Total Planning run (Scope of Planning)

Hello All
I am having a scenario wherein under a plant there are three divisions A, B & C. Divisions A & B falls under PP but Division C falls under PS. Now what I want is that how to plan the first two divisions A & B with total planning, cos i dont want to include Division C as for this division MRP would be run at Project level. Do I have to create MRP areas for these two Divisions A & B? Can you guide me out of this issue. Your inputs and guidance shall be appreciated.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Thanks for your input YMReddy & Dharma,
I shall explain this thing again that there is a plant 1200 in which I am having three division A, B & C. C-Division is under PS, & Divisions A & B are under PP. What I want that I have to plan the materials under PP seperately under the total planning, becuase for Division-C MRP is run for Project.
I intended that I would create the different MRP Area for Division C, becuase by doing so at plant level this MRP area would be not considered, and when am running MRP for the plant 1200, it would only consider remaining Divisions A & B.
Initially, the plant MRP area includes the plant with all its storage locations and stock with subcontractors. When you have defined MRP areas for storage locations and for subcontractors and you have assigned the materials, the plant MRP area is reduced by exactly this number of subcontractors and storage locations, as they are now to be planned separately.
Please let me know if am going in the right direction. Waiting for your valuable inputs.
YMReddy please throw some more light on the inputs you have provided, and I would appreciate if you look into the input which am thinking of and provide your inputs as well, as in why it wont be useful this way. Your inputs shall be highly appreciated Thanks again YMReddy.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Similar Messages

Scope Of Planning

Hi All
We are using central planning and have defined the scope of planning in configuraton . We have also defined parallel processing .
But we can only see scope of planning field in MD01. We cannot see it in MD02. I beleive MD01 is for planning for single level only . We need to run the planning for single item , multilevel .
Can any one give me step by step procedure for executing the scope of planning run with the settinngs. Thanks
Kind Regards
Ayaz

Dear ,
MRP can be run Singel Item , Singel Level in MD03 that means materila can be planned individual level in this txn .Where as MD01-MRP Run means total planning irrespective of Plant , MRP Area , MRP Controller , Storae Loaction or Group of any combination at lowest level of the materail ( Lowest BOM level or Lowest Code ) .That's why in MDO1 , there is an option called Scope Of Planning through which you can plan matyerials in multiple location ( plant , storage loaction , MRP area etc ) based on the BOM structure ( singel level or Multilevel ) .
But in MD02-Singel Item , Multilevel means individual item having BOM , can be planned along with dependenet at its lowest level .So here you can not run MRP at group of plant or other combination as like MD01.But you have option to run at product group level where materials are includede under a product group.
So there is no such set up to run Scope Of planning in MD02 .
Hope it is clear
Regards
JH

Regenerative planning run in APO

Hi experts,
I need your input on the following scenario.
We have APO PPDS implemented for our Manufacturing industry client. We have designed to run only Net Change Planning every day and there is no design to run Regenerative Planning.
What is the importance of running Regenerative Planning? What do we lose if we don't run a regenerative planning?
We have CTP scenario, so there are lot of parts planned automatically.
Is there any impact of automatic planning on Regenerative planning and vice versa?
What is the best practice to follow with respect to Regenerative Planning?
I appreciate if someone could answer these questions. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manimaran M.

Hello Mani
Following are details are from old SAP Handbook, good information to understand the concept.
====
Net Change Planning
Automatic material requirements planning is especially hard on system performance for production processes with complicated BOM structures. To guarantee frequent planning runs of those materials which are relevant for planning despite this problem, you can carry out the planning run with the "net change planning" procedure. This process only plans those materials which have undergone a change relevant to material requirements planning (for example, change in a production order due to excessive scrap, a new sales order, and so on) since the last planning run.
The so-called planning file exists especially for the planning run and contains all the materials and their respective MRP types. If a material is changed in a way that is relevant to the planning run, it is given a net change indicator meaning that it will be included in the next net change planning run. In a net change planning run, only these materials are planned.
Net Change Planning in the Planning Horizon
Performance can be improved even further by using the net change planning run in the planning horizon. Here, only those changes relevant to requirements planning that fall within a specific period (defined by the user and known as the planning horizon) are included in the planning run. It is advisable in this situation to carry out a total planning run in regular intervals (for example, weekly or monthly) to keep the planning results completely up-to-date.
Regenerative Planning
It is also possible to carry out a regenerative planning run. In this planning run, the system plans all materials that are relevant for planning. Usually, the regenerative planning run is only carried out in the implementation stages.
===
Hope this will help.
Thank you
Satish Waghmare

