Too much clips to handle!!!

Hey,
Recently i shot a wedding with 3 camera's. Z1, 2x Panasonic Avchd entry level camcorder, and just finished capturing Z1 3 tapes about 2.5 hr. just 3 files to go,
and when i saw the other folder of AVCHD files they are near about 950 clips... Omg i can't edit that this is not some hollywood project, this is a simple wedding video.
In past i love to edit multicam (3/4) camera's but they are a tapes with single files and now this is mess.....
Mostly i work with 1440x1080 for BD authoring, and that AVCHD clips are 1920x1080...this is not a issue for me here the issue is quantity of clips that i am going handle.....
thats what iam going to do importing all clips of one camera in PR cs6 and exporting in MPEG2-1440x1080 and than edit in Z1's timline. i've done an experiment it looks awesome. and nothing to worry about scrubbing loading clips b'zoz that takes to much time to load 900 clips.
the question is am i going to see quality loss?
PR cs6 updated
i7 860
16 Gb ram
No SSD
1TB HDD 7200 rpmx3
Gtx 580
Project....HDV 1080i

Did you try to convert the AVCHD with it? Their previous product Neo Scene handled both and Cineform Studio Pro handles AVCHD. AVCHD is Mpeg 4 so if they used the same Cineform Player that was in Neo Scene then it should have support for AVCHD.
Eric
ADK

Similar Messages

Will SolidWorks be too much for Parallels to handle?

As per the subject.
Before I try, might as well as a question to save me from headache later on.
Will it be too much?

Sorry, found it.
Search is your friend.
I was being lazy.

Too much Sculpture?

Hi all,
For my course I have to do a piece of work using only Sculpture to create a "real sounding" sound design for a piece of video. In total there are about 40 to 60 different sounds I need to create=lots of Sculptures!
At the minute I'm running about 9 instances of Sculpture and a 24.6mB video clip through Logic. (I also have a fair bit of automation running too)
Problem is it's all getting to be a bit too much for my poor iMac. I know this is all power and RAM hungry stuff, but question is, how many instances of Sculpture can I sensibly expect my computer to be able to handle? Also, what is the best way to get around this? Should I compress the video down,should I start bouncing out some audio into another session, or would freezing the tracks help?
I also need to be able to keep all my instances of Sculpture, and it would be nice if i could keep them all in the same session..is there a way I could keep all the instances of Sculpture in one session!?
Sorry it's so many questions all in one hit! Thanks for any help.
Mike
iMac G5, 2GHz, 1G RAM Mac OS X (10.4.8) Logic Pro 7.1.1, M-Audio Firewire 410

mate you are definitely going about this the wrong way!!
what to do is design each sound carefully - and i would not necessarily use sculpture to achieve this, then export the midi region as an audio file. if you export them as a wav, you can then import them into a different song, hit move audio to original position and all your individually hand crafted sounds will line up in their correct position. you will use wayyy less resources.
sculpture won't necessarily make things more realistic - it is much better for creating otherworldly sounds. you would do far better to do your own foley recording. literally go and record bits of metal clunking together, that sort of thing. and you would be very surprised as to what sounds 'realistic'. sometimes the oddest combinations of things time stretched or tuned down can sound more 'realistic' than the actual sound itself. in the same way they used different shades of pink and purple to give the uniforms the right effect in the black and white classic 'the great dictator'.
that combined with a really terrific space designer IR or several to put the objects into the right space in relation to what you see and you can get a very slick and realistic effect.
you don't need to be running 40-60 tracks of sculpture mate.

Page leads to proxy error sometimes or taking too much time to load

Hi All,
APEX4.0
Web server: Apache 1.3.9 (Oracle 9iAS 10.0.1.2.2)
I am getting the below error at first time when I try to open a page or the page takes 3 to 5 mins to load. From second time on wards, It takes 5 to 8 sec to open as normal. I debugged the page and checked the log. Logs and execution time are looking normal. why the page takes too much time to load at first time or it leads to proxy error?? Is anybody got same experience before??
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET/pls/apex/f.
Reason : Document contains no data
Please guide me to find out and resolve this issue....
Thanks in Advance
Lakshmi

