Total speed for port-channel when config speed 1000 in nexus5548?

hi ,everyone.
now i connect cisco 6509 and nexus 5548up using two 1000M link,and i want to binding two link as port-channel,
because 5548up port is 10GE ,cisco 6509 port is 1GE,i config speed 1000 in the nexus5548 ethernet port ,and i find
that speed 1000 commade auto config in interface port-channel,so i want to know the total speed in this port-channel
is 1000M or 2000M when the port-channel speed config as 1000?i appreciate for your help!!
the topology like this:
              1000M
6509      port-channel speed 1000M    nexus5548UP
              1000M

hi again
The speed of the links and portchannel is 1000M but the bandwith of the portchannel is 2000M

Similar Messages

  • MDS configuration for port channel

    I've tried to set up the new FC port channel upload to a pair of MDS 9124s, but as I don't know enough about the MDS side I can't get the link to come up. Are there any references available anywhere that tell you blow by blow exactly how to configure the MDS side of the port channel? Or perhaps a sample working config?
    Thanks

    Simon,
    A few items:
    1) You are on 1.4.1i Balboa code
    2) FI's are in FC switch mode as MDS 9124's don't support F-port channel (NPV/NPIV)
    3) It's a lot easier the first time if you have matched speed sfp+ all around. Although, with the correct configs, unmatched speeds can be made to work.
    If the FIs are in switch mode and your MDS is running a minimum 3.3 here are some configs that may help:
    MDS side interfaces 4/11 and 4/12 are plugged into the UCS fc ports. First setup and ensure ISLs are working properly between UCS and MDS, then configure the port-channels
    interface fc4/11
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      no shutdown
    interface fc4/12
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      no shutdown
    The UCS GUI Equipment -> Fabric Interconnects -> FI-A -> Set FC Switching Mode. This will cause both FI's to reboot into FC switch mode. This is VERY DISRUPTIVE, both FI's will reboot.
    On the UCS CLI you should see this on the UCS fc ports connected to the MDS
    cae-sj-ca3-A(nxos)# show running-config interface fc 2/1-2
    !Command: show running-config interface fc2/1-2
    !Time: Wed Oct 20 16:49:39 2010
    version 4.2(1)N1(1.4)
    interface fc2/1
      switchport mode E
      no shutdown
    interface fc2/2
      switchport mode E
      no shutdown
    Until you have VSAN trunks enabled, make sure the ports on the UCS and MDS are in the same VSAN. VSAN 1 for example.
    Once you have working ISLs, then proceed to turn them into port-channels and enable VSAN trunking. Start with the MDS
    Create a channel group, it should look like this
    cae-sj-9506-1# show run interface port-channel 3
    !Command: show running-config interface port-channel 3
    !Time: Wed Oct 20 17:06:01 2010
    version 5.0(1a)
    interface port-channel 3
      channel mode active
      switchport mode E
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport trunk mode auto  <-- VSAN trunking
    Enable VSAN trunking on the MDS ISL interfaces, it'll look like this:
    cae-sj-9506-1# show run interface fc 4/11-12
    !Command: show running-config interface fc4/11-12
    !Time: Wed Oct 20 17:07:05 2010
    version 5.0(1a)
    interface fc4/11
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      no shutdown
    interface fc4/12
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      no shutdown
    Add the channel group information to the MDS ISL interfaces:
    Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
    cae-sj-9506-1(config)# interface fc 4/11-12
    cae-sj-9506-1(config-if)# channel-group 3 force
    fc4/11 fc4/12 added to port-channel 3 and disabled
    please do the same operation on the switch at the other end of the port-channel,
    then do "no shutdown" at both ends to bring it up
    cae-sj-9506-1(config-if)# show run interface fc 4/11-12
    !Command: show running-config interface fc4/11-12
    !Time: Wed Oct 20 17:07:39 2010
    version 5.0(1a)
    interface fc4/11
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      channel-group 3 force
      no shutdown
    interface fc4/12
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
      switchport mode E
      switchport trunk mode auto
      channel-group 3 force
      no shutdown
    Create the SAN port channel on the UCS side
    SAN -> SAN Cloud -> Fabric A -> FC Port Channels -> Create Port Channel
    After you create the SAN port channel in UCS, make sure and enable it. I also bounce the MDS port channel at this point.
    If all is correct, in a few agonizing minutes, the port-channel will be formed and passing data.
    cae-sj-ca3-A(nxos)# show interface san-port-channel 1
    san-port-channel 1 is trunking
        Hardware is Fibre Channel
        Port WWN is 24:01:00:0d:ec:d3:5d:c0
        Admin port mode is E, trunk mode is on
        snmp link state traps are enabled
        Port mode is TE
        Port vsan is 1
        Speed is 8 Gbps
        Trunk vsans (admin allowed and active) (1,10,26,50,66,100-101,103,123,222,24
    0)
        Trunk vsans (up)                       (1,10,50,100,103)
        Trunk vsans (isolated)                 (26,66,101,123,222,240)
        Trunk vsans (initializing)             ()
        5 minute input rate 2312 bits/sec, 289 bytes/sec, 2 frames/sec
        5 minute output rate 1440 bits/sec, 180 bytes/sec, 2 frames/sec
          2669 frames input, 194760 bytes
            0 discards, 0 errors
            0 CRC,  0 unknown class
            0 too long, 0 too short
          2677 frames output, 158316 bytes
            0 discards, 0 errors
          0 input OLS, 1 LRR, 0 NOS, 0 loop inits
    Again, make sure you have the ISLs up an running first before configuring the port-channels. It makes troubleshooting much easier.
    Let me know if you need any help.