Planning Run through MD01

I was trying to take planning run for several plants,
made necessary config in spro, but unable to generate plan orders,
when i taking planning run through MD02, Plan order for material is generated, Kindly help me to find where i have missed the settings, no error is cooming when i am taking planning run

Hello Abhay,
MD01 is not advisable to run for all plants (if you are working with scope of planning). Run the same from MDBT transaction in background and check the spool log once this MRP finish...This will be better advisable from SAP. here you will come to know which materials are planned or which are not.
1) Check the controller parameters are same of your MD02 and MD01 to create planned orders.
2) Check indicator 3 delete and recreate data in controller parameter for MD01.
3) Check planned all components from the sane screen.
4) Run with regenerative planning if it is first time.
Run the job from SE38 with variant to create plannig file entries for all parts in plants.
Check whether MRP area activate check box is active or not in customizing...check the same whether plant level MRP indicator activated in customizing.
Please let me know whether your problem is solved. Thanks
Regsrds...
TAJUDDIN

Storage location exclusion from planning run

Hi All
I have excluded material from planning run by putting storage location exclusion indicator in MMSC for material.
Iam using kanban replenishment.
In material master, production storage location is same as that of put in MMSC.
I have created Planned independent requirement in MD61, when i do MRP system created planned order.
Please inform if storage location is excluded from MRP in MMSC then why system is considering requirement for that material at that storage location.

Hi Krishna
Please read help for Storage location MRP indicator
Storage location MRP indicator
Indicator that you use to exclude storage locations from material requirements planning at plant level.
If you do not set this indicator, stock, requirements, and receipts are included in MRP at plant level.
Use
You can exclude storage locations from MRP at plant level in one of two ways:
By excluding storage location stock from MRP
If storage location stock is excluded from MRP at plant level, no receipts for this storage location will be created in the planning run.
By planning storage location stock separately
If storage location stock is planned separately, the storage location is replenished with goods if the stock falls below the reorder point.

Why overdued pr is not deleted during DRP planning run in APO?

the PR information still contain external PR created in DRP planning mode and it was not deleted.
I am doubt about that the planning run in ROP planning mode cannot delete old PR before recalculating PR.

I found the root cause of this symptom and have a plan to fix them.
The root cause of it is that DRP planning run has not performed successfully.
1. Details.
For material: P174552
This material’s BOD hierarchy is
4860 (Reorder point based)
└ 6000 (Reorder point based)
└ 6080 (Period based)
For both 4860, 6000 Reorder point based planning mode, but for 6080 Period Based planning mode.
This 6080’s Period based is incorrect because this material’s ABC grade is ‘N’; it should be Reorder point based.
As you see it in below screen-shot, there is error log in DRP planning for this material.
I found that about 5% of materials has incorrect planning mode.
2. Fixing Plan:
This weekend I will recalculate all material’s planning mode again and
will Run DRP planning process chain in monthly job again.

