Toplink Version with Bug# 3617882 (SESSION NULL IN EXCEPTIONHANDLER)'s fix?

We're using Toplink v9.0.4.2 and are experiencing the same issue detailed in Bug# 3617882 on Metalink. According to this bug's status, it has been fixed in v9.0.4.4 (around July 2004 timeframe). I downloaded Toplink v9.0.4.5 installer from Oracle web site (http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/htdocs/904topsoft.html). But jars installed with that one are exactly the same as the ones we currently have in 9.0.4.2.
Where can I find the right Toplink Version that has this bug's fix? Please reply.
Thanks in advance,
-Manjula

Hello Manjula,
I would try getting the latest 9.0.4 TopLink patchset, which is 9.0.4.8 available from Metalink under patch# 4499114 .
When you ran the TopLink 10g installer, did you run with the jars it installed? If so, what was the version number it printed off in the logs? I have checked that the toplink.jar file installed is TopLink version 9.0.4.5, so I'm not sure what you mean when you say the jars are the same.
Best Regards,
Chris

Similar Messages

  • New update of Firefox, now my home page keeps changing with each new session. What's the fix?

    After Firefox performed an automatic upgrade, my home page and "Restore to Default" setting changed. I can input the correct URL and save and that works fine during that session. But when the browser is closed and brought back up again, it reverts to this different home page (my companies intranet page). I've tried changing the "home page default" setting in the browserconfig.properties file and did a find and replace of the wrong URL in the "pref.js" files. But it keeps going back to the wrong address each time a new browser session is started. This all happened after an automatic upgrade was done to bring Firefox to version 3.6.8.
    This has happened on both of my work computers that run Windows XP - SP 3, IE 7.0.573 and Symantec Antivirus. So I'd think the chances of both computers being hit by the exact some problem, at the exact same time, changing the home page to the exact same URL and neither of the computers' antivirus protection catching it are rather slim. But I suppose that's a possibility. However, since this happened immediately following the browser upgrade, I have to think that this new installation has something to do with it.
    Any suggestions?

    Did you look for a '''user.js''' file in your Profile folder?
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/User.js_file
    Prefs in that file will override the same pref in the prefs.js file on each Firefox startup.
    Have you contacted your IT department about that issue?
    Maybe they are overriding your homepage setting?

  • Toruble with dropped ARD sessions requiring a logout to fix

    I am having a major problem with ARD on my work Mac. It is a Rev A Intel iMac 17" running the latest ARD client.
    I was given the ARD admin to take home for telecommuting which I have installed on my PowerMac G5. I connect to my work Mac through a Cisco VPN (this VPN software is very buggy)
    Far too frequently while I am connected to the Intel iMac (curtained) I suddenly lose connection to the Mac. Whatever was on my screen at the time freezes in my ARD window. Closing the session reveals that the iMac still has a Locked Screen. I can unlock the screen but can never connect to it unless I log out. I've tried using the shell command kickstart to restart the ARD client and a variety of other things trying to bring it back but that actually causes much more damage and usually results in the need for a hard reboot (power cycle).
    The problem only seems to (or most frequently) occur when Mail is open. If I leave it closed I don't see this problem (maybe very rarely if ever). Of course without access to email what good is ARD in my situation? Other than that there doesn't seem to be any pattern.
    Anyone have any ideas? Need help badly!
    Josh

    Far too frequently while I am connected to the Intel
    iMac (curtained) I suddenly lose connection to the
    Mac. Whatever was on my screen at the time freezes
    in my ARD window. Closing the session reveals that
    the iMac still has a Locked Screen. I can unlock the
    screen but can never connect to it unless I log out.
    To clarify I must logout of the remote machine to enable a new ARD connection.
    I can use Manage -> Logout Current User in the admin. So most of the remote option are still functional just not a full Control.