Hi this is what the solution given by your link
A.1.6 Connection Timeouts Through a Stateful Firewall Affect System Performance
Problem
To improve performance the mod_oc4j component in each Oracle HTTP Server process maintains open TCP connections to the AJP port within each OC4J instance it sends requests to.
In situations where a firewall exists between OHS and OC4J, packages sent via AJP are rejected if the connections can be idle for periods in excess of the inactivity timeout of stateful firewalls.
However, the AJP socket is not closed; as long as the socket remains open, the worker thread is tied to it and is never returned to the thread pool. OC4J will continue to create more threads, and will eventually exhaust system resources.
Solution
The OHS TCP connection must be kept "alive" to avoid firewall timeout issues. This can be accomplished using a combination of OC4J configuration parameters and Apache runtime properties.
Set the following parameters in the httpd.conf or mod_oc4j.conf configuration files. Note that the value of Oc4jConnTimeout sets the length of inactivity, in seconds, before the session is considered inactive.
Oc4jUserKeepalive on
Oc4jConnTimeout 12000 (or a similar value)
Also set the following AJP property at OC4J startup to enable OC4J to close AJP sockets in the event that a connection between OHS and OC4J is dropped due to a firewall timeout:
ajp.keepalive=true
For example:
java -Dajp.keepalive=true -jar oc4j.jar
Please tell me where or which file i should put the option
java -Dajp.keepalive=true -jar oc4j.jar ??????/

Too much delay to load new SWF after unloaded the current SWF

Hi,
In our application we are using more than 10 SWFs. While traversing one SWF to other trying to unload currently loaded SWF and loading the new one. We were success to unload the existing SWF but the problem is, taking too much time to load new SWF (more than 5 seconds). Please suggest a useful method to avoid this delay to get better performance.
will get some idea from following code snippet.
Thanks
public function SwitchSWFs():void
               if (null != SystemAgent.getInstance().currentSWFLoader)
                                SystemAgent.getInstance().currentSWFLoader.unload();
                                SystemAgent.getInstance().currentSWFLoader = null;
                                trace("HomeUI : Previous swf unloaded!!!");
                else
                addChild(SystemAgent.getInstance().swfLoaderSecondSWF);
                SystemAgent.getInstance().currentSWFLoader = SystemAgent.getInstance().swfLoaderSecondSWF;
//will invoke from a button click
public function LoadSecondSWF():void
                SystemAgent.getInstance().swfLoaderSecondSWF.load(new URLRequest("Second.SWF"));
                SwitchSWFs();

Is the delay happening when you test locally?
One thing you might try is to load any Loaders you have up front before they are needed so that there is a better chance they are ready to be added to the display list when called for. So instead of having the button trigger loading the swf, you just have it call the switchSWFs function.
Another thing you might try if you keep it where the button triggers loading the file is to assign an event listener for the Loader to detect when it has finished loading and then have that listener's event handler function call the switchSWFs function. At least that way, the current swf is not unloaded until a replacement is ready and waiting.

Too much music?

Hi.
I've been trying to import all the music I have stored on my computer to iTunes, but somehow iTunes select only a part of it. Sometimes an error shows too, saying iTunes failed importing/copying :C-disc or something. Could it be that I have too much music for iTunes to handle? I've got all my music in the My Music-folder, and it's grown to about 12GB... A lot, but should that really be a problem?
I've tried importing files not choosing the 'import folder' but the other option, and I've read in this forum that in the old versions you could import several files in one go that way. I can only import one at a time. iTunes seems screwed up...
I could really need some help with this, because as it is now, my iPod is empty...

12 gigs is not too much for iTunes.
By any chance, if you look in Edit > Preferences > Advanced > General, do you have "Copy files to iTunes Music Folder..." checked? If so, uncheck it and try again. (If you are short of free hard drive space, that option will have trouble operating.)

Firefox uses too much memory

I've been using Firefox as the default browser on my systems (both Windows and Linux and in 32 or 64 editions) and for some reason Firefox consumes too much memory. Now trust me. I have a very fast machine and so I get very frustrated with this issue as it seems to be a Firefox only issue. Its true that I might have up to 40 tabs open at times but Chrome can handle it Safari can handle it and even Explorer can handle it. Sometimes Firefox's memory consumption peaks to an astonish 3GB of memory which is unheard of. My machine is so fast that I can have up to 10 programs open (Maya, Photoshop, Cinema 4d, Autodesk Suites MySql server and PHP5, MS Office) and still be able to work with them all at the same time, but Firefox crashes suddenly and that is very annoying as I've customized it to my needs adding extensions and making sure all my online baking is done using Firefox. This memory issue is far more noticeable when I'm using Windows 7 64 bits. The same amount of tabs and extensions opened on Linux have no effect on memory and I often switch to Linux just to be able to enjoy a smooth Firefox browsing experience. I've invested so much money into building an amazing machine and it takes 10 minutes of having Firefox running to crash it all completely. I've lost track of the amount of times I've lost my profile and had to rebuild all my customizations but I can stand that. What is beyond my comprehension is the fact that when I'm using Windows XP or Linux the memory used by Firefox is far lower than when I'm using Windows 7 or 8.1 .
Can you help me out? I really love Firefox and would like to keep using it as my default browser but can't afford losing my profile info every time Firefox crashes or having Windows Explorer crashing and losing all the work I'm doing on other software programs.
Much appreciated;
Sam

Are there any tabs reopened from the previous session when this happens?
Do you keep a large history?
You can check for problems with the places.sqlite database file in the Firefox Profile Folder.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Bookmarks_history_and_toolbar_buttons_not_working_-_Firefox
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Bookmarks+not+saved#w_fix-the-bookmarks-file
You can try to check and repair the places database with this extension:
*https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/places-maintenance/
Try to create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.
See "Creating a profile":
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues
There may be extensions and plugins installed by default in a new profile, so check that in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions & Plugins" in case there are still problems.
If the new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile, but be careful not to copy corrupted files.
See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox
You can also try to reset Firefox:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Basic+Troubleshooting

Is this video too much for my G4 Powerbook?

