Traces are not being generated

hi,
I have 9.1.0.8 database on windows 2003 (32 bit). I am suing following statement to start system wide tracing but i don't see any tarces being generated at user_dump_dest location. any idea what is going wrong and what thing i am missing?
ALTER SYSTEM SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 8';
Timed_statistics is set to true
Salman

Strange - what you have done should work, it works on my 10G database OK.
Sorry but dont have much else to add ...
I presume that if you just do it at session level it works ok?
ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 8';

Similar Messages

Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them.

Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them. Any clues how to fix this?

In System Center 2012 Operations Manager, the alert notification will be sent when the alert first meets all criteria, regardless of resolution state, unless resolution state itself is a criterion. If alert suppression is enabled for the rule or monitor
that raises an alert, only one notification will be sent when the subscription criteria are first met. No additional notifications will be sent until the alert is closed and a new alert is raised that meets all subscription criteria. PLease check
1) whether your rule has trun on alert supression
2) Close the alert, craised by rule, and do it again
Roger

CUP 5.3 UAR requests are not being generated

Hello,
I am having a problem setting up UAR workflow in CUP.
I have analyzed my config and tried everything given on SAP note 1290835, but I cannot still generate UAR requests (I have set role owners as UAR reviewers, but unfortunately they are not getting an approval request for UAR review.
If anyone of you has an idea of what went wrong, please help.
Thanks,
HM

HM,
Since your UAR process is based on "Role Owner" as reviewer, please ensure that each role being reviewed has Role Owner information associated.
Generally ADMIN review is advisable for both UAR/SOD reviews so that GRC Admin can cancel irrelevant requests or adjusts the reviewers.
If you have enabled the ADMIN review, then after admin review is done, schedule the UAR Review update workflow tasks so the requests are pushed to next stage(First stage - Role owner as Reviewers) of UAR review path.
If ADMIN review is not enabled requests will be directly dispatched to the role owners ASA they are generated.
Ensure that you have correct workflow path configured, SMTP server connection is working properly (for emails) and appropriate email message configured under Reviewer stage.
Once requests are moved out of ADMIN review they are no longer available in User Review--> Request Review.
To verify the current open requests use CUP Config >Request->Administration to search for open UAR requests.
As you mentioned that requests were generated but Reviewers did not receive the email, please check SMTP config and Stage level email setting.
Also note that Reviewer-Coordinator mapping is an optional part if you want to have Coordinators monitor/track incomplete reviews. If you decide to use this feature, you have to populate it before UAR requests are generated(before UAR Review Load Data job).
Let me know if you still have any issues with UAR review (ensure to mention current CUP/ERM support pack level).
Regards,
Amol

Trace file not being generated

Hi,
I am using Oracle 10g Rel2.
I am trying to generate trace file for a session using DBMS_SYSTEM.
Firstly I used DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION procedure to generate trace file for a session, but this was generating trace files in udump directory. Then i checked on net & found that we can not generate trace file this way for active sessions.
Then I tried using DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_ENV procedure, same results. This is also not generating trace files?
Any idea why this is happening? Moreover for around how much duration I should enable trace?
Thanks in advance.

Firstly I used DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION procedure to generate trace file for a session, but this was generating trace files in udump directory.
As is the normal behavior, so nothing wrong.
Then i checked on net & found that we can not generate trace file this way for active sessions.
Which is, of course, nonsense.
Then I tried using DBMS_SYSTEM.SET_ENV procedure, same results. This is also not generating trace files?
This is again nonsense.
As you didn't consider it necessary to post your exact commands, and nobody is looking over your shoulder, an adequate response is impossible.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

TRs are not being generated in Movement Type 261/262

Hi Gurus,
I am perfoming several material documents with movement type 261/262 and I don t know why in some cases the WM tab is generated without TR with only a storage bin.....so we don t have the possibility to take the TR and transform it into a TO....I have checked the configuration of the movement type in SPRO WM and everything seem to be OK, as usual....Any clue on this?
Many Thanks!!!!
Regards

Q1 : If I perform 261 in MIGO or in MB1A in a WM warehouse which It has NOT activated the PP-WM interface. the behavior will be the same ? - Yes, because selection of storage type and storage bin is from the control cycle which plays a major role if control cycle is not defined then system accepts standard 914 as destination storage type if control cycle is defined then it ignores standard SAP value and pick the storage type and bin from the control cycle.
Goods Issue w/ref. to the PP order will be created without TR and to a storage bin in Storage Type 100? and on the contrary, - Even if you do a Goods issue w/ref and control cycle is not defined then at the time of production order creation system update reservation table with blank entry under warehouse / storage type & storage bin and once you will do the MIGO for this system will consider 914 as storage type
if the control cycle is define then the value in RESB will be like below screen
if in this example I generate a 261 as Goods Issue Others the WM tab will have Intermediate Storage Type 914 and it will have a TR number?? ---Since this is without reference in the MIGO you will not find the Reservation tab and system will go with Standard SAP (914) storage type

Reports not being Generated

I use Crystal Reports with another program that supposed to generate 2 reports with a click of a button, but it is not working. The reports are not being generated. I installed Crystal Reports on my system twice and there doesn't seem to be a problem with the installation, but the program is not working. Please help.

