TosBtMng.exe allways need's 50% of processor performance

Hello,
My English may by isn't very good.
I have a problem with the Toshiba Bluetooth Personal Area Network adapter in my other manufacturer notebook.
Allways when the bluetooth-manager TosBtMng.exe is running it takes 100% of the second part in my Intel Dual core processor.
I already updated the driver today, but the problem is still the same. I took that files from Fujitsu Siemens support.
Can get I newer one direct from Toshiba anywhere?
By searching the internet I found out, that some other have got the same problem, but nothing to fix.
Operating system is Windows XP SP2.
Can somebody help me?

I have an identical problem. We use Dell Latitude D830 laptops with a Dell wireless 360 module, which is a toshiba module. I have the orignal stack and the upgraded one and have tried both.
I did a ground up image and I noticed that the tosbtmng.exe would only tie up the CPU when logging onto the domain. It would do fine if i logged on the machine with a local account.
Any thoughts???

Similar Messages

BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe causes 100% CPU Load

I'm also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts looping and causes a CPU load of 100%.
This happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth Stack and current version (5.1.0.12).
The affected system is a Tecra S1, internal BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.
Installation of the BT-Stack went well and the notebook will boot succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other hints found in this forum, no success.
The lockup seems to happen at different times. Sometimes just after are reboot, clicking on the BT Tray symbol with the right mouse button. Then the context menu is shown just as white area, no entries. It may also trying to connect to an already paired device. If I kill the process with the task manager I can restart and it continues to work for some time.
As found in another thread here I have enabled API logging of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following while connecting with the Nokia PC Suite to my mobile Phone:
00042519 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM23
00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2 : Input Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo=00D9FE8C, plStatus=00D9FE84
00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=00000030(48)
00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=0000003F(63)
00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()
A new COM port is successfully created (COM23), and a few seconds later the CPU Load of TosBtMng goes up to 100%, but no API calls are performed. And if you wait long enough the phone gets connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.
Probably due to the high CPU load a next COM (COM24) port will be created sometime later and this process is then repeated again:
00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008007(32775), Size=00000041(65)
00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042743 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM24
00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
00042751 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042753 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042755 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042757 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042759 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
Maybe this helps to locate the origin of the CPU load problem of the Bluetooth Manager.
Thanks
Gerhard

I was having the same problem, and it turned out to be the Data execution prevention settings. I had turned on (System->Advanced->Data execution protection) the execution prevention for all programs, causing TosBTMng.exe to max out one processor core all the time. The solution was to add TosBtMng.exe to the list of exceptions and restart. I'd looked high and low for a solution - hope this helps someone else!

BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe hungs up on shutdown

Hi
I'm running a FSC-Notebook which came with the Toshiba BT-Stack. The notebook is in W-XP, SP2, MCE, kept up to date with patches from M$. I've installed the 5.10.12 BT-Stack. At Shut-Down the PC stops with a window that TosBTMng.exe isn't responding. (not ready) How can I fix this?
I was trying to hunt for the error with SysMon from M$ and I've seen that TosBTMng is trying to access Registry-Keys which are not present. The installation was correct, with no errors. Any ideas to keep this fixed? Thanks
Message was edited by: Touchscreen

I don't know if the link is up to date. Let's see what I have
Bluetooth
The stated entries without "from Toshiba" (the driver is Toshiba) plus Generic Bluetoth Radio
Networkadapters
Bluetooth Personal Area Network (without from Toshiba)
Com-Ports
BT Ports Com 15 - 22 and COM6, COM7. No other Com-Ports
No BT-entry in system-devices
No BT-USB-Controller
My laptop isn't equipped with ISDN

Receiving error message fixcfg.exe--says needs to close

receiving error message fixcfg.exe--says needs to close...how do I fix??

hello doggiebag, this is no executable that is part of firefox - a search on the internet reveals that it might belong to avg security software. if you use avg on your pc, it's best to contact the support of this company...

Trying to get icloud, installed snow leopard, now it says I need OSX, but my processor isn't right for it. Is this possible? Do I need to buy a nw computer? will I loose all my mobile me storage?

Trying to get icloud, installed snow leopard, now it says I need OSX, but my processor isn't right for it. Is this possible? Do I need to buy a nw computer? will I loose all my mobile me storage?

