Too many remotes

Hi Folks,
I have just set up my new Apple TV and this works well... BUT, the new ATV remote also works the iMac at the same time, sending the iMac into a frenzy of volume changes, suddenly launching iTunes and Front Row etc, everytime I point the remote at the Apple TV.
Now, I see that I can pair the ATV to only accept input from the new remote, but is there also a way to pair the iMac with it's own (old white) remote, so that it will only accept input from that one, and not the new ATV remote anymore ?
Cheers,
David.

go to security & privacy in settings and pair the remote you want to use with the imac
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1619
you can do the same thing on your appletv if you want it only to respond to 1 remote

Similar Messages

  • After Loading Lion I now get 5 windows w/ a graphic of a Red Stop sign with an ! mark and the following text message: "DAVE Networking  Dave kernel extensions could not be loaded! Error 71 - Too many levels of remote in path."

    After Loading Lion I now get 5 windows w/ a graphic of a Red Stop sign with an ! mark and the following text message:
    "DAVE Networking 
    Dave kernel extensions could not be loaded! Error
    71 - Too many levels of remote in path."
    I have uninstalled DAVE and used Clean App to remove trace elements of program, however I still get the message and am unable to eliminate the error messages.  When I click OK the message goes away briefly and then comes back up.
    Any solutions would be great.

    Dave,
    Thanks....What I did was load the free eval version of Dave 9.0 and then used the uninstaller which must have deleted the kernel giving me the problem. 
    Thanks for the response.
    Razor

  • Provider hosted app error message: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.

    Hi,
    I have a customer running a provider hosted app and in Sharepoint 2013. Things have been working fine but recently they keep experiencing an issue where the all the app parts on the page show the following error message. Does anyone have an idea what
    could be causing this problem and how I can fix it? The Sharepoint site and provider hosted app site are running on a Server 2008 R2 box with IIS 7.5.
    Server Error in '/Test.Sharepoint.App' Application.
    The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.
    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.           
    Exception Details: System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.
    Source Error:
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
    Stack Trace:
    [WebException: The remote server returned an error: (429) Too Many Requests.]
    System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse() +8527180
    Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.SPWebRequestExecutor.Execute() +58
    Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.ClientRequest.ExecuteQueryToServer(ChunkStringBuilder sb) +975
    Test.Sharepoint.AppWeb.Pages.LatestAnnouncement.GetLatestAnnouncement(Boolean showFullText) +610
    Test.Sharepoint.AppWeb.Pages.LatestAnnouncement.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +764
    System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +71
    System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3178
    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.18034
    Impreza Software Development

    Hi GuYumming,
    I have checked the Sharepoint site using Fiddler and my X-SharePointHealthScore stays consistently on 1, I have even refreshed the site and had the "(429) Too Many Requests" error happen right in front of me whilst Fiddler is running and when I look at the
    200 response for the Sharepoint site it is still showing "X-SharePointHealthScore: 1".
    I assume because of this I do not need to make any of the changes suggested in your article above?
    I have also been through the ULS logs and found the following 3 log entries that appear to relate to the issue but they do not really mean much to me so I am hoping that you can help:
    Begin CSOM Request ManagedThreadId=59, NativeThreadId=12476
    SPResourceTally(ClientServiceRequestDuration) value 1 + 150425 > 150000
    ResourceBudgetExceeded, sending throttled status code. Exception=Microsoft.SharePoint.SPResourceBudgetExceededException: ResourceBudgetExceeded     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPResourceTally.Check(Int32 value)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAggregateResourceTally.Check(SPResourceKind kind, Int32 value)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.SPClientServiceHost.OnBeginRequest()
    Impreza Software Development

  • The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC) protocol stream is incorrect. Too many parameters were provided in this RPC request. The maximum is 2100

    Hello,
    I am getting a new message this morning creating a view:
    The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC) protocol stream is incorrect. Too many parameters were provided in this RPC request. The maximum is 2100
    Any ideas on this?
    Thanks,
    DOm
    System Center Operations Manager 2007 / System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R2 / Forefront Client Security / Forefront Identity Manager

    Hi,
    Based on my research, this is a limitation of sql server.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx
    And please refer to the below article to find a fix for this issue:
    How to fix SQL error: "Too many parameters were provided in this RPC request"
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/emeadaxsupport/archive/2009/09/01/how-to-fix-sql-error-too-many-parameters-were-provided-in-this-rpc-request.aspx
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Regards, Yan Li

  • HT1212 My iPad is disabled because of too many password incorrect answers. I tryed connecting to iTunes but it still said Enter Password On iPad, and it said only Try Again, Cancel and Find an answer to this problem, or something simular to that. What do

    My ipad is disabled because of too many itemps and I tryed connecting to iTunes but it said nothing on the Apple Support page said it would. What do I do???

