept some more.
    Hal

Maybe you are looking for