Trace of PR when transferred to SRM by BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER

Hi!
The report BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER are run every other minute. Sometimes we are unable to find the PRs in SRM and we can not find them in EPRTRANS table either.
Is there a way to regenerate the PRs up into EPRTRANS?
Is there a way to see what happened to the PRs?
We do not see any errors.
Sincerely
Anders

Hi!
SLG1 in back end and SRM are clean. We can not see a trace of any errors regarding this replication
Sincerely
Anders

Similar Messages

  • Plant is changed when PR transfered to SRM

    Hello SRM guys,
    Our project implement Plan driven scenario. But we find one problem, when PR is transfered to SRM to create SC, Plant and storage location are changed.   Example:  The original PR plant is 2001, but after transfered to SRM as SC, the plant in SC is changed to 1001.
    Any one solve this problem? 
    Thaks.

    Hello Justin,
    When we faced this issue, it was due to XI user attribute. The plant was getting updated in SC from XI user default. SAP provided the OSS note for this.
    Which SRM version you are using?
    Also, check if you have any DOC CHANGE implementation, which is causing this.
    Hope this helps.
    Ashutosh

  • Contracts tolerances are not transfering to SRM SC PO

    Hi SRM Expects ,
    contract tolerances not transfering to SRM SC PO .
    We have created a SC based on the contract with  Product category and Supplier , when SC is orderd and PO is created , i can see Contract number in item tab , but  tolerances are not coming from contract in to the  SRM PO.
    contract allocated already before SC was sent for approval. The PO claims, when looking on item detail, it is connected to contract .. But no tolerance
    limits have been transferred from contract to the PO.
    Reagrds,
    Krishna.

    Dear Poster,
    As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
    Best Regards,
    SDN SRM Moderation Team

  • I have inherited an ICloud account from one of my employers when transferring from old MacBook Pro to new MacMini and need to separate from this, presumably by setting up a new ICloud account.  How do I do this ?

    I have inherited an ICloud account from one of my employers when transferring from old MacBook Pro (which belonged to them) to new MacMini and need to separate from this, presumably by setting up a new ICloud account.  How do I do this ?  And is there any danger, in doing so, that I might delete any of her ICloud information ?

    Sign out in System Preferences>iCloud. This will remove any synced data such as Calendars, emails and Contacts from your Mac, but will have no effect on the data on the server - so that other devices logged into it will continue to see the data.

  • Cd drive on my laptop not seen as a device. Can refresh itunes and device appears but get unknown sync error 13019 when transferring cd's to my nano.  The cd's appear on the nano when it's connected to itunes but aren't there when I disconnect?

    cd drive on my laptop not seen as a device. Can refresh itunes and device appears but get unknown sync error 13019 when transferring cd's to my nano.  The cd's appear on the nano when it's connected to itunes but aren't there when I disconnect?

    Satellite L675-S7113 Specifications (PSK3AU-07C02S)
    Satellite L675-S7113 Support Page
    rwls wrote:...since I got it 3 years ago I've been unable to burn an audio CD from ITunes or Windows media although it worked once after the computer had been shut off for awhile..and didn't find the problem until after my warranty had expired...
    From your statements above, it sounds like you never tried to burn a CD for at least the first year that you owned the laptop, as it had a one year warranty on it. While you might have used it frequently to install software,  play DVDs, Blu-Ray disks, etc, that's unclear from your statements. Nonetheless, it might just be dirty-dusty. So, before deleting-uninstalling any software, and given they're cheap, try a CD-DVD Cleaner Disk first and see if that resolves your problems.
    Let us know what happens. Good luck.
    Mike

  • What software is needed to be able to open the olm file I have exported from Outlook to my documents when transfering my Microsoft Office Contacts to my Mac Addressbook?

    what software is needed to be able to open the olm file I have exported from Outlook to my documents when transfering my Microsoft Office Contacts to my Mac Addressbook?