  • Configuring 9222i for Port-Channels to 6500

    I need to configure an MDS 9222i to do EhterChannel for redundant links to a Cisco 6500. I have tried to configure channel-group on the GE interface and I get an error (see below)
    b0maumigrjax(config-if)# channel-group 1
    command failed: Member list of different interface types not supported [created]
    9222i Config
    interface port-channel 1
      channel mode active
      switchport rate-mode dedicated
    interface GigabitEthernet1/1
      ip address 1.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
      switchport description Core.Link.Connection.22
      no shutdown
    interface GigabitEthernet1/2
      ip address 1.1.1.1.11 255.255.255.0
      switchport description Core.Link.Connection.23
      no shutdown
    6500 Config
    Interface Port-Channel 1
    sw acc vlan 10
    interface GigabitEthernet1/2
    channel-group 1 mode active
    no shut
    interface GigabitEthernet1/1
    channel-group 1 mode active
    no shut

    David,
    I tried that as well. I still was not able to get the interface's to come up in sh ether summ on the switch.
    fcip profile 1
      ip address 10.136.120.10
      tcp max-bandwidth-mbps 50 min-available-bandwidth-mbps 20  round-trip-time-ms 5
    fcip profile 2
      ip address 10.136.120.11
      tcp max-bandwidth-mbps 50 min-available-bandwidth-mbps 20  round-trip-time-ms 5
    interface fcip1
      use-profile 1
      peer-info ipaddr 10.136.120.13
      channel-group 1 force
      no shutdown
    interface fcip2
      use-profile 2
      peer-info ipaddr 10.136.120.14
      channel-group 1 force
      no shutdown

  • For port-channel

    Can I join Layer 2 MEC port channel with 10G SR and LR together?
    We are thinking of  using VSS setup.
    VSS with Server Farm switches.
    VSS sw1 and sw2 are in different building.
    in order to save cost..
    Server farm 1 with VSS sw1 will use 10G SR.
    Server farm 1 with VSS sw2 will use 10G LR.
    But I need to bundle that 10G SR and LR together to form L2 MEC..
    Thanks,
    John