    The answer is in the article. Finish reading the second part:
    If you see one of following alerts, you need to erase the device:
    "iTunes could not connect to the [device] because it is locked with a passcode. You must enter your passcode on the [device] before it can be used with iTunes."
    "You haven't chosen to have [device] trust this computer"
    If you have Find My iPhone enabled, you can use Remote Wipe to erase the contents of your device. If you have been using iCloud to back up, you may be able to restore the most recent backup to reset the passcode after the device has been erased.
    Alternatively, place the device in recovery mode and restore it to erase the device:
    Disconnect the USB cable from the device, but leave the other end of the cable connected to your computer's USB port.
    Turn off the device: Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button for a few seconds until the red slider appears, then slide the slider. Wait for the device to shut down.
    While pressing and holding the Home button, reconnect the USB cable to the device. The device should turn on.
    Continue holding the Home button until you see the Connect to iTunes screen.
    iTunes will alert you that it has detected a device in recovery mode. Click OK, and then restore the device.

  • Too many distributed transactions

    I am programming an application with JDeveloper 10g and ADF Framework. It is a application that only queries data (no modifications). I created ViewObjects based on sql queries and an application module.
    The problem is that is I execute that application for some time, I get the following error:
    java.sql.SQLException: ORA-02042: too many distributed transactions
         at oracle.jdbc.dbaccess.DBError.throwSqlException(DBError.java:189)
         at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTIoer.processError(TTIoer.java:242)
         at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.Oall7.receive(Oall7.java:554)
         at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.doOall7(TTC7Protocol.java)
         at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.parseExecuteFetch(TTC7Protocol.java:888)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteQuery(OracleStatement.java:2346)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:2660)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:457)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeQuery(OraclePreparedStatement.java:387)
         at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.buildResultSet(QueryCollection.java:665)
    As it is a query only program, i do not need transactions. How can fix this?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    this is information from metalink:
    The ORA-2042 indicates that you should increase the parameter
    distributed_transactions.
    The ORA-2063 indicates that this must be done at the remote
    database.
    Explanation
    If the distributed transaction table is full on either side of
    the database link you get the error ORA-2042:
    ORA-02042: "too many distributed transactions"
    Cause: the distributed transaction table is full,
    because too many distributed transactions are active.
    Action: increase the INIT.ORA "distributed_transactions" or
    run fewer transactions.
    If you are sure you don't have too many concurrent
    distributed transactions, this indicates an internal
    error and support should be notified.
    Instance shutdown/restart would be a workaround.
    When the error is generated at the remote database it is
    accompanied with an ORA-2063. In this case the parameter
    distributed_transactions must be increased at the remote
    database.
    If there is no ORA-2063 the parameter distributed_transactions
    must be increased at the local database.

