Tracking Status update in delivery

Hi folks,
       I have a situation where an inbound idoc comes from the freight forwarder to update the Tracking status and the POD Name (Name of the Person who receive the goods) in the delivery document.
The tracking status details are stored in a different table VTRKH for the Delivery Document. How to update this table fields using appropriate idoc?
      Can anyone plz tell me the exact Idoc type and the message type to be used to get this done.
Thanks in Adv

Hey Suresh,
Did you find a solution to this issue that you had....I am trying to acheive a similar result. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • POD And Tracking status update (e.g from FEDEX) onto delivery

    Dear ABAPers,
    Here's the problem:
    A third party carrier like FEDEX sends in constant updates about our shipment referencing our delivery number via EDI214. I have to find a way to update this information ( Tracking Status, Tracking Text, etc) onto the delivery using an IDOC(delvry03). The information will be on GOTO->HEADER->PARCEL TRACKING on the delivery.
    Has anyone done this before, please let me know.
    Thanks in advance

    Hey Suresh,
    Did you find a solution to this issue that you had....I am trying to acheive a similar result. Please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Delivery status update in sales document at PGI

    Normally system updates the delivery status of sales document line level, when a delivery document is created with respect to that sales document line.
    But I want system to update the delivery status (in sales doc. line) when PGI is done for respective delivery document; not at the creation of delivery document. Below I have shown the status updating scenarios that I expect.
    Scenario 1
    Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
    Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
    PGI: Not done
    Status in Sales document line should be A (Open)
    Scenario 2
    Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
    Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
    PGI: 50 PCs
    Status in Sales document line should be B (Partially delivered)
    Scenario 3
    Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
    Delivery Doc qty: 100 PCs
    PGI: 100 PCs
    Status in Sales document line should be C (Fully delivered)
    Can anyone propose a possible way of doing this (configuration/ user exits/ BADI etc,)?
    Thanks,
    Ramindu

    Hi,
    I dont know it with the use of  ABAP development, but by functional logic, can suggest you to configure the rush order sales configuration for your particular sales order.
    just check that availability of that particualar sales order is met or not prior to it.
    and then automatically when your delivery doc is created, PGI would be done and the status of your sales order would be updated with it.
    try it out on your development client, if it works out.
    regards,
    Siddharth.

  • Status is not updated from delivery to sales order item.

    Dear Folks,
    One user created sales order with 10 line items and he created delivery and later he deleted line item 30 in that delivery document and with remaining 9 line item he done the PGI & Billing.Here what is the problem is the deleted line item in sales order status showing as completed and delivered quatity showing as 10.Status is not updated from delivery to sales order item.Please let me know how to resolve this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    murali.

    Dear Murali,
    Please go to VTLA transaction then select your delivery and order types after that go in to the details of the item level settings here you check field called Update document flow under Control data tab.
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Sales Order -- Update the delivery Document Credit status using FM or BAPI

    hi All,
    The requirment is quite urgent......  Actually i am Using a userexit V56FSTAT through VT02N and want to update the credit status through VKM4 Transation. But i require a Function module or Bapi to Update the credit status of the delivery status.
    Please do give me suitable Function module or Bapi through which i can perform the VKM4 transation to update the credit status of delivery document....

    when we go to vkm4 there we click on the reassign button and save then the status is changed in VBUK table....
    so i have to perform this steps through VT02N transation....
    Ny ways thanks for the reply,
    i guess i require more support fom u all
    Message was edited by:
            siddharth samal

  • Status update

    Background : In TMS project IDOC interface is used to send out data from SAP to the external transportation planning systems. This interface includes sending of information related to outbound deliveries, which is performed with specific message type ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS. As soon as external system receives outbound delivery data from SAP it generates response messages with technical acknowledgment (message type STATUS) and sends it back to SAP. Then external system process data received from SAP and as data is processed, message with Functional acknowledgement (message type STATUS) is generated and sent out to SAP through XI.
    In SAP STATUS messages update outbound delivery messages ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS with new statuses received from external system. In this way it is possible to have information in SAP regarding outbound delivery processing in External system.
    The problem related to status update process is found. In some cases even STATUS IDOCs are created in correct order in SAP, they update ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS messages in incorrect order. And it makes not possible to track actual processing status of outbound deliveries in external system with message ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS status record.
    Requirements
    Basic requirement is to have status for outbound message TMS_TMS1_TPSDLS which reflects progress of data processing in external system.
    The right sequence of status scheme is to process technical acknowledgment before the functional acknowledgment.
    Can any one help ?