    You might find a solution here: how to convert microsoft outlook contacts to apple address book - Google Search
    OT

  • Is there a way to turn off using ram as intermediary when transfering files between 2 internal hdds? (write cache is off on all drives)

    right forum?  first time here. none of the options seem perfect. so i guess this applies to 'setup.' i tried to describe what's happening verbosely from the start of a file transfer to completion of writing file to 2nd hard drive.
    win 7 64bit home - i2600k 3.4ghz - 8gb of ram - 2hdd 1 ssd
    I have this problem when transferring files between 2 internal hard drives. one is unhealthy (slow write speeds but not looking for advice to replace it because it serves its unimportant purpose). so, the unhealthy drive drops into PIO mode - that's acceptable.
    however, a little over 1gb of any file transfer is cached in RAM during the file transfer. after the file transfer window closes, indicating the transfer is "complete" (HA!), it still has 1gb to write from RAM which takes about 30minutes. This would
    not be a problem if it did not also earmark an additional 5gb of ram (never in use), leaving 1gb or less 'free' for programs. this needlessly causes my pc to be sluggish - moreso than a typical file transfer file between 2 healthy drives. i have windows write
    caching turned off on all drives. so this is a different setting i can't figure out nor find after 2 hours of google searches.
    info from taskmanager and resource monitor.
    idle estimates: total 8175, cached 532, available 7218, free 6771 and the graph in taskman shows about 1gb memory in use.
    at the start of a file transfer:  8175,  2661,  6070,  4511free and ~2gb of ram used in graph. No problems, yet.
    however, as the transfer goes on, the free ram value drops to less than 1gb (1gb normal +1gb temporary transfer cache +5gb of unused earmarked space = ~7gb),  cached value increases, but the amount of used ram remains relatively unchanged (2gb
    during transfer and slowly drops to idle values as remaining bits are written to the 2nd hard drive).  the free value is even slower to return to idle norms after the transfer completes writing data to 2nd hard drive from RAM. so, it's earmarking an addition
    5gb of ram that are completely unused during this process.  *****This is my problem*****
    Is there any way to turn this function off or limit its maximum size. in addition to sluggishness, it poses risk to data integrity from system errors/power loss, and it's difficult to discern the actual time of transfer completion, which makes it difficult
    to know when it's safe to shutdown my pc (any data left in ram is lost, and the file transfer is ruined - as of now i have to use resmon and look through what's writing to disk2 -> sometimes easy to forget about it when the transfer window closed 20-30minutes
    ago and the file is still in the process of writing to the 2nd disk).
    Any solution would be nice, and a little extra info like whether it can be applied to only 1 hard drive would be excellent.