  • ORA-02042: too many distributed transactions

    1. I have been working on a portal application for several weeks.
    2. Portal is installed in 1 instance and my data is in another instance.
    3. I've had no ora-02042 problems in the devt environment set up that way.
    4. I've recently migrated the application/pages to a test environment set up that way.
    5. I've been working in the test environment for several days with no problems.
    6. For some portlets on some pages I'm now getting:
    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
    Failed to parse query
    Error:ORA-02042: too many distributed transactions
    Error:ORA-02042: too many distributed transactions
    ORA-02063: preceding line from
    LINK_TO_TEST (WWV-11230) Failed to parse as PACID_SCHEMA -
    select user_action.userid, action.name,
    user_action.created_date,
    user_action.created_by, action.action_id,
    'del' del_link from user_action , action
    where user_action.action_id =
    action.action_id and user_action.userid
    LIKE UPPER(:userid) order by USERID
    ASC, NAME ASC, CREATED_DATE
    ASC (WWV-08300)
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    7. I cannot find anything about this error in the db log files for either instance.
    8. I've increased distributed transactions to 200 in the portal db and bounced
    it. Still get the error.
    9. No records in dba_2pc_pending or dba_2pc_neighbors in the portal instance.
    10. I get the error in various reports and form LOVs at different times. Pages with a lot of portlets seem to be more prone to the error.
    Here is a typical LOV error:
    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
    COMBOBOX LOV ERROR:
    LOV: "ASIMM_1022.TITLE_LOV"
    Parse Message: Parse as pre-set global: "PACID_SCHEMA".
    Find Message: LOV is of type DYNAMIC (LOV based on SQL query).
    Query: "select code display_column, code return_column from codes where table_id = 'OFFICER_TITLE' order by code"
    wwv_parse.parse_as_user: ORA-02042: too many distributed transactions ORA-02063: preceding line from LINK_TO_TEST wwv_parse.parse_as_user: Failed to parse as PACID_SCHEMA - select code display_column, code return_column from codes where table_id = 'OFFICER_TITLE' order by code wwv_security.check_comp_privilege: Insufficient privileges. wwpre_utl.get_path_id: The preference path does not exist: ORACLE.WEBVIEW.PARAMETERS.217_USER_INPUT_ASIMM_5423428
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Why are these select statements being interpreted as distributed transactions? Note:1032658.6 suggests I "USE SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY". Is this necessary? If so how?
    What puzzles me is that this set up has been working fine for several days. I don't know of any changes to my environment apart from me increasing distributed transactions.
    null

    Hi,
    this is information from metalink:
    The ORA-2042 indicates that you should increase the parameter
    distributed_transactions.
    The ORA-2063 indicates that this must be done at the remote
    database.
    Explanation
    If the distributed transaction table is full on either side of
    the database link you get the error ORA-2042:
    ORA-02042: "too many distributed transactions"
    Cause: the distributed transaction table is full,
    because too many distributed transactions are active.
    Action: increase the INIT.ORA "distributed_transactions" or
    run fewer transactions.
    If you are sure you don't have too many concurrent
    distributed transactions, this indicates an internal
    error and support should be notified.
    Instance shutdown/restart would be a workaround.
    When the error is generated at the remote database it is
    accompanied with an ORA-2063. In this case the parameter
    distributed_transactions must be increased at the remote
    database.
    If there is no ORA-2063 the parameter distributed_transactions
    must be increased at the local database.

  • ORA-02020: too many database links in use ; but OK with where clause...

    Hello all,
    I have a view called V_MEDGEN_LISTRADIO but I can't run
    SELECT * FROM V_MEDGEN_LISTRADIO
    ORA-02020: too many database links in useThe cause is that we call in the view 5 tables over dblink and the open_links parameter is set to 4.
    What is strange is that when I run this select by adding a where clause then it works!
    SELECT * FROM V_MEDGEN_LISTRADIO WHERE SPRR = 3645;Can someone explain me ? (use of index so all tables are not called ???)
    Thanks