PPDS Planning run

Hi Gurus,
I had created in APO for my test planning run
1. Location
2. Products
3. Resources
4. PPMs
5. Stratergic profiles
I had run my heuristic plan in rrp3 at finished product level, it had generated planned orders.
My question is what about my SF( semi finished products) and raw materials requirements?
Do i need to run even for SF and Raw materails?
Please let me know if had done anything wrong
Please any one can help me giving step by steps how we need to configure Detail scheduling with finit planning run?
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
You can plan Finished Goods (FG's), SFG's and RM's in APO and PP/DS. Of course, typically you only want to plan critical materials in APO that are constrained and have long lead times / expensive.
The following are the steps that you can try to run planning run including all FG's, SFG's and RM's.
Identify PP/DS heuristic that best meets your planning planning needs.
Use transaction code /SAPAPO/CDPSB0 (Planning run in foreground) or /SAPAPO/CDPSB1 (Production Planning run in the Background) to run planning for all the products in a single shot i.e. FG's, SFG's, RM's
In the first step, run low-level code heuristic before you run actual planning run heuristic. Low-level code will determine the lowest level a product will appear in all the PPM's in a given location. For example, if an SFG is appearing in the 1nd level in one BOM and same SFG is appearing in 2nd level in another BOM, then low-level code for this SFG is 2 (Low level code for a finished good is 0). Once low-level code heuristic is run, you can evaluate the results in transaction code /SAPAPO/RRP_NETCH and see if low-level codes are calculated correctly. Low-level codes will ensure the planning run happened in the sequence FG's planning first <followed by> SFG's planned next <followed by> RM's i.e. system runs planning for low-level code '0' products first <followed by> low level code '1' products <followed by> low level code '2' and so on......ok...that's enough on low-level codes.
In the second step in the planning run, use the heuristic that you want to run for planning all FG's, SFG's & RM's and include all products together in the selection criteria. No need to split and create selections for FG's planning run in to one step, SFG's in to next step and RM's in to another step. All can be included in one step and the low-level code will ensure the planning happened in sequence.
In case, if you run planning run for one FG product in it's Product View and you want the dependent requirements to be covered immediately i.e. dependent planned order's created immediately, use the "planning procedure = 3 cover dependent requirements immediately" in the PP/DS tab of product master for SFG's and RM's. This will ensure that as soon as the system see's dependent demands for SFG's and RM's, it will immediately create planned orders to cover them. This planning procedure is typically used to meet 'CTP' (Capability to Promise) requirement.
Low-level code heuristic - SAP_PP_020 (Stage-Numbering Algorithm)
MRP Planning run - SAP_MRP_002 (Product Planning (Plan Comp. Immdiately)
Good luck.

Scope of Planning for Total Planning

Hi SAP Gurus,
My Client Scenario is as follows
They import Spare Part materials from abroad to a Main Warehouse (defined as Plant in SAP) and then do stock transfer to around 60+ warehouse in different states (each defined as Plant in SAP).
At any time Stock exists in any of 60+ Plant and Main ware house Plant. However Purchase requirement and Purchase Order is created and placed from Only Main Warehouse Plant.
Now I am implementing Consumption based Planning with MRP. I am Planning to define a Scope of Planning for Total Planning.
Clarification I request :
1. Whether I need to define Only all 60+ Plants in Scope of Planning or can I include Main warehouse Plant also ?
2. In which case if there is requirement in one individual Plant and there exists stock in another one Plant - whether system will automatically create stock transfer Planned order. What Special procurement type I need to define for this (If it is 40 , whether I need to define any Issuing Plant, since I have 60 + Plants)
3. If I have to run Forecast and Planning run daily for 60+ Plants and weekly for Main warehouse Plant, Whether I need to create a Separate Scope of Planning for 60+ Plants and a Separate Variant for Main ware house Plant with different Schedules - Am I correct
Thanks and Regards,
R.Velmurugan.

Hi Kumar,
Thanks for your immediate response.
If we define Special procurement type 40 for 60+ warehouse Plants materials with Supplying plant as Main Warehouse Plant, then if there exists stock in one of 60+ Plants and there is requirement in one of another 60+ plants how system will consider and create stock transfer between them.
Whether stock transfer between 60+ as well as Main plant is Possible ? If possible how to define Special Procurement type ?
Secondly what ever issued from 60+ Plants is the real Consumption of Material (as Material issued from Main ware house plant to 60+ Plants is only stock transfers and not real consumption).
In which case how to go about for forecast and MRP run for 60+ Plants and Main plant ?
Thanks,
R.Velmurugan