  • Query caching issue with Toplink version 10.1.3.5.0

    We are in the process of upgrading the toplink version from 9.0.4.7 to 10.1.3.5.0
    We are finding an odd issue with insert statements generated for an aggregate collection mapping with addTargetForeignKeyFieldName.
    We have a Table Ticket and Table Task with Table Activity as a child for both.
    Table Ticket
    Ticket_Key (PK)
    Table B
    Task_Key (PK)
    Table C
    Activity_Key (PK)
    Task_Key (FK)
    Ticket_Key(FK)
    Notes
    Version
    Here are the mappings from
    Ticket Project
    AggregateCollectionMapping activitiesMapping = new AggregateCollectionMapping();
            activitiesMapping.setAttributeName("activities");
            activitiesMapping.setReferenceClass(com.common.Activity.class);
            activitiesMapping.dontUseIndirection();
    activitiesMapping.privateOwnedRelationship();
            activitiesMapping.useCollectionClass(java.util.ArrayList.class);
            activitiesMapping.addTargetForeignKeyFieldName("ACTIVITY.TICKET_KEY", "TICKET.TICKET_KEY");
    activitiesMapping.useBatchReading();
            descriptor.addMapping(activitiesMapping);
    Task Project:
    AggregateCollectionMapping activitiesMapping = new AggregateCollectionMapping();
            activitiesMapping.setAttributeName("activities");
            activitiesMapping.setReferenceClass(com.common.Activity.class);
            activitiesMapping.dontUseIndirection();
    activitiesMapping.privateOwnedRelationship();
            activitiesMapping.useCollectionClass(java.util.ArrayList.class);
            activitiesMapping.addTargetForeignKeyFieldName("ACTIVITY.TASK_KEY", "TASK.TASK_KEY");
    activitiesMapping.useBatchReading();
            descriptor.addMapping(activitiesMapping);
    The tickets and tasks with activities gets inserted in the same transaction.
    Here are the queries that what we get from the toplink version 9.x
    2013-10-29 10:30:50,582  - SELECT SEQ_ACTIVITY.NEXTVAL FROM DUAL
    2013-10-29 10:30:50,582  - INSERT  INTO ACTIVITY (TASK_KEY, VERSION, NOTES, ACTIVITY_KEY) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
    2013-10-29 10:30:50,582  - bind => [2900830, 0, Create Task, 8590870]
    2013-10-29 10:30:50,926  - INSERT  INTO ACTIVITY (TICKET_KEY, VERSION, NOTES, ACTIVITY_KEY) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
    2013-10-29 10:30:50,926  - bind => [326450, 1, Created Ticket, 8590860]
    Here are the queries generated from toplink version 10.x
    2013-10-26 23:31:10,426   SELECT SEQ_ACTIVITY.NEXTVAL FROM DUAL
    2013-10-26 23:31:10,430   INSERT INTO ACTIVITY (TASK_KEY, ACTIVITY_KEY,NOTES, VERSION) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
    2013-10-26 23:31:10,430   bind => [2900690, 8590500, Create Task, 0]
    2013-10-26 23:31:10,509   INSERT INTO ACTIVITY (TASK_KEY, ACTIVITY_KEY, NOTES, VERSION) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
    2013-10-26 23:31:10,510   bind => [null, 8590490, Created Ticket, 1]
    It appears like the new version of the toplink caching the prepared statements and it is not recognizing the targetForeignKeyFieldName mapping of the Ticket Project.
    Any help in resolving this issue is appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi James,
    1)Yes it supports IE 8 .Please review the below link for certification details on browers :-
        http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/as-certification-r2-101202-095871.html#BAJGCBEA
         Note: Oracle Application Server supports only those browsers.
    2)Forms only support Windows 7 32 bit only.
        Please refer to the note:1292919.1 "Certification of Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2) on Windows 7 (32-bit)"
    3)Could you provide more information of JVM because when you install 10gR2 it has JDK and JRE present in it.
    Regards,
    Prakash.

  • Bi publisher with new public session not working. Bug?