    hi John,
    yes you can
    one thing you need to check  is that the qos scheduling match on the interfaces , they can differ depending on what cards they are on .....ie below (in bold)
    even if they dont match --  there is a command to ignore this in etherchannel formation -- i can dig up if you need.
    #sh int te 1/5/2 capabilities
    TenGigabitEthernet1/5/2
      Model:                 WS-X6708-10GE
      Type:                  10Gbase-SR
      Speed:                 10000
      Duplex:                full
      Trunk encap. type:     802.1Q,ISL
      Trunk mode:            on,off,desirable,nonegotiate
      Channel:               yes
      Broadcast suppression: percentage(0-100)
      Flowcontrol:           rx-(off,on),tx-(off,on)
      Membership:            static
      Fast Start:            yes
      QOS scheduling:        rx-(8q4t), tx-(1p7q4t)
      QOS queueing mode:     rx-(cos,dscp), tx-(cos,dscp)
      CoS rewrite:           yes
      ToS rewrite:           yes
      Inline power:          no
      Inline power policing: no
      SPAN:                  source/destination
      UDLD                   yes
      Link Debounce:         yes
      Link Debounce Time:    yes
      Ports-in-ASIC (Sub-port ASIC) : 2-3,6,8 (2)
      Remote switch uplink:  no
      Dot1x:                 no
      Port-Security:         yes

  • Port Channel Downtime/Convergence time when adding interfaces

    I am looking to add a 3rd and maybe a 4th physical port to an existing port channel as we are running out of capacity, at peak we are pushing around 1.3Gb over the 2Gb channel and we are expanding services out of this location. My question is this, what will the downtime and convergence time be on the port channel when i add in the extra interfaces. Will i drop packets, will my customers notice any service disruption ?
    Currently configured as follows:
    interface Port-channel2
     description DN Agg Switch 2
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan add <very large vlan list>
     switchport mode trunk
     mtu 9216
     mls qos trust dscp
     spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
    interface GigabitEthernet1/47
     description Po2 AGG#1
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan add <very large vlan list>
     switchport mode trunk
     mtu 9216
     mls qos trust dscp
     no cdp enable
     channel-group 2 mode on
    interface GigabitEthernet2/47
     description Po2 AGG#2
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport trunk allowed vlan add <very large vlan list>
     switchport mode trunk
     mtu 9216
     mls qos trust dscp
     no cdp enable
     channel-group 2 mode on
    Thank you

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    I wouldn't expect any service impact when adding links to the bundle.

  • About MDS 9222i config port-channel

    dear everyone~
      in project ,i need config  MDS 9222i use 4 FCIP interface connect to 7606S 4 GE port for port-channel feature,but in MDS9222i i use port-channel commad ,cannot run。
    how can i config it？
    thinks~

    Hi Sun,
    Ethernet PortChannels are not supported on MSM-18/4 modules and 9222i IPS modules.
    You can place the fcip interfaces in a fibre channel port-channel instead.
    Regards,
    David

  • Port Channel 5548 with 6509

    My company just purchased a Nexus 5548.  I've been fooling around with the configurations and just getting familiar with this equipment.  I've already configured a port channel using 2 10gig ports on our 3850 and its working fine.
    Now, I'm trying to configure a second port channel with our 6509 1gig ports. Ports comes up. But I cannot communicate between these 2 devices.
    Show CDP Neigh shows the other devices. Show Etherchannel summary is blank
    This is the config on the 6509
    interface Port-channel22
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet9/7
      switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-group 22 mode on (I also tried using Active and desirable)
    Config on 5548
    Inteface Port-Channel 2
    switchport
     switchport mode trunk
     speed 1000
    interface ethernet1/32
     switchport mode trunk
     speed 1000
     channel-group 22 mode on
    I also have feature Lacp , interface vlan and vlan dot1q tag native enabled
    Any ideas why I cannot communicate between these devices? 

    This is what is showing on the 5548
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface Ethernet1/32, operat
    ional speed changed to 1 Gbps
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface Ethernet1/32, op
    erational duplex mode changed to Full
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Etherne
    t1/32, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Etherne
    t1/32, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface port-channel2, opera
    tional speed changed to 1 Gbps
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface port-channel2, o
    perational duplex mode changed to Full
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-ch
    annel2, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface port-ch
    annel2, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to off
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_UP: port-channel2: Ethe
    rnet1/32 is up
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel2:
    first operational port changed from none to Ethernet1/32
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface Ethernet1/32 is up i
    n mode trunk
    2015 Mar 18 08:18:09 DC-5548-01 %ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface port-channel2 is up
    in mode trunk
    My 6509 does not show anything. Now when I do  a show etherchannel summary on the 6509, the protocol is lacp.