No Planning happening with scope of Planning for total Planning

Hi SAP Gurus,
The Scenario is for Consumption based planning and MRP run.
I have created a New Entry under Scope of Planning for total Planning run and entered the required two plants under sequence of Plants.
I have also entered manually consumption values for trial materials in those two Plants. I maintained MRP and Forecast View.
I then ran MD01 using the Scope of Planning created. But when I check the MD04 results for trial materials, no Planning has happened.
I shows a message "Pl carry out Forecast for material xxx in Plant xxx "
Then using T.Code- OMDO, I created a variant for each Plant and also Scheduled. But after then also with MD01, No planning is happening.
When I check under T.Code - OMDU, the respective Plants were activated
Pl guide me the steps for Creating of Scope of Planning and then how to set up planning file and what could be the reason materials are not getting Planned.
thanks and regards,
R.Velmurugan.

Dear Mariano,
MRP type VV (forecast based Planning) is used for these materials.
I defined Scope of Planning for Total planning and included Plants in sequence.
Then I created new Variants for Planning file entries for these Plants (T.Code - OMDO).
Then I created new Variants for Planning file entry consistency for these Plants (T.Code - MDRE)
After then I executed Mass Forecast (T.Code - MP38) and then carried out total planning run using T.Code - MD01.
Now the materials are getting planned.
I missed Forecast run earlier.
I found the reason for the problem, hence closing the thread.
Thanks to Mariano and Daniele for your inputs.
Regards,
R.Velmurugan

Error Mrp: Total Planning Run stopped due to 25 Terminations of 202 Matls

Hi
We are trying to run the Mrp Job I.e steps (RMMRP00) with variant PLVH_NETCHNG)..
I have 1 db server and 2 apps servers and it the starts to run for about 2 minutes and then crashes with the ffg error:
Total Planning Run stopped due to 25 Terminations (dumps)of 202 Matls.
Apps Guys says its a basis issue and i cant see an issue.
ANy help will be appreciated

Hi,
Please check the MRP setting some times we define mrp value upto 3-4 decimal and our setting upto 2 decimal points. If you send error log then that will be helpful for us to see the exact problem in the dump.
In case you want to send this by mail send [email protected]
Regards,
Anil

In scope of planning ( md01), How to maintain MRP areas in scope of plg?

Hello PP members,
In scope of planning ( md01), How to maintain plant or MRP areas in scope of planning ?
What is the transaction code for maintaining plants or MRP areas in the scope of planning
I tried transaction code SAMP, Also went to SE93( Maintain transaction) for any related transaction codes for maintaining plants in scope of planning, it wasn't much help
Thanks for your time,
Thanks Again,
Suren R

Hi,
we can use Total planning(MD01) for a single plant or use scope of planning to control whether total planning is to be carried out for single plant/sevaral plant/ for one MRP Area/sevaral MRP areas/ combination of plant and MRP Areas.
Steps :
1.Group together the plants which are to be planned in spro in --->Define scope of planning.(OM0E)
2. Define the scope of planning as 999 for ex and give description.
2. Now select that and Specify the sequence in which Plants and MRP Areas are to be planned,
3.Goto new entries and enter the plant as 1000/MRP Area as 1000 with counter 1 and plant as 1100 with counter 2 and save.
4.Execute the total planning either as online job or as background job.
5.The planning run has to be always started with paralle processing.
In SPRO in define parallel processing in MRP enter the destination for parallel processing for ex your server name and enter the no .of sessions as 1 and save.
6.Tcode MD01 enter the scope of planning group and selet the parallel processing and enter.
7. All the materials to be planned in the plant / mrp area will be planned now.
Regards,
nandha

Error occurred during CTM planning run

Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Khadar

Hi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Launch ASCP plan run very long time