    Explain plan for SELECT * FROM V_MEDGEN_LISTRADIO WHERE SPRR = 3645;
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name            | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop | Inst   |IN-OUT|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                 |     1 |   244 |    19   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |                 |     1 |   244 |    19   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                         |                 |     1 |   244 |    18   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                        |                 |     1 |   218 |    17   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                 |     1 |   188 |    15   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                      |                 |     3 |   384 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                     |                 |     3 |   186 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   7 |        REMOTE                          | SPRR            |     1 |    20 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | DEV10~ | R->S |
    |   8 |        REMOTE                          | MPAT_MF         |     3 |   126 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | DEV10~ | R->S |
    |   9 |       REMOTE                           | SPER_P          |     1 |    66 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    |* 10 |      TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| DOSSIER_MEDICAL |     1 |    60 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |
    |* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | DOSMED_MPR_IDX2 |     2 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |  12 |     REMOTE                             | MEP             |     1 |    30 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    |  13 |    REMOTE                              | SSV             |     1 |    26 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      10 - filter("DM"."EXAM_TYPE"='TELEM')
      11 - access("DM"."MPR"="P"."SPER")
    Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
       7 - SELECT "SPRR","MNEMO" FROM "SPRR" "MP" WHERE "SPRR"=3645 (accessing 'DEV10_DBLK' )
       8 - SELECT "SPAT","DU","RMPB","SPRR_MF","AU" FROM "MPAT_MF" "MF" WHERE "SPRR_MF"=3645 AND NVL("AU",:1+1)>=:2 AND
           "RMPB"='PRINC' AND "DU"<=:3 (accessing 'DEV10_DBLK' )
       9 - SELECT "SPER","NOM","PRENOM","DTE_NAI" FROM "SPER_P" "P" WHERE "SPER"=:1 (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )
      12 - SELECT "MSJ","MEPNO_SEQ","SSV_OU_PAT_SEJOURNE" FROM "MEP" "MEP" WHERE :1="MSJ" AND :2="MEPNO_SEQ" (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )
      13 - SELECT "SSV","LIB_1" FROM "SSV" "SSV" WHERE :1="SSV" (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )Explain plan for SELECT * FROM V_MEDGEN_LISTRADIO
    Plan hash value: 3820716840
    | Id  | Operation                                | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop | Inst   |IN-OUT|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |                       |     7 |  1708 |   771   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                           |                       |     7 |  1708 |   771   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                           |                       |     7 |  1708 |   770   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                          |                       |     7 |  1568 |   763   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                         |                       |     7 |  1386 |   756   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                       |     7 |  1176 |   742   (1)| 00:00:09 |       |       |        |      |
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                       |   194 | 24444 |   414   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |
    |   7 |        TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| DOSSIER_MEDICAL       |   194 | 11640 |    23   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |
    |*  8 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | DOSMED_EXAM_TYPE_IDX2 |   194 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |
    |   9 |        REMOTE                            | SPER_P                |     1 |    66 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    |  10 |       REMOTE                             | MPAT_MF               |     1 |    42 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | DEV10~ | R->S |
    |  11 |      REMOTE                              | MEP                   |     1 |    30 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    |  12 |     REMOTE                               | SSV                   |     1 |    26 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | ORAP_~ | R->S |
    |  13 |    REMOTE                                | SPRR                  |     1 |    20 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | DEV10~ | R->S |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       8 - access("DM"."EXAM_TYPE"='TELEM')
    Remote SQL Information (identified by operation id):
       9 - SELECT "SPER","NOM","PRENOM","DTE_NAI" FROM "SPER_P" "P" WHERE :1="SPER" (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )
      10 - SELECT "SPAT","DU","RMPB","SPRR_MF","AU" FROM "MPAT_MF" "MF" WHERE NVL("AU",:1+1)>=:2 AND "RMPB"='PRINC' AND "DU"<=:3 AND
            :4="SPAT" (accessing 'DEV10_DBLK' )
      11 - SELECT "MSJ","MEPNO_SEQ","SSV_OU_PAT_SEJOURNE" FROM "MEP" "MEP" WHERE :1="MSJ" AND :2="MEPNO_SEQ" (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )
      12 - SELECT "SSV","LIB_1" FROM "SSV" "SSV" WHERE :1="SSV" (accessing 'ORAP_DBLK' )
      13 - SELECT "SPRR","MNEMO" FROM "SPRR" "MP" WHERE :1="SPRR" (accessing 'DEV10_DBLK' )

  • ORA-02020 too many database links

    Hello,
    I'm getting the ORA-02020 too many database links error in my Apex application. This error occurs when I run an interactive report in a page. There are 21 pages and 7 database links in the application. Each page has one interactive report that references one database link in the region source.
    The database links are referenced in each page as follows: database link1 (page 1); database link2 (pages 2 and 3); database link3 (pages 4-7), database link4 (pages 8-15); database link5 (pages 16-18); database link6 (pages 19); and database link7 (pages 20-21). Each database link is referenced to separate schemas in one remote Oracle database.
    I tried to eliminate the error by setting the open_links and open_links_per_instance parameters in the init.ora file of the remote and XE databases to 100 then restarted the both databases. This solution did not work. I created separate Application Processes from the Shared Components to close each database link by implementing the following:
    Click on Shared Components&gt; Logic &gt; Application Processes &gt; Create &gt;
    Name: CLOSE_LINK1
    Sequence: 1
    Point: On Load: Before Header (page template header)
    Type: PL/SQL Anonymous Block
    Process Text: execute immediate 'ALTER SESSION CLOSE DATABASE LINK LINK1';
    Error Message: Database Link Error
    When I run the application now, the ORA-02081: database link is not open error appears.
    Please help anyone! I know someone has experienced these same errors.
    Thanks,
    Ms. H