    Thanks for the reply.
    (Although i have an undergrad degeee in computers, it's been 15years and my vocab is terrible. so, i will try my best. keep an open mind. it's not my occupation, so i rarely have to communicate ideas regarding PCs)
    It operates the same way regardless of the write-cache option being enabled. It's not using the 5gb for read/write buffer - it's merely bloating standby memory during the transfer process at a rate similar to the write speed of destination (for my situation).
    at this point i don't expect a solution. i've tried to look through lists of known memory leaks but i dont have the vocabulary to be 100% certain this problem is not documented. as of now it can't affect many people - NAS's with low bandwidth networks, usb
    attached storage etc. do bugs get forwarded from these forums? below i can outline the consistent and repeatable nature not only on my pc but on others' pcs as well (2012 forum post i found).
    I've been testing and paying a little more attention and i can describe it better:
    Just the Facts
    Resmon Memory Info: "In Use" stays consistent ~1gb (idle amount and roughly the same when nothing else is running during file transfer)
                                     "Modified" contains file transfer
    data (meta data?) which remains consistent at little over 1gb (minor fluctuations due to working as a buffer). After the file transfer window closes "Modified" slowly diminishes as it finishes lazy writing (i believe that's the term). I forget idle
    pc amount, but after transfer this is ony 58mb)
    "Standby" as the transfer starts it immediately rises to ~2gb. I'm sure this initial jump is normal. However, it will bloat well over 5gb over time with a large enough transfer increasing at a consistent rate during the entire transfer
    process. the crux of the matter.
    "Free" will drop as far as 35-50megabytes over time.
    as the transfer starts, the "Standby" increases by an immediate chunk then at a slow rate throughout entire transfer process(~1mb/s). once writing metadata to RAM no longer occurs, the "Modified" ram slowly (@500kb/s matching resmon disk
    activity for that file write) diminishes as it finishes lazy writing, After file is 100% written to destination drive, "Standby" remains a bloated figure long after.
    a 1.4gb transfer filled 3677MB of "Standby" by the time writing finished and modified ram cleared. after 20minutes, it's still bloated at 3696MB. after 30-40mins it's down to 2300mb - this is about what it jumps immediately to when transfer starts
    - it now remains at this level until i reboot.
    I notice the "standby" is available to programs. but they do not operate well. e.g. a 480p trailer on IMDB.com will stop-and-go every 2-3seconds (stream buffers fine/fast) - this would be during the worst case scenario of 35-50mb "Free"
    ram. my pc isn't and never was the latest and greatest, but choppy video never happens even with 1 or 2 resource hogs running (video processing/encoding, games, etc).
    Conjecture Below
    i think it's a problem when one device is significantly slower at writing than the source device - this is the factor that i share with others having this problem. when data is written to modified ram then sent to destination, standby memory is expanded
    until it completely or nearly fills all available RAM - If the transfer size is large enough relative to how slow the write speed of destination device is. otherwise it fills it up as much as the file size/write speed issue allows. the term "memory leak"
    is used below but may not technically be one, but it's an apt description in layman's terms.
    i saw a similar post in these forums (link at end). My problem is repeatable and consistent with others' reports. I wasn't sure if i should revive it with a reply. some of these online message boards (maybe not this one) are extremely picky
    and sensitive, lol.the world will end if an old thread revives - even if for a good reason.
    i can answer some of the ancillary issues. one person (Friday, September 21, 2012 8:33 PM) mentions not being able to shutdown, i asume he means stuck on the shutdown screen - this is because lazy writing has not completed - his nas write speed is significantly
    slower than reading from source - the last bits of data left in ram still needs to be writen to the destination. shutdown will stall for as long as needed until the data finishes writing to destination to prevent data loss.
    another person (Monday, September 24, 2012 6:31 PM) mentions the rate of the leak, but the rate is more likely a function of read speed from source relative to write speed of destination. which explains why my standby expands closer to a 1:1 ratio compared
    to his 1:100 (he said 10mb per 1000mb)
    we all have the same exact results/behaviour, but slightly different rates of bloating/leaking. as the file is written from from the ram to the destination, standby increases during this time - not a problem if read and write speeds are roughly equal (unless
    your transfering a terabytes then i bet the problem could rear its head). when writing lags, it gives the opportunity for standby ram to bloat with no maximum except the amount of installed ram. slower the write speed, the worse the problem.
    The reply on Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:04 AM has before and after pictures of exactly what i described in
    "Just the Facts". Specifically the resmon image showing the Memory Tab.
    The kb2647452 hotfix seems to do some weird things relative to this problem. in the posts that mention they've applied it: after file completes it looks like the "standby" bloat is now "in use" bloat. as per info from Tuesday, October
    09, 2012 10:36 PM - bobmtl in an earlier post applies the patch. compare images from earlier posts to his post on this date. seems like a worse problem. Also, his process list indicates it's very unlikely they add up to ~4gb as listed in the color coded bar.
    wheres the extra gb's coming from? likely the same culprit of what filled up "standby" memory for me and others. it looks like this patch relative to this problem merely recategorizes the bloat - just changes the title it falls under.
    Link:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/955b600f-976d-4c09-86dc-2ff19e726baf/memory-leak-in-windows-7-64bit-when-writing-to-a-network-shared-disk?forum=w7itpronetworking

  • Mac Mini Mid 2011 General system slowdown when transferring files?

    Hi i have a stock mac mini mid 2011, 2.5ghz i5, 4gb ram, 500gb HDD os 10.7.1 and i've noticed a general system slowdown when transferring files on 10.7 and the last 10.7.1 update ( from usb to hdd, another computer on my local network to the mini, external dvd to the mini, etc).
    I could describe the slowdown as mouse pointer movement suffers, its "laggy", application take longer to start, even menus in them from appearing, writting something on the keyboard i have to wait like 5 - 10 seconds so the words start appearing in the app (i.e. textedit).
    I wanted to know if any other new mac mini owner has had this issue and if there is any solution to this(that would not involve buying a SSD for example)?
    Im not really sure if this is a hardware or system issue but it really is getting on my nerves(i know i could just wait for the files to transfer which is what i do now but i dont think that should be), since i also have a old macbook from 2007 2.0ghz c2d, 2gb ram, 250gb HDD os 10.6.8 and have never had this problem before.
    Thanks in advanced.
    Let me know if i need to give more info on this subject.
    Edit: I forgot to mention, the funny thing is doing a time machine backup to my external HDD or transferring files from my HDD to a usb doesnt give me any kind of slowdown.