You will lose the entire contents of your iDisk whether or not you migrate to MobileMe as there is no equivalent in iCloud and MobileMe will be terminated at the end of June. You will need to download any data which you don't have on your Mac already.
Snow Leopard is not compliant with iCloud and most of the facilities will not work. You can migrate from MobileMe to iCloud at http://me.com/move even with Snow Leopard: when asked to confirm that your Mac is running Lion just lie and say 'yes'. Of course you won't be able to access iCloud directly from your Mac.
If you have MobileMe mail set up to collect mail from external POP accounts you should cancel this before migrating, or you may find it still working in iCloud (where it isn't supposed to) and with no way of stopping it.
This will be the situation with Snow Leopard when you have migrated:
Your email, calendars, and 'Find my iPhone' will be migrated to iCloud. Contacts and Bookmarks cannot be migrated from a Snow Leopard Mac.
Your iDisk, together with website hosting and Gallery, will continue to work as before until next June.
Syncing of Dashboard Widgets, Dock Items and Keychains between Macs, and Mail Accounts, Mail Rules, System Preferences, Signatures & Smart Mailboxes between Macs & iOS devices, will cease altogether.
You will be able to access email and calendars on the iCloud website at http://icloud.com provided your browser is reasonably up-to-date.
You will not be able to sync contacts or bookmarks from a pre-Lion Mac.
You will be able to enter the server settings for email manually in the Mail application and access your email.
You will not be able to sync your calendars directly.
Some people have been able to set up calendar syncing by using the method detailed here - this is an unsupported hack and may not be reliable, and may stop working at some future point.
There appears to be no method of syncing contacts (though Address Book on a Mac can be synced with Google or Yahoo address books - I don't know how reliable this is).
There are a couple of third-party solutions which may be of interest.
BusyCal is an iCal-like calendar application with extra facilities: it can sync with the iCloud Calendar while running on Leopard, Snow Leopard or Lion. A single user licence (two machines allowed) is $49.99.
Soho Organizer can sync Calendars and Contacts with iCloud on Leopard, Snow Leopard and Lion. A single user licence (multiple machines allowed) is $99.99.

I need to replace my processors....how?

I need to replace my processors on my G5.
I already purchased the replacement processor, I just need instructions on how to do it.
Can anyone help?

Whoever knows how to do a replacement for, please post it here.
Interestingly, I rand the Apple Hardware Test on my G5 (A CD that came with the computer). I ran the Quick and Extended versions. The Hardware Profile tab says I have a 2xPowerPC,G5 @1.8 GHz. So that must mean it's still reading two processors. By the way the fans have been blowing full blast for over an hour while it did these tests. So I restarted and now the darn thing is showing 2 processors (in Utilities=Activity Monitor). What happened? It "fixed" itself???
After starting up and waiting a minute, the G5 froze up. Then I got the gray screen telling me to restart.
I restarted. Then it froze up after I entered my login screen.
I force quit and restarted. Got past the login. Activity Monitor shows 2 processors. Got a dialog box: The computer was restarted after Mac OS X quit unexpectedly. I clicked "Report." Here's what it read:
Unresolved kernel trap(cpu 0): 0x300 - Data access DAR=0x0000000000000073 PC=0x000000000003468C
Latest crash info for cpu 0:
Exception state (sv=0x5D0DB000)
PC=0x0003468C; MSR=0x00001030; DAR=0x00000073; DSISR=0x40000000; LR=0x000347DC; R1=0x446CBD50; XCP=0x0000000C (0x300 - Data access)
Backtrace:
0x04CE7CC0 0x000347DC 0x00034540 0x000A9714
Proceeding back via exception chain:
Exception state (sv=0x5D0DB000)
previously dumped as "Latest" state. skipping...
Exception state (sv=0x00D7D000)
PC=0x00000000; MSR=0x0000D030; DAR=0x00000000; DSISR=0x00000000; LR=0x00000000; R1=0x00000000; XCP=0x00000000 (Unknown)
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC
panic(cpu 0 caller 0xFFFF0003): 0x300 - Data access
Latest stack backtrace for cpu 0:
Backtrace:
0x000954F8 0x00095A10 0x00026898 0x000A8204 0x000ABB80
Proceeding back via exception chain:
Exception state (sv=0x5D0DB000)
PC=0x0003468C; MSR=0x00001030; DAR=0x00000073; DSISR=0x40000000; LR=0x000347DC; R1=0x446CBD50; XCP=0x0000000C (0x300 - Data access)
Backtrace:
0x04CE7CC0 0x000347DC 0x00034540 0x000A9714
Exception state (sv=0x00D7D000)
PC=0x00000000; MSR=0x0000D030; DAR=0x00000000; DSISR=0x00000000; LR=0x00000000; R1=0x00000000; XCP=0x00000000 (Unknown)
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC
Model: PowerMac7,3, BootROM 5.1.8f7, 2 processors, PowerPC G5 (3.0), 1.8 GHz, 4 GB
Graphics: GeForce FX 5200, GeForce FX 5200, AGP, 64 MB
Memory Module: DIMM0/J11, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330
Memory Module: DIMM1/J12, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330
Memory Module: DIMM2/J13, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330
Memory Module: DIMM3/J14, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330
Network Service: Built-in Ethernet, Ethernet, en0
PCI Card: usb, usb, SLOT-4
PCI Card: usb, usb, SLOT-4
PCI Card: pcie55,2928, SLOT-4
Serial ATA Device: ST3250823AS, 232.89 GB
Serial ATA Device: WDC WD5000AAKS-00YGA0, 465.76 GB
Parallel ATA Device: SONY DVD RW DW-Q28A
USB Device: Hub in Apple Pro Keyboard, Mitsumi Electric, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 500 mA
USB Device: Apple Pro Keyboard, Mitsumi Electric, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 250 mA
USB Device: PTZ-630, Tablet, Up to 12 Mb/sec, 500 mA
FireWire Device: unknown_device, unknown_value, Unknown
FireWire Device: unknown_device, unknown_value, Up to 400 Mb/sec