    Hi,
    One more method is to provide Milestone timing for critical loads/availability of reports.
    For eg consider you have one chain loading data into a few critical targets. Depending on the data volume, load timings and post processing identify a critical milestone time by which everyday the chains should be complete. say 9.00 AM in clients time zone (normal beginning of business day when clients may expect a report).
    Only in the scenario where its delayed you have to inform client through a mail with the reason for delay and expected time of availability. Otherwise when there is no delay its understood that data is available.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    JituK

  • Status of Outbound Delivery in case of batch split

    Hi All,
    I have a query regarding the status updation of outbound delivery in case of a batch split.
    I have a delivery with 10 qty of batch managed material and is distributed from ERP to EWM. As per standard SAP, the following 2 options exist to carry out a batch split in EWM
    1. Create batch sub items in the Outbound delivery Order
    2. To adopt quantities pertaining to multiple batches during WT creation from the 'Stock can be removed' tab.
    We are using the second option as per business requirement. The process is working fine if i create & confirm multiple WT's at one shot i.e in this case i created one WT for 5 qty with batch-1 & one more WT for balance 5 qty with batch-2 & confirmed both the tasks. System created 2 batch sub items automatically when WT's are confirmed & the header status of 'picking' got updated as 'completed'.
    However the problem is when i create only 1 WT for partial quantity. For eg. in this case i created onle WT for 5 qty of batch-1 & confirmed the task. System created 1 batch sub item for 5 qty & also updated the 'picking' status in header to completed. My understanding is that since entire delivery quantity is yet to be picked, the picking status at header must be 'partially completed' & not 'completed'.
    I have checked the status profile & have status types DER & DPI active. Does this require any config in the status profile OR Is there any other way in which i can achieve this functionality ( i.e. Header status must be 'partially completed' untill entire delivery quantity is picked.)
    Would be glad if you can share your thoughts on this.
    Regards,
    Smitha Pai.

    Thank you for your kind reply.
    I performed failover to my physical standby and now archives are going on my logical standby from new primary but changes are not getting applied on my logical standby database.
    when i tried to register the logical logfile from new primary on my logical standby i am getting following error.
    SQL> ALTER DATABASE REGISTER LOGICAL LOGFILE 'E:\orcl1\stdb\archives\TESTDBT001S00001.ARC';
    ALTER DATABASE REGISTER LOGICAL LOGFILE 'E:\orcl1\stdb\archives\TESTDBT001S00001.ARC'
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01287: file is from a different database incarnation

  • STPPOD - DELVRY03 -GR Status Update in SNC

    When we create an ASN in SNC  with single material, mutiple line items corresponding to different PO's with a specific delivery date  and when we post GR in ECC against this ASN and  to send POD status update to SNC when RSMIPROACT batch job is run - We are noticing GR status update is happeing for the material in one line item with one PO but the other line item for the same material with different PO is not getting status update.
    when we checked the ECC - DELVRY03 -Idocs they are getting generated only for single line item of ASN  not for other line item.
    Note : This scenario is with ASN with multiple line items here the Material is only one - Each line item has same material but different PO and whole of ASN would be with specific delivery date.
    Can any one pls let me know if an ASN with multiple line items ( for single material) when GR is posted and when we send the GR status info (POD) to SNC thru Batch job - how it works.
    I have checked PO history for the 2 PO's of same material - it is getting updated correctly.
    Would appreciate your immediate help.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

    Hi Mahesh
    I have created an ASN for the same material with specific delivery date, with mulitiple line items belonging to different PO.
    I have posted a STPPOD idoc from ECC against the inbound delivery using VL32N.(Goods Reciept against inbound delivery)
    It is posting to all the PO's and all are updated properly
    Also can you check whether you DELVRY03 idoc has E1EDL24(Delivery Item) as many as your ASN line items????
    Like if you three line items in ASN, then there should be three E1EDL24 segments carrying the info..
    Best Regards
    Vinod
    Edited by: Vinod Kumar Pedapati on Sep 16, 2010 11:35 AM

  • Facebook: status update

    I am using the widget that came with the phone.  Trying to do a facebook status update.  When I try to post I get the following error. 
    =====[snippet]
    Can't send response now. 
    Data services are unavailable. 
    =====[snippet]
    Any ideas or solutions other than a factory reset.   I have a data plan and am able to browse.  Let me know. 
    Thanks. 
    GWShark

    gwsharkcom wrote:
    I am using the widget that came with the phone.  Trying to do a facebook status update.  When I try to post I get the following error. 
    =====[snippet]
    Can't send response now. 
    Data services are unavailable. 
    =====[snippet]
    Any ideas or solutions other than a factory reset.   I have a data plan and am able to browse.  Let me know. 
    Thanks. 
    GWShark
    Do you have a 3g connection? If not, if you will need to change a setting or use WiFi to use the data services.
    To change the setting to use the regular (SLOW) network, go to settings->data manager->Data Delivery, and press on Data Roaming. That will allow data services while not on Verizon's 3g service.