    Hi Rick, I'd see if it's reated to this, which has many symptoms...
    Try this: "sudo pmset autopoweroff 0" and "sudo pmset standby 0"
    http://xlr8yourmac.com/archives/sep13/091313.html#10.8.5SleepEjectTip

  • Data transfers from SRM to R/3

    Hi,
    i have follwing questions?
    1. How date transfer from SRM to R/3?
    2. Why PO transfer throught RFC? why not IDoc? and why confirmation and invoices are transfer using IDOC?.
    3. config document for EBP-SUS?
    Thanks
    Rams

    Hi Rams,
    The data transfers between SRM using ALE (Application Link Enabling) via RFC & IDOCs...
    P.O is transferred to R/3 using RFC. Confirmation and invoice through IDOCs.
    Since P.O is the leading document and of course legal document, there should not be any duplication. Means if it generates two P.O numbers one in SRM & the other in R/3 they are considered as two different P.Os.And will be an issue during audit.
    Where as confirmation and invoice posting documents are internal documents and the docs created in the back end with the back end number range. In this case same number is not mandatory.
    Hope this makes you more clear.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • When transferring volumes to a new drive, is a cloning app better than the finder?

    When transferring volumes to a new drive, is a cloning app better than the finder?
    I’m adding a new (bigger) external hard drive.  I have created five partions on it as the old drive has.  Is it, better, faster, more accurate, etc. to use an app, or just drag and drop the folders on to the new partitions.  The sofware I have are; TechTool6, Drive Genius3 & SuperDuper.  Two of the partitons have a Mac OS on them.  The others just have files.
    Thanks,
    Larry

    If the drive is to be functional as a boot drive then cloning is the better approach as it will grab all hidden configuration files and preserve the file access permissions properly; however, if you are setting up a data drive then the Finder's copy options should be adequate. To ensure file permissions are properly attributed to the copied files, select them and press Command-C to copy, followed by Shift-Option-Command-V to paste the items in the new location and preserve their file attributes (you may need to authenticate when copying them in this manner). If you do not need to preserve permissions then a basic drag-and-drop copy should suffice.