Infamous WHINE & lack of Processor Performance settings?

I have owned all of the Al books from the 1ghz 17" to the 1.67 17". I noticed the whine first on the 15" 1.25 AlBook 2 yrs ago. During that time we were able to throttle the Processor settings ourselves via the Energy Saver setting in System Preferences. As of the release of the 1.67 AlBooks that option is no longer available. When the Processor Setting was set to Automatic, the AlBooks ALAWYS had the WHINE & HISS from under the keyboard in the same spot the MacBook Pro's demonstrate today.
I called Apple Tech support this afternoon and spoke to a tier 2 "guy". I asked about Speedstep / Processor throttling and that option being taken away from us - his reply was that the new processors control that now and are able to go from reduced settings to highest in a fraction of a second never noticed by the user. WRONG ANSWER. What he's telling me is the Processor is ALWAYS set to AUTOMATIC and we can't do anything about that. While his answer may be true, these units have the same whine & hiss as the previous AlBooks when set to Automatic. THIS IS A PROBLEM.
I do want that option BACK on my portable!!! It was nice knowing that if I was only wanting to watch a DVD on battery power that I could ensure low power consumption by going to the Energy Saver and setting the processor performance to "Reduced" or to always have it set to Highest if so desired. I have never been able to set the processor performance to Automatic and NOT hear the whine & hiss.
I have the 2.0ghz MacBook Pro w/ 2g RAM. I do not hear the whine whie the unit is plugged in - but on batter power it's very very loud. I could be wrong, but past experiences have proven that the automatic setting which WE ALL HAVE BY DEFAULT on our MacBook Pro's will produce this unwanted noise. This is an amazing laptop. But I am feeling a bit gimped having those settings taken away.
PJ
MacBook Pro & Dual 2.7 G5 Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Since when does people saying something is so make it so? I'm curious; exactly how many people does it take to repeat some random statement before it automatically becomes fact?
And no, what I said was not meant as a flame. I just wanted to explain why it is hard to take the post seriously. Apparently you took what I said in the opposite way I'd intended. That being said, I did not mean it that way, so sorry for any offense.
Of course a support forum is going to be filled with posts about problems. What would you say is more likely to compel you to make a thread in a support forum, a problem (of any sort), or no real reason at all, just for kicks? Granted , when a product first comes out, there will be a few "I love my MBP!" type threads, but those go away after awhile. The complaints remain, because, let's face it, life is full of problems, and computers have more than their share as a whole.
The reason it's important that this is your first post is that is isn't very hard to imagine people registering to stir up controversy, goof around, or incite even more inflammatory responses (read: troll), when ANY new product is released. My post wasn't accusing you of any of this, merely trying to explain (beforehand) some responses you may get later on.
My only advice is that if you are unsatisfied with your machine, exchange it for a new one. If a noisy screen/processor/speaker is enough to make you reconsider your purchase entirely, then perhaps it would be wiser to wait until this particular issue has been ironed out on Apple's end (certainly not a terrible idea).
I do understand where you are coming from with the processor settings, by the way, and I do miss those settings at times, mostly because I'm a control freak. However, I am assuming that the MBP uses Intel's speed-step technology, and I don't know of a way to manipulate that, so it looks like that little feature is gone. It very well could be at the root of the noise issues, but at this point, that is only speculation.
MBP Mac OS X (10.4.5) 2GHz, 2GB RAM, 256MB ATi, 100GB/7200rpm HDD

