Trading partner is in Approved state.

Hi All
We have 18 Agreements ,14 document types , 2 remote trading partners.
Recently our trading partners have changed there host name so we had to modify host name and trading partner's certificate .
After modifying these detaiils , trading partners are in Approved state.
How to deploy these new changes so that it comes back in deployed state?
Should be export and import full configuration from Adminstration tab ? OR should be retire or quiese already deployed agreements first ?
Please advice.

It seems you are working with 10g however Nitesh is guiding you for 11g. Just take the export of already deployed agreements (for back-up), retire the existing configurations, now all agreements should come into draft state. Make whatever changes you want, and after that save, validate and deploy the all agreements again. One configuration may have many agreements, so you may deploy all agreements as part of one configuration or you may create separate configuration for each agreement. It's your choice.
Regards,
Anuj

Similar Messages

Diffrent Trading partner in electronic bank statement

Hi,
our customer (ERP 5.0) needs for the same account in diffrent accounting areas more than on trading partner.
Example:
Account 1234567 - BUKRS 1000 - trading partner (VBUND) 100
Account 1234567 - BUKRS 2000 - trading partner (VBUND) 200
My problem is that VBUND is administrated in SKA1, so I can not save VBUND in database. And my second and main problem is - using the electronic bank statement FF_5 - in User Exit "EXIT_RFEBBU10_001" - there seems to be no interface vor the field VBUND.
Does anybody have an idea?
How can I assign the right VBUND addicted to the right BUKRS in the user exit?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
why not using substitution Rule,
If Account 1234567 - BUKRS 2000 - trading partner (VBUND), Repleace with 100 to 200,
it is very simple compare to User exit

Using a Trading Partner Directory Implementation for Companies

Hello experts,
I am looking into configuring delegate useradmin using companies.
The UME approach requires a engine reboot and somhow doesnt fit our requirements.
The second approach - "Trading partner directory implementation" seems feasible.
To implement this do I need to have any additional Bussiness package or additional installation for my portal? The document does state that this approach is only available with SAP supplier relationship management. What does this mean??
thanks,
Vineeth

Hello Peng Ronan,
Did you have any success with your Trading Partner Directory?
Our project includes ECC, CRM 5.1, SRM6.0 and Portal7.0. We have this CRM scenario where a customer (manager) logs on and approves one of his employees, already self-registered, as a customer Portal user. UME seems to support that scenario, but it can only retrieve company information from a SRM backend system using a custom implementation of the Trading Partner Directory interface. In our case it is a CRM scenario and CRM Business Partners are not replicated on SRM.
What is that SRM Trading Partner Directory interface and how much effort is involved in this custom implementation?
Does the portal need to restart for new Companies to be added?
Is this only for EBP scenario?
Is there a better way to update the list of companies in UME from a list of CRM Business Partner?
Thanks

In XML Gateway Responsibility How to add User defined Trading Partner type.

Hi,
We have a requirements to add user defind Trading Partner Type apart from the default trading partner type.
How to do this? If any one know , kinldy let me explain it
Thanks

I looked it up in the mean time ...
The docs state that you only can use simple data type or java.util.list or AttributeList (which is a wrapper for any viewRow). So I guess you have to somehow flatten your complex data type or create a custom VO which holds it.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/b31974/bcextservices.htm#CJAEHFJD
Scroll down to 11.2.3
Timo

Trading partner on Business Area Clearing Account

Hi,
I have configured business area wise financial statements for my client. But when doing cross-company code postings, the BA is not getting transferred to the company code clearing accounts. Is there a way to get it to transfer automatically ?
In the mean time, I am using Balance sheet adjustments to resolve this, but the trading partner on the original document line item is not getting copied to the business area clearing account. Is there a way to get the trading partner to get transferred to the BA clearing account?
Also, by looking at the line items of the BA clearing account, is there a way I can determine the original account that was adjustment?
Any recommendations of how I can handle this are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
ALAS

hai,
Goto T.Code Se38 and give SAPF180K it will display any error. then you correct the error and rerun again F.5d & f.5e. It will work.
Problem because of Reconciliation acount. It means all the reconciliation account need to be mapped in OBXM with business area clearing account.
And also Cash Gl account needs cash clearing account. because you will not able to enter business area in Cash account. (corresponding entry will have the business area)
Try this. If you have any problem mail me back.
govind.