I am fairly new at this so let me try my best to answer these questions:
Crystal Reports XI
Visual Studio? Not sure
No service pack applied. How and where do i get it?
I am using Windows XP
I am not viewing the reports as it has to be generated before i am able to view and the systems does nothing after I click the generate button
No have not tried to view a single report; i don't know how.
I have not used Crystal reports designer for anything else.
Edited by: Sharon Aird on Dec 1, 2008 5:05 PM

ADDM report not being generated

I noticed that addm reports are not being generated from last 2 days. So I did the following:
SQL> exec dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot;
BEGIN dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-13516: AWR Operation failed: only a subset of SQL can be issued
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 10
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 33
ORA-06512: at line 1
I got above error. I am not sure what that means. I also ran below SQL:
SQL> select nam.ksppinm name, val.KSPPSTVL, nam.ksppdesc description
2 from x$ksppi nam, x$ksppsv val
3 where nam.indx = val.indx and
4 nam.ksppinm = '_awr_restrict_mode'
5 order by 1
6 ;
awrrestrict_mode
FALSE
AWR Restrict Mode
What could be the reason that the reports are not being generated anymore

Check Note:308003.1 - AWR Snapshots Not Generating

Default Personnel No. Ranges not being generated through NUMKR

Default personnel number ranges according to the company / client are not being generated. what should I do further to fix the problem?

Hi first go to PA04 and maintain the different number ranges as stated above.
01 1 to 2000
02 2001 to 5000 etc
here 01, 02 are different number ranges.
In your case maintain a number range number 6 with a range as per your requirement.
Then go to PE03 NUMKR feature.
Create subnodes using Personnel Area with a return value as the number range number.
So in you case decision tree should look like should look like
NUMKR
WERKS
GUJ1 ( PA for Gujraat)
06 ( return value = number range number )
Hope this helps.
Ajay

FI documents generated from RE-FX are not being summarized

The Fi documents generated from periodic posting in RE-FX are not being summarize, even thou the have the same customer, the same flow type and account determination.
I checked the corresponding customizing Item related and the seem to be right. The system seems to be skiping this.
I have 2 conditions in the RE contract that goes to the same flow type and account determination but the document is generated with the two separated line item.
Tanks in advance
Noel.

Hi Noel,
I guess you have already checked your customizing.
If you are technically interested you may have a look into the
coding to see which fields are checked and must be equal for
summarization.
class: CL_RERA_DOC_ITEM_CNDS
method: CONDENSE_APAR_ITEMS
If you set a breakpoint there and follow the program you may see why the items are not condensed.
Regards, Franz

BPM alert not being generated

Hi guys,
I'm having quite a little trouble in doing one thing which has been done for several times but which is giving me a hard time...
I've created a bpm process which in an error condition will trigger a simple alert.
I've tested the process and everything goes allright, except the alert. What is happening? Well, the alert is not being sent to my inbox. Why? Maybe because the alert is not being generated.
I've went to sxmb_moni_bpe and everything is OK. I can see the message of the alert being fired. After that I went to slg1 to see if my alert is being generated, and the answer is no. It's not being generated....
I've gone through Michal's blogs and everything was checked...The question is, if I execute RSALERTTEST with my alert category, the alert is generated and send to my inbox. Do you have any ideas?
Thanks a lot for your attention

Hi,
Yes the job scheduling is needed only for Sp14 and below.
Can you recheck if the Alert is actually getting triggered or not in the BPM in the control step? Make sure that you have given the correct Alert Category in your Control Step and also, make sure that the recipient in your alert as well as the Alert Inbox entry you are seeing is the same.
Finally, refresh the Alert Inbox.
Regards,
Bhavesh

SWF File not being generated by compiler

I am using Flash Builder 4.5.
One of the modules that compiles without error is still not being bound into the runtime image (in this case debug).
There are no compiler errors (auto build is switched ON) but a swf file is not being generated.
I have tried removing the reference to the module in the Project ->Properties->Modules window and then adding it back in to no avail.
This was working up until I made a change to the module in question and then saved it.

I would check all imported images in the library. If you cannot see the image in your library preview; there is a good chance that there is an issue and it will need to be reimported.