Need help in optimising the performance of a query

Need help in optimising the performance of a query. Below is the query that is executed on TABLE_A, TABLE_B and TABLE_C with record counts as 10M, 10m and 42 (only) respectively and it takes around 5-7 minutes to get 40 records:
SELECT DISTINCT a.T_ID_, a.FIRSTNAME, b.T_CODE, b.PRODUCT,
CASE WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +90 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -90 WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +30 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -30 ELSE 0 END AS T_DATE FROM TABLE_B b
INNER JOIN TABLE_A a ON (a.T_ID_ = b.T_ID_) LEFT JOIN TABLE_C c ON b.PRODUCT = c.PRODUCT
WHERE b.STATUS = 'T' AND (b.TYPE = 'ACTION'
AND ( TRUNC(b.DATE) + 1 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) ) ) AND b.PRODUCT = 2;
Note: Indices on the join columns are available in the respective tables
Please let me know if there is any better way to write it.
Edited by: 862944 on Aug 18, 2011 9:52 AM

862944 wrote:
Need help in optimising the performance of a query. Below is the query that is executed on TABLE_A, TABLE_B and TABLE_C with record counts as 10M, 10m and 42 (only) respectively and it takes around 5-7 minutes to get 40 records:
SELECT DISTINCT a.T_ID_, a.FIRSTNAME, b.T_CODE, b.PRODUCT,
CASE WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +90 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -90 WHEN TRUNC(b.DATE) +30 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) THEN -30 ELSE 0 END AS T_DATE FROM TABLE_B b
INNER JOIN TABLE_A a ON (a.T_ID_ = b.T_ID_) LEFT JOIN TABLE_C c ON b.PRODUCT = c.PRODUCT
WHERE b.STATUS = 'T' AND (b.TYPE = 'ACTION'
AND ( TRUNC(b.DATE) + 1 = TRUNC(SYSDATE) ) ) AND b.PRODUCT = 2;
Note: Indices on the join columns are available in the respective tables
Please let me know if there is any better way to write it.
Edited by: 862944 on Aug 18, 2011 9:52 AM[When Your Query Takes Too Long|https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]

No Automatic Processor Performance Setting

I am the new owner of a refurbished 17" Powerbook G4, 1.67GHZ, Dual Layer Superdrive. On my previous Powerbooks, in the energy saver control panel there always was the option for Automatic Processor Performance Setting, where one could set the processor to reduced, automatic or highest. On this new machine, there is no Automatic Processor Performance Setting! Any explanation?
Powerbook G4 17" 1.67GHZ Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2GB RAM, 160GB 128MB VRAM DL SuperDrive

Thanks again, I found the answer in the Developer notes here: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/DeveloperNotes/Macintosh_CPUs-G4/17inchPowerBookG4/1Overview/chapter_2_section_6.html#//a ppleref/doc/uid/TP40003166-CH205-TPXREF115.
Powerbook G4 17" 1.67GHZ Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2GB RAM, 160GB 128MB VRAM

Need help in analyzing the performance aspects of compounding

Hi all,
i am analyzing the performance aspects of compounding.
can anyone guide me about how do i go about?

when i displayed this table, it is showing some timestamps and validity period for the queries. i am having some difficulty in understanding this table details.
can u please guide me regarding this ?
also can anyone please help me on how do i analyze the OLAP processor performance for the queries that use compounding?