  • Status Updation In Document flow

    Hi,
    we are having scenario which contain sales order - PO - Delivery - Billing.
    when I am looking the document flow of sales order the status of SO, Delivery and billing systum is showing correctly but
    status of PO is not getting display its blank in Document flow.
    what are the probable reasons for this?
    is there any note require to update here?
    regards,
    anup

    Hi,
    On initial screen system will not show status.and it is standard
    Rather select sales order and click on STATUS OVERVIEW at item level you can able to see status of P.O
    Purch. requisition -  Purch.req. available
    Purch.confirm.status - All schedLine confrm    confirmed
    Invoice recipt status - Complete invoice rpt     Posted
    Kapil

  • Status update for MeeGo on the N900

    Here's a copy of the text sent by Harri Hakulinen from Nokia. He is the project lead for MeeGo on the N900. This message was sent to the MeeGo developer mailing list just now:
    Hello MeeGos !
    This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valtteri in TSG meeting, we are looking into going more open mode shortly. One reason why we have done this on this way is that at the same time we have been trying to handle opening of many currenly closed components that are needed in MeeGo and to build feasible MeeGo images for N900.
    However, a lot of related work is already done completely open, you can find more info from places like ofono.org, connman.net and meego.gitorious.org . So if you are eager to contribute or want to closely follow whats happening, please work on those.
    As you know, we have delivered working MeeGo images for N900 as part of first code drop in the end of March. At that state we were using older kernel version on N900 than on Atom side, as we used the same kernel (.28) than what is used in Maemo 5 based products today. We ended up doing that simply because lack of time to contribute and port all the drivers to the newer kernels.
    Now, for the upcoming May release of MeeGo, we are going to use the same kernel version (.33) than Atom based devices are using. For that we need to submit number of ARM-architecture patches to MeeGo as well, because many of the required ones have just been contibuted upstream kernel and were not available in .33 version originally.
    We have already enabled most of the main drivers, like LCD, GFX, Wlan and BT. Still, there is a lot to do in order to enable .33 on N900, like audio drivers, and modem subsystem including SSI buss driver, modem data and audio drivers etc. Our adaptation guys are in fact contributing those modem subsystem related drivers as we speak, and if you are following kernel mailing lists you can see how that goes on.  
    Besides of enabling the new kernel, we are working with number of smaller and bigger issues for N900. Starting from the beginning, we are now based on ARMv7 combiled code, so the code should be better optimised for N900 now. ARMv5 compilation that was in use for code drop will still be there, and it also seems to be used at least by community project that is planning to release MeeGo for good old N810 tablets
    Also, we are planning to enable dual booting of Maemo 5 and MeeGo for the upcoming release. So that will be offered as 3rd way to setup MeeGo to N900, including the existing "native" MeeGo only on N900 and chroot based MeeGo on Maemo 5 setups. Taking the dual boot mode into use likely includes upgrade to Maemo5 kernel as well, but that should not be big issue in the process of enabling that.
    As I don't want to go ahead of others working on MeeGo architecture and other issues I will stop now, but I will report again when we have more to tell about the subject.
    Br,
    // Harri