  • Abap import error DbSl Trace: ORA-1403 when accessing table SAPUSER

    hi all
    I am installing ERP  6.0 (ABAP) on win2003 cluster, oracle 10g, I have error at database instance intallation. here some logs
    DD03L.log
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe: START OF LOG: 20090812102157
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe: sccsid @(#) $Id: //bas/700_REL/src/R3ld/R3load/R3ldmain.c#18 $ SAP
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe: version R7.00/V1.4 [UNICODE]
    Compiled Apr  3 2009 09:03:56
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe -i DD03L.cmd -dbcodepage 4103 -l DD03L.log -stop_on_error
    DbSl Trace: ORA-1403 when accessing table SAPUSER
    (DB) INFO: connected to DB
    (RTF) ########## WARNING ###########
         Without ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY the exported data may be unusable for some databases
    (TPL) ERROR: unknown template variable "tablespace"
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe: job finished with 1 error(s)
    I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe: END OF LOG: 20090812102157
    import_monitor.log
    ERROR: 2009-08-12 10:21:57 com.sap.inst.migmon.LoadTask run
    Loading of 'DD03L' import package is interrupted with R3load error.
    Process 'I:\usr\sap\PRD\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64\R3load.exe -i DD03L.cmd -dbcodepage 4103 -l DD03L.log -stop_on_error' exited with return code 2.
    For mode details see 'DD03L.log' file.
    Standard error output:
    sapparam: sapargv( argc, argv) has not been called.
    sapparam(1c): No Profile used.
    sapparam: SAPSYSTEMNAME neither in Profile nor in Commandline
    WARNING: 2009-08-12 10:22:25
    Cannot start import of packages with views because not all import packages with tables are loaded successfully.
    WARNING: 2009-08-12 10:22:25
    1 error(s) during processing of packages.
    INFO: 2009-08-12 10:22:25
    Import Monitor is stopped.
    sapinst_dev.log
    ERROR      2009-08-12 10:22:25.718
               CJSlibModule::writeError_impl()
    CJS-30022  Program 'Migration Monitor' exits with error code 103. For details see log file(s) import_monitor.java.log, import_monitor.log.
    TRACE      2009-08-12 10:22:25.718 [iaxxejsbas.hpp:483]
               EJS_Base::dispatchFunctionCall()
    JS Callback has thrown unknown exception. Rethrowing.
    ERROR      2009-08-12 10:22:25.734 [sixxcstepexecute.cpp:951]
    FCO-00011  The step runMigrationMonitor with step key |NW_ABAP_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_CreateDBandLoad|ind|ind|ind|ind|8|0|NW_ABAP_Import_Dialog|ind|ind|ind|ind|5|0|NW_ABAP_Import|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|runMigrationMonitor was executed with status ERROR ( Last error reported by the step :Program 'Migration Monitor' exits with error code 103. For details see log file(s) import_monitor.java.log, import_monitor.log.).
    TRACE      2009-08-12 10:22:25.781 [iaxxgenimp.cpp:752]
                CGuiEngineImp::showMessageBox
    <html> <head> </head> <body> <p> An error occurred while processing service SAP ERP 6.0 Support Release 3 > SAP Systems > Oracle > High-Availability System > Based on AS ABAP > Database Instance( Last error reported by the step :Program 'Migration Monitor' exits with error code 103. For details see log file(s) import_monitor.java.log, import_monitor.log.). You may now </p> <ul> <li> choose <i>Retry</i> to repeat the current step. </li> <li> choose <i>View Log</i> to get more information about the error. </li> <li> stop the task and continue with it later. </li> </ul> <p> Log files are written to C:\Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/SYSTEM/ORA/HA/ABAP/DB. </p> </body></html>
    TRACE      2009-08-12 10:22:25.781 [iaxxgenimp.cpp:1255]
               CGuiEngineImp::acceptAnswerForBlockingRequest
    Waiting for an answer from GUI
    sapinst.log
    WARNING 2009-08-12 10:22:25.718
    Execution of the command "C:\j2sdk1.4.2_21-x64\bin\java.exe -classpath migmon.jar -showversion -Xmx1024m com.sap.inst.migmon.imp.ImportMonitor -sapinst" finished with return code 103. Output:
    java version "1.4.2_21"
    Java(TM) Platform, Standard Edition for Business (build 1.4.2_21-b03)
    Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.4.2_21-b03, mixed mode)
    Import Monitor jobs: running 1, waiting 1, completed 26, failed 0, total 28.
    Loading of 'DD03L' import package: ERROR
    Import Monitor jobs: running 0, waiting 1, completed 26, failed 1, total 28.
    ERROR 2009-08-12 10:22:25.718
    CJS-30022  Program 'Migration Monitor' exits with error code 103. For details see log file(s) import_monitor.java.log, import_monitor.log.
    ERROR 2009-08-12 10:22:25.734
    FCO-00011  The step runMigrationMonitor with step key |NW_ABAP_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_CreateDBandLoad|ind|ind|ind|ind|8|0|NW_ABAP_Import_Dialog|ind|ind|ind|ind|5|0|NW_ABAP_Import|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|runMigrationMonitor was executed with status ERROR ( Last error reported by the step :Program 'Migration Monitor' exits with error code 103. For details see log file(s) import_monitor.java.log, import_monitor.log.).
    any idea
    Regards
    ABH

    hi
    All logs are above (include import_monitor.log and java)
    thanks

  • Iphone 4s Photos not rotating correctly when transferred to computer.

    When transfering a photo or video from an iphone to a computer the pictures and videos are all updside down.  I have an iphone 4s and was wondering if this is a bug or if there is a way to fix this?  thanks
    Additional note - i use a windows 7 pc

    I am having the exact same problem. I am transferring photos via icloud to my windows 7 PC, some pictures I can rotate and others I can't. I get an error about file properties, even though the file properties are the same as the photos I can rotate. This is definitely some kind of bug.

  • PC crashes when transferring songs to ipod or using itunes..