    Hello,
    I've got a problem with a bi publisher report I want to open from a url. I have a page 1 which is public, and I want to give the user following url to download the document:
       MYURL/pls/apex/f?p=MYAPP:1::PRINT_REPORT=MYREPORT:::MYVAR:1
    This gives me an empty page.
    When I first generate a new session by just going to page 1:
       MYURL/pls/apex/f?p=MYAPP:1 (which generates MYURL/pls/apex/f?p=MYAPP:1:1855219487679317)
    And then use the original url with the new session, it downloads the document:
       MYURL/pls/apex/f?p=MYAPP:1:1855219487679317:PRINT_REPORT=MYREPORT:::MYVAR:1
    Is this a know problem and is there a workaround?
    Regards, Jan

    Jan,
    This appears to be a bug. As a workaround, you can provide users with a link to a different public page and have that page do a before-header branch to your page 1, specifying the PRINT_REPORT=MYREPORT request value and the session item names/values in the branch definition. For example the link your users could use (to public page 2) might be:
    ..f?p=MYAPP:2
    Scott

  • Fatal bug with shared JDBC Session Persistence

    We are attempting to launch a three-tier site with two clusters, one at the
              web layer (JSP/servlet/images) and a separate cluster at the app server
              layer (EJBs). We are running WebLogic server 4.5.1 Service Pack 8 on Solaris
              2.7. In production we use Solaris JDK 1.2.1.04, and in development we use
              JavaSoft JDK 1.2.2. We are able to duplicate this problem with both JDKs. We
              are using the WebLogic kona/oracle driver for session persistence because
              the Oracle JDBC driver would not work for this purpose - we are using the
              Oracle OCI driver for our EJB persistence in a separate pool in the app
              server cluster.
              We attempted to configure our web cluster to work with in-memory session
              replication. We found the performance of the WebLogic proxy to be abysmal -
              causing a 5x to 10x performance degredation over shared JDBC persistence. We
              were running the proxy on WebLogic, which we were advised would be slow. Its
              performance is beyond slow, it is completely unusable and should NEVER be a
              recommended or even supported configuration. We do not wish to purchase
              separate licenses for iPlanet, refuse to run IIS in a production setting,
              and cannot use Apache until WebLogic 5.1, so we are stuck with shared JDBC
              persistence until we can upgrade to 5.1.
              Using JDBC session persistence with a shared persistent store amongst all
              the clustered web servers results in our users getting brand-new sessions
              populated with data from OTHER USERS' SESSIONS. This is very easy to
              replicate using the provided test JSP and java class. This behavior results
              in new users coming to the site and finding themselves logged in as other
              users.
              The test.jsp file simply accesses the session, prints out some information,
              and then adds a few values to the session. The JSP prints out the value of
              session.isNew(), the session's ID, and the number of values in the session
              space. If you hit this jsp with a new browser window, the session should be
              new, and the number of values should be zero.
              The test Java class hits a URL with this test.jsp file repeatedly, and
              checks to make sure that the session is empty. It keeps a counter of the
              number of hits which resulted in non-empty sessions and the total number of
              hits. Because this java class does not maintain cookie data of any kind and
              merely opens new HTTP connections, it should always receive a brand-new,
              non-empty session.
              When we set the JDBC session persistence property
              weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=true and run the test, we see
              periodically see the test.jsp file receiving a brand-new (session.isNew() =
              true), yet non-empty (session.getValueNames().length != 0) session. This is
              extremely bad behavior and makes the shared JDBC session persistence setting
              worthless. We were able to duplicate this behavior with both a single server
              and multiple servers in a cluster.
              If we set weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=false, then this test
              works fine. This also means that we cannot cluster web servers.
              To run the test, simply start a WebLogic instance using the provided
              properties file, put the jsp in the document-root somewhere, and then run
              SessionTest.java, providing the URL of the test JSP as the only command-line
              argument. You will need to modify the properties file to have the proper
              database settings and document-root. The java class will display a running
              tally of the number of hits, and the number of hits that result in
              non-empty, illegal sessions, with a total at the end.
              So, we are now in a position where we are completely unable to launch our
              site in a clustered, no-single-point-of-failure configuration. Obviously,
              clustering was one of the main reasons to choose WebLogic, and we are
              extremely distressed that we are unable to get this configuration to work.
              Any help would be appreciated.
              [web.standalone.properties]
              [SessionTest.java]
              [test.jsp]
              