  • MPLS TE over Port-channel interfaces

    I get the following 'warning' when configuring MPLS TE on a port-channel interface. Any comments on what the limitations to using TE on a port-channel interface are?
    7606(config)#interface port-channel99
    7606(config-if)#mpls traffic-eng tunnels
    %Warning: MPLS TE support is limited for port-channel interfaces.
    For additional information, please contact the MPLS TE product manager.

    Hi,
    I configured TE and FRR on Port-Channel also. I saw some TE Tunnels worked with FRR, some didn't. I enclose here for reference.
    Router#sho mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute database
    Headend frr information:
    Protected tunnel In-label Out intf/label FRR intf/label Status
    Tunnel1000 Tun hd Po1:implicit-nul Tu1004:implicit- ready
    Tunnel1001 Tun hd Po2:implicit-nul Tu1005:implicit- ready
    LSP midpoint frr information:
    LSP identifier In-label Out intf/label FRR intf/label Status
    Router#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels brief
    Signalling Summary:
    LSP Tunnels Process: running
    Passive LSP Listener: running
    RSVP Process: running
    Forwarding: enabled
    Periodic reoptimization: every 10 seconds, next in 8 seconds
    Periodic FRR Promotion: every 300 seconds, next in 146 seconds
    Periodic auto-bw collection: every 300 seconds, next in 133 seconds
    TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION UP IF DOWN IF STATE/PROT
    CISCO ISC-P139 172.16.254.253 - Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P141 172.16.254.252 - Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P145 172.16.254.251 - Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P147 172.16.254.250 - Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B181 172.16.254.253 - Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B182 172.16.254.252 - Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P166 172.16.254.254 Po2 - up/up
    CISCO ISC-B187 172.16.254.252 Po1 Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B188 172.16.254.251 Po2 Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P159 172.16.254.254 Po1 - up/up
    CISCO ISC-B185 172.16.254.250 Po1 Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B186 172.16.254.253 Po2 Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P173 172.16.254.254 Po2 - up/up
    CISCO ISC-P174 172.16.254.253 Po2 Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B189 172.16.254.254 Po1 - up/up
    CISCO ISC-B190 172.16.254.250 Po2 Po1 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P153 172.16.254.252 Po1 Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-P155 172.16.254.254 Po1 - up/up
    CISCO ISC-B183 172.16.254.251 Po1 Po2 up/up
    CISCO ISC-B184 172.16.254.254 Po2 - up/up
    Displayed 6 (of 6) heads, 8 (of 8) midpoints, 6 (of 6) tails
    Can you explain more detail about the limited support for TE on Port-channel?
    Many thanks

  • Nexus 6K: Port-Channel Load-Balance

    Hi all,
    I configured "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-mac" on Nexus 6001. But when I use "show run all | in load-balance", it displays module 1 and module 2 are still using source-dest-ip for port-channel load-balance. And for command "show port-channel load-balance" and "show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface", it still shows switch using MAC for hash algorithm. The NXOS is 6.0(2)N1(2a).
    Does anybody know:
    -  What is the function of "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module" and in which situation this command will be effective?
    -  It shows "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module" command for both module 1 and 2. Module 1 is N6K Supervisor and module 2 is 4xQSFP Ethernet Module. Is it possible to set different load-balance algorithm  to these 2 modules?   
    # show run all | in load-balance
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-mac
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module 1
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module 2
    # show port-channel load-balance
    Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
    System: source-dest-mac
    Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
    Non-IP: source-dest-mac
    IP: source-dest-mac
    # show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface port-channel 30 vlan 150 src-ip 172.25.228.6 dst-ip 172.25.226.97
    Missing params will be substituted by 0's.
    Load-balance Algorithm on switch: source-dest-mac
    crc_hash: 977 Polynomial: CRC10b        Outgoing port id  Ethernet1/2
    Param(s) used to calculate load-balance:
            seed: 0x701
            dst-mac:  0000.0000.0000
            src-mac:  0000.0000.0000
    # show module
    Mod Ports Module-Type                         Model                  Status
    1   48    Norcal 64 Supervisor                N6K-C6001-64P-SUP      active *
    2   10    Nexus 4xQSFP Ethernet Module        N6K-C6001-M4Q          ok
    Mod  Sw              Hw      World-Wide-Name(s) (WWN)
    1    6.0(2)N2(3)     1.0     --
    2    6.0(2)N2(3)     1.0     --

