Total up of Actual cost to Upper level

Hi All ,
I have WBS structure with 4 to 5 level . Now I want sum of Actual cost from forth level to first level of GR value + Goods Issue value (from table QBWE -SALK3 & MSEG-
BWART(281 ) & value from DMBRT ) to Level 1 WBS like standard report . I check in many table but no tables give such total value .
Thanks ,
Virendra

Hi,
Well I think, you can't get that level wise WBS actual data in a table or report. You have to filter.
As Amit suggest, CJI3 have the required info as you want. And as I understood, you want to sum-up cost only to some WBS levels. Right..You can manually select your WBS range using multiple selection criteria in CJI3 selection screen from 1 to 4 level and then sum-up there.
Regards
Shishir

Similar Messages

Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

Hi All
For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
Thank you

Hi
Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
Regards
Ajay M

How can I crosscheck Total Planned/Actual Cost in MCI3 (S061) correct?

Hi Masters,
I want to crosscheck "Total Planned Cost" and "total Actual Cost" in MCI3(S061) - Location and Planning analysis is correct or not.'
In my current system I am trying to compare the Orders in IW39 and MCI3 but costs are not matching.
I have done some analysis and found that the costs are updated in S061 from PMCO.
But for same Orders in months e.g August I am getting posting for July,August and Semptember.
So I am not sure how I can compare the values of "Total Planned Cost " and Total Actual Cost" in S061 to IW39.
If it is possible to compare what selection criteria I should use for fetcing the Orders from AUFK or IW39. Which dates are I should used ( Date range - Period, Basic start/end dates, Actual start/End Dates).
With Best Regards,
Narendra dere
SAP- Manufacturing.

Hello,
Comparing the MCI3 & IW39 cost figures is not right as per my knowledge.
S061-->following below logic for calculations for Actual Cost and Planned Cost
Total planned costs for PM measures
Sum of planning costs for PM measures
This key figure will be updated when a PM order with a time reference is created and changed at the starting date of the posting period, in which the costs were created.
Total of the actual costs for PM measures
This key figure is updated with every cost-relevant transaction for a PM order (for example, completion confirmation, material withdrawal) for the beginning date of the posting period, in which the costs were created. For historical orders, the key figure is updated when creating and changing a historical order with a time reference to the starting date of the posting period which was determined for the reference date of the order.
Total of actual costs for companyu2019s own material for PM measures
This key figure is updated for every cost-relevant operation for a maintenance order (for example, time confirmation, material withdrawal).
For historical orders, the key figure is updated when creating and changing a historical order with a time reference to the starting date of the posting period which was determined for the reference date of the order. The key figure update is important from a business point of view only when a material removal is made.
Total of actual costs for external material for PM measures
This key figure is updated with every cost-relevant transaction for a PM order (for example, completion confirmation, material withdrawal) for the beginning date of the posting period, in which the costs were created.
Regards,
Rakesh

Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"

Dear Gurus,
Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Dhanurdhari.

Hi Amit,
-- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
-- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
Pls revert back for further explanation
Srikanth Munnaluri

Actual cost showing different

Hi Expert,
The actual cost showing different in two report cji3 & cn41.Plz help me.
Thanks

I did whatever you have suggested me.but i have not found desired result.
scenario is- In cn41 report
suppose the actual cost in wbs is 6649095
But under this network & activity level the actual cost is 6461522
In cji3 report at network activity level the actual cost is 6461522 & the actual cost of wbs is also 6461522
Plz guide me why cn41 report showing different actual cost at wbs level.
regards

Actual cost by task by means of evaluations

Hi experts,
We are working on cprojects 4.5. We have cprojects with phases and tasks tranferred to PS ( one wbs for each object). Costs are charged in WBS linked to tasks. Is it possible see in cproject actual cost at task level? We thought by means of evaluations are possible but only appears at project level.
Any idea is welcome!
Regards,
Sara

Hi Sara,
Not in standard.
But it can be realized via Badi in cProject side and a customer function modul in ERP system.
Logic briefly:
1. Creation a customer own function modul in ERP system, it should be remote-enabled and should deliver the costs of specifed object.
2. Implement the Badi of cProject evaluation, within the impementation call the customer function modul and fill the value of actual costs.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Sales order costing - tracking of actual costs at sales order item level

Hi
We are going with sales order costing for services
Service material is non-valuated hence the scenario is non-valuated sales order stock
PP module is not implemented.
I am having following questions
1. How to track the actual costs at sales order item level? Is Internal order/CO production order is required to be created for the same?
2. Can I do activity confirmations directly from cost center to sales order item.
3. Can Raw material is issued directly against sales order item.
4. Is Sales order is a real or statistical account assignment object?

dear friend,
please look here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/90/ba6cfb446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
reagrds,

Total actual cost

Hello experts.
When we exacute transfer posting with movement type 631.
Especially we transfer special stock to consignment stock.
Price difference was occured.
So I've checked production order for the special stock.
Then I can find that the production order item's standard price is different from master data.
More detail I can find total actual cost has difference between them.
So I'd lke to know the calculation logic of total actual price.
Regards.

Hi,
Please check the thread . will be some what useful.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/d0/fc3cd891cf11d38ab70000e83234f3/content.htm,
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4c/013f188c7a11d38ab40000e83234f3/content.htm,
Regards,

Field name of Total Actual Cost

Hi,
Can anyone tell me the Field name of Total Actual Cost in a PM Order.
I tried and found a BAPI which will give all the costs involved in the order but i want to know the exact Field Name and Table from which it comes.
Thanks,
Amit.

Hi Sunil,
Can you tell me the Table Name also? I'm getting Structure but to extract data i need the table name also.
Thanks,
Amit.