    I hope this is not too far fetched, but we are expieriencing a similar
              problem with jms (messages are mixed up between queues). This happens only
              if we are using message persistence in an oracle db (everything works ok
              when we are not using persistent messages). Could it be that there is a
              serious bug in the jdbc code/oracle driver code or connection handling
              (regarding multi threading)? This would explain that, whenever you use
              persistence with oracle databases, messages/sessions (or other) are mixed
              up.
              - Falk
              "Grant Kushida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              > We are attempting to launch a three-tier site with two clusters, one at
              the
              > web layer (JSP/servlet/images) and a separate cluster at the app server
              > layer (EJBs). We are running WebLogic server 4.5.1 Service Pack 8 on
              Solaris
              > 2.7. In production we use Solaris JDK 1.2.1.04, and in development we use
              > JavaSoft JDK 1.2.2. We are able to duplicate this problem with both JDKs.
              We
              > are using the WebLogic kona/oracle driver for session persistence because
              > the Oracle JDBC driver would not work for this purpose - we are using the
              > Oracle OCI driver for our EJB persistence in a separate pool in the app
              > server cluster.
              >
              > We attempted to configure our web cluster to work with in-memory session
              > replication. We found the performance of the WebLogic proxy to be
              abysmal -
              > causing a 5x to 10x performance degredation over shared JDBC persistence.
              We
              > were running the proxy on WebLogic, which we were advised would be slow.
              Its
              > performance is beyond slow, it is completely unusable and should NEVER be
              a
              > recommended or even supported configuration. We do not wish to purchase
              > separate licenses for iPlanet, refuse to run IIS in a production setting,
              > and cannot use Apache until WebLogic 5.1, so we are stuck with shared JDBC
              > persistence until we can upgrade to 5.1.
              >
              > Using JDBC session persistence with a shared persistent store amongst all
              > the clustered web servers results in our users getting brand-new sessions
              > populated with data from OTHER USERS' SESSIONS. This is very easy to
              > replicate using the provided test JSP and java class. This behavior
              results
              > in new users coming to the site and finding themselves logged in as other
              > users.
              >
              > The test.jsp file simply accesses the session, prints out some
              information,
              > and then adds a few values to the session. The JSP prints out the value of
              > session.isNew(), the session's ID, and the number of values in the session
              > space. If you hit this jsp with a new browser window, the session should
              be
              > new, and the number of values should be zero.
              >
              > The test Java class hits a URL with this test.jsp file repeatedly, and
              > checks to make sure that the session is empty. It keeps a counter of the
              > number of hits which resulted in non-empty sessions and the total number
              of
              > hits. Because this java class does not maintain cookie data of any kind
              and
              > merely opens new HTTP connections, it should always receive a brand-new,
              > non-empty session.
              >
              > When we set the JDBC session persistence property
              > weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=true and run the test, we see
              > periodically see the test.jsp file receiving a brand-new (session.isNew()
              =
              > true), yet non-empty (session.getValueNames().length != 0) session. This
              is
              > extremely bad behavior and makes the shared JDBC session persistence
              setting
              > worthless. We were able to duplicate this behavior with both a single
              server
              > and multiple servers in a cluster.
              >
              > If we set weblogic.httpd.session.persistentStoreShared=false, then this
              test
              > works fine. This also means that we cannot cluster web servers.
              >
              > To run the test, simply start a WebLogic instance using the provided
              > properties file, put the jsp in the document-root somewhere, and then run
              > SessionTest.java, providing the URL of the test JSP as the only
              command-line
              > argument. You will need to modify the properties file to have the proper
              > database settings and document-root. The java class will display a running
              > tally of the number of hits, and the number of hits that result in
              > non-empty, illegal sessions, with a total at the end.
              >
              > So, we are now in a position where we are completely unable to launch our
              > site in a clustered, no-single-point-of-failure configuration. Obviously,
              > clustering was one of the main reasons to choose WebLogic, and we are
              > extremely distressed that we are unable to get this configuration to work.
              > Any help would be appreciated.
              >
              >
              >
              >
              