    Hi all,
    I configured "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-mac" on Nexus 6001. But when I use "show run all | in load-balance", it displays module 1 and module 2 are still using source-dest-ip for port-channel load-balance. And for command "show port-channel load-balance" and "show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface", it still shows switch using MAC for hash algorithm. The NXOS is 6.0(2)N1(2a).
    Does anybody know:
    -  What is the function of "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module" and in which situation this command will be effective?
    -  It shows "port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module" command for both module 1 and 2. Module 1 is N6K Supervisor and module 2 is 4xQSFP Ethernet Module. Is it possible to set different load-balance algorithm  to these 2 modules?   
    # show run all | in load-balance
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-mac
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module 1
    port-channel load-balance ethernet source-dest-ip module 2
    # show port-channel load-balance
    Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
    System: source-dest-mac
    Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
    Non-IP: source-dest-mac
    IP: source-dest-mac
    # show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface port-channel 30 vlan 150 src-ip 172.25.228.6 dst-ip 172.25.226.97
    Missing params will be substituted by 0's.
    Load-balance Algorithm on switch: source-dest-mac
    crc_hash: 977 Polynomial: CRC10b        Outgoing port id  Ethernet1/2
    Param(s) used to calculate load-balance:
            seed: 0x701
            dst-mac:  0000.0000.0000
            src-mac:  0000.0000.0000
    # show module
    Mod Ports Module-Type                         Model                  Status
    1   48    Norcal 64 Supervisor                N6K-C6001-64P-SUP      active *
    2   10    Nexus 4xQSFP Ethernet Module        N6K-C6001-M4Q          ok
    Mod  Sw              Hw      World-Wide-Name(s) (WWN)
    1    6.0(2)N2(3)     1.0     --
    2    6.0(2)N2(3)     1.0     --

  • Port-channel Problem between Fabric Interconnect and N7K vPC

    Dear all,
    I have a problem with Port-channel Uplink between Fabric Interconnect with N7K using vPC
    This is my network topology for UCS Deployment
    In N7K I has configured vPC for red link and green link, at Fabric Interconnect A I has configured Port-Channel with member is Port 1 and Port 2, uplink is red link. At Fabric Interconnect B, I has configured Port-Channel with member is Port 1 and Port 2, uplink is green link.
    The show interface port-channel on N7K is good, every port-channel is up and have all member. But At Fabric Interconnnect, when I see on UCS Manager, the status of Port-Channel on Fabic A and Fabric B is fault with Additional Info: No operational member. Although all link is link up and I has status of Port-Channel is enable on UCS Manager. When I see the Properties of Port 1, Port 2 on Port-channel, I see the membership status is : individual. This mean port-channel is not up and no membership in this configuration. I want to using port-channel for load balance and plus more bandwidth for uplink to 20Gig. I don't understand why ?
    Please help me resolve this problem, I has send the capture screen of UCS Manager when I show status of Port-channel and Port-member in port-channel in attach items.
    Anyone can help me to resolve this, thanks you very much. Please reference attach items for more detail about fault.
    Thanks,
    Trung.

    Thanks Matthew very much,
    I has resolved this problem. The reason of problem is miss match protocol of port-channel between N7K and Fabric Interconnect. The Fabric Interconnect always use LACP protocol, but N7K using Port-channel mode on, that why the port-channel failed. I has configured LACP for port-channel in N7K, it has resolved the problems.
    Thanks,
    Trung.

  • "The `Inline' mode also supports `Port-Channel'" ?