    Joel,
    Thank you for your quick response. For clarification purposes, could you provide samples for 1) issuing the CLOSE DATABASE LINK and catching the exception; and 2) querying from V$DBLINK prior to issuing the CLOSE DATABASE LINK from the Shared Components &gt; Logic &gt; Application Processes?
    Lets assume the following query with a database link in the region source is referenced for Page 1.
    Page 1 - Employee Listing
    Region Source:
    select ename, job, hiredate
    from scott.emp@link1
    Lets assume the following Application Processes from the Shared Components is referenced to close the database link:
    Click on Shared Components&gt; Logic &gt; Application Processes &gt; Create &gt;
    Name: CLOSE_LINK1
    Sequence: 1
    Point: On Load: Before Header (page template header)
    Type: PL/SQL Anonymous Block
    Process Text: execute immediate 'ALTER SESSION CLOSE DATABASE LINK LINK1';
    Error Message: Database Link Error
    My thoughts are to do the following:
    1. Log in SQL*Plus as SYS
    SQL&gt; grant select to v_$dblink to scott;
    2. In Apex, goto Shared Components&gt; Logic &gt; Application Processes and add the following queries in the Process Text:
    Name: CLOSE_LINK1
    Sequence: 1
    Process Text:
    select db_link from v$dblink;
    execute immediate 'ALTER SESSION CLOSE DATABASE LINK LINK1';
    3. Catch the exception???
    Your assistance is greatly appreciated. :8}
    Ms. H

  • Sending to local user gives too many hops

    I have set up Mavericks server for mail. Works perfectly for incoming and outgoing mail to other domains but fails when trying to send mail to a local user. Here are my settings:
    example.com is my primary domain, it provides DNS and Mail service
    there are other domains being hosted (web) with example.com providing mail service for them.
    Mail Server setting under "Provide Mails for...": Domain Name is example.com, Virtual domains: myotherdomain.com, example.com (included in list, is this correct?), and some more
    DNS settings: each domain has a machine record for the domain name (e.g. example.com has an A record, myotherdomain.com has its own A record), each domain has an MX pointing to example.com. Domain example.com has an alias (CNAME) record mail.example.com pointing to example.com. This is the only place where the name mail.example.com appears in the whole server.
    Last night I tried to reply to a mail I received from a user on myotherdomain.com. My receiving account is also on myotherdomain.com (myotherdomain.com is one of my domains with MX pointing to example.com). When I simply hit reply the mail server eventually reported back that the mail was not delivered due to too many hops.
    Here are the headers from the mail I received. I simply hit reply and got the too many hops. WHY?
    Return-Path: <[email protected]>
    Delivered-To: [email protected]
    Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
              by miniserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE9C4DA4D7
              for <[email protected]>; Wed,  5 Mar 2014 17:09:10 +0100 (CET)
    X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
    Received: from miniserver.example.com ([127.0.0.1])
              by localhost (miniserver.example.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
              with ESMTP id 3oDO8uq8aS6W for <[email protected]>;
              Wed,  5 Mar 2014 17:09:10 +0100 (CET)
    Received: from miniserver.example.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
              by miniserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 628CD4DA4BE
              for <[email protected]>; Wed,  5 Mar 2014 17:09:10 +0100 (CET)
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="=_50c5075d15c85c7a43995d47cd97c851"
    Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:09:10 +0100
    From: anita <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Hello
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    X-Sender: [email protected]
    User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION
    Here is what the mail server reported back after trying to reply:
    This is the mail system at host miniserver.example.com.
    I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
    be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
    For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
    If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
    delete your own text from the attached returned message.
                      The mail system
    <[email protected]>: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 554 5.4.0 id=78365-11
       - Rejected by next-hop MTA on relaying, from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025):
       554 5.4.0 Error: too many hops (in reply to end of DATA command)
    Reporting-MTA: dns; miniserver.example.com
    X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 98CF04DB967
    X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
    Arrival-Date: Wed,  5 Mar 2014 18:52:58 +0100 (CET)
    Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
    Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
    Action: failed
    Status: 5.4.0
    Remote-MTA: dns; 127.0.0.1
    Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.4.0 id=78365-11 - Rejected by next-hop MTA on
       relaying, from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 554 5.4.0 Error: too many hops
    Thanks for your help