Need ur valuable suggestions on performance in sap BI

Hi All,
Hope every one is doing great. Need ur valuable suggestions on performance in SAP BI.
1. what is meant by DB partitioning, in which scenario we use it and what the steps to do this task.
2. Navigational attributes are use when v want to make use of this attr in reporting with certian actions. My question is do navigational attributes improves the performance if so how and if not what are the draw backs.
3. Multiprovider are use to access the data from different infoprovider to generate the reports.
In what way multiprovider inproves the performance??
4. Number Range buffering when it is used what r the steps has to follow ??
5. what is the procedure to calculate the DB statistics. what are the technical conents v install for this, when we install this befor the development are after completion of the developement and in what way they are helpfull to measure the performance.
Thanks in Advance
KK

1. what is meant by DB partitioning, in which scenario we use it and what the steps to do this task.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/33/dc2038aa3bcd23e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
2. Navigational attributes are use when v want to make use of this attr in reporting with certian actions. My question is do navigational attributes improves the performance if so how and if not what are the draw backs.
Nav Attribute:-
The dataflow performance/space is affected in the infoobject load, since the sid tables is growing with navigational attributes
The dataflow performance/space is not affected in transactional data (except for the aggregates).
So every navigationa attribute in an infoobject can be added to the infocubes without any cost.
The performance in query is affected, but the solution is simple: do not use!
Please check the following thread:
Re: Navigate Attribute
3. Multiprovider are use to access the data from different infoprovider to generate the reports.
In what way multiprovider inproves the performance??
--THis causes performance degradation as OLAP has to divide the query in many sub-queries.
4. Number Range buffering when it is used what r the steps has to follow ??
5. what is the procedure to calculate the DB statistics. what are the technical conents v install for this, when we install this befor the development are after completion of the developement and in what way they are helpfull to measure the performance.
--For DB Statistics :
Ref : SAP Note No: 588668
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/19/f832ac5d4611d4aa1500a0c9430730/content.htm

Processor Performance??

I read a discussion on mac gaming (http://discussions.info.apple.com/webx?128@@.68adc78a) It says that for certain games, an idea is to change something called processor performance. I am currently on my dads G4 Power mac as my imac has not arrived yet but in system preferences i cannot find anything about the processor (i even did the search using spotlight in system pref.) is this something that is only accessable on the G5 imac or do i find it somewhere else?
Thanks in advance
Adi

This option was added to the operating system for laptops. Setting the performace to lowest results in increased battery life and less heat. It only shows up for G5s and it's usually only changed once on a desktop system.
I'm waiting for "ultra-fastest" and "frackin-fastest" to be added to the drop down menu in 10.5

How can one decide which queries need BIA to enhance their performance?

How can one decide which queries need BIA to enhance their performance?

Queries with high data access times will usually require BIA. This can be found by using the Event IDs...
Please do not post across forums - your earlier post was deleted as duplicate.
Also search the forums before posting... this question has been answered earlier...
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on May 5, 2009 7:24 PM

[help] can't find "processor performance" option in the energy saver

hello....i've just bought my new macbook white 2.0 Ghz. the Mac OS version is 10.5.6
*i can't find any option to change my processor performance* on the "energy saver preferences"....here is the screenshot
it's odd when compared to the screenshot from apple support page
http://km.support.apple.com/library/APPLE/APPLECAREALLGEOS/HT3092/HT30923b.jpg
please help me on this, i can't perform image editing well when the battery get low....thanks a lot

On PowerPC machines, there is an option specifically for Processor Performance, while on Intel machines, the only option is for the entire computer - Better Energy Savings, Normal, Better Performance, or Custom. These can be selected for both on power adapter and battery and affect not only the processor, but also the display, sleep, and hard drive.
On 10.5.6, part of the update removed the option to change power settings from the menu bar drop-down menu - perhaps that is what you are looking at.

"Processor performance" preference change not taking?

I'm used to keeping my "processor performance" at "reduced" most of the time, unless I'm doing something cpu-intensive like encoding. Lately I've noticed that changing from "reduced" to "highest" (in preferences / energy saver / options) has no affect. (I can tell because my fans don't ramp up as they do when the processor is being taxed.)
Anyone else experience this?

NO, but I can speculate why. The power is more evenly distributed, like the PRAM, NVRAM. It really makes sense spreading the power around like OSx does by default.I think your new method is better for your system over the long hall.'''
Peace,
Ray

TosBtMng.exe allways need's 50% of processor performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for