    Referring to this document:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns377/deployment_guide_c07-490578.html
    it states:
    "The `Inline' mode also supports `Port-Channel', which enables load-balancing and `high-availability' should one of the physical link fails"
    is this true? I have a WAVE-474 which comes with 1 onboard port and 2 inline ports. Can you configure those 2 inline ports in a port channel and then use it with WCCP? I don't believe you can. Not sure what the document is referring too.
    I also have WAVE-574's and that one can do port-channel using two onboard GIG interfaces + WCCP.

    Hi Roman,
    Your judgement was right. You can not configure inline interface in a port channel configuraiton.
    Here is the output from wae-612 running 4.1.5c . You will see that there is no option for port channel / channel-group with inline interface.
    WAE612-3(config)#int inlineGroup ?
      <1-4>/  Slot number
    WAE612-3(config)#int inlineGroup 1/0
    WAE612-3(config-if)#?
      autosense      Interface autosense
      bandwidth      Interface bandwidth
      encapsulation  Set encapsulation type for an interface
      exit           Exit from this submode
      failover       Modify failover parameters
      full-duplex    Interface fullduplex
      half-duplex    Interface halfduplex
      inline         VLAN's to intercept
      ip             Interface Internet Protocol Config commands
      no             Negate a command or set its defaults
      shutdown       Put the inline interface in passthrough mode
    WAE612-3(config-if)#exit
    WAE612-3(config)#int g 1/0
    WAE612-3(config-if)#?
      autosense      Interface autosense
      bandwidth      Interface bandwidth
      cdp            Cisco Discovery Protocol Interface Config commands
      channel-group  Configure EtherChannel group
      description    Interface specific description
      exit           Exit from this submode
      full-duplex    Interface fullduplex
      half-duplex    Interface halfduplex
      ip             Interface Internet Protocol Config commands
      mtu            Set the interface Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)
      no             Negate a command or set its defaults
      shutdown       Shutdown the specific interface
      standby        Standby interface config commands
    WAE612-3(config-if)#
    Hope this helps.
    Regards.

  • FEX-2232 FCoE Port channel limitation

    Hi all,
    i havea single FEX 2232 single homed to nexus 5020 via port-channel. at the FEX 2232, i connected a server which have 2 X CNA and running two vlans: vlan 200 for ethernet and vlan 300 for FCoE.
    i connected the server to the single fex via port-channel and allowed vlan 200 & 300. at the N5K i bounded single vfc interface to this port-channel.
    when i am issuing the show flogi database i see only single PWWN.
    as i understand, a single vfc interface can only see single PWWN, is this correct ?
    if it does, how can i have my setup running in a way that ethernet traffic  will used port-channel and for fcoe traffic i will see two PWWN ?
    please advise,
    Avi.

    It is not necessary to create another FCoE Vlan if the logins are coming on the same n5k. If there is a requirement for multiple fcoe logins on the same n5k, then it will need to be single link port channels instead of multiple links in the port channel. That way we acquire the ability to bind each physical port via port-channel into a separate vfc. In your case ideally you can have two n5ks with two n2232s single homed to each n5k and the server dual homed with 1 port each connected to two separate 2232s in active-active teaming. That way you can bind the physical interfaces into single virtual port channel on the respective n5ks. at that point, you can separate the san traffic into different vsan/vlan and make sure you dont trunk the fcoe vlan over the vpc peer link.
    Hope this helps, Vinayak.

  • RWB - No adapter registered for this channel (JDBC)

    Hi Experts,
    All my JDBC communication channels have the following log in RWB:
    No adapter registered for this channel
    When executing an interface, SXMB_MONI shows:
    Object not found in lookup of SapXIJDBCAdapterService
    We have aready performed a CPACache refresh as mentioned on another threads but the problem persists.
    I performed dummy changes in the CC and even created a new one but the log still remains the same.
    Please advise what else can be done to solve the issue. We are using PI 7.1.
    Regards,
    Daniela