Trading Partner Agreement Not found error in EDI EDIFACT Scenario

Hello all,
I am getting the following error in the trace file in the EDI EDIFACT over Generic Exchange Scenario,i have verified the agreement effective to date,i also have checked the enq_orders.properties & enq_ordrsp.properties on both the servers and the FromParty Name and ToParty Name are shown correctly.so where does the actual problem occur can anyone plz help me out to solve this issue.
MsgID = C0A8010111EF3AC936E0000068CB7800
ReplyToMsgID = null
FromParty = Acme
ToParty = Acme
EventName = Exception
DoctypeName = Exception
DoctypeRevision = 1.0
MsgType = 3
payload length = 1820
*<Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">*
*<correlationId>null</correlationId>*
*<b2bMessageId>C0A8010111EF3AC936E0000068CB7800</b2bMessageId>*
*<errorCode>AIP-50547</errorCode>*
*<errorText>Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From partyNAME "Acme", To partyNAME "Acme", Business action name "Process_ORDERS"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate</errorText>*
*<errorDescription>*
*<![CDATA[Machine Info: (mcity94)*
*Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate*
*StackTrace:*
*Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/] "Acme", To partyNAME "Acme", Business action name "Process_ORDERS"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate*
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementNameByBaTPName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2225)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:181)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:511)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processIncomingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:229)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1715)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2404)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2303)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2258)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:500)**
**     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:348)**
**     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)**
*]]>*
*</errorDescription>*
*<errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>*
*</Exception>*
Thanx
Sunny
Edited by: sunny kay on Jan 20, 2009 7:45 AM

Hi
Since the error states "Process_ORDERS" as the Business action I assume you are trying to enq the ORDERS document from Acme to GlobalChips. The issue then would be due to the fact that there is a trailing space character after the GlobalChips
Please check for a space (or spaces) after
to = GlobalChips
Also ensure that the UI has the trading partner with the same spelling ie. GlobalChips and not Globalchips
Thanks,
--Arun

Use of trading partner field in GL Master, Vendor and Customer Master

Can anybody explain in detail what is the use of trading partner in masters.
In GL Master, whether it needs to be updated for all the GLs or only a specific GLs.

The Trading partner field in customer and Vendor master is used to identify the affiliated companies involved in intercompany transactions.
The trading partner field is copied into the account receivable and payable transactions from the customer and vendor master. The Trading partner field also appears in the line items of the offsetting clearing accounts via substitutons.
The trading partner field subsequently can be used during consolidation to eliminate intercompany receivables and payables from the balance sheet and eliminate Intercompany sales and expense figures from the P&L statement.
Customer or vendor invoice: Trading partner information is captured from the customer and vendor master.
Invoice receipts against clearing account and transfers with clearing: While posting Invoice receipt during an Intercompany transaction, the invoice receipt can be posted to a clearing account instead of expense account. The selection of open items must be restricted to those with a certain trading partner when posting a transfer later on, as the trading partner is copied into the transfer line item.
Customer and Vendor Payments: If document types for payments are configured to allow for more than one trading partner in a payment document then the trading partner is copied only on the customer and vendor line item and not on the offsetting entry.
Assets transferred between company codes: If an asset is transferred between group company codes, two accounting documents are generated in each of the involved company codes. The trading partner of each document must be set to the company id of the other company code.
When goods are received from group company code the trading partner is picked for the inventory and GR/IR line items from the vendor mentioned on the order. If invoices are open as on the balance key date then group-internal provisions are created from the GR/IR accounts. These provisions can later be eliminated in Consolidation system.
Regards,
Gaurav

ZBA in EBS - Trading partner issue

Hi SAP gurus
Can anyone help me with how you folks set up populating the trading partner field for ZBA postings in EBS?
I read in a lot of places & here are the pointers I already have.
- We can fill the trading partner field in GL master data assuming we have one GL account for each partner company code (will not work for us as we do not intend to have one GL per company partner)
- We can use BADI to fill up trading partner for the specific document type (dont know what other parameters I have to pick correct trading partner)
- We can use substitution rule for the doc type (dont know what other parameters I have to pick correct trading partner)
- use search string to fill target field (but I do not see Trading partner as target field there)