  • NullPointerException with Toplink version 9.0.4.4

    Dear All,
    We are using Toplink version 9.0.4.4 jar for one of our live application.
    Ours is a Java application connected to Oracle DB with the above mentioned toplink jar in the application server.
    Currently we are facing the following issue.
    java.lang.NullPointerException
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping.compareObjects(DirectToFieldMapping.java:154)
    at oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping.compareForChange(DirectToFieldMapping.java:136)
    We are not facing this issue on all scenarios. But unable to figure our when this issue is triggered.
    From one of the forum we saw that version 9.0.4.5 might solve this issue.
    We tried replacing the jar but the result is not fruitful. We still have the issue.
    On higher end this is how our Objects are mapped.
    Database Side
    ==============
    Employee - Primary Table
    Employee Details - Secondary table with relation to Employee table.
              One to many relation with Employee
    Java Side
    ===========
    Employee.java
    EmployeeDetails.java
    Employee.java contains list of Employee Details.
    Process Flow
    ==============
    1. Read the Employee details from the Database. Employee Object is populated and the same is used to Display the details
    in the application screen
    2. User modified the Emplohyee details in the Screen
    3. Build EmployeeAmendDTO from Employee Object along with the modified data from Screen using HTTPRequest object
    4. Read the Employee Object again from the DB and register it for Update.
    5. Logic has been written in Java to check EmployeeAmendDTO against Employee Object and populate Employee Object with
    additional information from the EmployeeAmendDTO.
    6. In this process the EmployeeDetails List within the Employee Object is also set.
         Code snippet from Employee Object
         EmployeeDetailsList.add(EmployeeDetails);
         EmployeeDetails.setEmployee(this);
    7. Employee Object which is registed for update should update the records.
    The code works very fine while we comment the EmployeeDetailsList.add(EmployeeDetails); code in java.
    But this is very much required as we need to save the Employee Details as well.
    Below is the relationship maintained for Employee and EmployeeDetails in Toplink.
    In Employee the EmployeeDetails are set in one-to-many relations where Bidirectional Relationship is enabled. In the EmployeeDetails bidirectional relationship is not enabled for EmployeeHolder which is holder for the Employeeobject.
    Note:- The application is in use since 2005 and we have just modified few code here and there to include new parametes to
    the Employee and EmployeeDetails.

    Hello,
    9.0.4.x is rather old and I'd recommend trying a later version such as 10 or 11 if possible. I'd also recommend filing a support case as they will probably need to go through the old and new mappings and the details of how you are building Employee and EmployeeDetails objects from EmployeeAmendDTO, which would be difficult to look at through a forum post.
    What will be needed is the full stack, the portion of the log that shows the app first reading in Employee and then trying to commit the changes with logging on finest (if possible). The error hopefully shows the mapings involved in the problem that may issolate which objects will need to be looked at.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Using Toplink Version 2.5.1 with Oracle 9i

    I am trying to find out if I can use an old version of TOPLink, version 2.5.1 with Oracle 9i.
    Has anybody deployed TOPLink 2.5.1 on Oracle 9i? Any input/help/documentation is appreciated.
    Thank you for your help in advance,
    Sc.

    Hi Srinivasa,
    As long as you chose a complient JDBC driver, there should be no problems.
    Darren

  • Any TopLink version compatible with WLS702?

    Is there any toplink version can compatible with WLS702? We have used TOPLink 903 and weblogic701, but want to upgrade to WLS702. When compile Entitybeans, get the following Error message:
    EmployeeBean_kt1qry__TopLink_CMP_1_1.java:16: com.mslv.sla.dao.bean.EmployeeBean_kt1qry__TopLink_CMP_1_1 should be declared abstract; it does not define __WL_getIsLocal() in EmployeeBean_kt1qry__TopLink_CMP_1_1
    Do you know how can we get ride of this error message?
    Thanks!
    Zuan Zhang
    Metasolv Software

    Zuan,
    We have already encountered this problem and have it patched for our upcoming 9.0.3.3 patch-set. This patch-set will be available on metalink.oracle.com in April. If you require this fix before then please contact support through metalink.
    FYI: As you can see the API for the abstract bean for which TopLink must generate a concrete subclass now has 2 additional methods. These methods were added to the default WLS CMP between 701 & 702.
    Cheers,
    Doug Clarke
    Product Manager
    Oracle9iAS TopLink