    Here's another update..
    It seems that MeeGo on the N900 is not directly being driven by Nokia! It's an open project.. so the net result is MeeGo on the N900 may look and feel very different to Meego on the N900's sucessor
    Either way, I'm certainly greatful for their efforts!
    Hello Meego's,
    As indicated in my previous mail about "MeeGo for N900" status, we were planning to open up our MeeGo work around N900. Now I am happy to announce, that we are there
    First, to make it absolute clear for everybody: This is about open MeeGo adaptation to N900 device.
    Like any other MeeGo project, it is open source project for all applicaple purposes, and does NOT directly have links to any potential Nokia product or potential product plans. So, based on this or any other of my posts, please do NOT start or continue speculation of upcoming Nokia MeeGo releases. That is practically not helpfull, and mostly only takes our time when we need to explain our words and actions in detail to various directions. 
    From our part, we are trying to implement the open development model that has been discussed now so many times around MeeGo. On practical terms, we are trying to work based on proposal by Carsten Munk, see
    http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_Best_Practices_for_working_in_a_MeeGo_team 
    We have already created some resources that will be used by the team, you can learn about those and the upcoming ones from http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900. We have IRC channel for realtime discussion, we will use meego-dev mailing list for normal discussions and announcements, and we will have Gitorius project for code.
    We will evolve our practicies during the work, so if you are interested, stay tuned to those channels. I belive that soon we are also able to figure out, what is best way for community members to help us in development, and then effectively be part of the team. 
    I would also like to use this as opportunity to introduce the team behind this work (so far) and also thank them about their hard work and long hours. We have team that consist of some Nokia subcontractors and also growing team of Nokia personel:
    "MeeGo for N900" team (so far)
    - Cybercom Turku team; Marko Saukko, Jouni Peltonen, Sami Sirkiä, Jari Smura and Luka Milovanov.
    - Cybercom Tampere team; Kalle Lampila,Teemu Tuominen,Tuukka Mäkinen and Ville Marjusaari.
    - Carsten Munk via Nomovok
    - Jarkko Nikula via Atomide
    - Jan-Simon Möller from Linuxfoundation
    - Nokia team; Alexander Kanevskiy, Felipe Contreras, Markus Lehtonen, Ameya Palande, Sakari Poussa, Roger Quadros and me.
    In addition to official project team, many Nokia people have helped us despite their hectic daily work, even with their free time. Most of them are driven by the desire to open, repurpose and upstream all relevant sw that has been originally created for Maemo 5 based N900 product during previous years.
    Marko, Jouni, Sami & Luka and Markus were working with me already on last year when we did prototypes and interoperability tests of Maemo & Moblin stuff combined in different ways. Based on those we had pretty good picture of what we are doing and why. 
    And of course, we have had very good and productive co-operation with various Intel teams since those times. Anas Nashif and many others from Intel's MeeGo team have done a lot for us by enabling ARM stuff in MeeGo OBS and repositories.
    Last but not least, I want to give special thanks to Stskeeps (alias Carsten Munk . He has teached us how to operate on open, and he has also done respectable amount of this work since early days of Meego. In addition to that, I belive that his earlier work on Maemo community and on Mer project has in fact inspired all of us and shown a way to MeeGo alredy years ago.
    Br,
    //Harri

  • Picking status in Out. delivery changed to status A after GR post with MB0A

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue in our production system, these is the scenario:
    - Replenishment delivery
    - ZPicking confirmation idoc sucessfully picked the outbound delivery and post the GI.  The material was cut and it was batch splitted.
    - Then it was performed a GR (mov 101)  against a stock transfer order via MB0A.
    - After this GR posted, the status of picking of the parent material of the batch split was changed from status " " (Not relevant) to status "A" (Not yet processed).
    - Also the status at header level was changed.
    Current status of the delivery
    Header Status
    Picking Confirmation --> B
    Total Gds mvt status --> B
    Item Status
    Item 10:
        Pick confirmation --> A
        Goods movt --> B
    We have tried to reverse the GI to generate it again and reset the statuses but it is not possible to do it via VL09 neither MBST, etc.
    Any idea on how to correct this problem?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    What is the moment type being taken for PGI through idoc?check the moment type definition for its allowable transactions and foe reverse.
    Regards,

  • Unable to run bapis for project status update and date update together

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement to update the dates and status of a project WBS at level 4. I am trying to do update the CJ02 Transaction using standard BAPI available. I need to do both Date update and status update in the same LOOP PASS   i am using the below mention bapi. when i am doing so i am getting an error Project 'A._____' has been currently processed by ID i.e. my id.
    I have tried putting  a wait for 2 seconds in the code but its still not working. please find the order below in which i am calling the bapi.
    Loop at itab.
    if  date_changed = 'X'.
          CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN'
          READ TABLE it_error WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    Commit
            CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
                 EXPORTING
                      wait   = c_x
                 IMPORTING
                      return = s_ret.
       endif.
    endif.
    if Status_change = 'X'.
          CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION' .
          CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2054_SET_STATUS'
          READ TABLE t_result WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
          IF sy-subrc NE 0.
            CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
                 TABLES
                      et_return = t_ret.
            CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
                 EXPORTING
                      wait   = c_x
                 IMPORTING
                      return = s_ret.
         ENDIF.
    endif.
        WAIT UP TO 4 SECONDS.
    endloop.

    Try to use
    SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL.
    before each BAPI call.
    Did you try to debug through your code, leaving sufficient time between BAPI calls? If it does work like that, then the above statement might help.

  • HT4314 hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

    hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

    And the answer is: 
    williamfromlongueuil wrote:
    we have the same itunes account in game center
    You need to have your own account...  DUH....

  • Status Update of Service Order From Billing Document

    Dear Experts,
    I am told to change the User status of Service Order once the Billing Document is Generated.
    Here we are in CRM 2007 and i have done the status update of previous document but here
    Billing document is not possible to read through CRM_ORDER_READ (function module).
    Do any one have any idea how do i proceed.
    Thanks,
    SA

    hi sa
    to change the service order user status , when biling document is generated
    make an implementation of bill_acc_if  bai and in the method ENRICH_ACC_DOCUMENT
    read order data using crm_order_read  and change the status using
    CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN
    thnks
    sam

Maybe you are looking for