Solved this issue using the following thread.
Electronic Bank Statements With Assignment field update
Thanks
Morgan

Inter business area transactions and trading partner business area

Hi Gurus,
We are on R3 4.7. *We have more than one business area but only one company code*.. We do pull financial statements by business area.
One of the business area A gets a service contract to do work. Some part of the work is outsourced from business area A to business Area B. Business Area A pays to business Area B for the services done by business area B.
While doing payment to the business area B, do we need to populate trading partner busiess area as business area A? Is this trading partner busiess area mandatory to be populated in this type of scenario.
Are there any things we need to be aware of when they are inter business area transactions as described in the above scenario.
We are not implementing EC-CS/any other consolidation solution.
Thanks,
Edited by: James09 on Jul 11, 2011 7:41 PM

If no consolidation system is implemeneted, then the partner business area is not mandatory. However it may be helpful for analysis as well as any future consolidations that may be necessary. Therefore it is suggested that this be captured, and in many cases will automatically be populated.

Can't delete Capability for a tradeing Partner

Hi All:
When I trying to delete a 4C1 (Inventory Information Provider) V99.01 capability from a trading partner, I received the following errors:
An error occurred when deleting the supported collaboration role.
java.lang.NullPointerException : null
I have make sure there is no activate configuration using any 4C1 capabilities (quiese, retire and purge has been done).
We do have multiple different version of 4C1 capabilities registered for this same trading partner. please do not ask why we need so many versions. In our system (development box), we are having the following operational capability:
Collaboration Collobroation Role Version
4C1 Inventory Information Provider V02.00
4C1 Inventory Information Provider V02.03
4C1 Inventory Information Provider V09.01
4C1 Inventory Information Provider V99.01
4C1 Inventory Information Provider V98.01
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
I hope you may have followed same steps but still I am listing down -
1. Make sure there is no configuration in quiesced or retired state which is using this business action. If it is, then purge that configuration first.
2. There is no agreement in valid state which is using this configuration. If it is then delete that agreement first.
3. Go to trading partner -->capabilities --> <select protocol>---> operational capability
delete this business action now.
If you are trying to delete from partners --> protocols --> <specific protocol> --> document protocol then first make sure that no TP is using this collaboration and then delete.
Follow below thread for order of deletion of business action (last post of this thread) -
Deleting the B2B configuration completely
Regards,
Anuj
Edited by: Anuj Dwivedi on May 15, 2009 9:47 AM

Use of trading partner

Hi,
Can trading partner be user for INTRA COMPANY posting ie stock transfer from on plant to another with same company code.
We are doing stock transfer, and we are getting error message --> Consolidated companies US20 and US30 are different.
Here, the sold to/ship to US2020u2019s trading partner is US20 and of the carrier, US3003 has trading partner US30. The utility of the trading partner to us for US3003 is not there as we are not doing nay inter company postings to US3003 (it has itu2019s invoicing party defined as US3002 to which we do all the invoicing and that has itu2019s trading partner US30 as it should be.
Please suggest
BR,
Zulfikar

The Trading partner field in customer and Vendor master is used to identify the affiliated companies involved in intercompany transactions.
The trading partner field is copied into the account receivable and payable transactions from the customer and vendor master. The Trading partner field also appears in the line items of the offsetting clearing accounts via substitutons.
The trading partner field subsequently can be used during consolidation to eliminate intercompany receivables and payables from the balance sheet and eliminate Intercompany sales and expense figures from the P&L statement.
Customer or vendor invoice: Trading partner information is captured from the customer and vendor master.
Invoice receipts against clearing account and transfers with clearing: While posting Invoice receipt during an Intercompany transaction, the invoice receipt can be posted to a clearing account instead of expense account. The selection of open items must be restricted to those with a certain trading partner when posting a transfer later on, as the trading partner is copied into the transfer line item.
Customer and Vendor Payments: If document types for payments are configured to allow for more than one trading partner in a payment document then the trading partner is copied only on the customer and vendor line item and not on the offsetting entry.
Assets transferred between company codes: If an asset is transferred between group company codes, two accounting documents are generated in each of the involved company codes. The trading partner of each document must be set to the company id of the other company code.
When goods are received from group company code the trading partner is picked for the inventory and GR/IR line items from the vendor mentioned on the order. If invoices are open as on the balance key date then group-internal provisions are created from the GR/IR accounts. These provisions can later be eliminated in Consolidation system.
Regards,
Gaurav