  • Which give higher performance  TopLink with CMP or session facade

    In our project we plan to use TopLink which one give higher performance
    TopLink with CMP
    Or TopLink with session façade
    thanks in advance

    Which give higher performance TopLink with CMP or session Bean

  • Java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Session: null does not exist

    These days I am getting an exception (java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Session: null does not exist) when I restart the weblogic managed server. I have a work around to get away with this error. I completely delete the dataspace from ALDSP console and redeploy the artifacts jar file. This is a tedious process. Can anyone suggest a permanent fix to resolve this issue.
    ALDSP version: 3.01
    Weblogic Server: 9.2.2
    Thanks.

    Hey ,Can you please help me?can you tell me how you resolved this issue.Our production is down due to
    java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Session: null does not exist.
         at com.bea.dsp.management.persistence.primitives.ServerPersistencePrimitives.getDataspaceRoot(ServerPersistencePrimitives.java:118)
         at com.bea.dsp.management.persistence.primitives.ServerPersistencePrimitives.getDataspaceRoot(ServerPersistencePrimitives.java:73)
         at com.bea.dsp.management.activation.ActivationService.dataSpaceAlreadyExists(ActivationService.java:342)
         at com.bea.dsp.management.activation.ActivationService.setRequestHandlerClassLoader(ActivationService.java:206)
         at com.bea.ld.server.bootstrap.RequestHandlerListener.postStart(RequestHandlerListener.java:46)
         Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace.
    Its urgent plz

  • Oracle Toplink Version issue

    Oracle Toplink Version
    Hi all,
    Can i know which version of toplink is stable?
    currently i am using toplink v9.0.3 for our project.i found in the same forum that there is a bug(#2662726) in v9.0.3 related to improper setting of target foreign key and a suggestion to use v9.0.3.2 where bug had been fixed.
    I am unable to find v9.0.3.2 download in oracle site.I found only the latest versions 9.0.4(10g product).I tried to install toplink 10g which is just an extraction of zip file,but i end up with the error "Windows cannot find '-Xmx128m' file" when i tried to start workbench.cmd
    I found somewhere that there is a work-around for that bug - just reversing the feild names of addTargetForeignKeyFeildName() method.
    I don't want to take risk.
    please suggest me correct stable versions and place of downloads of both App.server and toplink
    our Oracle Application server version is 9.0.3. if i am going to use the latest version of toplink,can it solve the issue mentioned above and also can it be compatible with app server version.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Karthick.

    Hi doug,
    Thanks for ur immediate response.
    I had installed the latest patchset 9.0.3.6 and tried to generate project java source using workbench.
    now the foreign key mapping problem is O.K. but i am having problems in the generated persistent classes code.
    I am having certain feilds in a table in Oracle Database of type Number of size varying from 1 - 6. I used workbench to generate code for that table. In that i found that all attributes which has direct to feild mapping to a Number datatype in Database is of type Double(irrespective of size even for Number(1)).
    I think it is a huge memory wastage having Double where an Integer or other types will do.
    I would be very grateful if u help me in this regards.
    -karthick.

  • I just order 8 calendars from iPhoto and they came to me fine. Now I need to order two more but when I go thru the process I get a message  saying:unable to assemble calendar. There is a probleme with the photo with the file name"(Null)"   more........ .

    Would someone be able to explain to me the following issue with Iphoto?
    I ordered 8 same calendars for my soccer team and received them fine. Although a couple of pictures on it are a little off (out of focus). I need to order two more of the same calendars but when I go thru the process ireceive an error message saying:
    "Unable to to assemble  calendar" There is a problem with the photo with the file name "(Null)" The full resolution version of this photo either cannot be located or is corrupt. Please replace this photo or delete it from your calendar.
    How can  I fine this "corrupt" photo? How did it go thru with the first batch of calendars but won't go thru now?
    Thank you for your help.   