Total actual cost for a given PM Order

hello all,
how do i get total actual cost for a given PM order (in IW33 under cost tab we have total actual cost)..
is stored in table or do i need to use any function module.....
thanks in advance....

Hi Vinay,
You can use the following logic for extracting the Actual cost of a PM order.
Pass the Order No (AUFNR) in Table AUFK and fetch the Object number (OBJNR).
Pass OBJNR value in table COEP.
You can get the actual cost of the order in COEP table.
Please mark this as correct if it resolves your issue.
Regards,
Joydeep

Function Module to Find Actual costs and Total Cost Commitments

Hi PS Experts ,
Please let me know if there is any function module to find Acutal costs and Total cost commitments by passing WBS element as Input .
Regards,
Karan

Hi Karan,
I think for actual cost - there is definately one FM availbale. Try to find it out.
Just ensure - if you are using Network Activity then you may have to pass NWA OBJNR into this FM to get actual cost. As some entry posting happens against NWA like Timesheet. Hope it will give you some idea to get rid on your issue.

Planned and Actual costs at the Activity level

Hi all,
Can you tell me if there is a R/3 report which lists out the planned and actual costs for a project and displays it for each network and activity? I want these values at the activity level.
I found a report which lists out these values for each network, but I cannot drilldown to the activity level. Please help.
Thanks,
Satyajit.

Hi,
There is setting in network type. Please go through transaction OPUV i.e.
Change view- Network type paramaeters : overview " Overview.
Uner Network type parameters there is one radio button in front of ActvtyAcctAssgn. Just activate it.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tushar

Distributing Actual Costs to the Product Level

We are using Material Ledger at my client and we have some things such as Freight, Depreciation etc. being added to the standard cost as an additive cost. For the actual values for these is it possible to include this in the ML actual cost without having to go through MR22?
Thank you

Hello,
I think you need to rethink the scenario. Freight should have been added to the material cost at the time of procurement and depreciation should flow from cost centers. Another alternate can be that you post actual freight and depreciation both in cost centers , define activity for them , plan them as well and use formula based planning templates to allocate so that they are build up in the cost estimate as well and in actuals they are actualised through the cost center route.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Actual cost component values

Hi
We are facing an issue that actual cost component values in our system are not calculating correctly. We consider that there might be difference in our understanding regarding the calculation of actual cost component values.
Therefore I want to understand that how actual cost component values are calculated in SAP Material Ledger. I will appreciate if anyone can elaborate this with example and formula, used for calculation.
Regards

Hi Saad,
Please find below about the actual cost calculation in ML.
In ML single -level and multi-level material settlements are available. Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
The actual price for each material can be updated to the material master for the closed period.
-During price determination, the system carries out the following calculation:
=>Daily Transaction
1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
   Dr) Stock XYZ 200                   CR) GRIR 220
Purchase price differ XYZ 20
2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
   DR) Stock ZYX 400                   CR) GRIR 440
Purchase price differ ZYX 40
3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
   DR) Material cost XYZ 150               CR) Stock XYZ 150
4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
   DR) Material cost ZYX 300               CR) Stock ZYX 300
5) Good receipt 234 Qty 15 Std : 40
DR) Stock 234 600                    CR) Clearing 600
6) Good delivery 234 Qty 10 Std : 40
   DR) Material cost 234 400         CR) Stock 234 400
7) Good receipt 123 Qty 10 Std : 50
    DR) Stock123 500                    CR) Clearing 500
8) Good issue 123 Qty 5 Std : 50
   DR) Material cost 123 250         CR) Stock 123 250
9) Good receipt ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
    DR) StockABC 600                    CR) Clearing 600
10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
    DR) COGS 300                          CR) Stock ABC 300
=> Monthly Material Ledger Closing
1) Single-level price determination
   DR) Stock XYZ 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
   CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
*Transfer price difference to 234 15 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
    DR) Stock ZYX 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
    CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
*Transfer price difference to 234 30 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
2) Multi-level price determination
    DR) Stock234 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from XYZ 15
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 10 ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
       * price difference 15)
    DR) Stock 234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from ZYX 30
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
        ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock 123 15 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 30
* Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
            ( Good issue qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
*Not allocated price difference 7.5
            ( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
3) consumption revaluation
         DR) COGS ABC 7.5
         CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
=> Current Actual Stock Amount
   1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
   2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
   3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
   4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 265 (actual price : 53)
   5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
I hope you understand the process of actual cost cal in ML.
Regards,
chandu.

Actual costing: "not allocated" differences in second currency

Dear colleagues, we need your advise on the following issue.
We have Material Ledger (ML) and Currency & Valuation profile activated with two intra-currencies:
10 Company code currency
32 Group currency, profit center valuation
Both ML currencies are equal in exchange rates (1=1).
Actual costing run in ML is not working correctly for manufactured products, if raw materials were purchased for any extra-currency, e.g. USD or EUR. For example, three-level BOM:
1) for Raw materials (purchased for USD) consumption differences are equal in both ML currencies;
2) for Semi-finished product consumption differences are equal, but in second ML currency they are not included in upper-level consumption, and present as "not allocated";
3) as a result, costs are different in intra-currencies on the Finished product level.
Note 908776 - "Not included/not allocated and not distributed" - doesn't give explanation of this case.
Please, help!

HI,
Single Level Price Determination and Multiple Level Price Determination are steps that you will need to carry out as part of Month end close for Material Ledger. This is also appropriate for calculation of the product cost.
If you don't include multiple level price determination, the product cost for your part being manufactured in company code B in your example will be incorrect. However, if your concern is related to inclusion of multiple level price difference in revaluation of inventory, then you may need to introduce some custom code for reclassification purpose. You can refer to tables CKMLCR and MLCD for multiple level price differences and quantities.
Regards

Total up of Actual cost to Upper level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for