SRM contract in awaiting approval state

Hi Gurus,
We are facing an issue where srm contract is approved via a n step badi workflow. But even after completion of workflow the document remains in awaiting approval state.
The step which sets the document status to released status is called in background step in workflow.
If we examine the workflow logs they indicate the successful execution of this release step without any error.
However document is not released.
On further investigation we found that if the business partners who are present in active version and who have got expired at the time of creation of change version causes this to happnen.
Presently we have a workaround by which we replace the expired business partner with a new business partner in active version and then release the change version.
However to develop a permanent fix we are not able to replicate this scenario in our system.
Kindly provide your guidance on this issue.
Regards,
Rohit

Hi Rohit
you have a root cause of this problem
On further investigation we found that if the business partners who are present in active version and who have got expired at the time of creation of change version causes this to happnen.
for testing purpose you can delete this test user or ask basis person to inactivate this user .
1. create a GOA by test user19 buyer1)
2. Approve a GOA by test manager1
3. now delete user1 or inactivate the user1 id BY CHANGING THE VALIDIDTY DATE OF THE USER .
4. revise the GOA by user2 (buyer2) and approve it . will you recreate the same /
RELEASED AT TOP BUT CHANGE VERSION AWAITING FOR APPROVAL IN THE APPROVAL PREVIEW.
if your analysis is true. it is your wonderful investigation.
Muthu

Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
Michal

Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh

Go-live in EC-CS:update trading partner and transaction type on Balances

Hi collegues,
We are on a go-live this december for EC-CS (consolidation) but never have used trading partner nor consolidation transaction type so there are not GL account balances differenciated by these two items on our FMGLFLEXT database for the operative ledger.
Which is the best option for the data to be collected into our consolidation ledger in EC-CS (ECMCT database) when data transfer for all our consolidation units will be realtime update from FI?
I really don't know if I must correct the balance on FMGLFLEXT throught FI postings or if just adjustments on EC-CS it's the best option. I'm thinking on the posibility of extracting the Financial Statement at any time from F.01 tx...
Is there any transaction on FI to authomatically update at least the trading partner on GL accounts positions/balances?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Rushid

Hi David,
In fact there has never existed any entry for trading partners on GL, AR, AP master data. So consequenly, no balance in FAGLFLEXT/ nor documents on BSEG have ever had these fields populated.
My question is: which is the common option for a go live in such situation? Our users will distribute the current GL balances into "sub-balances" (GLAcctTxtypetradpartner) in an excell file but I do not really know what to do with this data:
- direct postings on BSEG cancelling the previous totals,
- rollup into a Special ledger of the new gl,
- rollup into the Preparations for Consolidation Ledger,
- corrections on ECMCT after the periodic extract...
What would choose?
Thanks!

FAGL_FC_TRANS - Incorrect Trading Partner & Partner Profit Center

I am using transaction FAGL_FC_TRANS at month-end to re-translate the income statement of our foreign operations from the daily rate to the avg monthly rate to satisfy a financial reporting requirement. The transaction produces the correct FX adjustment by GL account. My issue arises when the original posting being revalued or translated has a trading partner and partner profit center. The FAGL_FC_TRANS does not provide the correct trading partner and partner profit center on the fx adjustments. Also, SAP is populating a trading partner and partner profit center on my FX gain/loss accounts which is incorrect. SAP advised me to populate fields to be validate on table V_FAGL_FCBAL. I inserted trading partner and partner profit center on this table but this does not seem to correct the issue. We are on 6.0 and use document splitting. I am thinking this may be the cause but not sure how to correct. Has anyone experienced this?
Thank you,
Joe

Implement the following SAP note.
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1087737

Trading partner is in Approved state.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for