    Apply the two fixes below in order as needed:
    Fix #1
    Launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down and rebuild the library.
    Since only one option can be run at a time start
    with Option #4 and then #1 as needed.
    Fix #2
    Using iPhoto Library Manager  to Rebuild Your iPhoto Library
    1 - download iPhoto Library Manager and launch.
    2 - click on the Add Library button, navigate to your Home/Pictures folder and select your iPhoto Library folder.
    3 - Now that the library is listed in the left hand pane of iPLM, click on your library and go to the File ➙ Rebuild Library menu option.
    4 - In the next  window name the new library and select the location you want it to be placed.
    5 - Click on the Create button.
    Note: This creates a new library based on the LIbraryData.xml file in the library and will recover Events, Albums, keywords, titles and comments.  However, books, calendars, cards and slideshows will be lost. The original library will be left untouched for further attempts at fixing the problem or in case the rebuilt library is not satisfactory.
    OT

  • ICal (Client) version with 10.6.2, intermittently loses "Refresh Frequency"

    iCal (Client) version with 10.6.2, intermittently loses "Refresh Frequency"
    10.6.2 SLS with 1.5 mo. new MacPro tower with 4 Cores (just bought)
    3GB RAM
    Network Homes
    Network Calendars (only, no published things, no busysync, all Apple Champagne)
    iCal Server enable
    Solid, fast network homes, logins quick, kick-*** OD implementation, very few beach balls, though they grow when I get all 12 delegates refreshing calendars every minute.
    Push turned off (it doesn't work as advertised, in my tests)
    Set iCal client to refresh each minute
    12 Read/Write Delegates for each of 13 workstations. (so, we're really expecting a lot, but not a lot, like in, we expect Exchange/Outlook robustness -- on open standards woo hoo)
    But yeah, the main symptom is that the ical client loses it mind (at some as yet undetermined interval) and stops refreshing. And the formerly trusting Calendar user, misses a meeting, because the change the delegate made to their calender didn't refresh and the Calendar user shows up an hour late, or misses the event entirely. That won't work.
    OK. back to what I've tried. (I haven't tried, but am considering it, moving to PHD)
    I have turned off PUSH. I hope that returns some server processing cycles.
    I have ( and this fixes it temporarily ) set their refresh frequency to manual. Close Prefs. Open Prefs, set back to 1 Minute. Close prefs. And that holds for a day (?) two days (?) I haven't gotten that far yet. I did that last night. And it saved me from having to remove and add the network calendar account. So, my remedy is down to about 40 seconds and 10 mouse clicks. Still annoying, and should work properly.
    Apple Enterprise support is being awesome. They send me the engineering capture tool and I am awaiting the symptom return. Then I run that app and it gobbles up lots of logs on an affected client workstation and the server. So, wish me luck, and send any thoughts or ideas along.

    This looks like a bug in the iCal client. I, too, have had problems with delegated calendars and end users mistaking events for being missing, not updated or incorrect only because their local copy was not synced with the true copy on the server. The refresh rate on delegated calendars can be changed with the "Refresh calendars: [ Every 1 minute ]" preference. You can verify this by right-clicking or control-clicking on the delegated calendar and choosing "Show CalDAV Queue." This brings up a queue of activity with the iCal Server. You'll note at the top that it mentions "Refresh every 1 minute."
    The problem, of course, is if you quit iCal and recheck the "Show CalDAV Queue" on the delegated calendar, the refresh interval has reverted to some long interval like 300 or 900 minutes. This is a bug, for sure. For now, you can tell your clients not to quit iCal or to refresh manually or reset the refresh interval whenever they restart iCal/their computer, etc.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 8968: sync api versions with flash runtime data

    Revision: 8968
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-07-31 13:18:19 -0700 (Fri, 31 Jul 2009)
    Log Message:
    sync api versions with flash runtime data
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/avmplus/ActionBlockEmitter.j ava
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/util/APIVersions.java

    Sorry to dig this out, but i just ran exactly into the same problem using a 7600GT. Reverting the appropriate libraries to 9.2.4 lead to a segfault in Compiz, deleting the libvdpau_nouveau files, however worked perfectly - thanks cro for the hint. But I guess, this is not a permanent solution, is there a better way to fix it? Maybe a bug report mentioning the problem would be of some use?
    Bug reported: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39975
    Last edited by PhotonX (2014-04-20 11:59:36)

Maybe you are looking for