    1) Issue: When transferring songs to IPOD through the use of a PC(itunes or real player), a blue faulty screen will eventually show with some error and then my computer restarts. I have a bout 3800 songs for a 20GB IPOD and it seems to always stop around 4G when transferring. I tried using the IPOD on another computer and it seems to be fine.
    2) Also, when I play music using iTunes, it causes the PC to crash as well, without the IPOD connected.
    During the error report, it usually says there is an error with the Hard Drive(Western Digital 250 SATA 2 hard drive; hard to use a jumper to adjust to the SATA 1 settings of this motherboards) and it couldn’t’ read it for a second. It advises to to a ScanDisk?CHKDSK run, but when I do this(during reboot), it stops in STEP 4 out of 5 at 20-30% and does nothing. Did this for 1 day! Other error reports supposedly report a faulty device driver error and advise to update drivers, but I’ve updates Apple iTunes.
    Contacted Hard Drive manufacturer, Western Digital, and they believe it is a controller device driver issue or something related. Tried updating the bios. Tried installing the VIA 4 for 1 drivers and other drivers in the Motherboards Installation CD. Running a Disk Tools before Microsoft even shows itself, reports no errors. However, when you are partially booted and the computer is scheduled to check the disk, there are errors(won’t move.) I see no update for controller device drivers
    A3) lso, if I have a USB hard drive connected to the PC(such as an IPOD or external usb hard drive), sometimes the computer switches boot devices(hard drives) and thinks that the IPOD/External Hard drive is the boot device. This is also reflected in the BIOS and the USB connected hard drive replaces my main SATA hard drive(western digital) and my computer doesn’t completely reboot unless I go under the BIOS and change it. It’s weird because I DO NOT CHANGE THE BIOS. For some reason, it changes on its own.
    I have no idea what’s going on. Please Help Me.
    My system: ASUS K8V-X, Athlon XP 3200+, 1gb corsair ddr ram, SATA Raid (2 generation) 250 Hard drive
    Monday, February 19, 2007 System Error Error code 00000077, parameter1 c0000185, parameter2 c0000185, parameter3 00000000, parameter4 01e8b000.
    Tuesday, February 20, 2007 Disk The driver detected a controller error on \Device\Harddisk2\D.
    Tuesday, February 20, 2007 System Error Error code 000000f4, parameter1 00000003, parameter2 86528b40, parameter3 86528cb4, parameter4 805c7478.

    I'm having exactly the same problem. I transfer a folder of songs to my itunes library and i choose to transfer them all and only a few get transfered and then the error message comes up.

  • Date/time stamp issue when transferring vids/pics to computer. Help please.

    Hi, i am having an issue when transferring my vids/pics from my Z2 to my PC.
    On all my previous phones when transferring media to my PC it would be copied and labelled with a date stamp followed by a picture number- an example being 2014-01-13- 0123. This has always made organising and finding my pics/vids in there relavent folders an eay task.
    The problem i am now faced with is when i transfer pics/vids from my Z2.  The pictures are stamped with DSC_0001 for example and the videos with MOV_0001. This means when on my PC i have to examine each file individually to find out its date and time of origin.
    Even more of an headache is everytime i have transferred files from my Z2 and then take more pics/vids and then try to transfer them to my PC the computer will not allow transfer as the stamp on the file i am transferring from my Z2 eg - DSC_0001 is already present on the PC from a previous transfer. This means i have to rename all the PC files first.
    I hope this makes sense and hopefully there is an easy fix.
    I am new to Android and overall i am very happy with the operating system, being a massive improvement generally over my previous phones. Fingers crossed this is down to my lack of knowledge and just involves a settings change somewhere.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hi.
    The case you described is right. But it´s not a bug.
    Why don´t you organise your pics/vids on your desktop with picasa for example. There you have many tools, also to rename your files, so that the filename contains the creation date.
    Or you use a cloud solution like dropbox, google+ or amazon clouddrive to sync pics/vids from your phone automatically.
    But never use the built-in sony playmemories. It´s really slow, pics are down-scaled to 1280x720 and vids are not synced. It´s the worst cloud-service for pics I´ve seen.
    Best
    arni

  • Sound Buzz when transferring file from Trash to desktop

    I get the occasional Sound Buzz when transferring file from Trash to desktop
    Its a Short "grounding" buzz similar to slowly plugging an electric guitar when the amp is on, but its loud !
    I am just using the internal sound,

    Brett - thanks for that input, but as stated in my original post this happens whether I do the copy within Finder, or from inside Bridge.
    Your note did inspire me to try one thing though: I UN-checked my Bridge preference to export caches to folders when possible, then I went to the folder I was trying to move (on the NAS) and did Tools > Cache > Purge Cache. I found that if the folder contained only files and no other folders, then I could move the folder to my desktop. However, if the folder in question had nested folders, then I still run into the same conflict.
    Question: since this conflict does not happen when moving a folder from one computer to another computer (but only from the NAS to a computer), I'm not sure how your logic holds when you say "Bridge is trying to cache the files you are moving and creates a ".BridgeCacheT" file before the remote version is copied"
    To answer your other question, we use AFP or at least is says "afp://server.local" when we connect. My apologies for not being an expert on this. The icon of the NAS on the desktop looks like the icons for the other computers.
    Thanks, I'm still trying to solve this. It's really become a major problem for us as we now have to drag files individually (rather than by folder) when we want to do something with them. -- Jim

Maybe you are looking for