    Invoke the following diagnostic by launching Terminal.app from Applications > Utilities and see if there are any network or DNS issues reported:
    sudo changeip -checkhostname
    Also post the internal and external DNS translations of the following:
    dig +short miniserver.example.com
    dig +short mail.example.com
    dig +short MX myotherdomain.com
    dig +short MX example.com
    dig +short @8.8.8.8 miniserver.example.com
    dig +short @8.8.8.8 mail.example.com
    dig +short MX @8.8.8.8 myotherdomain.com
    dig +short MX @8.8.8.8 example.com
    I'd look for a bogus or missing MX record for myotherdomain.com, to start with.
    FWIW, myotherdomain.com is a real and registered domain.    Probably not yours, I'm guessing.  The example.net and example.org domains are also available for obfuscation, in addition to the example.com domain.

  • Too many database connections and configurator logins ?

    Hi,
    We're having some performance and/or stability problem with Oracle Waveset 8.1.1. patch 2.
    I'm not sure what the problems is yet, but two facts got my attention:
    I noticed for too many database connections waiting to be closed on the OS, varying between 600 and 1200 :
    TCP: IPv4
    Local Address Remote Address Swind Send-Q Rwind Recv-Q State
    doesburg.ic.uva.nl.33555 hopewell.ic.uva.nl.1539 49640 0 49640 0 TIME_WAIT
    doesburg.ic.uva.nl.33556 hopewell.ic.uva.nl.1539 49640 0 49640 0 TIME_WAIT
    doesburg.ic.uva.nl.33557 hopewell.ic.uva.nl.1539 49640 0 49640 0 TIME_WAIT
    doesburg.ic.uva.nl.33558 hopewell.ic.uva.nl.1539 49640 0 49640 0 TIME_WAIT
    etc.
    (doesburg is our Solaris 10 server where the tomcat application server is installed, hopewell is our Oracle 10g database server )
    I also noticed numerous Configurator logins in the audit log, about 10 per second:
    Audit Event Details
    Timestamp 03/15/2011 04:37:05 PM MET
    Subject CONFIGURATOR
    Action Login
    Result Success
    Identity System Type User
    Object Name CONFIGURATOR
    Server DOESBURG.IC.UVA.NL
    Sequence Number No Value
    Interface BPE
    Resource No Value
    AccountId No Value
    Message No Value
    Changes No Value
    Organization Membership Top
    Event Parameters
    Session ID #SESS#15E4CCFDD2645B36:10C191A6:12EB99FCC85:-5A50
    Configurator logins on the BPE interface which we don't use?
    Has anyone seen something like this before? What could cause it?
    Greetings,
    Marijke

    I'm still struggling with this problem. Our database administrator did add some tracing, and we see these type of queries:
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT task.id, task.type, name, :"SYS_B_0", :"SYS_B_1", summary, :"SYS_B_2", :"SYS_B_3", xmlSize, :"SYS_B_4"
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT object.id, object.type, name FROM object WHERE object.type=:"SYS_B_0"
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM orgchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM rolechange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    SELECT tstamp, id, version, changeType FROM objchange WHERE tstamp > :1 AND type=:2 ORDER BY tstamp
    541 seperate logon sessions by waveset in about 2 minutes.
    Has anyone seen this? What could cause it?
    Greetings,
    Marijke

  • ICloud mail "Too many connections" error

    Anyone ever gotten this error when sending to an @me.com account? This is what it looks like when I send email to myself using it. My gut says it's a Boxcar issue but I haven't used that service in months and I've now disconnected anything from it. This is the error I'm seeing back when sending email to my iCloud account:
    This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
    Message-id: <[email protected]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:29:50 -0500
    From: Brad Franklin <[email protected]>
    To: Brad Franklin <[email protected]>
    Subject: Test
    Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
    Recipient address: [email protected]
    Original address: [email protected]
    Reason: Rejection greeting returned by server.
    Diagnostic code: smtp;554 Transaction failed. Too many connections.
    Remote system: dns;push.boxcar.io (TCP|17.172.204.240|45227|173.192.56.11|25) (Transaction failed. Too many connections.)
    Original-envelope-id: [email protected]
    Reporting-MTA: dns;st11p01mm-asmtp005.mac.com (tcp-daemon)
    Arrival-date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:29:54 +0000 (GMT)
    Original-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
    Final-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
    Action: failed
    Status: 5.0.0 (Rejection greeting returned by server.)
    Remote-MTA: dns;push.boxcar.io (TCP|17.172.204.240|45227|173.192.56.11|25)
    (Transaction failed. Too many connections.)
    Diagnostic-code: smtp;554 Transaction failed. Too many connections.