Hi,
I have downloaded a video from Vimeo and it won't play. At best it gets very choppy, even the audio, to the point where it just stalls.
I have a G4 powerbook, 15"
1.6GHz
2GB RAM
250GB hardrive (165GB free)
OSX 10.5.6
Quicktime Pro 7.6
The video is;
H.264 Decoder
1280x720
Millions
AAC
Data size 52.99MB
Data rate 6233.57kbits/s
Is this too much for my good old Mac?

Thanks Kirk, what a shame. I'd love a new Macbook Pro but I always said I would use my G4 till it fell to pieces, never thinking it would fail me in such a unremarkable way.
Might have to wait till the end of the summer though.....
Would you mind educating me somewhat. I wasn't sure from the details given in the Quicktime movie inspector whether the video was HD or not. The creator of the video shot it on a Canon Rebel XT SLR camera, in burst mode. That itself made me doubt it was HD, but Vimeo deals in HD footage so I just didn't know.
How did you deduce it to be HD, and what should I be looking for? How much data could my G4 handle?
Thanks again Kirk!

DVD Burn Error: too much motion menu content yet not much.

hi
Keep getting this when i try to burn my DVD, can anyone advise?
+- The following warnings and errors were found during the validation of the current project:+
+- There seems to be too much motion menu content in your project. Correct this problem before you continue burning this project.+
Message was edited by: Logic Pro

Perhaps you can elaborate a bit more. How many menus do you have in the project? In the scenes menus how many motion buttons do you have? How many differen audio files are you using in the menus? Of the files you dropped into motion menus/buttons, how long are those clips? How long are the various audio files you are using? ? ? ? ?? ????? ???????????
I can't see your project so I have no idea what you are already using and if what you have is clearly excessive or not.
Patrick

Camera Connection Kit - Accessory uses too much power

I am trying to import photos from my Kodak EasyShare M873 via the USB connector from the CCK. About a quarter of the way through the import, the iPad disconnects and states, "The attached accessory is using too much power". Is anyone else getting this. I suppose I could just remove the SD card from the camera everytime I want to import. But then what is the point of having the USB adaptor if the iPad can't handle connecting to a semi-low quality consumer camera?

The USB cable is great if the battery is full and you don't have a ton of photos, or if the camera either has photos in its "built-in" memory or doesn't use SD.
PERSONALLY I'm glad they included both, but plan to use only the SD adapter on trips.
Doug
PS: It might be interesting, though probably camera-specific, to compare transfers times both ways...

Can you overload iTunes w/too much music?

I have over 21000 tracks in my iTunes library, and I'm wondering if there is an upper limit of how many tracks iTunes can handle? My question is not regarding storage - I have an external drive with tons of space. My question is regarding the program itself - in recent months I have noticed that the program is running more and more slowly. It does not crash, but it tends to "think" more. Thanks in advance for any help.

I'm also trying to determine how large of a library iTunes can handle and how large some of the largest libraries out there are. I am currently running 46,000 items in my main library on the internal drive (total size around 340Gigs) and am having no problems at all with it. I have a couple of other separate libraries totaling around another 150GB that I'd like to combine with my main one currently at 340GB which would bring me up to about 500GB but have some concerns about how a library that big would perform.
I recently upgraded my 5 year old 1GHz iMac to a new 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme iMac with 2GB ram, mostly because my growing iTunes library was too much of a drag on the slower processor. Clearly the bigger the library the more processor power and ram you need.
I run my library off my internal 750GB drive and use Apple Backup to back up the entire internal drive weekly to a 1TB external drive, so I always have a recent copy in case of drive failure.
I'd like to know anecdotally how large other people's extra large libraries are -- is anyone successfully running libraries bigger than 500GB, 700GB, 1TB?? I imagine there are mega users out there or possibly people using iTunes for commercial or professional applications that require jumbo libraries.

Too much code in my answers report!

Hi experts!
I'm trying to do a report but there is too much code in my columns. So I have (Removed Column) in the condicionals. Anyway that's an error! Is there any place too change the maximum length of the code I can write?
Thanks for all!