Hi,
I launched constrained ASCP plan and it took very long time. I launch ASCP plan in friday and it still not finished yet till monday, Memory Based Shapshot & Snapshot Delete Worker are still running, Loader Worker With Direct Load Option is still in pending phase. MSC: Share Plan Partitions has been set to Yes.
When I run query below :
select table_name,
       partition_name
from   all_tab_partitions
where table_name like 'MSC_NET_RES_INST%'
OR     table_name like 'MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS%'
order by substr(partition_name,instr(partition_name,'_',-1,1)+1);
The results are:
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_0
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_0
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_1
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL__21
MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_999999
MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
SYSTEM_ITEMS_999999
Please help me how to increase the performance when launching the plan. Is change MSC: Share Plan Partitions to No the only way to increase the performance in running plan?
Thanks & Regards,
Yolanda

Hi Yolanda,
a) So does it means that plan was working fine earlier but you are facing this issue recently.. ? If so then what you have changed at server side or have you applied any recent patches.. ?
b) If you have not completed plan for single time,
I will suggest that run data collection in complete refresh mode for one organization which is having relatively small data. Further, you can modify plan options in order to reduce planning calculation load like
- disable pegging
- remove any demand schedule / supply schedule / global forecast etc
- enable only single organization which having relatively small demand and supply picture
- disable forecast spread
Once one plan run will be completed, then expand your collection scope to other organizations and also enabling above mentioned setting.
There are lots of points need to consider for performance issue like server configuration, hardware configuration, num of demands etc. So you can raise SR in parallel while working on above points.
Thanks,
D

Testing MRP scope of planning and MRP lists

Hi,
I am configuring the scope of planning and want to know how can I test if the planning is happening in the sequence as specified in the scope of planning. I would have around 20 plants in the scope. I thought of going after the time stamp on the receipts created by the system. Is there any table like MDKP which can show me the sequence of planning ?
Also what is the use oif the tcode MD08.... delete MRP lists ? what is the use of deleting these lists besides keeping the system clean
Thanks

Hi
Reorganization of the MRP Lists - MD08
A report is available for reorganizing the MRP lists which you can find in the menu for MRP under the menu option, Environment. If you enter the selection criteria, plant, material, and MRP date, the system deletes all the MRP lists from the database that are no longer required.This report can also be started in a test session and you can instruct the system to print out a list of all the deleted MRP lists.
Further
Deleting MRP Lists - Manually in MD05
If the MRP list is no longer required, you can delete it manually. In order to do this, choose MRP list ® Delete document. The MRP list will be deleted.If you do not delete the MRP list manually, it is stored in the system until a new MRP list is created by a further planning run.
regrads
muthuraman.d

Planning run with NETPL

Hello Friends,
I am using NETPL planning run and planning horizon is 3 months. I have a material for which requirement exists in Oct 2011.
When I saw the planning file entry I saw only NETCH is ticked and not NETPL. Till this point is okay.
But when I execute the MD03 with NETPL, system is creating purchase requisition for this requirement.Actually system should not have created the PR. I can understand the system creating the PR with NETCH. Please explaing why this is happening.
Thanks,
PL

Dear ,
Fundamentally , if you are using NETPL in MD03/MD02/MD01 , then any requirement with thin 3 months of Planning horizon should be planned only and will not cosider the requiirement beyond PH.
Please check the following :
1.Check in OMDX-What is the Planning Horizon ?
2.Did you maintain MRP group in MMR -MM02-MRP1 view ?? If you are using MRP group and defined a Planning Horizon for this MRP group, then the priority will be for the Planning Horizon pertaining to MRP group rather than the Planning Horizon pertaining to Plant.Just check the planning file entries. I think these materials must be having planning file entry with NETCH so it will not consider the total planning horizon even kept in OMDX.
3.What is the Re-scheudling Hozon kept in OPPQ-Define Carry all over all plant parameters?? Did you select Create Purchase Req Indicator as 2 OR 1 ?? Please refer this thread : MRP run creating extra proposals
4.Compare the Factory Calander set up with holidays for that particualr Planning Hozon period in work days .Even it is not that important .
I suspect the NETCH in planning file entery where as you r planning with NETPL.
Check all those points and come back .
Regards
JH

Total Planning run (Scope of Planning)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for