Spool file not being generated in production server

Hello
Our end users are using automatic payment program F110 to print multiple cheques.
The settings in SPAD are identical in Quality and Production Server,but some how
spool file is not being generated in production.
Test printing is fine in Quality server.
Printer being used is Epson LQ 300.Device type is EPESCP2.
We are using z custom page size ,and it is assigned to printer device Type as well
Would be very great if some can can comment on which settings to check,as SPAD setting is
same in both server ,yet no spool.Very Very urgent.
Iam not sure ,whose domain is it now-BASIS or ABAP.
Thanks a lot
Nouman

If there is a problem with the spool, the variant that is being in F110 parameters.
As you are saying the quality system is working fine, please compare both the variants in Production and Quality systems.
This should solve your situation.

DAC source system parameters not being generated

HI all,
We are implementing BI apps 7962 with Informatica 861 Hot FX11, OBIEE 101341 on Linux5. We have installed and set up the configuration completely. The Informatica services are created and the DAC was configured with the Source System Parameters. When I generated the execution plan parameters, the files are being generated in the SRC files folder. But it seems like the source system parameters I set in the DAC client are not being picked up.
For example I have set the Initial Extract date as 1/1/2008. But when I ran the load and saw the log files it still seems like the Initial Extract date is 1/1/1970. We have set the custom property for Integration Service overrideMpltVarWithMapVar as Yes. Please help me if any one has seen this before.
Thanks
MN
Edited by: MNRK on Apr 5, 2011 12:49 PM

Hi,
When you have configured all the tasks in DAC, while running the loads DAC will generate the parameter files at runtime.
You need to make sure that parameterfileDW.txt and parameterfileOLTP.txt files are present in DAC Installation Directory\bifoundation\DAC\Informatica\Parameter\Input folder.
If these files are not present in the above mentioned location then you need to copy them from Informatica Installation Directory\PowerCenter 8.6.1\server\Infa_Shared\SrcFiles folder.
Hope this helps...................
Thanks,
Navin Kumar Bolla

Some Purchase Requistions are not being replanned during SNP Heuristics

Hi All,
Has anyone experienced any issue with purchase requisitions not being replanned during the SNP heuristics run (background or interactive). I have a product location combination and about half of the PRs are not being replanned and these are not fixed/firmed. When I say replannned I mean that they are not generating a new Purchase req. #. I have no idea why at this point. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Regards,
Rumi

Rumi,
we faced a ismilar issue and figured out that the issue was due to the change in MoT for the Preq. The earlier Preqs were created with MoT 'Ship' which was then changed to 'Plane'. When we ran the heuristic the Preqs created with Ship were not recreated. This is a standard SAP APO behaviour.
I am sure that after deleting these preqs all subsequent runs would be working fine for you.
Nxet time if it happens consider what I have said, it could be a possible reason.
Abhi

Early Watch Reports are not getting generated.

Hi Experts,
I'm new to Solution Manager.
We were getting EWA report regularly till last month in solution manager.
But for the past one month the reports are not getting generated and I'm getting the following error message.
Kindly help
The data for this session is overdue. Data has not yet been transferred from the associated satellite system.
Go to the Service Data Control Center (transaction SDCCN) in the satellite system and check why the data has not been sent.
Typical sources of errors are:
The RFC connection for the SAP Solution Manager system is not working.
The 'Task Processor' background job, which collects the session data, has been changed.
Problems arose while data was being collected (see the detail log for the task that collects the session data).
A periodic 'SDCC Maintenance Package' task has not been scheduled to check whether your SAP Solution Manager system requests session data.
Session number: 1000000000704
Thanks,
Shanahas

Hi,
The maintanance package is getting executed everyday. However, it is throwing some error.
I have checked the RFC connection and they are working fine.
Here with I'm attaching part of the log i got for the maintance package error.
Pls help
Maintenance Package completed
> Maximum number of retries reached ( 0003 )
Updating license data completed from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK [Maintenance Package]
Error updating license data from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK [Maintenance Package]
Retrieval of license data failed from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK
> ( AGS_MK_GET_MAINT_KEYS )
> Function module for retrieval of license data not available on Solution Manager
Updating license data started from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK [Maintenance Package]
Error refreshing service definitions from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK
> Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts
> error reading function module interface BDL_DO_SESSION_REFRESH_NEW from SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK
> Re-entry after error
Refresh of service definitions started from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK [Maintenance Package]
Refresh sessions from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK finished [Maintenance Package]
> Sessions cannot be refreshed from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK ( SOM , 0020312095 )
> Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts
> error reading function module interface DSWP_API_SESSIONLIST_GET from SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK
Refresh sessions from destination SM_SOMCLNT100_BACK started [Maintenance Package]
Refresh sessions from destination SDCC_OSS finished [Maintenance Package]
> Sessions are up to date
Refresh sessions from destination SDCC_OSS started [Maintenance Package]
> Not due, due every 7 day(s), last successful run 10.07.2011 21:20:24
Delete old session and log data :
Maintenance Package started
Thanks,
Shanahas

Traces are not being generated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for