Stateless session beans are usually faster, because each client's session is not stateful (therefore has to be handled by the container)
Have you done some performance measurements on your application?
Also, how are your session beans communicating with your entity beans?? Are you employing use of Local interfaces to communicate between session<-->entity? Do you have Value Objects that are being passed from session<-->entity? Using Value Objects between s<>e saves a lot of expensive remote calls (especially if you have to get/set a lot of fields)
Each of these seemingly little decisions can impact your performance greatly.
HTH,
-cedrick

How to tune the query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time...

how to reduce the execution time for the below query..."sum" operation is taking too much long time....
SELECT
B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,
SUM(DP_AD_CURR_BAL*D.ISIN_CLOSE_PRICE) Qty,
B.DP_NET_WORTH,
B.CMN_DP_FLAG,
B.RESTRAIN_TYPE ,
B.LETT_GENR_DATE,
E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH
FROM DPMADV0 A, PABRNCHDTLP0 B, PABANKCCYP0 D,PADPNETWORTHDTLP0 E,
(SELECT CID_NUMB FROM CFCUSTMASTD0
WHERE SUB_TYPE NOT IN (1,2,5,6,7,28,29,30,31,40,41,48,49,50,57,83)) C
WHERE A.DP_AD_BR_NBR = B.BRNCH_NUMB
AND A.DP_AD_CCY_CDE = D.CCY_ALPHA_CODE
AND A.DP_AD_ACCT_NBR = C.CID_NUMB
AND E.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE = B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE
AND SUBSTR(B.BRNCH_NUMB,1,3) like SUBSTR(:hvBrnchNumb,1,3)
AND ((B.DP_TYPE IN (2) AND B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE IN (10, 11)) or
(B.DP_TYPE IN (3) and B.DP_ACCOUNT_TYPE=11 ) )
AND B.DEL_FLAG = 'N'
AND B.DP_STATUS = 'A'
AND D.ISIN_STATUS = 'A'
GROUP BY B.DP_NET_WORTH,B.RESTRAIN_TYPE,B.DP_AVPS_STATUS,E.MAX_NET_WORTH,
E.MIN_NET_WORTH,B.CMN_DP_FLAG,B.LETT_GENR_DATE;

Hi,
please produce a plan with rowsource statistics (if not sure how, follow instructions in http://savvinov.com/2012/09/24/a-sqlplus-script-for-diagnosing-poor-sql-plans/) and post it using tags to preserve formatting.
Best regards,
Nikolay
P.S. I also suggest that you work on your open threads:
Handle:      946903
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Jul 16, 2012
Total Posts:      11
Total Questions:      5 (5 unresolved)

Too much memory consumed while my 3D scene is load and it becomes too slow

Sir
i have made a room in java 3D by using Box class and lighting etc.
i have converted the 3D Studio Max files (.3ds) into the .obj file and used the ObjectFile Loader to import it.
All things are imported well.
But the main problem arises when my scene is loaded and i revolve my camera in the room too much flickering comes in that.
I have also laoded textures on walls and objects.
Also it consumes about 80 to 90 Mb of memory space.
when i increase the objects memory also increases.
Tell me how i can handle this memory problem. and also to handle the flickering.
I want to use that room in applet and want to use it on net. So if this problem stills there then how clients should see it.
Please reply as soon as possible

Hello,
I don't know what geometric primitive is generated by the 3DSLoader.
In fact triangles are always better, graphic cards love them.
In particular TriangleStripArray primitive. (TriangleArray is slower !)
So, for a quick answer, I would suggest you to :
( - verify your graphic card driver, but I suppose it's OK )
- use OpenGL version of Java3d if it's not already the case
- take a look in 3DSLoader and see what primitive it is using ; It is possible to triangulate and stripifiate (see GeometryInfo and Stripifier) if the geometry do not match.
- verify if you can reuse memory in your scene (same Appearance for multiple objects for example)
Some performance considerations:
http://trapdoor.surak.com.au/~chris/home/java/j3d/PerformanceSutras.html
Best Regards and Goold Luck

My MBP mid 2014 is using too much RAM

My MBP mid 2014 is using too much ram on kernel task, and some others what can I do to fix this?

To add to Tim's excellent advice, look at my numbers for my quad-core i7 iMac with 12GB RAM installed:
As you can see, the system has reserved almost all the available RAM but the swaps are zero and the memory pressure is on the bottom of the scale. My computer runs very fast.
RAM handling in OSX changed with OS10.9 and continues in 10.10. The measures you were using only apply to Mac OSX 10.8 and older.
If your swaps move up into the Gig range, you are probably using a bunch of RAM. You cannot upgrade RAM in a 2014 Retina model so it behooves you to avoid third-party utilities like "FreeMemory," keep an eye on Safari extensions, and be frugal with your user login items (System Preferences > Users and Groups > {your account} > Login Items tab).

Too much clips to handle!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for