    Hello,
    Try checking in the Netweaver Administrator if the JDBC service is running?                                               
    There is also a dependency of modules in between the SapXIJDBCAdapterService and SapXIFileAdapterService. Please check that the File Adapter service is started also.      
    Regards,
    Sarah

  • About n1000v with port channel

    there is a n1000v connected to multiple upstream switches in the customer's production environment.
    the following is from the Cisco Nexus 1000V Interface Configuration Guide, Release4.2(1)SV2(2.1).
    You use vPC-HM mode to create a port channel when the switch is connected to multiple upstream switches
    that are not clustered.
    my question is,
    can I use LACP with multiple upstream switches that are not clustered?
    can I use LACP with multiple upstream switches that are stacked?
    if I stack multiple upstream switches,does it mean clustered?
    thanks.

    Hi,
    See some of the guidelines:
    Guidelines and Limitations
    Port channeling has the following guidelines and restrictions:
    •All ports in the port channel must be in the same Cisco Nexus 1000V module; you cannot configure port channels across Cisco Nexus 1000V modules.
    •Port channels can be formed with multiple upstream links only when they satisfy the compatibility requirements and under the following conditions:
    –The uplinks from the host are going to the same upstream switch.
    –The uplinks from the host going to multiple upstream switches are configured with vPC-HM.
    •You can configure multiple port channels on a device.
    •After you configure a port channel, the configuration that you apply to the port channel interface affects the port channel member ports. The configuration that you apply to the member ports affects only the member port where you apply the configuration.
    •You must remove the port security information from a port before you can add that port to a port channel. Similarly, you cannot apply the port security configuration to a port that is a member of a channel group.
    •You can configure ports that belong to a port channel group as PVLAN ports.
    •Any configuration changes that you apply to the port channel is applied to every member interface of that port channel.
    •Channel member ports cannot be a source or destination SPAN port.
    That said LACP should work on switches that are not clustered and meet the conditions above.
    A stack is treated as one unit which means that would be like you have just one big chassis.
    Stacking does not the same as clustering it works different. so if you stack them that would be a stack not a cluster
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_2_1_s_v_1_4/interface/configuration/guide/n1000v_if_5portchannel.html#wp1270746
    Hope this helps.

  • WAAS Port Channel Configuration

    In the recent weeks we got some reports that CIFS writing performance to NETAPP OnTap 7.3 filer was degraded for WAAS accelerated connections.  NETAPP OnTAP 7.2  and native Microsoft filers were running fine. In our Testlab we could correlate this issue with the port channel setup on  our WAAS devices. With round robin (standard setting) the CIFS writing perforamce was poor. By switching  the port channel loadbalancing to src-dst-ip-port the performance was excellent.
    Is there any known best practices recommendation for port channel configuration on WAAS  devices?
    Many thanks in advance, Peter.

    The best practice depends on your network. Most deployments are fine with the default round robin configuration for port channel on the WAE. But I have encountered some installations where the configuration had to be changed in order to avoid out of order packets causing slow performance (like, if there is a firewall between the WAE and the server).
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with Sourcing for multiple line items SRM 7.0

    Dear All, We are in SRM 7.0, extended classic scenerio, For sourcing we have selected config "Sourcing is carried out for items without a Assigned source of supply" for all sytems and all product categories Our requirement is Catalog items should not

  • MacBook Pro 8,1 no OS to boot?

         OK, so here is the problem. When I boot up my Mac, it loads up rEFIt, but only has the 'Legacy OS' option, which points to no operating system. Before, I had the option for Windows 8, and OSX Mavericks. In essence, my Mac has absolutely no OS to

  • In mail attachments are not deleted even though mail is deleted

    In mail attachments are not deleted even though mail is deleted

  • How do I get rid of the update request on screen when I am running version 21

    How do I get rid of the request to update my version of Firefox below my search request on the front page when I have already updated to Firefox version 21. My search engine is http://www.google.co.uk/firefox Thanks for any help.

  • What might it do in the future?

    I am new to Apple Touch and Ipod in general. Like many I love gadgets, the Touch included. I notice my Touch only has one wire connection that seems to allow both updating or synching and charging of the unit. I am wondering what other potential task