    I'm also having this issue with two of my accounts (the main ones I use the most!) I get this message:

  • ITunes 9/iPod OS 3.1.1 combo has too many issues/bugs

    After upgrading to iTunes 9 and Touch to 3.1.1 I am having too many issues:
    iPOD TOUCH:
    1. Everytime I launch music, it displays "upgrading library" message and takes eons (5 minutes) to show the library
    2. Playlists don't work: most playlists show tracks in random order not matching iTunes, and also with total number of tracks different from iTunes. This had rendered most playlist as useless. Wondering when Apple will fix it.
    iTUNES:
    1. Much hyped arranging of applications through iTunes doesn't work. I took whole lot of time arranging the applications in iTunes virtual desktop, but after syncing I found entire arrangement lost both in iTunes and in Touch. I did it many times, but with the same unwanted result.
    Any help?

    That's what i used to tell people. but I up(down)graded to version 9 itunes, and version 3.1.1 for the ipod touch and now i can't restore the ipod because itunes can't connect to the software update server. why do i want to restore the ipod touch? mostly because every extra app added refuses to work! nothing launches. even apple's own remote app can't push through this mess the updates have created.
    I'm on a mac. 10.5.8 everything used to work just fine before these updates. What hurts even more is that i actually had to pay for the touch 3.1.1 update as well, and now i've got a non-functioning ipod. cheers apple. How about they release an update to reverse the wonderful job this latest version has performed... Or at least a single company communication as to what is wrong, and how to fix it, rather than a dozen different suggestions in forums and non-existent support documentation!
    rant now over. please just fix it apple.

  • Smq2 - Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attampts

    Experts,
    I was working on a data initial load from ECC to CRM. But the status remains "Running".
    And in smq2 I saw the queue with "SYSFAIL" with info "Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attampts".
    But my user's not locked in either CRM or ECC.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks a lot
    Shane

    Hi Shane,
    Whenever there is data transfer between R/3 and CRM it happens via a DIALOG user.
    Henceforth, We have to maintain the dialog user in both the CRM and the R/3 systems.
    To check whether the user is a dialog user , goto the Tx. SU01 and type in the User maintained in the SM59 Tx for the Data Transfer.
    Check the User Type - It has to be Dialog User, else change the user to Dialog User.
    Secondly, the User sepcified for the Destination in the CRM system has to exist in R/3 system also and vice-versa.
    Henceforth, check the existance of the user in the respective system.
    For Example. In Tx :SM59 ,for the R/3 destination QWC505, If the Dialog user specified was TESTER1. Then login to R/3, goto Tx: su01 and check the user exists in R/3.
    Thirdly, In Tx:SM59, After sepcifying the LOGON details for the respective destination,Check the following :
    1. Click on the REMOTE LOGON Button
    2. click on the CONNECTION Test Button.
    3. Click on the UNICODE Test Button.
    If all the above criteria's are met, Then there should not be any problem WRT to "Password logon no longer possible error in the queues."
    i faced the same problem some time back, I was to able to troubleshoot the problem with the above information. Hope You will also be able to fix the probelm.
    Best Regards,
    Vignesh Ravikumar

  • This program is stopping because too many errors have occurred.

    I'm putting a game through QA and they found that the Director Projector throws the following error in Windows 7 when the user switches their windows user.
    "This program is stopping because too many errors have occurred."
    To test, I created an empty director projector that does nothing but repeat frame 1 and it throws the same error.  Any thoughts on what could be causing this?

    Has anyone figured out how to fix this problem? It is happening to me in a kiosk that runs 24 hours a day. If I use Log Me In to check on the kiosk remotely, it sometimes throws this error. Log Me In automatically switches to a different user account. After I disconnect from Log Me In session, the error occurs, I suppose when it switches back to the original user.
    This is a big problem, any help will be appreciated.

Maybe you are looking for